คู่มือ การสร้างเว็บไซต์ด้วย WORDPRESS · คู่มือการสร้างเว็บไซต์ด้วย wordpress
Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress
Transcript of Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress
![Page 1: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Penn State Critical Design Review
Project Odyssey
January 25th, 2016
![Page 2: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
• Team introduction• General overview• Structures
– Rocket design
• Avionics and Recovery – Recovery system
• Payload– FOPS– Kiwi
• Propulsion– Motor Choice
• Safety
• Mission Overview– Budget– Timeline
• Conclusion• Appendix
![Page 3: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Team Introduction
• Exec Committee– Luke Georges (President)– Evan Kerr (Vice-President)– Justin Hess (Treasurer)– Laura Reese (Safety Officer)– Brian Lodge (Outreach Chair)
• Structures Subsystem– Anthony Colosi– Kurt Lindhult– Kartik Singhal
• Avionics and Recovery Subsystem– Gretha Dos Santos– Evan Kerr
• Payload– Torre Viola– Daniel Yastishock
• Propulsion Subsystem– Alex Parkhill– Trevor Moser
![Page 4: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Structures − Vehicle Dimensions
● Total Length:
- With Fins: 147” ≅ 12.3’
- Nose Cone Tip to Tail Cone: 146”
● Outer Diameter: 6.079”
● Total Mass = 38.69 lb
![Page 5: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Structures − Mass Statement and Mass Margin
Component Mass (oz)
Nosecone with aluminum tip
40
Airframe 79.7
Acrylic 18.2
FOPS 40
KIWI 19
Avionics Bay 28
Other (motor, fins, Hardware, epoxy)
362.1
● Currently our design
includes 10% margin of
increase which can be
increased or decreased
prior to launch for
unforeseen mass
changes
![Page 6: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Structures − Key Design Features
● Von Karman nosecone
● Aluminum nosecone tip for durability
● External 3D printed fin brackets
● 3/16 inch fiberglass fins
● Blue Tube 2.0 airframe
● 6 inch coupler shoulders
● 3D printed coupler transitions
![Page 7: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Structures − Transitions
![Page 8: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Structures − Stability Margin
● CG: 91.75 inches from the tip of nose cone
● CP: 115 inches from the tip of nose cone
● Static stability margin: 3.8
calibers
● 2.65 calibers off the launch rail
● Rail Exit Velocity: 75.8 ft/s
● Thrust to Weight: 7.83
![Page 9: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Structures − Status of Verification: Structures
● Reusable Launch Vehicle Design
○ Modular & durable components for repair
● Four Section Design with Single Stage
○ Even mass distribution for uniform forces
● Preparation within 4 hours
○ Screws for rapid assembly/diagnostics
![Page 10: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Structures − Upcoming Material Testing
● Tensile Testing with varying
fastener placement
● Creation of 6061 Aluminum bulk
plates for attachment
● Previous Testing on G12
Fiberglass airframe specimen
![Page 11: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Subscale Flight Results
Summary:○ Apogee: 2467 ft○ Descent Time: 95 seconds○ Deployment: Anomaly at apogee
■ Main and drogue deployed■ Too few shear pins in the main coupler
Lessons Incorporated:○ Include more shear pins in main coupler○ Do more extensive ground testing
![Page 12: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Subscale Flight Results
Predicted Descent Profile
Actual Descent Profile
![Page 13: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Avionics Bay Design
Fiberglass board 3D Printed Board Prototype
![Page 14: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Avionics Bay Design
3D Printed board
![Page 15: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Avionics Bay Design
3D Printed Faraday Cage Sleeve
![Page 16: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Wiring Diagram
• Two independent altimeters• Redundant Altimeter will be
at a delay
![Page 17: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Parachute selection
Drogue Main
Parachute Type
18” Classic Elliptical
72” Iris Ultra Standard
Parachute Cd 1.5 2.2
Harness Type ½” Tubular Kevlar
½” Tubular Kevlar
Harness Length
30’ 40’
Charge mass (black powder)
4g 5g
![Page 18: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Deployment Method
![Page 19: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Velocity and Altitude Models
![Page 20: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Kinetic Energy
Section Weight (lbf) Kinetic Energy
(ft*lbs.)
