PDF (Published Version)

6
Mixing of two fluid streams in a microchannel using the Taylor-Aris dispersion effect Hengzi Wang, Pio Iovenitti, Erol Harvey and Syed Masood Industrial Research Institute Swinburne, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorn,Victoria 3122, Australia ABSTRACT Taylor-Aris dispersion is an unwanted effect in some applications, such as chromatography, because of its rapid dispersion along channel axis direction to cause the difficulties to separation. However, this effect can be used in solving mixing problems. In this presentation, the authors studied mixing of two streams of food dye solution in a microchannel. The two liquids sandwiched in the axis direction, and due to non-slip boundary condition, the slugs of liquids stretched and thus increase their interfacial area. This phenomena was firstly studied by Taylor about the dispersion of solute in a circular capillary, and then improved by Aris. Numerical analysis was applied to design mixing section in microchannels, and simplified experiments were conducted to illustrate the concept. Keywords: Taylor-Aris dispersion, Microfluidics, microchannel, MEMS, micromixer, passive mixing 1. INTRODUCTION It is well known that the Reynolds number is low in typical microfluidic channels, and the flow is laminar under normal conditions, especially for liquids. Therefore, the mixing of two fluid streams in a microchannel relies mainly on diffusion. For a typical microfluidic device, the length scale is too large for a rapid diffusion and too small to include mechanical agitation. It is possible to achieve this by dynamic mixing with the assistance of externally forced mass transport, i.e. Yang et al. 1 used ultrasonic waves to enhance mixing, and Knight 2 described fast mixing by forming and controlling nanoscale, submerged fluids jets. However, it is much easier to control mixing in a laminar flow using a static micromixer. The principle of a static micromixer can be categorized into four types. (a). T-shape micromixer. The T-mixer simply combines two or more fluid streams, which flow parallel to each other in the microchannel, and mixing relies purely on molecular diffusion. 3–6 The T-mixer normally has a small channel width of the order of tens of microns and sufficient channel length. (b). Geometrically splitting and recombining substreams. In this way, large contact surfaces and small diffusion paths are generated (Ehrfeld et al., 7 Schwesinger, et al., 8 Koch et al. 9, 10 ). (c). Chaotic Mixer. Stroock et al. 11 presented this mixer to stretch and fold the streams by rotating the streamline inside the microchannel. The circulation of the streamlines was due to the transverse pressure component created by the anisotropic resistance to viscous flow. Johnson et al. 12 reported similar structures machined by Excimer laser to achieve rapid mixing. However, the obvious drawback for these mixers is the dead volume created by these structures. (d). Altering flow direction laterally. This method tries to create stirring (convective) effects by forcing one fluid stream into another (Liu et al., 13 and He et al. 14 ). Liu’s serpentine-shaped micromixer was more favorable to high Reynolds numbers (70), and He’s in-situ micromixer could alter the flow direction, shrink the channel and divide the main stream into substreams. However, He’s mixer is not likely to be used in a pressure-driven environment, due to the large pressure drop in its packed columns. Taylor and Aris 15, 16 described the dispersion of solute in a circular pipe along the longitudes (axial) direction rather than transverse direction, like many T-type microchannel do. There were also extensive discussions about the Taylor-Aris dispersion in a rectangular Send correspondence to Hengzi Wang: E-mail: [email protected], Telephone: 61 3 9214 4332, Fax: 61 3 9214 5050 Biomedical Applications of Micro- and Nanoengineering, Dan V. Nicolau, Abraham P. Lee, Editors, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 4937 (2002) © 2002 SPIE · 0277-786X/02/$15.00 158

description

taylor

Transcript of PDF (Published Version)

  • Mixing of two uid streams in a microchannel using theTaylor-Aris dispersion eect

    Hengzi Wang, Pio Iovenitti, Erol Harvey and Syed Masood

    Industrial Research Institute Swinburne,Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218,

    Hawthorn,Victoria 3122, Australia

    ABSTRACT

    Taylor-Aris dispersion is an unwanted eect in some applications, such as chromatography, because of its rapiddispersion along channel axis direction to cause the diculties to separation. However, this eect can be usedin solving mixing problems. In this presentation, the authors studied mixing of two streams of food dye solutionin a microchannel. The two liquids sandwiched in the axis direction, and due to non-slip boundary condition,the slugs of liquids stretched and thus increase their interfacial area. This phenomena was rstly studied byTaylor about the dispersion of solute in a circular capillary, and then improved by Aris. Numerical analysis wasapplied to design mixing section in microchannels, and simplied experiments were conducted to illustrate theconcept.

