Panparks missoula

42
Soomaa NP © Arne Ader

description

this is a presentation which I used in M

Transcript of Panparks missoula

Page 1: Panparks missoula

Soomaa NP © Arne Ader

Page 2: Panparks missoula

Paanajärvi NP © Viktor

Gritsuk

CHALLENGES, EXAMPLESand many more, Payments for Ecosystem Services in Europe’s wilderness areasZoltán Kun, Executive DirectorPAN Parks Foundation

Page 3: Panparks missoula

Oulanka NP © Kimmo Salminen

Presentation outline

• introduction to PAN Parks Foundation + personal intro• situation and tendencies in Europe• the European case of Ecosystem Services linked to wilderness• questions about how to go forwardALL IMAGES from EUROPE

Page 4: Panparks missoula

Wilderness is closer than you think ...

Page 5: Panparks missoula

Borjomi-Kharagauli NP © Kote Gabrichidze

„...about 1% of Europe’s territory ...can be called wilderness area”Ladislav Miko,EC DG Environment

Wilderness is a scarce resource in Europe!

Wilderness in Europe

Page 6: Panparks missoula

Paanajärvi NP ©Viktor Gritsuk

What is PAN Parks?

PAN Parks works to protect Europe’s wilderness, the continent’s most undisturbed areas of nature

Page 7: Panparks missoula

©iStock/Graeme Purdy

237 000 ha of wilderness

Wilderness momentum

• European Parliament’s special report on wilderness

• European Commission- ‘Agenda for Wilderness’

• Wilderness in Biodiversity Strategy

What we have achieved so far

Page 8: Panparks missoula

Network of certified PAN Parks

Page 9: Panparks missoula

Archipelago NP © Seppo Keränen

The Million Project

To ensure guaranteed protection of 1 million hectares of wilderness in Europe by 2015

Page 10: Panparks missoula

What is wilderness?

• nature is left to develop on its own• native species, animals roam free• no human intervention

Oulanka NP ©Hannu Hautala

Page 11: Panparks missoula

Fulufjallet NP © Vitantonio Dell’Orto

What is PAN Parks Wilderness?

NO extractive use such as•hunting•fishing•mining•logging•grazing•grass cutting•road and building constructionis allowed in PAN Parks wilderness

Page 12: Panparks missoula

What is PAN Parks Wilderness?

...but visitors have the opportunity to enjoy PAN Parks Wilderness!

Paanajärvi NP ©Minna Koramo

Page 13: Panparks missoula
Page 14: Panparks missoula

Peneda-Geres NP © Marcos Veiga

Europe’s perceptive wilderness

Page 15: Panparks missoula

Archipelago NP © Janne Gröning

European tendencies

Threats and Opportunities exist parallel

• wilderness comes up on the agenda (catch phrase?)• land abandonment provides opportunity to restore• wilderness disappears• restoration is more attractive than protection of existing areas!

Page 16: Panparks missoula

European Wilderness Research Agenda initiated by PAN Parks

Page 17: Panparks missoula

Central Balkan NP © Evgeni Diniev

Research database

Setting up a searchable, public Wilderness Resource Bank (analogy to Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute website)

• top 3: PA management, ecosystems, species conservation

• down 3: climate change, ecosystem services, financing wilderness protection

Page 18: Panparks missoula

Payments for Ecosystem Services

Majella NP ©MNP

TEEB report

• introduces the PES term

• PES can be an opportunity to raise additional resources and explain the real values of wilderness beyond biodiversity

Page 19: Panparks missoula

Archipelago NP © Heidi Arponen

Challenge 1

How the definition of wilderness applies to the case of indigenous / local needs (is it an excuse in Europe?)• Example 1: Nordic countries• Example 2: Peneda-Geres, Portugal• Example 3: Retezat, Romania

Page 20: Panparks missoula

Paanajärvi NP © PNP Archives

Challenge 2

We are still in a stage in Europe when we need to explain the biodiversity benefits of wilderness

Page 21: Panparks missoula

Hunter/Gatherers

Pre-1900

UtilitarianNatural Regulation

Ecological Integrity

1900s-1950s 1950s-1990s Post 1990s

PROTECTED AREA ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY

Page 22: Panparks missoula

Challenge 3

Majella NP © Bruno D’Amicis

How to apply the PES under the current economic structure

• Example of shorting on biodiversity loss!

