Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

61
Sean M. Theriault The University of Texas [email protected] Political Warriors: The Ugly Side of Party Polarization in Congress

Transcript of Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Page 1: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Sean M. Theriault

The University of Texas

[email protected]

Political Warriors: The Ugly Side of Party

Polarization in Congress

Page 2: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 3: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Party Polarizers

Page 4: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Party Polarizers

and

Partisan Warriors

Page 5: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Party Polarizers

and

Partisan Warriors

Page 6: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

“For some time, I’ve had a growing conviction that Congress is not operating as it should. There is much too much partisanship and not enough progress; too much narrow ideology and not enough practical problem-solving. Even at a time of enormous national challenge, the people's business is not getting done.”

--Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN)

February 2010 -

Page 7: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

“For some time, I’ve had a growing conviction that Congress is not operating as it should. There is much too much partisanship and not enough progress; too much narrow ideology and not enough practical problem-solving. Even at a time of enormous national challenge, the people's business is not getting done.”

--Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN)

February 2010 -

Page 8: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Does too much partisanship =

Page 9: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Does too much partisanship =

not enough progress?

Page 10: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Does too much partisanship =

not enough progress?

Does too much narrow ideology =

not enough practical

problem-solving?

Page 11: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Does too much partisanship =

not enough progress?

Does too much narrow ideology =

not enough practical

problem-solving?

Page 12: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 13: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

or

Page 14: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

or

Party Polarizers

Political Warriors

Page 15: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

or

Party Polarizers

Political Warriors

Party Polarizers

Political Warriors

Page 16: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Political

Warriors

Page 17: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 18: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 19: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 20: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 21: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 22: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 23: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

The Bipartisan Budget Commission

Page 24: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

The Bipartisan Budget Commission

34 Cosponsors – 13 Democrats and 21 Republicans

Page 25: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

The Bipartisan Budget Commission

34 Cosponsors – 13 Democrats and 21 Republicans

On Jan. 19, President Obama endorsed the idea

Page 26: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

The Bipartisan Budget Commission

34 Cosponsors – 13 Democrats and 21 Republicans

On Jan. 19, President Obama endorsed the idea

On Jan. 20, McCain and Inhofe withdrew as cosponsors

Page 27: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

The Bipartisan Budget Commission

34 Cosponsors – 13 Democrats and 21 Republicans

On Jan. 19, President Obama endorsed the idea

On Jan. 20, McCain and Inhofe withdrew as cosponsors

On Jan. 21, Crapo and Brownback withdrew

Page 28: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

The Bipartisan Budget Commission

34 Cosponsors – 13 Democrats and 21 Republicans

On Jan. 19, President Obama endorsed the idea

On Jan. 20, McCain and Inhofe withdrew as cosponsors

On Jan. 21, Crapo and Brownback withdrew

On Jan. 22, Hutchison and Ensign withdrew

Page 29: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

The Bipartisan Budget Commission

34 Cosponsors – 13 Democrats and 21 Republicans

On Jan. 19, President Obama endorsed the idea

On Jan. 20, McCain and Inhofe withdrew as cosponsors

On Jan. 21, Crapo and Brownback withdrew

On Jan. 22, Hutchison and Ensign withdrew

On Jan. 26, the amendment is defeated, 53-46

Page 30: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 31: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate
Page 32: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Secr

