PAYDAY LENDING IN LONDON - Community-Based …€¦ · · 2014-02-06This project was funded by...
Transcript of PAYDAY LENDING IN LONDON - Community-Based …€¦ · · 2014-02-06This project was funded by...
PAYDAY LENDING IN LO NDON
RESEARCH REPORT
April 2012
Prepared BY:
Commissioned by:
73 King Street West, Suite 300 Kitchener, Ontario N2G 1A7
Phone: (519) 741-1318 Fax: (519) 741-8262 E-mail: [email protected]
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
409 King Street London, Ontario N6B 1S5
Phone: (519) 438-1723 Fax: (519) 438-9938 www.uwlondon.on.ca
Payday lending Practices in London 2
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
United Way Staff and Volunteers
Research Team
Yasir Dildar, Team Leader Liliana Araujo, Team Member Sarah Marsh, Team Member
Research Lead Organization
Centre for Community Based Research (CCBR) 73 King Street West, Suite 300 Kitchener, Ontario N2G 1A7
Acknowledgements
The following students/volunteers helped in different tasks to complete this research study. Ayesha umme-jihad Elvis Lee Sara Naz
This project was funded by the United Way London-Middlesex. The views and opinions
expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect those of the United Way.
Payday lending Practices in London 3
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 4
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6
1.1 Payday lending......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Payday lending in Canada and Ontario ..................................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Overview of the study .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Research purpose and quesions .................................................................................................................................. 7
1.2.2 Research methods ............................................................................................................................................................. 8
1.2.3 Data analysis ................................................................................................................................................................... 13
2. Payday lending practices ............................................................................................. 14
2.1 Payday lenders in London ................................................................................................................. 14 2.1.1 Perception about payday loan and payday lenders .............................................................................................. 14
2.1.2 Relationship of payday lenders with other financial institutions ....................................................................... 15
2.1.3 Profits of payday lenders in London .......................................................................................................................... 16
2.2 Payday loan borrowers in London .................................................................................................. 16 2.2.1 Borrowers’ experience with banking system .......................................................................................................... 17
2.2.2 Source of information and frequency of borrowing payday loans .................................................................... 21
2.2.3 Reasons for borrowing payday loans ........................................................................................................................ 23
2.2.4 Satisfaction with payday lenders ................................................................................................................................ 26
2.2.5 Impact of borrowing payday loans ............................................................................................................................ 30
3. Financial education program ...................................................................................... 35
4.1 Knowledge about existing financial education programs ........................................................... 37
4.2 Need for a financial education program ........................................................................................ 39
4. Suggestions for a financial education program ........................................................ 43
4.1 Preferred settings and delivery mechanisms ................................................................................ 43
4.2 Financial education program promotion ....................................................................................... 45
4.3 Key locations and target population ............................................................................................... 45
4.4 Implementing partners ....................................................................................................................... 46
5. Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 50
Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 51
Payday lending Practices in London 4
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is the research report of payday lending practices in London. This study was commissioned
by the United Way of London and Middlesex and conducted by the Centre for Community Based Research (CCBR).
The purpose of this study was to explore payday lending practices in London with focus on
gathering information in three main areas. First, this study sought information about payday
lenders. Second, this research explored information about payday loan borrowers such as who
they are, why they borrow from payday lenders and how satisfied they are with payday lenders
as well as the impact that borrowing from payday lenders has on their lives. Lastly, this research
study also gathered information on financial education in London.
Multiple methods were used in this study. Main methods included: literature review; borrower
survey (face-to-face n=20; online n=53); an online survey for community agencies (n=39); key
informant interviews (n=5) and case studies which included interviews with borrowers and a
person they identified as knowing about their payday lending use (n=3).
The following are main findings of the study:
Payday lenders
There are many payday lending outlets in London and their number is rising.
Payday lenders are catering to individuals who are in need of money when unexpected
emergencies arise.
Payday lenders provide a convenient and quick access to money.
Generally, payday lenders were perceived as predatory. Those representing the
Canadian Payday Lending Association expressed that the payday lending industry is
regulated and often misperceived.
Payday loan borrowers
Payday loan borrowers in London were described as low income individuals; dependent
on Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP), Ontario Works (OW) or social
assistance; as well as those who have a bad credit history, thus, not having access to a
loan through a bank. Some study participants said that borrowers belong to all income groups and are not
limited to the characteristics mentioned above.
The majority of borrowers who completed the survey had interacted with a bank (i.e.
had some kind of a bank account)
Most often, borrowers heard of payday lenders through family or friends or sign boards.
The most common reasons borrowers gave for making the switch to payday lending
were: having a bad credit history and the lack of small loans from banks. Lack of
awareness of the banking system was also a reason why payday loans are used rather
than banks.
Payday lending Practices in London 5
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Borrowers identified having used multiple services at payday lending stores, including
cheque cashing, pre-paid credit cards and money transfers.
The majority of borrower survey respondents did not rollover on a loan.
The most common reasons for borrowing money from payday lenders were: to meet
basic needs, pay bills and rent.
The majority of borrowers received a contract when they obtained their loan and
reported that the loan was helpful and good for emergencies. However, they did not
like the high interest rates and fees associated with payday loans.
Most reported being charged 20-25% interest over two weeks, while some reported
being charged more. Additional services offered by payday lenders were also seen as
being very expensive.
Mostly negative impacts were identified by borrowers as a result of borrowing from
payday lenders; including: falling into a debt trap; dropping monthly income; and high
amounts of stress.
Financial Education
A vast majority of study participants identified the need for a payday loan alternative.
Providing a loan with a low interest rate and fees and clear information were the most
important elements to consider while developing a payday alternative.
Respondents suggested that there is a need for a community-wide financial education
program in London, believing that it would benefit the community.
Respondents rated integrating financial literacy into other existing programs as the most
effective delivery setting. The least preferred delivery setting was via the internet.
The most preferred delivery mechanism was one-on-one counselling with the least
preferred being via the internet again.
Providing the program close to where people live as well as providing incentives (e.g.
food, childcare, transportation costs, etc.) were identified as the best promotion
strategies.
In terms of location, low income neighbourhoods should be considered, but there is
need across the city and in rural areas as well.
For youth, delivery in schools was suggested and for individuals on ODSP or OW,
information about the program could be included with their cheques.
Suggested organizations and agencies to lead such a program include the municipal
government, OW/ODSP, and community agencies that serve people living in poverty,
including the United Way of London & Middlesex. Other community agencies and
stakeholders such as, banks, credit unions and payday lenders should be involved in
implementing a community-wide financial education program.
Payday lending Practices in London 6
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
1. INTRODUCTION
This report addresses the findings of a research study conducted by the Centre for
Community-Based Research (CCBR) on behalf of United Way of London. The United Way of London aims to try to understand the effects of payday lending on people who use payday loan.
The purpose of this research was to gather information about the nature and location of
existing payday lending services in London; the nature and experiences of payday loan
borrowers in London; education that is available for these borrowers; as well as alternatives
and policy implications within London.
1.1 PAYDAY LENDING
Payday loans are short-term loans provided against a client's evidenced income. Borrowers take
out small loans of up to 50% of their next paycheque during situations in which they require
money before their next paycheque is due. Normally, the borrower has to pay back the loan
within the following two weeks as well as pay any additional fees, charges, and/or interest they
incurred. Besides loan interest, there are numerous other fees that payday lenders can charge
borrowers, including: set-up fees, administration fees, broker’s fees, collection fees, early
repayment fees, loan repayment fees, non-sufficient fund charges, roll-over or loan renewal
fees. Lenders typically require borrowers to provide proof of regular income, a permanent
address, an active bank account, and in some cases, post-dated cheques for the date on which
the loan should be paid in full. Many payday lenders also provide other services such as
telephone card, money transfer, pre-paid credit card, gift card, buy gold and post box services.
1.1.1 PAYDAY LENDING IN CANADA AND ONTARIO
Starting in the 1990s, payday loans became increasingly popular in Canada. Approximately 1,635
stores operate in Canada, with over 750 in Ontario (Ontario Payday Lending Industry, 2009)1.
The average loan amount is $280 borrowed for a period of 10 days (Canadian Payday Loan
Association, 2009) and the total payday loan volume in Canada is widely estimated to be
approximately $2 billion per annum (Ontario Payday Lending Industry, 2009).
Payday lenders in Canada and Ontario operate within a legislative framework. In the spring of
2007, the Canadian government amended the anti-usury section of the Criminal Code of
Canada, section 347, to exempt payday lenders from the maximum 60 % Annual Percentage
Rate and to give provinces and territories the authority to implement regulations independently
1 Established in 2004, the CPLA represents 630 businesses providing payday loans and/or cheque cashing services across Canada. With approximately 1,635 retail stores in Canada, 630 are members of the CPLA. The CPLA’s mandate is to work
with the federal and provincial government with the aim of developing a national regulatory framework that allows industry
viability and consumer protection.
