Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

38
Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith

Transcript of Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Page 1: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Partisanship and Group Voting

POLS 4349Dr. Brian William Smith

Page 2: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Office Hours

• When– Today- 11-2– Friday 10-12– And by appointment

• Doyle 226B

Page 3: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Learning Outcomes I

• Evaluate how people develop political opinions and how this impacts their political behavior.

• Evaluate and interpret the importance of partisanship in shaping political opinion and vote choice

• Identify and describe the formal and informal institutions involved in the electoral process

Page 4: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Readings

• Chapter 4: Partisans and Partisan Change (Flanigan)

• Chapter 5: Social Characteristics of Partisans and Independents (Flanigan)

Page 5: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Partisanship

Still the biggest factor in vote choice

Page 6: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

The Evolution of the American Party System

• Comes out of the New Deal

• Focuses on the Role of Government

• Does not try to represent specific social classes

Page 7: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Why American Parties are Unique

• Non Ideological

• Not Issue Based

• Not Class Based

Page 8: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Why Not issue Based?

• Many Issues are Unimportant

• We adopt issues based on partisanship, not the other way around

• The Parties do not take clear positions on many issues.

Page 9: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

The Goal of American Parties

Page 10: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

THE SOCIAL COMPOSITION OF PARTISAN GROUPS

Winning by getting group votes

Page 11: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

About Partisans

• Vote More

• Participate in other forms of politics

• Vote your way

• But who are they?

Page 12: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

For Groups to Matter

• It has to be big

• It has to come out and vote

• It has to be Loyal

Page 13: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Neither Party Can Rely on a single group

• Both Parties are Heterogeneous

• Both Parties Must court independents

• Both parties move around the spectrum to gain votes.

Page 14: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

The Roosevelt/New Deal Coalition

• The Democratic Key To Success- 1932-1964

• This Breaks apart over time

Page 15: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Group Voting Today

• For Most Americans No Single social or economic characteristic is a good predictor of Partisanship or voting (two exceptions)

• The Rise of cross-cutting Factors

Page 16: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.
Page 17: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Religion

• Americans tend to be more religious than other Western nations.

• We belong to churches and go more than other nations

Page 18: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

The Change in Religion as a predictor

• There are many more religious divisions

• There is an increase in seculars/non-religious

• Some Religions are very politically active

Page 19: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Jewish Voters

• The Exception to the Rule

• Share many Republican characteristics, but are Democratic

• More liberal than other groups, except on Israel policy

• Meet all 3 criteria in 2 states

Page 20: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Catholics

• Still Trend Democratic

• The Result of political socialization

• Less homogenous, hence less predictable

Page 21: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Protestants

Evangelical• Tend to be more

Conservative, and more Republican

• More Rural, Poorer, and Southern

• More focused on Social Issues

Main Line• Examples: Episcopalians,

Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterians

• Declining in number, influence and importance

• Difficult to Gauge

Page 22: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

The Religion Gap

Page 23: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

REGIONNot as exciting as it once was

Page 24: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Why Region is important

• It all goes back to Political Socialization

• We get basic economic and social traits based where live

• Region is South vs. Non-South in America

Page 25: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

The Solid South

• A key component of the Roosevelt coalition– 11 states of the Confederacy Provided• 52% of necessary votes for Wilson in 1916• 47% of the necessary votes for victory in 1932• 31% of Kennedy’s vote in 1960• 43.7% for Jimmy Carter in 1976

– Crucial for Opportunity Costs for Democratic Candidates- they could spend time in battleground states

Page 26: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Why Region is not as Important

• Mobility

• Communications

• Irrigation and Air Conditioning

Page 27: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Even the South is Less Distinct

• It is still the most distinct

• Out-Migration of African Americans

• More industrialized

• Influx of Hispanic Voters

Page 28: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

SOCIAL CLASSNot That Important

Page 29: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Why not social class

• The shared belief in equality of opportunity

• We have never had an appreciable socialist movement

• People identify with other groups before class

Page 30: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Measuring Social Class

• We ask people which class they belong to– We are very likely to say middle class

• Within Social classes there are great variations in income

• Our partisanship doesn’t change with rising or lowering class.

Page 31: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Social Class and Partisanship

Republicans• Do better with poor whites in

the South

• Do better with Upper Middle Class voters

• Historically have done better with Middle Class voters

Democrats• Do better with poor and

working class

• Do better with the very wealthiest

• Do better with Union Members

Page 32: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

AGEThere is a Difference

Page 33: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Not as Big a Deal

• Age is not as important as other factors in determining partisanship

• Young voters tend to be less interested in the system

• Young voters tend to be more Democratic

Page 34: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

RACE AND ETHNICITY

Page 35: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

The American Electorate

• Race is more important than class

• African Americans form a political self-conscious group. And Identify with the Democratic Party

Page 36: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

African American Turnout

• This has increased since the 1960’s

• African Americans are heavily Democratic

• Important swing voters in battleground states

Page 37: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.
Page 38: Partisanship and Group Voting POLS 4349 Dr. Brian William Smith.

Hispanic Voters

• The Fastest growing and largest ethnicity

• Increasingly Democratic since 2000

• Key in CO, FL, NM