PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon...

6
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis of C I Line Profiles Presented by Phil West a for Ralph Isler b and Neil Brooks a a General Atomics b ORNL DSOL ITPA Toronto November, 2006

Transcript of PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon...

Page 1: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis.

PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FORPIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION

Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis of C I Line Profiles

Presented by Phil Westa

for Ralph Islerb and Neil Brooksa

aGeneral AtomicsbORNL

DSOL ITPAToronto

November, 2006

Page 2: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis.

components of the 3P- 3Po Zeeman triplet of C I are used to determine the carbon production mechanism

• Physical sputtering:

o Asymmetric line shape

o Only a small red wing with respect to the rest frame wavelength because most atoms move toward the collection optics.

o Peak is shifted by -0.1 to -0.2 Å from the rest frame wavelength

• Chemical sputtering:

o Nearly symmetric line shape

o Peak shifted by only -0.03 to -0.04 Å owing to the near thermal release of parent hydrocarbon.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Triplet sourceReconvolutionMeasured points

Relative Amplitude

Δλ ( )Å

Page 3: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis.

Helium plasmas provide a good test for modeling profiles when physical sputtering is dominant.

• The red wing (Δλ is the result of reflections from the divertor tiles

• The Thompson formula, with Eimpact= 400 eV, is a good fit except near Δλ .

• An additional 9%

contribution from chemical sputtering gives the best fit to the source profile.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6

SymmetricThompsonTotal modeledSource profile

Relative Amplitude

Δλ ( )Å

= Thompson91% of total

.172 Å

Page 4: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis.

C I from the porous plug ( during methane injection) comes mainly from molecular dissociation.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4

SymmetricSource profile

Relative Amplitude

Δλ (Α)

-.32 Å

Porous plug - methane breakup

Two Gaussian Representation of Symmetric Component

97% - 0.35 eV 3% - 5.0 eV

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4

SymmetricThompsonTotal modeledSource profile

Amplitude (a.u.)

Δλ ( )Å

2.56 s

= Thompson1% of total

.3 Å

T1S = .75 eV

Outer strike point: Attached L-mode

Thompson =10% TotalCold symmetric peak (aka chemical sputtering)dominates

TS1 = 0.35 eV

Page 5: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis.

When divertor detachesC I Doppler shift drops to near zero

• Detached Case (solid): ne/nGW ~ 0.7 Div Thomson near OSP: ne

DIV ~2 x 1020 m-3 Te

DIV ~ 1.3 eV after t=3.0 s

• Attached Case (dashed): ne/nGW ~ 0.2 Div Thomson near OSP: ne

DIV ~2 x 1019 m-3 Te

DIV ~ 15. eV after t=3.0 s

• Suggests that C I emission in detached case is recombination dominated

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

0.01(a)

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

0.01

1 2 3 4 5Time (s)

(b)

Inner Strike Zone

Outer Strike Zone

Page 6: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Determination of Carbon Release Mechanisms in the DIII-D Divertor from Analysis.

Summary

• Cold, symmetric peak present in all cases studied ( detached, attached, high and low NBI power)

• Thompson peak prominent only in high power NBI, attached cases

• In detached, high density, cold divertor cases, Doppler shift of cold symmetric peak drops to values much lower than expected for chemical sputtering, probably a sign that recombination dominates the C I emission.