Page 1 of 6 August 14, 2014 Commodity Classification Standards ...

of 6

August 14, 2014 Commodity Classification Standards Board Attn: Joel L. Ringer, Chairman 1001 North Fairfax St Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314-1798 Subject: Notice of Proposed Amendments to the National Motor Freight Classification Re: Reclassification of Refrigerators or Freezers, including Cooling or Freezing Rooms, Room Panels or Wall Sections; Proposed Amendment of NMFC Item 53025, and Proposed Cancelation of NMFC Items 53100 and 53120 with Reference to Item 53025 and to a Proposed New Item – Docket 2014-3, Subject 1 Dear Mr. Ringer, I respectfully request the following information be considered to the above proposed amendments as outlined in Docket 2014-3 Subject 1. Specifically, not to change Item 53120 (our current classification for my company’s product) to either Item 53025 which is based on the density of each shipment or to increase the classification to 175 under proposed item 53129. Beverage Air manufactures and distributes stand-alone commercial refrigerators and freezers for the food service industry. Listed below are a few examples of the units we produce at our manufacturing facility in Brookville, PA.

Distribution Center ∙ 1082 Route 28 ∙ Brookville, PA 15825 Phone: (814) 849-2022 ∙ Fax: (814) 849-2426

CCSB DOCKET 2014-3 SECTION 1

of 6

Transportation Characteristics Density - Our product ranges in density from 1.9 to 15.6 pcf, with an average density of 7.7 pcf. An average density of 7.7 is generally associated with a class 125. I have listed a breakdown of our current product by freight class for your review. We currently have 4,478 finished goods SKU’s and as shown below the majority of our product fall into class 125. If we take into account our current rates with our contracted LTL carriers (class 110), increasing the class to 175 would increase our yearly freight spend by $2.3 million; which would present a significant financial burden to our operations.

Handling and Stowability – As part of the amendments analysis it stated that “Instructions on the products’ packaging may advise the carrier to “Fork From This End Only,” limiting the carrier’s ability to handle the product from more than one side” (para 2, pg. 5). This statement is not meant as a limitation but is for safety reasons and is listed for the carrier’s protection. The design of many of our products has the refrigeration system at one end of the unit (see below picture). This is the heaviest end of the unit and represents approximately two-thirds of the total weight of the unit.


of 6

Standard fork truck operation requires that the heaviest end of the load being handled be closest to the fork carriage. This is required to ensure stability of the load whereas handling it from the wrong side could cause the fork truck to tip over endangering the life of the operator. Beverage Air, utilizing International Safe Transit performance testing protocols along with the additional cost of packaging development to prevent damages, is confident that our packages can be handled and stowed in any normal method that the carrier prefers. Our markings are only to protect the carrier from possible injuries to their personnel. Providing the carriers with specific information pertaining to our products’ center of gravity only helps to ensure safe handling and minimizes damage that can occur during transit. The packaging was designed to be handled by forks and/or mechanical movement. As with any palletized shipment, the freight should be handled utilizing the pallet. In regards to paragraph 3, page 5, the “precautionary markings on the handling unit and/or bill of lading, such as “Do Not Stack,” “Do Not Step” or “Do Not Crush”, does not apply to my company’s product. As shown in the below picture (pictured left) the packaging of our product has been designed to allow stacking of our product on our product. It would preclude stacking other products onto ours but with the introduction of the SafeStack Cargo Loading System (pictured right) this would negate the above issues with carriers who have introduced these systems into their fleets. In reference to the statement “In addition, many of these products must be handled and stowed in a particular orientation. This may result in less than optimum utilization of the available vehicle cube”. As shown in the below pictures, when feasible, our products have been designed with four way skids that will allow “optimum utilization of available vehicle cube”. The four-way skids are not on all or of products but are on most of our upright units to allow for easier handling.


of 6

Liability – Beverage Air has spent a great deal of time, money, and resources on the packaging of our products. Many of our products have been sent to Multi-Wall Packaging Corp., a CCSB Registered Testing Lab, to have our packaging certified under NMFC Item 180 Certified Packaged Products. I have enclosed the Rule 180 Test Report Forms of the products that were tested. All our products are lag bolted to the pallets; which are all made of hardwood and have been designed to ensure our product is protected. The pallet runners have been placed not only for proper weight displacement, but to also accommodate different fork lengths (pictured left). When a material handler tilts the forks upward, the forks will hit a runner and not the unit. Many of our pallets have been designed with four-way access (discussed in previous section) to allow for easier handling. We have also designed and incorporated a 900 pound, tri-wall box for many of the horizontal units that we produce (pictured right). The strength of this box safely supports our product being double stacked and allows for full utilization of space within a trailer (shown in the previous section). As stated under the Liability section, paragraph 1, page 6, “A third carrier reported a claims ration of 0.61% for shipments moving under NMFC 53120. Additionally, our packaging upgrades have also shown a significant reduction in damages to our product. From January 1, 2014 to July 31, 2014, Beverage Air shipped 47,944 refrigerators and freezers. Of those, 227 were returned for freight damage. That is a claims ratio of 0.47% for our product which moves under item 53120. When this percentage is broken down by carrier, the majority of carriers have less than a 1% claims ratio (See graph below). The attached spreadsheet titled Damages & Claims provides the details of carrier returns.


of 6

Relationship to CCSB Policies and Guidelines Beverage Air doesn't have any problem with the "CCSB’s desire for uniformity, simplification, and clarification" as long as it doesn't negatively affect classification rates and drive freight costs upward in an unacceptable manner. As stated in your CCSB Docket 2014-3 Section 1, paragraph 3, CCSB policy that unusual or significant negative handling, stowability and liability, warrants the assignment of class 175 to account for the above. Beverage Air disputes this massive increase from class 110 to 175. It is shown in your findings that shippers who returned commodity questionnaires reported zero to 24 annual claims with a majority of high claims due to "non-complying packaging". As I have proven here, our packaging is compliant with or exceeds current NMFC standards and our claims ratio is less than what was reported by the CCSB analysis. Beverage Air disputes placing all manufacturers of this commodity into the same classification. Doing so would result in a 119% increase in our company’s freight costs just to achieve “simplification”. All manufacturers of this commodity are not diligently involved in preventing damages to their product while in transit. Monitoring company claim ratios, packaging development, pre-shipment testing, and the allocation of funds for these additional costs are all steps that Beverage Air has taken to exceed the shipping standards for our products. CCSB should recognize those manufacturers whose claim ratios reflect what your referenced "third carrier" reported a claims ratio of .09% and .61% for shipments moving under item 53120. If a change must be implemented, the classification of 53025 resulting in a 175 rate should only apply to high claims shippers and/or shippers with packaging that is considered non-compliant. This may be due to either nonconformance to the CCSB policies and/or not incurring the additional costs to ensure their


of 6

packaging is in compliance with handling protocols of the International Safe Transit Association test protocols. Shippers should benefit from applying these additional steps to verify packaging through testing and monitoring claims ratios with its carriers. Shippers should not be burdened with additional freight costs brought on by non-compliant shippers who fail to package their products according to the CCSB policies which only ensure low claims ratios and safe stowability. Summary The Beverage Air manufacturing facility is located in Brookville, Pennsylvania, a small town of just 4,000 people. We are the 2nd largest business in the area employing 300 people. For the past two years we have seen a moderate growth in sales. In the last twelve months we have hired 19 full time people and have purchased several new pieces of equipment (at a cost of $1.8 million) that has allowed us to maintain a competitive edge in this ever increasing global market and economy. Under our current tariffs with LTL carriers, our average freight cost is $0.21 per pound. By raising the classification to 175, this cost would increase to $0.46 a pound; an alarming increase of 119%. When analyzed in monetary terms, this comes to $2.3 million a year in additional freight costs. The significant increase in cost caused by changing item 513120 to class 175 would prevent my company from hiring additional employees or purchase new equipment. In turn, this would have an adverse effect on our ability to remain competitive within our industry. Sincerely, Stuart D. McNeill Distribution Manager Beverage Air Corp.