Nosecone 8.40 41.5
Central Body 9.26 45.7
Booster Section 6.72 41.5
Wind Velocity
(mph)
Drift Distance (ft)
0 0
5 768.4
10 1537
15 2305
20 3774
![Page 21: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Avionics and Recovery – Testing
Deployment Charge Testing● Ground test black powder charges prior to launch● Testing occurs at either High Pressure Combustion Lab
(HPCL) or at launch field○ Under supervision from mentor/level 2 NAR member
Avionics Bay Simulations● Use vacuum chamber to test fully integrated avionics bay● Determine pressure port sizes and test for altimeter
functionality prior to launch
![Page 22: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Payload – FOPS Design Overview
● Reservoir balloon fills main
chamber once specimen is
loaded
● Elastic bands restrain holding
chamber movement
● Clear chamber allows for
observation of payload
![Page 23: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Payload – Kiwi Design Overview
● Autogiro design ensures
stability
● GPS and IMU direct Kiwi to
predetermined landing point
● Parachute will be used at
altitude of 100’ or in case of
emergency
● Will be ejected from rocket
at apogee
![Page 24: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Payload – Kiwi Sectional View
![Page 25: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Payload – Kiwi Electronic Schematics
![Page 26: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Payload – Kiwi Electronic Schematics
![Page 27: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Payload – Kiwi Flight Software Flowchart
1
![Page 28: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Payload – Kiwi Flight Software Flowchart
![Page 29: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Payload – Subscale Launch Analysis
● A scoop-shaped corn chip used as a test subject did not survive launch and recovery
● Difficulty loading the chip is considered to be the cause of breakage
● After discussion, a new loading method was determined to be the most likely solution
![Page 30: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Propulsion – Preliminary Motor Selection
Designation Apogee (ft.)
Velocity off rail (ft./s)
Impulse (lbf-s)
Weight (oz.)
Thrust/WeightRatio
Cesaroni L1350 (3 Gr.)
5231 75.8 962 125.92 7.83
The L1350 is the Cesaroni motor that achieves a simulated apogee closest to the goal of 5280 feet.
![Page 31: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Propulsion – Primary Motor (L1350) Thrust Curve
![Page 32: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Propulsion – Full Scale Flight Simulation
![Page 33: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Propulsion – Static Motor Testing
Static Motor Testing
Static Motor Testing will be conducted in the coming weeks for calibration of test equipment.
![Page 34: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Propulsion – Wind Tunnel Testing
Wind tunnel testing will be conducted on a subscale model when space is available.
![Page 35: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Safety – Overview
● All subsystems have created launch checklists to be filled out before subscale and fullscale launches
● Major risks and failure modes were identified and mitigation plans were developed
● Member safety training and lab safety are being improved○ All Leads and Executives have official lab training from the
Penn State Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Office○ All members take online EHS lab safety modules
![Page 36: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Mission Overview - Budget
Expected Costs: 2016-2017
Fullscale $1,776.35
Subscale $277.65
Propulsion $1,183.00
Travel $7,000.00
Outreach $300.00
Miscellaneous
Equipment
$750.82
Total $11,287.82
Expected Income 2016-2017
Aerospace
Engineering
Department
$5,000.00
Mechanical
Engineering
Department
$1,000.00
Samuel A.
Shuman
Endowment in
Engineering
$8,700.00
Club Fundraising $1,500.00
The Boeing
Company
$500.00
Total $16,700.00
![Page 37: Penn State Critical Design Review - WordPress](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061100/629aafde2f3fd4272f7271b6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Questions?