    Keywords: Taylor-Aris dispersion, Microuidics, microchannel, MEMS, micromixer, passive mixing

    1. INTRODUCTION

    It is well known that the Reynolds number is low in typical microuidic channels, and the ow is laminar undernormal conditions, especially for liquids. Therefore, the mixing of two uid streams in a microchannel reliesmainly on diusion. For a typical microuidic device, the length scale is too large for a rapid diusion andtoo small to include mechanical agitation. It is possible to achieve this by dynamic mixing with the assistanceof externally forced mass transport, i.e. Yang et al.1 used ultrasonic waves to enhance mixing, and Knight2

    described fast mixing by forming and controlling nanoscale, submerged uids jets. However, it is much easierto control mixing in a laminar ow using a static micromixer. The principle of a static micromixer can becategorized into four types. (a). T-shape micromixer. The T-mixer simply combines two or more uid streams,which ow parallel to each other in the microchannel, and mixing relies purely on molecular diusion.36 TheT-mixer normally has a small channel width of the order of tens of microns and sucient channel length. (b).Geometrically splitting and recombining substreams. In this way, large contact surfaces and small diusionpaths are generated (Ehrfeld et al.,7 Schwesinger, et al.,8 Koch et al.9, 10). (c). Chaotic Mixer. Stroock etal.11 presented this mixer to stretch and fold the streams by rotating the streamline inside the microchannel.The circulation of the streamlines was due to the transverse pressure component created by the anisotropicresistance to viscous ow. Johnson et al.12 reported similar structures machined by Excimer laser to achieverapid mixing. However, the obvious drawback for these mixers is the dead volume created by these structures.(d). Altering ow direction laterally. This method tries to create stirring (convective) eects by forcing oneuid stream into another (Liu et al.,13 and He et al.14). Lius serpentine-shaped micromixer was more favorableto high Reynolds numbers ( 70), and Hes in-situ micromixer could alter the ow direction, shrink the channeland divide the main stream into substreams. However, Hes mixer is not likely to be used in a pressure-drivenenvironment, due to the large pressure drop in its packed columns. Taylor and Aris15, 16 described the dispersionof solute in a circular pipe along the longitudes (axial) direction rather than transverse direction, like manyT-type microchannel do. There were also extensive discussions about the Taylor-Aris dispersion in a rectangular

    Send correspondence to Hengzi Wang: E-mail: [email protected], Telephone: 61 3 9214 4332, Fax: 61 3 9214 5050

    Biomedical Applications of Micro- and Nanoengineering, Dan V. Nicolau, Abraham P. Lee, Editors, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 4937 (2002) 2002 SPIE 0277-786X/02/$15.00

    158

  • channel.17, 18 From these discussions, it is generally accepted that the apparent diusion coecient D (Taylorsdispersivity) in a rectangular channel can be described in equation (1),

    D = D +1210

    u2W 2

    Df(

    h

    W) (1)

    where D is the molecular diusion coecient, W is the width of the channel, u is the mean velocity in thechannel, h is the height of the channel and f is the geometric function of a rectangular channel, decided bythe height to width aspect ratio h/W . It is surprisingly that the geometric function f is not unity,18 instead,f = 7.95 while h/w 0. For a Taylor dispersivity D, the length between the dispersed leading and trailingedges of slug, lm, shall be estimated by equation (2) developed by Einstein when he studied Brownian motion,19

    lm =2dt (2)

    Taylor dispersivity D is much large than the molecular diusivity D, therefore, for a xed width d of a channel,the mixing time t is reduced.

    2. EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL DESIGNS

    2.1. Numerical setupWhile experiments can illustrate the dispersion a slug of solute in a microchannel and reveal that it is quickerthan pure diusion, numerical simulations can explain some details better and also save time. A straight channelwas modelled numerically using the computational uid dynamic (CFD) software package MemCFD r v2001.3dfrom Coventor. Flow visualization was performed with Coventor visualizer.20 MemCFD r uses a nite volumemethod to solve the Navier-Stokes equations. The channels were meshed into 8-nodes hexahedral elements. Thesimulation was run as transient (steady for studying obstacles in a microchannel), laminar, Newtonian, with 2uids to evaluate the dispersion of one uid in another. The inlets were assigned ow rate boundary condition,and all the channel walls were assigned wall boundary condition (velocity components: vi = 0, i = 1 3). Fluidproperties were calculated and consistent with the uids used in the experiments. In this case, low concentrationof food coloring dyes in water solutions were used.The length, width and height of the channels were 2mm, 200 m and 100m respectively. Simulations wereperformed on Win NT4.0 with Pentium III 800MHz CPU and 512MB memory.

