PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project...
Transcript of PART-1 DATA SHEET · 2018. 1. 29. · J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at that time project...
Monitoring the implementation of Environment safeguards
Ministry of Environment & Forest
Western Region, Regional Office, Bhopal
MONITORING REPORT
PART-1
DATA SHEET 1. Project type :
River-
Valley/Mining/Industry/Thermal/Nuclear/Other
(Specify)
Industry
2. Name of the Project M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD.
3. Clearance letter(s) OM No. and date J-11011/4/2005-IA-IIdated 11/08/2005
Location: Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli,
Ta. Ankleshwar
(a) District (s) BHARUCH
(b) State (s) GUJARAT
4.
(c)Location Latitude/Longitude 21062’00.02” N Latitude & 73005’00.10” E
Longitude
5. Address for correspondence M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD.
Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli,
Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116,
Gujarat
(a) Address of the correspondence Project Chief
Engineer (with pin Code &
telephone/Telex/Fax numbers)
Mr. Sunish K. Nair –Director
(Chief Engineer)
M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD.
Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli,
Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116,
Gujarat
Mobile no. 9377687000
(b) Address of the Executive Project
Engineer/Manager
Mr. Rahul Kumar
Manager
M/s. GUJARAT AGROCHEM PVT LTD.
Plot No. 2901 to 2906 , GIDC Panoli,
Ta. Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch – 394 116,
Gujarat
Mobile no. 9426740399
6. Salient Features
(a) Of the Project
(b) Of the EMP
M/s. Gujarat Agrochem PVT LTD is engaged in
manufacturing pesticides intermediate at GIDC
industrial Estate Panoli, is a large scale industry
engaged in manufacturing of pesticides
intermediates since 2000. Panoli is located in
Bharuch District, which is industrial Estate with
respect to Socio-economic and industrial
development. All the necessary infrastructure
facilities for industrial activities (i.e. Storage and
Handling of Materials, Telecommunication,
Transportation, Utilities, Medical, firefighting
etc.) are available within premises itself.
M/s. Gujarat Agrochem PVT LTD, Panoli Utilized
GIDG water as source of water. Company has
full-fledged Effluent Treatment Plant.
Water Environment:
We segregate the effluent in to two steams
(High COD/High TDS) & (Low COD/Low
TDS)
For High COD/High TDS Provided
Neutralization tank, Settling Tank, Equalization
Tank, 7 effect Multi Effect Evaporator (MEE)
(Stand By) and Vertical thin film Dryer (VTFD).
MEE Condensate Transfer to Biological System
for further treatment & MEE Concentrate Feed
To VTFD for Convert to Salt.
For Low COD/Low TDS Provided Collection
tank, Coagulation tank, Primary Settling Tank,
Aeration-1, Sludge Settling Tank-1, Aeration-2,
Sludge Settling Tank-2,Final treated Water
Collection tank,
The Discharge of wastewater after treatment is
sent to CETP (NCTL) Batch wise through NCTL
Discharge Tank 1/2.
Also we provided RO Plant for incase any
problem in Discharge of CETP than we feed the
Treated Water in RO Plant.
RO permeate Use in Cooling tower & Boiler feed.
RO Reject Transfer to High COD/High TDS for
MEE Feed.
Water Environment Monitoring
By In-house Env. Laboratory
By Third Party (Monthly Monitoring)
By On line Monitoring Every 15 min.
Air Environment
Flue gas emission
Air emissions are in the forms of flue gas
emission in boiler, which uses Steam Coal /
furnace oil as fuel. Sufficient height is provided
for effective dispersion of emissions. Bag filter /
Scrubbers, (Cyclone separator) are provided to
control the process emission.
Process Gas Emission :
Two stage Water scrubber for HCL & one stage
Alkali Scrubber for SO2 & CL2 for controlling
Process Gas Emission.
Operation of Recovery Plant: Sodium
Sulphate/ Potassium Chloride/Ammonium
Chloride is recovered from process waste
Operation & Maintenance of APCM Continuously.
Air Environment Monitoring -
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Stack/ Process Vent Monitoring
On line Monitoring Every 15 min.
Hazardous Waste
There are Nine categories of Hazardous Wastes,
We have Authorization from SPCB for
management of Hazardous Wastes.
Disposal of MEE Salt, ETP Sludge Spent Carbon
to common TSDF (M/s. BEIL, Ankleshwar,)
Disposal of Process Residue for co processing
(M/s. RSPL Panoli,)
Disposal of Process Waste Residue to CHWIF
(M/s. SEPPL- Bhachau, Kutch, GSPL-Palsana,
Surat, )
Green Belt Development continuously …….
7. Breakup of the Project area Total Area: 30000 m2
Green Belt Area: 9281.18 m2
(a) Submergence area : forest non-forest No forest non-forest area has been used.
Unit is located in Notified Industrial Area.
(b) Others Notified industrial estate
8. Breakup of the project affected population with
enumeration of those losing houses/dwelling
units only agricultural land only both dwelling
units & agricultural land & landless
laborers/artisans:
Unit is located in notified industrial area.
GIDC has allotted us this plot.
We do not have such detail.
(a) SC, ST/Adivasi Data is not available
(b) Others -
(Please indicate whether these figures are based
on any scientific and systematic survey carried
out or only provisional figures, if a survey is
carried out give details & year of survey)
Data is not available
9. Financial Details
(a) Project cost as originally planned and
subsequent revised estimates and the year of
price reference
Project completed in the year 2006 vide EC no.
J-11011/4/2005-IA-II dated 11/08/2005_ at
that time project cost was Rs. 6.5 Crore Year
2005.
Revised – 7.75 Crore (Year 2005 - 06)
(b) Allocation made for EMP with item wise and
year wise break-up
Detail is attached as per Annexure-A
(c) BC ratio/IRR and the year of assessment 0.60
Assessment Financial Year: 2016-2017
(d) Whether © includes the cost of EM as shown
in the above
yes
(e) Actual expenditure incurred on the project
so far
Rs. 36 Crore (Year: 2016-2017)
(f) Actual expenditure incurred on the EMP so
far
Total Rs.102.3 Crore (Year: 2016-2017)
10. Forest land requirement Not applicable as unit is located in notified
industrial estate
(a) The status of approval for diversion of forest
land for non-forestry use Not applicable
(b) The status of clearing felling Not applicable
© The status of CA, if any Not applicable
(d) comments on the viability & sustainability of
CA program in the light of actual field
experience so far
Not applicable
11. The status of clear felling in non-forest areas
(such as submergence area or reservoir,
approach Rods.), if any with quantitative
information required.
Not applicable
12. Status of construction (Actual &/or Planned) Existing Unit
(a) Date of commencement (Actual &/or
Planned) 28th FEB-2005
(b) Date of completion (Actual &/or Planned) 31st March-2006
13. Reason for delay if the project is yet to start. Not applicable
14. Date of Visit Site
a) Date on which the project was
monitored by the MOEF&CC, RO
Bhopal on previous occasion ( if any)
b) Date of the site visit for the present
monitoring report ( if Undertaken)
10.01.2007
20.07.2017
15. Details of Correspondence with project authorities for obtaining act on
plants/information on status of compliance to safeguards other than the routine letters
for logistic support for site visits. (the first monitoring report may contain the details of
all the letters issued so far, but the later report may cover only the letter issued
subsequently)
Date: Letter from RO Date: Letter from PA
20.07.2017: During the site visit, the PAs
have been directed to submit a revised
comprehensive compliance report with
documentary evidences.
