PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project...

72
Monitoring the implementation of Environment safeguards Ministry of Environment & Forest Western Region, Regional Office, Bhopal MONITORING REPORT PART-1 DATA SHEET 1. Project type : River- Valley/Mining/Industry/Thermal/Nuclear/Other (Specify) Industry 2. Name of the Project M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD. 3. Clearance letter(s) OM No. and date J-11011/4/2005-IA-IIdated 11/08/2005 Location: Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli, Ta. Ankleshwar (a) District (s) BHARUCH (b) State (s) GUJARAT 4. (c)Location Latitude/Longitude 21 0 62’00.02” N Latitude & 73 0 05’00.10” E Longitude 5. Address for correspondence M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD. Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli, Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116, Gujarat (a) Address of the correspondence Project Chief Engineer (with pin Code & telephone/Telex/Fax numbers) Mr. Sunish K. Nair –Director (Chief Engineer) M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD. Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli, Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116, Gujarat Mobile no. 9377687000 (b) Address of the Executive Project Engineer/Manager Mr. Rahul Kumar Manager M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD. Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli, Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116, Gujarat Mobile no. 9426740399 6. Salient Features

Transcript of PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project...

Page 1: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Monitoring the implementation of Environment safeguards

Ministry of Environment & Forest

Western Region, Regional Office, Bhopal

MONITORING REPORT

PART-1

DATA SHEET 1. Project type :

River-

Valley/Mining/Industry/Thermal/Nuclear/Other

(Specify)

Industry

2. Name of the Project M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD.

3. Clearance letter(s) OM No. and date J-11011/4/2005-IA-IIdated 11/08/2005

Location: Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli,

Ta. Ankleshwar

(a) District (s) BHARUCH

(b) State (s) GUJARAT

4.

(c)Location Latitude/Longitude 21062’00.02” N Latitude & 73005’00.10” E

Longitude

5. Address for correspondence M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD.

Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli,

Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116,

Gujarat

(a) Address of the correspondence Project Chief

Engineer (with pin Code &

telephone/Telex/Fax numbers)

Mr. Sunish K. Nair –Director

(Chief Engineer)

M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD.

Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli,

Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116,

Gujarat

Mobile no. 9377687000

(b) Address of the Executive Project

Engineer/Manager

Mr. Rahul Kumar

Manager

M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD.

Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli,

Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116,

Gujarat

Mobile no. 9426740399

6. Salient Features

Page 2: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

(a) Of the Project

(b) Of the EMP

M/s. Gujarat Agrochem PVT LTD is engaged in

manufacturing pesticides intermediate at GIDC

industrial Estate Panoli, is a large scale industry

engaged in manufacturing of pesticides

intermediates since 2000. Panoli is located in

Bharuch District, which is industrial Estate with

respect to Socio-economic and industrial

development. All the necessary infrastructure

facilities for industrial activities (i.e. Storage and

Handling of Materials, Telecommunication,

Transportation, Utilities, Medical, firefighting

etc.) are available within premises itself.

M/s. Gujarat Agrochem PVT LTD, Panoli Utilized

GIDG water as source of water. Company has

full-fledged Effluent Treatment Plant.

Water Environment:

We segregate the effluent in to two steams

(High COD/High TDS) & (Low COD/Low

TDS)

For High COD/High TDS Provided

Neutralization tank, Settling Tank, Equalization

Tank, 7 effect Multi Effect Evaporator (MEE)

(Stand By) and Vertical thin film Dryer (VTFD).

MEE Condensate Transfer to Biological System

for further treatment & MEE Concentrate Feed

To VTFD for Convert to Salt.

For Low COD/Low TDS Provided Collection

tank, Coagulation tank, Primary Settling Tank,

Aeration-1, Sludge Settling Tank-1, Aeration-2,

Sludge Settling Tank-2,Final treated Water

Collection tank,

The Discharge of wastewater after treatment is

sent to CETP (NCTL) Batch wise through NCTL

Discharge Tank 1/2.

Also we provided RO Plant for incase any

problem in Discharge of CETP than we feed the

Treated Water in RO Plant.

RO permeate Use in Cooling tower & Boiler feed.

RO Reject Transfer to High COD/High TDS for

MEE Feed.

Water Environment Monitoring

By In-house Env. Laboratory

By Third Party (Monthly Monitoring)

By On line Monitoring Every 15 min.

Air Environment

Page 3: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Flue gas emission

Air emissions are in the forms of flue gas

emission in boiler, which uses Steam Coal /

furnace oil as fuel. Sufficient height is provided

for effective dispersion of emissions. Bag filter /

Scrubbers, (Cyclone separator) are provided to

control the process emission.

Process Gas Emission :

Two stage Water scrubber for HCL & one stage

Alkali Scrubber for SO2 & CL2 for controlling

Process Gas Emission.

Operation of Recovery Plant: Sodium

Sulphate/ Potassium Chloride/Ammonium

Chloride is recovered from process waste

Operation & Maintenance of APCM Continuously.

Air Environment Monitoring -

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

Stack/ Process Vent Monitoring

On line Monitoring Every 15 min.

Hazardous Waste

There are Nine categories of Hazardous Wastes,

We have Authorization from SPCB for

management of Hazardous Wastes.

Disposal of MEE Salt, ETP Sludge Spent Carbon

to common TSDF (M/s. BEIL, Ankleshwar,)

Disposal of Process Residue for co processing

(M/s. RSPL Panoli,)

Disposal of Process Waste Residue to CHWIF

(M/s. SEPPL- Bhachau, Kutch, GSPL-Palsana,

Surat, )

Green Belt Development continuously …….

7. Breakup of the Project area Total Area: 30000 m2

Green Belt Area: 9281.18 m2

(a) Submergence area : forest non-forest No forest non-forest area has been used.

Unit is located in Notified Industrial Area.

(b) Others Notified industrial estate

8. Breakup of the project affected population with

enumeration of those losing houses/dwelling

units only agricultural land only both dwelling

units & agricultural land & landless

laborers/artisans:

Unit is located in notified industrial area.

GIDC has allotted us this plot.

We do not have such detail.

(a) SC, ST/Adivasi Data is not available

(b) Others -

Page 4: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

(Please indicate whether these figures are based

on any scientific and systematic survey carried

out or only provisional figures, if a survey is

carried out give details & year of survey)

Data is not available

9. Financial Details

(a) Project cost as originally planned and

subsequent revised estimates and the year of

price reference

Project completed in the year 2006 vide EC no.

J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at

that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year

2005.

Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06)

(b) Allocation made for EMP with item wise and

year wise break-up

Detail is attached as per Annexure-A

(c) BC ratio/IRR and the year of assessment 0.60

Assessment Financial Year: 2016-2017

(d) Whether © includes the cost of EM as shown

in the above

yes

(e) Actual expenditure incurred on the project

so far

Rs. 36 Crore (Year: 2016-2017)

(f) Actual expenditure incurred on the EMP so

far

Total Rs.102.3 Crore (Year: 2016-2017)

10. Forest land requirement Not applicable as unit is located in notified

industrial estate

(a) The status of approval for diversion of forest

land for non-forestry use Not applicable

(b) The status of clearing felling Not applicable

© The status of CA, if any Not applicable

(d) comments on the viability & sustainability of

CA program in the light of actual field

experience so far

Not applicable

11. The status of clear felling in non-forest areas

(such as submergence area or reservoir,

approach Rods.), if any with quantitative

information required.

Not applicable

12. Status of construction (Actual &/or Planned) Existing Unit

(a) Date of commencement (Actual &/or

Planned) 28th FEB-2005

(b) Date of completion (Actual &/or Planned) 31st March-2006

13. Reason for delay if the project is yet to start. Not applicable

14. Date of Visit Site

a) Date on which the project was

monitored by the MOEF&CC, RO

Bhopal on previous occasion ( if any)

b) Date of the site visit for the present

monitoring report ( if Undertaken)

10.01.2007

20.07.2017

Page 5: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

15. Details of Correspondence with project authorities for obtaining act on

plants/information on status of compliance to safeguards other than the routine letters

for logistic support for site visits. (the first monitoring report may contain the details of

all the letters issued so far, but the later report may cover only the letter issued

subsequently)

Date: Letter from RO Date: Letter from PA

20.07.2017: During the site visit, the PAs

have been directed to submit a revised

comprehensive compliance report with

documentary evidences.

