PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN …€¦ · The private sector will have to...
Transcript of PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN …€¦ · The private sector will have to...
PERSPECTIVE SERIES:
HONG KONG AND SINGAPORE
JUNE 2020
GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 2PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
OVERVIEW
ESG: the Asia Pacific perspective
Climate change and ESG
Product review: Bonds
Product review: Loans
Regulatory and policy developments
1
2
34
5
6
Opportunities and risks for
financial institutions
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 3PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
2100 WARMING
PROJECTIONS
Emissions and expected
warming based on pledges
and current policies
Projections for the rise in average global temperature paint a bleak picture –
current policies (even if fully implemented) predict 3.2°C rise by 2100
THE BLEAK PICTURE
CLIMATE CHANGE AND ESG
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 4PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
Climate impacts 'to cost world $7.9 trillion' by 2050
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT
CLIMATE CHANGE AND ESG
ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF
CLIMATE CHANGE
Average real GDP loss by 2050
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 5PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• EU Sustainable Finance Action Plan
• FSB Task Force on Climate Related Disclosure (TCFD)
• ICMA Green Bond Principles
• LMA Green Loan Principles
• FCA Climate Change Feedback Statement
(October 2019)
• PRA Policy and Supervisory Statements
• Climate Financial Risk Forum
• G20 Green Finance Study Group
• Network for Greening the Financial System
• UK Green Finance Task Force & UK Green Finance
Institute
• EU Green Deal
• EU Climate Law
• EU Sustainable Disclosure Regulation
• EU Low Carbon Benchmark Regulation
• EBA Action Plan on Sustainable Finance
There are huge number of regulatory and policy initiatives in the area, many of which
will impact banks and their clients.
OVERVIEW
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 6PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
The EU Sustainable Finance Action Plan is part of a
wider drive to meet EU climate and energy targets.
EU SUSTAINABLE FINANCE ACTION PLAN
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
Source: European Commission
The EU committed to three ambitious climate and energy targets for 2030
in line with the UN 2030 Agenda, the SDGs and the Paris Agreement.
In its long-term strategy, the EU strives for net-zero GHG emissions by 2050.
Public supporting schemes alone will not be sufficient to meet those investment needs.
The private sector will have to play a huge role and a smart policy framework is needed to incentivise private investment.
Public money Private money
The yearly investment gap to meet these targets
is estimated to be
around €180 billion.
Minimum 40% cut in
greenhouse gas emissions
compared to 1990 levels
At least a 32.5% energy
saving compared with the
business-as-usual scenario
At least a 32% share of
renewables in final energy
consumption
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 7PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
In January 2018, the EU High Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance produced its
final report. In March 2018, the Commission published the Sustainable Finance Action
Plan, its "roadmap" for implementing sustainability into the EU financial system.
EU SUSTAINABLE FINANCE ACTION PLAN (CONT.)
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
1. Establishing an EU classification system for
sustainable activities (“The Taxonomy”)
6. Better integrating sustainability in ratings and market
research
2. Creating Standards and labels for green financial
products
7. Clarifying Institutional Investors’ and asset managers’
duties (“The Disclosure Regulation”)
3. Fostering investments in sustainable projects 8. Incorporating sustainability in prudential requirements
4. Incorporating sustainability when providing financial
advice
9. Strengthening sustainability disclosures and account
rule making
5. Developing sustainability benchmarks10. Fostering sustainable corporate governance and
attenuating short-termism in the capital markets
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 8PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
EU SUSTAINABLE FINANCE ACTION PLAN (CONT.)
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
PROGRESS ON KEY ACTIONS OF THE ACTION PLAN
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 9PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
EU SUSTAINABLE FINANCE ACTION PLAN (CONT.)
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
TIMELINE OF KEY ACTIONS OF THE ACTION PLAN
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 10PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• On 15 April 2020, the European Council adopted the “EU Taxonomy”
regulation. The regulation now needs to be adopted by the European
Parliament at second reading before it can be published in the Official Journal
and enter into force.
