Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.
-
Upload
eugene-stanley -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.
![Page 1: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Performance AppraisalTeam 9
Niina Saarinen
Helen Jiang
Miia Wahlroos
Laura Malin
![Page 2: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• What Performance Appraisal Is?
• Purposes
• Development of Appraisal Program
• Training of Appraisers
• Implementation
• Appraisal Interviews
• Conclusions
![Page 3: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What Performance Appraisal Is?
• Evaluation of the employees
• Many different methods
• Not a punitive process
• Linked to company goals
![Page 4: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Administrative Purposes
• Compensation
• HR functions: promotion, transfer, layoff
• HR planning
• “Paper trail”
• Influences employee behavior
=> improves organizational performance
![Page 5: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Developmental Purposes
• Eliminate problems
• New goals
• Training needs
• Individual development – Feedback and discussions– Possibility to improve job performance, not only
evaluate past
![Page 6: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Performance Standards
• Strategic relevance
• Criterion deficiency
• Criterion contamination
• Reliability
![Page 7: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Development of the Program
• Organizational chart
• Cultural characteristics of BP-Centro
• General rating methods
• Sample items of appraisal form
![Page 8: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Cultural Characteristics
• Appraisal - an unfamiliar concept– Traditionally only hard facts measured– Qualitative sides neglected
• Finns tend to be discrete – Avoid negative feedback– Seldom discuss personal traits
• Russians and Baltics are different from Finns
![Page 9: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
General Rating Methods
• Trait Approaches– Graphic rating-scales– Mixed-standard scales– Forced-choice forms – Essay method
• Results Methods– Management by objectives (MBO)
![Page 10: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
General Rating Methods cont.
• Behavioral Methods– Critical incident rating – Behavioral checklist– Behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS)– Behavioral observation scales (BOS)
![Page 11: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Sample Items • General skills
• Management/Leadership skills
Management Skills Actual Requested by position Comments 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 ________
-Planning ________-Organization ________-People development ________-Decision making ________-Control ________
Ranking A B C D E
![Page 12: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Training of Appraisers
• Explain the objectives
• Define the standards
• Avoid misunderstanding
• Reduce biases
• Using the form– Scales and rankings– Comments serve as references for interview
![Page 13: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Implementation
• CEO
• Country and functional mangers
• Regional, facility and assistant facility managers
![Page 14: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
CEO Appraisal
• Annually– Self-appraisal– HQ– Functional managers– Country managers
• Semi-annually– MBO
![Page 15: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MBO
A philosophy of management that has employees establish objectives through consultation with their superiors and then uses these objectives as basis for evaluation.
![Page 16: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
MBO Requirements
• Co-operation
• Objectives easily quantifiable
• The employees can control the process and outcome
• Consistent goals
• Review times specified
![Page 17: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MBO Advantages
• Mutual goal setting
• Reward and promotion decisions
• Objectives defined
• Performance improved
• Co-operation improved
![Page 18: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
MBO Disadvantages
• Time consuming
• Costly
• Some goals difficult to measure
• Hard to get full commitment
![Page 19: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Functional and Country Managers
• Annually– Self-appraisal – 360-degree appraisal
• Semi-annually– MBO
![Page 20: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Regional, Facility and Assistant Facility Managers
• Annually– Self-appraisal
– 360-degree appraisal
![Page 21: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
360-Degree Method
• Appraisal by manager and/or supervisor
• Subordinates
• Peers (teams)
• Customers
![Page 22: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
360-Degree Advantages
• Comprehensive system
• Quality of information
• Lessens bias/prejudice
• Complements TQM
• Increases employee self-development
![Page 23: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
360-Degree Disadvantages
• Administratively complex
• Feedback can be intimidating
• Conflicting opinions
• Invalid evaluations
![Page 24: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
To Ensure Quality and Acceptance
• Assure anonymity
• Use statistical procedures
• Identify and quantity biases
• Make respondents accountable
• Prevent “gaming” of the system
=> Training
![Page 25: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Appraisal Interview
• Training the interviewers
• Data analyzing– HR department
• Face to face conversations– Feedback– Training needs
![Page 26: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Conclusion
• Highly related with compensation plan
• Successful appraisal program can eliminate the misunderstandings between employees
• It helps employee improve their future performance
• It guarantees the achievement of company’s goals.
![Page 27: Performance Appraisal Team 9 Niina Saarinen Helen Jiang Miia Wahlroos Laura Malin.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062715/56649db45503460f94aa53c5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Thank You for Your Attention!
Questions?