30.08.2017 final revised comprehensive
CR received vide letter dated 16.08.2017
Annexure-A
Year wise Allocation made for EMP
Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost
Water Environment
ETP: 10.0 Crore 0.50 Crore
Air Environment
APCM 15.50 Crore 0.50 Crore
Haz Waste Rule
Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.50 Crore
0.20 Crore
2010-11
Green Belt Development: 1.0 Crore 0.30 Crore
Total = 27 Crore Total =1.5 Crore
Year wise Allocation made for EMP
Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost
Water Environment
ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 15.0 Crore 1.2 Crore
Air Environment
APCM 0.20 Crore 0.55 Crore
Haz Waste Rule
Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.00 Crore
0.50 Crore
2011-12
Green Belt Development: 0.05 Crore 0.35 Crore
Total = 15.25 Crore Total =2.6 Crore
Year wise Allocation made for EMP
Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost
Water Environment
ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore
Air Environment
APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore
Haz Waste Rule
Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore
4.90 Crore
2012-13
Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore
Total = 1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore
Year wise Allocation made for EMP
Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost
Water Environment
ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore
Air Environment
APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore
Haz Waste Rule
Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore
4.90 Crore
2013-14
Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore
Total =1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore
Year wise Allocation made for EMP
Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost
Water Environment
ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore
Air Environment
APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore
Haz Waste Rule
Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore
4.90 Crore
2014-15
Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore
Total =1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore
Year wise Allocation made for EMP
Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost
Water Environment
ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore
Air Environment
APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore
Haz Waste Rule
Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore
4.90 Crore
2015-16
Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore
Total =1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore
Year wise Allocation made for EMP
Year Wise Capital Cost Recurring Cost
Water Environment
ETP/MEE/VTFD/RO: 1.50 Crore 3.5 Crore
Air Environment
APCM 0.20 Crore 0.5 Crore
Haz Waste Rule
Construction of Haz Waste Storage: 0.12 Crore
4.90 Crore
2016-17
Green Belt Development: 0.07 Crore 0.40 Crore
Total =1.89 Crore Total = 9.3 Crore
Annexure–2
Compliance Report of SCN/DIR notice issued by the
CPCB/GPCB
Sr
No
SCN/DIR
Date
SCN/DIR notice Query SCN/DIR REPLY
1. B-
29016/04
/06/PCI-
I/5179
dated
22nd July
received
on 13th
Aug
Directions under Section
– 5 of environment
protection Act, for
installation of online
effluent and emission
monitoring system.
We received a letter from GPCB for installation of the
environment monitoring system on 27th March 2015, on
receipts of the same we initiated the purchase of the
required equipment’s for online monitoring. The
procurements details like purchase order copies of the said
instruments where submitted to the GPCB on the 14th April
2015. Copy of the letter and PO attached for your kind
perusal.
Further to this we wish to state that the management of
GUJARAT AGROCHEM LTD is serious in implementing all the
necessary systems as per the directives of CPCB. The major
equipment’s of Online monitoring system are imported and
are long delivery item and hence the delay in installation.
Please find below the current status of implementation of
the online effluent and emission monitoring systems.
Sr.
No
Descr
iption
Status Remarks Present
Status
1 On
line
pH
meter
Receive
d /
installed
2 Online
TSS
Analyz
er
Receive
d/install
ed
3 Online
TOC
meter:
Shima
dzu
Make
Shipped
from on
31st
July.
Will
received
at Site
on 25th
of Aug.
4 Online
Stack
Analyz
er
Shima
dzu
Make
Will be
received
by first
week of
Septem
ber
The data
uploading on
GPCB XGN site
will be started
Once the TOC
meter is
installed since
the SOFTWARE
for uploading is
common for all
the installation.
The online 24X7
monitoring
systems will be
commissioned
by 30th Aug. for
items 1, 2, and
3. Stack
Analyzer will be
commissioned /
uploaded online
by 15th of
September
It is
commission
ed and
installed.
receipts of Online pH meter and TSS analyzer, the shipment
details of TOC meter of Shimadzu and Stack Gas Analyzer.
Sr.
No
Description Remarks Present
Status
1 On line pH meter Tax Invoice
Copy of Vendor
/ and Goods
receipt Note
It is
commissio
ned and
installed.
2 Online TSS
Analyzer
Tax Invoice
Copy of Vendor/
and Goods
receipt Note
It is
commissio
ned and
installed.
3 Online TOC
meter: Shimadzu
Make
Performa
Invoice of
Shimadzu and
Shipment details
- Bill of lading
It is
commissio
ned and
installed.
4 Online Stack
Analyzer:
Shimadzu Make
Performa
Invoice and LC
details in the
name of the
Supplier.
It is
commissio
ned and
installed.
We Assure the Board we will comply with the installation
and commissioning of the 24x7 online monitoring systems
by the 30th Aug 2015.
In view of the above we request you to view our case
sympathetically and request not issue a closure. Further to
this we will ensure the commissioning and installation
certificate of the Systems will mailed and to your good
office immediately on installation of the same.
(Please find Annexure –B)(Attached in hard copy)
The Production was on in
the Unit
Sir, the production was on but on reduced capacity, it’s a
continuous plant which cannot be shut down immediately as
it might result in accidents.
Heavy fugitive emission
was observed
Sir, there was a momentary fluctuations of power failure
which resulted in the tripping of scrubber pump, giving rise
to fugitive emission. This was controlled with immediate
effect by restarting of the scrubber pumps.
2. GPCB/CC
A-
110(8)/ID
-
15129/32
8879 Dtd.
01.10.201
5
Alkaline contaminated
waste water was
accumulated in the
premises along with
monsoon water which
was drained to GIDC
drain going to Vand
Khadi.
Sir, we have provided peripheral storm drain around our
operational area. The storm drain is not connected to the
outside GIDC open drain.
We have installed a pump which pumps the water collected
in the storm drain back to ETP.
On the day of visit there was heavy rainfall, water had
logged on the entire road because of all the water from the
catchment areas, coming down & getting accumulated. The
pump which we have installed was under operation &
pumping back the entire water but since the rainfall was
heavy, created a flood like situation & water flowing from all
the catchment area, the capacity of pump was inadequate.
The catchment area water rain off from floor was
overflowing and going to the outside drain through the main
gate.
The storm water drain
was found Alkaline which
mixed with monsoon
water and was going out
a main gate
There was breach in the dyke wall of the C.S. Lye storage
tanks from
where the accumulated rainwater flowed in rendering the
PH alkaline
to the floor water runoff.
The highly alkaline water
sample drawn of
Brownish colour of which
Ph-11.57, COD:1349,
NH3N-91.8 observed
Sir, we wish to state that we did not discharge any effluents
to the storm drain nor to the outside common GIDC drain.
It was a situations which we did try our best to control and
not let out any floor runoff’s to outside drain but was not
completely successful. As soon as the rain subdued the
situation was brought under complete control.
Sir we reiterate we have full-fledged EMS System to take
care of our Pollution loads and we ensure the entire System
in fully operational and abide by the boards directives.
(Please find Annexure –C)(Attached in hard copy)
It was found that so
much quantity of fugitive
emission from the plant
was mixing in
atmosphere and
experienced
inflammation in eyes and
throat also. During
investigation regarding
this it is come to
knowledge that Unit’s
APCM was not working
efficiently.
We are operating the Bromine recovery and scrubber
system as effectively. The operator had gone to have his
evening tea and left the scrubber unattended hence the pH
had turned acidic around 4-5 momentarily resulting in
emission , which was immediately controlled by charging
Caustic Lye to the Scrubber from tank kept in the recovery
plant. The plant was restarted only after the off gases
where controlled. We will ensure that better administrative
controls.
Bromine Recovery plant
was seems to be very
weak and unsafe by
looking at glance during
today’s visit of your unit.
The bromine recovery plant is constructed of RCC, the
truss’s and other MS structural is to be yet to be painted
hence looks shabby. This will be taken up on priority. We
will ensure that better housekeeping too is improved.
Acidic was found from
Alkali scrubber on media
P.H Strip in bromination
Plant which shows that
gas occurred from
recovery is directly mix
in atmosphere.
Above unexpected incident mentioned in point no.1 disturb
pH of our scrubber system.
3. GPCB/CC
A-
110(9)/ID
-
15129/36
0575 Dtd.
24.06.201
6
Foul smell experienced
from high COD Collection
The Foul smell might be of Toilet block which is located near
the High COD collection premises.