• The Taxonomy will embed a taxonomy for environmentally sustainable
activities into EU law so that the classification system can be used in different
areas, for example labels, standards and benchmarks.
• The Taxonomy sets out the criteria for determining if an activity (not a
company or asset) is environmentally sustainable, but leaves future
delegated regulations to detail the Technical Screening Criteria.
• Will apply to any EU or national regulator that sets out requirements relating
to financial products or corporate bonds that are marketed as environmentally
sustainable, to financial market participants in relation to offering financial
products, and to non-financial statements prepared by large public-interest
entities.
• Any company which intends to issue green bonds in accordance with the
proposed EU Green Bond Standard will be required to demonstrate that
proceeds are used only for Taxonomy-aligned activities.
The Taxonomy is the EU’s attempt to develop a classification system for determining if
an economic activity is environmentally sustainable
EU SUSTAINABLE FINANCE ACTION PLAN – THE TAXONOMY
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 11PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
When is an activity environmentally sustainable?
EU SUSTAINABLE FINANCE ACTION PLAN – THE TAXONOMY (CONT.)
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
Must comply with additional specific technical screening criteria
Must comply with OECD guidelines, UN guiding principles on business and human rights, ILO declaration on fundamental rights and principles at
work and International Bill of Human Rights
Must not “significantly harm” any of the environmental objectives
Must “contribute substantially” to one or more of the environmental objectives or be a transitional or enabling activity
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 12PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
Timeline
EU SUSTAINABLE FINANCE ACTION PLAN – THE TAXONOMY (CONT.)
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
December
2020
December
2021
December
2022
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 13PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
Technical screening criteria
Taxonomy Technical Report: coverage examples
EU SUSTAINABLE FINANCE ACTION PLAN – THE TAXONOMY (CONT.)
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
Coal
No
Gas
Potentially
Construction,
real estate
Potentially
Nuclear
Not currently
Maritime transport
and aviation
Not currently
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 14PERSPECTIVES SERIES
March 2020: Proposed EU target of net zero greenhouse
emissions by 2050
• By 2050, any future GHG emissions in the EU must be matched by removals
of GHGs
• Impact on existing 2030 targets:
– Will require EC to review its current target to reduce GHG emissions by 40%
by 2030 – up to a 50/ 55% reduction may need to be targeted
• Post-2030 trajectory:
– Climate Law will empower the EC to set an EU-level trajectory to meet the
2050 target without Member State/ EU Parliament approval
• Achieving the 2050 target will require implementation of the full range of policy
measures set out in the EC’s 2019 Green Deal
EU CLIMATE LAW
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 15PERSPECTIVES SERIES
Clarifying institutional investors’ and
asset managers’ duties
• Harmonisation of disclosure requirements for financial
market participants and financial advisers
• Sustainability risks should be integrated into financial
market participants’ investment decision-making/
advisory processes
– Integration remains a key concern: NGFS Status
Report in May 2020 noted that there was still
insufficient integration of ESG analysis into risk
management frameworks
– Financial institutions instead tend to classify ESG risk
management measures separately, as part of CSR
measures or mitigation measures for reputational
risks
EU SUSTAINABLE DISCLOSURE REGULATION
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
Key specific disclosure requirements include:
“Principal adverse impact of investment decisions
on sustainability factors”
Policies on integration of sustainability risks into
the investment decision-making/ advisory process
Additional information on products promoting
social or environmental characteristics/ with the
objective of sustainable investment
Specified platforms for disclosure: website, pre-
contractual documents, remuneration policies etc.
1
2
3
4
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 16PERSPECTIVES SERIES
EU Low Carbon Benchmarks Regulation
• Two categories of financial benchmarks created to help
investors measure the carbon footprint of their investments
– EU Climate Transition Benchmarks
– EU Paris-Aligned Benchmarks
• April 2020: EC publishes sets of draft Commission
Delegated Regulations
EU LOW CARBON BENCHMARKS REGULATION AND EBA
ACTION PLAN FOR SUSTAINABLE FINANCE
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
EBA Action Plan on Sustainable Finance
• EBA work aimed at (1) improving the regulatory framework for
institutions to foster their operations in sustainable manner and (2)
providing supervisors with tools to monitor and assess ESG risks
• Between 2019 – 2025, the EBA will, in relation to:
– Strategy and risk management: assess the development of a
uniform definition of ESG risks, methods for understanding the
impact of ESG risks on institutions etc.
