Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009
-
Upload
jgabateman -
Category
Business
-
view
1.715 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009
![Page 1: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Township of Langley 2008 Pavement Management System Study
Prepared by
EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.
![Page 3: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Contents
• Project Background• Data Collection • Road Network Present Conditions in 2008• Road Network Assessment and Comparison to other Agencies• Highway Development and Management (HDM) Distress Prediction
Modeling• Road Network Predicted Condition in 2018 • Analysis Inputs• Analysis Results
– Road Network Predicted Condition at Current Funding Levels– Road Network Predicted Condition at Recommended Funding
Levels
![Page 4: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Project Background
Township of Langley’s Pavement Management History• Pavement Management System Installed in 2002/2003;• The last full Pavement Condition Surveys were conducted in:
– 2005 MRN Roads (TransLink);
– 2007 Major Roads (Arterial, Collector & Grid roads);
– 2005 & 2006 Local roads (Minor roads).
The objectives of this study are:• Update analysis to reflect current construction pricing;• Analysis of Major, local and MRN roads;• Determine the optimal annual funding level that will indefinitely sustain the quality and value of the pavement network; and • Integrate all pavement condition and analysis results in the Township’s GIS;• Update the City’s in-house systems to incorporate latest work.
![Page 5: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Pavement InventoryTownship of Langley has approximately 930 centreline km of road
(813 centreline-km of Paved road considered in analysis)
Class Length (cl-km)
MRN 59 )
Arterial 101
Collector 106
Grid 121
Local 426 )
Major Roads Analysis
Local Roads Analysis
HWY * 56RAMP 11Unsurveyed Lanes 12Unserveyed Gravel 26Unsurveyed Locals 12Total unsurveyed 117
Unsurveyed Routes
* Includes Hwy 1 EB and WB, Hwy 10, unsurveyed parts of 264 St & 264 St Diversion
MRN Roads Analysis
![Page 6: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Township of Langley’s Road Network
Road Network Classification
Provincial Highways
MRN Routes
Arterial Routes
Collector Routes
Grid
Local Routes
Private/ new locals (Not Surveyed)
Municipal Boundary
![Page 7: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
All Cracked Area (ACA) as a Measure of Pavement Condition
Condition From ACA
To ACA
Colour
V Good 0% 1%
Good 1% 5%
Fair 5% 10%
Poor 10% 30%
V Poor 30% 100%
![Page 8: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Data Collection
Cracking = 0 - 1 %Preventative Maintenance(crack sealing)$1.70 - $3.00/m2
Cracking = 1 - 10 %Overlay, Grind and Patch$15 - $30/m2
![Page 9: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Data Collection
Cracking = 10 - 30%(Overlay, Grind and Patch)$30 - $40/m2
Cracking > 30%(Replace Asphalt)$40 - $65/m2
![Page 10: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major Roads – 2007/08
0 – 1% (V Good) = 133 km 40%1 – 5% (Good) = 98 km 30%5 – 10% (Fair) = 42 km 13%10 – 30% (Poor) = 50 km 15%
Avg. Cracking measured in 2007 = 5.5%
30 – 100% (V Poor) = 5 km 2% Total = 328 km
Avg. Cracking after 2008 Paving = 5.0%
![Page 11: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Recommended Funding vs Actual (major roads)
• Average Cracking in 2000 = 5.2%• Average Cracking in 2003 = 4.7%• Recommended Funding in 2003 = $2.4 million/year• Actual Funding 2003 thru 2007 = $1.9 million/year* (average)• Measured cracking percentage in 2007 = 5.5%• Cracking % After 2008 Paving Programme = 5.0%
*31 km out of the total 328 km of Major roads were re-surfaced between the 2003 survey and the 2007 survey
![Page 12: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Comparison to Other Agencies
How does this compare to elsewhere in terms of Cracking ??
