Parking Case Study Presentation

35
A PARKING PREDICAMENT A case study on parking availability in Grandview Heights and Bexley

Transcript of Parking Case Study Presentation

Page 1: Parking Case Study Presentation

A PARKING PREDICAMENTA case study on parking availability in Grandview Heights and Bexley

Page 2: Parking Case Study Presentation

Parking Case Study Studio Claire Cason, Alisa K Burnside, Sarah Davis, Brandon Goss

INTRODUCTIONS

Page 3: Parking Case Study Presentation

Parking Case Study Studio Tyler Hauck, Vincent Johns, Frank Johnson, Anthony Stevens

INTRODUCTIONS

Page 4: Parking Case Study Presentation

Recommendations

Analysis

Existing Conditions

Principles and Goals

Introductions

SUMMARY

Page 5: Parking Case Study Presentation

PRINCIPLES AND GOALS

Page 6: Parking Case Study Presentation

PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED

DEVELOPMENT

A LIVELY CORE FUTURE-READY TRAFFIC

MANAGEMENT

CLARITY IN PARKING

GOALS

Page 7: Parking Case Study Presentation

PlannersSteer direction of

development

CommunityDecision Makers

GovernmentRegulates and

Maintains

THE ROLE OF PLANNERS

Page 8: Parking Case Study Presentation

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Page 9: Parking Case Study Presentation

• Eastern Main Street → traditional suburban• Large setbacks• Abundant parking• One-story average

• Western Main Street → contemporary urban• Shallow setbacks• Limited parking• Dense, multistory buildings

• Design Guidelines• Implemented into the city code. • Goals: vibrancy, walkability, growth• Style & parking standards

• City of Bexley Survey, 2013• Shared parking• No parking meters

BEXLEY

Page 10: Parking Case Study Presentation

• Jurisdiction is split • Grandview Heights: 1st-3rd Avenue• City of Columbus: 3rd-5th Avenue.

•The Bank Block• Owned by the Wagenbrenner development company. • Local business tenants: Stauf’s, Jeni’s, SPAGIO

• Grandview

•Unique local economy

•Keep this area free of large chain establishments

GRANDVIEW AVENUE

Page 11: Parking Case Study Presentation

Bexley

Lack of wayfinding

Disconnected parking lots

Lack of bike paths

Inaccessible lots and unclear parking availability

Underutilized sites

Mismatched building types

IDENTIFIED ISSUES: BEXLEY

Page 12: Parking Case Study Presentation

Grandview Heights

Lack of wayfinding

Lack of parking agreements

Parking lots separated by barriers

Heavy reliance on automobile transportation

Underutilized sites

IDENTIFIED ISSUES: GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS

Page 13: Parking Case Study Presentation

DATA ANALYSIS

Page 14: Parking Case Study Presentation

Bexley Parking Maps

Friday 11:00 AM - Morning

Weekday 10:30 - Morning

Saturday 6:00 PM - Weekend

Page 15: Parking Case Study Presentation

• The library parking lot stayed at or near capacity during business hours

• The Starbucks parking lot stayed at or near capacity during business hours

• The Rusty Bucket Parking lot also stayed full during business hours

• Religious organizations only had full parking lots on their primary day of worship

BEXLEY HEAT MAP

Page 16: Parking Case Study Presentation

Grandview Parking MapsWednesday 11:30 AM - Lunch Sunday 4:30 pm - EveningFriday 11:30 am - Lunch Friday 7:00 PM - Evening

Page 17: Parking Case Study Presentation

• Bank Block Lot, Balboa parking almost always congested

• Giant Eagle Lot proved to be a critical parking source

• Parking concentrated near destinations

GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS: HEAT MAP

Page 18: Parking Case Study Presentation

Stakeholders Interviews• City Officials: Mayor Ben Kessler and Kathy Rose• Institutional Leaders: Rachel Rubin, Director of the Bexley Public Library

• Key Takeaways•Pedestrian-oriented streetscape•Dense multi-story commercial space, energy & vibrancy

• “Parking issue is about perception.”• Extend the vibrancy of new western development

STAKEHOLDERS: BEXLEY

Page 19: Parking Case Study Presentation

Stakeholders Interviews• City officials: Mayor Ray DeGraw and City Planner Pat Bowman• Columbus Planning Department: Mark Dravillas• 5th by Northwest neighborhood commission: Ashley Hofmaster• Business Owners: Staufs, Mark Swanson, Chelsea Cabot• Developers: Jeff Waggenbrenner• Residents Megan Miller

Key Takeaways• The Giant Eagle Lot is a key concern• Parking meters are a controversial issue• Promote vibrancy, diversity, mix of businesses and walkability of the corridor• Parking agreements are needed in the future and stakeholders are open to the idea

STAKEHOLDERS: GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS

Page 20: Parking Case Study Presentation

Core recommendations to be implemented on a systematic timeline

THE PLAN

Page 21: Parking Case Study Presentation

RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 22: Parking Case Study Presentation

BEXLEY RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 23: Parking Case Study Presentation

1-2 Year Recommendations

• Wayfinding• Clear parking signs• Parking guidance systems

• Shared Parking Agreements• Maximizing current parking infrastructure

• Combine and Restripe Lots

Page 24: Parking Case Study Presentation

2-4 Year Recommendations

•Combine lots with barriers

Page 25: Parking Case Study Presentation

4-5 Year Recommendations

• Improve bikeability•Create a bike boulevard

•Improve access and connectivity

Page 26: Parking Case Study Presentation

4-5 Years Recommendations

• Adapting existing buildings• Improving the pedestrian realm

Page 27: Parking Case Study Presentation

5+ Years Recommendations

• Developing Underutilized sites

Page 28: Parking Case Study Presentation

GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 29: Parking Case Study Presentation

1-2 Year Recommendations

• Wayfinding and Signage• Clear parking signs• Marking for lots on street

• Shared Parking Agreements• Noted as struggle

• Valet Parking and Strategies• Combine and Restripe Lots

Page 30: Parking Case Study Presentation

2-3 Year Recommendations

• Combine lots with Barriers• Install Meters• Improve Access and Connectivity

Page 31: Parking Case Study Presentation

2-3 Year Recommendations

•Improve Bikeability•Create a bike boulevard

•Improve access and connectivity

Source: Grandview Heights Bike Plan 2016

Page 32: Parking Case Study Presentation

3-4 Year Recommendations

• Redevelop Vacant Lots• Pedestrian Realm Improvements• Implement Bus Circulator

Page 33: Parking Case Study Presentation

• Redevelop Underutilized SitesPanzero’s PizzaGrandview CarryoutSpencer Research

5+ Years Recommendations

Page 34: Parking Case Study Presentation

• These recommendations will maintain welcoming corridors that are easily accessible to the community.

• Pedestrian oriented development • Clarity in Parking• Create lively cores• Future ready traffic management

• To maintain • Host quarterly stakeholder meetings • Review all parking designs and requirements every 5 years

CONCLUSION

Page 35: Parking Case Study Presentation

Questions?

A PARKING PREDICAMENT