Page 1 of 46...Page 1 of 46 2012 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University....

Initial Submission

Plan Resubmitted

ISBE Monitoring Completed

Champaign CUSD 4

2/24/2012 9:07:35 AM District Technology Plan Page 1 of 46

© 2012 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University

District Information

1. Contact Information

2. Mid-course Correction - During the course of annual review for e-Rate this plan was found to be in need of mid-course correction on:

3. Annual Review – The plan was reviewed and evaluated on:

District Improvement Team

District Name: Champaign CUSD 4 District Address: 703 S New St

City/State/Zip: Champaign, IL 61820 5818 RCDT Number: 090100040260000

Superintendent: Dr. Judy Wiegand Superintendent Email: [email protected]

District Phone: 2173513800 District Fax: 2173513871

District Technology Planning (DTP) Only

DTP Contact Name*: Roger Grinnip DTP Contact Email*: [email protected]

DTP Contact Phone*: 2173513801 DTP Contact Fax:

Name Association Phone Email

Elizabeth duGruy District Staff 2173513800 [email protected]

Judy Wiegand Superintendent 2173513800 [email protected]

Maria Alanis District Staff 2173513800 [email protected]

Orlando Thomas District Staff 2173513800 [email protected]

Roger Grinnip District Staff 2173513801 [email protected]

Trevor Nadrozny District Staff 2173513800 [email protected]

Champaign CUSD 4



Data & Analysis - Report Card Analysis

Summary - What do the District Report Card data tell you about student performance in your district? If appropriate, the district will consider grade-level and

subgroup performance.

Analysis - What areas of strength are indicated? What areas of weakness, if any, are indicated by these data? What factors are likely to have contributed to these

results? Consider both external and internal factors to the school that can be influenced or improved by the district.

Conclusions - What do these factors imply for next steps in continuous improvement planning? Address these improvement priorities in Assess Indicators (Step 2),

Create Plan (Step 3) and Monitor Plan (Step 4).

Current achievement in reading and mathematics for all students is below the 92.5% minimum standard required in 2012. Student sub-group achievement percentiles for Black,

Hispanic, Students with Disabilities, and Economically Disadvantaged students did not meet the necessary standard.

Students’ thinking processes to focus on important ideas and to juxtapose contrasting examples for different solution strategies need to be strengthened. Students need to be

able to share their work and critically respond to each other’s work and thinking. Students need to be able to manipulate, support, explain and test their conjectures. Lack of a

consistent model/practice to encourage collaboration and the lack of available technology to help support formative assessment practices have contributed to these results.

Technology must be more consciously targeted and integrated into the classroom to support best instructional practice and promote collaborative learning.

Champaign CUSD 4



District Data — Local Assessments

Summary - What do the Local Assessment data tell you about student performance in your district?. If appropriate, the district will consider grade-level and subgroup

performance.

Analysis - What areas of strength are indicated? What areas of weakness, if any, are indicated by these data? What factors are likely to have contributed to these

results? Consider both external and internal factors to the school that can be influenced or improved by the district.

Conclusions - What do these factors imply for next steps in continuous improvement planning? Address these improvement priorities in Assess Indicators (Step 2),

Create Plan (Step 3) and Monitor Plan (Step 4).

District local assessment data in mathematics and reading reflect the District’s State Report Card data, including the student subgroup information previously indicated.

An analysis of the District’s local assessment data reflects similar learning concerns as identified in the District’s State Report Card in the areas of mathematics and reading.

Technology must be more consciously targeted and integrated into the classroom to support best instructional practice and promote collaborative learning.

Champaign CUSD 4




Number Item

9516Number of K-12 self-contained regular classroom students. This includes any student that is counted for purposes of Average Daily Attendance(ADA). It also

refers to students that the district is responsible for in the Student Information System (SIS).

