PC1 Edible Oil Final
-
Upload
farhat-durrani -
Category
Documents
-
view
235 -
download
0
Transcript of PC1 Edible Oil Final
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
1/37
1
P.C.1
1. Name of the ProjectIndicate name of the project.
Enhancement of Edible Oil through Sowing
of Canola in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
2. Location Provide name of District/Province. Swabi, Mardan, Buner, Lakki
Marwat,DIKhan, Tank, Bannu, Karak and
Haripur Districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Attach a map of the area, clearlyindicating the projects location.
Map Attached.
3. Authorities responsible for:i. Sponsoring. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Agriculture Livestock & Cooperation
Department.
ii. Execution. Agriculture (Extension) Department KhyberPakhtunkhwa.
iii. Operation and Maintenance. District Officers Agriculture of the ProjectDistrict(s) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
iv. Concerned Federal Ministry. Not applicable.4. (a) Plan Provision.
If the project is included in themedium term/five year plan, specify
actual allocation.
The project is reflected in the ADP 2011-12
with an allocation of Rs. 9.000 million and
project cost as Rs. 20.000 million.
If not included in the current plan, whatwarrants its inclusion and how is it now
proposed to be accommodated.
Not Applicable.
If the project is proposed to be financedout of block provision, indicate:
Total Block ProvisionAmount Already
Committed.
Amount proposed for
this project.Balance available.
N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
2/37
2
(b) Provision in the current PSDP/ADP. The project is included in theADP 2011-12 at
serial No. 580-110123 with an allocation of
Rs. 9.000 million.
5. Project objectives. The objectives of the sector/sub sector
as indicated in the medium term/five
year plan be reproduced. Indicate
objectives of the project and develop
a linkage between the proposed
project and sectoral objectives.
The need for agricultural and rural information
and advisory services is likely to intensify in the
foreseeable future. In most of the world,
agriculture faces the challenge of keeping pace
with rapidly increasing population with few
reserves of potentially cultivable land. Farmers
will have to become more efficient and
specialized.
The main goal of agriculture extension is
dissemination of better agriculture practices
through a number of effective methods whichdivert the farming community from indigenous
practices to the improved/developed modern
techniques. Demonstration is the main tool to
fetch the goals.
Specific objectives of the project are laying out of
canola demonstration plots in the farmers field tomotivate the community in adoption of oil seed
production reducing import bill spending on
edible oil imports.
To cut the import bill on edible oil and to
maintain equilibrium between demand & supply,
it is essential to motivate the farming community
for accommodating edible oil crops in their
cropping pattern.
Specific objectives of the project are:
S.No. Item Unit 2011-12 2012-13 Total
i. Swabi 85 100 185
ii. Mardan 85 100 185iii. Buner 80 120 200
iv. Lakki Marwat 85 120 205
v. DIKhan 90 120 210
vi. Tank 85 120 205
vii. Bannu 90 100 190
viii. Karak 90 100 190
ix. Haripur 90 100 190
780 980 1760
1 Laying out of Canola D/Plots in:
Acres
Total :
S.No. Item Unit 2011-12 2012-
13
1 Laying out of Canola D/Plots in:
i. Swabi Acres 120 130
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
3/37
3
ii. Mardan 120 130 250
iii. Buner 135 140 275
iv. Lakki Marwat 135 140 275
v. DIKhan 135 140 275
vi. Tank 122 132 254vii. Bannu 122 132 254
viii. Karak 122 132 254
ix. Haripur 122 132 254
Total
:
1133 1208 2341
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
4/37
4
In case of revised Projects, indicateobjectives of the project, if different
from original P.C.1.
Not applicable.
6. Description and justification ofproject.
Describe the project and indicateexisting facilities in the area and
justify the establishment of the
Project.
Pakistan is a net importer of oil seeds and
edible oils. Domestic production of edible
oils is sufficient to meet only 25% of the total
demand. Domestic oil seed production
includes cotton seed, sunflower seed and
rapeseed. During 2010 the harvested oil seed
production was 4.7 million metric tonnes.
The domestic production of edible oils is
critically insufficient to meet the demand of
growing population. The deficiency of 75%
in the demand of edible oil is met out from
import which increases our import bill by
billions of dollars. There is an intensive need
to increase domestic product of edible oil so
the import bill may be cut to short.
To get the rid of this problem, department
envisaged to promote canola crop cultivation
in the province.
Major oilseed crops are classified into two
groups namely traditional and no traditional.
Cotton, rapeseed/mustard, groundnut and
sesame include in traditional oil seeds while
sunflower and canola are included in non-
traditional oilseeds. Rapeseed/mustard,
sunflower and canola are important oilseed
crops after cottonseed, which contribute
approximately 7%, 32% and 10% in the total
domestic edible oil production, respectively.
Existing Facilities
Technical staff is available at each District
with mobility to access the target group of the
project.
Provide technical parameters i.e. inputand output of the project in quantitative
terms. Also discuss the technology
aspects of the project.
With the help of this project an area of
about 1785 Acres will be brought under
canola crop. The demonstration plots
would be laid out in the farmers field.The project will provide the beneficiary
with a pale of seed, chemical fertilizer
and pesticides for the spray.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
5/37
5
From this area farmers will fetch 890.56
metric ton of canola produce (445.28
tonnes/annum).
Per Acre Input Requirements and their Cost.
Unit Qty Unit Cost Amount
Seed Kgs 2 Rs. 160 320
DAP bag 1.5 Rs. 4,000 6,000
Urea bag 2 Rs. 1,500 3,000
Spray Nos. 2 Rs. 600 1,200
Toal : 10,520
Seed Requirements
Area in
Acr.
Seed
Rate/Acr
(in Kgs)
Required Qty
of Seed (in
Kgs.)
Area in
Acr.
Seed
Rate/Acr
(in Kgs)
Required
Qty of Seed
(in Kgs.)
1 Swabi 85 170 100 200 370
2 Mardan 85 170 100 200 370
3 Buner 80 160 120 240 400
4 Lakki Marwat 85 170 120 240 410
5 DIKhan 90 180 120 240 420
6 Tank 85 170 120 240 410
7 Bannu 90 180 100 200 380
8 Karak 90 180 100 200 380
9 Haripur 90 180 100 200 380
Total : 780 1560 980 1960 3520
S.No.2011-12 Total
Required
Qty. in
Kgs.