Tank:
ETP Plant Primary
clarifier was found
inactive
Primary clarifier is in operation, but since the RPM is on the
lower might have got a feeling that’s it’s not operational.
Ambient Air Quality was
found very poor.
We always taking care and maintain the ambient air quality,
the ambient quality has deviated marginally on that day due
to the fugitive emission for Bromine scrubber.
So much Drums filled
with waste found stored
in open place in the Unit.
The drums are aqueous emulsions separated from the
process, which has be taken back for reprocess in the
plants. The area has been cleared off since then.
(Please find Annexure –D)(Attached in hard copy)
4. SCN-
410836,
29/04/20
17
As ER-1 verified it is
observed that unit has
manufactured
formulation products
(non consented
products) in April 16:
Cypermethrin
formulation – 38.3KL,
Thiamethoxam
formulation – 2.0MT. in
May – 16: Cypermethrin
formulation – 78.5KL,
Alpha Cypermethrin
formulation – 11.0KL,
Hexa Conazole
formulation – 21.0 KL,
Thiamethoxam
formulation – 2.8MT,
Deltamethrin formulation
– 28.0 KL, In June – 16:
Cypermethrin
formulation – 54.16KL,
Alpha Cypermethrin
formulation – 7.0 KL.
We would like to bring to your kind attention the production
data captured in ER – 1 of the formulation product are
meant for trading. These formulation products have been
manufactured by a third party on toll manufacturing basis.
The toll manufacturing has been carried out by formulations
like, Snehal Impex Pvt. Ltd, Baroda Agro Chemicals Limited
and Sulphur Mills Limited etc. who has valid consent from
the board. Job work challans attached for your perusal.
• Presently we applied for CCA ammendment to
GPCB Gandhinagar.
(Please find Annexure –E)(Attached in hard copy)
5. SCN-
410837,
29/04/20
17
Approx. 120 MT
hazardous waste (ETP
Waste + MEE Salt) was
found stored in
hazardous waste storage
area.
Our hazardous waste storage area capacity is 400 MT &
hazardous waste (MEE salt + ETP sludge) generation is 25
to 30 MT/Day. First of all we store (MEE salt + ETP sludge)
at hazardous waste storage area for drying work then sent
to landfill site. This is a standard operating procedure.
Approx. 2800 MT
hazardous waste is
temporally stored in the
unit named M/s. Tagros
As you know that in monsoon season all landfill sites are
closed. So, we are temporally storing MEE Salt at above
unit only during monsoon season. We have permission from
the Board for the same. Since the time of visit by your good
office the storage area has been cleared off & the MEE Salt
Chemicals, Ankleshwar. has been disposed off to landfill site. The storage is empty.
Approx. 100 drums of
semi-processed material
was fond store in open
area within premises.
During the visit of your officer on dtd. 08/12/2016, drums
were in transit from plant to plant for process/in process
inspection. As a part
Of our operation. Generally those drums are cleared on a
same day if not cleared, we store in safe mode.
(Please find Annexure –F)(Attached in hard copy)
Annexure–3
Part-II&III
DESCRIPTIVE REPORT ON STATUS OF COMPLIANCE TO CONDITIONS OF ‘ENVIRONMENTAL
CLEARANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
i) Compliance status of Environmental Clearance issued by MoEF & CC, New Delhi vide letter
No.: J-11011/4/2005-IA II (I) Dt. 11.08.2005
(Details of the project: Pesticide technical products, Gujarat by M/s. Gujarat Agrochem Ltd.)
A. Specific Condition
Sr.
No.
Condition Compliance Status Action taken after visit
1. The gaseous
emissions (SO2, NOx
and HCl) and
particular matters
from Various
process units should
conform to the
standards prescribed
by the concerned
authorities from
time to time.
At no time, the
emission levels
should go beyond
the stipulated
standard.
Company does regular monitoring on monthly
basis by third party i.e. M/s. Vairagya Consultants
(Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no.
GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017) of
gaseous emissions (SO2, NOx and HCl) and
particular matters from Various process units and
the results are found within the prescribed
standards.
Every month analysis the emission level by third
party.
(Please find Annexure –G & H)(Attached in
hard copy)
Month of JAN-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.4 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.6 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.9 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.6 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.34 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.9 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.23 15 Mg/Nm3
19/01/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.16 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of FEB-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.2 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.5 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.0 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3
15/02/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAR-2017
Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.0 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.1 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.30 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.4 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
21/03/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01 H2S 0.19 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of APR-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.1 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.3 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.3 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3
19/04/
2017
(WATER+CAUST
IC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAY-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.5 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.7 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
17/05/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JUN-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.8 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.1 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.3 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.8 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
07/06/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER
PLANT-01
H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JAN-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.3 150 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.9 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.065 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.2 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.31 15 Mg/Nm3
19/01/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.057 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of FEB-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.1 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.8 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.0 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.066 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.29 15 Mg/Nm3
15/02/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.052 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAR-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.4 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.0 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.3 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.3 15 Mg/Nm3
21/03/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.05 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of APR-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.2 15 Mg/Nm3
19/04/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.048 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAY-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.7 150 Mg/Nm3
In the event of
failure of pollution
control system(s)
adopted by the unit,
the respective unit
should not be
restarted unit
control measures
are rectified to
achieve the desired
efficiency.
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.19 15 Mg/Nm3
ER PLANT-01
H2S 0.047 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JUN-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.8 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.1 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.13 15 Mg/Nm3
07/06/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.049 45 Mg/Nm3
We ensure that in case of any failure of the
pollution control system(s), the operations related
to the equipment’s are stopped, and the stand by
systems are made operational with immediate
effect. The entire system is monitored round the
clock. We have installed a standalone plant for
scrubbing of the Fugitive emissions.
In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. PP may also compare the analysis results with the national emission standards for
pesticide industries notified by MoEFCC vide G.S.R.446 E Dated 13th June, 2011.Needful up- gradation of systems may be undertaken to comply with the said norms. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS as stated above. In future however, monitoring may be carried out through NABL accredited Consultants.
Sir, We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/ Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.
2. Ambient Air Quality
Monitoring Stations
Should be set up in
the down wind
direction as well as
where maximum
ground level
concentration of
SPM are anticipated
in consultation with
the state pollution
control board.
We have selected ambient air monitoring station in
consultation with the Gujarat Pollution Control
Board (GPCB) and ensured that at least one
station is installed in the upwind and downwind
direction as well as where maximum ground level
concentrations are anticipated. We have regularly
monitor ambient air quality within the premises
through third party analysis on monthly basis by
M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule –
II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-
294/404708/20 Feb 2017). The report of
ambient air quality monitoring is enclosed
herewith.
