PBPD of Steel MRF: DESIGN CASE STUDY · One Week FDP Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and...
Transcript of PBPD of Steel MRF: DESIGN CASE STUDY · One Week FDP Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and...
One Week FDPFundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to
Earthquake Engineeringin Sanjay Ghodawat Group of Institute
PBPD of Steel MRF: DESIGN CASE STUDY
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale
Assistant Professor, Applied MechanicsGovernment College of Engineering and Research, Avasari
December 11, 2015Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Nine-storey Steel Moment Resisting Frame
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
VALIDATION OF DESIGN
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Analytical Validation of Design
Modelling
Using Abaqus as generalpurpose finite elementpackage
Beams and Columns as lineelement (B21)
Elastic-perfectly plasticsteel: Fy = 344.74 MPa
Lumped mass model with5% Rayleigh damping
P-Delta and gravity loadingare not considered
Abaqus Modelling
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Analytical Validation of Design
Analysis
Eigen value analysis to check whether T ≈ Tassumed
Nonlinear static pushover analysis (NSPA) for θy =Dy
H
Nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA) for θp = DmH − θy
Design checking
Achieved ductility ratio µa = DmDy
= 1 +θpθy
Effectiveness of design method:Closeness of the achieved ductility ratio (µa) to the target (µt)
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Analytical Validation of Design: Eigen Value Analysis
Modal frequency and time periods
Mode 1, ω1 = 3.33 rad/s, T1 = 1.88 s (Note T1 = 1.88 s≈Tassumed = 1.80 s)
Mode 2, ω2 = 7.79 rad/s, T2 = 0.81 s
Mode 3, ω3 = 20.98 rad/s, T3 = 0.30 s
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Analytical Validation of Design: NSPA
For calculation of yield drift
Lateral forces as per IS:1893Part I- 2002
Displacement control foranalysis (Monitor nodehighlighted by red)
Pushed upto 4(θy )assumedH
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Analytical Validation of Design: NSPA
Bilinearization pushover plot
Red (solid line):- Actualpushover curve
Black (dash line):-Bilinearized pushover curve
Areas under actual curveand bilinearized curve aresame
Yield base shear,Vby = 5100kN
Yield displacement,Dm = 0.300m
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Analytical Validation of Design: NLRHA
Nonlinear response historyanalysis to find plastic drift
EQ1:- Kobe Earthquake,EQ2:-NorthridgeEarthquake,EQ3:Loma PrietaEarthquake
5% damping in first twomodes
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Analytical Validation of Design: NLRHA
Achieved displacement ductility ratio µaEarthquake Ultimate roof displacement Dm (m) Yield roof displacement Dy Achieved ductility µa
Kobe 1.2 0.3 4.00
Northridge 1.35 0.3 4.50
Loma Prieta 1.4 0.3 4.67
Note:- Achieved ductility is very close to target ductility
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Analytical Validation of Design: NSPA:Yield mechanism
Status of MRF at an instant of maximum roof displacement from
NLRHA under Northridge earthquake. Formation of plastic hinges at the
base of column and at the end of floor beams (Fy = 3.445E + 05 kN/m2)
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
Summary
1 Performance-based plastic design method for steel MRFsystem considering target displacement ductility ratio anda selected yield mechanism is discussed.
2 A case study of a nine-storey MRF for target displacementductility ratio µt = 4 is achieved using PBPD method.
3 PBPD of a nine-storey MRF is analytically tested usingnonlinear static pushover and nonlinear dynamicanalyses.
4 Analytical validation of this design showed that PBPDmethod is very effective in achieving performanceobjectives in terms of target displacement ductility andpre-selected yield mechanism.
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering
References
1 Lee, S.-S. and Goel, S. C. (2001), “Performance-based designof steel moment frames using target drift and yieldmechanism”, Research Report UMCEE 01-07, University ofMichigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
2 Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J. (1982), “Earthquake Spectraand Design”, Earhquake Engineering Research Institute,California, USA.
3 Goel, S. C. and Chao, S.-H. (2009), “Performance-BasedPlastic Design: Earthquake-Resistant Steel Structures”,International Code Council, Washington, USA.
4 Kharmale, S. B.(2011) “Inelastic Displacement-Based SeismicDesign of Steel Plate Shear Wall”, Ph.D Thesis, IndianInstitute of Technology Bombay, India
Dr. Swapnil B. Kharmale Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics and Application to Earthquake Engineering