Payday lending Practices in London 7
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
(Ministry of Government Services, 2009). In 2008, Ontario’s Payday Loans Act was passed and
most elements were implemented during 2009 (Ministry of Consumer Services, 2010).
The main elements of this Act are as follows:
Payday lenders and loan brokers are required to be licensed.
Roll-over loans are prohibited.
Payday loan borrowers have a two-day "cooling off" period to cancel a loan with no
reason without incurring a penalty.
An Ontario Payday Lending Education Fund will be established and paid for by licensees.
Maximum total cost for borrowing a payday loan in Ontario is $21 per $100 borrowed.
Proponents of payday lending, such as the Canadian Payday Loan Association, argue that payday
loan stores provide a product for consumers who have a short-term financial crunch, and
without this product many of these consumers would have had no option aside from turning to
underground money lenders. They also establish that banks fail to meet the financial needs of low-income Canadians and the likelihood of a bank refusing to open an account is 1.5 to 2
times higher for people with lower income, education, and age – the target market for payday
lenders. (Buckland et al., 2007)
However, the critics, including the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, term this practice as
exploitative, taking advantage of people's financial hardships. Critics claim that the payday
lending industry depends heavily on repeat business and that low-income borrowers are more
likely to be trapped in a 'debt cycle' because the short pay-back period makes it difficult to
repay the entire amount owing.
1.2 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY
The Centre for Community Based Research (CCBR) was contracted to carry out the payday
lending research study. CCBR is an independent, not-for-profit organization established in
1982 (www.communitybasedresearch.ca). Located in Kitchener, Ontario, CCBR is committed
to social change and the development of communities and human services that are responsive
and supportive, especially for people with limited access to power and opportunity.
1.2.1 RESEARCH PURPOSE AND QUESTIONS
The overall purpose of the research was to look at the existing payday lending practices in
London by gathering information about payday lenders, payday loan borrowers, as well as information about financial education available within the community. The research study used
multiple methods to answer the following main questions:
Information about payday lenders
Where are the payday lenders located in London?
Payday lending Practices in London 8
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
What are the profits of payday lenders in London?
What are the payday lenders’ relationships with other financial institutions (e.g. banks)?
Information about payday loan borrowers
Who are the payday loans borrowers in London?
What are the main reasons that motivate the payday loan borrowers to borrow for the first time?
o Why do the payday loans borrowers continue borrowing from payday lenders?
To what extent are the payday loans borrowers satisfied with payday loans/lenders?
What is the impact of borrowing from payday lenders on payday loan borrowers?
Financial education
What are the existing financial education programs in London?
To what extent are the existing financial education programs meeting the needs of London community?
To what extent is there a need for a community-wide financial education program?
o If there is a need for a community-wide financial education program, what should
be its key components?
1.2.2 RESEARCH METHODS
The project utilized several ways of gathering information involving different stakeholder
perspectives. Use of a series of methods enhances triangulation of research results and
increases the rigour of the findings. Main methods included:
LITERATURE REVIEW
The research team conducted a review of available literature on payday lending in Ontario,
Canada and beyond. The literature review, in particular, helped in developing data collection
tools that were used to gather information from payday loan borrowers, community agencies
and key informants.
PAYDAY LOAN BORROWER SURVEY
A survey of payday loan borrowers was conducted. The quantitative survey (with a few
qualitative questions) consisted of closed, categorical, and scale-based questions. The survey
was conducted to explore the diverse motivations or reasons for using payday loans. Payday
loan borrowers also provided feedback about their level of satisfaction with payday lenders and
impact of using payday loans. Participants for the face-to-face interviews and online survey were
recruited with the help of the United Way of London and Middlesex and its member agencies.
A total of 73 surveys were completed (n=20 face-to-face and n=53 online). The majority of
respondents were in the age range of 31-40 years. More females (61%) than males (39%)
completed the survey. Three-fourths of survey respondents (75%) have completed a secondary
Payday lending Practices in London 9
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
school diploma and/or a diploma or certificate from a college or technical school. Only two
survey respondents reported completing Master’s degrees.
In terms of income sources, more than half of the survey respondents were receiving support
from Ontario Works (OW) or the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP). Less than one-
third (29%) were working full-time and one-tenth of respondents were working part-time.
Sixty-three per cent of survey respondents reported their income to be less than $20,000 per
annum. Only 14% earned more than $40,000 a year.
3%
13%
41%
28%
15%
20 years or younger
21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60
Borrower Survey Distribution of respondents according to their
age (n=68)
39%
61%
Male Female
Borrower Survey Distribution of respondents according to their
gender (n=69)
25 26
7
2
8
Completed diploma from secondary school (high
school)
Completed diploma or certificate from college
or technical school
Completed university undergraduate degree
(e.g. BA)
Completed university graduate or professional
degree (MA)
Other
Borrower Survey Distribution of respondents according to their formal education (n=68)
Payday lending Practices in London 10
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Nearly half (49%) of survey respondents were living alone, 41% with another adult and the
remaining 10% were living with more than 3 adults in the household. Most of the respondents
(63%) were living in a rented house/apartment; 14% in subsidized housing; 7% had no place to
live and only 8% reported owning their house.
27%
29% 29%
10%
4%
1%
Ontario Works ODSP Full-time work Part-time work Unemployed Pension (retired)
Borrower Survey Distribution of respondents according to their source of income (n=69)
26%
37%
10% 13%
10%
4%
0----less than 10,000 10,000----20,000 21,000---30,000 31,000----40,000 41,000----50,000 More than 50,000
Borrower Survey Distribution of respondents according to their income (n=68)
Payday lending Practices in London 11
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWS
Key informant interviews were conducted with representative of community agencies, financial
institutions, and payday lenders. A total of five key informants were identified in consultation
with United Way staff. All of the interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed with the
participants’ permission. The purpose of these in-depth qualitative interviews was to gather
information about payday lending practices, existing financial literacy programs and gaps therein
as well the implications of this research for any future programming. A list of key informants is
provided in the appendix.
49%
41%
5% 5%
1 2 3 4 or more
Borrower Survey Distribution of respondents according to their household size (n=63)
7% 8%
63%
14%
3% 1% 4%
I don't have any place to live
I own a house I live in a rented house/apartment
I live in subsidized housing
I live with a friend Don't know Other
Borrower Survey Distribution of respondents according to type of housing (n=73)
Payday lending Practices in London 12
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
COMMUNITY AGENCY SURVEY
A brief online survey was designed to collect data from community agencies in London. The
purpose of the survey was to gain an understanding of the financial education programs in
London and to outline the future strategies.
A total of 39 community agencies responded to the survey. More than one-third of
respondents (36%) reported that their agency served 1-20 clients who have openly admitted to
using payday loans. Only three respondents noted that their agency had served more than 100
clients who had used payday loans. Most of the survey respondents belonged to agencies
serving women (67%), low income individuals (67%), youth (59%), and individuals living with
disabilities (50%).
14
6
4
0 0
3
0
12
1-20 clients a year 21-40 clients a year
41-60 clients a year
61-80 clients a year
81-100 clients a year
More than 100 clients a year
We have not served any such
client
Unsure
Community Agency Survey How many clients have your served who have openly admitted to using payday loans? (n=39)
Payday lending Practices in London 13
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
CASE STUDY
Three case studies of payday loan borrowers were conducted. Each case study involved an in-depth interview with a payday loan borrower and one other person who was aware of his/her
payday loan borrowing experience.
1.2.3 DATA ANALYSIS
Data analysis was carried out collaboratively by the research team to ensure that study themes
were identified and confirmed by multiple team members. The web survey data was entered
and analyzed using SPSS and MS Excel while the qualitative data from key informant interviews,
case study, and literature review was analyzed using content analysis.
59%
67% 67%
47%
38% 41%
32%
23%
50%
Youth Women Low income individuals
Children Aboriginal Newcomers Seniors LGBTQ Individuals living with disabilities
Community Agency Survey What population group does your agency primarily serve? (n=34)
Payday lending Practices in London 14
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
2. PAYDAY LENDING PRACTICES
This main section of the report provides multiple perspectives of payday lending practices in
London and provides information about payday lenders as well as payday loan borrowers.
2.1 PAYDAY LENDERS IN LONDON
According to the 2011 Census, the population of London, Ontario is around 366,151. There
are many payday loan outlets in London. We have compiled a list of 35 such payday loan outlets
in London and area. See Appendix for list of payday loan outlets and their location in London.
This list by no means is an exhaustive list of all payday lenders as there may be pawnshops and
other outlets that provide similar loans.
2.1.1 PERCEPTION ABOUT PAYDAY LOAN AND PAYDAY LENDERS
All the research participants agreed that payday lenders cater to individuals who need money in
times of emergencies and who cannot or do not access other financial institutions because of
eligibility criteria. Study participants also noted that payday lenders provide fast, friendly and
convenient service to their customers.