2012-13
2 2
District Seed Requirements/Input (in Kgs)
Fertilizer Requirements
DAP Urea DAP Urea DAP Urea Total1 Swabi 127.5 170.0 150.0 200.0 277.5 370.0 647.5
2 Mardan 127.5 170.0 150.0 200.0 277.5 370.0 647.5
3 Buner 120.0 160.0 180.0 240.0 300.0 400.0 700.0
4 Lakki Marwat 127.5 170.0 180.0 240.0 307.5 410.0 717.5
5 DIKhan 135.0 180.0 180.0 240.0 315.0 420.0 735.0
6 Tank 127.5 170.0 180.0 240.0 307.5 410.0 717.5
7 Bannu 135.0 180.0 150.0 200.0 285.0 380.0 665.0
8 Karak 135.0 180.0 150.0 200.0 285.0 380.0 665.0
9 Haripur 135.0 180.0 150.0 200.0 285.0 380.0 665.0
Total : 1,170.0 1,560.0 1,470.0 1,960.0 2,640.0 3,520.0 6,160.0
S.No. District Fertilizer Requirements (in bags)
2011-12 2012-13 Total
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
6/37
6
Output of the Project:
The project will fetch increased oil seed crops production from the demonstration plots
to be laid out in the farmers fields. The quantitative output of the project in term of
produce is estimated as:
2011-12 2012-13 Total
Swabi 43.01 50.60 93.61
Mardan 43.01 50.60 93.61
Buner 40.48 60.72 101.20
Lakki Marwat 43.01 60.72 103.73
DIKhan 45.54 60.72 106.26
Tank 43.01 60.72 103.73
Bannu 45.54 50.60 96.14
Karak 45.54 50.60 96.14
Haripur 45.54 50.60 96.14
Total : 394.68 495.88 890.56
District Expected Produce (@ 506 kgs/ha.) in M.Tonnes
2011-12 2012-13 Total
Swabi 6881.60 8096.00 14977.60
Mardan 6881.60 8096.00 14977.60
Buner 6476.80 9715.20 16192.00
Lakki Marwat 6881.60 9715.20 16596.80
DIKhan 7286.40 9715.20 17001.60
Tank 6881.60 9715.20 16596.80
Bannu 7286.40 8096.00 15382.40
Karak 7286.40 8096.00 15382.40
Haripur 7286.40 8096.00 15382.40
Total : 63148.80 79340.80 142489.60
District Oil extraction from 40% of the product (in litters)
From the above quoted produce canola oil would be extracted at a ratio of 40% of the produce
so the farming community will fetch 71244.80 litters canola oil per annum which would fetch
an income of Rs. 8.550 million per annum at an average. Besides that canola cakes to be
obtained would also be used as by product to the domestic animals as fattening factor which
resultantly increase meat/beef ratio by 10~15% .
Provide details of civil works,equipment, machinery and other
physical facilities required for the
project.
Physical facilities to be required for the
project have already been mentioned above.
The seed, fertilizers and pesticides would be
procured for further distribution amongst the
beneficiaries. The beneficiaries are required
to provide the project with usage of
agriculture implements required for sowing
and harvesting of the crop; implements to be
used for plant protection measures.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
7/37
7
The plots would be allotted under a
mechanism to be devised in convenience of
the farming community and service providers.
For the purpose, beneficiary will have to
provide with an under taking (specimen at the
end of the paper), that he will abide by theadvices / guidelines extended by the
agriculture department / experts from time to
time. He will have to utilize the quantity of
the produce proposed / recommended by
agriculture department by him while rest of
the produce (if any) will be disposed off
through sale to oil seed development board or
agriculture development fund (what the case
may be).
Indicate governance issues of the sectorrelevant to the project and strategy to
resolve them.
The farming community / beneficiaries
should have to be bound for disposal of the
produce as per instructions of the
agriculture department (extension wing).
The farmer at itself doesnt act accordingly
the instructions and feel himself at liberty to
handle the produce at his will. The fruit of
the project, in this way does not appear to
be projected before the rest of the
community. So to solve the problem, it is
proposed that before allotment of a plot, the
beneficiary would have to provide thedepartment with an undertaking that he will
abide by the guidelines issued by the
department from time to time and would be
bound to dispose his produce off under the
instruction of the department.
Agriculture Production:
For fisheries projects: Give area forfishing and the legal rights to that area;
the availability of trawlers; amountand type of fish likely to be available.
Not applicable.
For Forestry projects: Indicate natureand state of existing forests their
growth rate and any problems
connected therewith. Give details of
species; rotation and anticipated
rotation and volume yield. Indicate
availability of complementary
services, e.g. access roads, saw millsetc.
Not applicable.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
8/37
8
For Agriculture Production Projects:Give present and future crop yield,
cropping intensity; land use pattern
technological intervention and the
basis for calculation of the futureoutput.
According to Economic Survey of Pakistan
2010-11, during 2009-10 canola crop was
grown over an area of about 233000 acres
with production of 131000 tonnes seed.
Present situation is not encouraging one.The manifesto of project is to enhance
edible oil area and production. With the
help of this project 1760 acre area will be
brought under canola cultivation which
would fetch 890.56 tonnes of its produce. If
10% of the produce is utilized as canola
seed for further cultivation, it will bring
44528 acres more area under canola.
For all agriculture production sectorprojects, provide
(i) Transport, equipment and fieldmachinery available with the
department.
Road worthy vehicle are available with the
District Officers of Agriculture in the project
District. Besides that Agriculture Officers and
Field Assistant have motorbikes for visit and
supervision of the project activities.
(ii) Effect on farm income andbasis for pricing of outputs.
From the produce canola oil would be
extracted at a ratio of 40% of the produce so
the farming community of Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa will fetch 71244.80 litters
canola oil per annum which would fetch an
income of Rs. 11.399 million per annum at
an average. Besides that canola cakes to be
obtained would also be used as by product
to the domestic animals as fattening factor
which resultantly increase meat/beef ratio
by 10~15%.
(iii) Farm gate and internationalprices.
The project will bring an area of about 1760
Acres under canola crop. The expectedyield per acre is estimated as 890.550
tonnes during 2 years i.e. project period. If
it is sold @ Rs. 160/- p.killogram or Rs.
0.160 million per tones the farmer will fetch
Rs. 142.490 million of Rupees from its
produce.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
9/37
9
Agriculture Extension;
Provide history of extension work inand around project area an justify the
extension work.
Agriculture Extension system is an out of
school education system. It has its mandate
viz improving living standard of farmingcommunity through increase in farm income
by perceiving potential output with an
acceptable quality on sustainable basis.
Agriculture Extension department have
following functions to attend.
1. Dissemination of recommendedagricultural practices.
2. Educate/Train farmers in improvedagricultural production technology.
3. Production and distribution ofquality seed and fruit plants.
4. Advisory services in insect/pestmanagement & horticultural
activities.
5. Organize farmers for collectivesolution of agricultural problems.
6. Quality control and regulatorymeasures of Agricultural inputs.
7. Establish & Develop MarketInformation System (MIS) &
Establishment of Regulated Markets
in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
8. Execution of various cropsIntroduction & Promotion
Programme.
For adoption of modern agriculture
techniques farming community should have
motivated to shift from indigenous methods
to modern track. For the purpose meetingswith the community are arranged, lectures
are delivered but the most effective tool is
laying out of demonstration plots, holding
of field days, arranging workshops and
seminars, exposure visits, experience
sharing workshops etc.
In the history of agriculture extension, there
is a long queue of progress. The efforts
made by Agriculture Extension Work Force
lead the nation towards prosperity and self
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
10/37
10
sufficiency in food grains despite the global
challenges of food insecurity.
Provide transport, equipment and fieldmachinery etc available with the
department.
The Department has had provided its
Agriculture Officers/Field Assistants with
motorbikes on ownership. The cost of these
bikes are recovered in easy installmentswithout any extra charges. So projects
provide them with POL / maintenance of
their vehicle and they use this transport for
official touring, field visits, execution and
operational activities of the development
projects.