    2.2. Experimental Setups

    Plane of uniformity

    & Mask

    Lens Array Homogenizer

    Input Beam248 nm (KrF) or 193nm (ArF)

    Projection Lens

    Workpiece step motion

    Figure 1. Excimer micromachining

    The microuidic channel was fabricated in the microtechnology laboratory in the Industrial Research Insti-tute of Swinburne (Hawthorn, AU). An Excimer Laser (ExiTech) was used to create the channels. The standard

    Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4937 159

  • Figure 2. Section of Y-channel machined in Polycarbonate by Excimer Laser

    1sec

    2sec

    5sec

    8sec

    10sec

    12sec

    15sec

    18sec

    20sec

    Figure 3. Taylor dispersion along a straight channel: numerical simulation for various time intervals

    operation procedures can be found in early papers of the laboratory.21 The UV laser beam, with a wavelengthof 248nm, projected through the designed features on a chrome-on-quartz mask, and then the laser beam isfocused to pattern the feature on the substrate (Figure 1 ). The Excimer laser machined structures have adepth resolution of the order of 0.1m and spatial resolutions of the order of 1m or better.

    Figure 2 shows the Excimer laser ablated Y-channel on a polycarbonate substrate. Then, the channel waspackaged in a lamination process, a thin PET foil coated with a melting adhesive layer was pressed by a heatedlamination roller onto the structure as the lid. Melinex r Polyester lm type 301 (Dupont Teijin lms), 30min thickness was used in our fabrication, and the lamination equipment was MEGA dry lm laminator model305 (Mega Electronics).The aqueous solutions, one was mixture of water, 2.4% food dye E102 and E122(Yellow), and another one wasmixture of water and 2.1% food dye E133 (blue)(Queen Fine Foods Pty Ltd, Australia), were introduced to thechannel by capillary eects, and the solute plug was pumped into the channel by a syringe. Flow rates weremeasured by weighing the uid collected at the outlet of the channel. Viscosity of the food dye/water solutionwas estimated approximately the same as water. Diusion coecient was calculated according to the chemicalgroups.22

    160 Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4937

  • 500m 500m

    Figure 4. The solute dispersed at, (a) time t1 and (b) time t2

    3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Analytical results can evaluate Taylors dispersivity for rectangular channels with dierent depth to width aspectratio.17 The transient behavior of most practical applications are much easier to interpret through numericalsimulations. In Figure 3, a time series of mass fraction of uid 1 dispersed in uid 2 for a time period of 20 sec-onds. To calibrate with the conditions for analytical interpretation, the Reynolds number was low (Re = 0.005)for diusion to sample all the streamlines.16 It is quite clear that the length of the dispersed uid is longerthan a pure diusion, because of the convective spreading of uid physically. As Taylors dispersivity coecientis a function of mean velocity, D = f(u), it is quite intuitive to have a large ow rate for a quick mixing. Thisis dierent from Taylors original study of dispersion of soluble matter in solvent owing slowly.16 However,in most practical applications, it is not necessary to have a slow motion. As a matter of fact, the velocity isusually higher and has a parabolic shape. While velocity becomes larger, there will be less time for the diusionto sample all the streamlines. In Figure 4, the green region was the mixed uids between uid 1 (yellow) and 2(blue). And there were two transition regions between the yellow/green and green/blue, where the uids beganto diuse into each other. The dispersed solute was initially a narrow parabolic shape at time t1, and thendeveloped into a wider parabolic shape at time t2 in a short distance. Although there is lack of quantitativemeasurement for evaluating the mixed volume of the two uids, the enlarged area of mixed green region andlengthened parabolic shape indicated the enhance of mixing. Nevertheless, numerical simulation agreed withexperiments qualitatively and can be used to access the quality of the mixing. More structured mesh withhigher density of elements can reduce numerical diusion and improve the accuracy, whenever computer re-source allows.It was eective to inject one slug into the main stream of uids for certain analysis. It is ideal to create a seriesof sandwiched slugs of uids proportional to each other according to specication of microuidic mixers. To doit, a dynamic system is required, i.e. a membrane switch or a periodic micropump.The concept of Taylor-Ariss dispersion can be shifted to a more broad way of interpretation, such as usingobstacles in the channel to disrupt ow and create transverse component of ow,23 which is brought into themain stream in the longitudinal direction. It suggested that convection happened in the both the longitudinaldirection and transverse direction. It is dierent from the conventional Taylor-Aris dispersion which requireslow motion and limited to one-dimension, the ow pattern in a microchannel with obstacles was not exactlyslug-like and can be two-dimension or three-dimension.

    4. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK

    Simple microchannels were fabricated and dispersion of slugs of solute was experimentally and numericallyinvestigated. It is dicult to apply dynamic systems to create sandwiched slugs in the channel. Alternatively,obstacles can be a passive approach to create convective eects, which in principle is similar to Taylor-Arisdispersion.

    Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4937 161

  • Optimising various geometric parameter of obstacles were conducted to create more eective convection, andwill be reported elsewhere. In the meantime, it will be a promising solution to microuidic application byapplying dynamic systems to introduce sandwiched slugs to create complete mixing.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Microtechnology forthe support in this research project. Dr. Rowan Deam also provided very helpful discussions.

