Past Crisis Experiences and its Lessons for Asia
description
Transcript of Past Crisis Experiences and its Lessons for Asia
Past Crisis Experiences and its Lessons for Asia
Pierre L. SiklosViessmann Centre & BSIA
The Backdrop I
• The Asian crisis of 1997-98 continues to leave its mark– Most noticeable in the rise of foreign exchange
reserves– …but impact outside Asia-Pacific region limited
0
2
4
6
8
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Australia
0
10
20
30
40
50
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
China
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Hong Kong
0
10
20
30
40
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Indonesia
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
India
0
5
10
15
20
25
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Japan
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Korea
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Malaysia
0
4
8
12
16
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
New Zealand
0
5
10
15
20
25
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Philippines
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Singapore
0
10
20
30
40
50
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Thailand
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
Australia
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
China
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
H ong Kong
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Indonesia H -P filtered
Indonesia
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
India H -P filtered
India
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
Japan
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving avrage H -P filtered
Korea
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
Malaysia
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
N ew Zealand
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
Philippines
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
Singapore
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Moving average H -P filtered
Thailand
The Backdrop II
• Financial crises in the US and the € area continue to this day 5 years after it first appeared in the US, 2 years after it erupted in Europe. – Its impact has been global– Raised the question of coupling/de-coupling of business
cycles
Region 1980-2010 ‘Crises’ Years
ASEAN 5.16 (3.12) 2.50 (5.61)
CEE 2.61 (3.09) 2.80 (3.31)
China 10.03 (2.81) 10.07 (2.19)
EU 1.97 (1.58) 1.21 (2.76)
Japan 2.22 (2.51) -0.29 (3.11)
LA 2.86 (2.35) 3.60 (2.91)
ME 3.44 (1.35) 4.15 (1.32)
NIC 6.23 (3.17) 2.96 (4.17)
USA 2.68 (2.04) 1.79 (2.73)
1997-982009-10
Real GDP Growth
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2000 2003 2006 2009 2010
Plot of conditional correlations
USA,ASEAN USA,CEE USA,CHN USA,EUUSA,JAP USA,LA USA,ME USA,NIC
vis-a-vis US
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
2000 2003 2006 2009 2010
Plot of conditional correlations
CHN,ASEAN CHN,CEE EU,CHN JAP,CHNLA,CHN ME,CHN NIC,CHN
vis-a-vis China
Implications
• #1– Most crises are regional, only a very few are global– Consequence? Policy responses will be different
• In Asia, focus has been on protection from ‘foreign’ shocks• In the GFC, focus is on regulation, supervision of financial markets,
the role of central banks, and fiscal policy’s impact
Implications
• # 2– Improvements in the ‘delivery’ of monetary policy
(viz., central bank transparency) did not prevent the crisis, or spillovers around the world, and is therefore insufficient although these improvements exaggerated
• IT economies fare much better
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_AUS
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_CHN
0
3
6
9
12
15
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_HKG
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_IND
0
3
6
9
12
15
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_IDA
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_JAP
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_KOR
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_MAL
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_NZD
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_PHI
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_SIN
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
TI_THA
CENTRAL BANK TRANSPARENCY
Implications
• # 3– Common currency ideal in Asia-Pacific very much
on the back burner. Unlikely to be taken seriously or contemplated in the near future
Lessons for Asia?
• # 1: GFC is yet another failure of international financial institutions (viz., IMF)– This time its not the advice, it’s the capacity ,
inaction, and inability to apply ‘moral suasion’
Lessons for Asia?
• # 2: International policy coordination might help but cannot be left to existing institutions– It needs champion(s). Are there any in Asia?
Lessons for Asia?
• # 3: Exchange rate regimes should not be managed (whenever possible)– Creates distortions, complicates necessary policy
coordination, delays necessary policy responses, not to mention political problems
Lessons for Asia?
• Transparency is a necessary but NOT sufficient conditions in managing crises– There is room for improvement– Sequencing of responses needs to be thought
through (e.g., Europe since 2010)– Otherwise, transparency actually can make a bad
situation worse