As far as matter of equipments is
concerned, most of the Model Farm
Services Centers have agriculture
equipments to provide it to its registeredmembers as well as un registered farming
community of that respective district. These
farm equipments are provided on nominal
rental. The cost charged is used for
maintenance of those equipments.
Anyhow, arrangements of equipments and
farm machinery is sole responsibility of the
beneficiary either he own or get on rental.
Industry, Commerce and Minerals:
Provide installed capacity, proposedexpansion and available technologies,
the selected technology and reason for
its selection.
Not Applicable.
Whether the output is meant for:(i) Import substitution. Not applicable.(ii) Meeting domestic demand or Not applicable(iii) Export oriented. Not applicable.
In case of export, give likely marketsand their size, competitive prices and
cost of production to justify the project.
Not applicable.
Provide all information under with andwithout project conditions in case of
BMR and expansion projects.
Not applicable.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
11/37
11
7. Capital Cost Estimates. Indicate date of estimation of project
cost estimate.
August, 2011.
Basis of determining the capital cost beprovided. It includes market survey,
schedule rates, estimation on the basis
of previous work done etc.
Market prevailing rates.
Provide year-wise estimation ofphysical activities:
Year wise / component wise physical activities
S.No. Item Unit 2011-12 2012-13 Total
i. Swabi 85 100 185
ii. Mardan 85 100 185
iii. Buner 80 120 200
iv. Lakki Marwat 85 120 205
v. DIKhan 90 120 210
vi. Tank 85 120 205vii. Bannu 90 100 190
viii. Karak 90 100 190
ix. Haripur 90 100 190
780 980 1760
1 Laying out of Canola D/Plots in:
Acres
Total :
Phasing of capital cost be worked out on the basis of each item of work as statedabove and provide as per following:
2011-12 2012-13
A03805 Travelling Allow Rs. 0.450 Rs. 0.628 Rs. 1.078
A03827 POL Charges Rs. 0.344 Rs. 0.586 Rs. 0.930
Inputs for D/Plots
Cost of Seed 0.250Rs. 0.361Rs. 0.610Rs.
Cost of Fetilizer
i. DAP 4.680Rs. 5.382Rs. 10.062Rs.
ii. Urea 2.340Rs. 2.691Rs. 5.031Rs.
Cost of spray 0.936Rs. 1.352Rs. 2.288Rs.G.Total of the Scheme 9.000Rs. 11.000Rs. 20.000Rs.
Code No. Classification Cost (in Mill Rs.) Total
A09370
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
12/37
12
In case of revised projects,provide:
Project is new one.
Project approved history alongwith PSDP allocations, releases
and expenditure.
Not applicable.
Item-wise, year-wise actualexpenditure and Physical
Progress.
Not applicable.
Justification for revision of PC-1and variation in scope of project
if applicable.
Not applicable.
Item-wise comparison of revisedcost with the approved cost and
give reason for variation.
Not applicable.
Exchange rate used to work outFEC in the original and revised
P.C.1s.
Not applicable
8. Annual Operational Cost. Item-wise annual operating cost
based on proposed capacity
utilization for 5 years.
A. Five years summary of the Operational Cost2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
A03805 Travelling Allow Rs. 0.544 Rs. 0.626 Rs. 0.720 Rs. 0.828 Rs. 0.952 Rs. 3.669
A03827 POL Charges Rs. 0.432 Rs. 0.497 Rs. 0.571 Rs. 0.657 Rs. 0.755 Rs. 2.912
Inputs for D/Plots
Cost of Seed Rs. 0.304 Rs. 0.349 Rs. 0.402 Rs. 0.462 Rs. 0.531 Rs. 2.048
Cost of Fetilizer
i. DAP Rs. 5.487 Rs. 6.310 Rs. 7.257 Rs. 8.345 Rs. 9.597 Rs. 36.997
ii. Urea Rs. 2.744 Rs. 3.155 Rs. 3.628 Rs. 4.173 Rs. 4.799 Rs. 18.499
Cost of spray Rs. 1.139 Rs. 1.310 Rs. 1.506 Rs. 1.732 Rs. 1.992 Rs. 7.679
G.Total of the Scheme 10.650Rs. Rs. 12.247 Rs. 14.084 Rs. 16.197 Rs. 18.626 Rs. 71.804
Code No. Classification Cost (in Mill Rs.) Total
A09370
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
13/37
13
B. Component Wise Cost.i. Seed Cost:
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 Swabi 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087
2 Mardan 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087
3 Buner 0.049 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.085 0.104
4 Lakki Marwat 0.049 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.085 0.104
5 DIKhan 0.049 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.085 0.104
6 Tank 0.049 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.085 0.104
7 Bannu 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087
8 Karak 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087
9 Haripur 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087
Total Input Cost: 0.397 0.456 0.525 0.603 0.694 0.853
S.No. District Seed Cost (Rs. In Million) Total Seed
ii. Fertilizer Cost
a. DAP Cost
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 Swabi 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952
2 Mardan 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952
3 Buner 0.531 0.611 0.703 0.808 0.929 1.142
4 Lakki Marwat 0.531 0.611 0.703 0.808 0.929 1.142
5 DIKhan 0.531 0.611 0.703 0.808 0.929 1.142
6 Tank 0.531 0.611 0.703 0.808 0.929 1.142
7 Bannu 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952
8 Karak 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952
9 Haripur 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952
Total Input Cost: 4.339 4.990 5.738 6.599 7.589 9.329
S.No. District D.A.P. Cost (Rs.in million) Total DAP Cost
b. Urea Cost
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 Swabi 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.354
2 Mardan 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.3543 Buner 0.197 0.227 0.261 0.300 0.345 0.424
4 Lakki Marwat 0.197 0.227 0.261 0.300 0.345 0.424
5 DIKhan 0.197 0.227 0.261 0.300 0.345 0.424
6 Tank 0.197 0.227 0.261 0.300 0.345 0.424
7 Bannu 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.354
8 Karak 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.354
9 Haripur 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.354
Total Input Cost: 1.612 1.853 2.131 2.451 2.819 3.465
S.No. District Urea Cost Total Urea Cost
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
14/37
14
iii. Cost of Spray
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 Swabi 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653
2 Mardan 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653
3 Buner 0.364 0.419 0.482 0.554 0.637 0.783
4 Lakki Marwat 0.364 0.419 0.482 0.554 0.637 0.783
5 DIKhan 0.364 0.419 0.482 0.554 0.637 0.783
6 Tank 0.364 0.419 0.482 0.554 0.637 0.783
7 Bannu 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653
8 Karak 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653
9 Haripur 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653
Total Input Cost: 2.975 3.422 3.935 4.525 5.204 6.397
S.No. District Spray Cost (Rs. In Million) Total Spray
Cost
C. Total Input Cost
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
1 Swabi 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045
2 Mardan 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045
3 Buner 1.142 1.313 1.510 1.736 1.997 2.454
4 Lakki Marwat 1.142 1.313 1.510 1.736 1.997 2.454
5 DIKhan 1.142 1.313 1.510 1.736 1.997 2.454
6 Tank 1.142 1.313 1.510 1.736 1.997 2.454
7 Bannu 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045
8 Karak 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045
9 Haripur 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045
Total Input Cost: 9.323 10.721 12.329 14.178 16.305 20.043
S.No. District Total Inputs Cost (Rs.in Million) Total Input Cost
9. Demand and supply analysis (forIndustrial and Agricultural
Production Projects).