Date: Reference No.:

Lab: Lab Technician:

Address: Email:

City, State Zip: Phone Number:

Country: Signature:

Yes No xYes No xYes No x

II. Package Information

I. Product Information (including product name and model number)

BAC-006

Rob Reynolds

[email protected]

434-836-7818

LV-72 Three Door Refrigerated Cooler

National Motor Freight Classification - Item 180

Package Performance Laboratory Test Report

CCSB-Registered Testing Laboratory

Product / Package Information and Warehouse / Distribution Environment

3/10/2010

Multi-Wall Packaging Corporation

4010 Suburban Drive

Danville, Virginia 24540

USA

72

III. Warehouse / Distribution Environment

a. External container dimensions: b. Gross weight of packaged product: c. Sample size:

Wood Pallet - 35 x 78 - 4 way entry Corrugated Top Tray - 44C - 34 x 77 x 6 (4) 10 x 10 x 3/4 Thick

Multiwall Corrugated Angle Pads with Michelman Coating Inside (4) 24 x 78 x 3/4 Thick Honeycomb Panels

- 5/8 Cell - 33-33-33 (2) 6 x 78 x 3/4 Thick Honeycomb Panels - 5/8 Cell 33-33-33 Entire unit is stretch

wrapped in .080 Machine Stretch Wrap

34 1/2 x 77 x 84705 LBS

32 x 75 x 78 1/4 d. Description of packaging and/or palletizing (including interior packing forms):

b. Impact / Handling Testing

a. Compression / Vibration Testing (Continued)

a. Clamp Lifts: b. Basiloid Lifts: c. Hanging Conveyors:

IV. Description of Conditioning and Test Conditions

a. Average temperature: b. Average relative humidity:

Test Conditions and Procedure

c. Length of time under conditions:

V. Testing Performed (detailed description of test equipment used and test method followed)

a. Compression / Vibration Testing

i. Procedure (A)

i. Method (A)

Compression Tested @ 3749 lbs. Vibration Tested on Rotary Vibration Table utilizing Method B separate

vibration and separate compression

ii. Method (B)

78F50

ii. Procedure (B)

Impact Tested on Incline Tester Velocity= 5.75, largest faces (front/back) and next largest faces (end panels.

Rotational Edge Drop Test - 4 Drops 12" drop ASTM D6179

iii. Procedure (C)

No damage to packaged item. No damage to wood pallet.

Company Name: Contact Name:

Address: Email:


Country: USA

Shipper / Manufacturer

c. Concentrated Impact Testing

Ken Doverspike

Registration Number: 180-001

VIII. Attach photos of test specimen before and after testing.

Beverage Air

119 Progress Street

Brookville, PA 15825

[email protected]

814-849-2630

VI. Acceptance Criteria (full description of the test pass/fail criteria)

VII. Results of Test (condition of specimen after testing)

Unit passed testing with no damage to unit.



Address: Email:


Country: Signature:


ii. Procedure (B)

iii. Procedure (C)



Impact Tested on Incline Tester Velocity= 5.75 Impacts on largest faces (front and back) and impacts on next largest faces (end panels) Rotational Edge Drop Test - 4 Drops 12"

ii. Method (B)


78F50

c. Length of time under conditions: 72



i. Procedure (A)

i. Method (A)

Compression Tested @ 3670 Vibration Tested on Rotary Vibration Table utilizing Method B separate vibration and separate compression tests.







Wood Pallet - 30 x 43 - 4 way entry Corrugated Top Tray - 44C - 29 x 32 1/2 x 6 (4) 8 x 8 x 37 Thick Corrupad Corrugated Angle Pads with Michelman Coating Inside Entire unit is stretch wrapped in .080 Machine Stretch Wrap

29 1/2 x 35 1/2 x 42181 LBS

27 x 30 1/2 x 37 d. Description of packaging and/or palletizing (including interior packing forms):





3/10/2010


4010 Suburban Drive


USA



BAC-007

Rob Reynolds

[email protected]

434-836-7818

SPE-27 Sandwich Prep Elite

No damage to packaged itemNo damage to wood skid


Address: Email:


Country:


USA

814-849-2630



Ken Doverspike

[email protected]



Beverage Air

119 Progress Street





Address: Email:


Country: Signature:


ii. Procedure (B)

iii. Procedure (C)



Impact Tested on Incline Tester Velocity= 5.75 Impact on largest panels (front and back) impact on next largest panels (end panels) Rotational Edge Drop Test - 4 Drops 12" ASTM D6179

ii. Method (B)


78F50

c. Length of time under conditions: 72



i. Procedure (A)

i. Method (A)

Compression Tested @ 3789 Vibration Tested on Rotary Vibration Table utilizing Method B separate vibration and separate compression







Wood Pallet - 30 x 36 - 4 way entry Corrugated Top Tray - 44C - 29 x 35 1/2 x 6 (4) 8 x 8 x 37 Thick Corrupad Corrugated Angle Pads with Michelman Coating Inside Entire unit is stretch wrapped in .080 Machine Stretch Wrap

29 1/2 x 35 1/2 x 45 1/2196 LBS

27 x 34 x 40 d. Description of packaging and/or palletizing (including interior packing forms):





3/10/2010


4010 Suburban Drive


USA



BAC-008

Rob Reynolds

[email protected]

434-836-7818

SPE-27 -12 Mega Sandwich Prep Elite

No damage to packaged itemNo damage to wood skid


Address: Email:


Country:


USA

814-849-2630



Ken Doverspike

[email protected]



Beverage Air

119 Progress Street



January 1 - July 31, 2014Total Number units shipped 47,944

Total Units returned for freight damage 227Percentage Returned for freight damage 0.47%Claims Amount Submitted $150,513.19Claim Amount Paid thru July 31, 2014 $81,971.86

Date Returned Model # Weight Width Depth Height Carrier PRO# Dest. Reason ReturnedClaim

