Performance of the Recovery System of an Oil Refinery

14
Performance of the Recovery System of an Oil Refinery Prepared by Ibrahim Kahraman

description

Performance of the Recovery System of an Oil Refinery. Prepared by Ibrahim Kahraman. Foreknowledge. Objective: Analyze the existing performance of recovery system in an oil refinery Groundwater Recovery Oil Recovery Site: Corpus Christi, Nueces County - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Performance of the Recovery System of an Oil Refinery

Page 1: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Performance of the Recovery System of an Oil Refinery

Prepared byIbrahim Kahraman

Page 2: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Foreknowledge

• Objective: Analyze the existing performance of recovery system in an oil refinery– Groundwater Recovery– Oil Recovery

• Site: Corpus Christi, Nueces County• Projected coordinate system:

NAD_1927_StatePlane_Texas_South_FIPS_4205• Geographic Coordinate System:

GCS_North_American_1927

Page 3: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Geology of the Area

Source: Texas Water Development Board – Geologic Database of Texas

Wa

Qal

Qb

Qb

Qal

Qd

F S

Qal

F S

F S

Wa

Qal SanPatricioSan

Patricio

SanPatricio

Nueces

·

0 1 20.5 Miles

Page 4: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

All Petroleum Facilities’ Well in the Area

Page 5: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Onsite Wells

Page 6: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Why are those wells for?

• CPT (Cone Penetrating Testing) – method used to provide soil properties and delineating soil stratigraphy(6 wells)

• Recovery Wells – Used for Extraction LNAPL (Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid) and Groudwater (88 wells)

• Observation Wells – Used for gauging only (85 wells• Monitoring Wells – Used for Gauging and Sampling

(24 wells)

Page 7: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Groundwater Quality Parameters Well ID:

Parameters Critical PCLs

Metals (SW846 6010 & 6020A) Arsenic 1Barium 200Chromium (Total) 10Lead 1.5Nickel 150Volatile Organics (SW846 8260B)

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.51,4-Dioxane 192-Butanone (MEK) 4400Benzene 0.5Carbon disulfide 730Chloroform 4.3Ethylbenzene 70Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 73Toluene 100m & p-Xylenes 1000o-Xylene 1000Semivolatile Organics (SW846 8270C)

1-Methylnaphthalene 5102,4-Dimethylphenol 1502-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) 3704-Methylphenol/3-Methylphenol 37Benzenethiol (Thiophenol) 0.073Bis(2-ethylhexy)phthalate 0.6Diethylphthalate 5800Naphthalene 57Phenol 2190

Page 8: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

ANT Effect on Confined/Unconfined LNAPL

Figures were provided from H2A Environmental Ltd.

Page 9: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Source: H2A Environmental Ltd.

Page 10: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

LNAPL Isolepth Map

Page 11: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Groundwater Surface Contour

Page 12: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Total Recovery Rates of Wellsin first half of 2011

Total Groundwater Recovery Total Hydrocarbon Recovery

Page 13: Performance of the Recovery  System of an Oil Refinery

Recovery Rates of Wells – 1998 thru 2011