30.08.2017 final revised comprehensive

CR received vide letter dated 16.08.2017

Annexure-A

Year wise Allocation made for EMP

Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost

Water Environment

ETP: 10.0 Crore 0.50 Crore

Air Environment

APCM 15.50 Crore 0.50 Crore

Haz Waste Rule

Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.50 Crore

0.20 Crore

2010-11

Green Belt Development: 1.0 Crore 0.30 Crore

Total = 27 Crore Total =1.5 Crore

Year wise Allocation made for EMP

Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost

Water Environment

ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 15.0 Crore 1.2 Crore

Air Environment

APCM 0.20 Crore 0.55 Crore

Haz Waste Rule

Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.00 Crore

0.50 Crore

2011-12

Green Belt Development: 0.05 Crore 0.35 Crore

Total = 15.25 Crore Total =2.6 Crore

Year wise Allocation made for EMP

Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost

Water Environment

ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore

Air Environment

APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore

Haz Waste Rule

Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore

4.90 Crore

2012-13

Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore

Total = 1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore

Page 6: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Year wise Allocation made for EMP

Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost

Water Environment

ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore

Air Environment

APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore

Haz Waste Rule

Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore

4.90 Crore

2013-14

Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore

Total =1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore

Year wise Allocation made for EMP

Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost

Water Environment

ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore

Air Environment

APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore

Haz Waste Rule

Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore

4.90 Crore

2014-15

Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore

Total =1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore

Year wise Allocation made for EMP

Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost

Water Environment

ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore

Air Environment

APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore

Haz Waste Rule

Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore

4.90 Crore

2015-16

Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore

Total =1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore

Year wise Allocation made for EMP

Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost

Water Environment

ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore

Air Environment

APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore

Haz Waste Rule

Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore

4.90 Crore

2016-17

Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore

Total =1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore

Page 7: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Annexure–2

Compliance Report of SCN/DIR notice issued by the

CPCB/GPCB

Sr

No

SCN/DIR

Date

SCN/DIR notice Query SCN/DIR REPLY

1. B-

29016/04

/06/PCI-

I/5179

dated

22nd July

received

on 13th

Aug

Directions under Section

– 5 of environment

protection Act, for

installation of online

effluent and emission

monitoring system.

We received a letter from GPCB for installation of the

environment monitoring system on 27th March 2015, on

receipts of the same we initiated the purchase of the

required equipment’s for online monitoring. The

procurements details like purchase order copies of the said

instruments where submitted to the GPCB on the 14th April

2015. Copy of the letter and PO attached for your kind

perusal.

Further to this we wish to state that the management of

GUJARAT AGROCHEM LTD is serious in implementing all the

necessary systems as per the directives of CPCB. The major

equipment’s of Online monitoring system are imported and

are long delivery item and hence the delay in installation.

Please find below the current status of implementation of

the online effluent and emission monitoring systems.

Sr.

No

Descr

iption

Status Remarks Present

Status

1 On

line

pH

meter

Receive

d /

installed

2 Online

TSS

Analyz

er

Receive

d/install

ed

3 Online

TOC

meter:

Shima

dzu

Make

Shipped

from on

31st

July.

Will

received

at Site

on 25th

of Aug.

4 Online

Stack

Analyz

er

Shima

dzu

Make

Will be

received

by first

week of

Septem

ber

The data

uploading on

GPCB XGN site

will be started

Once the TOC

meter is

installed since

the SOFTWARE

for uploading is

common for all

the installation.

The online 24X7

monitoring

systems will be

commissioned

by 30th Aug. for

items 1, 2, and

3. Stack

Analyzer will be

commissioned /

uploaded online

by 15th of

September

It is

commission

ed and

installed.

Page 8: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

receipts of Online pH meter and TSS analyzer, the shipment

details of TOC meter of Shimadzu and Stack Gas Analyzer.

Sr.

No

Description Remarks Present

Status

1 On line pH meter Tax Invoice

Copy of Vendor

/ and Goods

receipt Note

It is

commissio

ned and

installed.

2 Online TSS

Analyzer

Tax Invoice

Copy of Vendor/

and Goods

receipt Note

It is

commissio

ned and

installed.

3 Online TOC

meter: Shimadzu

Make

Performa

Invoice of

Shimadzu and

Shipment details

- Bill of lading

It is

commissio

ned and

installed.

4 Online Stack

Analyzer:

Shimadzu Make

Performa

Invoice and LC

details in the

name of the

Supplier.

It is

commissio

ned and

installed.

We Assure the Board we will comply with the installation

and commissioning of the 24x7 online monitoring systems

by the 30th Aug 2015.

In view of the above we request you to view our case

sympathetically and request not issue a closure. Further to

this we will ensure the commissioning and installation

certificate of the Systems will mailed and to your good

office immediately on installation of the same.

(Please find Annexure –B)(Attached in hard copy)

The Production was on in

the Unit

Sir, the production was on but on reduced capacity, it’s a

continuous plant which cannot be shut down immediately as

it might result in accidents.

Heavy fugitive emission

was observed

Sir, there was a momentary fluctuations of power failure

which resulted in the tripping of scrubber pump, giving rise

to fugitive emission. This was controlled with immediate

effect by restarting of the scrubber pumps.

2. GPCB/CC

A-

110(8)/ID

-

15129/32

8879 Dtd.

01.10.201

5

Alkaline contaminated

waste water was

accumulated in the

premises along with

monsoon water which

was drained to GIDC

drain going to Vand

Khadi.

Sir, we have provided peripheral storm drain around our

operational area. The storm drain is not connected to the

outside GIDC open drain.

We have installed a pump which pumps the water collected

in the storm drain back to ETP.

On the day of visit there was heavy rainfall, water had

logged on the entire road because of all the water from the

catchment areas, coming down & getting accumulated. The

pump which we have installed was under operation &

Page 9: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

pumping back the entire water but since the rainfall was

heavy, created a flood like situation & water flowing from all

the catchment area, the capacity of pump was inadequate.

The catchment area water rain off from floor was

overflowing and going to the outside drain through the main

gate.

The storm water drain

was found Alkaline which

mixed with monsoon

water and was going out

a main gate

There was breach in the dyke wall of the C.S. Lye storage

tanks from

where the accumulated rainwater flowed in rendering the

PH alkaline

to the floor water runoff.

The highly alkaline water

sample drawn of

Brownish colour of which

Ph-11.57, COD:1349,

NH3N-91.8 observed

Sir, we wish to state that we did not discharge any effluents

to the storm drain nor to the outside common GIDC drain.

It was a situations which we did try our best to control and

not let out any floor runoff’s to outside drain but was not

completely successful. As soon as the rain subdued the

situation was brought under complete control.

Sir we reiterate we have full-fledged EMS System to take

care of our Pollution loads and we ensure the entire System

in fully operational and abide by the boards directives.

(Please find Annexure –C)(Attached in hard copy)

It was found that so

much quantity of fugitive

emission from the plant

was mixing in

atmosphere and

experienced

inflammation in eyes and

throat also. During

investigation regarding

this it is come to

knowledge that Unit’s

APCM was not working

efficiently.

We are operating the Bromine recovery and scrubber

system as effectively. The operator had gone to have his

evening tea and left the scrubber unattended hence the pH

had turned acidic around 4-5 momentarily resulting in

emission , which was immediately controlled by charging

Caustic Lye to the Scrubber from tank kept in the recovery

plant. The plant was restarted only after the off gases

where controlled. We will ensure that better administrative

controls.

Bromine Recovery plant

was seems to be very

weak and unsafe by

looking at glance during

today’s visit of your unit.