Description of product /services.
The farming community i.e. target group of the
project will be provided with inputs like seed,
fertilizers and pesticides for laying out of
demonstration plots in to their fields. They should
abide by the instructions /directivescommunicated to them by the Agriculture Field
Staff from time to time. The Agriculture staff
namely District Director Agriculture of the
concerned district will visit the field/plot from
time to time. The plots would be laid out under
the instructions and direct supervision of
concerned Agriculture Officer who would be
assisted by his Agriculture Inspector and Field
Assistant. The Agriculture Inspector or Field
Assistant of concerned circle would frequently
pay visit to the demonstration plot and would be
intact with farmers from sowing to harvest.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
15/37
15
Demand/Supply along withunit price for the last five
years.
Pakistans vegetable oil imports are forecast at arecord 2.16 million metric tons (MMT) in Marketing
Year (MY) 2011/12, five percent higher than theestimated 2.05 MMT imported in the 2010/11.
Nearly 75 percent of Pakistans domestic
consumption of vegetable oil is met through imports,
81 percent of which is comprised of palm oil. MY2011/12 imports of soybean meal are projected at a
record 400,000 tons, largely sourced from India.Production of oilseeds in 2011/12 is forecast at a
record 5.8 MMT, up 24 percent from the estimated
4.7 MMT harvested in 2010/11. Pakistans
sunflower area in MY 2010/11 increased by over 65
percent over the previous year and production is
estimated at 660,000 tons. Imports of oilseeds are
forecast at a record 1.3 MMT (92 percent rape seed
and 8 percent sunflower seed).
As far as requirements of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are
concerned, presently the population of the province
is estimated as 25697000 during 2011 (Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa Development Statistics 2010); per
capita consumption of edible oil is 28 Kg/Lit per
one/annum; thus total requirements of edible oilscomes to 719516 metric tons. Per Liter Unit
price/consumer price is Rs. 190.00 at present.
In 2008 per unit cost was Rs. 136/Lit.
Production, Supply and Demand Data Statistics:TotalOilseed
2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012Pakistan
MarketYearBegin:Oct MarketYearBegin:Oct MarketYearBegin:Oct
2009 2010 2011
USDAOfficial NewPost USDAOfficial NewPost USDAOfficial NewPost
AreaPlanted
AreaHarvested 3,722 3,432 3,622 3,332 0 4,092
BeginningStocks 67 28 285 40 0 30
Production 5,097 5,097 4,789 4,682 0 5,792
MYImports 1,078 1,005 910 1,180 0 1,300
MYImp.fromU.S. 2 0 2 0 0 0
MYImp.fromEU 18 0 15 0 0 0
TotalSupply 6,242 5,822 6,012 5,902 0 7,122
MYExports 0 0 0 0 0 0
MYExp.toEU 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crush 5,227 5,070 5,230 5,120 0 6,130FoodUseDom.Cons. 0 2 0 2 0 2
FeedWasteDom.Cons. 730 710 628 750 0 940
TotalDom.Cons. 5,957 5,782 5,858 5,872 0 7,072
EndingStocks 285 40 154 30 0 50
TotalDistribution 6,242 5,822 6,012 5,902 0 7,122
CYImports 980 0 810 0 0 00
CYImp.fromU.S. 2 0 2 0 0 0
CYExports 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYExp.toU.S. 0 2 0 0 0 0
TS=TD 0 0 0 0 0 0
Source: Pakistan Oil Seeds and Products 2011.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
16/37
16
Imports/Exports for the last fiveyears along with unit price (if
applicable).
Pakistan is among one of the worlds largest
importers of vegetable oil. In Market Year
2011/12, palm oil imports are forecast at a
record 2.1 MMT, up 5 percent from last
years estimate of 2.0 MMT. Refined palm
oil accounts for about 81 percent ofPakistans total edible oil imports. The
United States exports only limited quantities
of soybean oil to Pakistan in the form of
food aid.
Project demand/supply for 10 years.
Settled FATA Toal
1998 17736 3176 20912 585545
2008 23640 4400 28040 785123
2009 24307 4494 28801 806439
2010 24993 4591 29584 828344
2011 25679 4689 30368 850307
2012 26384 4790 31173 872856
2013 27108 4892 32000 896007
2014 27852 4997 32849 919776
2015 28617 5104 33721 9441802016 29402 5214 34616 969235
2017 30209 5325 35534 994960
2018 31038 5439 36478 1021373
2019 31890 5556 37446 1048491
2020 32765 5675 38440 1076333
2021 33665 5797 39461 1104920
YearPopulation '000" Per Capita Consumption
of edible oil (in kgs)Requirements(in M.Tonnes)
28
As already mentioned the local produce (on country level) fulfills
only 25% of the total requirements, while rest is recouped through
import of edible oils. The project is aimed at to motivate the farmingcommunity to adopt the crop and include it in their cropping pattern.
It would help to bring a gradual increase in the area under crop by
5~10% per annum.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
17/37
17
Proposed year-wise production and unit price of the product.From the project following production is estimated to be
derived to the farmers through laying out of demonstration
plots in their field.
1st year 2nd year Total
Swabi 43.01 56.00 99.01
Mardan 43.01 56.00 99.01
Buner 40.48 67.20 107.68
Lakki Marwat 43.01 67.20 110.21
DIKhan 45.54 67.20 112.74
Tank 43.01 67.20 110.21
Bannu 45.54 56.00 101.54Karak 45.54 56.00 101.54
Haripur 45.54 56.00 101.54
Total : 394.68 548.80 943.48
District Expected Produce (@ 506 kgs/acres.) in M.Tonnes
Existing and proposed arrangements for marketing.The produce of these demonstration plots to be laid out in
the farmers field will be disposed off in consultation with
Department of Agriculture Extension. The Extension staff
will help the farmer in marketing of the produce.
10.Financial PlanSource of Financing: Provincial ADP 2011-12.
(a)Equity: Sponsors own resources -- Federal government Provincial government DFIs/banks General Public Foreign Equity (indicate
partner Agency.
NGOs/Beneficiaries Others
--
Rs.20.000 Million (ADP 2011-12)--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
18/37
18
(b)DebtIndicate the local & foreign debt,
interest rate, and grace period andrepayment period for each loan
separately. The loan repayment
schedule be also annexed.
Not applicable.
(c)Grants along with source. Provincial ADP(d)Weighted cost of capital --
11.Benefits of the project and analysis.Financial:
Income to the project along with
assumptions:
1st year 2nd year Total
Swabi 6.88 7.57 14.45
Mardan 6.88 7.57 14.45Buner 6.48 7.12 13.60
Lakki Marwat 6.88 7.57 14.45
DIKhan 7.29 8.02 15.30
Tank 6.88 7.57 14.45
Bannu 7.29 8.02 15.30
Karak 7.29 8.02 15.30
Haripur 7.29 8.02 15.30
Total : 63.15 69.46 132.61
District Expected Income from the Produce (@ Rs. 160000/- p.tonne)
(10% increase over the last year)
Economic:Benefit to the economy along with
assumption.