Amount

Amount

PaidStatus of Cooler

1/7/2014 SM58N-W-02 376 61.5 34 43.5 CONWAY 685727884 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $908.73 $908.73 Cosmetic Damage1/7/2014 BM23-B 178 27 32 43 PITT OHIO 99984968 PA FREIGHT DAMAGE $178.27 $110.77 Repaired as New1/8/2014 LV27-1-B 379 30 35 85 A. DUIE PYLE 278380845 NJ FREIGHT DAMAGE $609.15 $609.15 Cosmetic Damage1/8/2014 UCF27A 175 32 29.5 34 ESTES 210635053 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $616.97 $616.97 Cosmetic Damage1/9/2014 SMF58-S 500 61 36.5 52 CONWAY 685729004 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE $958.54 $958.54 Cosmetic Damage1/9/2014 UCF27A 175 32 29.5 34 CONWAY 685729004 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE $559.81 $559.81 Cosmetic Damage1/9/2014 UCR48A 245 51 32.25 35.5 CONWAY 685729004 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE $716.11 $716.11 Cosmetic Damage1/9/2014 WTR72AY 347 75 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 846149771 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $927.40 $797.41 Cosmetic Damage

1/10/2014 BM23-B 178 27 32 43 ESTES 2106350698 IA FREIGHT DAMAGE $197.01 $197.01 Repaired as New1/10/2014 LV27-1-B-LED 357 33 35 85.5 FEDEX FREIGHT 1613337810 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $824.33 $812.95 Cosmetic Damage1/10/2014 LV38-1-B-LED 456 46.5 35 85.5 FEDEX FREIGHT 1613337854 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,023.13 $0.00 Cosmetic Damage1/10/2014 SPE72-30M 452 75 32.25 46 FEDEX FREIGHT 1613337854 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,396.47 $1,383.49 Cosmetic Damage1/13/2014 WTR34Y 171 37 25.75 35.25 CONWAY 685727954 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $631.96 $0.00 Cosmetic Damage1/14/2014 LV23-1-B 368 39 27 85 YRC 6032882698 NM FREIGHT DAMAGE $596.74 $596.74 Cosmetic Damage1/14/2014 LV45-1-S 519 55 35 85.5 YRC 6032882698 NM FREIGHT DAMAGE $996.00 $0.00 Cosmetic Damage1/16/2014 WTRCS84-1 568 87 35 30.75 FEDEX FREIGHT 1613335356 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,579.50 $1,561.65 Cosmetic Damage1/16/2014 UCR27A 164 32 29.5 34 NEW PENN 846126381 WA FREIGHT DAMAGE $525.20 $380.19 Cosmetic Damage1/17/2014 LV45-1-W 530 55 35 85.5 CONWAY 685729181 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,201.95 $1,201.95 Cosmetic Damage1/20/2014 DW94-B 480 98 29 37 CONWAY 685728304 PA FREIGHT DAMAGE $847.86 $847.86 Cosmetic Damage1/20/2014 SPE48-18M 347 51 37 49.5 NEW PENN 846149953 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,266.42 $0.00 Scrapped1/21/2014 SPE60-24M-STL 397 63 32.25 46 PITT OHIO 5003483879 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,538.49 $1,463.17 Cosmetic Damage1/28/2014 DW49-B 282 53 29 38 A. DUIE PYLE 278380951 NJ FREIGHT DAMAGE $499.18 $499.18 Cosmetic Damage1/28/2014 BB78G-1-B 439 82 31 41 FEDEX FREIGHT 2561700470 MA FREIGHT DAMAGE $992.24 $984.04 Cosmetic Damage1/29/2014 HR1-1HS 324 41 33 87 ABF 298230049 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $624.70 $0.00 Cosmetic Damage1/30/2014 BM23-S-31 178 27 32 43 ESTES 210635191 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $710.90 $710.90 Cosmetic Damage1/31/2014 UCF20 114 23 23.5 35 ESTES 210635175 CO FREIGHT DAMAGE $491.71 $491.71 Cosmetic Damage1/31/2014 LV72Y-1-W 716 78 35 85.5 NEW PENN 849588116 VA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,109.58 $968.61 Cosmetic Damage2/3/2014 VM18-1-G-LED 648 54 34 83 CONWAY 685726031 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,500.29 $1,500.29 Cosmetic Damage2/3/2014 LV12-1-B-CJR 236 27 27 68 UPS FRT 767649374 NC FREIGHT DAMAGE $452.50 $452.50 Cosmetic Damage2/4/2014 HF1-1HS-SONIC 344 41 33 87 CONWAY 685726355 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,079.88 $1,079.88 Cosmetic Damage2/4/2014 DW49-B 282 53 29 38 ESTES 210635177 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $553.47 $553.47 Cosmetic Damage2/4/2014 DW79-B 399 83 29 38 ESTES 210635177 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $752.63 $752.63 Cosmetic Damage2/7/2014 KR48-1AS/ 479 34 57 84 CONWAY 810331336 SC FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,614.00 $0.00 Scrapped

2/10/2014 CDR6/1-B-20 696 76 38 50 A. DUIE PYLE 278386719 MD FREIGHT DAMAGE $2,161.02 $2,161.02 Cosmetic Damage2/12/2014 UCR27A 164 32 29.5 34 NEW PENN 849605258 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $577.60 $519.42 Cosmetic Damage2/12/2014 WTF27A 177 30 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 849605258 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $641.45 $576.84 Cosmetic Damage2/12/2014 WTR48A 253 51 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 849605258 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $755.32 $679.24 Cosmetic Damage2/14/2014 BB48GY-1-B-27 306 51 27 38 PITT OHIO 5003483966 IL FREIGHT DAMAGE $207.57 $140.07 Repaired as New2/14/2014 LV17-1-B 314 39 27 85 UPS FRT 767649455 KY FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $0.00 Cosmetic Damage2/17/2014 LV10-1-B 220 27 29 85 ESTES 210635270 WI FREIGHT DAMAGE $514.35 $514.35 Cosmetic Damage2/20/2014 UCF48A-23 245 51 32.25 38.5 PITT OHIO 5003483977 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $169.87 $102.37 Repaired as New2/21/2014 CT96-1-B 170 24 28 41 PITT OHIO 5003483846 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $0.00 Cosmetic Damage2/24/2014 BB48GSYDF1BPT 306 51 27 38 NEW PENN 849587233 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $0.00 Repaired as New2/24/2014 UCR27A 164 32 29.5 34 NEW PENN 849587233 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $556.36 $426.36 Cosmetic Damage2/27/2014 DW94-B 480 98 29 37 FEDEX FREIGHT 2561698086 NV FREIGHT DAMAGE $906.63 $906.63 Cosmetic Damage2/27/2014 UCR72AY-23 325 75 32 38 FEDEX FREIGHT 2561698090 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $922.44 $899.91 Cosmetic Damage2/28/2014 BB72GSY-1-PT-B/Z-27 404 75 26 38 CONWAY 685728746 NE FREIGHT DAMAGE $329.66 $329.66 Repaired as New3/3/2014 SPE60-16 405 63 32.25 46 ESTES 210635274 WA FREIGHT DAMAGE $815.03 $815.03 Cosmetic Damage3/4/2014 HBF72-1 771 78 37 87 FEDEX FREIGHT 2561700831 AZ FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,596.10 $1,596.10 Cosmetic Damage3/4/2014 MMF49-1-B 596 55 36.75 82 NEW PENN 849579750 NY FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,589.84 $1,459.85 Cosmetic Damage3/4/2014 ST34N-W-02 258 37 34.5 43.5 NEW PENN 849579826 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $795.60 $770.60 Cosmetic Damage3/4/2014 ST49N-S 323 52 34.5 43.5 NEW PENN 849600069 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $996.41 $827.39 Cosmetic Damage3/6/2014 UCR27A-24-23 170 32 29.5 34 FEDEX FREIGHT 2561700875 AZ FREIGHT DAMAGE $536.91 $531.14 Cosmetic Damage3/6/2014 HF1-1HS-SONIC 344 41 33 87 NEW PENN 849605605 MI FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,040.12 $904.69 Cosmetic Damage3/7/2014 LV10-1-B-LED-002 220 27 29 85 ESTES 210644643 IL FREIGHT DAMAGE $590.23 $590.23 Cosmetic Damage

