Performance-Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)

Federal AviationAdministrationPerformance-Based

Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)Closing remarks

Date: 13-14 May 2013

Presented to: ICAO Asia-Pacific RCP/RSP Workshop (Bangkok, Thailand)

By: Tom [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

APAC RCP/RSP Workshop Closing13-14 May 2013

2Federal AviationAdministration

APAC RCP/RSP Workshop ProgramTime(min)

Session 1 – Understanding RCP/RSP & PBCS Discussion Leader

20 Introductory Remarks Fredric LecatTom Kraft

45 ICAO SARPS – Guidance Paul Radford45 Global Operational Data Link Document (GOLD) Tom Kraft15 Derivation of RCP/RSP specifications Tom Kraft35 Introduction to Performance Based Communication and

Surveillance (PBCS)Paul Radford

30 Qualification of service provision: ANSP and CSP ARINC/SITA30 Qualification of aircraft equipment for certification Jerome Condis15 Operational authorization to use data link Tom Kraft45 Post-Implementation Monitoring Guidance Paul Radford30 Performance monitoring in the Fukuoka FIR Koji Nakaitani20 Interpreting the results Paul Radford10 GOLD Performance Analysis Tool Paul Radford



Safety realization• Benefits come from ATM (e.g. reducing separation minima)

• PBN (e.g. RNP) by itself does NOT give you ATM

• PBCS implementation plays important role in ATM– Recognized problem

– Endorsed GOLD

– Endorsed Regional PBCS implementation plan

– Conduct PBCS workshops

– Implement PBCS in the Region

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

11

22

3NAT Region

APAC Regions

44

5

What is missing?12345

ATMRCPRNP

RSPS

NC



RCP/RSP Workshop Aim – Day 1

• Promote PBCS implementation– What is PBCS and what are RCP and RSP

specifications?– What amendments are being proposed for

Annexes 6 and 11, Doc 4444, Doc 8168, and Doc 9869 to include PBCS provisions?

– What guidance material is provided by GOLD?




• Promote PBCS implementation– How do RCP/RSP specifications relate to C and S

requirements for application of separation minima?

– Why and how does PBCS effectively apply RCP/RSP specifications to ensure safe application of ATM through prescriptive requirements, initial qualification and continued operational safety

– How does post-implementation monitoring, analysis and corrective action improve performance?



APAC RCP/RSP Workshop Program

Time(min)

Session 2 – Planning for PBCS implemenation in the APAC Region

Discussion Leader

30 State of the data link implementation in the South Pacific

Toby Farmer

15 An overview of NAT PBCS Implementation Plan Tom Kraft

45 General Discussion on APAC PBCS Planning and Implementation

Frederic Lecat,Tom Kraft and Paul Radford

15 Wrap-up/ Summary of outcomes Li Peng and Frederic Lecat




• Promote a timely APANPIRG conclusion to endorse an APAC Regional PBCS Implementation Plan– Develop draft plan– To complement APAC Regional

PBN Implementation Plan– Compatible with the global air navigation planning

and performance-based concepts to ensure effective and harmonized PBCS implementation

ATMRCPRNP

RSPS

NC



NAT PBCS implementation planning tasksTASK ID TASK DESCRIPTOR COMPLETE BY LEAD

GENERAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT1 Plan NAT IMG/38 and NAT SPG/47 NAT CNSG2 Target dates NAT IMG/38 and NAT SPG/47 NAT IMG3 RCP/RSP specifications NAT SPG/47 NAT SARSIG4 NAT PBCS Workshop(s) 2012-2013 ICAO/ States

DOCUMENTATION

5 Operational concepts NAT IMG/42and NAT SPG/49NAT ATMG in coordination with CNSG

6 GOLD amendments NAT IMG/42 and NAT SPG/49 GOLD ad-hoc group

7 Contingency procedures NAT IMG/42 and NAT SPG/49 NAT ATMG/ CNSG

8 Restoration of service NAT IMG/42 and NAT SPG/49 NAT ATMG/ CNSG

9 Flight plan requirements

a) NAT IMG/42 and NAT SPG/49 (as part of the NAT SUPPs PfA) and GOLD

b) amend Doc 4444 target date - NAT SPG/50

NAT CNSGICAO (Global)