Through the help of this project socio economic condition of hard
living farming community will be changed. With better yield from
improved canola crop, he will fetch better income with lesser
investment. From the above mentioned targeted area, the farmer will
fetch 943.48 tons canola. If 40% of this produce is used for further
plantation i.e. 377.39 metric tonnes, it will cover 188696 acres under
the crop and with 10% annual increase in area it would touch 207564
acres. Following table is an assumption of the area to be broughtfrom40% of the above produce.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
19/37
19
1st year 2nd year Total
Swabi 8602 11200 19802
Mardan 8602 1120019802
Buner 8096 13440 21536
Lakki Marwat 8602 13440 22042
DIKhan 9108 13440 22548
Tank 8602 13440 22042
Bannu 9108 11200 20308
Karak 9108 11200 20308
Haripur 9108 11200 20308
Total = 78936 109760 188696
District Area to be brought from the 40% of the Expected
Produce (in acres)
Social:Benefits with indicators: Through better income farming communitywill have a pleasant social change as in
enhanced purchasing power, stepping
forward to prosperity the socio economic
level would be enhanced.
Result Based Monitoring (RBM)
Indicators:
Indicate Result Based Monitoring(RBM) framework indicators in
quantifiable terms in the
following table.
Baseline Indicator Targets after
Completion of Project
Layingout of Oilseed plots Production in
M.Tonnes
The target/
achievement during
the 1st year of the
project is Base line
(in Acres)
Area to be brought
from the 40% of the
Expected Produce (in
hectares)
The produce from the
area to be brought
from 40% of the
expected produce (in
matric tonnes) @ 506
Kgs/acre
1 Swabi = 185 Acres 24753 85 11200 5667
2 Mardan= 185 Acres 24753 85 11200 5667
3 Buner= 200 Acres 26920 80 13440 6801
4 Lakki Marwat =205 Acres 27553 85 13440 6801
5 DIKhan =210 Acres 28185 90 13440 6801
6 Tank= 205 Acres 27553 85 13440 6801
7 Bannu= 190 Acres 25385 90 11200 5667
8 Karak = 190 Acres 25385 90 11200 5667
9 Haripur = 190 Acres 25385 90 11200 5667
Total : 1760 Acres Or 712.2 ha. 235870 780 109760 55539
S.No Input Output Outcome Targeted Impact
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
20/37
Page 20 of 37
SWOT Analysis and Implicative Strategies
StrengthsDiverse agro-ecological situations
The diverse agro-ecological situations prevalent in the nine project districts favourscultivation canola oilseed crops. Oilseeds are being cultivated in all the agro-ecoregions of the
province. Sub-humid and arid ecosystems also contribute substantial area and production of
oilseeds.
Strong research for development of oilseed technology exist as work of the Oil Seed Development
Board in a number of oil seed crops leads to development of the sector.
Strong frontline extension network for oilseed technology dissemination
The extension network for transfer of oilseed technologies that are developed by oilseeds
development board and Agriculture Research Systems would be disseminated through ExtensionWorkers.
Technology Mission on Oilseeds and impact
Public /Private sector can play a predominant role in increasing the production of oilseeds.
The project impact/results would catch the eye of the private sector for investment.
Continuity of the work of Oil Seed Development Board in Oil Seed Promotion in the Province.
Impact of first line transfer of technology
Production and distribution of quality oilseeds
Seed is a critical and basic input for attaining sustained growth in oilseed production.
Distribution of assured quality seed is necessary for attaining higher yields. Project will also
provide technical assistance for establishment and maintenance of seed banks private level. The
Department of Agriculture Extension Khyber Pakhtunkhwa will be involved in production and
distribution of assured quality seeds for the benefit of oilseed growers.
Human resource development: Through laying out of demonstration plots and technical training /
guidelines to be extended by the Extension Staff will help in human resource development.
Initiatives from oil industry.
Result assumed from the project activities will also get attention of the Oil Industry and hoped
that initiatives would be taken by the oil industry for further extension of the scope of oil seed
production in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
21/37
21
Weaknesses
Production situation
The country produce of oil seed only have a place of 25% of the total requirements.
The development process is a long and lethargic. Limited resources do not allowinvesting billion of rupees on development for getting higher production with
increased area under the crop.
System constraints in public sector transfer of oilseed technology
Though, the larger portion of transfer of technology responsibility lies with the public
sector, there are many lacunae that hamper the transfer of technology efforts by this sector:
1. Multiplicities of technology transfer by each line department and there is littlecoordination across different departments involved.
2. Narrow focus of the agricultural extension system i.e. limited activities have beenundertaken to develop and transfer sustainable technologies to the farmers.
3. Lack of an effective feedback system lead to the extension system that did not focus on thefelt needs of the farmers. Individual farmers or farmers forum did not have effective
linkage with the research and extension system.
4. Little attention was given by the government in developing a cadre of well-qualifiedsubject matter specialists (SMS) with both technical competence and professional skills to
disseminate the improved oilseed technologies to the field level staff as well as the oilseed
growers.
5. The poor research-extension linkage and lack of integration across crop limit technologytransfer from incorporating high value commodities and diversification of the livelihood
activities of the farm into farming systems.
6. Most of the technical staff within the line departments lack the capacity to effectivelycommunicate with both research system and the stakeholder groups. The flow of
information from research to extension tends to be top-down rather interactive. There is
little use of up-to-date communication technologies viz, mass media, print media and
electronic communication between research-extension-stakeholder systems.
Processing situation
Pakistani processing industry suffers from several maladies like outdated technology,lower rates of utilization of installed capacity, low oil recoveries and high unit costs.
Reservation of oilseeds output for small scale processing is depriving the farmers and
consumers of the benefits of lower costs of modern processing technology, while putting up
the costs for consumers. The cost of vegetable oil processing in the country is very high as
compared to the countries like China and USA mainly due to smaller capacities, low
technical efficiency and low capacity utilization. Additional inefficiency arises from non-
integration of solvent extraction units with expeller units; As a result, significant amounts of
expeller cake are not solvent extracted resulting in considerable losses of oil and meal
products.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
22/37
22
Opportunities
Production situation
Biotechnology offers an impressive option to supplement the ongoing efforts on
developing genetically enhanced germplasm of oilseeds for achieving sustainable foodproduction.
Processing situation
There are uncommon opportunities to add value to different oilseeds and oils, which
must be fully exploited, which will eventually enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of
these crops.
ThreatsProduction situation
One factor that has contributed to insufficient domestic supply of oilseeds is the
province development strategy that has often favoured production of crops that compete with
oilseeds for area. The community is attracted to grow other cash crops like sugarcane, wheat etc
and the oil seed crops get little attention of the grower.