3/11/2014 WTF60AY 340 63 33 36 FEDEX FREIGHT 2561691414 WI FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,839.90 $0.00 Scrapped3/18/2014 BZ13-1-W 323 33 35 58 NEW PENN 846149961 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,083.99 $953.99 Cosmetic Damage3/19/2014 VM18-1-B-LED 645 54 34 83 A. DUIE PYLE 278236484 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,484.47 $1,484.47 Repaired as New3/19/2014 CT96-1-B 170 24 28 41 FEDEX FREIGHT 2561700945 AZ FREIGHT DAMAGE $410.09 $0.00 Cosmetic Damage3/20/2014 STF49Y-1-S 400 52 36.5 52 YRC 6032911426 WA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,080.39 $1,050.39 Cosmetic Damage3/21/2014 KR48-1AS/ 479 34 57 84 CONWAY 685725725 GA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,066.74 $1,066.74 Cosmetic Damage3/21/2014 BB78-1-B 439 82 31 41 ESTES 210654489 SC FREIGHT DAMAGE $329.40 $329.40 Repaired as New3/21/2014 WTR48A-23 235 51 32.25 43.5 PITT OHIO 5003484024 IL FREIGHT DAMAGE $509.40 $509.40 Repaired as New3/24/2014 UCF27A-24 175 32 29.5 34 CONWAY 685725773 TN FREIGHT DAMAGE $606.09 $606.09 Cosmetic Damage3/24/2014 KR48-1AS/ 479 34 57 84 ESTES 210654483 SC FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,056.80 $1,056.80 Cosmetic Damage

Beverage Air Units Returned Due to Freight Damage


Amount

Amount


3/25/2014 DD94-1-B 478 98 31 41 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860561616 WA FREIGHT DAMAGE $996.44 $996.44 Cosmetic Damage3/26/2014 BB48Y-1-B-27 306 51 27 38 CONWAY 685725596 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $835.44 $835.44 Cosmetic Damage3/26/2014 UCR27A-24-23-225 164 32 29.5 34 ESTES 210654637 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $739.31 $739.31 Scrapped3/27/2014 KF24-1AS/ 299 34 29 84 PITT OHIO 5003489606 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $895.02 Cosmetic Damage4/1/2014 SMF58-S 500 61 36.5 52 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860561664 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,012.96 $1,012.96 Cosmetic Damage4/1/2014 DW94-B 480 98 29 37 NEW PENN 849578463 MN FREIGHT DAMAGE $243.93 $175.19 Cosmetic Damage4/1/2014 DW94-B 480 98 29 37 NEW PENN 849578463 MN FREIGHT DAMAGE $786.75 $565.05 Cosmetic Damage4/3/2014 ST34N-S 267 37 34.5 43.5 ESTES 210654350 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $842.27 $842.77 Cosmetic Damage4/3/2014 WTRD27A-2 164 30 32.25 43.5 UPS FRT 730402820 NJ FREIGHT DAMAGE $701.57 $676.57 Cosmetic Damage4/4/2014 DD94-1-B 478 98 31 41 CONWAY 685725821 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $299.45 $299.45 Repaired as New4/4/2014 GF48L-B 292 51 29 38 CONWAY 685725821 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $753.48 $753.48 Cosmetic Damage4/4/2014 BB94G-1-B 554 98 31 41 YRC 6032911518 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $899.98 $899.98 Cosmetic Damage4/8/2014 HR2-1S 506 55 35 87 CONWAY 892944710 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,868.32 $1,868.324/8/2014 UCR27A 164 32 29.5 34 CONWAY 892944522 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $722.64 $722.64 Scrapped4/8/2014 WTR48A 253 51 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 849578554 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $242.30 $193.45 Repaired as New4/8/2014 CF3-1-W 165 26 27 30 YRC 6032913103 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $536.34 $536.34 Cosmetic Damage4/9/2014 KF48-1AS/ 494 34 57 84 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860563064 NM FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,313.03 $1,313.03 Cosmetic Damage

4/11/2014 KR24-1AS/ 394 34 29 84 ESTES 210643563 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $888.83 $875.32 Cosmetic Damage4/14/2014 DW79-B 399 83 29 38 ESTES 210654367 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $777.37 $777.37 Cosmetic Damage4/14/2014 BM23-B 178 27 32 43 OLD DOMINION 32700621751 PA FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $0.00 Repaired as New4/16/2014 LV45-1-W-009 519 55 35 85.5 ABF 298230623 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $932.70 $0.00 Cosmetic Damage4/16/2014 KF48-1AS/ 494 34 57 84 CONWAY 892944975 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $2,052.32 $2,052.32 Scrapped4/17/2014 SPE60-24M 405 63 32.25 46 CONWAY 892944942 AL FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,051.66 $1,051.66 Cosmetic Damage4/17/2014 KF48-1AS/ 494 34 57 84 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860563462 NM FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,452.12 $1,429.78 Cosmetic Damage4/17/2014 CT96-1-B 170 24 28 41 R AND L 380236221 WA FREIGHT DAMAGE $454.55 Cosmetic Damage4/21/2014 BB48GSYD1PT 306 51 27 38 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860563930 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,645.27 $1,636.93 Scrapped4/21/2014 CDR5/1-B-20 615 64 38 50 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860563930 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $2,090.65 $2,080.05 Cosmetic Damage4/21/2014 NC51-1-W 201 53.64 28 40 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860563930 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $548.77 $545.99 Cosmetic Damage4/21/2014 HF1-1HS-SNS 344 41 33 87 PITT OHIO 5003489668 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $963.62 $896.12 Cosmetic Damage4/22/2014 LV72Y-1-W 716 78 35 85.5 CONWAY 892945454 IL FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $0.00 Scrapped4/22/2014 BB68-1-B 359 62 31 41 NEW PENN 849590179 WA FREIGHT DAMAGE $277.20 Repaired as New4/22/2014 BZ13-1-W 323 33 35 58 NEW PENN 849580220 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $0.00 Repaired as New4/23/2014 WTRF50A-1-SA-A 307 52 32 43.5 ESTES 210647685 NC FREIGHT DAMAGE $953.40 Cosmetic Damage4/23/2014 UCR48A-23 238 51 32.25 35.5 PITT OHIO 5003489684 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $693.20 $625.70 Cosmetic Damage4/28/2014 BB58-1-B 359 62 31 41 CONWAY 892945082 MN FREIGHT DAMAGE $282.63 $282.63 Repaired as New4/28/2014 BB72Y-1-B 404 75 26 38 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860563834 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $283.97 $272.46 Repaired as New4/30/2014 BZ13-1-B-VAL 323 33 35 58 CONWAY 892945863 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $958.82 $958.82 Cosmetic Damage4/30/2014 BM23-B 178 27 32 43 PITT OHIO 5003489738 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $552.47 Cosmetic Damage4/30/2014 WTR48A 253 51 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853831899 UT FREIGHT DAMAGE $805.46 Cosmetic Damage4/30/2014 DD58-1-B 348 62 31 41 YRC 6032913727 WI FREIGHT DAMAGE $145.00 $0.00 Repaired as New5/5/2014 WTRD27A-2 164 30 32.25 43.5 CONWAY 892945841 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $701.57 Cosmetic Damage5/5/2014 HF3-5S 732 80 36 87 NEW PENN 849589189 WA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,840.91 $1,681.70 Cosmetic Damage5/6/2014 WTR60A 306 63 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853832236 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $845.94 $705.28 Cosmetic Damage5/7/2014 BB72GSY-1-B-27 404 75 26 38 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860568476 ID FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,168.95 Repaired as New5/7/2014 HF2-1S-003 532 55 32 87 NEW PENN 853831527 OR FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,427.08 $1,248.84 Cosmetic Damage5/9/2014 LV72Y-1-B 709 78 35 85.5 A. DUIE PYLE 278230073 NY FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,133.32 $1,133.32 Cosmetic Damage

