Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
-
Upload
nor-syahirah-ahmad-shukri -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 1/39
Liability
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 2/39
General Liability for Torts and
Crimes
• Partners may be liable for wrongs committedby their fellow partners quiet independentlyof any contract.
• Thus they may be liable for torts or crimes orthe misapplication of property entrusted toone partner and for breaches of trust.
• These liabilities as follows:-
(i Liability for misapplication of property andbreaches of trust or !duciary duty and
(iiLiability for crimes and other torts.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 3/39
"rongs
• #ection $% of the &ct e'plains the generalrule for liability for torts and crimes:-
"here by any wrongful act or omission of
any partner acting in the ordinary course ofthe business of the !rm or with theauthority of his co-partners loss or in)ury iscaused to any person not being a partner in
the !rm or any penalty is incurred the !rmis liable therefor to the same e'tent as thepartner so acting or omitting to act.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 4/39
• Thus each partner is liable for thewrongful acts or omission of his
fellows partners pro*ided:-(i +ither that they are acting in the
ordinary course of the !rm,s
business or(ii"ith the authority of their co-
partners.
(•)#. $% co*ers not only the ci*il liabilityof the partners in tort and for breach
of equitable duty but also their
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 5/39
• owe*er as the partners are not anentitiy separate from the partners who
constitute it when s.$% of thePartnership &ct $/$ imposes the sameliability or penalty on the !rm asincurred by the partner whose act oromission caused the wrong they aremerely imposing personal liability on thewrongdoer,s co-partner.
• 0f a person sought to ma1e thewrongdoer,s co-partners liable unders.$% it must pro*e that the act oromission complained of either:-
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 6/39
(i 2ccurred in the ordinary course of the!rm,s business or
(ii0f it did not that act was authorised bythem.
(•)& partner,s authority to act arises bymandate either e'press or implied fromthe !rm but the ordinary course ofbusiness of the !rm is a matter of fact.
(•)&s to what is meant by 3ordinary course ofthe business of a !rm4 the e'plainationgi*en by 5ahoney 6.& in the 7ew #outh"ales Court of &peeal case of:-
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 7/39
"al1er * +uropean +lectronics Pty
Ltd (in liq
0n considering whether the act of aperson is done un the ordinarycourse of the business of a !rm of
which he is a member it is ofcourse necessary to determine whatthe business of the !rm is.
#ometimes the business of the !rm isde!ned or described in thepartnership agreement.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 8/39
0n such a case the court must decide asa question of fact whether the act inquestion can be and was done in thecourse of carrying it on.
this may be decided by reference tospeci!c e*idence that an act of the 1ind in
question is apt to be or was done incarrying on such a business.
2r in some cases the court may be in aposition to ta1e notice of the fact that abusiness of the 1ind in question is apt tobe carried on by doing acts of the rele*ant1ind.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 9/39
0n other cases where the business is notde!ned or described in the partnership
agreement it is necessary to decide on thefacts of the case what the business is andwhat acts are apt to be done in carrying it.
The present case is of this latter 1ind.
The parties practiced together asaccountants.
The inference is that their business includedthe acceptance of appointment as recei*er or
recei*er and manager and the doing of actsdone for carry out such an appointment.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 10/39
This is the 1ind of thing which accountants of their1ind are apt to do and it is what in the present
case the habitually did.4
• 0n this case the issue to determine is whetherrecei*ership wor1 was within the ordinary courseof business of the !rm of accountants.
• The recei*er and manager of the companymisappropriated company funds.
• e had been appointed personally and hadmaintained separate recei*ership accounts butwas a partner in a !rm of accountants whoseother principals engaged in insol*ency andta'ation practices and had no signi!cantin*ol*ement with recei*ership.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 11/39
• The court held that the partiespracticed together as accountants.
• The inference is that their businessincluded the acceptances ofappointment as recei*er or recei*er
and manager and the doing of actdone to carry out such anappointment.
• This is the 1ind of thing whichaccountants of their 1ind are apt todo and it is what they habitually did.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 12/39
Poli1inghorne * olland
• &ustralian case
The !rm was held liable for aroldolland,s negligent omission to gi*ecompetent ad*ice to 5issPoli1inghorne on the means ofobtaining accurate information about
the desirability of in*esting in aparticular company.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 13/39
&s a solicitor the gi*ing of !nancial
ad*ice was not within the ordinarycourse of business and he had noauthority to engage in such conduct.