Processing situation
The technical inefficiencies in oilseed production, leads to threatening processing
situation. Under utilization of resources reflects a poor-resource base of the farmers and have
implications for optimum utilization of inputs and production of outputs, both onfarm and in
processing unit to reduce allocative and scale inefficiencies. Lack of assured market for oilseeds
and timely and assured supply of quality seeds and raw material for processing have been found
as important factors contributing to the poor performance of the oilseed industry. The standards
set by the oil import countries after liberalization were very high, at times giving impression that
they were used as trade barriers. But all said and done, exporting countries especially the
developing and under developed countries were caught in the web of stringent quality parameters.
Edible oil demand is higher than the supply which created adverse economical situation.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
23/37
23
Implicative strategies
Production situation
The public sector has to strengthen its network for developing improved varieties/
hybrids of oilseeds and must encourage the private sector for production of hybrids and
dissemination of technologies.
Diversification in existing cropping systems such as rice-rice, rice-wheat and
sugarcane in favour of oilseeds is the current need of the country. Providing a policy back up to
support diversification in favour of oilseeds through effective input and price support system is
very important to increase area under oilseeds.
Generation of success stories by working for a minimum of 3 years with the same set of
farmers, instead of working with different groups every year. This will help in concluding
situation and farming system-specific results in a given agro-ecological situation.
Identification and analysis of success stories created by other sources of innovation. Exposure visit to the successful farms created by the other sources to study the similarities
and the differences.
Exposure visit for the interested oilseed growers to the success story sources. Replication of success stories by utilizing the successful farmers as the trainers or resource
persons and the successful farms as the classrooms.
Use of revolving fund for promoting the self-help groups in disseminating improvedtechnological packages instead of distributing subsidies. The community may be
motivated and trained in oilseed-based farming systems and other related enterprises rather
than merely technological packages.
Use of mass media viz, video programmes, print media, radio or television forpopularizing the success stories, instead of utilizing the media for popularizing thetechnological packages.
Reorienting the extension/ transfer of technology system as a system that provides market-producer linkage instead of using it as an agency for distributing input subsidy. It needs a
major shift in the outlook of the extension officials of the development departments
through constant and intensive human resource development planning and
implementation.
To strengthen oil seed marketing system following recommendation may be approved:
Better enforcement of regulated markets Strengthening the appropriate market institutions Promotion of market integration Price incentives for edible oil shortage Better management of edible oil price fluctuation risk during storage Improving quality of information and efficiency of its dissemination Rewarding better quality produce Strengthening regulations regarding quality Enhancing earning from oilcakes and oil meals
Fig 1. Conceptual summary on SWOT analysis of oilseed sector and implicative strategies
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
24/37
24
Strengths
Diverse agro-ecological situations.
Strong research network.
Strong first-line extension system.
Strong public sector network for seed
production.
Strong HRD facilities.
Initiatives from oil industry.
WeaknessesDependence on vagaries of monsoon.
Lack of adequate seed multiplication.
Lower seed replacement ratio.
Vulnerability to pests and diseases.
Gap in resistance breeding.
Resource poor farmers.
Weak infrastructure.
Technical inefficiency of oil industry.
Weak transfer of technology.
Lack of regulatory and trade policy support.Opportunities
Biotechnological options for genetically
enhanced germplasm.Huge exploitable yield reservoir.
Exploiting niche areas of oilseeds cultivation.
Value addition to oilseeds, oils and by-
products.
Scope for improving efficiency of oilseed
processing.
Exploiting supplementary sources of oil.
Extension of retail boom to oilseeds.
Threats
Present Agri-policy support for competing
crops.
Continuous cropping.
Aberrant weather.
Alarming demand for edible oil.
Lack of linkage to assured market.
High standards in the liberalized
Implicative strategies
Public private partnership in varietal development.
Developing self-reliant seed supply mechanism.
Efficient input and policy support for oilseeds.
Delineation and development efficient oilseed production zones.
Developing and promoting of situation specific IPM and INM packages.
Exploitation of niche areas for oilseed expansion.
Value addition to oilseeds, oils and by-products.
Gap-specific extension strategies.
Providing effective market linkage.
Favourable olic framework for oilseeds.
KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA OIL SEED SECTOR
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
25/37
25
Environmental:Environmental impact
assessment negative/positive.
The greenery has positive environmental
impact and its absorption power of
poisonous matters brings pleasant
environmental change. The flower attracts
honey bee and they use its nectar for honey
preparation in their hives.
Financial/Economic Analysis(with
assumptions)
Financial analysis
Quantifiable output of the project. As already mentioned above the quantifiableoutput in terms of income to be derived to the
beneficiaries will be 132.61 million during the
project life.
Profit and loss account and cashflow statement
The project is developing one and not on thebasis of profit or loss as is presumed in any
commercial launch. Any how with the help of
this investment i.e. Rs. 20.000 million, the
farmer will fetch 132.61 2 million rupees. It
will also cut the import bill of the government
as is spent on edible oil.
Net present value (NPV) andbenefit cost ratio (BCR)
Under this project, the farming community
will be given in puts for laying out of
demonstration plots. The size of plot will be
from acre to one acre. So the number of
beneficiaries will be 1079 & 1404 (per
annum) as per following schedule:
Nos. of
Plots
Size of
Plot
(in Kanals)
Total area
to be
brought (in
Acres)
Nos. of
Plots
Sizeof
Plots
(in Kanals)
Total area
to be
brought (in
Acres)
300 8 300 320 8 320
250 6 188 250 6 188
255 5 159 445 5 278
266 4 133 389 4 1951071 780 1404 980
2011-2 2012-13
Total number of beneficiaries will be 2475
with an area of 1760 acres. The cost per unit
(i.e. one acre) comes to Rs. 11363.63 or Rs.
2223.00 on 1000 population of project
districts (Estimated population of project
districts is 89,97,000).
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
26/37
25
Internal financial rate of return(IFRR).
The project is developmental one.
Agriculture Sector is an economic sector
and the government launches its
development project to give boost to
economic growth. Government will not
have any internal financial rate of return yetthe beneficiaries i.e. farming community
will earn better from their fields through the
help of these educational activities to be
demonstrated in their fields for adoption of
better technology in qualitative as well as
quantitative terms.
Unit cost analysis. Rs. 11363.63 per acre (Cost of inputs +other operational costs = Rs. 10520 +
843.63).
Break even point (BEP). Not applicable. Pay back period. The project will pay back to the beneficiary
on harvest. Total crop period is about 4
months.
Return on equity (ROE). The project is a profitable business and noliability rest either on service provider i.e.
government or on beneficiary. All the
expenses would be borne by the
government and services like labour,
watering, care, harvest etc is sole
responsibility of the farmers/borrowers. The
Department will extend its expertise in
shape of technical instructions and
concerned Agriculture Officer(s), Field
Assistant(s) would pay frequent visit to
make the highest yield/produce success.
Economic Analysis
Provide taxes and duties separately inthe capital and operating cost.
From a report published by Global
Agriculture Information Network (GAIN)
namely Pakistan Oilseeds and products
Annual 2011, that the government have
levied 16% Central Excise Duty and 3%
Income Tax.
The project inputs would pay usual taxes
levied by the government yet the produce
and its by products would share in to
national income through GST etc levied bythe government.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
27/37
26
Net present value (NPV) and benefitCost Ratio (BCR).