5/12/2014 DW79-B 399 83 29 38 YRC 6032913718 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $746.61 $746.61 Cosmetic Damage5/12/2014 SPE27-24 196 30 32.25 45.5 YRC 6032840732 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $396.10 $393.10 Cosmetic Damage5/13/2014 DW79-B 399 83 29 38 ESTES 210657262 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $837.88 $823.81 Cosmetic Damage5/13/2014 DD24-1-S 174 31 26 45 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860569224 AR FREIGHT DAMAGE $326.13 Repaired as New5/13/2014 UCF27A 175 32 29.5 34 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860569014 AZ FREIGHT DAMAGE $659.88 $659.88 Cosmetic Damage5/13/2014 UCR27A-09-17 164 32 29.5 34 UPS FRT 767650015 OR FREIGHT DAMAGE $572.78 $572.78 Cosmetic Damage5/19/2014 BB68G-1-B-L 385 72 31 41 CONWAY 892944555 SC FREIGHT DAMAGE $2,459.51 Scrapped5/19/2014 UCF27-23 162 32 29.5 34 FEDEX FREIGHT 1613336594 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $630.47 Cosmetic Damage5/20/2014 BM23-B 178 27 32 43 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860569655 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $545.18 $544.11 Cosmetic Damage5/20/2014 DD78-1-B 424 82 31 41 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860569655 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,042.26 $1,040.20 Cosmetic Damage5/20/2014 DD48Y-1-B 284 51 26 40 PITT OHIO 5003489790 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $869.01 Cosmetic Damage5/21/2014 SPE48-12 314 51 32.25 45 NEW PENN 853832475 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $867.18 Cosmetic Damage5/21/2014 SPE60-10 347 63 32.25 46 NEW PENN 853832475 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $911.23 Cosmetic Damage5/21/2014 WTF48A 269 30 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853832475 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $866.70 Cosmetic Damage5/21/2014 WTR72AY 347 75 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853832475 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $948.54 Cosmetic Damage5/21/2014 WTR72AY 347 75 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853832475 CANADA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,007.28 Cosmetic Damage5/22/2014 DP119 699 122 39 47 ROADRUNNER 295084891B NM FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage5/23/2014 SMF58-S 500 61 36.5 52 ESTES 210657247 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $390.25 Repaired as New5/23/2014 DD48Y-1-B 284 51 26 40 PITT OHIO 5003489810 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $248.63 Repaired as New5/23/2014 SPE60-24M-006 397 63 32.25 46 PITT OHIO 5003489789 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage5/27/2014 SPE48-12 314 51 32.25 45 NEW PENN 853803401 NJ FREIGHT DAMAGE $704.95 $561.36 Cosmetic Damage5/28/2014 DD48Y-1-B 284 51 26 40 PITT OHIO 5003489804 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $248.63 Repaired as New5/28/2014 DD58-1-B 348 62 31 41 PITT OHIO 5003489818 PA FREIGHT DAMAGE $765.57 Cosmetic Damage5/28/2014 HF1-1HS-SNS 344 41 33 87 PITT OHIO 5003489826 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,004.33 Cosmetic Damage5/28/2014 SPE27-12M-B-SNS 210 30 37 49.5 PITT OHIO 5003489826 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $650.02 Cosmetic Damage5/28/2014 SPED72-24M-4-073 442 75 32.25 46 PITT OHIO 5003489826 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $2,495.58 Scrapped5/29/2014 DD94-1-B 478 98 31 41 NEW PENN 8495888967 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,148.90 Repaired as New5/30/2014 CTR3-1-B-LED 170 24 28 41 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860570694 AR FREIGHT DAMAGE $663.56 Scrapped5/30/2014 RI18-HGS-26/ 327 35 30 75 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860570602 VA FREIGHT DAMAGE $661.03 Cosmetic Damage


Amount

Amount


6/2/2014 KR24-1AS/ 394 34 29 84 ESTES 210682851 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $862.45 Cosmetic Damage6/3/2014 BB78G-1-B 439 82 31 41 CONWAY 892946471 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE $3,016.78 Scrapped6/3/2014 SMF58-S 500 61 36.5 52 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860570285 NM FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,236.63 $1,233.33 Cosmetic Damage6/3/2014 SPE72-30M-STL 455 75 32.25 46 PITT OHIO 5003489841 MI FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/4/2014 HRS2-1G 791 81 35 87 ESTES 210682881 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/4/2014 HR3-1S 791 80 38 87 YRC 6032830273 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,318.31 Cosmetic Damage6/5/2014 UCR34Y 164 37 23 35 PITT OHIO 5003489822 PA FREIGHT DAMAGE $875.52 Repaired as New6/5/2014 UCR27A-23 164 32 29.5 34 NEW PENN 853803419 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $530.93 Cosmetic Damage6/9/2014 KF48-1AS/ 494 34 57 84 A 298230582 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $0.00 Scrapped6/9/2014 LV23-1-B-180 368 39 27 85 CONWAY 810331476 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE $905.72 Cosmetic Damage6/9/2014 UCR20Y-24-23 107 23 23 35 PITT OHIO 5003489867 MI FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New