– Key metrics and disclosure: develop technical standards to
implement disclosure requirements in the CRR.
– Stress testing: develop climate change stress test to identify banks’
vulnerabilities to climate-related risk
– Prudential treatment: assess if dedicated prudential treatment of
exposures related to activities associated substantially with ESG
objectives would be justified
• Institutions encouraged to take steps in the first three areas above.
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 17PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
SINGAPORE
ESG: THE ASIA PACIFIC PERSPECTIVE
Sustainable Finance Initiatives
• Sustainable Bond Grant Scheme
• IFC-MAS Partnership
• ABS Guidelines on Responsible
Financing
• Sustainable Insurance Forum
• Asia Sustainable Finance Initiative
• Singapore Stewardship Principles
• Network of Central Banks and
Supervisors for Greening the Financial
System
• Jobs and training
US$200b per year estimated
green investment needed in
ASEAN till 2030
>80% of top asset managers in
Singapore are already UN PRI
signatories
57 investment organisations
expressing support for the
Singapore Stewardship
Principles
MAS working on a
comprehensive, long-term
strategy to make sustainable
finance a defining feature of
Singapore’s role as an
international financial centre
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 18PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• Hang Seng Indexes launches two new ESG benchmarks (14 May 2020)
• HKMA Circular on Common Assessment Framework on Green and
Sustainable Banking (13 May 2020)
• Joint statement on the establishment of the Green and Sustainable Finance
Cross-Agency Steering Group (5 May 2020)
• Launch of Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency Sustainability Linked Loan
Assessment Service (2 January 2020)
• HKEx publishes ESG Guide consultation conclusions and ESG disclosure
review findings (18 December 2019)
• Report on the results of SFC survey on ESG, climate change and asset
management (December 2019)
An acceleration in momentum for initiatives to integrate ESG considerations and
factors into the financial services industry and business environment in Hong Kong
HONG KONG
ESG: THE ASIA PACIFIC PERSPECTIVE
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 19PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• Key part of Phase I measures to promote green and sustainable banking
(announced on 7 May 2019) was to develop a common framework to assess
the “greenness baseline” of Ais
• HKMA has now developed a self-assessment framework
• Key aspects of the assessment framework:
– Objective: Intention is to facilitate AIs in reviewing readiness and
preparedness for climate and environmental risks, help formulate
strategies and approaches, and inform the design of supervisory
expectation and requirements under Phase II.
– Design: Collect information about climate and environmental risks under
six key elements, including (i) governance, (ii) corporate planning and
tools, (iii) risk management process, (iv) business policies, products and
services, (v) performance and resources, and (vi) disclosure and
communication.
– Scope of AIs and timeline: implement the assessment on around 50 AIs
based predominantly on their asset sizes and business activities; 12
weeks to complete assessment
HKMA Circular on Common Assessment Framework on Green and
Sustainable Banking
HONG KONG (CONT.)
ESG: THE ASIA PACIFIC PERSPECTIVE
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 20PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• The Steering Group aims to:
– coordinate the management of climate and environmental risks to the
financial sector
– accelerate the growth of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong
– support the Government’s climate strategies
• Through:
– examining policy and regulatory issues;
– facilitating policy direction and coordination to ensure Hong Kong has a
cohesive and comprehensive green and sustainable finance strategy;
– addressing technical cross-sectoral issues;
– tracking international and regional trends, issues and developments in
green and sustainable finance, and considering how Hong Kong should
better position itself and provide leadership in the region and globally; and
– identifying areas where Hong Kong can promote its strengths and thought
leadership
Joint statement on the establishment of the Green and Sustainable Finance Cross-
Agency Steering Group
HONG KONG (CONT.)