The bromine recovery plant is constructed of RCC, the

truss’s and other MS structural is to be yet to be painted

hence looks shabby. This will be taken up on priority. We

will ensure that better housekeeping too is improved.

Acidic was found from

Alkali scrubber on media

P.H Strip in bromination

Plant which shows that

gas occurred from

recovery is directly mix

in atmosphere.

Above unexpected incident mentioned in point no.1 disturb

pH of our scrubber system.

3. GPCB/CC

A-

110(9)/ID

-

15129/36

0575 Dtd.

24.06.201

6

Foul smell experienced

from high COD Collection

The Foul smell might be of Toilet block which is located near

the High COD collection premises.

Page 10: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Tank:

ETP Plant Primary

clarifier was found

inactive

Primary clarifier is in operation, but since the RPM is on the

lower might have got a feeling that’s it’s not operational.

Ambient Air Quality was

found very poor.

We always taking care and maintain the ambient air quality,

the ambient quality has deviated marginally on that day due

to the fugitive emission for Bromine scrubber.

So much Drums filled

with waste found stored

in open place in the Unit.

The drums are aqueous emulsions separated from the

process, which has be taken back for reprocess in the

plants. The area has been cleared off since then.

(Please find Annexure –D)(Attached in hard copy)

4. SCN-

410836,

29/04/20

17

As ER-1 verified it is

observed that unit has

manufactured

formulation products

(non consented

products) in April 16:

Cypermethrin

formulation – 38.3KL,

Thiamethoxam

formulation – 2.0MT. in

May – 16: Cypermethrin

formulation – 78.5KL,

Alpha Cypermethrin

formulation – 11.0KL,

Hexa Conazole

formulation – 21.0 KL,

Thiamethoxam

formulation – 2.8MT,

Deltamethrin formulation

– 28.0 KL, In June – 16:

Cypermethrin

formulation – 54.16KL,

Alpha Cypermethrin

formulation – 7.0 KL.

We would like to bring to your kind attention the production

data captured in ER – 1 of the formulation product are

meant for trading. These formulation products have been

manufactured by a third party on toll manufacturing basis.

The toll manufacturing has been carried out by formulations

like, Snehal Impex Pvt. Ltd, Baroda Agro Chemicals Limited

and Sulphur Mills Limited etc. who has valid consent from

the board. Job work challans attached for your perusal.

• Presently we applied for CCA ammendment to

GPCB Gandhinagar.

(Please find Annexure –E)(Attached in hard copy)

5. SCN-

410837,

29/04/20

17

Approx. 120 MT

hazardous waste (ETP

Waste + MEE Salt) was

found stored in

hazardous waste storage

area.

Our hazardous waste storage area capacity is 400 MT &

hazardous waste (MEE salt + ETP sludge) generation is 25

to 30 MT/Day. First of all we store (MEE salt + ETP sludge)

at hazardous waste storage area for drying work then sent

to landfill site. This is a standard operating procedure.

Approx. 2800 MT

hazardous waste is

temporally stored in the

unit named M/s. Tagros

As you know that in monsoon season all landfill sites are

closed. So, we are temporally storing MEE Salt at above

unit only during monsoon season. We have permission from

the Board for the same. Since the time of visit by your good

office the storage area has been cleared off & the MEE Salt

Page 11: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Chemicals, Ankleshwar. has been disposed off to landfill site. The storage is empty.

Approx. 100 drums of

semi-processed material

was fond store in open

area within premises.

During the visit of your officer on dtd. 08/12/2016, drums

were in transit from plant to plant for process/in process

inspection. As a part

Of our operation. Generally those drums are cleared on a

same day if not cleared, we store in safe mode.

(Please find Annexure –F)(Attached in hard copy)

Page 12: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Annexure–3

Page 13: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 14: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 15: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 16: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Part-II&III

DESCRIPTIVE REPORT ON STATUS OF COMPLIANCE TO CONDITIONS OF ‘ENVIRONMENTAL

CLEARANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

i) Compliance status of Environmental Clearance issued by MoEF & CC, New Delhi vide letter

No.: J-11011/4/2005-IA II (I) Dt. 11.08.2005

(Details of the project: Pesticide technical products, Gujarat by M/s. Gujarat Agrochem Ltd.)

A. Specific Condition

Sr.

No.

Condition Compliance Status Action taken after visit

1. The gaseous

emissions (SO2, NOx

and HCl) and

particular matters

from Various

process units should

conform to the

standards prescribed

by the concerned

authorities from

time to time.

At no time, the

emission levels

should go beyond

the stipulated

standard.

Company does regular monitoring on monthly

basis by third party i.e. M/s. Vairagya Consultants

(Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no.

GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017) of

gaseous emissions (SO2, NOx and HCl) and

particular matters from Various process units and

the results are found within the prescribed

standards.

Every month analysis the emission level by third

party.

(Please find Annexure –G & H)(Attached in

hard copy)

Month of JAN-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.4 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.6 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.9 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.6 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.34 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.9 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.23 15 Mg/Nm3

19/01/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.16 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of FEB-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.2 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.5 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.0 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3

15/02/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAR-2017

Page 17: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.0 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.1 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.30 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.4 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

21/03/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01 H2S 0.19 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of APR-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.1 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.3 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.3 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3

19/04/

2017

(WATER+CAUST

IC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAY-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.5 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.7 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

17/05/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JUN-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.8 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.1 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.3 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.8 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

07/06/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER

PLANT-01

H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JAN-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.3 150 Mg/Nm3

Page 18: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.9 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.065 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.2 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.31 15 Mg/Nm3

19/01/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.057 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of FEB-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.1 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.8 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.0 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.066 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.29 15 Mg/Nm3

15/02/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.052 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAR-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.4 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.0 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.3 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.3 15 Mg/Nm3

21/03/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.05 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of APR-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.2 15 Mg/Nm3

19/04/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.048 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAY-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.7 150 Mg/Nm3

Page 19: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

In the event of

failure of pollution

control system(s)

adopted by the unit,

the respective unit

should not be

restarted unit

control measures

are rectified to

achieve the desired

efficiency.

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.19 15 Mg/Nm3

ER PLANT-01

H2S 0.047 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JUN-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.8 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.1 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.13 15 Mg/Nm3

07/06/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.049 45 Mg/Nm3

We ensure that in case of any failure of the

pollution control system(s), the operations related

to the equipment’s are stopped, and the stand by

systems are made operational with immediate

effect. The entire system is monitored round the

clock. We have installed a standalone plant for

scrubbing of the Fugitive emissions.

In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. PP may also compare the analysis results with the national emission standards for

pesticide industries notified by MoEFCC vide G.S.R.446 E Dated 13th June, 2011.Needful up- gradation of systems may be undertaken to comply with the said norms. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS as stated above. In future however, monitoring may be carried out through NABL accredited Consultants.

Sir, We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/ Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.

2. Ambient Air Quality

Monitoring Stations

Should be set up in

the down wind

direction as well as

where maximum

ground level

concentration of

SPM are anticipated

in consultation with

the state pollution

control board.

We have selected ambient air monitoring station in

consultation with the Gujarat Pollution Control

Board (GPCB) and ensured that at least one

station is installed in the upwind and downwind

direction as well as where maximum ground level

concentrations are anticipated. We have regularly

monitor ambient air quality within the premises

through third party analysis on monthly basis by

M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule –

II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-

294/404708/20 Feb 2017). The report of

ambient air quality monitoring is enclosed

herewith.