Page 23: Panparks missoula

Conflict between indirect (ecocentric) and direct (anthropocentric) interpretation of Ecosystem Services

Page 24: Panparks missoula

Retezat NP © Mihai Moiceanu

Based on our current definition• they are linked to non-use / existence / bequest values• re: challenge with the definition! How much are we willing to make a compromise?

Classification of Ecosystem Services

Page 25: Panparks missoula

Retezat NP © Mihai Moiceanu

Challenge 4• Plenty of examples in Europe linked to direct use values but significant lack of role models for paying for indirect or non-extrective values

• Examples: 1. economic valuation of Tatra and Slovensky raj National Parks 2. our Tourism Model

Page 26: Panparks missoula

© Gunther Desmedt

Page 27: Panparks missoula

© Eki Ollila

Page 28: Panparks missoula

Climate Change and Resource Efficiency

© Basecamp Oulanka

Page 29: Panparks missoula

A short introduction…

PAN Village is founded as an initiative from WWF and Molecaten.

Mission:Creating a balance between wilderness conservation and tourism in Europe

•Offering tourist accommodations and nature activities in or close to wilderness areas•Stimulating local economy•Supporting the PAN Parks Foundation:

• (joint) promotion of wilderness areas in Europe• financial support for wilderness conservation

Page 30: Panparks missoula

We need to test and apply various valuation tools

• assessing trade-offs between competing uses of ecosystems• restoration vs cost of in-action

• transboundary services

Central Balkan NP ©CBNP

Challenge 5

Page 31: Panparks missoula

Biodiversity haven and beyond....• good examples are needed for biodiversity• ...social benefits• ...economic benefits

Oulanka NP ©Michael Hennemann

Defining the role of wilderness

Page 32: Panparks missoula

Borjomi-Kharagauli NP © Kote Gabrichidze

Looking for good examples• social benefits: youth at risk projects• economic benefits: failure to mobilise the corporate sector• tax pressure in Europe!• Example: Nokia in Finland• Example: pasta factory in Italy• Example: Sofia vs Rila NP

Challenge 6 (re. challenge 2 biodiversity)

Page 33: Panparks missoula

Challenge 7

Retezat NP ©iStock/Falk Kienas

• mainstreaming ecosystem accounting in Europe

• corporate projects to enhance biodiversity protection (how relevant they are for wilderness?)

• Example: Audi in Györ

Page 34: Panparks missoula

Challenge 8

Borjomi-Kharagauli NP ©Kote Gabrichidze

Promoting good European examples as role models (after finding them)!

Page 35: Panparks missoula

Oulanka NP © Kimmo Salminen

Case studies

A study to be finalised by 15 December

• PAN Parks Tourism Model

• Drinking water• Flood mitigation• Carbon market

• Biodiversity market

Page 36: Panparks missoula

Retezat NP ©iStock/Falk Kienas Oulanka NP ©Hannu Hautala

Communication

More understanding is needed in Europe

• different target groups (youth!)

• evidences needed

Page 37: Panparks missoula

Rila NP © Nicolas Cegalerba

How to communicate?

Page 38: Panparks missoula

Whom to talk to?

Page 39: Panparks missoula

How people interact with nature? Wilderness helps to re-establish the lost relation

Page 40: Panparks missoula

Show (and not tell) a story!

Page 41: Panparks missoula

PAN Parks works to protect

Europe’s wilderness, the

continent’s most undisturbed areas

of nature

http://panparks.orghttp://facebook.com/panparks

http://panparks.org/user/registerhttp://linkedin.com/panparksgrouphttp://youtube.com/user/PANParks

http://storiesofwilderness.panparks.orghttp://mymillionproject.ning.com

[email protected]

Page 42: Panparks missoula

Be part of it!...