They make it really easy for people to get money. Especially people who are living in survival mode, it’s
quick and easy access to cash. (Key Informant)
Most of the study participants perceived that payday lending practices are predatory, expensive
and costly for borrowers. Key informants indicated that payday lenders are not meeting the
need but exploiting the situation of needy people. They term payday loans as notorious for high
interest rates and penalties. A few study participants called payday loans as ‘legitimized loan
shark service’. For many research participants, payday loans are the last option for most people
because payday lenders charge a very high interest rate (due to high risk nature of the loans).
Payday lenders, in their opinion, target low income individuals and exploit their situation.
Research participants believed that although there are certain regulations (i.e. explicit display of
interest rate/cost, cap on interest rate, etc), many payday lenders do not seem to observe those regulations. Study participants noted that despite provincial regulations, the payday loan
industry charges excessive fees for loans and cheque cashing.
It’s predatory; they are really hitting the lowest of the lower people that are in desperate situations. (Key
Informant)
They prey on individuals that have these strains or stresses in their lives. They can say that they’re
providing a service that is needed and sure... so is a drug dealer, I guess. But that doesn’t make it right.
(Key Informant)
Payday lending Practices in London 15
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Loans provided at exorbitant interest rates to individuals who do not have the credit capacity to obtain
loans through institutional lenders. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Key informants representing payday lending association noted that there is a misperception
about payday lenders and payday loans. They noted that payday lending is a regulated industry
that provides much needed help to individuals requiring money in emergencies. They said that
payday lenders provide a lot of financial educational resources to its customers, both in print
and online. Payday lenders, in particular members of the CPLA, provide free services to their
customers to better manage their finances.
Payday lending is a regulated industry. If a payday lender wasn’t available for individuals to borrow that
$200 or $300, where would they turn? Misinformation about the industry does no service to individuals
who are in need of this product. (Key Informant)
About the interest rate and hidden fee, it was pointed out that with new provincial regulations
introduced in 2010, all the payday lenders are required to display the inclusive cost of loan
explicitly. The combined fee and interest should be no more than 21%. CPLA representatives
welcomed any effort that would ensure adherence to the new regulation and deal with payday
lenders who do not follow the interest/cost cap regulation.
2.1.2 RELATIONSHIP OF PAYDAY LENDERS WITH OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Study participants provided their perceptions about the payday lenders’ relationships with other financial institutions such as banks. For a few community agency survey respondents, payday
lenders borrow money from banks to provide payday loans to low income individuals at a very
high interest rate. One respondent noted that banks actually operate payday lending stores
because they cannot provide service to individuals who have credit issues. Most of the key
informants reported that there is only a business/operational relationship between payday
lenders and banks. Generally, borrowers need to have a bank account that provides a
guarantee for repayment to payday lenders (usually with a post-dated cheque or pre-authorized
debit).
I imagine the payday lenders borrow money from banks and in turn borrow the money to others. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
They are run by banks that do not otherwise want to provide services to people with credit issues. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
For payday loans you have to have a “normal” bank account because you need to prove that your
paycheque or ODSP or CPP payment is going in somewhere – in order for them [payday lenders] to be
sure that they are going to get their money back. (Key Informant)
Some payday loan companies of course deal with the banks because the deposits have to be made by
the consumer borrowing payday loan product. Access has to be made to customer’s account, the
Payday lending Practices in London 16
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
customer decides if they want their account debited for the repayment of the loan. (Key Informant)
2.1.3 PROFITS OF PAYDAY LENDERS IN LONDON
There are no statistics available about the exact profits/costs of payday lenders. For many key informants and community agency survey respondents, payday lenders charge very high interest
rate and fees to provide small, short-term loans and, as a result, earn very good money. They
cited that rapid growth of payday lenders in many neighbourhoods speaks to the profitability of
the payday loan business.
Key informants representing CPLA as well as our review of a few research studies indicate that
payday lending is a risky business and cost of providing payday loans is very high. Payday lenders
have to incur a number of costs such as operating costs (e.g. staff salaries, computer systems,
rent), loan capital cost, and the cost of bad debts; the latter is considered to be the largest cost of all. According to a study conducted by Deloitte in 2008, the cost of providing a $100 payday
loan in Ontario was $20.63 According to CPLA representatives, the volume of payday loan
transactions creates profitability for payday lenders as opposed to interest/fee of providing
individual loans.
Money Mart for example is owned by the Dollar Financial Group which has created payday loan stores
in the US, Canada, England, Poland, Finland, all over the world - and their profitability in a particular
community, I wouldn’t even hazard to guess. (Key Informant)
Anecdotally, they are making very good money because these places are everywhere. They opened up a
payday loan place in a closed Blockbuster store. These places are everywhere. If they figure a certain
percentage of people don’t pay them back. It’s the $20 fees that they charge time and time again that
gives them money. (Key Informant)
I don’t know what sort of revenue they make. Suffice to say there are a number of them in London so
the revenue must be pretty decent. But they are still taking on some risk themselves, albeit very small, I
think. (Key Informant)
There’s a high cost to providing this product [payday loan] and there’s a high risk. Operating expenses
are huge so when you roll all that together it is not that profitable. (Key Informant)
2.2 PAYDAY LOAN BORROWERS IN LONDON
A study of consumer aspects of payday lending (2007) found that Canadian payday loan
consumers are more likely to have lower family incomes than non-consumers; are more likely
to be fully employed but have lower education levels; and, are more likely to live in larger
families with children. In addition to having lower income, these consumers are less likely to
have other sources of borrowing such as credit cards or financial reserves.
Payday lending Practices in London 17
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
There are no statistics available about the payday loan borrowers in London. Research
participants, however, provided broad demographic characteristics of individuals who typically
borrow from payday lenders in London. These characteristics confirm findings from other
studies conducted in Canada and elsewhere. Generally, study participants believe that payday
loan borrowers are individuals (more men than women) with low income, dependent on
ODSP/OW or social assistance, and those who do not have access to banking loan because of
their bad credit history. With little income and no other option available to get money, low
income individuals tend to borrow from payday lenders. Following are some of the excerpts
from community agency survey responses and key informant interviews explaining ‘who are the
payday loan borrowers in London’.
A lot of customers I would assume are on low income wages or government assistance. (Community
Agency Survey Respondent)
Individuals receiving OW can get their cheques cashed before the date. So, the OW cheques come out
and they are not cashable right away but they can cash them at the payday lending stores. (Key
Informant)
The poor, people with mental health issues who seek immediate gratification. (Community Agency
Survey Respondent)
People with minimal paying jobs, have additions, drug, alcohol or gambling. (Community Agency Survey
Respondent)
People who are generally on fixed incomes and have either maxed out or do not have access to more
traditional loans such as line of credits, overdraft or credit cards. (Community Agency Survey
Respondent)
Those who cannot obtain loans at a bank, trust company or credit union. Those who may not be able to
access credit cards. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Only a few study participants considered that payday loan borrowers belong to all income
groups and they are usually the individuals who have low financial literacy and do not know how
to manage their finances.
Moderate to higher income persons who lack the ability to manage finances. (Community Agency Survey
Respondent)
They typically are not good fiscal managers. Typically they’re not good at managing their existing money.
(Key Informant)
2.2.1 BORROWERS’ EXPERIENCE WITH BANKING SYSTEM
Except for two respondents, all others had some experience with the banking system (i.e. had
some kind of bank account). A large majority (89%) reported having a chequing account at a
Payday lending Practices in London 18
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
bank or credit union at the time when they borrowed payday loan; 71% had a debit card and
48% had a savings account. Other financial products/services included:
Credit card (22%)
Overdraft protection (15%)
A line of credit (8%)
The majority of survey respondents (61%) had very good/good experience at regular banks.
Only 9% indicated that they had a very bad/bad experience. Many respondents in their
qualitative responses also commented that they never had any problem and found that banks
are far better than payday lenders as they do not charge any fee.
Operation hours, machines located throughout city. Customer service is good. They treat you with
respect. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
When asked what stopped them from using bank products and services and made the switch to
35
65
52
16
6 11
2
A savings account (at a bank or credit
union)
A chequing account (at a bank
or credit union)
A debit card A credit card A line of credit Overdraft protection
I did not have any account at a bank
or credit union
Borrower Survey Which of the following financial products or services did you have at the time when you borrowed
a payday loan? (n=73)
Very good 30%
Good 31%
Just fine 30%
Bad 8%
Very bad 1%
Borrower Survey If you have used any of the financial services, how would you describe your experience at
regular banks? (n=71)
Payday lending Practices in London 19
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
payday loans, majority (55%) reported bad credit history as the main reason followed by non-
availability of small loans at banks (45%). Fourteen per cent of respondents did not even know
that they could borrow money from a bank. “Thought I have to have land (possessions) to
borrow”, commented one survey respondent. Thirteen per cent respondents indicated that too
much paper work is required using services at banks. Other reasons included:
Unfriendly staff (11%)
Location of banks (8%)
Hours of operation (7%)
Not having an ID (6%)
A few survey respondents commented that banks do not treat low income individuals with
respect and dignity. Moreover, they noted that banking services are more supportive and
accessible to those belonging to higher income levels. In their view, banks are not willing to
support and help those living in the margins of society.