Using the same data collection / interpretationBritish Columbia (major roads only) Km Maple Ridge (2007) 8.8 %
154Abbotsford (2003) 7.8 %
304Coquitlam (2007) 5.7 %
119Surrey (2007) 5.6 %
490Township (2008) 5.0 %
328Township (2003) 4.7 %
328New Westminster (2006) 4.6 %
28Richmond (2004) 3.7 %
98Delta (2006) 2.4 %
113
![Page 13: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on MRN Roads 2005
0 – 1% (V Good) = 43 km1 – 5% (Good) = 14 km5 – 10% (Fair) = 2 km10 – 30% (Poor) = 0 km
Avg. Cracking = 1.0%
30 – 100% (V Poor) = 0 km
![Page 14: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Local Roads - 2008
0 – 1% (V Good) = 156 km1 – 5% (Good) = 125 km5 – 10% (Fair) = 38 km10 – 30% (Poor) = 72 km
Avg. Cracking = 8.8% *
30 – 100% (V Poor) = 35 kmTotal = 426 km
* Predicted condition in 2008
based on 2005/06 data
![Page 15: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
13 Years10 Years 20 Years
Analysis Inputs
Example Pavement Strategies (combinations of treatments)
![Page 16: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Analysis Inputs
Using Life Cycle Cost Analysis Evaluated Several Strategies for Each Pavement Segment
• Strategy is comprised of combinations of individual treatments and treatment application timings
• For a given pavement there are hundreds potential preservation strategies.
![Page 17: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Major Roads Patching & Potholing Costs
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,0002
00
8
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
Year
An
nu
al M
ain
ten
an
ce
Co
sts
$1.5 million
$2.0 million
$3.0 million
$3.5 million
$4.0 million
Analysis Results – Major Roads Deterioration
9%
16%
4%
6%
20%
Cracking (ACA) %
$2.0mill
$3.0 mill
$3.5 mill
$4.0 mill
$1.5 mill
Recommended
Recommended
Actual Spending on annual maintenance for major roads is @ $250,000/ year
Pre
dic
ted
![Page 18: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Local Roads Patching & Potholing Costs
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,0002
00
8
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
Year
An
nu
al M
ain
ten
an
ce
Co
sts
$2.5 million
$3.0 million
$ 3.5 million
$ 4.0 million
Analysis Results – Local Roads Deterioration
4%
11%
15%
Cracking (ACA) %
$3.0 mill
$3.5 mill
$4.0 mill
$2.5 mill
Recommended
Recommended
7%
Actual spending on annual maintenance for local roads is
@ $250,000/ year versus required $500,000/ year shown
Pre
dic
ted
![Page 19: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads
2009 - 2025
Predicted condition in 2009 - 2025
Major: $2.0 million/ year
Local: $2.0 million/ year
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 20: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2009
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 5.0 %
= Local 8.8 %
* Predicted condition in 2009
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 21: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2010
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 5.0 %
= Local 9.3 %
* Predicted condition in 2010
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 22: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2011
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 5.2 %
= Local 9.7 %
* Predicted condition in 2011
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 23: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2012
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 5.5 %
= Local 10.2 %
* Predicted condition in 2012
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 24: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2013
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 5.7 %
= Local 10.6 %
* Predicted condition in 2013
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 25: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2014
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 6.0 %
= Local 11.1 %
* Predicted condition in 2014
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 26: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2015
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 6.5 %
= Local 11.6 %
* Predicted condition in 2015
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 27: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2016
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 7.0 %
= Local 12.0 %
* Predicted condition in 2016
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 28: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2017
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 7.6 %
= Local 12.7 %
* Predicted condition in 2017
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 29: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2018
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 8.2 %
= Local 13.4 %
* Predicted condition in 2018
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 30: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2019