10 PfA for NAT Regional Supplementary Procedures (NAT SUPPS) NAT IMG/42 and NAT SPG/49 NAT CNSG NAT ATMG

11 AIPs and other State documents supporting NAT SUPPS Consistent with Task 10 States14 GOLD proposal for RCP/RSP compliance determination NAT IMG/42 and NAT SPG/49 CNSG15 GOLD proposal for guidelines on operator eligibility NAT IMG/42 and NAT SPG/49 OPS/AIR

IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES12 ATC automation changes Before the start of operational trials of

RLongSM or RLatSM. NAT ANSPs

13 Confirm actual CPDLC and ADS C performance Prior to operational implementation ANSPs, DLMA, CNSG, SARSIG

AIRWORTHINESS AND OPERATIONAL ELIGIBILITY

16 State regulations and guidance material End of 2014, Prior to operational implementation of RLatSM or RLongSM

SOG, States, ANSPs, Users

POST IMPLEMENTATION TASKS17 Post-implementation monitoring ANSPs, DLMA,

CNSG

Completed On track



APAC PBCS implementation planning

• Did the workshop provide the APAC Region with an understanding of PBCS and RCP/RSP specifications?

• Is there a convincing argument for PBCS implementation in the APAC?– What should be considered in planning for APAC PBCS

implementation?

– What tasks should be identified, who is lead and involved in competing the task and what is the schedule?



APAC PBCS Implementation PlanTASK ID TASK DESCRIPTOR COMPLETE BY LEADGENERAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT1 Plan2 Target dates3 Applicability of RCP/RSP specifications4 PBCS Workshop(s)DOCUMENTATION5 Operational concepts6 GOLD amendments7 Contingency procedures8 Restoration of service9 Flight plan requirements10 PfA for NAT Regional Supplementary Procedures (NAT SUPPS)11 AIPs and other State documents supporting NAT SUPPS14 GOLD proposal for RCP/RSP compliance determination15 GOLD proposal for guidelines on operator eligibilityIMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES12 ATC automation changes13 Confirm actual CPDLC and ADS C performanceAIRWORTHINESS AND OPERATIONAL ELIGIBILITY16 State regulations and guidance materialPOST IMPLEMENTATION TASKS17 Post-implementation monitoring



Are more PBCS workshops needed?

• When and where?



Global

J2011

F M A M J J A S O N DD

Plan update• Target dates • Performance

specifications

J2012

F M A M J J A S O N D J2013

F M A M J J A S O N D J F M

NAT States/ANSPs/DLMA

GOLD, NAT Doc 006/007• ADS-C conformance monitoring• Procedures for reroutes, non-normal

operations• Flight plan indicators for specifications• Operator/aircraft approval guidance update• Technical/monitoring updateGuidance on operational approvalDraft PfA NAT Doc 7030 - RLongSM, RLatSM

Proposed PANS/ATM & Draft GOLD Amendment

GOLD performance monitoring

New York – < 2010 Gander – 1Q/2011Shanwick – 4Q/2010 Santa Maria – 2Q/2011

Reykjavik –3Q/2011

Shannon –1Q/2013Bodo – TBD

6GOLD Jun 2010

12 12 11, 1612

DLMA Jun 2009

Plan DraftJun 2008

NAT SPG/47

NAT SPG/48

NAT SPG/49

RLongSM Trial

Data Link Mandate

State AIPs & other docs

6, 9

Endorsed RCP/RSP

Plan

Proposed GOLD AmendmentNAT Doc 006/007

Draft PfA NAT Doc 7030

12th ANC

Proposed PANS/ATM & GOLD Amendment

6, 9

NAT SPG/49• Adopt GOLD

Amendment • Process PfA

OPLINKPOPLINKP

NAT Groups1, 2, 3 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15 101

6, 10

GOLD AmendmentPfA NAT Doc 7030

4, 13, 174

RCP/RSP Workshops

NAT PBCS implementation schedule (1 of 2)



Global

J2014

F M A M J J A S O N DD J2015

F M A M J J A S O N D J2016

F M A M J J A S O N D J F M

NAT States/ANSPs/DLMA

GOLD performance monitoringState AIP and other documents

Operational readiness

GOLD amendment Jun 2013PANS/ATM amendment Nov 2014

NAT SPG/50

NAT SPG/52

6, 9

NAT Groups

GOLD NAT adoptionPfA NAT Doc 7030

4, 11, 13, 16, 17

17

Coordination

Program management

11, 13, 16 Performance-based

Concept RLongSM

RLatSMNAT

SPG/51

6, 10

9

NAT PBCS implementation schedule (2 of 2)

Performance-Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)

Documents

Transcript of Performance-Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)