(Please find Annexure –I &J)(Attached in hard
copy) (MIN. MAX. tabulated based on the data
monitoring generation over a period from JAN-2017 to JUN-2017)
Avg. calculated based on the total reading of 6 months)
Location Parame
ter
Result GPCB
Norms MIN Ma
x Avg. Mg/Nm3
PM10 26.3 40 32.55 100
PM2.5 13.1 21 16.12 60
Sox 7.2 8.8 7.92 80
NOx 1.2 4.9 2.45 80
HCL 0.68 0.7 0.69 200
CL2 0.41 0.49
0.44 100
Main Gate
NH3 4.5 7.5 5.87 400
Locatio
n
Paramete
r
Result GPCB
Norms
MIN Max Avg. Mg/Nm3
PM10 26.3 40 32.55 100
PM2.5 13.1 21 16.12 60
Sox 7.2 8.8 7.92 80
NOx 1.2 4.9 2.45 80
HCL 0.68 0.7 0.69 200
CL2 0.41 0.49
0.44 100
Near ETP
NH3 4.5 7.5 5.87 400
Month of JAN-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 26.3 100
PM2.5 13.1 60
Sox 7.2 80
NOx 1.3 80
HCL 0.70 200
CL2 0.41 100
19/01/ 2017
Main Gate
NH3 4.5 400
Month of FEB-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 27 100
PM2.5 14.3 60
Sox 7.6 80
NOx 1.2 80
HCL 0.68 200
CL2 0.42 100
15/02/ 2017
Main Gate
NH3 5 400
Month of MAR-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 30 100
PM2.5 14.8 60
Sox 7.7 80
NOx 1.4 80
HCL 0.7 200
CL2 0.43 100
21/03/ 2017
Main Gate
NH3 5 400
Month of APR-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 34 100
PM2.5 16.3 60
Sox 7.8 80
NOx 1.6 80
HCL 0.68 200
CL2 0.45 100
19/04/ 2017
Main Gate
NH3 6 400
Month of MAY-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 38 100
PM2.5 17.2 60
Sox 8.4 80
NOx 4.9 80
HCL 0.69 200
CL2 0.43 100
17/05/ 2017
Main Gate
NH3 7.2 400
Month of JUN-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 40 100
PM2.5 21 60
Sox 8.8 80
NOx 4.3 80
HCL 0.7 200
CL2 0.49 100
07/06/ 2017
Main Gate
NH3 7.5 400
Month of JAN-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 24.3 100
PM2.5 12.3 60
Sox 11.2 80
NOx 3.5 80
HCL 2.7 200
CL2 0.69 100
19/01/ 2017
Near ETP
NH3 10.9 400
Month of FEB-2017 Sampling
Date
Locatio
n
Paramet
er
Resul
t
GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 26.1 100
PM2.5 13.2 60
Sox 10.2 80
15/02/ 2017
Near ETP NOx 3.2 80
HCL 2.3 200
CL2 0.7 100
NH3 10.8 400
Month of MAR-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 28 100
PM2.5 15.3 60
Sox 11 80
NOx 4.3 80
HCL 2.4 200
CL2 0.7 100
21/03/ 2017
Near ETP
NH3 11 400
Month of APR-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 32 100
PM2.5 16.3 60
Sox 11.5 80
NOx 5.3 80
HCL 2.2 200
CL2 0.69 100
19/04/ 2017
Near ETP
NH3 10.5 400
Month of MAY-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 35 100
PM2.5 16.8 60
Sox 11.8 80
NOx 5.2 80
HCL 2.4 200
CL2 0.7 100
17/05/ 2017
Near ETP
NH3 10.9 400
Month of JUN-2017 Sampling
Date Locatio
n Paramet
er Resul
t GPCB Norms
Mg/Nm3
PM10 38 100
PM2.5 19 60
Sox 11.5 80
NOx 5.7 80
HCL 2.3 200
CL2 0.8 100
07/06/ 2017
Near ETP
NH3 11 400
In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. In future however, monitoring may be carried out through NABL accredited Consultants. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
Sir, We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/
Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.
3. Fugitive emission in
the work zone
environment,
product raw
material storage
area must be
regularly monitored.
We are continue monitoring the product raw
material storage area and Godown area of leakage
or spillage also Every month analysis Fugitive
emission in the work zone environment level by
third party M/s. Vairagya Consultants
(Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB
no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).
(Please find Annexure –K&L)(Attached in hard
copy)
PLANT-01 Date: 09/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017
Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.19
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.57
Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FEB-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.21
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.63
Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.20
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.62
Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017
Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.21
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.63
Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.22
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.64
Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.23
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.65
PLANT-02 Date: 09/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017
Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.17
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.092
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FEB-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.13
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.12
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.11
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.09
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.12
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.08
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.13
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.09
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
The flue gas
emissions should
conform to the
standards prescribed
by the Gujarat
Pollution Control
Board.
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC)
ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.12
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.08
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Every month analysis the flue gas emissions of the
Boiler or DG sets by third party M/s. Vairagya
Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II
auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-
294/404708/20 Feb 2017).
(Please find Annexure –M,N,O,P) (Attached in
hard copy) Month of JAN-2017
Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Param
eter
Resul
t
GPCB Norms
PM 55.8 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 27 100 ppm
19/01/ 2017
BOILER
Coal NOx 11.6 50 ppm
Month of FEB-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Param
eter
Resul
t
GPCB Norms
PM 56.2 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 28 100 ppm
15/02/ 2017
BOILER
Coal NOx 11 50 ppm
Month of MAR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Param
eter
Resul
t
GPCB Norms
PM 55.3 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 27 100 ppm
21/03/ 2017
BOILER
Coal NOx 10.5 50 ppm
Month of APR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Param
eter
Resu
lt
GPCB Norms
PM 57 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 25 100 ppm
19/04/ 2017
BOILER
Coal NOx 11 50 ppm
Month of MAY-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Param
eter
Resu
lt
GPCB Norms
PM 59 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 26 100 ppm
17/05/ 2017
BOILER
Coal NOx 12 50 ppm
Month of JUN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach To
Fuel
used
Parame
ter
Resu
lt
GPCB Norms
PM 58 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 23 100 ppm
07/06/ 2017
BOILER
Coal NOx 11 50 ppm
Month of JAN-2017
Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 16.2 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.3 100 ppm
19/01/ 2017
DG SET-01
Diesel NOx 2.1 50 ppm
Month of FEB-2017
Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 16 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.1 100 ppm
15/02/ 2017
DG SET-01
Diesel NOx 2.3 50 ppm
Month of MAR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 16.5 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.3 100 ppm
22/03/ 2017
DG SET-01
Diesel NOx 2.4 50 ppm
Month of APR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 17 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.5 100 ppm
20/04/ 2017
DG SET-01
Diesel NOx 2.3 50 ppm
Month of MAY-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach
To
Fuel used
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 18 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.9 100 ppm
17/05/ 2017
DG SET-01
Diesel NOx 2.2 50 ppm
Month of JUN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 17 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12 100 ppm
08/06/
2017
DG
SET-01
Dies
el NOx 2.3 50 ppm
Month of JAN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 14.5 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.2 100 ppm
19/01/2017
DG SET-02
Diesel NOx 2.3 50 ppm
Month of FEB-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Parame
ter
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 14.2 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12 100 ppm
15/02/ 2017
DG SET-02
Diesel NOx 2.8 50 ppm
Month of MAR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 13.2 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.4 100 ppm
22/03/ 2017
DG SET-02
Diesel NOx 2.5 50 ppm
Month of APR-2017
Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 13.4 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.2 100 ppm
20/04/ 2017
DG SET-02
Diesel NOx 2.6 50 ppm
Month of MAY-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 16 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.3 100 ppm
17/05/ 2017
DG SET-02
Diesel NOx 2.7 50 ppm
Month of JUN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramete
r
Resul
t
GPCB
Norms
PM 17 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.2 100 ppm
08/06/ 2017
DG SET-02
Diesel NOx 2.6 50 ppm
Month of JAN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramete
r
Resul
t
GPCB
Norms
PM 18.8 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 14.9 100 ppm
20/01/ 2017
DG SET-03
Diesel NOx 3.0 50 ppm
Month of FEB-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramete
r
Resul
t
GPCB
Norms
PM 18.0 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 15 100 ppm
16/02/ 2017
DG SET-03
Diesel NOx 3.2 50 ppm
Month of MAR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramete
r
Resul
t
GPCB
Norms
PM 14.0 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 13 100 ppm
22/03/ 2017
DG SET-03
Diesel NOx 3.1 50 ppm
Month of APR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramete
r
Resul
t
GPCB
Norms
PM 14.5 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12 100 ppm
20/04/ 2017
DG SET-03
Diesel NOx 3.3 50 ppm
Month of MAY-2017 Sampling
Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramete
r
Resul
t
GPCB
Norms
PM 17.3 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.5 100 ppm
18/05/ 2017
DG SET-03
Diesel NOx 4.3 50 ppm
Month of JUN-2017
Sampling
Date
Stack
Attach
To
Fuel
used
Paramete
r
Resul
t
GPCB
Norms
PM 17.5 150 Mg/Nm3
So2 12.1 100 ppm
08/06/ 2017
DG SET-03
Diesel NOx 4.1 50 ppm
In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. In future however, monitoring may be carried out through NABL accredited Consultants. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
Sir, We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/ Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.