Banks treat people with little money like they are less of a person. You have to meet certain income
levels to access services, instead of adjusting services based on income levels. (Borrower Survey
Respondent)
You need an income of over $40,000 a year to borrow from most banks and it cannot be social
assistance or child tax. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
A large number community agency survey respondents and key informants noted that people
borrow from payday lenders and not from banks or credit unions because of their poor credit
history or because they do not meet the eligibility criteria (e.g. lack of ID) for bank loans.
Sometimes the paperwork involved in getting loan approval also deters people from seeking
bank loans. In a few cases, previous bad banking experiences may cause individuals to switch
from banks to payday lenders. Many individuals with low income do not feel that bank staff
treat them with respect.
Banks and credit unions won't lend to people who live at or below the poverty line. They also don't lend small amounts. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
They may not be able to open bank accounts due to lack of identification or be overwhelmed by some of
the bureaucratic processes of applying for different places such as these. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
They do not get any help from banks or credit unions. They mistrust that system and usually had a bad
experience with bank or credit union. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
These clients don't always get respect from the bank when they try to resolve a situation or make
themselves heard. I have heard many stories of people being treated dreadfully because OW/ODSP is
Payday lending Practices in London 20
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
their source of income. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Lastly, lack of information about the availability of bank loans and the cost of borrowing from
payday lenders were identified as two other main reasons that many individuals switch from
banks to payday loans. Many people have misperceptions about opening a bank account, banking
fees and doing business with banks and credit unions, including, for example, overdraft
protection that banks offer.
For many of them, they are unaware of the laws that are out there that actually say that the banks are
relatively flexible on what we look for ID purposes and for opening accounts. In fact, we have to have a
low fee account to offer to customers. I think part of that is financial education – they don’t have to go
to these places to cash their ODSP cheques or whatever, they can go to any of the banks and do it that
way. (Key Informant)
There’s a perception that if you owe one bank money, the others will know about it. That’s not the truth
at all. If you only owe a couple service charges, we don’t put anything on the credit bureau or anything
like that; you can just go to bank and open an account there. (Key Informant)
One community agency survey respondent eloquently summarized the reasons for using payday loans instead of banks and credit unions. There are a number of reasons including:
past problems with banks---owe service charges such as ones for bounced checks;
garnishment issues on bank accounts;
costs of maintaining bank accounts;
poor treatment for those who viewed as poor; and
lack of educational material about the true costs of using pay day loans industry.
Payday lending Practices in London 21
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
2.2.2 SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND FREQUENCY OF BORROWING PAYDAY LOANS
Many respondents (39%) heard about payday loans through family members and friends. Nearly one-third survey respondents (31%) heard about payday loans through sign boards. Others
reported media (18%), flyers (8%) and other sources (4%) such as internet, colleagues, and
walking around the street. The majority of survey respondents (63%) borrowed money from
payday lenders at least once a month or more than once a month. Only 15% reported that they
borrowed only one time. Many survey respondents (46 out of 73) also reported using other
services from payday lenders; majority of them having used cheque cashing (67%) service
followed by pre-paid credit card and money transfers (37% each respectively). The majority of
survey respondents did not rollover a payday loan (i.e. received an extension of a payday loan
for a fee or issued a new payday loan to pay off a previous payday loan). However, more than
one-third (36%) loan borrowers did report rolling over a payday loan.
8 5 6
32
9
39
4
10
5
Unfriendly staff Hours of operation Location of banks Non-availability of small loans
Too much paper work
I had a bad credit history
I did not have any ID
I did not know that I can borrow from a
bank
Don't know
Borrower Survey What stopped you from using the financial products from banks and made you switch to a payday
loan? (n=71)
Payday lending Practices in London 22
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Friend 29%
Family member
10% Flyer 8%
Sign board 31%
TV/Radio/Newspaper
18%
Other 4%
Borrower Survey How did you first hear about payday loans?
(n=72) More than once a month
26%
Once a month
37%
One or two times per
year 22%
One time only 15%
Borrower Survey How often do/did you borrow payday loans?
(n=73)
67%
0
13%
37% 37%
19%
13%
28%
Cheque cashing Post box Telephone card Pre-paid credit card
Money transfers Gift card Sell gold Other
Borrower Survey Have you also used other services where payday loans are offered? (n=46)
Payday lending Practices in London 23
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
2.2.3 REASONS FOR BORROWING PAYDAY LOANS
Payday loans are provided to people who cannot get access to money from any informal source (e.g. family, and friends). Moreover, the payday lending industry exists because the "regular'
banking industry and other financial institutions do not provide needed services to those with a
lower income, i.e. small loans for emergencies. Borrower survey respondents identified three
most important reasons for borrowing payday loans. These reasons included meeting basic
needs (71%); bill payment (48%); and rent payment (46%). Only 10 respondents (out of 73)
indicated that they borrowed money for gambling and/or for alcohol. A large majority of
community agency survey respondents also noted that individuals use payday loans to pay for
their basic needs, including food, rent and/or utility bills. Other main reasons included meeting
expenses related to transportation, paying off loans, and to avoid bouncing a cheque. A few
community agency survey respondents also cited addiction and/or gambling as a reason for
borrowing payday loans.
Yes 36%
No 60%
Don't know
4%
Borrower Survey Have you ever rolled over a payday loan?
(n=73)
Payday lending Practices in London 24
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Following are some of the stories that community agency survey respondents provided about their clients who openly admitted using payday loans:
One of our clients is an OW participant who was at risk of having her hydro switched off and had
already accessed funds and programs of support in the past. She felt she had no choice so accessed a
loan and ended up in double her debt.
One of our clients had a pay cheque from a casual job. He did not have a bank account. He did not
have identification to open a bank account or $20.00 to deposit in an account. He needed the money to
pay his rent.
The client is addicted to both alcohol and gambling and has a limited income. He often binges on
alcohol and gambles while under the influence of alcohol. Following the binge he often requires payday
loans to cover rent, basic living needs, food. He no longer uses a bank as they have revoked any lending
privileges due to a poor repayment history.
34
6
35
52
10
28
19 19
9 11
3
7 10
Rent payment Mortgage payment
Bill payment Other basic needs
Medical or health related
expenses
Transportation To pay for other loans or
debts
To avoid bouncing a
cheque
Car repair Recreation Gambling Alcohol/liquor Other
Borrower Survey What did you use your payday loan money for? (n=73)
Payday lending Practices in London 25
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Case Study
Mary is a single mother in her 30s. She has a college diploma and is working fulltime in London. Mary borrowed
from payday lenders for two and a half years but does not use payday loans any longer. She began borrowing
from payday lenders to meet basic needs for herself and her young child. She used the money for rent,
groceries, bills and car insurance. She did not borrow money from a bank because she had a bad credit history
and thought that she would not be approved for a loan at her bank. During the two and a half years, she
borrowed from two different payday lenders at a time- and sometimes even three.
Mary believed that the best thing about payday lenders was the quick access to cash. She never had a bad
experience with payday lenders and customer service at the stores was quite good. The terms and conditions of
her loans were explained to her. Mary found the payday loans to be very expensive that created a ‘vicious
cycle’—she had to borrow from other payday lenders to repay the original loan.
Payday loan borrowing impacted Mary in two ways: financially and psychologically. Financially, she was ‘debt
trapped’ and had to borrow money from multiple lenders to keep the cycle running. She was paying a lot of
money in interest and in loan fees. Borrowing from payday lenders also had psychological and emotional
consequences on Mary’ life—it caused anxiety and stress especially when she would think that all her salary
would go into paying back loans and she would have to borrow again. Mary’s friend found her very stressed
during that two and a half year period. Looking back, Mary now realized the impact that her borrowing had on
her family. She noted that the money she was spending on borrowing payday loans could have been better spent
on her family. In her view, although payday loans serve an immediate financial need, the cost and impacts are
long-term. Mary’s friend recalled that when borrowing from payday lenders, Mary was not able to do anything
‘fun’ with her family; instead, her money was only going towards paying bills and repaying her loans.
The continued realization of how much it was costing her to borrow led Mary to stop borrowing. She shared
this realization in the following words: “I just remember working it out one time and being pretty shocked at
how much money I was giving them to just get money earlier and I just stopped.” She further explained that in
order to stop she had to pay her current loans off and be ‘pretty broke’ for a couple of weeks. Although it was a
sacrifice, Mary found this a better option than paying loans every two weeks. Mary had the support of her close
friend in creating a budget and plan so that she would not need to borrow any longer. Now that Mary was no
longer borrowing from payday lenders, Mary felt her life had improved quite a bit. She went back to school and
found a better job. About the future use of payday loans, she did not rule out it out completely because she is
the sole earner to provide for herself and for her son’s basic needs. However, payday loan would be her last
option and she would do everything she could to avoid it.