6/10/2014 UCR48A 245 51 32.25 35.5 NEW PENN 853843118 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/10/2014 WTR60A 306 63 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853843118 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $838.91 Cosmetic Damage6/12/2014 BM23-S-31 178 27 32 43 ESTES 210682913 NC FREIGHT DAMAGE $576.28 Cosmetic Damage6/13/2014 SPE60-16 405 63 32.25 46 ESTES 210682945 SC FREIGHT DAMAGE $936.12 Cosmetic Damage6/13/2014 UCR27A-23 164 32 29.5 34 ESTES 210682945 SC FREIGHT DAMAGE $545.50 Cosmetic Damage6/16/2014 HR1-1S-18 324 41 33 87 CONWAY 82944754 MS FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/16/2014 DD94-1-B-144 478 98 31 41 ESTES 2240687056 CO FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,336.96 Cosmetic Damage6/16/2014 LV27-1-B 379 33 35 85.5 YRC 6032820447 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/18/2014 DD58-1-B 348 62 31 41 FEDEX FREIGHT 3366378072 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $748.05 Cosmetic Damage6/18/2014 HF2-1S 532 55 32 87 FEDEX FREIGHT 2860571486 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $2,098.31 Cosmetic Damage6/19/2014 UCR20Y 113 23 23 35 NEW PENN 853832939 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/24/2014 WTRCS112-1 772 123 35 30.75 PITT OHIO 5003489970 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $2,062.11 Cosmetic Damage6/24/2014 WTRCS112-1 772 123 35 30.75 PITT OHIO 5003489986 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $351.63 Repaired as New6/24/2014 DD78-1-B 424 82 31 41 NEW PENN 853842573 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $349.20 Repaired as New6/25/2014 SPE72-30M 452 75 32.25 46 NEW PENN 853833077 AZ FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/26/2014 BB94G-1-B 554 98 31 41 FEDEX FREIGHT 3366377921 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/27/2014 HF3-5S 732 80 36 87 ADUIE PYLE 278227559 NJ FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,420.27 Cosmetic Damage6/27/2014 BB78G-1-B 439 82 31 41 ESTES 210657191 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE $3,016.78 Scrapped6/27/2014 DW94-B-29 480 98 29 37 ESTES 210683099 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,298.89 Cosmetic Damage6/27/2014 BB48GY-1-B 306 51 27 38 PITT OHIO 5003489974 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New6/27/2014 SPE72-30M 452 75 32.25 46 PITT OHIO 5003489974 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New6/27/2014 VM18-1-G-LED 648 54 34 83 PITT OHIO 5003489974 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage6/27/2014 WMBC220C-POD 1345 60.9 52 105 R AND L 380236869 MN FREIGHT DAMAGE6/27/2014 DD94-1-B 478 98 31 41 NEW PENN 849588744 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,104.90 Cosmetic Damage6/27/2014 WTF27A 177 30 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853843258 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $626.93 Cosmetic Damage6/30/2014 DD58-1-B 348 62 31 41 ESTES 210683114 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE $824.86 Cosmetic Damage6/30/2014 DP67 449 70 39 47 NEW PENN 853823078 MA FREIGHT DAMAGE $255.88 Repaired as New7/2/2014 DD48Y-1-B-079 284 51 26 40 CONWAY 892864210 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/2/2014 UCR27A-23 164 32 29.5 34 CONWAY 892864291 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New7/2/2014 BB48GSY-1-B-27 306 51 27 38 NEW PENN 849589312 WA FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New7/2/2014 CT96-1-B-LED 170 24 28 41 NEW PENN 853823466 NY FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/2/2014 WTR48A 253 51 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853794154 UT FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/2/2014 SPE48-08C 320 51 32.25 45.69 YRC 6032821143 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $164.72 Repaired as New7/7/2014 BZ13-1-B-VAL 323 33 35 58 CONWAY 892863602 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/8/2014 DW94-B 480 98 29 37 FEDEX FREIGHT 3366376425 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/8/2014 SMF58-W 484 61 36.5 52 YRC 6033012177 KY FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/9/2014 ST34N-S 267 37 34.5 43.5 COMWAY 892864361 NC FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/9/2014 ST34N-S 267 37 34.5 43.5 CONWAY 892864361 NC FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New

7/10/2014 SPE72-30M 452 75 32.25 46 ABF 298230798 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $297.02 Cosmetic Damage7/10/2014 VM18-1-G-LED 648 54 34 83 ABF 298230798 IN FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $297.02 Cosmetic Damage7/10/2014 DW79-B 399 83 29 38 FEDEX FREIGHT 3366376543 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/10/2014 LV27-1-B 379 33 35 85.5 FEDEX FREIGHT 3366376543 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE Scrapped7/10/2014 HR1-1S 324 41 33 87 PITT OHIO 5003490036 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $801.88 Cosmetic Damage7/10/2014 HRS2-1G-006 791 81 35 87 NEW PENN 853832442 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,458.54 Cosmetic Damage7/14/2014 HR2-1S 506 55 35 87 ADUIE PYLE 278219563 NJ FREIGHT DAMAGE $221.19 Cosmetic Damage7/15/2014 DW64-B 343 68 29 38 ABF 298230783 ID FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $297.02 Scrapped7/15/2014 LV12-1-W-009 236 27 27 68 ABF 298230897 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $0.00 $297.02 Cosmetic Damage7/15/2014 DD48Y-1-B-079 284 51 26 40 CONWAY 892863731 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New7/15/2014 DW79-B 399 83 29 38 NEW PENN 853794204 AZ FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New7/15/2014 HF2-1S 532 55 32 87 NEW PENN 853822435 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,515.77 Cosmetic Damage7/17/2014 WTF27A 177 30 32.25 43.5 CONWAY 892863624 OK FREIGHT DAMAGE $754.97 Cosmetic Damage7/17/2014 WTRD60A-2 271 63 32.25 43.5 FEDEX FREIGHT 3366376580 CO FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/17/2014 UCR48A-23 238 51 32.25 35.5 PITT OHIO 5003490044 OH FREIGHT DAMAGE $679.60 Cosmetic Damage7/18/2014 BB36G-1-B 227 39 27 33 ADUIE PYLE 278232897 NY FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New7/18/2014 DP93 580 96 39 47 ESTES 210683287 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE Scrapped7/18/2014 SM49N-W 339 52.5 34 43.5 ESTES 210683287 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/18/2014 SPE27 196 30 32.25 45.5 ESTES 210683287 LA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/18/2014 HF2-1S 532 55 32 87 FEDEX FREIGHT 3366378282 NM FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/18/2014 BB48GYF-1-S-LED 306 51 27 38 NEW PENN 853821866 MA FREIGHT DAMAGE Repaired as New7/21/2014 SMF49Y-1-W 437 52 36.5 52 ESTES 210670331 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $729.17 Cosmetic Damage7/22/2014 BB94-1-B 486 98 31 41 ESTES 210670346 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Scrapped7/22/2014 DP119 699 122 39 47 FEDEX FREIGHT 3366376020 IL FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/23/2014 BB94G-1-B 554 98 31 41 OLD DOMINION 32700630240 GA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/23/2014 DD94-1-B 478 98 31 41 ROAD RUNNER 295101836B TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage


Amount

Amount


7/24/2014 KR24-1AS/ 394 34 29 84 ESTES 210683223 GA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/24/2014 SPE60-24M-STL 397 63 32.25 46 NEW PENN 853833366 NY FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/25/2014 LV45-1-B 532 55 35 85.5 CONWAY 892947392 TX FREIGHT DAMAGE Scrapped7/25/2014 BB36G-1-B 227 39 27 33 YRC 6033008244 NY FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/28/2014 UCR27A 164 32 29.5 34 NEW PENN 853833275 NY FREIGHT DAMAGE $512.76 Cosmetic Damage7/29/2014 LV12-1-B-002 236 27 27 68 ESTES 210670473 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE $1,375.30 Scrapped7/29/2014 HBR23-1-18 400 30 37 87 NEW PENN 853822260 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/29/2014 ST49N-W 335 52 34.5 43.5 NEW PENN 853841617 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/29/2014 STF58Y-1-S 491 61 36.5 52 NEW PENN 853822690 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/31/2014 SPE48-12-182 314 51 32.25 45 ESTES 210670563 FL FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/31/2014 SPE72-30M 452 75 32.25 46 ESTES 210670443 VA FREIGHT DAMAGE Cosmetic Damage7/31/2014 WTF27A 177 30 32.25 43.5 NEW PENN 853841989 CA FREIGHT DAMAGE $225.27 Repaired as New

SUPPLEMENT 5 TO NMF 100-AI

RULES

Only participants in the NMFC at the time the transportation occurs may use the provisions herein.For explanation of abbreviations and reference marks, see last page of this Supplement. ©NMFTA 2009 13

ITEM 180-A-ContinuedSection VI. Acceptance Criteria

(1) The shipping unit shall be deemed acceptable after performance testing if the following criteria are met:(a) The article is neither damaged nor nonfunctional.(b) The shipping unit has maintained its integrity and still affords reasonable protection against the normal rigors of transportation.

(2) The acceptance criteria of article damage and nonfunctionality must be predetermined before testing and included in the report.Section VII. Certification

(1) Packages tested in accordance with this rule and certified as such by the Commodity Classification Standards Board’s (CCSB’s) PackagingConsultant must conspicuously bear the following triangular symbol that is 3 in wide at the top and 3.75 in high, showing that they meet the minimumperformance requirements specified. This marking is the responsibility of the shipper or testing laboratory as identified above the symbol by name, cityand state. Testing must be conducted by a testing laboratory that is registered with the CCSB, see Note 7.

(2) Directly above each certification symbol there must be printed a CCSB Performance Test Registration Number. Such number will be issued onan annual basis by the CCSB upon receipt of a properly completed form requesting such a Registration Number, signed by the CCSB’s PackagingConsultant or other CCSB member and certifying that the symbol and Registration Number will be imprinted only on those packages which have metthe minimum performance test requirements specified. Further, the applicant must divulge on the form the location or locations where completed testreport forms are available for inspection upon reasonable request.

(a) In the event of a damage claim, carriers may request a retest at a different CCSB-registered laboratory (see Note 7). The retest must beconducted according to the same test plan as was used for the certification testing; no alternative procedures or types of test equipment may besubstituted. Should the shipping unit fail the retest, a second retest of two shipping units may be conducted at the second laboratory and both shippingunits must pass the retest.

(b) All shipping unit configurations and article sizes and variations must be tested and new reports filed for the purpose of certification by thisrule (see Note 6). Any time a packaging or product change is made, the required performance tests must be repeated.

(c) When minor variations are made in articles, a single test sequence may be performed for certification, provided the variations have noeffect on the degree of protective packaging required. Examples of minor variations may be color differences, electrical voltage/wiring, or lefthand/right hand.

NOTE 6—When the shipping unit certified is a palletized load or a unitized load, the packaged products in the load are not certified as individualshipping units unless they are also successfully tested as individual packages and are so certified. Such palletized or unitized loads must show thetriangular certification symbol on an upper position of not less than one sidewall.

NOTE 7—To qualify as a third party laboratory, the facility must register on an annual basis with the CCSB. A list of registered third partylaboratories is provided in Item 183. For the most up-to-date list of registered labs, please refer to the CCSB's website, www.nmfta.org. Shippers within-house laboratories that test their own products must also register on an annual basis with the CCSB.

]ITEM 181-AFURNITURE PACKAGE PERFORMANCE TESTING

This rule provides an alternative to: Item 180; the Test Shipment Permit Program (Item 689); packaging provisions as found within the FurnitureGroup, item 79000 and the Furniture Parts Group, item 82750; and separate Numbered Packages, including the "F" and "S" Packages. It isrecommended for solving chronic damage problems and for providing an acceptable assurance level of packaging for articles of furniture. This testprocedure is to represent normal handling and distribution of boxed furniture or furniture parts. This rule does not purport to address all of the safetyissues, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this rule to establish appropriate safety and health practices.

This test procedure does not apply to packages utilizing stretch or shrink plastic film wrap-style shipping units. This procedure appliesonly to furniture that is fully contained within corrugated fibreboard shipping containers. Exceptions include corrugated fibreboard flanged,open-bottom containers only when the container is appropriately marked with UP arrows. Furniture tendered in a corrugated fibreboardcontainer secured on a lift truck skid or pallet, or with a lift truck skid or pallet base, should be tested under Item 180.

In order to qualify as authorized methods of packaging under this rule, shipping containers must be preshipment tested and successfully pass thefollowing prescribed performance test requirements and must meet the acceptance criteria as indicated.


RULES

















RULES

















RULES

Only participants in the NMFC at the time the transportation occurs may use the provisions herein.18 For explanation of abbreviations and reference marks, see last page of this Supplement. ©NMFTA 2009

ITEM 181-A-ContinuedSection V. Acceptance Criteria


(2) The acceptance criteria of article damage and nonfunctionality must be predetermined before testing and included in the report.Section VI. Certification

(1) Packages tested in accordance with this rule and certified as such by the Commodity Classification Standards Board’s (CCSB’s) PackagingConsultant must conspicuously bear the following octagonal symbol that is 3 in by 3 in showing that they meet the minimum performance requirementsspecified, see Note 8. This marking is the responsibility of the shipper or CCSB-registered testing laboratory, identified within the symbol by name, cityand state. Testing must be conducted by the shipper on their own products or by any CCSB-registered testing laboratory, see Note 9.


NOTE 8—The use of the above certification symbol does not negate container marking required in Note, item 79022, paragraph (c).(3) In the event of repeated damages, carriers may request a retest at a CCSB-registered laboratory. The retest must be conducted according to

the same test plan as used for the initial certification testing. No alternative procedures or types of test equipment may be substituted. Should theshipping unit fail the retest, a second retest of two shipping units may be conducted at a CCSB-registered laboratory and both shipping units mustpass the retest.