8ut liability arose because a solicitorif requested should either ad*ise aclient how such information can beobtained or underta1en to acquirethe information from competent!nancial analysis.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 14/39
2n the other hand the losses
su9ered by 5iss Poli1inghorne whenrequired to honour a guarantee werenot attributable to the !rm.
olland had ad*ised her to in*est inthe trust company but later
approached her as a companydirector and not as her solicitor toguarantee the o*erdraft of thecompany in which she was ashareholder.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 15/39
amly * ouston
The court established the principlethat e*en where an authorisedtransaction is not in itself wrongful
the partners will be liable if it iscarried out in an unlawful or tortiousmanner.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 16/39
8lyth * ladgate
• & partner was as1ed to ad*ise whether aparticular mortgagte satis!ed the criteriafor in*estment detailed in a trust deed.
• The partner initially recommended againstagainst in*estment but later accepted thatthe mortgage would be satisfactory.
• 0n the course of in*estigation he disco*ered
that all trustees were deceased but at theurging of the settlor arranged for thecon*ersion of trust property into cash.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 17/39
• The funds were held in the !rm,s accountsuntil disbursement after the appointment
of trustees.• The mortgage pro*ed to be an inadequatesecurity.
• &s ad*ising trustees was within the scope
od the partner,s apparent authority the1nowledge of the trust deed which he hadacquired was imputed to the otherpartners and all were liable as constructi*etrustees for permitting trust funds to bepaid out in breach of trust requirements.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 18/39
• owe*er if the partner has noauthority at all to achie*e the endsought then his partners will not be
liable for any tort he may commit insee1ing to achie*e that end.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 19/39
7ational Commercial 8an1ingCorporations of &ustralia Ltd * 8atty
• 2ne of the two partners misappropriatedcheques payble to a company of which he wasa director deposited them in the !rm,saccount withdrew the proceeds and usedthem for his own purpose.
• The !rm,s ban1 was sued for con*ersion ofthe cheques.
• &nd now sought to reco*er its loss from theinnocent partner under s.$% as liability for thefraudulent con*ersion of his fellow partner.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 20/39
• The court decided that in depositing thecheques in the !rm,s account the
fraudulent partner was not acting in theordinary course of business of the !rm.
• <hough the fraudulent partner hadauthority to deposit cheques into the
account these were cheques payable tothe !rm and only in e'ceptional casescheques payable to third parties.
• Thus the fraudulent partner had noapparent authority to pay in the chequessince the ban1 should ha*e been put onnotice that he had no authority.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 21/39
+state ;ealities Ltd *."ignall
• 7ew <ealand igh Court
& partner who does not 1nowinglyassist in a wrongful act and did notrecei*e or deal with it did not *y*irtue od being a partner in the !rmbecome a constructi*e trustee of a
property and is not liable to accountfor his share of any pro!t thepartnership obtained from it.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 22/39
0n this case the court held thatalthough the breach of !duciary
occurred during the course of theordinary business of partnership aparty who though absence did not
1nowingly assist in that breach anddid not recei*e or deal with theproperty concerned with 1nowledge
of that breach did not by *irtue ofhis membership of the partnershipbecome himself a constructi*etrustee of the property was notliable to account for his share of any
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 23/39
Cric1lewood oldings Ltd * C=>uigley ? #ons 7ominees Ltd
0t was held that although > a partner in asolicitor !rm acted dishonestly he was acting inthe ordinary course of the business of the !rmin raising moneys by mortgage through thesolicitor,s nominee company.
&ccordingly all of his partners were liable to the!rst plainti9 for that loss.
0n this case the fraud which the !rst plainti9complained was the action of > in obtaining anauthorised mortgage for the purpose of raisingmoney for himself which he ultimately stole.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 24/39
• > was a director of Croc1lewood aswell as being a shareholder.
• e was howe*er also solicitor forCric1lewood.
• 0t was in the course of business of
solicitors to raise moneys bymortgage through the solicitor,snominee company and to pay thesefund o*er to the mortgagor.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 25/39
7ature of the Liability
• The Partnership &ct $/$ ma1es aclear distinction between the natureof the liability of partners for debts
and obligations on the one hand andfor torts crimes and other wrings onthe other.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 26/39
@ebts and 2bligations
• #. $$ of the Partnership &ct $/$ pro*idesthat:-
+*ery partner in a !rm is liable )ointly with
the other partners for all debts andobligations of the !rm incurred while he is apartnerA and after his death his estate is alsose*erally liable in a due course of
administration for such debts and obligationsso far as they remain unsatis!ed but sub)ectto the prior payment of his separate debts.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 27/39
• #. $$ pro*ides that e*ery partner isliable )ointly with the other partners
for all debts and obligations of the!rm incurred while he is a partner.