4. The process
emissions shall
be scrubbed
through caustic
scrubber and
conform
standards.
The efficiency
of the scrubber
shall be
maintained as
per the best
practicable
technology.
We have provided Two stage Water scrubber for
HCL & one stage Alkali Scrubber for SO2 & CL2 for
control process emission.
Yes it is monitored on regularly basis for pH and
maintained the efficiency of the scrubber also we
have regular monitoring on monthly basis by third
party i.e. M/s. Vairagya Consultants
(Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB
no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).
(Please find Annexure –G & H) (Attached in
hard copy)
Month of JAN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.4 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.6 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.9 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.6 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.34 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.9 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.23 15 Mg/Nm3
19/01/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.16 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of FEB-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach
To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.2 150 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.0 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3
15/02/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01 H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.0 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.1 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.30 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.4 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
21/03/ 2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.19 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of APR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.1 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.3 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.3 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3
19/04/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAY-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.5 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.7 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
17/05/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-
01
H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JUN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.8 150 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.8 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
2017 IC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01 H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JAN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.3 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.9 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.065 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.2 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.31 15 Mg/Nm3
19/01/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.057 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of FEB-2017 Sampli
ng
Date
Stack
Attach To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.1 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.8 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.0 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.066 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.29 15 Mg/Nm3
15/02/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.052 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.4 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.0 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.3 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.3 15 Mg/Nm3
21/03/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.05 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of APR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.2 15 Mg/Nm3
19/04/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.048 45 Mg/Nm3
VOC emissions
shall be
monitored and
data submitted
to the Ministry.
Month of MAY-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.7 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.3 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.5 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.19 15 Mg/Nm3
17/05/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.047 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JUN-2017 Sampling Date
Stack Attach
To
Parameter
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.8 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.1 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.13 15 Mg/Nm3
07/06/2017
(WATER
+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.049 45 Mg/Nm3
We regularly monitor level of VOC for Odour
control. Also we have regular monitoring on
monthly basis by third party i.e. M/s. Vairagya
Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II
auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-
294/404708/20 Feb 2017)
(Please find Annexure –K&L)(Attached in hard
copy)
PLANT-01
Date: 09/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.19
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.57
Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FEB-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.21
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.63
Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.20
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.62
Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.21
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.63
Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.22
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.64
Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.23
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.65
PLANT-02
Date: 09/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017 Sr.No. Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.17
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.092
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FEB-2017 Sr.
No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.13
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.12
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr.
No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.11
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.09
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr.
No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.12
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.08
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.13
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.09
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr.
No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Acetone ppm NIL
2 Diethyl amine (DEA) ppm NIL
3 Triethyl amine (TEA) ppm NIL
4 N-Hexane ppm NIL
5 Carbon tetrachloride (CTC) ppm NIL
6 Boron trifluoride (BF3) ppm NIL
7 Acrylonitrile ppm NIL
8 Hydrochloric acid ppm 0.12
9 Sulfur dioxide ppm 0.08
10 Acetic acid ppm NIL
In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. In future however, monitoring may be carried out through NABL accredited Consultants. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
Sir, We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/ Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.
5. As reflected in the
EIA/EMP the
Process effluent
generation shall not
exceed 120 m3/d.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
We are not generating more than permissible
limit of Process effluent.
(Please find Annexure –W) (Attached in hard
copy)
GIDC Water 193.76 KL
Process & Washing 74.09 KL
Boiler & Cooling 95.17 KL
Other Use (Gardening etc.) 8.5 KL
Domestic
16 KL
Process & Washing- 72 KL + Boiler & Cooling 19.05 KL= Total Industrial Effluent 91.05 KL
Domestic
14 KL
8.5 KL use in Gardening etc.
Loss 2.09 KL Loss
WATER BALANCE-2014-15
2 KL Loss
Total Effluent 105.05
KL
GIDC Water 205.83 KL
Process & Washing 78.71 KL
Boiler & Cooling 102.62
KL
Other Use (Gardening etc.) 8.5 KL
Domestic
16 KL
Process & Washing- 76.49 KL + Boiler & Cooling 13.43 KL= Total Industrial
Effluent 89.92 KL
Domestic
14 KL
8.5 KL use in Gardening etc. Loss
2.22 KL Loss
WATER BALANCE-2015-16
2 KL
Loss
We segregate High COD, High TDS and low
COD/TDS effluent streams.(Complied)
We treat High COD effluent in MEE and LOW
COD/TDS in ETP consisting of primary, secondary
treatment units. After complying the NCTL norms
then discharged in to the FETP through separate
pipe line drainage system.(Complied)
GIDC Water 211.69 KL
Process & Washing
81.99 KL
Boiler & Cooling
105.2 KL Other Use (Gardening
etc.) 8.5 KL
Domestic
16 KL
Process & Washing- 79.81 KL + Boiler &
Cooling 22.98 KL= Total Industrial Effluent
102.79 KL
Domestic 14 KL
Total Effluent 116.79
KL
8.5 KL use in Gardening
etc.
Loss 2.18 KL
Loss
WATER BALANCE-2016-17
2 KL Loss
Total Effluent 103.92
KL
The effluent shall be
segregated at the
source of
generation.
The concentrated
effluent of high COD
stream shall be
incinerated and the
non-concentrated
effluent after
primary, secondary
and tertiary
treatment and after
complying to the
inlet norms of CETP
of PETL shall be
discharged in to the
CETP through GIDC
underground
drainage system.
The treated effluent
should be discharge
only after it meets
the standards
stipulated by the
Gujarat Pollution
Control Board/EPA
Rules.
We discharge our effluent by giving proper
treatment and after conforming the norms
prescribed by NCTL. We have regular monitoring
on monthly basis by third party i.e. M/s.
Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule –
II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-
294/404708/20 Feb 2017)
(Please find Annexure –Q)(Attached in hard
copy)
Date: 19/01/2017 Month of JAN-2017 Sr.
No.
Parameter Result Unit
1 pH 7.42 -
2 Temperature 30 0C
3 Colour Colourless -
4 Suspended Solids 432 Mg/L
5 Total Dissolved Solid 4988 Mg/L
6 Oil & Grease BDL Mg/L
7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L
8 Ammonical Nitrogen 13 Mg/L
9 BOD 118 Mg/L
10 COD 234 Mg/L
11 Chloride 388 Mg/L
12 Sulphate 810 Mg/L
13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L
Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FAB-2017 Sr.No
.
Parameter Result Unit
1 pH 8.05 -
2 Temperature 30 0C
3 Colour Colourless -
4 Suspended Solids 79 Mg/L
5 Total Dissolved Solid 5904 Mg/L
6 Oil & Grease 4 Mg/L
7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L
8 Ammonical Nitrogen 7 Mg/L
9 BOD 94 Mg/L
10 COD 238 Mg/L
11 Chloride 380 Mg/L
12 Sulphate 620 Mg/L
13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L
Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Sr.
No.
Parameter Result Unit
1 pH 7.30 -
2 Temperature 30 0C
3 Colour Colourless -
4 Suspended Solids 85 Mg/L
5 Total Dissolved Solid 4892 Mg/L
6 Oil & Grease 6 Mg/L
7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L
8 Ammonical Nitrogen 11 Mg/L
9 BOD 18 Mg/L
10 COD 136 Mg/L
11 Chloride 420 Mg/L
12 Sulphate 642 Mg/L
13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L
Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr.
No.
Parameter Result Unit
1 pH 7.25 -
2 Temperature 30 0C
3 Colour Colourless -
4 Suspended Solids 87 Mg/L
5 Total Dissolved Solid 4868 Mg/L
6 Oil & Grease BDL Mg/L
7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L
8 Ammonical Nitrogen BDL Mg/L
9 BOD 20 Mg/L
10 COD 152 Mg/L
11 Chloride 430 Mg/L
12 Sulphate 648 Mg/L
13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L
Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Sr.