Net present value of the project is Rs. 20.000
million as total investment which have inputs
expenses , operational cost i.e. T.A and POL
for the touring officers/officials. The services
viz Agriculture Experts visits and advices to
be conveyed to the farmer, services to berendered by the benefacary are not calculated
on the basis of commercial factor. The
government efforts to motivate the farming
community and to bring change in demand
and supply imbalances are worthwhile in the
long run as is discussed earlier.
Internal economic rate of return (IERR). From the area to be brought by the farmingcommunity under canola crop following
produce is estimated. This produce have a
potential to bring the change and rationalizedemand and supply. Canola is rich in oil
contents and have 40% of the oil at an
average. The project will cover 2341 acres of
land under the crop which would yield
1184.55 metric tonnes. 40% of this produce if
procured as seed it will cover an area of
about 473881 acres which on further
dissemination will yield as fetch 299691
liters of canola oil. This quantity will fulfil
the requirements of which will feed more
than 10703 persons (@ 28 kg/head per
annum).
S.No. Particulars Unit Qty
1 Area To be covered under the project Acres 2,341.00
2 Estimated Produce @ 506 kgs/acre M.Tonns 1,184.55
3 40% of produce (i.e. 473.82 tonnes) to
be used as seed will cover an area
under crop (Seed Rate @ 2 kgs/acre)
Acres 236,909.00
4 Estimated Produce of persumed area
under crop
M.Tonns 119,875.95
5 Estimated Edible oil quantity to be
obtained from 40% of the produce (Sr.
No. 4)
M.Tonns 19,180.15
6 Per Capita Consumption kg/one/annum 28.00
7 Edible Oil to be available for human
consumption
persons 685,005.45
Foreign Exchange rate of the project(Brunos Ratio) for import substitute
and export oriented projects.
Not applicable
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
28/37
27
Employment analysis:
Employment generation (directand indirect).
Though there is no direct employment under
the project itself as existing staff will render
the duties in addition to their own/mandatory
duties, yet through change in agriculture andbringing the new area under cultivation the
community should have engage casual
labour/farm labour at the ratio of 4 persons
per 100 acres so 2369 persons would get
jobs if engaged as farm labour for the total
presumed area i.e. 236909 acres.
Sensitivity analysis:
Impact of delays o project costand viability.
The funds must be released soon after start of
fiscal in full and not in the piece meal. Delayin releases would adversely affect the project
and will make the achievement difficult even
impossible.
12.a) Implementation Schedule: Indicate starting and completion
date of the project.
October 2011 to June 2016.
Item-wise/year wiseimplementation schedule in line
chart co-related with the phasing
of physical activities.
Swabi Mardan BunerLakki
MarwatDIKhan Tank Bannu Karak Haripur
2011-12 90 90 85 90 90 90 90 90 90
2012-13 100 100 120 120 120 120 100 100 100
90 90 85 90 90 90 90 90 90
100 100
120 120 120 120
100 100 100
Demonstration Plots to Be Laid Out (Area in Acres)
2011-12 2012-13
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
29/37
28
13. Maintenance structure andmanpower requirements:
Administrative arrangements forimplementation of project.
The Director General Agriculture
(Extension) will administer all project
activities through the assistance of Dy.Director P&D & his staff at Directorate
General Agriculture (Extension) Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa.
The manpower requirements byskills/profession during
execution and operation of the
project.
The required man power by skill is
available with the department i.e. District
Officer(s) Agriculture, Agriculture Officers,
Field Assistants of the concerned / project
district(s).
The job description,qualification, experience, age
and salary of each job may be
provided.
1. DISTRICT DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE:DDA acts as over all in charge of
Agriculture (Extension) Activities in his
district. He acts as executive/
operational body. Implements plans,
policy of the government regarding
agriculture. He bridges farming
community and Agricultural Scientists
and recommendations of the agricultural
scientists are disseminated through a
number of direct/indirect methods. He
uses extension tools for getting highest
economical yield of the crops. He
maintains cropping pattern in his
respective district. He acts as facilitator
to the farming community.
2. AGRICULTURE OFFICER:An agriculture graduate, team leader of
the Extension Work Force, who is
responsible for implementation of the
work plan (Kharif & Rabi Action plan
chalked out by the government of
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
30/37
29
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Agriculture
(Extension Department). Executes
Developmental activities of ADP/ Non
ADP Schemes launches by the Federal/
Provincial and District Governments.
3. AGRICULTURE INSPECTOR/FIELDASSISTANT:
These are important /direct links of
Extension works with the farming
community. These are Diploma holders
in Agriculture. They make the dreams
of the farming community true through
assistance / guide lines extended to the
grower from time to time. These are
front line workers and are posted at
union council level.
14.Additional projects/decisionrequired:
It is necessary to make the marketing of the
produce easy, convenient and hassle free.
The produce should further be disposed off
through oil extraction. It is recommended
that a separate project may be initiated for
establishment of oil extraction units in the
project districts so the farming community
may easily dispose its produce off in their
own districts. For the purpose governmentshould have contacted to the investors
keeping in view the produce and span of
project activities, adoption of crop
incorporating it in the cropping pattern of
farming community on a larger scale as the
production would be sufficient for
commercial usage.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
31/37
30
15.Certificate The name, designation and phone # of the
officer responsible for preparing and
checking be provided. It may also be
confirmed that PC-I has been prepared as
per instructions issued by the PlanningCommission for the preparation of PC-I for
Production Sector projects.
The PC-I along with certificate must be signed by
the Principal Accounting Officer to ensure its
ownership.
It is certified that the project proposal has been prepared
on the basis of Instructions provided by the Planning
Commission for the preparation of PC-1 for production
sector project.
Prepared: (Farhat Abbas Durrani)
Development Assistant DGA(E)
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar
(03339333459)
Checked by: (Dr. Fayaz-ud-Din Qazi)
Dy. Director Planning & Monitoring
DGA (E) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar
(03339139029)
(Muhammad Taslim)
Director General Agric.Extn.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar.(0314 947 4490)
Approved by: (Muhammad Afsar Khan)
Secretary to the Govt. Of Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa, Agric. Livestoci & Coop.
Deptt. Peshawar.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
32/37
31
MAP OF THE KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
Project District
Project District
Project District
Project District
Project District
Project District
Project District
Project District
Project District
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
33/37
32
PE&DDSCHEME MONITOR AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
P.C.1 S.K.I.M.
(Scheme Key Indicator Matrix)
a. Identification of Scheme PE&DD/M&E PC-1Page 1/3
Code + Title :
District:
579-110121-Enhancement of Edible Oil
through Sowing of Canola in Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa.