(Please find Annexure –I &J)(Attached in hard

copy) (MIN. MAX. tabulated based on the data

Page 20: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

monitoring generation over a period from JAN-2017 to JUN-2017)

Avg. calculated based on the total reading of 6 months)

Location Parame

ter

Result GPCB

Norms MIN Ma

x Avg. Mg/Nm3

PM10 26.3 40 32.55 100

PM2.5 13.1 21 16.12 60

Sox 7.2 8.8 7.92 80

NOx 1.2 4.9 2.45 80

HCL 0.68 0.7 0.69 200

CL2 0.41 0.49

0.44 100

Main Gate

NH3 4.5 7.5 5.87 400

Locatio

n

Paramete

r

Result GPCB

Norms

MIN Max Avg. Mg/Nm3

PM10 26.3 40 32.55 100

PM2.5 13.1 21 16.12 60

Sox 7.2 8.8 7.92 80

NOx 1.2 4.9 2.45 80

HCL 0.68 0.7 0.69 200

CL2 0.41 0.49

0.44 100

Near ETP

NH3 4.5 7.5 5.87 400

Month of JAN-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 26.3 100

PM2.5 13.1 60

Sox 7.2 80

NOx 1.3 80

HCL 0.70 200

CL2 0.41 100

19/01/ 2017

Main Gate

NH3 4.5 400

Month of FEB-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 27 100

PM2.5 14.3 60

Sox 7.6 80

NOx 1.2 80

HCL 0.68 200

CL2 0.42 100

15/02/ 2017

Main Gate

NH3 5 400

Month of MAR-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 30 100

Page 21: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

PM2.5 14.8 60

Sox 7.7 80

NOx 1.4 80

HCL 0.7 200

CL2 0.43 100

21/03/ 2017

Main Gate

NH3 5 400

Month of APR-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 34 100

PM2.5 16.3 60

Sox 7.8 80

NOx 1.6 80

HCL 0.68 200

CL2 0.45 100

19/04/ 2017

Main Gate

NH3 6 400

Month of MAY-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 38 100

PM2.5 17.2 60

Sox 8.4 80

NOx 4.9 80

HCL 0.69 200

CL2 0.43 100

17/05/ 2017

Main Gate

NH3 7.2 400

Month of JUN-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 40 100

PM2.5 21 60

Sox 8.8 80

NOx 4.3 80

HCL 0.7 200

CL2 0.49 100

07/06/ 2017

Main Gate

NH3 7.5 400

Month of JAN-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 24.3 100

PM2.5 12.3 60

Sox 11.2 80

NOx 3.5 80

HCL 2.7 200

CL2 0.69 100

19/01/ 2017

Near ETP

NH3 10.9 400

Month of FEB-2017 Sampling

Date

Locatio

n

Paramet

er

Resul

t

GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 26.1 100

PM2.5 13.2 60

Sox 10.2 80

15/02/ 2017

Near ETP NOx 3.2 80

Page 22: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

HCL 2.3 200

CL2 0.7 100

NH3 10.8 400

Month of MAR-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 28 100

PM2.5 15.3 60

Sox 11 80

NOx 4.3 80

HCL 2.4 200

CL2 0.7 100

21/03/ 2017

Near ETP

NH3 11 400

Month of APR-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 32 100

PM2.5 16.3 60

Sox 11.5 80

NOx 5.3 80

HCL 2.2 200

CL2 0.69 100

19/04/ 2017

Near ETP

NH3 10.5 400

Month of MAY-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 35 100

PM2.5 16.8 60

Sox 11.8 80

NOx 5.2 80

HCL 2.4 200

CL2 0.7 100

17/05/ 2017

Near ETP

NH3 10.9 400

Month of JUN-2017 Sampling

Date Locatio

n Paramet

er Resul

t GPCB Norms

Mg/Nm3

PM10 38 100

PM2.5 19 60

Sox 11.5 80

NOx 5.7 80

HCL 2.3 200

CL2 0.8 100

07/06/ 2017

Near ETP

NH3 11 400

In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. In future however, monitoring may be carried out through NABL accredited Consultants. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

Sir, We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/

Page 23: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.

3. Fugitive emission in

the work zone

environment,

product raw

material storage

area must be

regularly monitored.

We are continue monitoring the product raw

material storage area and Godown area of leakage

or spillage also Every month analysis Fugitive

emission in the work zone environment level by

third party M/s. Vairagya Consultants

(Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB

no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).

(Please find Annexure –K&L)(Attached in hard

copy)

PLANT-01 Date: 09/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017

Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.19

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.57

Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FEB-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.21

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.63

Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.20

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.62

Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017

Page 24: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.21

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.63

Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.22

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.64

Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.23

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.65

PLANT-02 Date: 09/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017

Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.17

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.092

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FEB-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

Page 25: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.13

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.12

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.11

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.09

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.12

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.08

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.13

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.09

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

Page 26: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

The flue gas

emissions should

conform to the

standards prescribed

by the Gujarat

Pollution Control

Board.

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC)

ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.12

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.08

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Every month analysis the flue gas emissions of the

Boiler or DG sets by third party M/s. Vairagya

Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II

auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-

294/404708/20 Feb 2017).

(Please find Annexure –M,N,O,P) (Attached in

hard copy) Month of JAN-2017

Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Param

eter

Resul

t

GPCB Norms

PM 55.8 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 27 100 ppm

19/01/ 2017

BOILER

Coal NOx 11.6 50 ppm

Month of FEB-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Param

eter

Resul

t

GPCB Norms

PM 56.2 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 28 100 ppm

15/02/ 2017

BOILER

Coal NOx 11 50 ppm

Month of MAR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Param

eter

Resul

t

GPCB Norms

PM 55.3 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 27 100 ppm

21/03/ 2017

BOILER

Coal NOx 10.5 50 ppm

Month of APR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Param

eter

Resu

lt

GPCB Norms

PM 57 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 25 100 ppm

19/04/ 2017

BOILER

Coal NOx 11 50 ppm

Month of MAY-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Param

eter

Resu

lt

GPCB Norms

PM 59 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 26 100 ppm

17/05/ 2017

BOILER

Coal NOx 12 50 ppm

Month of JUN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach To

Fuel

used

Parame

ter

Resu

lt

GPCB Norms

PM 58 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 23 100 ppm

07/06/ 2017

BOILER

Coal NOx 11 50 ppm

Month of JAN-2017

Page 27: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 16.2 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.3 100 ppm

19/01/ 2017

DG SET-01

Diesel NOx 2.1 50 ppm

Month of FEB-2017

Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 16 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.1 100 ppm

15/02/ 2017

DG SET-01

Diesel NOx 2.3 50 ppm

Month of MAR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 16.5 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.3 100 ppm

22/03/ 2017

DG SET-01

Diesel NOx 2.4 50 ppm

Month of APR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 17 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.5 100 ppm

20/04/ 2017

DG SET-01

Diesel NOx 2.3 50 ppm

Month of MAY-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach

To

Fuel used

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 18 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.9 100 ppm

17/05/ 2017

DG SET-01

Diesel NOx 2.2 50 ppm

Month of JUN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 17 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12 100 ppm

08/06/

2017

DG

SET-01

Dies

el NOx 2.3 50 ppm

Month of JAN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 14.5 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.2 100 ppm

19/01/2017

DG SET-02

Diesel NOx 2.3 50 ppm

Month of FEB-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Parame

ter

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 14.2 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12 100 ppm

15/02/ 2017

DG SET-02

Diesel NOx 2.8 50 ppm

Page 28: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Month of MAR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 13.2 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.4 100 ppm

22/03/ 2017

DG SET-02

Diesel NOx 2.5 50 ppm

Month of APR-2017

Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 13.4 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.2 100 ppm

20/04/ 2017

DG SET-02

Diesel NOx 2.6 50 ppm

Month of MAY-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 16 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.3 100 ppm

17/05/ 2017

DG SET-02

Diesel NOx 2.7 50 ppm

Month of JUN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramete

r

Resul

t

GPCB

Norms

PM 17 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.2 100 ppm

08/06/ 2017

DG SET-02

Diesel NOx 2.6 50 ppm

Month of JAN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramete

r

Resul

t

GPCB

Norms

PM 18.8 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 14.9 100 ppm

20/01/ 2017

DG SET-03

Diesel NOx 3.0 50 ppm

Month of FEB-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramete

r

Resul

t

GPCB

Norms

PM 18.0 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 15 100 ppm

16/02/ 2017

DG SET-03

Diesel NOx 3.2 50 ppm

Month of MAR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramete

r

Resul

t

GPCB

Norms

PM 14.0 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 13 100 ppm

22/03/ 2017

DG SET-03

Diesel NOx 3.1 50 ppm

Month of APR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramete

r

Resul

t

GPCB

Norms

PM 14.5 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12 100 ppm

20/04/ 2017

DG SET-03

Diesel NOx 3.3 50 ppm

Page 29: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Month of MAY-2017 Sampling

Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramete

r

Resul

t

GPCB

Norms

PM 17.3 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.5 100 ppm

18/05/ 2017

DG SET-03

Diesel NOx 4.3 50 ppm

Month of JUN-2017

Sampling

Date

Stack

Attach

To

Fuel

used

Paramete

r

Resul

t

GPCB

Norms

PM 17.5 150 Mg/Nm3

So2 12.1 100 ppm

08/06/ 2017

DG SET-03

Diesel NOx 4.1 50 ppm

In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. In future however, monitoring may be carried out through NABL accredited Consultants. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

Sir, We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/ Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.