No.
Parameter Result Unit
1 pH 6.87 -
2 Temperature 30 0C
3 Colour Colourless -
4 Suspended Solids 91 Mg/L
5 Total Dissolved Solid 3810 Mg/L
6 Oil & Grease BDL Mg/L
7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L
8 Ammonical Nitrogen BDL Mg/L
9 BOD 44 Mg/L
10 COD 154 Mg/L
11 Chloride 425 Mg/L
12 Sulphate 646 Mg/L
13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L
Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Sr.No.
Parameter Result Unit
1 pH 6.80 -
2 Temperature 32 0C
3 Colour Colourless -
4 Suspended Solids 95 Mg/L
5 Total Dissolved Solid 3488 Mg/L
6 Oil & Grease BDL Mg/L
7 Sulphide BDL Mg/L
8 Ammonical Nitrogen BDL Mg/L
9 BOD 72 Mg/L
The domestic waste
water shall be
treated off in septic
tank/sock pit.
The company shall
undertake studies to
reduce the COD in
the waste water.
10 COD 232 Mg/L
11 Chloride 426 Mg/L
12 Sulphate 673 Mg/L
13 Phenolic compounds BDL Mg/L
We have facility to treat domestic waste water in
septic tank and then it goes to aeration tank for
biological treatment .(Complied)
We have not carried out any studies to reduce
COD in wastewater but we maintain the COD
levels below the prescribed norms and then after
complying the NCTL norms it is discharged in to
the FETP through separate pipe line drainage
system. (Complied)
In view of the information furnished by the PP and as no studies were undertaken to reduce COD in wastewater as well as complete monitoring of all the parameters stipulated in the CCA not available & in the absence of comparison of the monitored data with the inlet norms of CETP (however, TSS exceeding the stipulated norms of 150 mg/l in Jan.2017), the condition is considered partly complied. PARTLY COMPLIED
It is shown in above reports that the TSS is compiled in all monitoring data except on 19/01/2017. We assure to maintain norms of TSS in treated wastewater.
6. The ground water
quality in and
around the unit and
the hazardous
waste storage site
shall be regularly
monitored and the
data recorded to
ensure that there is
no contamination of
the ground level.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
We do not discharge waste water in ground, entire
waste water is received in ETP for treatment. After
than discharge to Vide Pipeline CETP (NCTL).
There is no contamination the ground level.
(Complied)
The condition mandates undertaking of monitoring for ground water contamination. PP has not done so and the submission does not justify their inaction in the matter.
Also, in the absence of test report, it cannot be stated that ground water is Not contaminated by the act of the unit. NOT COMPLIED
We are not using the ground water in the factory premise. Only GIDC water is used for
everything. GIDC/GPCB is not giving the permission for boring in and around the factory premises, hence, ground water sample analysis is not possible.
7. The company shall
install solvent
recovery system and
attempts shall be
made to achieve at
least 90% recovery,
wherever possible.
Rest of the solvents,
which cannot be
recovered, shall be
incinerated.
We have provided solvent recovery system. We
are achieving solvent recovery about
90%.(Complied)
Rest of solvent waste after distillation are sent to
RSPL for co processing.(Complied)
In view of the submission by the PP the condition is considered partly complied till the submission of requisite data showing 90% solvent recovery and details like permission sought from local authority/rules based on which the spent-solvent were sent to RSPL instead of incineration.
Partly COMPLIED
Please see the attach data sheet of solvent recovery.
After distillation of solvent rest material sent to RSPL for co processing. RSPL Membership Certificate also our CC&A copy for authorization of co processing.
8. As reflected in the
EIA/EMP report, the
solid waste and the
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
ash obtained after
incineration shall be
stored in a covered
shed with
impervious flooring
and leachate
collection system
within the plant
premises.
The sludge from the
ETP and the
incinerated ash shall
be finally disposed
off in a Common
Treatment, Storage
and Disposal Facility
(TSDF) at Bharuch
developed by M/s
Bharuch Enviro
Infrastructure Ltd.
The leachate shall
be sent to ETP for
treatment.
We have provided covered and RCC floor
Hazardous waste storage yard with leachate
collection system where we store our solid
waste.(Complied)
We have already obtained authorization in the
form of CCA from GPCB for the generation;
storage and disposal of hazardous waste i.e.
sludge from the ETP and the incinerated ash in
Storage and Disposal common Facility (Approved
TSDF site). (Complied)
We transfer leachate as feed in MEE plant.
(Complied)
During the site visit, it is observed that part of the hazardous waste stored is exposed to open skies near the MEE and the storage yard. PP shall take appropriate measures to ensure proper storage of hazardous waste at all times as well as periodically dispose of the waste instead of pile-up observed at the time of inspection. This is clear testimony that hazardous waste
management is not proper and needs improvement immediately in regard to adequate and appropriate storage. PARTLY COMPLIED
During the visit you have seen the stored MEE salt bags, it is our routine practice. First we store the nearest location of VTFD (On RCC flooring place with leachate removing system) and remove the maximum leachate than transfer to hazardous waste storage location.
9. The existing
incinerator shall be
upgraded within
eight months to
meet the
specification of this
Ministry/CPCB.
The destructive
efficiency of the
incinerator shall be
assessed by an
agency like the
Central Pollution
Control Board and a
report submitted to
the Ministry.
The company shall
comply with the
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
The Existing Incinerator was uninstalled and it was
replaced by MEE.
The Existing Incinerator was uninstalled and it was
replaced by MEE.
The Existing Incinerator was uninstalled and it was
replaced by MEE.
In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered partly complied subject to submission of requisite permission/intimation to the authorities concerned about replacement of incinerator by MEE. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITION
Please find attached acknowledgement sheet of information to board regarding stop the liquid feeding at incinerator.
standards for
common hazardous
waste incinerators.
10. As per the charter
on corporate
responsibility for
environment
protection, the
bioassay test shall
be replaced by
toxicity factor test
method developed
by CPCB. Toxicity
factor of 4 (TF-4)
should have been
achieved by
December 2003 and
TF-2 should be
achieved by
JULY.2006.Action
Plan in this regard
shall be submitted
within three months
from the issue of
this letter.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017 submitted the following: The Bioassay test is carried out on a regular basis by third party Monitoring team selected and approved by GPCB. The reports are attached herewith for Perusal : Complied (Please find Annexure –X)(Attached in hard copy)
In view of the submission by the PP and the national emission standards for pesticides industries notified by MoEFCC vide G.S.R.446 E dated 13th june, 2011 mandates bioassay test, the condition is considered partly complied as no details were furnished w.r.t action plan submission. The details as desired above may be furnished by the PP to ascertain its compliance. PARTLY COMPLIED
We check the toxicity on regular basis through third party monitoring team.
11. Occupational Health
Surveillance of the
workers shall be
done on a regular
basis and records
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
We regularly carry out medical checkup on yearly
maintained as per
the Factories Act.
basis of each employee through authorized
medical officer and maintain the records as per the
factory act rules.
(Please find Health Register Annexure -
R)(Attached in hard copy).
We also have our own Occupational Health Centre
with Doctor and Male Nurse available round the
clock.
In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is
considered complied subject to submission of relevant documentary evidences. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
We check the health of every each employee on yearly basis report attach as hard copy for your reference.
12. The company shall
develop a green belt
in 25% of the
project area as per
the CPCB guidelines
and in consultation
with the local DFO.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
Our total plot area is 30000 m2 and we have
already developed green belt in 9281.18 m2 (i.e.
30.93%) of area in and around the factory
premises to mitigate the effects of fugitive
emissions all around the plant as per the CPCB
guideline.(Complied)
In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that greenbelt is not contiguous and found in patches along the plant boundary as well as details along the plant boundary as well as details furnished not in line with the field observation, the condition is considered partly complied. PARTLY COMPLIED
We assure that, we will develop the green belt in the factory premises, also the green belt area of factory boundary has improved better than past.