1321 Number of K-12 special education self-contained classroom students

0 Number of Teachers (FTE - this does not include teacher aides)

0 Number of Administrators

17 Number of instructional school buildings with high speed internet access

1 Number of instructional school buildings with low speed internet access

0 Number of instructional school buildings with no internet access

18 SubTotal

6 Number of non-instructional school buildings with high speed internet access

0 Number of non-instructional school buildings with low speed internet access

0 Number of non-instructional school buildings with no internet access

6 SubTotal

18 Total number of instructional school buildings

6 Total number of non-instructional buildings

94 Percentage of instructional school buildings with high speed internet access

5 Percentage of instructional school buildings with low speed internet access

0 Percentage of instructional school buildings with no internet access

100 Percentage of non-instructional school buildings with high speed internet access

0 Percentage of non-instructional school buildings with low speed internet access

0 Percentage of non-instructional school buildings with no internet access

Champaign CUSD 4




Number Item

9516Number of K-12 self-contained regular classroom students. This includes any student that is counted for purposes of Average Daily Attendance(ADA). It also

refers to students that the district is responsible for in the Student Information System (SIS).

1321 Number of K-12 special education self-contained classroom students

0 Number of Teachers (FTE - this does not include teacher aides)

0 Number of Administrators

17 Number of instructional school buildings with high speed internet access

1 Number of instructional school buildings with low speed internet access

0 Number of instructional school buildings with no internet access

18 SubTotal

6 Number of non-instructional school buildings with high speed internet access

0 Number of non-instructional school buildings with low speed internet access

0 Number of non-instructional school buildings with no internet access

6 SubTotal

18 Total number of instructional school buildings

6 Total number of non-instructional buildings

94 Percentage of instructional school buildings with high speed internet access

5 Percentage of instructional school buildings with low speed internet access

0 Percentage of instructional school buildings with no internet access

100 Percentage of non-instructional school buildings with high speed internet access

0 Percentage of non-instructional school buildings with low speed internet access

0 Percentage of non-instructional school buildings with no internet access

Internet Access

Type of Internet Access

Locations

Total Number of

Administrative

Offices

10 mb Ethernet100+ mb

Ethernet

Dedicated

CableDSL Wireless

Other (Dial-up

modem, etc.)

None (no

internet

access)

Instructional Classroom 0 27 608 0 0 26 0 0

Dedicated Computer Lab 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0

Media Center/Library 17 1 17 0 0 0 0 0

Mobile Computer Lab 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0

Administrative Offices 69 2 67 0 0 0 0 0

Teacher Offices 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other Locations 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 86 46 734 0 0 34 0 0

Champaign CUSD 4



Computer Inventory

Desktop Computers

Desktop Computers

High Speed Access ≥56k Low Speed Access

Desktop Computers

Desktop Computers


Laptop/Tablet/Netbook Computers

Laptop/Tablet/Netbook Computers


Handheld Devices

Handheld Devices


Servers

Servers


Operating Systems

PC

Locations Windows 7 Windows VistaWindows XP (any

version)

Windows 2000 (any

version)Windows 95/98 Other PC

Instructional Classroom 2540 0 525 0 0 0

Dedicated Computer Lab 1140 0 60 0 0 0

Media Center/Library 8 0 146 0 0 0

Mobile Computer Lab 0 0 30 0 0 0

Administrative Offices 198 0 47 0 0 0

Teacher Offices 66 0 0 0 0 0

Other Locations/Off-site 47 0 20 0 0 0

Totals 3999 0 828 0 0 0

MACINTOSH

Locations MAC System 10.x MAC System 9.x MAC System 8.x MAC System 7.x Other MAC

Instructional Classroom 0 10 0 0 62

Dedicated Computer Lab 0 0 0 0 0

Media Center/Library 0 0 0 0 15

Mobile Computer Lab 0 25 0 0 0

Administrative Offices 0 0 0 0 19

Teacher Offices 0 0 0 0 0

Other Locations/Off-site 2 0 0 0 0

Totals 2 35 0 0 96

Other Operating Systems (Including Linux)

Location Operating System Number

Instructional Classroom 0

Dedicated Computer Lab 0

Media Center/Library 0

Mobile Computer Lab 0

Administrative Offices 0

Teacher Offices 0

Other Locations 0

Subtotal 0

Operating Systems - Totals

Administrative Other Total

Windows:

