Paul Moeyaert

13
Lloyd’s Register EMEA Key contribution of Oceanographic research in providing an economic solution to Zeebrugge’s lack of hinterland connectivity Paul Moeyaert

description

Key contribution of Oceanographic research in providing an economic solution to Zeebrugge’s lack of hinterland connectivity. Paul Moeyaert. Wave measurement. Solutions:. Noorderkanaal Dockships “extended” estuair regime. Access to the network of inland waterways from Zeebrugge:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Paul Moeyaert

Page 1: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Key contribution of Oceanographic research in providing an economic solution to Zeebrugge’s lack of hinterland connectivity

Paul Moeyaert

Page 2: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Wave measurement

Page 3: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Solutions:

• Noorderkanaal

• Dockships

• “extended” estuair regime

Page 4: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Access to the network of inland waterways from Zeebrugge:• Traditional inlandwater tankers

Provided “good’ weather

• CoastersBut too high requirementsAnd high investment/operational

costs

Due to lack of reliable knowledge of the risk-level

Page 5: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Page 6: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Extended Estuair

• Based on Risk analyses

• Simulation of ships motions and behaviour as a response to the 10years wave spectra: in the particular sea area

Page 7: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Statistical distribution of occurances of dangerous situations

• Slamming

• Greenseas

• Rolling

• Bending moment

Page 8: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Acceptable frequency

• Bending moment : once a life time

• Slamming: once per year

• Green seas : once per life time

Page 9: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Iterative process of designIf the number of incidents proves to be too

high : 2 possible actions:

•Restrict the allowable weather conditions

And/or

•Increase strength

Optimum solution

Page 10: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Relative vertical motion of point : fore, keel exceeding draft fore: number of exceedings per trajectory as a function of significant wave height in measured directional wave spectra Bol van Heist, Western Scheldt – Zeebrugge

1.0E-06

1.0E-05

1.0E-04

1.0E-03

1.0E-02

1.0E-01

1.0E+00

1.0E+01

1.0E+020 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

significant wave height (m)

num

ber o

f exc

eeda

nces

per

traj

ecto

ry (-

)

conditional minimumconditional maximumconditional averagecumulative average

SCHELDT-ZEEBRUGGE-SCHELDT

CARCARRIER - DRAFT 2.5 mMOTION POINTS 7-9 - SLAMMING

REF LEVEL KEEL

DIRECTIONAL SPECTRA BOL VAN HEIST 1998

Page 11: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Significant Wave Height

• Is a far more accurate criterion for reflecting the risks compared to the old yardstick : Beaufort Number

• As basis for designing ships

• But also as a criterium for the captain: whether to make the voyage or the wait for better circumstances

Page 12: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

Further possible improvements

• Accuracy of predictions on medium term

• Directional predictions

• Distinction between:Swell

– Caused by remote storms – Long waves, traveling at known speed– well predictable

Local waves– Same predictability like the local wind– Shortcrested waves

Page 13: Paul Moeyaert

Lloyd’s Register EMEA

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3wave frequency (rad/s)

side

ver

tical

am

plitu

de d

ue to

roll

/ wav

e am

plitu

de

(m/m

)

0 10 20

30 40 50

60 70 80

90 100 110

120 130 140

150 160 170

180

angle of incidence (deg)CARCARRIERDRAFT 2.50 m