ESG: THE ASIA PACIFIC PERSPECTIVE
Initiators:
• Hong Kong Monetary Authority
• Securities and Futures Commission
Members:
• Environment Bureau
• Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau
• Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
• Insurance Authority
• Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 21PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• HKEx will implement the consultation proposals, with modifications, which will
be effective for financial years commencing on or after 1 July 2020.
• Key changes to the ESG Guide and related Listing Rules include:
1. Introducing mandatory disclosure requirements to include:
- a statement setting out the board’s consideration of ESG matters;
- application of Reporting Principles “materiality”, “quantitative” and
“consistency”; and
- explanation of reporting boundaries of ESG reports.
2. Requiring disclosure of significant climate-related issues which have
impacted and may impact the issuer;
3. Amending the “Environmental” key performance indicators (KPIs) to
require disclosure of relevant targets;
4. Upgrading the disclosure obligation of all “Social” KPIs to “comply or
explain”; and
5. Shortening the deadline for publication of ESG reports to within five
months after the financial year-end.
HKEx publishes ESG Guide consultation conclusions
and ESG disclosure review findings
HONG KONG (CONT.)
ESG: THE ASIA PACIFIC PERSPECTIVE
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 22PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• On 9 June 2020:
- ICMA updates Social Bond Principles
- ICMA publishes Social Bond Impact Reporting: Working Towards a
Harmonized Framework for Impact Reporting for Social Bonds
- ICMA publishes the sustainability-linked bond principles (SLBP)
voluntary guidelines
- ICMA publishes: Social and Sustainability Bond Case Studies:
Examples from Frameworks applied in Capital markets
• EU Green Bond Standard
A wave of new principles, guidelines and standards
BONDS
PRODUCT REVIEW
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 23PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• This edition provides a definition of a social issue which may benefit from a
social project:
“A social issue threatens, hinders, or damages the well-being of
society or a specific target population”.
• It also includes an expansion of examples of project categories and target
populations
• Target populations - those that are: (1) Living below the poverty line, (2)
Excluded and/or marginalised populations and /or communities, (3) People
with disabilities, (4) Migrants and /or displaced persons, (5) Undereducated,
(6) Underserved, owing to a lack of quality access to essential goods and
services, (7) Unemployed, (8) Women and/or sexual and gender minorities,
(9) Aging populations and vulnerable youth, and (10) Other vulnerable
groups, including as a result of natural disasters
• Social Bond Impact Reporting: Working Towards a Harmonized Framework
for Impact Reporting for Social Bonds (June 2020).
Social Bond Principles (June 2020)
BONDS
PRODUCT REVIEW
Project Categories:
• Affordable basic infrastructure
• Access to essential services
• Affordable housing
• Employment generation
• Food security and sustainable food systems
• Socioeconomic advancement and empowerment
Especially but not exclusively for “Target Populations”
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 24PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles (June 2020)
BONDS
PRODUCT REVIEW
• These relate to bonds where certain terms (usually the interest rate) vary
depending on meeting (or not) sustainability targets/KPIs, rather than being
the traditional "use of proceeds" green bonds, where proceeds have to be
applied to sustainable investments (for sustainability-linked bonds you can
use the money for whatever you like – although if you start investing in coal
plants you are likely to get some investor complaints).
• They build on the work of the LMA sustainability-linked loan principles.
Five core components:
• Selection of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
• Calibration of Sustainability Performance Targets (SPTs)
• Bond characteristics
• Reporting
• Verification
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 25PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
As part of the Sustainable Finance Action Plan, the EU Technical
Expert Group has developed new voluntary EU Green Bond
Standard harmonised with its work on the EU taxonomy.