et

San

ta

Page 33: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Secr

et

San

ta Went Didn’t

Republicans 22 25

Page 34: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Secr

et

San

ta Went Didn’t

Republicans 22 25

Democrats 40 13

Page 35: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Secr

et

San

ta Went Didn’t

Republicans 22 25

Democrats 40 13

CO

LLIN

S SN

OW

E B

RO

WN

M

UR

KOW

SKI

LUG

AR

K

IRK

A

LEX

AN

DER

H

OEV

EN

CO

CH

RA

N

HAT

CH

B

LUN

T H

UTC

HIS

ON

C

OR

KER

P

OR

TMA

N

JOH

AN

NS

MC

CA

IN

WIC

KER

M

OR

AN

R

OB

ERTS

C

OAT

S B

OO

ZMA

N

GR

ASS

LEY

GR

AH

AM

SH

ELB

Y IS

AK

SON

A

YOTT

E TH

UN

E M

CC

ON

NEL

L C

HA

MB

LISS

K

YL

BU

RR

SE

SSIO

NS

CO

RN

YN

ENZI

B

AR

ASS

O

CR

AP

O

RU

BIO

R

ISC

H

VIT

TER

TO

OM

EY

INH

OFE

EN

SIG

N

JOH

NSO

N

CO

BU

RN

D

EMIN

T LE

E PA

UL

Page 36: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Secr

et

San

ta Went Didn’t

Republicans 22 25

Democrats 40 13

BR

OW

N

MU

RKO

WSK

I LU

GA

R

HO

EVEN

C

OC

HR

AN

HU

TCH

ISO

N

CO

RK

ER

PO

RTM

AN

JO

HA

NN

S

WIC

KER

BO

OZM

AN

G

RA

SSLE

Y

SHEL

BY

SESS

ION

S C

OR

NYN

EN

ZI

BA

RA

SSO

C

RA

PO

R

UB

IO

VIT

TER

LEE

CO

LLIN

S SN

OW

E

KIR

K

ALE

XA

ND

ER

HAT

CH

B

LUN

T

MC

CA

IN

MO

RA

N

RO

BER

TS

CO

ATS

GR

AH

AM

ISA

KSO

N

AYO

TTE

THU

NE

MC

CO

NN

ELL

CH

AM

BLI

SS

KYL

B

UR

R

RIS

CH

TOO

MEY

IN

HO

FE

ENSI

GN

JO

HN

SON

C

OB

UR

N

DEM

INT

PAU

L

Page 37: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Secr

et

San

ta Went Didn’t

Republicans 22 25

Democrats 40 13

Republicans 0.46 0.50

Democrats -0.35 -0.37

Page 38: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

“Reducing health care costs by eliminating payments for fraudulent claims and

prohibiting coverage for abortion drugs and erective dysfunction drugs for rapists and

child molester.”

Amendment by

Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK)

March 2010 -

Page 39: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

“Reducing health care costs by eliminating payments for fraudulent claims and

prohibiting coverage for abortion drugs and erective dysfunction drugs for rapists and

child molester.”

Amendment by

Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK)

March 2010 -

Page 40: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Roll Calls on Amendments Rank Congress Senator Roll Call Votes

1. 111th Tom Coburn (R-OK) 49

2. (Tie) 110th Tom Coburn (R-OK) 34

2. (Tie) 110th Jim DeMint (R-SC) 34

4. 103rd Jesse Helms (R-NC) 33

5. 104th Paul Wellstone (D-MN) 29

6. (Tie) 108th Robert Byrd (D-WV) 28

6. (Tie) 104th Tom Harkin (D-IA) 28

6. (Tie) 103rd John McCain (R-AZ) 28

9. 111th John McCain (R-AZ) 27

10. (Tie) 112th Tom Coburn (R-OK) 25

10. (Tie) 104th Byron Dorgan (D-ND) 25

10. (Tie) 106th Paul Wellstone (D-MN) 25

Page 41: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

A Couple of Cases…

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112

Boxer (D-CA)

Page 42: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

A Couple of Cases…

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112

Boxer (D-CA)

Page 43: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

A Couple of Cases…

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112

Boxer (D-CA)

Page 44: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

A Couple of Cases…

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112

Boxer (D-CA)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112

Kyl (R-AZ)

Page 45: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

A Couple of Cases…

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112

Boxer (D-CA)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112

Kyl (R-AZ)

Page 46: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Roll Calls on Amendments

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

103rd 104th 105th 106th 107th 108th 109th 110th 111th 112th Total

Roll Calls on Amendments

Page 47: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Roll Calls on Amendments

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

103rd 104th 105th 106th 107th 108th 109th 110th 111th 112th Total

Roll Calls on Amendments

Page 48: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Roll Calls on Amendments

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

103rd 104th 105th 106th 107th 108th 109th 110th 111th 112th Total

Page 49: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Putting it All Together...

-0.55 -0.5 -0.45 -0.4 -0.35 -0.3 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15

Democrats in the 109th Congress

Party Polarizers

Page 50: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Putting it All Together...

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

-0.55 -0.5 -0.45 -0.4 -0.35 -0.3 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15

Democrats in the 109th Congress

Party Polarizers

Political Warriors

Page 51: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Putting it All Together...

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Republicans in the 111th Congress

Page 52: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Putting it All Together...

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Republicans in the 111th Congress

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

-0.55 -0.45 -0.35 -0.25 -0.15

Democrats in the 109th Congress

Page 53: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Preliminary Findings

Page 54: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Preliminary Findings

• Warfare is carried about by relatively few warriors

Page 55: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Preliminary Findings

• Warfare is carried about by relatively few warriors

• A good proxy…

Page 56: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Preliminary Findings

• Warfare is carried about by relatively few warriors

• A good proxy…

• but probably not the best

Page 57: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Political Warfare Behavior

Page 58: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Political Warfare Behavior

•Amendment Support

Page 59: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Political Warfare Behavior

•Amendment Support

•Cosponsorship

Page 60: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Political Warfare Behavior

•Amendment Support

•Cosponsorship

•Donating Against Incumbents

Page 61: Party Polarization in the U.S. Senate

Questions?