Mary was aware of a few money management resources in London. At one point, she used a debt counsellor but
did not find helpful. In her view, payday lending was a bigger issue than providing information on money
management to individuals who struggle financially: “I don’t think it’s a matter of people not always knowing how
to manage money-you can’t manage money you don’t have. The cost of living goes up and money does not [...]
it’s a lack of money and no financial literacy class is going to help with that”.
Payday lending Practices in London 26
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
2.2.4 SATISFACTION WITH PAYDAY LENDERS
A large majority of survey respondents (85%) reported that they signed a contract when they
obtained their payday loan. More than two-thirds (71%) survey respondents liked that payday
lenders were helpful in giving them money when they needed. More than half reported (57%)
that payday loans are good for emergencies. Other aspects of payday lending that survey
respondents liked included:
They don’t check my credit history (48%)
No waiting period to get cash (45%)
Location of payday lenders (44%)
Hours of operation (37%)
Quick service (36%)
Customer service (36%)
Convenient payment schedule (30%)
Courteous and non judgemental staff (30%)
Not too much paper work (26%)
Confidentiality/privacy (25%)
The terms and conditions were explained well (20%)
Other (7%)
In their qualitative response, a number of survey respondents appreciated the simplicity,
accessibility and convenience in obtaining payday loans. They liked the fact that payday lenders
are not judgemental and do not check their credit history. They noted that payday loans helped
them in emergencies to meet their needs. “It’s an evil necessity’, is how one survey respondent
described payday loans.
If anything it helped when needed to ensure the kids had proper food. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
It allowed us to get food when we needed. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Community agency survey respondents and key informants identified convenience, customer
service and perceived sense of anonymity when borrowing from a payday lender as the main
motivating factors.
It is fast, easy; [borrowers] think that it won't go on their financial record, it is anonymous. (Community
Agency Survey Respondent)
Customer service---when they go to these ........ places, maybe their buddies are going there. It’s really
convenient; they are open later than banks till 9 o’clock and 10 at some places. (Key Informant)
It’s the convenience factor. You walk in and in 20 minutes, you walk out with your requested sum of
money. (Key Informant)
Payday lending Practices in London 27
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Borrowers who used other services from payday lenders (e.g. cheque cashing, selling gold,
telephone card, etc) found them useful. In particular, they appreciated the very personalized
nature of the customer service they received.
Customer service is good. Go over info quickly - more of a sales than concern about you and budget.
They know they have you because you need them. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
However, a number of survey respondents found that using additional services, in particular
cheque cashing, from payday lenders were very expensive and costly and had negative
consequences for them. “I lost my jewellery”, commented one survey respondent. They
indicated that the service is convenient and quick but the cost of using any additional service is
very high.
With the cheques cashing service, I felt as though I was being cheated of my money and paying way too
much for a simple service. It seems that these services just take advantage of people in desperate
circumstances. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
For the cheque cashing service, it was at least $15 for every $100 cashed. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Yes 85%
No 7%
Don't know 8%
Borrower Survey Did you sign a contract when you obtained
your payday loan? (n=73)
Payday lending Practices in London 28
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
A large majority of the survey respondents did not like that payday lenders charge a high
interest rate on loans (77%) and charge a high loan fee (71%). Other aspects of payday lending
service that survey respondents did not like included:
Short payback periods (38%)
Collection practices (33%)
Lack of information about interest rates
Other (19%)
Many respondents noted that the interest rate/cost of borrowing a payday loan was very high. Most of them indicated that they were charged between 21-25% (for two weeks); a few said
that the cost was as high as 60% of the loan borrowed, while a couple of respondents noted
that it was not possible to give a real estimate of the cost involved. “Most people are not aware
of the "overall" costs (fine print)”, said one survey respondent. Survey respondents noted that
there are ‘hidden’ costs associated with lending that go beyond the interest rate. A few survey
respondents found the collection practices of payday lenders very stressful and threatening.
They pointed out that payday lenders would come to their house and send threatening
messages.
Interest rates used to be over 50%; the legislation has banned anything over 23%. However, there are other costs associated with lending, that are not included in the 23%2. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
2 These are respondents’ perceptions. According to the legislation, individuals can only be charged $21 on $100 borrowed.
32 27
22
52
26
42 35 33
26 22 19
15 18 11
5
Borrower Survey What do you like best about payday lending services? (n=73)
Payday lending Practices in London 29
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
They [payday lenders] actually used to come to my house and bang on my door. They used to send me
threatening messages and even leave my paperwork in my neighbours’ mail box. (Borrower Survey
Respondent)
Survey respondents who did not borrow payday loans any longer reported that they stopped borrowing because of high interest rate and cost associated with the loan. They noted that the
interest rate/fee was very high and they ended up paying almost double the amount they
borrowed. Many felt trapped and wanted to get out of the trap as they were experiencing high
levels of stress. A few respondents stopped borrowed because they either had a bad
experience with payday lender (i.e. not having flexible payment schedule) and were not simply
eligible or qualify for payday loans (i.e. no regular income). For some of the respondents who
stopped borrowing, better budgeting of their finances helped them.
It did not make sense economically. I was actually spending more in the long run. Instead, I decided to wait until I got paid and live on a tighter budget in the mean time. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
I realized that it was a cycle that would continue if I did not stop. Pay cheques would be eaten up and fees made it very difficult to stay ahead. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Eventually I stopped because it cost too much money to borrow and I ended up in a rut. (Borrower
Survey Respondent)
I stopped because I borrowed money and realized that ‘oh my God they're getting my whole cheque’. I
thought no way and closed bank account so they wouldn't be able to take my money. I just turned the
77%
30%
38%
71%
33%
19%
High interest rate Lack of information about interest rate
Short payback period High loan fee Collection practices (calling at home)
Other
Borrower Survey What are things that you don't like about payday loans? (n=73)
Payday lending Practices in London 30
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
other way. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Even though the fees are supposed to be regulated they hit you with "bank fees" and lender's fees which puts up the amount that you have to pay back. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Overall, when survey respondents were asked how likely they were to use payday lending
services in the future, the majority of them (57%) said not likely at all or a little likely to use the
payday loan service in the future. Less than one-third of survey respondents (29%), however,
reported that they would use payday loan service in the future.
Expressing his/her sentiments about borrowing from payday lenders, one survey respondent
commented: “I felt dirty, as a failure, unable to make ends meet, beggar, embarrassed, ashamed,
angry, and disgusted.”
2.2.5 IMPACT OF BORROWING PAYDAY LOANS
Survey respondents noted mostly negative impact of borrowing from payday lenders on their
life. The most significant impacts included falling into a debt trap (56%), dropping month income
(49%), and experiencing high level of stress (48%). Only 14% of respondents said that
borrowing from payday lender made them happier. Other negative impacts included:
Not able to meet needs of the family (20%)
Strained relations with family (18%)
Strained relations with friends (11%)
Becoming aggressive (9%)
Other (3%)
Losing assets (1%)
It made me happier the first time. Never thought how hard it would be to get out of it. (Borrower Survey
Respondent)
Very likely 12%
Likely 17%
Somewhat likely 14%
A little likely 13%
Not likely at all
44%
Borrower Survey How likely are you to use payday loan service
in the ftuure? (n=72)
Payday lending Practices in London 31
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Once you borrow from them, it’s a downwards spiral. You’ve already borrowed against your next
paycheque, your paycheque comes in and it goes to the Money Mart people. You need money to eat so
you have to borrow another one. It’s a vicious cycle. (Key Informant)
A family I am working with recently shared with me they currently have 3 loans and have no idea how
they are going to pay the money back. They have described very high interests rates and are getting
themselves deeper and deeper in the hole of which they are not going to be able to get out of.
(Community Agency Survey)
Using other services from payday lenders also had mostly negative consequences. Significant
negative consequences included paying much more than the value of the service (56%),
experiencing high level of stress (48%), and feelings of remorse (37%). Only 9% of respondents said that using other services from payday lenders made them happier. Other negative
consequences included:
Not able to meet needs of the family (24%)
Strained relations with friends (13%)
Strained relations with family (11%) Becoming aggressive (9%)
Other (6%)
Losing assets (4%)
41
1
36
15 13
8 7
35
10 11
2
Fell into a debt trap
Lost my assets My monthly income dropped
I was not able to meet the needs
of my family
I had strained relations with my
family
I had strained relations with my
friends
I became aggressive
I experienced high levels of
stress
It made me happier
Don't know Other
Borrower Survey What has been the impact of borrowing from payday lenders on your life? (n=73)
Payday lending Practices in London 32
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Half of the respondents did not face any difficulty in paying back a payday loan on time while
47% of the respondents had challenges paying back their payday loan money on time.
