PDS4 Mission Needs Assessment
description
Transcript of PDS4 Mission Needs Assessment
PDS4 Mission Needs Assessment
Reta BeebeDan Crichton
Introduction
• Reta Beebe assigned to review PDS Discipline Node reports to provide an outline for early mission needs for PDS4
• Set up the Data Suppliers’ Working Group (DSWG)• Ed Guinness, Steve Joy, Lyle Huber to develop a plan to identify
needs led by Reta (August 2010 MC F2F)
• Put together a set of specific PDS4 archiving needs for three missions – LADEE, MAVEN, & Phobos-SRM.
• Drivers Identified by the DSWG• data object types used by the types of instruments on these
missions • the timeline with when the missions need the information
• Presented to the MC in November 2010 & March 2011
Considerations
• Upcoming Missions• Types of Instruments• Types of Products• Approximate Start of Product Design• Approximate Delivery Date to PDS• Tool Needs, etc
Results (LADEE)
LADEE/PDS4 Support Update
• LADEE has setup bimonthly telecons of a data working group.
• In an effort to speed up use of PDS4, each team has submitted a representative example of a data file.
• Lyle Huber and Carol Neese/Small Bodies have refined these submissions
• Neese is working closely with the ATMOS node to define the needed data structure
• Lynn Neakrase, Shannon Rees and Matias Roybal have begun developing initial LADEE-tailored schemas and template XML labels using the samples and closely related instrument data files provided by the instrument teams
Results (MAVEN)
MAVEN/PDS4 Support Update
• Draft ICDs came out in April
• MAVEN data management plan was released in June
• No sample products or SIS development discussion has occurred with PPI, but draft SISs due in Nov 2011 with final versions in March 2012
Results (Phobos-Grunt)
Phobos Instrument Details (1)
Phobos Instrument Details (2)
Phobos Instrument Details (3)
Phobos Instrument Details (4)
Phobos/PDS4 Support Update
• Launch is now scheduled for 11 Nov 2011 (11.11.11).
• The data plan was updated and sent back to the mission to review
• SBN planning to go over this fall and do some hands-on workshops on PDS4 label development.
Results (EXOMARS)
Summary
• The mission drivers are the start dates for product design.
• Initial data product support required for a few simple product types (ASCII tables, FITS tables, etc).
• Actual ingestion will not occur until early 2013.• However, short cruise time of LADEE makes it a challenge. Planning
is underway.
• Validation tools along with design assistance to create the products are important.
• Phobos-SRM considered, but instrument needs are still to be analyzed and captured.
• Plan: Keep PDS4 deployments scoped to support LADEE, MAVEN and Phobos-SMR first