Similar to existing standards
• Remains a “use of proceeds” standard with similar characteristics to the
ICMA GBP
• Green bond framework
• Reporting at least annually
A few key differences
• Use of proceeds aligned with the EU taxonomy (or its principles until fully
developed)
• Third party verification will be mandatory
• Verifiers will need to have external accreditation (ultimately by ESMA)
Recommendations to encourage growth
The New EU Green bond standard
BONDS
PRODUCT REVIEW
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 26PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
• On 12 June 2020, the European Commission launched an Consultation:
Targeted consultation on the establishment of an EU Green Bond Standard.
• The Consultation is open until 2 October.
• The Commission is considering how to take the recommendations of the
TEG forward. The consultation is designed to gather further input of a
technical nature from relevant stakeholders in the green bond market, in
particular issuers, investors and related service providers.
The New EU Green bond standard (Cont.)
BONDS
PRODUCT REVIEW
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 27PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
Recent Developments
BONDS
PRODUCT REVIEW
Asia Pacific:
• Agricultural Development Bank of China’ s “COVID-19” Bonds
• Republic of Indonesia’s “COVID-19” Bonds
Transition bonds
• Castle Peak Power Co’s energy transition bond (June 2020).
Transactions aligned with EU Taxonomy
• In Europe, issuers such as Rabobank are beginning to align their Green
Bond Framework with the current draft of the EU-Green Bond Standard on
a best-efforts basis
Sustainability Step-ups/Step-downs
• Margin varies depending on how borrower performs against certain
sustainability criteria - CO2/greenhouse gas emissions, ESG score etc.
• ENEL recently issued USD and EUR sustainability linked bonds with step-
ups linked to 1) renewable energy; and 2) GHG emission targets
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 28PERSPECTIVES SERIES
LOANS
PRODUCT REVIEW
Green Loans SLLs
Core
component
Use of proceeds. Performance against SPTs.
Incorporation
of ESG
considerations
GLP include a non-exhaustive list of categories of
eligibility for green loans (e.g. renewable energy,
climate change adaptation, green buildings)
SPTs tied to ESG considerations. SPTs can be (i) internal
(bespoke to the borrower’s business) and/or (ii) external (set
against a borrower’s ESG performance in relation to its peers).
Materiality assessments should be undertaken to identify the most
important ESG considerations to the borrower’s business.
Reporting
requirements
Borrowers should maintain information on the use of
proceeds, which should be updated annually.
Methodologies used to calculate performance
indicators should be disclosed.
Borrowers should report on SPTs at least annually, and confirm
any change in the calculation methodology used.
Documentation No template wording available. However,
documentation should clearly set out:
• Use of proceeds provisions – eligible green
project categories
• Information covenants – covenants relating to
the green projects
• Representations – a representation as to the
accuracy of reporting
• Any “green” breaches and their consequences
No template wording available. However, documentation should
clearly set out:
• SPTs – source and level of each SPT, and how it has been
established
• SPT measurement – mechanism for measurement of
improvement (e.g. absolute value or percentage change in a
metric)
• Sources of information – what information is being relied on
for measuring SPTs and any independent verification
requirements
• Any “sustainability” breaches and their consequences
APLMA/ LMA/ LSTA Guidance on Green Loan Principles and
Sustainability Linked Loan Principles
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 29PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
Changes in ESG rating
methodologies
• History of frequent changes: e.g.
Sustainalytics running (1) legacy
system with higher scores for
better ESG performance and (2)
new system with lower scores
for low ESG risk
• Ensures reporting standards
remain relevant, as changing
methodologies reflect changing
perceptions of risk
Market precedents – Green and
sustainability-linked loans
• US$65m revolving capital call
facility for Quadria Capital, the first
capital call facility in the world to link
the interest rate of a private equity
fund to the sustainability
performance of its portfolios.
• €1.5b revolving facility for Nokia
Corporation where the pricing was
linked to Nokia’s reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions, both
from its own operations and those
attributable to customers’ use of its
products.
• US$400m GLP-compliant facility
for ICBC to be used for green
projects in line with ICBC’s newly
established Green Finance
Framework.