4. The process

emissions shall

be scrubbed

through caustic

scrubber and

conform

standards.

The efficiency

of the scrubber

shall be

maintained as

per the best

practicable

technology.

We have provided Two stage Water scrubber for

HCL & one stage Alkali Scrubber for SO2 & CL2 for

control process emission.

Yes it is monitored on regularly basis for pH and

maintained the efficiency of the scrubber also we

have regular monitoring on monthly basis by third

party i.e. M/s. Vairagya Consultants

(Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB

no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).

(Please find Annexure –G & H) (Attached in

hard copy)

Month of JAN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.4 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.6 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.9 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.6 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.34 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.9 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.23 15 Mg/Nm3

19/01/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.16 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of FEB-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach

To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.2 150 Mg/Nm3

Page 30: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

NOx 2.0 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3

15/02/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01 H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.0 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.1 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.30 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.4 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

21/03/ 2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.19 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of APR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.1 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.3 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.3 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3

19/04/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAY-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.5 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.7 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

17/05/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-

01

H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JUN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.8 150 Mg/Nm3

Page 31: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

HN3 6.8 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

2017 IC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01 H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JAN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.3 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.9 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.065 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.2 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.31 15 Mg/Nm3

19/01/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.057 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of FEB-2017 Sampli

ng

Date

Stack

Attach To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.1 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.8 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.0 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.066 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.29 15 Mg/Nm3

15/02/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.052 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.4 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.0 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.3 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.3 15 Mg/Nm3

21/03/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.05 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of APR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.2 15 Mg/Nm3

19/04/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.048 45 Mg/Nm3

Page 32: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

VOC emissions

shall be

monitored and

data submitted

to the Ministry.

Month of MAY-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.7 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.3 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.5 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.19 15 Mg/Nm3

17/05/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.047 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JUN-2017 Sampling Date

Stack Attach

To

Parameter

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.8 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.1 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.13 15 Mg/Nm3

07/06/2017

(WATER

+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.049 45 Mg/Nm3

We regularly monitor level of VOC for Odour

control. Also we have regular monitoring on

monthly basis by third party i.e. M/s. Vairagya

Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II

auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-

294/404708/20 Feb 2017)

(Please find Annexure –K&L)(Attached in hard

copy)

PLANT-01

Date: 09/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.19

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.57

Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FEB-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.21

Page 33: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.63

Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.20

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.62

Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.21

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.63

Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.22

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.64

Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.23

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.65

PLANT-02

Date: 09/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.17

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.092

Page 34: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FEB-2017 Sr.

No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.13

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.12

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr.

No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.11

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.09

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr.

No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.12

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.08

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr. No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

Page 35: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.13

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.09

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr.

No.

Parameter Unit Result

1 Acetone ppm NIL

2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL

3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL

4 N-Hexane ppm NIL

5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL

6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL

7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL

8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.12

9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.08

10 Acetic acid ppm NIL

In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. In future however, monitoring may be carried out through NABL accredited Consultants. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

Sir, We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/ Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.

5. As reflected in the

EIA/EMP the

Process effluent

generation shall not

exceed 120 m3/d.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

We are not generating more than permissible

limit of Process effluent.

(Please find Annexure –W) (Attached in hard

copy)

GIDC Water 193.76 KL

Process & Washing 74.09 KL

Boiler & Cooling 95.17 KL

Other Use (Gardening etc.) 8.5 KL

Domestic

16 KL

Process & Washing- 72 KL + Boiler & Cooling 19.05 KL= Total Industrial Effluent 91.05 KL

Domestic

14 KL

8.5 KL use in Gardening etc.

Loss 2.09 KL Loss

WATER BALANCE-2014-15

2 KL Loss

Total Effluent 105.05

KL

Page 36: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

GIDC Water 205.83 KL

Process & Washing 78.71 KL

Boiler & Cooling 102.62

KL

Other Use (Gardening etc.) 8.5 KL

Domestic

16 KL

Process & Washing- 76.49 KL + Boiler & Cooling 13.43 KL= Total Industrial

Effluent 89.92 KL

Domestic

14 KL

8.5 KL use in Gardening etc. Loss

2.22 KL Loss

WATER BALANCE-2015-16

2 KL

Loss

We segregate High COD, High TDS and low

COD/TDS effluent streams.(Complied)

We treat High COD effluent in MEE and LOW

COD/TDS in ETP consisting of primary, secondary

treatment units. After complying the NCTL norms

then discharged in to the FETP through separate

pipe line drainage system.(Complied)

GIDC Water 211.69 KL

Process & Washing

81.99 KL

Boiler & Cooling

105.2 KL Other Use (Gardening

etc.) 8.5 KL

Domestic

16 KL

Process & Washing- 79.81 KL + Boiler &

Cooling 22.98 KL= Total Industrial Effluent

102.79 KL

Domestic 14 KL

Total Effluent 116.79

KL

8.5 KL use in Gardening

etc.

Loss 2.18 KL

Loss

WATER BALANCE-2016-17

2 KL Loss

Total Effluent 103.92

KL

Page 37: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

The effluent shall be

segregated at the

source of

generation.

The concentrated

effluent of high COD

stream shall be

incinerated and the

non-concentrated

effluent after

primary, secondary

and tertiary

treatment and after

complying to the

inlet norms of CETP

of PETL shall be

discharged in to the

CETP through GIDC

underground

drainage system.

The treated effluent

should be discharge

only after it meets

the standards

stipulated by the

Gujarat Pollution

Control Board/EPA

Rules.

We discharge our effluent by giving proper

treatment and after conforming the norms

prescribed by NCTL. We have regular monitoring

on monthly basis by third party i.e. M/s.

Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule –

II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-

294/404708/20 Feb 2017)

(Please find Annexure –Q)(Attached in hard

copy)

Date: 19/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017 Sr.

No.

Parameter Result Unit

1 pH 7.42 -

2 Temperature 30 0C

3 Colour Colourless -

4 Suspended Solids 432 Mg/L

5 Total Dissolved Solid 4988 Mg/L

6 Oil & Grease BDL Mg/L

7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L

8 Ammonical Nitrogen 13 Mg/L

9 BOD 118 Mg/L

10 COD 234 Mg/L

11 Chloride 388 Mg/L

12 Sulphate 810 Mg/L

13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L

Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FAB-2017 Sr.No

.

Parameter Result Unit

1 pH 8.05 -

2 Temperature 30 0C

3 Colour Colourless -

4 Suspended Solids 79 Mg/L

5 Total Dissolved Solid 5904 Mg/L

6 Oil & Grease 4 Mg/L

7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L

8 Ammonical Nitrogen 7 Mg/L

9 BOD 94 Mg/L

10 COD 238 Mg/L

11 Chloride 380 Mg/L

12 Sulphate 620 Mg/L

13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L

Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr.

No.