Many respondents who faced difficulties in paying back payday loans rolled over or re-
borrowed from somewhere else to pay back their loans. Some respondents were able to
negotiate flexible payment arrangements with payday lenders. A few mentioned they had to
skip paying a utility bill or ended up buying fewer groceries or have to cut down their food
expenditures.
26
2
11
5 6
4
22
17
4
9
3
Paid much more than the value of
the service
Lost my assets I was not able to meet the needs
of my family
I had strained relations with my
family
I had strained relations with my
friends
I became aggressive
I experienced high levels of
stress
Feelings of remorse
It made me happier
Don't know Other
Borrower Survey If you have used other services where payday loans are offered, what have been the consequences of
using those services? (n=46)
Yes 47%
No 50%
Don't know 3%
Borrower Survey Have you ever had dificulty in paying back a
payday loan on time? (n=72)
Payday lending Practices in London 33
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Most people, eventually, have difficulty paying the loans back; if not immediately. Rollover loans are
illegal. However, there are different names for them that mean the same thing. A loan can be partially
paid back, with a new loan extended to the customer. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
I had to borrow money from another source to pay the money back. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Made payment arrangements and went in once per week and paid what I could until balance was paid. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
I had to get another payday loan or skip a bill or buy fewer groceries. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
I told them I couldn’t pay it this month, and they took all my money out of the bank. My son could not eat that month. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Payday lending Practices in London 34
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Case Study
Sarah is in her 20s, has a college diploma, and is working fulltime. She earns around $45,000 annually and
does not borrow from payday lenders any longer. She has been living in London for the past 12 years. Sarah
started borrowing from payday lenders four years ago when her five-person household was living on a
single income. Finding it hard to make ends meet, Sarah and her spouse decided to borrow from a payday
lender and the borrowing escalated from that point on. Sarah first learned of payday lending from ‘lots of
advertising’ about their products. She read the sign outlining the cost of borrowing and thought that if she
borrowed $300, she would only be required to pay $321. She soon found out that this was not the case;
instead she paid $363. Moreover, Sarah had to pay other costs such as ‘account fees’, ‘monthly card fees’
and broker fees’. Sarah never rolled over. Her consistent borrowing from the same store allowed her to
borrow greater amounts of money. In one instance she was able to borrow $820 because they knew her by
name at the store and were able to ‘stretch the limit’ for her.
Payday loan borrowing had an impact on Sarah and her family. She suffered from depression and often
would become stressed when the time to pay back loans arrived. Borrowing also strained her relationship
with her spouse due to the financial burdens they were facing in repaying loans. Sarah also sought the
assistance of her parents who were able to provide her with some money to help alleviate her financial
situation. Having to seek her parent’s help caused additional stress because she felt that she disappointed
them by getting caught in such a ‘debt trap’. However, Sarah’s mother did not feel that there was a change
in their relationship. In her view, they just tried to help Sarah with providing some money as well as help in
budgeting. Overall, Sarah felt ashamed for having to borrow money, but also felt relief when she did
because it meant she could provide the basic necessities for her family, including food.
Although Sarah did not plan not to borrow from payday lenders in the future, she recognized that
something might come up that would lead her to borrow again-just as has happened in the past. Both Sarah
and her mother noted that with increased household income, they would need to focus on better budgeting
their finances.
Sarah noted that community resources providing financial information could help individuals who face
financial hardships. Specifically, the program should include information about ‘how to budget’ and ‘how to
make your budget work’. Sarah believed that keeping in touch with individuals [clients of programs] is a key
to making sure clients follow-through with their budgeting plan. In her opinion, both one-on-one and group
counselling are good approaches for any financial education program. In addition, she also wanted an
alternative to payday lending for those individuals who might have bad credit history and were not eligible
for bank loans.
Payday lending Practices in London 35
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
3. FINANCIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM
In this study, we asked participants about the potential need and viability of a community-wide
financial education program in London. Before providing specific comments about a community-
wide financial education program, a large majority of survey respondents and key informants
provided comments about a general need for an alternative to payday lending.
More than four-fifths of borrower survey respondents (81%) and more than three-quarters
community agency survey respondents (76%) indicated that there is a need for an alternative to
payday lending. A large majority of respondents (84% borrowers and 83% community agencies)
would like the alternative to provide loans at a lower interest rate with clear information about
the fee/interest rate (73% borrowers and 96% community agencies). Survey respondents
suggested that a bank or other small businesses similar to payday lending should provide small
emergency loans to low income individuals with lower interest rates/fees. Such a business
should provide clear information about the cost of borrowing as well as provide them with
information about how to effectively manage their finances. Other elements of an alternative
that borrower survey respondents suggested are given below in order of their preference.
Friendly service (55%)
Convenient hours (52%)
Convenient location (43%)
Providing telephone card service (25%)
Providing money transfer service (23%)
Providing post box service (12%)
Other (12%)
The same banks that people use on a daily basis need to provide micro-services for those with lower
incomes at reasonable costs to help people manage their finances especially when they only get money once a month. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
You need something in between (in between a bank and payday loan service), a small business, that
deals with low income people. Better interest rates; once they give you a loan they tell you about money
management, help you out when you pay it back and how to avoid the situation in the future. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Something where they do the same thing [provide small loans] but minimize loaning fee/interest (e.g. $5 for $50). Keep interest rate low. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Payday lending Practices in London 36
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
A few research participants cautioned about an alternative to payday lending. In their view, low
income individuals might continue to borrow from payday lenders even if there is an option of
obtaining a short term, low cost loan. This would make them more indebted and would worsen
their situation. They suggested holding a community dialogue around this issue.
I would like to hear community debate on this issue. For our clients, it would be problematic because
they would probably use both and get deeper into debt. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
More than two-thirds of borrower respondents (71%) noted that there is a need for a
service that provides education about managing money and credit (i.e. financial
literacy). Some respondents thought that the real issue is effectively managing finances to avoid
getting debt trapped. In their view, launching an alternative that provides low interest loans
would be waste of resources. They suggested that awareness should be created among low
income individuals about these services in the community.
I think the only acceptable alternative is financial literacy and teaching ways to better manage money;
not another place you can borrow (waste) money. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
If I knew how to better manage my money then I don't think I would've needed a payday loan. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Yes 81%
No 19%
Borrower Survey Is there a need for an altnernative to payday
lending? (n=69)
Yes 76%
Unsure 24%
Community Agency Survey Is there a need for an alternative to payday
lending? (n=33)
Payday lending Practices in London 37
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
4.1 KNOWLEDGE ABOUT EXISTING FINANCIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Nearly two-thirds borrower survey respondents (66%) were not aware of any service in London that provides information on how to better manage their money. A large majority of
community agency survey respondents (80%) indicated that they were aware of
programs/services that provide information to community members to better manage their
money. Most of the survey respondents, borrowers as well as community agencies, who were
aware of any existing financial education service/program frequently named Family Service
40 41
31
47
24
29
7
14 13
7
Provide education about managing
money and credit
Provide clear information about
the fee/interest rate
Friendly service Lower interest rate Convenient location Convenient hours Post box service Telephone card Money transfers Other
Borrower Survey If there is a need for a payday alternative, what would be its key elements? (n=56)
28
24 22 22
16
22
Provide clear informaiton about the fee/interest
rate
Low interest rate Convenient location Convenient hours of operation
Provide other services Friendly customer service
Community Agency Survey If there is a need for an alternative, what would be key elements of an alternative? (n=29)
Payday lending Practices in London 38
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Thames Valley Credit Counselling program. A few respondents mentioned the names of
Goodwill Industries, seminars at church, programs at the London Public Library, Junior
Achievement (for grade 7 and 8) and bulletin boards at community centres that contain
information about a number of different programs on money management. A large majority of
borrower respondents (79%) reported not using financial education service in the past. Only a
couple of respondents reported using Family Service Thames Valley credit counselling services
but noted that it was not lack of budgeting but acute shortage of financial resources to meet
their daily needs. ‘There was nothing to budget; money goes to rent and food”, commented
one borrower survey respondent.
More than three-quarters of borrower survey respondents (77%) indicated that they would
have used a community service that provides information to better manage their money if they
had known about it. Some respondents, who reported that they would not use the community
service even if they knew, provided two main reasons for their response. The most frequently
cited reason was ‘I already know but do not have enough money to manage’. Not having
enough time to avail any financial education service was another reason.
I know how to manage my money. Sometimes I just don't have enough available to make ends meet so I
Yes 34%
No 66%
Borrower Survey Are you aware of any service in
London/Middlesex that provides information on how to better manage your money? (n=70)
Yes 80%
No 20%
Community Agency Survey Are you aware of any program in that provides
information to community members on how to better manage money? (n=35)
Yes 21%
No 79%
Borrower Survey Have your ever used that service in the past?