PRODUCT REVIEW
Evolving ESG due diligence
standards
• January 2020: LSTA publishes
inaugural ESG Diligence
Questionnaire, focusing on a
company’s:
1. ESG governance
2. Relevant ESG frameworks
3. Relevant ESG factors
4. Breakdown of revenue.
• February 2020: ELFA publishes
ESG Investor Survey and forms a
working group to promote ESG
investing across European loan and
bond markets.
LOANS
|CLIFFORD CHANCE
Risk management.
Establish processes for monitoring and managing own exposures
to climate change including physical, transition and liability risks.
Monitoring sustainable finance
regulatory developments and
advocacy.
Firms will need to have processes in place
for monitoring regulatory developments
and to allocate responsibility for
responding to consultations, engaging with
trade associations etc.
Internal monitoring and record keeping.
Establish policies and procedures to track green
products produced by the firm to monitor compliance
with new legislation and guidelines, as well as any
use of proceeds or sustainability requirements under
green or sustainability-linked loans
Adaptation to incoming legislation.
Firms will need to have projects and expertise in place to adapt
to the systematic inclusion of ESG and sustainability
considerations into incoming legislation including the EU
Disclosure Regulation, MiFID II, the Taxonomy Regulation, SRD
II and the Benchmarks Regulation.
Sustainable finance requirements
will have firm-wide impact –
ensure that there is appropriate
input to other projects.
Firms should make sure that their team(s)
focussed on ESG issues also have input
into other projects which may have an ESG
element but which are led by other teams.
PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
ACTIONS POINTS FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
REGULATORY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS
REGULATORY
AND POLICY
DEVELOPMENTS
30
|CLIFFORD CHANCE 31PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
A RANGE OF RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.
WHAT ARE THE OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS FOR
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS?
• Development of new products and new
business lines
• Expertise in the sector is increasingly a
differentiating factor
• CSR - Making a positive impact on ESG
matters
• Green growth as growth story of 21st
century?
• Clients and investors increasingly
focused on ESG
• Brand perception – opportunity to be and
be seen as a market leader
• Regulatory change will require
engagement, amendments to policies
and processes (particularly in relation to
disclosure), audit and compliance
oversight etc.
• What risks arise from marketing products
like green bonds?
• Additional human and technical
resources needed to adapt to new rules
– for example, new rules require
disclosure on environmental, not just
financial, risks
• Litigation/shareholder activism risks –
how are they assessed and monitored?
• Physical risks to assets from climate
change – how are they assessed and
monitored?
Oppo
rtunitie
sR
isks
|CLIFFORD CHANCEPERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
KEY CONTACTS
Matthew Fairclough
Partner
T: +852 2825 8927
32
Mark Chan
Partner
T: +852 2826 3424
Joanne Chan
Senior Associate
T: +65 6506 1966
Andrew Hutchins
Partner
T: +65 6661 2060
|CLIFFORD CHANCE
ABU DHABI CASABLANCA LONDON NEWCASTLE SÃO PAULO WARSAW
AMSTERDAM DUBAI LUXEMBOURG NEW YORK SEOUL WASHINGTON, D.C.
BARCELONA DÜSSELDORF MADRID PARIS SHANGHAI
BEIJING FRANKFURT MILAN PERTH SINGAPORE
BRUSSELS HONG KONG MOSCOW PRAGUE SYDNEY KYIV1
BUCHAREST ISTANBUL MUNICH ROME TOKYO RIYADH2
WHY CLIFFORD CHANCE
PERSPECTIVE SERIES: GLOBAL AND ASIA PACIFIC THEMES IN ESG FINANCING
OUR INTERNATIONAL NETWORK
32 OFFICES
22 COUNTRIES
1. Clifford Chance has a best friends relationship with Redcliffe Partners in Ukraine.
2. Clifford Chance has a co-operation agreement with Abuhimed Alsheikh Alhagbani Law Firm in Riyadh.
33
Clifford Chance, 27th Floor, Jardine House, One Connaught Place, Hong Kong
© Clifford Chance 2020
Clifford Chance
WWW.CLIFFORDCHANCE.COM