Parameter Result Unit

1 pH 7.30 -

2 Temperature 30 0C

3 Colour Colourless -

4 Suspended Solids 85 Mg/L

5 Total Dissolved Solid 4892 Mg/L

Page 38: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

6 Oil & Grease 6 Mg/L

7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L

8 Ammonical Nitrogen 11 Mg/L

9 BOD 18 Mg/L

10 COD 136 Mg/L

11 Chloride 420 Mg/L

12 Sulphate 642 Mg/L

13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L

Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr.

No.

Parameter Result Unit

1 pH 7.25 -

2 Temperature 30 0C

3 Colour Colourless -

4 Suspended Solids 87 Mg/L

5 Total Dissolved Solid 4868 Mg/L

6 Oil & Grease BDL Mg/L

7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L

8 Ammonical Nitrogen BDL Mg/L

9 BOD 20 Mg/L

10 COD 152 Mg/L

11 Chloride 430 Mg/L

12 Sulphate 648 Mg/L

13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L

Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr.

No.

Parameter Result Unit

1 pH 6.87 -

2 Temperature 30 0C

3 Colour Colourless -

4 Suspended Solids 91 Mg/L

5 Total Dissolved Solid 3810 Mg/L

6 Oil & Grease BDL Mg/L

7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L

8 Ammonical Nitrogen BDL Mg/L

9 BOD 44 Mg/L

10 COD 154 Mg/L

11 Chloride 425 Mg/L

12 Sulphate 646 Mg/L

13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L

Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr.No.

Parameter Result Unit

1 pH 6.80 -

2 Temperature 32 0C

3 Colour Colourless -

4 Suspended Solids 95 Mg/L

5 Total Dissolved Solid 3488 Mg/L

6 Oil & Grease BDL Mg/L

7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L

8 Ammonical Nitrogen BDL Mg/L

9 BOD 72 Mg/L

Page 39: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

The domestic waste

water shall be

treated off in septic

tank/sock pit.

The company shall

undertake studies to

reduce the COD in

the waste water.

10 COD 232 Mg/L

11 Chloride 426 Mg/L

12 Sulphate 673 Mg/L

13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L

We have facility to treat domestic waste water in

septic tank and then it goes to aeration tank for

biological treatment .(Complied)

We have not carried out any studies to reduce

COD in wastewater but we maintain the COD

levels below the prescribed norms and then after

complying the NCTL norms it is discharged in to

the FETP through separate pipe line drainage

system. (Complied)

In view of the information furnished by the PP and as no studies were undertaken to reduce COD in wastewater as well as complete monitoring of all the parameters stipulated in the CCA not available & in the absence of comparison of the monitored data with the inlet norms of CETP (however, TSS exceeding the stipulated norms of 150 mg/l in Jan.2017), the condition is considered partly complied. PARTLY COMPLIED

It is shown in above reports that the TSS is compiled in all monitoring data except on 19/01/2017. We assure to maintain norms of TSS in treated wastewater.

6. The ground water

quality in and

around the unit and

the hazardous

waste storage site

shall be regularly

monitored and the

data recorded to

ensure that there is

no contamination of

the ground level.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

We do not discharge waste water in ground, entire

waste water is received in ETP for treatment. After

than discharge to Vide Pipeline CETP (NCTL).

There is no contamination the ground level.

(Complied)

The condition mandates undertaking of monitoring for ground water contamination. PP has not done so and the submission does not justify their inaction in the matter.

Also, in the absence of test report, it cannot be stated that ground water is Not contaminated by the act of the unit. NOT COMPLIED

We are not using the ground water in the factory premise. Only GIDC water is used for

everything. GIDC/GPCB is not giving the permission for boring in and around the factory premises, hence, ground water sample analysis is not possible.

7. The company shall

install solvent

recovery system and

attempts shall be

made to achieve at

least 90% recovery,

wherever possible.

Rest of the solvents,

which cannot be

recovered, shall be

incinerated.

We have provided solvent recovery system. We

are achieving solvent recovery about

90%.(Complied)

Rest of solvent waste after distillation are sent to

RSPL for co processing.(Complied)

In view of the submission by the PP the condition is considered partly complied till the submission of requisite data showing 90% solvent recovery and details like permission sought from local authority/rules based on which the spent-solvent were sent to RSPL instead of incineration.

Partly COMPLIED

Please see the attach data sheet of solvent recovery.

Page 40: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

After distillation of solvent rest material sent to RSPL for co processing. RSPL Membership Certificate also our CC&A copy for authorization of co processing.

8. As reflected in the

EIA/EMP report, the

solid waste and the

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

Page 41: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

ash obtained after

incineration shall be

stored in a covered

shed with

impervious flooring

and leachate

collection system

within the plant

premises.

The sludge from the

ETP and the

incinerated ash shall

be finally disposed

off in a Common

Treatment, Storage

and Disposal Facility

(TSDF) at Bharuch

developed by M/s

Bharuch Enviro

Infrastructure Ltd.

The leachate shall

be sent to ETP for

treatment.

We have provided covered and RCC floor

Hazardous waste storage yard with leachate

collection system where we store our solid

waste.(Complied)

We have already obtained authorization in the

form of CCA from GPCB for the generation;

storage and disposal of hazardous waste i.e.

sludge from the ETP and the incinerated ash in

Storage and Disposal common Facility (Approved

TSDF site). (Complied)

We transfer leachate as feed in MEE plant.

(Complied)

During the site visit, it is observed that part of the hazardous waste stored is exposed to open skies near the MEE and the storage yard. PP shall take appropriate measures to ensure proper storage of hazardous waste at all times as well as periodically dispose of the waste instead of pile-up observed at the time of inspection. This is clear testimony that hazardous waste

management is not proper and needs improvement immediately in regard to adequate and appropriate storage. PARTLY COMPLIED

During the visit you have seen the stored MEE salt bags, it is our routine practice. First we store the nearest location of VTFD (On RCC flooring place with leachate removing system) and remove the maximum leachate than transfer to hazardous waste storage location.

9. The existing

incinerator shall be

upgraded within

eight months to

meet the

specification of this

Ministry/CPCB.

The destructive

efficiency of the

incinerator shall be

assessed by an

agency like the

Central Pollution

Control Board and a

report submitted to

the Ministry.

The company shall

comply with the

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

The Existing Incinerator was uninstalled and it was

replaced by MEE.

The Existing Incinerator was uninstalled and it was

replaced by MEE.

The Existing Incinerator was uninstalled and it was

replaced by MEE.

In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered partly complied subject to submission of requisite permission/intimation to the authorities concerned about replacement of incinerator by MEE. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITION

Please find attached acknowledgement sheet of information to board regarding stop the liquid feeding at incinerator.

Page 42: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

standards for

common hazardous

waste incinerators.

10. As per the charter

on corporate

responsibility for

environment

protection, the

bioassay test shall

be replaced by

toxicity factor test

method developed

by CPCB. Toxicity

factor of 4 (TF-4)

should have been

achieved by

December 2003 and

TF-2 should be

achieved by

JULY.2006.Action

Plan in this regard

shall be submitted

within three months

from the issue of

this letter.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017 submitted the following: The Bioassay test is carried out on a regular basis by third party Monitoring team selected and approved by GPCB. The reports are attached herewith for Perusal : Complied (Please find Annexure –X)(Attached in hard copy)

In view of the submission by the PP and the national emission standards for pesticides industries notified by MoEFCC vide G.S.R.446 E dated 13th june, 2011 mandates bioassay test, the condition is considered partly complied as no details were furnished w.r.t action plan submission. The details as desired above may be furnished by the PP to ascertain its compliance. PARTLY COMPLIED

We check the toxicity on regular basis through third party monitoring team.

11. Occupational Health

Surveillance of the

workers shall be

done on a regular

basis and records

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

We regularly carry out medical checkup on yearly

Page 43: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

maintained as per

the Factories Act.

basis of each employee through authorized

medical officer and maintain the records as per the

factory act rules.

(Please find Health Register Annexure -

R)(Attached in hard copy).

We also have our own Occupational Health Centre

with Doctor and Male Nurse available round the

clock.