13. The company shall
adopt waste
minimization /
cleaner production
techniques to
reduce the pollution
load and action plan
in this regard shall
be submitted to the
ministry within three
months from the
date of issue of this
letter.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
This is a continuous process and below are few
areas of concentrated efforts :
I. Minimize the drum handling by introduction
of storage tanks wherever possible.
II. By-Product plant installed to recover
various salts from process streams like
sodium Sulphite, ammonium chloride,
Potassium chloride, sodium chloride &
purity is 95%.
III. RO installed to recycle treated effluents and
reduce Fresh water consumptions.
IV. We have installed the MEE, VTFD & RO
Plant for Waste Water treatment.
V. We are in process of developing a new
technology for reducing salt generation
from effluent by way of Algae treatment.
Pls find attached the sales documents of Ammonium Chloride, KCL, and Sodium Sulphite which is recovered and Sold to end users.
In view of the information furnished and the silence of the PP w.r.t submission of the action plant within 3 months, the condition is considered partly complied till submission of requisite documentary evidences. PARTLY COMPLIED
RO operational random data of various dates… NCTL effluent discharged quality data analyzed by NCTL. Kindly note the values of Ammonical Nitrogen which is most important. Apart from same we have always adhered to the specified limit of NCTL inlet requirement of Effluent discharge and have never received any letter of violation from them. Snaps of MEE , VTFD and RO.
14. The company shall
undertake rain
harvesting
measures and action
plan in this regard
shall be submitted
to the Ministry.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
Not Applicable as this is a Pesticide manufacturing
Unit During the site visit separate storm water drains were missing at few locations. In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered not complied till the submission of requisite amendment in EC to this extent. NOT COMPLIED
We have provided the storm water drain as required….but some of the areas are covered by cement slabs for cross over to the operational area. The storm water drains are not connected to the outside drain since in Panoli GIDC we cannot let water out to the open drain as per the directives of GIDC. The water from the storm drain are collected and recycled back to ETP. Snaps attached for your perusal.
15 The project
proponent shall
comply with the
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
We will submit EIA/EMP/Risk analysis report. We got exemption from Public hearing vide letter no.
environmental
protection measures
and safeguards as
recommended in
EIA/EMP/RISK
analysis report as
well as the
recommendation of
the public hearing
panel
We are complying with all the environmental
protection measures and safeguards submitted to
the Ministry. And we have already implemented
recommendations/suggestions mentioned in
EIA/EMP and risk assessment report.
In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to submission of detailed compliance of environmental protection measures and safeguards as recommended in EIA/EMP/RISK analysis report as well as the recommendation of the public hearing panel. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITION
Copy attached herewith for your reference.
16. The company shall
undertake eco-
development
measures including
community welfare
measures in the
project area for the
overall improvement
of the environment.
the eco-
development plan
shall be submitted
to the GPCB within
three month of
receipt of this letter
for approval.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
We are regularly taken part for eco development
including community welfare measures in the
project area for overall improvement of the
environment through Panoli industrial association.
In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to elaboration on the eco-development measure including community welfare measures undertaken in the project area over the past 3 years and other details like submission of eco-developmental plans to GPCB COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITION
Plz see our CSR activities participation.
B. General condition
1 The project
authorities must
strictly adhere to
the stipulation made
by the Gujarat State
Pollution Control
Board.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
We are strictly adhering to the stipulations made
by the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB),
State Government and any other statutory
authority.
In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to submission of detailed compliance of stipulations made by the Gujarat State Pollution Control Board. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITION
Please see attached sheet of third party monitoring teams complied report, we strictly follow the compliance of stipulations made by the Gujarat State Pollution Control Board.
2 At no time, the
emissions should go
beyond the
prescribed
standards. In the
event of failure of
any pollution control
system adopted by
the units, the
respective unit
should be
immediately put out
of operation and
should not be
restarted until the
desired efficiency
has been achieved.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
Every month analysis the emission level by third
party. M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized
Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-
294/404708/20 Feb 2017) We ensure that in
case of any failure to the scrubbing systems , the
operations related to the equipment’s are stopped
, and the stand by systems are made operational
with immediate effect. The entire system is
monitored round the clock. We have installed a
stand alone plant for scrubbing of the Fugitive
emissions.
(Please find Annexure –G & H)(Attached in
hard copy)
Month of JAN-2017 Sampling
Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.4 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.6 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.9 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.6 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.34 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.9 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.23 15 Mg/Nm3
19/01/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.16 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of FEB-2017 Sampling
Date
Stack
Attach
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
To
PM 3.2 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.5 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.0 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3
15/02/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.0 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.1 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.30 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.4 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
21/03/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.19 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of APR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.1 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.3 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.31 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.3 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.22 15 Mg/Nm3
19/04/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAY-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.5 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.2 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.3 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.7 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
17/05/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.17 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JUN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 3.8 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 5.1 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 2.3 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.4 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.32 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 6.8 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.21 15 Mg/Nm3
07/06/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.18 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JAN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.3 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 1.9 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.065 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.2 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.31 15 Mg/Nm3
19/01/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.057 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of FEB-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.1 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.8 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.0 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.066 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.29 15 Mg/Nm3
15/02/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.052 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.4 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.0 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.3 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.3 15 Mg/Nm3
21/03/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-
02
H2S 0.05 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of APR-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.6 150 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.5 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.2 15 Mg/Nm3
19/04/2017
+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-02
H2S 0.048 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of MAY-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB Norms
PM 2.7 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.3 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.5 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.1 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.08 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.3 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.19 15 Mg/Nm3
17/05/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER PLANT-01
H2S 0.047 45 Mg/Nm3
Month of JUN-2017 Samplin
g Date
Stack
Attach
To
Paramet
er
Result
GPCB
Norms
PM 2.8 150 Mg/Nm3
SOX 4.2 40 Mg/Nm3
NOx 1.4 25 Mg/Nm3
HCL 2.2 20 Mg/Nm3
CL2 0.06 09 Mg/Nm3
HN3 4.1 175 Mg/Nm3
CO 0.00 150 Mg/Nm3
HC 0.13 15 Mg/Nm3
07/06/2017
(WATER+CAUSTIC) SCRUBBER
PLANT-01
H2S 0.049 45 Mg/Nm3
In view of the information furnished by the PP and the fact that the monitoring was not carried out by NABL/EPA approved laboratory, the condition is considered complied subject to acceptance of monitored data by MoEF&CC, New Delhi. PP may also compare the analysis result with the national emission standards for pesticide industries notified by MoEFCC vide G.S.R.446 E dated 13th June, 2011. Needful up gradation of systems may be undertaken to meet the stipulated notified norms. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
We are continuously monitoring through GPCB approved (M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-294/404708/20 Feb 2017).) We will change the Consultants /monitoring agency and will do
next monitoring through NABL/EPA approved laboratory/ Consultants. Compliance report will be submitted to your good office.
3 The overall noise
levels in and around
the plant area
should be kept well
within the standards
(85 dBA) by
providing noise
control measures
including acoustic
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
We are maintaining the noise level within the plant
area as standard prescribed by the board. To
control noise level within the premises we are
regularly carried out maintenance stirrers, pumps
machineries etc.
hoods, silencers,
enclosures etc. on
all sources of noise
generation.
The ambient noise
levels should
conform to the
standards
prescribed under
EPA Rules, 1989 viz.
75 dBA (daytime)
and 70 dBA
(nighttime).
We have regularly monitor noise level within the
premises through third party analysis on monthly
basis by M/s. Vairagya Consultants (Recognized
Schedule – II auditor by GPCB no. GPCB/EA-
294/404708/20 Feb 2017).
(Please find Annexure –S & T) (Attached in
hard copy)
Date: 19/01/2017 Month of
JAN-2017 Day Time Night Time Sr.
No.
Location MIN Max Avg. MIN Max Avg
.