    REFERENCES1. Z. Yang, H. Goto, M. Matsumoto, and R. Maeda, Active micromixer for microuidic systems using lead-

    zirconate-titanate(pzt)-generated ultrasonic vibration, Electrophoresis 21(1), pp. 116119, 2000.2. J. B. Knight, A. Vishwanath, J. P. Brody, and R. H. Austin, Hydrodynamic focusing on a silicon chip:

    Mixing nanoliters in microseconds, Physical Review Letters 80(17), pp. 38633866, 1998.3. A. Kamholz and P. Yager, Theoretical analysis of molecular diusion in pressure driven laminar ow in

    microuidic channels., Biophysical Journal 80(1), pp. 155160, 2001.4. A. E. Kamholz, B. H. Weigl, B. A. Finlayson, and P. Yager, Quantitative analysis of molecular interaction

    in a microuidic channel: the t-sensor, Analytical Chemistry 71(23), pp. 53405347, 1999.5. S. C. Jacobson, T. E. McKnight, and J. M. Ramsey, Microuidic devices for electrokinetically driven

    parallel and serial mixing, Analytical Chemistry 71(20), pp. 44554459, 1999.6. A. E. Kamholz, E. A. Schilling, and P. Yager, Optical measurement of transverse molecular diusion in a

    microchannel, Biophysical Journal 80(4), pp. 19671972, 2001.7. H. L. Wolfgang Ehrfeld, Volker Hessel, Microreactors: New Technology for Modern Chemistry, John Wiley

    & Sons, 2000.8. N. Schwesinger, T. Frank, and H. Wurmus, Modular microuid system with an integrated micromixer,

    Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 6(1), pp. 99102, 1996.9. M. Koch, D. Chatelain, A. Evans, and A. Brunnschweiler, Two simple micromixers based on silicon,

    Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 8(2), pp. 123126, 1998.10. M. Koch, H. Witt, A. Evans, and A. Brunnschweiler, Improved characterization technique for micromix-

    ers, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 9(2), pp. 156158, 1999.11. A. D. Stroock, S. K. W. Dertinger, A. Ajdari, I. Mezic, H. A. Stone, and G. M. Whitesides, Chaotic mixer

    for microchannels, Science 295(5555), pp. 647651, 2002.12. T. J. Johnson, D. Ross, and L. E. Locascio, Rapid microuidic mixing, Analytical Chemistry 74(1),

    pp. 4551, 2002.13. R. H. Liu, M. A. Stremler, K. V. Sharp, M. G. Olsen, J. G. Santiago, R. J. Adrian, H. Aref, and D. J.

    Beebe, Passive mixing in a three-dimensional serpentine microchannel, Journal of MicroelectromechanicalSystems 9(2), pp. 190197, 2000.

    14. B. He, B. J. Burke, X. Zhang, R. Zhang, and F. E. Regnier, A picoliter-volume mixer for microuidicanalytical systems, Analytical Chemistry 73(9), pp. 19427, 2001.

    15. R. Aris, On the dispersion of a solute in a uid owing through a tube, Proceeding of the Royal Societyof London, series A (Mathematical and Physical Science) 235, pp. 6777, 1956.

    16. G. Taylor, Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent owing slowly through a tube, Proceeding of the RoyalSociety of London, series A (Mathematical and Physical Science) 219, pp. 186203, 1953.

    17. D. Dutta and D. T. Leighton, Dispersion reduction in pressure driven ow through microetched channels,Analytical Chemistry 73(3), pp. 504513, 2001.

    18. P. Chatwin and S. P.J., The eect of aspect ratio on longitudinal diusivity in rectangular channels,Journal of Fluid Mechanics 120, pp. 347358, 1982.

    19. A. Einstein, On the motion of small particles suspended in liquids, Annalen der Physik 17, pp. 549560,1905.

    20. CoventorWare, Coventorware users manual, 2001.1, 2001.

    162 Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4937

  • 21. E. Harvey, J. Hayes, B. Dempster, T. Mackin, and R. Scholten, Excimer laser ablation used for thefabrication of micro-optic phase and diraction elements, in Proceedings of SPIE: Micro-Opto-Electro-Mechanical System, pp. 152158, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, (Glasgow. UK),2000.

    22. R. C. Reid, J. M. Prausnitz, and B. E. Poling, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, McGraw-Hill, Inc.,4th ed., 1987.

    23. H. Wang, P. Iovenitti, E. Harvey, and S. Masood, Optimizing layout of obstacles for enhanced mixing inmicrochannels, Smart Materials and Structures 11(5), pp. 662667, 2002.

    Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4937 163