Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

19
Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate? Bronwyn Barry, Assoc.AIA Certified Passive House Consultant Director, One Sky Homes COPYRIGHT ONE SKY HOMES 2013

description

A close look at two recent California Passive House projects, one new, one retrofit. Which details matter in high performance new and retrofit construction and how we can use this information to build NZE and near-zero energy homes in California.

Transcript of Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Page 1: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Passive House in California:Overkill or Appropriate?

Bronwyn Barry, Assoc.AIA

Certified Passive House ConsultantDirector, One Sky Homes

COPYRIGHT ONE SKY HOMES 2013

Page 2: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Agenda:T-24 Comparisons

Assemblies that workWhat really matters?

Glazing over the details

Page 3: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Nominal vs Actual

24’-0” wall = 288” (100%)2x6 @ 16” o.c. (18) = 27” ( 10%)Batt Insulation = 261” ( 90%)

  Nominal Actual

  R-Value/inch Whole Wall 85/15% 75/25%Studs 1.3 7.0 1.1 1.8Batts 3.5 19.3 16.4 14.4Total Wall     17.4 16.2

Page 4: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Sunnyvale Retrofit

Windows Walls Roof Floor Total0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Typical T-24 Project R-value (hr.ft2F/BTU.in)

PH Project R-value (hr.ft2F/BTU.in)

Windows: AlpenWalls: 2x4, cellulose w/ 2” PolyisoRoof: 6” PolyisoFloor: 4” Polyiso

Page 5: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Sunnyvale Retrofit Assembly Details

FOUNDATION & BARGE RAFTER

ROOF: R-40

WALLS: R- 23

WINDOWS: R-5

FLOOR: R-40

COPYRIGHT ONE SKY HOMES 2013

Page 6: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The SIPS New Build

Windows Walls Roof Floor Total0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Typical T-24 Project R-value (hr.ft2°F/BTU.in)

PH Project R-value (hr.ft2°F/BTU.in)

Windows: EnerSignWalls: 8” SIPSRoof: 10” SIPSFloor: Slab with 2”EPS

Page 7: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Stick Frame Net Zero

Windows Walls Roof Floor Total0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Typical T-24 Project R-value (hr.ft2F/BTU.in)

PH Project R-value (hr.ft2F/BTU.in)

Windows: Alpen + SorpetalerWalls: 2x6, cellulose w/ 1” EPSRoof: 13” Truss, CelluloseFloor: Slab, 4” EPS

Page 8: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Cottle ZEH - Assembly Details

Foundation - R-23 ICF Stem Wall R-15 Slab Floor

Walls – R23

Ceiling - R-50 Loose-fill Cellulose

Page 9: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

1. Super-Insulate2. Avoid Thermal Bridges3. Air Seal ( tight! )4. Windows/Doors – high-performance5. Heat Recovery Ventilation (HRV) in most

Climates6. Solar aware design7. Use PHPP

Passive House Recipe" Buildings heated with hair dryers"

Page 10: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Envelope Results kBTU/ft2.yr heating energy

Preliminary Aug 3, 2009 Max. allowed = 4.75 kBTU/ft2.yr

SIP wall system** Prefab Stud wall Site built

5.5" 7.25" 5.5"5.5" w/ rigid

insul. 7.25"7.25" w/

rigid insul.9.5" TJI studs

Window Est. Cost ($K) 49 52 47 53 49 55 79

Sierra Pacific* 4.52 4.01 5.11 4.58 4.54 4.19 3.91

37 86 89 84 90 86 92 116

**assuming $4k for interior furring

using Recoup 200DX HRV w/ 3' OA duct runs

4" EPS under slab

11-7/8" TJI roof

4" EPS slab edge

Challenging walls

Source: Performance analysis from Dan Johnson, Arkin Tilt Architects and cost estimates from Quantum Builders

A dozen ways to build a wall

Page 11: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Floor to floor assembly with open web hanging floor truss

Complicated junctionsHundreds of ways to mess them up!

Page 12: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Which details really matter?

Air-sealing?Insulation?

Ventilation?Thermal Bridges?

orWindows?

SILL & JAMB (CASEMENT)

Page 13: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Sunnyvale Losses

Exterior Walls21%

Roof17%

Floors21%

Windows30%

Exterior Door2%

Ventilation9%

Total Heat Losses = 15,170 kBTU/yr

Windows: AlpenWalls: 2x4, cellulose w/ 2” PolyisoRoof: 6” PolyisoFloor: 4” Polyiso

Page 14: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Sunnyvale Gains

Windows: AlpenWalls: 2x4, cellulose w/ 2” PolyisoRoof: 6” PolyisoFloor: 4” Polyiso

Windows (So-lar gains)

50%

Internal Heat Gains50%

Total Heat Gains = 7,748 kBTU/yr

Losses66%

Gains34%

Annual Heat Demand = 7,556 kBTU/yr

= 4.85 kBTU/sf.yr

Page 15: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Cottle Losses

Exterior Walls31%

Roof9%

Floors12%

Fndn Stem wall1%

Attached Garage7%

Windows26%

Ventilation13%

Total Heat Losses = 28,986 kBTU/yr

Windows: Alpen + SorpetalerWalls: 2x6, cellulose w/ 1” EPSRoof: 13” Truss, CelluloseFloor: Slab, 4” EPS

Page 16: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

The Cottle Gains

Windows: Alpen + SorpetalerWalls: 2x6, cellulose w/ 1” EPSRoof: 13” Truss, CelluloseFloor: Slab, 4” EPS

Total Heat Gains = 19,853 kBTU/yr

Windows (Solar gains)

Internal Heat Gains

Losses59%

Gains41%

Annual Heat Demand = 9,133 kBTU/yr

= 3.67 kBTU/sf.yr

Page 17: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Image: Lorna Fear IR images

The Camera Never Lies!

Page 18: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

Upcoming

Wednesday, March 20th

Pacific Energy CenterSan Francisco

www.co2zeroca.org

Page 19: Passive House in California: Overkill or Appropriate?

More from Mark….

Questions?

Thank YouBronwyn Barry

Resources:

www.passivehousecal.orgwww.aphnetwork.orgwww.passivehouse.com