ITEM 183-CCCSB-REGISTERED THIRD PARTY PACKAGE TESTING LABORATORIES

The package testing laboratories named below are registered with the Commodity Classification Standards Board and are qualified to conduct theperformance test procedures detailed in Items 180 and 181. For the most up-to-date list of registered labs, please refer to the CCSB’s website,www.nmfta.org.

Laboratory Location Contact Phone Number

Advance Packaging Corp. Grand Rapids, MI Scott Wilcox 619.949.8019

Advanced Packaging Technology Laboratories Wheeling, IL Anthony White 847.520.4343

Beacon Container Corp. Birdsboro, PA Ron Bevan 610.582.2222

Bureau Veritas Hong Kong Ltd. Shenzhen, Guangdong, China Wingo Chee 86.755.86000151

DDL, Inc. Eden Prairie, MN Scott Levy 952.941.9226

DDL, Inc. Edison, NJ Peter Johnson 732.346.9200

DDL, Inc. Fountain Valley, CA Mike Foster 714.979.1712

gh Package & Product Testing & Consulting, Inc. Fairfield, OH H. Perry Hock 513.870.0080


RULES






















RULES






















RULES


ITEM 183-C-Continued


gh Package & Product Testing & Consulting of Arizona, Inc. Phoenix, AZ Mike Greer 623.869.8008

Intertek Testing Services Shenzhen Ltd. Shenzhen, China Victor T.J. Wang 86.755.26020111

Micom Laboratories, Inc. Dorval, Quebec, Canada Michel Comtois 514.633.0078

Multi-Wall Packaging Corp. Danville, VA Jasper Peters 434.836.7800

North American Container Corp. Marietta, GA Charles Grigsby 770.431.4858

Packaging Corporation of America Mundelein, IL Michael Gilgenbach 847.482.2099

Packaging Technology Center, Inc. Houston, TX Thomas Schneider 713.670.7309

Performance Testing Labs, LLC Orange, CA Mary Beth Proctor 714.997.9830

Piedmont Packaging, Inc. High Point, NC Gregory Peterson 336.886.4187

Pira International Huntington Beach, CA Andrew Volmensky 714.892.9747

Pira International Lansing, MI Bill Hughes 517.322.2400

Pira International Sunnyvale, CA Tramy Lieu 408.734.9724

Pro-Pack Testing Laboratory, Inc. Belleville, IL Manuel Rosa, Jr. 618.277.1160

R@K Testing Massillon, OH Rich Kovaleski 740.624.1314

Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY Tom Kausch 585.475.2608

Rock-Tenn Company Norcross, GA Steve Johnson 678.291.7440

Sealed Air Packaging Design & Development Center Chula Vista, CA Devin Ridgeway 619.421.9003

Sealed Air Packaging Design & Development Center City of Industry, CA Seth Keaveny 909.594.1791

Sealed Air Packaging Design & Development Center Danbury, CT Colvin Allen 203.791.3656

Sealed Air Packaging Design & Development Center Fort Worth, TX David Hagood 817.540.2020

Sealed Air Packaging Design & Development Center Hodgkins, IL Kevin Dabrowski 708.352.8700

Sealed Air Packaging Design & Development Center Hudson, NC Bill Norberg 828.728.8500

Sealed Air Packaging Design & Development Center Saddle Brook, NJ Eric Bunn 201.712.2000

Sealed Air Packaging Design & Development Center Sharonville, OH Ben Ritchie 513.672.3441

SGS U.S. Testing Co., Inc. Fairfield, NJ Leon Venech 973.461.7920

SGS-CSTC Standards Technical Services Co., Ltd. Guangdong Province, China Jack Yao 86.0.757.2280.5851

Smurfit-Stone Research & Development Center Carol Stream, IL Richard Thomas 630.384.5244

Sonoco Products Co. – Protective Packaging Div. Nashville, TN Jim Baechle 615.744.2429

Temple-Inland, Inc. Indianapolis, IN John Rutherford 317.875.4130

TEN-E Packaging Services, Inc. Newport, MN Susan Hauge 651.459.0671

TEN-E Packaging Services, Inc. Ontario, CA Matt Anderson 909.937.1260

The Testing Lab of China Packaging Research & Test Center Tianjin, China Wang Qing 86.22.66231629

Thomson Lab Services Indianapolis, IN Roland Uhrick 317.587.5196

TUV SUD PSB Pte Ltd. Singapore Neo Eng Lai 65.68851437

Unicor – Product Support Center – Furniture Littleton, CO Doug Gesner 303.980.2312

UPS Customer Solutions Package Design and Test Lab Addison, IL Patrick McDavid 877.877.7229

NMFC Item 180 Certified Packaged Products

CCSB Registered Testing Lab Jasper Peters Multi-Wall Packaging Corp. 4010 Suburban Dr. Danville, VA 24540

Manufacturer

Ken Doverspike Beverage-Air Company

119 Progress St. Brookville, PA 15825

Shipper Registration Number: 180-001

12/14/2009 This letter hereby certifies that the following articles have successfully passed the National Motor Freight Classification Item 180 test procedure, as completed by Multi-Wall Packaging Corp. This test procedure is not a guarantee against damage during handling and stowing.

Article Test Date Lab Reference Number SM49N-W (9303279) 12/4/2009 BAC-002

All questions regarding this letter should be directed to [email protected]. Sincerely, Erin N. Topper Member / Packaging Consultant Commodity Classification Standards Board


CCSB Registered Testing Lab Jasper Peters Multi-Wall Packaging Corp. 4010 Suburban Dr. Danville, VA 24540

Manufacturer

Ken Doverspike Beverage Air




Article Test Date Lab Reference Number SM34-N 12/29/2009 BAC-004 BZ-13 1/12/2010 BAC-005

SM58-N 12/29/2009 BAC-003



CCSB Registered Testing Lab Rob Reynolds Multi-Wall Packaging Corp. 4010 Suburban Dr. Danville, VA 24540

Manufacturer

Ken Doverspike Beverage Air




Article Test Date Lab Reference Number SPE-27 Sandwich Prep Elite 3/10/2010 BAC-007

LV-72 Three Door Refrigerated Cooler 3/10/2010 BAC-006 SPE-27 - 12 Mega Sandwich Prep Elite 3/10/2010 BAC-008



CCSB Registered Testing LabJasper PetersMulti-Wall Packaging Corporation4010 Suburban Dr.Danville, VA 24540

ManufacturerKen Doverspike

Beverage Air119 Progress Street

Brookville, PA 15825Shipper Registration Number: 180-001

11/22/2010

This letter hereby certifies that the following articles have successfully passed the National MotorFreight Classification Item 180 test procedure, as completed by Multi-Wall Packaging Corporation.This test procedure is not a guarantee against damage during handling and stowing.

Article Test Date Lab Reference NumberSTF58 Milk Cooler 11/12/2010 BAC-010-008

All questions regarding this letter should be directed to [email protected].

Sincerely,

Erin N. Topper

Member / Packaging ConsultantCommodity Classification Standards Board

Page 1 of 6 August 14, 2014 Commodity Classification Standards ...

Documents

Transcript of Page 1 of 6 August 14, 2014 Commodity Classification Standards ...