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 8.9 %
= Local 14.0 %
* Predicted condition in 2019
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 31: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2020
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 9.6 %
= Local 14.9 %
* Predicted condition in 2020
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 32: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2021
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 10.3 %
= Local 15.8 %
* Predicted condition in 2021
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 33: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2022
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 11.0 %
= Local 16.7 %
* Predicted condition in 2022
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 34: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2023
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 11.8 %
= Local 17.4 %
* Predicted condition in 2023
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 35: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2024
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 12.7 %
= Local 18.1 %
* Predicted condition in 2024
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 36: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2025
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 13.7 %
= Local 19.1 %
* Predicted condition in 2025
Annual Spending: $4.0 million/ year
![Page 37: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads2025
Predicted condition in 2025
Major & Local: $500,000/ year
Annual Spending (Do Minimum) :
![Page 38: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Cracking (ACA) on Major & Local Roads - 2025
0 – 1% (V Good)1 – 5% (Good)5 – 10% (Fair)10 – 30% (Poor)30 – 100% (V Poor)
*Avg. Cracking = Major 26.3%
= Local 30.2%
* Predicted condition in 15 years
Annual Spending: $500,000/ year
![Page 39: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Pavement Asset Value
Pavement Type Replacement 2008 Value 2018 Value (Recommended Budget)
MRN Roads $ 74 million $ 66 million $ 66 million (at $1.3 million/ Year) Major Roads $151 million $136 million $133 million (at $4.0 million/ Year) Local Roads $110 million $ 85 million $ 85 million (at $4.0 million/ Year)
$335 million $287 million $284 million •Recommended MRN Road Funding : 1.8% of Asset Value
•Recommended Major Road Funding : 2.7% of Asset Value
•Recommended Local Road Funding : 3.6% of Asset Value
Roads in good condition can be managed for between 2% and 2.5% of asset value
The local road funding could be reduced to $2.8 million/year once cracking is reduced to 4%
![Page 40: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
For Discussion
![Page 42: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Original GroundOriginal Ground
Excavation and CompactionExcavation and Compaction
Calculating Pavement Value
SubbaseSubbaseBaseBase
AsphaltAsphalt
Pavement value =Pavement value =
Cost of Excavation and Compaction +Cost of Excavation and Compaction +
cost of Subbase + cost of Base + cost of Asphaltcost of Subbase + cost of Base + cost of Asphalt
![Page 43: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
With time and traffic, pavement layers deteriorate
FailureFailureRuttingRutting
CrackingCracking
![Page 44: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Calculating current pavement asset value
crackingcracking New AsphaltNew Asphalt
Original Pavement value Original Pavement value minus the cost in the cost in any given year to restore the pavement to as any given year to restore the pavement to as new conditionnew condition
![Page 45: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Pavement Asset Value
Pavement Type Length Replacement 2008 Value• MRN Roads 59 km $ 74 million $ 66 million• Major Roads 328 km $151 million $136 million• Local Roads 426 km $110 million $ 85 million
813 km $335 million $287 million
![Page 46: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Distress Prediction Modeling
World Bank Pavement Performance - Distress Prediction Modeling
•StructureStructure
•AgeAge
•TrafficTraffic
•EnvironmentEnvironment
•ConditionCondition
Crack Crack InitiationInitiation
Rutting Rutting
Crack Crack ProgressionProgression
RoughnessRoughness
Pot HolesPot Holes
RavelingRaveling
![Page 47: Pavement Management System Presentation to Township of Langley Council, June 22, 2009](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062703/555450f2b4c905b2428b4fcd/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Analysis Inputs
Maintenance / Rehabilitation Treatments and Costs UsedTreatment Unit Cost• Crack Sealing $ 2.25/L-m• Skim Patching $14.00/m2
• Surface Treatment $ 8.00/m2
• Overlay (50 mm) $15.00/m2
• Grind and Patch (40 mm) $22.00/m2
• Grind and Patch (75 mm) $27.00/m2
• Mill/ Inlay (50 mm) $20.00/m2
• Reclaim $40.00/m2
• Reconstruction $60.00/m2
• Subsequent Rehabilitations $15.00/m2 (no curb)$20.00/m2 (with curb)