McCombs Knowledge To Go - McCombs School of …/media/Files/MSB/Development/Alumni...Certificate in...
Transcript of McCombs Knowledge To Go - McCombs School of …/media/Files/MSB/Development/Alumni...Certificate in...
McCombs
Knowledge To Go
August 11, 2015
Trans-Pacific Partnership:
Potential Impacts
by Dr. Linda V. GerberSenior Lecturer, McCombs School of Business
Director, Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER)
Game Plan
Overview of TPP
Timeline of negotiations
Context for assessment
Criticisms
Benefits
Prospects
What is TPP anyway?
Free Trade Agreement involving twelve
countries
40% of global GDP, 30% of exports and 25% of imports
Eliminates trade barriers (both tariff and non-
tariff) in most goods and services – some
immediately and others over time
Expands/improves existing treaties (i.e.,
NAFTA)
Includes new standards for labor, the
environment, and food safety (among others)
30 chapters in all – plus appendices on
specific exemptions for certain countries
Other key aspects of TPP Specific attention to certain industries
Textiles
Financial services
Telecommunications
Professional services
Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)
Specific attention to certain issues Competition and Market access
Electronic commerce
State-owned enterprises (SOE’s) and Government procurement
Food safety, Labor, Environment
Economic development
Transparency and Anti-corruption
Specific administrative and operational details Rules of Origin, Dispute Settlement, Customs, Business Travel
Separate details on U.S. - Japan trade
Non-binding elements
Many “work together” provisions vs.
actual stipulations
Agricultural export subsidies
Export credits
State trading enterprises
Independent pact on currency
manipulation
Timeline of TPP
Agreement in 2006 between Brunei, Chile, New
Zealand, and Singapore (P4)
In 2008, the U.S. seeks to join negotiations along with
Australia, Peru and Vietnam
Negotiations begin in 2010
2010-2013 Malaysia, Mexico, Canada, and Japan join
the negotiations
Negotiations concluded in October 2015
President Obama must submit documentation to
Congress and sign the agreement
Congress can then move the bill through a specified
process
Other nations must approve as well
Context Status of WTO Doha Round negotiations
Limited progress
No currency manipulation elements
Agricultural subsidy stalemate
Stronger on goods than services
Stronger on tariffs than non-tariffs
U.S. and world trade agreements
U.S.: 14 agreements/20 countries vs. 612 globally
Fast-track authority
also called Trade Promotion Authority (TPA)
Trade agreements have both economic and
political rationale
Context (continued)
Exclusion of China
Secrecy of negotiations and Wiki-leaks
Interesting political ecosystem:
Democratic President and Republican
Congress
(Can TTP bring them together?)
Key Criticisms
From Whom? Business skeptics
Isolationists
Special interests (environment, labor, IP freedom, information
freedom, human rights, etc.)
Anti-Obama forces
Issues Secrecy/Lack of transparency/Unequal access
Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Labor losses (NAFTA experience)
IP protections
Pharmaceuticals/cost of medicines
Copyright
Data privacy
Enforcement
Benefits
Ends U.S. FTA “isolation”
Supports U.S. “pivot to Asia”
Heightens various standards from previous FTAs
Addresses areas of global economic friction absent or
more limited in WTO and other agreements
Agricultural subsidies
Non-tariff barriers
IP protection
Currency manipulation (Maybe…)
Provides incentives for countries to improve
economic policies (both for TPP countries and others who may wish to join)
Bottom line: Reestablishes U.S. leadership in global
commerce
Winners and Losers
Winners
U.S. Financial services
U.S. Shipping/express carriers
Pharmaceutical producers
Agriculture
Services/technology companies
U.S. consumers (?)
Losers
Manufacturing sector
U.S. consumers (?)
Environment
TPP passage and beyond Likely vote after November 2016 election
Between now and then: Expect considerable weigh-in from public interest and business
groups
(devil is in the details...)
Congressional deliberation over next several months
Potential side pacts on critical issues
Some treaty revision on key points
If approved, other countries may enter South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Colombia, Thailand,
Laos, and Indonesia
A little bit about CIBERCenter for International Business Education
and Research
Mission: internationalize business education
Targets:
Students at all levels
Academic community – various levels and areas
Business community
Some current projects
Certificate in Global Management
Business language video library
Cross-cultural analysis
Exporting for entrepreneurs
http://www.utexas.edu/mccombs/Centers/CIBER
Please Give Back to McCombs!
This webinar has been brought to you by the McCombs MBA & BBA Alumni
Advisory Boards, coordinated by alumni for the benefit of the Alumni Network.
Please get involved with the Alumni Network!
All alumni benefit when we work together to build the quality and value of the
Alumni Network and the McCombs brand.
Time: Get involved in your local club
Talent: Mentor another alumni or speak at a future webinar
Treasure: Make a donation to McCombs
www.mccombs.utexas.edu/alumni
Suggested fund: MBA or BBA Alumni Excellence Funds
Please use response code KTG
Online survey link: https://utexas.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_08tYtIFkP2J9ncp
Send me your feedback -- [email protected]
Relative tariff rates – TPP countries
U.S. Goods and Services Trade Balance with TPP Countries
Analysis by CRS. Data from the ITC and the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
*Does not include Brunei, Peru, or Vietnam