(n=48)
Yes 77%
No 23%
Borrower Survey If you knew about the community service that provides information to better manage your
money, would you have used it? (n=64)
Payday lending Practices in London 39
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
need to borrow it. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
It’s not the management - it's simply not having enough. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
The reality is when you have little money to start out with and the cost of living (i.e. basic needs such as
food and shelter) is higher than the income you receive or earn working; you are sometimes left without
a choice. (Borrower Survey Respondent)
Almost half of the community agency survey respondents (47%) noted that existing financial
education programs are not meeting the needs of the community; only 17% indicated that the
existing financial education programs are meeting the need to ‘very much and much’ extent.
Community agency survey respondents noted that there is a lack of awareness about the
existing financial education programs and people face barriers (e.g. transportation) to attending
these programs, including long waiting lists for some of the services that provide one-on-one
counselling. A few respondents indicated that the existing financial education programs do not
provide comprehensive information about the banking rules and cost of borrowing from payday
lenders and possible alternatives.
Existing programs are not really visible, often referred by someone else but many people needing the help may not have connections in community. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
There is a long waiting list for some of the [financial education] services; the others are crisis driven with little capacity for prevention work. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
There is not enough information to working poor/those on social assistance about true costs of using
payday loan industry and possible alternatives. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
4.2 NEED FOR A FINANCIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM
Identifying this as a gap, a large majority of the community agency survey respondents indicated
that there is a need for a community-wide financial education program in London—80% noted
that a community wide financial education program is very much needed/need.
Almost four-fifths community agency survey respondents (79%) reported that people would
benefit from a community-wide financial education program.
Payday lending Practices in London 40
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
A number of research participants noted that providing financial education service to people, in
particular low income individuals, is very much needed in tough economic times and during
emergencies. In their view, better budgeting could save many low income families from falling
into debt traps. The financial education program should not only teach people about budgeting
but also should provide information about cost of borrowing from different sources, including
payday lenders. The financial education program should provide information as to how
traditional lenders (i.e. banks) can help low income individuals.
Study participants representing payday lending industry also confirmed the need of providing
financial education program to community members. They pointed out that many payday
lenders are already providing online and published financial education resources to their
customers to help them make informed choices.
Broad education strategies are needed because more & more people are struggling financially in this community as decent jobs with good wages disappear. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
There really does need to be some financial literacy. Things like the credit rating and basic financial stuff
Very much 7%
Much 10%
Somewhat 36%
A little 37%
Not at all 10%
Community Agency Survey To what extent are the existing finanical educaiton program (s) meeting the needs of the community?
(n=30)
Very much needed
71%
Needed 9%
Somewhat needed
11%
Maybe needed
3%
Not at all needed
6%
Community Agency Survey Do you think there is a need for a community wide
financial education program? (n=35)
Very likely 53%
Likely 26%
Somewhat likely 15%
Not at all likely 6%
Community Agency Survey How likely is that people would benefit from a
community financial education program? (n=34)
Payday lending Practices in London 41
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
should be taught to people. (Key Informant)
If people understood how the rent to own places and the pay day loans etc. actually work they may be
less likely to sign up without talking to someone. (Community Agency Survey)
I use Money Mart as an example because it’s a large company. If you go to the website, there is a
financial education portal. If you go to that portal, they offer you financial education. (Key Informant)
Case Study
Karen is a single mom in her 30s with part-time job where she works less than 20 hours a week. She
earns $20,000 to $30,000 per year and is a payday loan borrower. She began borrowing from payday
lenders about a year and a half ago. Struggling to make ends meet, she decided to begin borrowing to
pay for rent, bills, food and sometimes alcohol. Her bad credit history also contributed to borrowing
payday loan.
Her negative experiences with payday lenders included dealing with hidden fees, such as card fees
when there was no balance on the card. Karen had used three different stores to borrow payday
loans. Lately, there was one payday lender which she preferred to use over others because they gave
borrowers straight cash. Karen also considered that interest rate and fees were lower at her
preferred store than other payday lenders.
The year and a half of borrowing from payday lenders had an impact on Karen’s life. In addition to
feeling embarrassed that she could not pay off her loan, she was unable to share this information with
her family because she believed they would become very upset with her. Karen’s friends also lectured
her about her borrowing and getting caught in the cycle. Overall, she described the impact of her
borrowing as “really negative and nothing good comes from it all.”
Karen noted that financial literacy programming is very important for teaching individuals how to save
money as well as how to live within your budget. She said that the cost of living rises, salaries do not,
making it difficult for those on a low or fixed income to both save and budget reasonably. In addition
to having a community program through agencies such as the John Howard Society and the Children’s
Aid Society, Karen suggested that offering programming through the universities and colleges would
also be a good idea which would reach everyone, including students. In her view, reaching students
and young people is very important in helping them early on with money management. She suggested
starting community kitchens where individuals could come and make meals to take home to their
families who struggle with buying food. Karen believed that if there were a way to get small loans with
low interest with the sole purpose of allowing borrowers to get through with the basic necessities, it
would be a great help.
Payday lending Practices in London 42
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Community partners also expressed some concerns about the community-wide financial
education program in London. In their view, payday lending is a broader/structural issue of
distribution of resources and financial education program would only help those who have
money to manage—it would not work for poor people who have too little to manage. They suggested addressing the underlying causes of poverty and lack of loan options in emergencies,
especially for low income individuals.
In terms of low income people I believe that they often have good budgeting skills but live so close to poverty that they can’t juggle what they don’t have. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
The people I am speaking of are on OW are single and have no money to manage. All their money
would be taken from them if they went to a bank. They cannot afford to have this happen to them, so they keep cycling through the system using the cash places. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Education will not stop people from getting a pay day loan if it's the only option and they need food or
pay the rent. Underlying causes such as poverty and lack of affordable loan options also need to be
tackled. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Payday lending Practices in London 43
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
4. SUGGESTIONS FOR A FINANCIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM
Study participants provided a number of suggestions for a community-wide financial education
program in London. Community agency survey respondents, in particular, were asked to
provide their comments about the effectiveness and importance of several delivery settings,
mechanisms and promotion strategies if a community-wide financial education program were to
be launched in London. For the analysis purpose, the response categories were ranked on a
scale of 1 to 5 where:
1 =Not at all effective/important
2= A little effective/important
3= somewhat effective/important
4= Effective/important
5= Very effective/important
The closer the mean score is to 5, the higher is the rating of that setting, mechanism or strategy.
4.1 PREFERRED SETTINGS AND DELIVERY MECHANISMS
In terms of delivery settings, integrating financial literacy training into other/existing services
was considered most important followed by teaching financial skills in high schools. Online
settings received the lowest score among all the response categories.
Table: Delivery Settings for a Financial Education Program
Delivery settings Mean score
Teaching of financial life skills in high school 4.34
(n=32)
Integrating financial literacy training into other services (e.g.
employment support programs, settlement program for newcomers,
etc)
4.39
(n=31)
Providing information and training at the workplace 3.94
(n=31)
Providing information and training at community centres 3.94
(n=31)
Providing online resources for community members 3.71
(n=31)
Online resources already exist. Teaching of financial life skills in high school already exists (however, not
Payday lending Practices in London 44
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
all students may be exposed as it is in certain programs/classes). Integrating into other services may work - but the focus needs to be on one-to-one. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
If you are already helping people in one part of their life, adding on financial literacy would be really
helpful as well. (Key Informant)
Perhaps should be taught as part of high school curriculum. Perhaps make it a mandatory course, required for graduation. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
I would question whether online would work very well because a lot of people are not online. (Key Informant)
Some of the research participants suggested creating an outreach team to provide financial
education across the community, in particular at subsidized housing and apartment buildings and
at public places such as shopping malls and libraries.
Financial outreach workers are a fantastic idea. It would be best if they could be matched with some
other sort of benefit that they are giving them at the same time. (Key Informant)
Regarding delivery mechanisms, a large majority of respondents considered one-on-one
coaching and mentoring to be the most effective (mean score 4.38) followed by group delivery
(mean score 3.84). Published materials such as flyers and newsletters received the lowest
ranking among all the response categories. Generally, study participants considered that one-
on-one coaching and mentoring with tailored information would be most effective and it could
be combined with group sessions for providing general financial information.
Table: Delivery Mechanisms for a Financial Education Program
Delivery mechanism Mean score
One-on-one coaching and mentoring 4.38
(n=32)
Group delivery (e.g. workshops, seminars) 3.84
(n=32)
Published materials (flyers, newsletters) 3.19
(n=31)
Online resources and guidance 3.32
(n=31)
Obviously, one-on-one would be a good idea. Seminars could work as well but I don’t know how many
people would actually go. (Key Informant)
Coaching and mentoring one to one is very costly, but probably the only effective way of helping
someone change. There are already online resources Published materials are costly and not all that
effective group delivery meet the needs of the most needy. They are not likely to attend group, nor would their behaviours change with a workshop/seminar. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Payday lending Practices in London 45
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
I would say flyers or pamphlets would not really do a lot. Any agency anywhere doing social services,
there are lots of pamphlets that haven’t been touched. (Key Informant)
4.2 FINANCIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM PROMOTION
Community agency survey respondents also ranked various promotion strategies for a financial
education program. They identified that providing information at locations close to where
people live would be the most effective promotion strategy followed by providing incentives to
participants (e.g. providing food, childcare and covering transportation costs).