• This in e9ect creates the unlimited
liability of a partner.• #.$$ deals only with debts and
obligations of a contractual nature
the liability of partners for torts andother wrongs is )oint and se*eral aspro*ided by s.$B of the Partnership&ct $/$.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 28/39
• "hat is )oint liability
• 0n a )oint liability if an action is
brought against one or some only ofthe persons liable and )udgment isentered no further action can be
brought against other persons whowere )ointly liable e*en if the
)udgment remains unsatis!ed.
• 2n the death of a person )ointly liableno liability passes to the estate: thewhole liability to meet the )udgmentis in*ested in the sur*i*ing )udgment
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 29/39
• "hat is se*eral liability
• 0n se*eral liability it recognises an
independent right of action againsteach participant for the full amountof the obligation.
• 0f the )udgment in an action isentered against one or some only ofthe participants and the )udgment isnot fully satis!ed another actionmay be maintained against each ofthe other persons liable until the
)udgment is paid in full.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 30/39
• owe*er the statutory pro*isions does notestablish strict liability rule but a rule which
falls between 3)oint4 and 3)oint and se*eral4.• irstly if all the partners are ali*e when theaction is brought a )udgment enteredagainst one or some only of the partners will
preclude an action against the others inrespect of the same action.
• owe*er if one of the partners who was apartner at the time when the debt or
obligation was incurred dies before the writis issued se*eral liability for debt is imposedon the estate.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 31/39
• Therefore if )udgment against thesur*i*ing partners is not fully
satis!ed another action on the debto obligation may be commencedagainst the personal representati*e
of the deceased but a )udgmentcannot be enforced against separateestate until the claims of thedeceased,s personal creditor ha*ebeen fully discharged.
• 0n ascertaining the liability of theestate full credit must be allowed foran thin reco*ered from the
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 32/39
• #.$$ pro*ides that the debt orobligation must ha*e been incurred
while the deceased was a partner.• 0f the liability of the !rm does not
arise until after a partner,s death
the partner,s estate will be free orany liability.
• 2nly the sur*i*ing partners can be
held liable.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 33/39
8agel * 5iller
• & deceased partner,s estate was heldto be not liable under a contract forgoods sold and deli*ered entered
into before his death because thegoods were not deli*ered to the !rmuntil after his death and the price
was not due to be paid until deli*ery.• &l*erstone C.6 e'plained that:
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 34/39
& claim for goods sold and deli*eredis not a debt incurred while the
deceased was a partner for therewas no debt until the deli*ery of thegoods nor was the duty to pay an
obligation while the deceased was apartner and the e'istence of someother obligation in the lifetime of thedeceased is not suDcient to ma1e hisestate liable in respect of anobligation which was not incurred inhis lifetime.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 35/39
;ouse * 8randford 8an1ingCo.
• 0f on the death of a partner the sur*i*ingpartners agree to ta1e o*er the !rm,sliabilities and indemnify the deceased,sestate they become principal debtors and thedeceased partner,s estate is relegated to theposition of guarantor.
• Then if a creditor 1nowing of this agreement
gi*es further time to the sur*i*ing partners forpayment of the debt so as to pre)udice thelate partner,s estate is discharged fromliability.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 36/39
Liability for wrongs )oint and se*eral
• #ection $B of the Partnership &ct $/$pro*ides:-
+*ery partner is liable )ointly with his co-
partners and also se*erally e*erythingfor which the !rm while he is a partnertherein becomes liable under section $%Eliability of !rm for wrongsF or $Emisapplication of money or propertyrecei*ed for or in custody of !rmF.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 37/39
• #. $B pro*ides that for liability unders.$% and $ of the &ct e*ery partner
is liable )ointly with his co-partnersand also se*erally for e*erything forwhich the !rm becomes liable whilsthe is a partner.
• The distinction in the &ct is between )oint liability for contracts and )ointand se*eral liability for torts.
• "hat is the distinction between )ointand )oint and se*eral liability
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 38/39
• The di9erence is that if liability isonly )oint the plainti9 has only one
cause of action against all thepartners in respect of each debt ofcontract.
Hendall * amilton
& creditor sued all the ob*ious
members of a partnership and wasawarded )udgment against them.
e failed to reco*er the debt in full.
8/17/2019 Partner Using Credit for Private Purpose
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/partner-using-credit-for-private-purpose 39/39
e subsequently disco*ered a wealthydormant partner whom he sought to sue forthe balance of the debt.
The ouse of Lords decided that since thedebt was )oint one only by suing theapparent partners the creditor elected to
sue only them and could not commencefresh proceedings against the other partner.
• owe*er no such restriction applies to
liability under s.$B for there the liability isse*eral as well as )oint so that each partnercan be sued in turn or all together until thefull amount 0 reco*ered.