Checked by:
Swabi, Mardan, Bunir, Lakki, DIKhan,
Tank, Bannu, Karak and Haripur.Sector: Agriculture Name Mohammad Taslim
Sub Sector Agriculture Extension Position Director General,Agriculture Extension,KPKCategory Agriculture Mechanization
Tick as appropriate: Approved by:
Civil
WorkMisc:
On Farm Water Management Name (Muhammad Afsar Khan)
Agriculture Extension Position Secretary to Govt. Of KPK
Agriculture Research Agriculture Deptt. KPK
Planning & Development Please encircle correct answer:
Live stock & Dairy Dev:
Veterinary Research Foreign Aided Project: No
Fruit & Veg: Dev. Board Name of donor/Foreign
Grant/foreign loan
N.A
Cooperative
Composite Scheme. NoIf yes, number of
individual components
NA
Implementation Dates for this PC-1
Project starting date Sep 2011Expected completion date 30th Jun, 2013Proposed Duration in month 22 MonthsNo. Of Financial Years involved 2 years
PC-1 Prepared by:
Name Farhat Abbas Durrani
PositionDev. Assistant
Directorate General Agri. (E)
Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Peshawar.Date
SignatureSponsoring Agency/Line Dept. Executing Agency
1b. Revision Status 1c. General Remarks
Revised PC-1 or data? Yes / No For Ongoing Schemes:
If Yes Forum approval date.
Number of Revisions so far. Admn: approval date.
Date Original PC1 Sanctioned Technical Sanction Date
Date of 1st Start of Project Technical Sanction Cost.
Total Project duration from start.
Total Number of Financial Years TakenIf the scheme is revised then indicate the starting date of the revision, completion date as per revision, and the No. of additional months and financial years to be taken.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
34/37
33
Project: Enhancement of Edible Oil through Sowing of Canola in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.Sector Agriculture Sub Sector: Agriculture ExtensionCategory Miscellaneous
3 Physcal Targetss
Sr. No. Key indicator 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Total 1st 2nd 3rd
Laying out of
Canola D/PlotsAcres 1760 100% 780 1,760 - - - 1,760 980 1,960 2,940
i. Swabi Acres 185 11% 85 185 - - - 185 100 200 300
ii. Mardan Acres 185 100% 85 185 - - - 185 100 200 300
iii. Buner Acres 200 100% 80 200 - - - 200 120 240 360
iv. Lakki Acres 205 93% 85 205 - - - 205 120 240 360
v. DIKhan Acres 210 90% 90 210 - - - 210 120 240 360
vi. Tank Acres 205 88% 85 205 - - - 205 120 240 360
vii. Bannu Acres 190 90% 90 190 - - - 190 100 200 300
viii. Karak Acres 190 97% 90 190 - - - 190 100 200 300
ix. Haripur Acres 190 97% 90 190 - - - 190 100 200 300
1
Ex-post cumulative target for
three years after copletion
Unit of
measure-
ment
Overall
scheme
targets
Overall
Indic. Of
Scheme/
weight
Cumulative target by financial year
Signatures of approving body
Note:Fill in the blanks in table. Figures in the last quarter/year should always coincide with figures in overall scheme target column.
Weights are in percentages and should always add up to 100% They are usually pre-set but can be modified if there is a need.
The weights should always reflect the relative importance of the indicator/activity/output in the total of the scheme.
The PC-1 SKIM has to be signed and annexed to the PC1 and to the Administrative Approval forum.
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
35/37
34
Important Notes:
1. All costs are in Million of Pakistan Rupees. The cost breakdown should not be cumulative.Add more columns if necessary.
2. Target setting is to be done always by financial year. This means that a scheme of 10 monthsduration can still take 2 financial years to complete for instance if it is starts in April.
PE&DD/M&E PC-1
Page 3/3 empty.wk3
Local
in Rs. (M)
F.E.C.
In Rs. (M)
Local
in Rs. (M)
F.E.C.
In Rs. (M)
Local
in Rs. (M)
F.E.C.
In Rs. (M)
i.Capital - - - - - -
ii. Revenue 9.000 - 11.000 - 20.000 -
iii. Total 9.000 - 11.000 - 20.000 -
TotalSummary
Estimated Cost
Financial Year 1st Financial Year 2nd
Note:
Capital (Code) refers to the works accounts: revenue (8) to all other accounts.
(*) currency used: Pak: Rupees Exchanged Used: N.A.
Signature
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
36/37
35
Check List For Appraisal of PC-1
(To be attached to PC-1 Form)
1. Preliminary Checks.
S/No: Points Line Deptt. ADSC/DSC/PDWP
1 Is the Scheme in the ADP? Yes/No Yes/No
2 Is the project justified for funding
(according to policy guidelines)?
Yes/No Yes/No
3 Is it also funded by the FederalGovernment?
Yes/No Yes/No
4Is there another scheme of the same
nature in this locality/area?
Yes/No Yes/No
5
If so, has adequate justification for
implementing the scheme been givenin the PC-1 form?
Yes/No/N.A Yes/No/N.A
6 Has a feasibility study been conducted?
If yes, summarise findings in working paper.
Yes/No Yes/No/N.A
7Has the feasibility study looked at the
consequences of the project for women;
advantages/disadvantages?
Yes/No/N.A Yes/No/N.A
8 Has the PC-1 Form has been prepared
according to the proper format?
Yes/No/N.A Yes/No/N.A
9 Have the gander-specific guidelines
satisfactorily been used?
Yes/No/N.A Yes/No/N.A
10 Is the PC-1 form complete in every respect? Yes/No Yes/No
11 Are plans and drawings for the projectincluded?
Yes/No Yes/No
12 Building (housing/offices) projects; do they
include facilities for women?
Yes/No/N.A Yes/No/N.A
13 Is land available? Yes/No/NA Yes/No
14Has it been mentioned in the PC-1 Form
whether the site selected is convenientfor women/children?
Yes/No/NA Yes/No
Comments by Line Department,
if any.
Comments by ADSC/DSC/PDWP, if any
Assessment of PC-1
Comments by the ADSC/DSC/PDWP
Good, needs further
clarification, unacceptable
-
8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final
37/37
2. Overall and General checks:
1 Does the PC-1 Form clearly explain thespecific problems to be addressed?
Yes/No
2 Has the target-group been involved inthe identification of the problems?
Yes/No
3If women are a part of the target-group
have they been involved in the
identification of problems?
Yes/No
4Is it explained how the scheme will help
in solving these problems?
Yes/No
5 Have special measures been proposed to
solve the problems of Women?
Yes/No/N.A
6 Have objectives been formulated in preciseand correct terms?
Yes/No
7 Are objectives of the scheme related to
the overall objectives of the sector?
Yes/No
8
Are the objectives of the scheme related
to the WID-objectives of the sector, the
Five Year Plan and / or other relevant
policy papers?
Yes/No/N.A
9Has the target-group been well defined?
(Women/men/boy/girls/landless/small
farmers etc.)
Yes/No
10
Have the effects and impact (long term
changes): Benefits/disadvantages of the schemeon the development of women been
indicated? If yes, summarise findings in
working paper.
Yes/No
11
If possible negative consequences for
women have been identified, have
special measures been taken toovercome them?
Yes/No
12
Have the effects and impact (long term
changes; Benefit / disadvantages) of the
schemeon the environment been indicated?
If yes, sumarise findings in working paper.
Yes/No
Comments by Line Department, if any.
Comments by ADSC/DSC/PDWP, if any
Assessment of PC-1
Comments by the ADSC/DSC/PDWP
Good, needs further
clarification, unacceptable