Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance...

28
Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 1 Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Quiesup Kim, Shri G. Agarwal, and Tetsuo F. Miyahira Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109-8099

Transcript of Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance...

Page 1: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 1

Performance of Rad-Hard QuadReceivers at Extreme Temperatures

Quiesup Kim, Shri G. Agarwal, and Tetsuo F. Miyahira

Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of Technology

4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109-8099

Page 2: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 2

Purpose

• Characterize the electrical performance andreliabilities as potential space electronic parts underextreme low and high temperature (-125 ~ +150oC)environments extending nominal device specifications(-55 ~ +125oC).

• Identify needed enabling technologies to improveoperation, reliability, and lifetime of future spacemissions such as Mars.

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Page 3: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 3

Presentation outline

• Purpose• Rad-Hard Quad Receivers• Test Method• Results• Conclusions• Recommendations

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Page 4: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 4

Rad-Hard Quad Receiver

• A quad differential line receiver designed for digital data transmission (logicinput buffer) over balanced lines and meets the requirements of RS-422

• Radiation Hardened CMOS processing for low power consumption, highspeed, and reliable operation in the most severe radiation environments.

• Total Dose:100KRAD (Si)• Single Event Upset (SEU)• Single Event Latch-up (SEL)• Thresholds: >100 MeV/mg/cm2

• Supply current at low and high state• Dynamic supply current• Input current at high and low state• Output high and low voltages• Tri-state low and high current• Propagation delays and transition times.

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Page 5: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 5

Rad-Hard Quad Receivers

• Radiation hardened RS-422line receiver

• Has CMOS enable pin inputlevels and accepts TTL-levelenable signals

• The two circuits are identicalexcept for the configurationof the logic input buffers

• The HS-26C32RH has thesame input characteristics(impedance, hysteresis,failsafe) as commercial types.

Page 6: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 6

Functional Diagram

Page 7: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 7

Die Characteristics• Die Dimensions: 2140µµµµm x 3290 µµµµm x 533µµµµm ±±±± 25.4µµµµm• Backside Finish: Silicon• Passivation:

– Type: SiO2»Thickness: 800nm ±±±± 100nm

• Metallization:– M1: Mo/TiW

»Thickness: 580nm– M2: Al/Si/Cu

»Thickness: 1000nm ±±±± 100nm• Substrate Potential: Internally connected to VDD• Worst Case Current Density: < 2.0E5 A/cm2

• Transistor Count: 315• Process: Radiation Hardened CMOS, AVLSI

Page 8: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 8

Die Layout

Page 9: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 9

Schematic of the HS-26C(T)32RH inputstructure

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Page 10: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 10

Parasitic Diodes for Each Output

Page 11: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 11

Adequate input differential voltage for open linefault conditions

• Produces too small an input differential voltage in the open-line fault condition

• The internal input bias network is shunted by the terminationresistor

• The internal input bias network is supplemented externally tocompensate for the termination resistor

Page 12: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 12

Input Fail/Safe Differential vs Z in (Open)

Page 13: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 13

Test Setups

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Page 14: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 14

Characteristics of the quiescent powersupply currents

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Supply Current Low State (ICCL) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

ICC

L - (

MA

)

25C-100C-125C

Page 15: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 15

Characteristics of the input current

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Supply Current High State (ICCH) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

ICC

H -

(MA

)

25C-100C-125C

Page 16: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 16

Characteristics of the dynamic supply current

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Dynamic Supply Current (ICCDY) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

ICC

DY

- (M

A)

25C-100C-125C

Page 17: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 17

Characteristics of the input high current

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Input High Current (IIH) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

0.0000.1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.600

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

IIH -

(MA

)

25C-100C-125C

Page 18: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 18

Characteristics of the input low current

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Input Low Current (IIL) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

-0.400

-0.300

-0.200

-0.100

0.0005.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

IIL(m

A) 25C-100C-125C

Page 19: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 19

Characteristics of the output low voltage

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Output Low Voltage (VOL) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

-40.000

-30.000

-20.000

-10.000

0.0005.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

VOL

- (M

V) 25C-100C-125C

Page 20: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 20

Characteristics of the output high voltage

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Output High Voltage (VOH) Versus Temperature & Power Supply

0.0001.0002.0003.000

4.0005.0006.000

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

VOH

- (V

) 25C-100C-125C

Page 21: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 21

Characteristics of the tri-state leakagecurrent for output low

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Tristate Current with Output Low (IOZL) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

-5.000

-4.000

-3.000

-2.000

-1.000

0.0005.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

IOZL

- (N

A)

25C-100C-125C

Page 22: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 22

Characteristics of the tri-state leakagecurrent for output high

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Tristate Current with Output High (IOZH) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

-1.000

0.000

1.000

2.000

3.000

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

IOZH

- (N

A)

25C-100C-125C

Page 23: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 23

Characteristics of the propagation delay timesfrom high to low state

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Propagation Delay High to Low (TPHL) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

0.00020.00040.00060.00080.000

100.000

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

TPH

L - (

NS) 25C

-100C-125C

Page 24: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 24

Characteristics of the propagation delaytimes from low to high state

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Propagation Delay Low To High (TPLH) Versus Temperature and Power Supply Voltage

0.00020.00040.00060.00080.000

100.000120.000

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8V

VCC

TPLH

- (N

S) 25C-100C-125C

Page 25: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 25

Characteristics of the transition times fromhigh to low state

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Transition Time High to Low (TTHL) Versus Temperature & Power Supply Voltage

-0.5000.0000.5001.0001.5002.0002.5003.000

5.5V 5.0V 4.5V 3.6V 3.3V 3.0V 2.8VVCC

TTH

L - (

NS) 25C

-100C-125C

Page 26: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 26

Conclusions

• The test results of the basic parameters of aradiation hardened quad receivers at extreme coldenvironment indicates that the device can be appliedfor the potential application in Mars explorationmissions even at -125 oC if the operatingparameters such as power supply voltages chosenproperly.

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Page 27: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 27

Recommendations

• We do not recommend using this part below 3Vsupply voltage in applications requiring operationdown -125°C.

• The output rise and fall times, tTLH and tTHL, were wellwithin the SMD max limits of 12ns at 5V±10% and15ns at 3.3V ± 10%.

• The parts though exhibited anomalous behavior at theconditions of 2.8V supply voltage and lowtemperatures.

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures

Page 28: Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at …...Characteristics of the input low current Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures Input Low Current (IIL) Versus

Q. Kim/NEPP/05/16/01 28

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to their numerous colleagues including Jose Uribeof JPL for providing technical support for this study. In particular, theauthors would also like to thank their colleagues at JPL for providingsuggestions for the improvement of this device qualification for potentialspace missions. The authors appreciate the support of NASA HQ.

The study described in this report was carried out by the Center for SpaceMicroelectronics Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, CaliforniaInstitute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronauticsand Space Administration. Reference herein to any specific commercialproduct, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, orotherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement by the United StatesGovernment or the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute ofTechnology.

Performance of Rad-Hard Quad Receivers at Extreme Temperatures