In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is

considered complied subject to submission of relevant documentary evidences. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

We check the health of every each employee on yearly basis report attach as hard copy for your reference.

Page 44: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 45: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 46: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

12. The company shall

develop a green belt

in 25% of the

project area as per

the CPCB guidelines

and in consultation

with the local DFO.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

Our total plot area is 30000 m2 and we have

already developed green belt in 9281.18 m2 (i.e.

30.93%) of area in and around the factory

premises to mitigate the effects of fugitive

emissions all around the plant as per the CPCB

guideline.(Complied)

In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that greenbelt is not contiguous and found in patches along the plant boundary as well as details along the plant boundary as well as details furnished not in line with the field observation, the condition is considered partly complied. PARTLY COMPLIED

We assure that, we will develop the green belt in the factory premises, also the green belt area of factory boundary has improved better than past.

13. The company shall

adopt waste

minimization /

cleaner production

techniques to

reduce the pollution

load and action plan

in this regard shall

be submitted to the

ministry within three

months from the

date of issue of this

letter.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

This is a continuous process and below are few

areas of concentrated efforts :

I. Minimize the drum handling by introduction

of storage tanks wherever possible.

II. By-Product plant installed to recover

various salts from process streams like

sodium Sulphite, ammonium chloride,

Potassium chloride, sodium chloride &

purity is 95%.

III. RO installed to recycle treated effluents and

reduce Fresh water consumptions.

IV. We have installed the MEE, VTFD & RO

Plant for Waste Water treatment.

V. We are in process of developing a new

technology for reducing salt generation

from effluent by way of Algae treatment.

Pls find attached the sales documents of Ammonium Chloride, KCL, and Sodium Sulphite which is recovered and Sold to end users.

Page 47: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

In view of the information furnished and the silence of the PP w.r.t submission of the action plant within 3 months, the condition is considered partly complied till submission of requisite documentary evidences. PARTLY COMPLIED

RO operational random data of various dates… NCTL effluent discharged quality data analyzed by NCTL. Kindly note the values of Ammonical Nitrogen which is most important. Apart from same we have always adhered to the specified limit of NCTL inlet requirement of Effluent discharge and have never received any letter of violation from them. Snaps of MEE , VTFD and RO.

Page 48: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

14. The company shall

undertake rain

harvesting

measures and action

plan in this regard

shall be submitted

to the Ministry.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

Not Applicable as this is a Pesticide manufacturing

Unit During the site visit separate storm water drains were missing at few locations. In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered not complied till the submission of requisite amendment in EC to this extent. NOT COMPLIED

We have provided the storm water drain as required….but some of the areas are covered by cement slabs for cross over to the operational area. The storm water drains are not connected to the outside drain since in Panoli GIDC we cannot let water out to the open drain as per the directives of GIDC. The water from the storm drain are collected and recycled back to ETP. Snaps attached for your perusal.

Page 49: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

15 The project

proponent shall

comply with the

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

We will submit EIA/EMP/Risk analysis report. We got exemption from Public hearing vide letter no.

Page 50: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

environmental

protection measures

and safeguards as

recommended in

EIA/EMP/RISK

analysis report as

well as the

recommendation of

the public hearing

panel

We are complying with all the environmental

protection measures and safeguards submitted to

the Ministry. And we have already implemented

recommendations/suggestions mentioned in

EIA/EMP and risk assessment report.

In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to submission of detailed compliance of environmental protection measures and safeguards as recommended in EIA/EMP/RISK analysis report as well as the recommendation of the public hearing panel. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITION

Copy attached herewith for your reference.

16. The company shall

undertake eco-

development

measures including

community welfare

measures in the

project area for the

overall improvement

of the environment.

the eco-

development plan

shall be submitted

to the GPCB within

three month of

receipt of this letter

for approval.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

We are regularly taken part for eco development

including community welfare measures in the

project area for overall improvement of the

environment through Panoli industrial association.

In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to elaboration on the eco-development measure including community welfare measures undertaken in the project area over the past 3 years and other details like submission of eco-developmental plans to GPCB COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITION

Plz see our CSR activities participation.

B. General condition

1 The project

authorities must

strictly adhere to

the stipulation made

by the Gujarat State

Pollution Control

Board.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

We are strictly adhering to the stipulations made

by the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB),

State Government and any other statutory

authority.

In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to submission of detailed compliance of stipulations made by the Gujarat State Pollution Control Board. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITION

Please see attached sheet of third party monitoring teams complied report, we strictly follow the compliance of stipulations made by the Gujarat State Pollution Control Board.

Page 51: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

2 At no time, the

emissions should go

beyond the

prescribed

standards. In the

event of failure of

any pollution control

system adopted by

the units, the

respective unit

should be

immediately put out

of operation and

should not be

restarted until the

desired efficiency

has been achieved.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

Every month analysis the emission level by third

party. M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized

Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-

294/404708/20 Feb 2017) We ensure that in

case of any failure to the scrubbing systems , the

operations related to the equipment’s are stopped

, and the stand by systems are made operational

with immediate effect. The entire system is

monitored round the clock. We have installed a

stand alone plant for scrubbing of the Fugitive

emissions.

(Please find Annexure –G & H)(Attached in

hard copy)

Month of JAN-2017 Sampling

Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.4 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.6 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.9 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.6 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.34 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.9 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.23 15 Mg/Nm3

19/01/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.16 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of FEB-2017 Sampling

Date

Stack

Attach

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

Page 52: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

To

PM 3.2 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.5 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.0 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3

15/02/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.0 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.1 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.30 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.4 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

21/03/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.19 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of APR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.1 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.3 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.3 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3

19/04/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAY-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.5 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.7 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

17/05/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JUN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 3.8 150 Mg/Nm3

Page 53: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

SOX 5.1 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 2.3 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 6.8 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3

07/06/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JAN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.3 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 1.9 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.065 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.2 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.31 15 Mg/Nm3

19/01/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.057 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of FEB-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.1 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.8 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.0 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.066 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.29 15 Mg/Nm3

15/02/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.052 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.4 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.0 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.3 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.3 15 Mg/Nm3

21/03/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-

02

H2S 0.05 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of APR-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3

Page 54: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.2 15 Mg/Nm3

19/04/2017

+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02

H2S 0.048 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of MAY-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB Norms

PM 2.7 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.3 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.5 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.19 15 Mg/Nm3

17/05/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01

H2S 0.047 45 Mg/Nm3

Month of JUN-2017 Samplin

g Date

Stack

Attach

To

Paramet

er

Result

GPCB

Norms

PM 2.8 150 Mg/Nm3

SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3

NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3

HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3

CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3

HN3 4.1 175 Mg/Nm3

CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3

HC 0.13 15 Mg/Nm3

07/06/2017

(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER

PLANT-01

H2S 0.049 45 Mg/Nm3

In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. PP may also compare the analysis result with the national emission standards for pesticide industries notified by MoEFCC vide G.S.R.446 E dated 13th June, 2011. Needful up gradation of systems may be undertaken to meet the stipulated notified norms. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do

next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/ Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.

3 The overall noise

levels in and around

the plant area

should be kept well

within the standards

(85 dBA) by

providing noise

control measures

including acoustic

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

We are maintaining the noise level within the plant

area as standard prescribed by the board. To

control noise level within the premises we are

regularly carried out maintenance stirrers, pumps

machineries etc.

Page 55: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

hoods, silencers,

enclosures etc. on

all sources of noise

generation.

The ambient noise

levels should

conform to the

standards

prescribed under

EPA Rules, 1989 viz.

75 dBA (daytime)

and 70 dBA

(nighttime).

We have regularly monitor noise level within the

premises through third party analysis on monthly

basis by M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized

Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-

294/404708/20 Feb 2017).

(Please find Annexure –S & T) (Attached in

hard copy)

Date: 19/01/2017 Month of

JAN-2017 Day Time Night Time Sr.

No.

Location MIN Max Avg. MIN Max Avg

.