Table: Promoting Strategies for a Financial Education Program
Promoting strategy Mean score
Providing incentives to participants (e.g. providing food/meals,
childcare, covering transportation costs)
4.57
(n=30)
Providing information at locations close to where people live 4.58
(n=31)
Providing information at central places (e.g. community centres,
shopping malls)
4.20
(n=30)
Scheduling information sessions at convenient times for different
population groups
4.39
(n=31)
Childcare/transportation costs are not incentives per say, they are removing barriers to access service.
(Community Agency survey Respondent)
4.3 KEY LOCATIONS AND TARGET POPULATION
All the research participants identified key locations where financial education programs are
most needed: Many indicated that low income neighbourhoods, particularly areas where
individuals who are on social assistance and/or living in subsidized housing, and areas where
payday loans are easily accessible are in most need of financial education programs and services.
Some research participants noted that financial education programs and services are needed
across the city as well as in rural areas. In their view, assumptions should not be made about
particular neighbourhoods and provide financial education to all at different community centres
across the city.
Recipients that receive OW ODSP should go with their cheques. All the subsidized housing complexes
should be targeted. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Anywhere where you have pockets of poverty is where you want to target.(Key Informant)
All neighborhoods! I think you are making assumptions about wealthy and poor people once you start
looking at neighborhoods, and those assumptions may not always be correct. (Community Agency Survey
Payday lending Practices in London 46
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
Respondent)
Some community agency survey respondent mentioned priority neighbourhoods that should be
the target of any financial education program. These neighbourhoods include:
Downtown, east of Adelaide
College and University neighbourhoods
Huron, Boulee, Limberlost, Southdatle etc
Downtown London
Kipps Lane, Pond Mills, Sherwood Forest Area,
Study participants also provided ideas to make the financial education program relevant to
different population groups. It was suggested that school would be an ideal setting for delivering
a financial education program for youth. One specific recommendation was to deliver Junior
Achievement programs to all students. It was noted that the program should be interactive and
engaging enough to retain interest of young people.
I think most effective would be having this particular program in high school. That to me is where it
starts and it is going to have a huge impact down the line on the education of the future consumer. (Key
Informant)
For low income individuals, information about the program could be inserted with their
OW/ODSP cheques. Peer-to-peer mentoring was also proposed; whereby people who have
been or are from low income speak about strategies to effectively manage their finances. It was
strongly suggested that an outreach strategy coupled with some incentives would be most
effective in making the program relevant to low income individuals. For newcomers, it was
proposed that financial education program should be made part of the existing
settlement/employment services. For the Aboriginal population, outreach was considered the
most effective strategy.
There are lots of programs to help new immigrants when they come to Canada. That would be a great
spot to say, “This is how the banking system in Canada works”. (Key Informant)
For seniors, providing financial education services at senior centres would be most beneficial.
Community centres and shelters were considered important places to promote the program among women. Trained care providing professionals would be most suitable to provide
information to individuals living with any mental, physical, and development disability.
4.4 IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS
We asked study participants, in particular community agency survey respondents and key
informants, to provide their suggestions about who should lead a community-wide financial
education program in London and who should be involved as partners in
Payday lending Practices in London 47
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
implementing such a program. There were three main suggestions about who should lead a
community-wide financial education program. First, the municipal government in collaboration
with ODSP and OW could lead the implementation of a community-wide financial education
program. It was pointed out that ODSP and OW have a broader outreach to low income
individuals who receive support from OW and/or ODSP. Second, community agencies focusing
on poverty issues, such as United Way, could take the lead because of their presence across
the city. Third, financial institutions such as banks and credit unions could assume a leadership
role in implementing a community-wide financial education program. It was indicated that
financial institutions have more resources and up to date information about different financial
aspects.
Ontario Works would have the ability to reach a lot of impoverished people and to get them to attend.
(Community Agency Survey Respondent)
I believe that Ontario Works could potentially make a greater impact in this area by making financial planning a participation requirement. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
United Way or a central and diverse hub organization [should take the lead]. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Let the private sector take a lead (like a bank). Why not? They have more resources, more reach. (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Research participants noted that the financial education program should be delivered in
collaboration with various community partners such as community agencies, government,
educational institutions, financial institutions, including payday lenders. Study participants
provided a list of community agencies that could be involved in the implementation of a
community wide financial literacy program. These included:
Family Service Thames Valley
Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA)
London Homeless Coalition
London Intercommunity Health Centre
Goodwill Industries, Ontario Great Lakes
WIL Employment Connections
Youth Opportunities Unlimited (YOU)
Centre for Lifelong
Family Service London-Middlesex
Street Connection
Atlosha
Mission Services of London
The Salvation Army Centre of Hope
Women's Community House
Payday lending Practices in London 48
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
My Sisters' Place
London Coffee House
Involvement of the municipal government, OW, ODSP, public libraries and community centres
was also suggested in implementing the financial education program in London. It was suggested
that classes should be delivered at schools, the university and Fanshaw College. All the financial
institutions (i.e. banks and credit unions) could be invited to be part of this community initiative,
including CPLA members.
I would imagine that the initial move would be to have a stakeholder meeting. You put the word out to
CPLA, to banks, to credit unions, to credit counselling agencies – say ‘c’mon in, we’re serving sandwiches
and we want to discuss this issue’. (Key Informant)
Our bank has a very large presence in London. So we would be fairly open to that. For us to be able to
increase the literacy of the population will help the banks in the longer term in terms of helping people.
(Key Informant)
To be honest, our customer service representatives [at payday lenders], if they have any indication that
this customer is in some kind of distress beyond the need of a couple hundred dollars to keep the power
on, they say, take this brochure, call your local credit counsellor agency. (Key Informant)
Community partners cautioned that if not properly implemented, the financial program might
end up failing. First of all, they wanted to make sure that a community-wide financial education
program should not duplicate what already exists in London—it rather should complement
those efforts that are already there in place. The success of the financial education program
would also depend on its accessibility (no waiting list, venue, and central location), meeting
needs of individual clients and expert and trained staff that deliver the program. Buy-in from the
wider community was also suggested for the program to succeed. A few respondents noted
that the financial education program should also cater to the needs of individuals living with
mental health challenges. Lastly, it was proposed that the program should have success
indicators to monitor its progress/impact. “What would the metrics be - i.e. increased
knowledge; increased use of banks; or decreased use of payday loans”, questioned one survey
respondent.
It will be important to be sure it builds on the expertise and already existing programming in the
community. Don't duplicate what is already is existing. (Community Agency Survey Respondent
Depending on how/where it is offered and that it accommodates the needs of the participants.
(Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Make it as accessible as possible; don't make people wait in line or be put on a waiting list. (Community
Agency Survey Respondent)
Only hope that it is simple, easy to attend, short presentation on why need for education, tie attendance
Payday lending Practices in London 49
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
into remuneration along with stipend for expenses to attend (food, bus fare, time) (Community Agency Survey Respondent)
Our clients would unlikely attend any program offered because of the high percentage of mental health
and drug issues. (Community Agency Survey)
Payday lending Practices in London 50
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
5. CONCLUSION
This research study on payday lending practices focused on three main areas: payday lenders in
London; payday borrowers in London; and financial education in London.
There are around many payday lending outlets in London. There is no data available about the
profits of payday lenders in London. However, the increasing number of payday lending stores
opening in London points to the fact that it may be a profitable business. Payday lenders and
other financial institutions have an operational relationship as borrowers need to have a bank
account to receive a loan from a payday lender.
Payday loan borrowers are men and women, low income; dependent on Ontario Disability
Support Program (ODSP), Ontario Works (OW) or social assistance; as well as those who
have a bad credit history, thus, do not have access to a loan through a bank. However, some
participants said that payday loan borrowers belong to all income levels. The most common
reasons for borrowing money from payday lenders were: to meet basic needs, pay bills and
rent. The impact of borrowing from payday lenders was most often negative. Some of these
impacts included: falling into a debt trap; dropping monthly income; and high levels of stress.
There is a need for a community-wide financial education program in London. The community-
wide financial education program would be best delivered through an existing service and that
one-on-one counselling would be the most effective delivery mechanism.
Payday lending Practices in London 51
www.communitybasedresearch.ca
APPENDICES
- Payday loan outlets in London
- Data collection tools
o Key informant interview protocol
o Case study interview protocol (first person-borrower)
o Case study interview protocol (second person)
o Borrower survey
o Community agency survey