1 D.G.Set 64.8 72.8 69 64.3 71.9 68
2 Plant-01 66.5 71.1 69 62.1 72.0 67
3 Plant-02 64.2 73.3 69 62.3 74.0 68
4 ETP 63.3 70.0 67 66.1 71.2 69
5 Coal fired boiler
67.7 74.2 71 59.4 69.2 64
6 Chilling Plant
63.2 71.1 67 58.1 63.2 61
7 Fabrication workshop
54.4 71.6 63 57.3 71.3 64
8 Maintenance office
66.0 73.0 70 62.6 66.8 65
Date: 15/02/2017 Month of FAB-2017 Day Time Night Time Sr.
No
.
Location
MIN Max Avg
.
MIN Max Avg
.
1 D.G.Set 63.2 71.3 67 63.5 72.8 68
2 Plant-01 67.1 70.3 69 63.2 73.2 68
3 Plant-02 62.8 74.2 69 62.8 74.3 69
4 ETP 62.1 71.9 67 65.9 74.2 70
5 Coal fired boiler
66.8 73.2 70 58.8 69.1 64
6 Chilling Plant 63.9 71.4 68 58.5 63.6 61
7 Fabrication
workshop
54.3 72.6 63 56.4 72.2 64
8 Maintenance
office
65.7 73.7 70 63.8 66.9 65
Date: 21/03/2017 Month of MAR-2017 Day Time Night Time Sr.
No
.
Location
MIN Max Avg
.
MIN Max Av
g.
1 D.G.Set 61.1 70.3 66 62.2 73.0 68
2 Plant-01 66.4 71.2 69 63.6 72.1 68
3 Plant-02 63.1 73.9 69 61.7 73.4 68
4 ETP 62.0 72.0 67 64.4 72.4 68
5 Coal fired boiler 65.4 71.1 68 59.0 69.0 64
6 Chilling Plant 61.8 72.4 67 57.7 62.4 60
7 Fabrication
workshop
51.8 73.7 63 56.6 71.2 64
8 Maintenance
office
65.9 72.2 69 62.5 66.4 64
Date: 19/04/2017 Month of APR-2017 Sr.
No
Location Day Time Night Time
No
.
MIN Max Avg. MIN Max Avg.
1 D.G.Set 61.3 70.2 65.75 62.4 73.1 67.75
2 Plant-01 66.5 71.4 68.95 63.6 72.2 67.9
3 Plant-02 63.2 73.9 68.55 61.8 73.4 67.6
4 ETP 62.8 72.3 67.55 64.3 72.6 68.45
5 Coal fired
boiler
65.2 71.4 68.3 59.0 69.0 64
6 Chilling Plant 61.5 72.4 66.95 57.8 62.7 60.25
7 Fabrication
workshop
51.6 73.8 62.7 56.3 71.4 63.85
8 Maintenance
office
65.8 72.4 69.1 62.7 66.7 64.7
Date: 17/05/2017 Month of MAY-2017 Day Time Night Time Sr.
No
.
Location
MIN Max Avg. MI
N
Max Avg.
1 D.G.Set 60.2 69.2 64.7 61.2 72.1 66.65
2 Plant-01 67.0 70.2 68.6 62.4 71.2 66.8
3 Plant-02 64.2 71.5 67.85 62.4 70.4 66.4
4 ETP 61.1 70.2 65.65 62.1 71.1 66.6
5 Coal fired boiler
64.4 70.4 67.4 60.1 70.0 65.05
6 Chilling Plant 62.1 71.4 66.75 59.3 61.4 60.35
7 Fabrication workshop
52.0 72.7 62.35 57.6 70.2 63.9
8 Maintenance
office
65.6 72.4 69 61.7 66.6 64.15
Date: 07/06/2017 Month of JUN-2017 Day Time Night Time S
r.
N
o
.
Location
MIN Max Avg. MIN Max Avg.
1 D.G.Set 61.2 68.2 64.7 62.2 72.2 67.2
2 Plant-01 63.0 69.2 66.1 61.4 71.2 66.3
3 Plant-02 61.2 70.5 65.85 62.4 70.3 66.35
4 ETP 60.1 71.2 65.65 61.1 71.4 66.25
5 Coal fired boiler
62.4 69.4 65.9 60.4 70.1 65.25
6 Chilling Plant
63.1 68.4 65.75 59.5 61.3 60.4
7 Fabrication workshop
51.0 70.7 60.85 57.8 70.6 64.2
8 Maintenance office
63.6 71.4 67.5 61.2 66.1 63.65
*Location 3 m away from the source.
In view of the information furnished by the PP and as the noise monitoring levels are exceeding the stipulated norms during night time, the condition is considered partly complied. PARTLY COMPLIED
We will ensure to control noise monitoring level as per the stipulated norms of PCB.
4 The project
authorities will
provided adequate
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
Details & Bills copy attached for
your reference.
funds both recurring
and non-recurring to
implement the
conditions stipulated
by the Ministry of
Environment and
forests as well as
the State
Government along
with the
implementation
schedule for all the
conditions stipulated
herein.
The funds so
provided should not
be diverted for any
other purposes.
We have earmarked sufficient funds for recurring
cost as per requirement and mentioned in EIA/EMP
for the operation of EMS.(Complied)
We ensure that the funds earmarks for EMS will
not divert for any other purposes.(Complied)
In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied subject to submission of elaborate compliance in respect of the said stipulation. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
5 The project
authorities must
strictly comply with
the rules and
regulations with
regard to handling
and disposal of
hazardous wastes in
accordance with the
hazardous waste
(Management &
Handling) Rules,
2000. Authorization
from the State
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
We have already obtained authorization in the
form of CCA from GPCB for the generation, storage
and disposal of hazardous waste under the
hazardous waste rules 2000. We have already
obtained membership of TSDF.
(Please find Annexure -V)(Attached in hard
copy)
During the site visit it is observed that hazardous waste is not properly stored and is exposed to open skies near the MEE. PP shall take appropriate measures to ensure
During the visit you have seen the stored MEE salt bags, it is our routine practice.
Pollution Control
Board must be
obtained for
collection/treatment
/storage/disposal of
hazardous wastes.
proper storage of hazardous waste at all times. In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to submission of detailed compliance in respect of the said stipulation. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
First we are store the nearest location of VTFD (On RCC flooring place with leachate removing system) and remove the maximum leachate than transfer to hazardous waste storage location.
6 The stipulated
condition will be
monitored by the
Regional office of
this Ministry at
Bhopal/State
pollution Control
Board.
A six monthly
Compliance report
and the monitored
data should be
submitted to them
regularly.
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
Yes it is regularly monitored by the Regional office
of State pollution Control Board.(Complied)
Complied
In view of the submission by the PP, the condition is considered complied Subject to submission of addl. details like dates on which the compliance Reports were submitted by the PP and documentary evidences, thereof over the last 2 years. COMPLIED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
We hereby attached copy of third party compliance report last two years 2015-16 & 2016-17 submitted to GPCB.
7 The project
proponent should
inform the public
that the project has
been accorded
environmental
clearance by the
Ministry and copies
of clearance letter
are available with
the State pollution
Control
Board/Committee
and may also be
seen at website of
the Ministry of
Board/ Committee
and may also be
seen at Website of
the Ministry of
Environment and
Forests at
http:/envfor.nic.in.th
is should be
advertised within
seven days from the
date of issue of the
clearance letter at
least in two local
newspaper that are
widely circulated in
the region of which
PP vide letter dated Aug.16,2017 received in
MoEF&CC, RO Bhopal on Aug.30,2017
submitted the following:
Advertisement for the environment clearance for
the project has been circulated in the vernacular
language of the locality concerned and the copy of
the same has been forwarded to the Ministry’s
Regional office.
(Please find Annexure -U)(Attached in hard
copy)
one shall be in the
vernacular language
of the locality
concerned and a
copy of the same
should be forwarded
to the Regional
Office.
As per the documents furnished by the PP, it is noted that the advertisement was made on August 18, 2005. In view of the above, the condition is considered complied. COMPLIED
Annexure–5