1 D.G.Set 64.8 72.8 69 64.3 71.9 68

2 Plant-01 66.5 71.1 69 62.1 72.0 67

3 Plant-02 64.2 73.3 69 62.3 74.0 68

4 ETP 63.3 70.0 67 66.1 71.2 69

5 Coal fired boiler

67.7 74.2 71 59.4 69.2 64

6 Chilling Plant

63.2 71.1 67 58.1 63.2 61

7 Fabrication workshop

54.4 71.6 63 57.3 71.3 64

8 Maintenance office

66.0 73.0 70 62.6 66.8 65

Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FAB-2017 Day Time Night Time Sr.

No

.

Location

MIN Max Avg

.

MIN Max Avg

.

1 D.G.Set 63.2 71.3 67 63.5 72.8 68

2 Plant-01 67.1 70.3 69 63.2 73.2 68

3 Plant-02 62.8 74.2 69 62.8 74.3 69

4 ETP 62.1 71.9 67 65.9 74.2 70

5 Coal fired boiler

66.8 73.2 70 58.8 69.1 64

6 Chilling Plant 63.9 71.4 68 58.5 63.6 61

7 Fabrication

workshop

54.3 72.6 63 56.4 72.2 64

8 Maintenance

office

65.7 73.7 70 63.8 66.9 65

Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Day Time Night Time Sr.

No

.

Location

MIN Max Avg

.

MIN Max Av

g.

1 D.G.Set 61.1 70.3 66 62.2 73.0 68

2 Plant-01 66.4 71.2 69 63.6 72.1 68

3 Plant-02 63.1 73.9 69 61.7 73.4 68

4 ETP 62.0 72.0 67 64.4 72.4 68

5 Coal fired boiler 65.4 71.1 68 59.0 69.0 64

6 Chilling Plant 61.8 72.4 67 57.7 62.4 60

7 Fabrication

workshop

51.8 73.7 63 56.6 71.2 64

8 Maintenance

office

65.9 72.2 69 62.5 66.4 64

Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr.

No

Location Day Time Night Time

Page 56: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

No

.

MIN Max Avg. MIN Max Avg.

1 D.G.Set 61.3 70.2 65.75 62.4 73.1 67.75

2 Plant-01 66.5 71.4 68.95 63.6 72.2 67.9

3 Plant-02 63.2 73.9 68.55 61.8 73.4 67.6

4 ETP 62.8 72.3 67.55 64.3 72.6 68.45

5 Coal fired

boiler

65.2 71.4 68.3 59.0 69.0 64

6 Chilling Plant 61.5 72.4 66.95 57.8 62.7 60.25

7 Fabrication

workshop

51.6 73.8 62.7 56.3 71.4 63.85

8 Maintenance

office

65.8 72.4 69.1 62.7 66.7 64.7

Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Day Time Night Time Sr.

No

.

Location

MIN Max Avg. MI

N

Max Avg.

1 D.G.Set 60.2 69.2 64.7 61.2 72.1 66.65

2 Plant-01 67.0 70.2 68.6 62.4 71.2 66.8

3 Plant-02 64.2 71.5 67.85 62.4 70.4 66.4

4 ETP 61.1 70.2 65.65 62.1 71.1 66.6

5 Coal fired boiler

64.4 70.4 67.4 60.1 70.0 65.05

6 Chilling Plant 62.1 71.4 66.75 59.3 61.4 60.35

7 Fabrication workshop

52.0 72.7 62.35 57.6 70.2 63.9

8 Maintenance

office

65.6 72.4 69 61.7 66.6 64.15

Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Day Time Night Time S

r.

N

o

.

Location

MIN Max Avg. MIN Max Avg.

1 D.G.Set 61.2 68.2 64.7 62.2 72.2 67.2

2 Plant-01 63.0 69.2 66.1 61.4 71.2 66.3

3 Plant-02 61.2 70.5 65.85 62.4 70.3 66.35

4 ETP 60.1 71.2 65.65 61.1 71.4 66.25

5 Coal fired boiler

62.4 69.4 65.9 60.4 70.1 65.25

6 Chilling Plant

63.1 68.4 65.75 59.5 61.3 60.4

7 Fabrication workshop

51.0 70.7 60.85 57.8 70.6 64.2

8 Maintenance office

63.6 71.4 67.5 61.2 66.1 63.65

*Location 3 m away from the source.

In view of the information furnished by the PP and as the noise monitoring levels are exceeding the stipulated norms during night time, the condition is considered partly complied. PARTLY COMPLIED

We will ensure to control noise monitoring level as per the stipulated norms of PCB.

4 The project

authorities will

provided adequate

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

Details & Bills copy attached for

your reference.

Page 57: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

funds both recurring

and non-recurring to

implement the

conditions stipulated

by the Ministry of

Environment and

forests as well as

the State

Government along

with the

implementation

schedule for all the

conditions stipulated

herein.

The funds so

provided should not

be diverted for any

other purposes.

We have earmarked sufficient funds for recurring

cost as per requirement and mentioned in EIA/EMP

for the operation of EMS.(Complied)

We ensure that the funds earmarks for EMS will

not divert for any other purposes.(Complied)

In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied subject to submission of elaborate compliance in respect of the said stipulation. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

Page 58: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 59: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 60: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 61: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 62: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 63: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

5 The project

authorities must

strictly comply with

the rules and

regulations with

regard to handling

and disposal of

hazardous wastes in

accordance with the

hazardous waste

(Management &

Handling) Rules,

2000. Authorization

from the State

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

We have already obtained authorization in the

form of CCA from GPCB for the generation, storage

and disposal of hazardous waste under the

hazardous waste rules 2000. We have already

obtained membership of TSDF.

(Please find Annexure -V)(Attached in hard

copy)

During the site visit it is observed that hazardous waste is not properly stored and is exposed to open skies near the MEE. PP shall take appropriate measures to ensure

During the visit you have seen the stored MEE salt bags, it is our routine practice.

Page 64: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Pollution Control

Board must be

obtained for

collection/treatment

/storage/disposal of

hazardous wastes.

proper storage of hazardous waste at all times. In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to submission of detailed compliance in respect of the said stipulation. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

First we are store the nearest location of VTFD (On RCC flooring place with leachate removing system) and remove the maximum leachate than transfer to hazardous waste storage location.

6 The stipulated

condition will be

monitored by the

Regional office of

this Ministry at

Bhopal/State

pollution Control

Board.

A six monthly

Compliance report

and the monitored

data should be

submitted to them

regularly.

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

Yes it is regularly monitored by the Regional office

of State pollution Control Board.(Complied)

Complied

In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to submission of addl. details like dates on which the compliance Reports were submitted by the PP and documentary evidences, thereof over the last 2 years. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

We hereby attached copy of third party compliance report last two years 2015-16 & 2016-17 submitted to GPCB.

Page 65: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

7 The project

proponent should

inform the public

that the project has

been accorded

environmental

clearance by the

Ministry and copies

of clearance letter

are available with

the State pollution

Control

Board/Committee

and may also be

seen at website of

the Ministry of

Board/ Committee

and may also be

seen at Website of

the Ministry of

Environment and

Forests at

http:/envfor.nic.in.th

is should be

advertised within

seven days from the

date of issue of the

clearance letter at

least in two local

newspaper that are

widely circulated in

the region of which

PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in

MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017

submitted the following:

Advertisement for the environment clearance for

the project has been circulated in the vernacular

language of the locality concerned and the copy of

the same has been forwarded to the Ministry’s

Regional office.

(Please find Annexure -U)(Attached in hard

copy)

Page 66: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

one shall be in the

vernacular language

of the locality

concerned and a

copy of the same

should be forwarded

to the Regional

Office.

As per the documents furnished by the PP, it is noted that the advertisement was made on August 18, 2005. In view of the above, the condition is considered complied. COMPLIED

Page 67: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation

Annexure–5

Page 68: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 69: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 70: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 71: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation
Page 72: PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year 2005. Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06) (b) Allocation