Permit Processing Goals for 2011
description
Transcript of Permit Processing Goals for 2011
Permit Processing Goals for 2011
Michael Hopkins, P.E. , Assistant Chief, DAPCAndrew Hall, Permit Manager, DAPC
Newburgh Steel Works Photo
Newburgh Steel Works, Cleveland circa 1893Case Western Reserve Historical Society
Topics
Statistics on current installation permit status
Installation Goals for 2011 Statistics on current operating permit
status Operating Permit Goals for 2011
Installation Permit Status
Installation Permit Program Data
Reviewed data from Stars2 from November 2009 through October 2010
Looked at issuance of installation permits including GPs, PBRs, PTIs, PTIOs
Looked at the current workload of installation permits
PBRs Processed
690 PBR accepted
13.5 days average processing Soil-vapor
0%Nonmetal-
lic3%Mid Print-
ing1%
Molding0%
Emer Gen51%
GDF Stage I/II26%
GDF Stage I
10%
Auto body5%
Soil-liquid0%
Small print-ing1%
Boiler and heater
2%
PBR Issuance Percentages
General Permits Processed
8 % install permits issued were GPs
Issued 42 GP 29.7 days average
processing
GP8%
Non GP92%
GP Type Issued
Installation Permits Processed
506 Installation permits (GP & Non) Included 1152 EUs ~2 EU per Installation Permit 117.5 avg OEPA days 140.5 avg Total days
Installation Permits Processed
30 60 90 120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360Mor
e0
20406080
100120140160
0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%
Issued Permits vs. Ohio EPA Processsing TimeNovember 2009 through October 2010 Data - 506
Permits*
FrequencyCumulative %
Ohio EPA Permit Processing Time (bins)
Num
ber
of In
stal
lati
on/C
hapt
er 3
1 Pe
rmit
s Is
sued
*Includes General Permits (41) but not Permit by Rules
PTI vs. PTIO
PTIO77%
PTI23%
Permit Type Issued
Initial vs. Chapter 31
Initial75%
Chap3125%
Initial or Chap 31 Permit Type Issued
Install Permit Workload (DO/Laa/CO Workflow)
30 60 90 120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360More
010203040506070
0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%
Installation Permit Workflow Time vs. Number of Permits
November 24, 2010 Data
FrequencyCumulative %
DO/LAA/CO Installation Permit Task Days (Bins)Init
ial a
nd C
hapt
er 3
1 In
stal
ltio
n Pe
rmit
s
2011 Installation Permit Goals
Installation Permit Goal Basis
Reduce workload to “no backlog” level Reduce number of “old” permits Meet 14-day Completeness review goal Continue timely processing of CO reviews Further develop high priority “high
communication” process Process Section Manager identified high
priority permits using “high communication” process
Tracking of DO/Laa 2011 Install Goals
Tracked through Stars2 Report Mgmt Reports… Permits Status…
DO/Laa: select one Types: PTI & PTIO Reasons: Initial Installation & Chapter 31 Mod
& Not Yet Assigned
DO/Laa 2011 Install GoalsDO/Laa Current Installation Workload* and
2011 GoalsDO/Laa Current
Workload“Old” Permits* 2011 Goal
01 – CDO 19 2 3002 - NEDO 28 4 3003 - NWDO 62 22 3004 - Toledo 3 0 505 - SWDO 3 0 506 - SEDO 39 20 3007 - Portsmouth
11 6 10
08 - RAPCA 7 0 1013 - Cleveland 15 1 1514 - HAMCO 12 0 1515 - Canton 9 3 1016 - Akron 9 1 10Total 217 59 200*As of November 26, 2010, Old = DO/Laa/CO workflow >180
Central Office Goals
Continue current practice of limited review and rapid turn-around (CO goal)
Develop guidance concerning when the “high communication” process is to be used, the processed used and a revised fee procedure (CO goal)
Develop guidance concerning processing of “old” permits
Operating Permit Workload and Goals
Permit Workload
NSR Permits: Number of applications rec’d for Initial Installation/CH31Mods are variable but follow historic trends
Title V Permits: fixed number FEPTIO: fixed number PTIO: fixed number or decrease
Permit Balance 101
Input + Generation – Output – Consumption = Accumulation
Input: applications received Generation: splitting of applications Output: permits issued Consumption: facility shutdowns Accumulation: permit buildup within the system
DO/Laa 2011 Title V GoalsDO/Laa Title V Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and
2011 GoalsDO/Laa Title V
Facilities2010 Finals Issued
2011 Goal
01 – CDO 55 1 1102 - NEDO 105 12 2103 - NWDO 127 20 2504 - Toledo 26 6 505 - SWDO 15 1 306 - SEDO 81 0 1607 - Portsmouth
14 2 3
08 - RAPCA 32 6 613 - Cleveland 48 0 1014 - HAMCO 60 8 1215 - Canton 21 0 416 - Akron 24 3 5Total 619 59 121
*Final Title V permits issued as of November 26, 2010
Title V Types Processing Goals
Initial Title V Renewal Title V (Expired or Extended) Sig Mod (9 month goal) MPM (90 day goal) APA Off Permit Change See TOPs Report, STARS2 Management
Reports
DO/Laa 2011 FEPTIO GoalsDO/Laa FEPTIO Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and
2011 GoalsDO/Laa FEPTIO
Facilities2010 FinalFEPTIO
2011 Goal
01 – CDO 117 5 2302 - NEDO 116 2 2303 - NWDO 143 1 2904 - Toledo 23 0 505 - SWDO 24 0 506 - SEDO 123 0 2507 - Portsmouth
6 0 1
08 - RAPCA 76 2 1513 - Cleveland 56 1 1114 - HAMCO 126 6 2515 - Canton 26 1 516 - Akron 69 7 14Total 905 25 181
*PTIO Renewal with “Draft/Final Issuance” as of Nov. 26, 2010
DO/Laa 2011 Renewal PTIO Goals
DO/Laa PTIO Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and 2011 Goals**
DO/Laa PTIO Facilities 2010 PTIOs 2011 Goal01 – CDO 920 30 9202 - NEDO 920 29 9203 - NWDO 769 168 7704 - Toledo 238 4 2405 - SWDO 135 10 1406 - SEDO 518 9 5207 - Portsmouth
66 1 7
08 - RAPCA 448 47 4513 - Cleveland 669 37 6714 - HAMCO 791 69 7915 - Canton 271 2 2716 - Akron 446 33 45Total 6191 439 619*As of Nov. 26, 2010 ** Based on 10-yr Renewal Cycle
Useful STARS2 Management Reports
Report Tree (Permit Classification): to identify facility classifications
Expiration Report: identify expired permits within selected time frames
Workload Trend Report: shows month-by-month permit applications rec’d/permits issued
Wrap-up
Questions?