Windows 7 264 47 3999

Windows Vista 0 0 0

Windows XP (any version) 47 20 828

Windows 2000 (any version) 0 0 0

Windows 95/98 0 0 0

Other PC 0 0 0

Subtotal 311 67 4827

Macintosh:

MAC System 10.x 0 2 2




Other MAC 19 0 96

Subtotal 19 2 133

Other Operating Systems:

SubTotal 0 0 0

Total 330 69 4960

Champaign CUSD 4



Operating Systems

PC


version)

Windows 2000 (any









Totals 3999 0 828 0 0 0

MACINTOSH









Totals 2 35 0 0 96








Teacher Offices 0

Other Locations 0

Subtotal 0



Windows:

Windows 7 264 47 3999

Windows Vista 0 0 0



Windows 95/98 0 0 0

Other PC 0 0 0


Macintosh:





Other MAC 19 0 96

Subtotal 19 2 133


SubTotal 0 0 0

Total 330 69 4960

Champaign CUSD 4



Operating Systems

PC


version)

Windows 2000 (any









Totals 3999 0 828 0 0 0

MACINTOSH









Totals 2 35 0 0 96








Teacher Offices 0

Other Locations 0

Subtotal 0



Windows:

Windows 7 264 47 3999

Windows Vista 0 0 0



Windows 95/98 0 0 0

Other PC 0 0 0


Macintosh:





Other MAC 19 0 96

Subtotal 19 2 133


SubTotal 0 0 0

Total 330 69 4960

Network Equipment

Type of Equipment

Locations Hubs Routers SwitchesWireless Access

PointsFirewall Spam Filter Content Filter

Intrusion

Detector








Totals 25 0 687 79 6 1 2 1

Champaign CUSD 4



Network Equipment

Type of Equipment

Locations Hubs Routers SwitchesWireless Access

PointsFirewall Spam Filter Content Filter

Intrusion

Detector








Totals 25 0 687 79 6 1 2 1

Licensed Software

Yes No Software Type

nmlkji nmlkj Networking

nmlkji nmlkj Personal Productivity Tools (Word Processing, Spreadsheet, Database, Communications)

nmlkji nmlkj Multimedia (Graphics, Desktop Publishing, Illustration, CAD, Animation, Video editing etc.)

nmlkji nmlkj Desktop Publishing

nmlkji nmlkj Business Software (Accounting, Mapping, Project Management, Desktop Organizers, etc.)

nmlkji nmlkj Programming packages (Computer Programming)

nmlkji nmlkj Student Information Management Systems

nmlkji nmlkj Filtering/Blocking Software

nmlkji nmlkj Anti-Virus

nmlkji nmlkj Other

Telecommunications

Instructional Administrative Total

Landline Service (How many phone numbers - this should reflect

phone service put into the E-Rate 471 application) 150 200 350

Mobile Phone Service (How many phone numbers - this should reflect

mobile phone service put into the E-Rate 471 application and

Blackberries)

0 110 110

Internet connected VOIP(Voice over IP) 125 18 143

Champaign CUSD 4



Telecommunications

Instructional Administrative Total

Landline Service (How many phone numbers - this should reflect

phone service put into the E-Rate 471 application) 150 200 350

Mobile Phone Service (How many phone numbers - this should reflect

mobile phone service put into the E-Rate 471 application and

Blackberries)

0 110 110

Internet connected VOIP(Voice over IP) 125 18 143

Distance Learning

Distance Learning Number of Access Points

Satellite 0

Cable/Broadcast 0

Internet Services for Distance Learning 2

Phone line/v-tel systems 0

Other 0

Analysis

Summary - Briefly describe the technology deployment data in all district and school facilities (refer to the District Summary Technology Report). Technology

deployment includes technology infrastructure, instructional technology integration, information technology, and telecommunications. What do these data tell you?

All data used to develop the action plan must be made available to ISBE, the United States Department of Education, the Universal Services Administrative Company, and

the local community upon request.

Analysis - In what ways, if any, has technology deployment including technology infrastructure, instructional technology integration, and information technology

contributed to student performance?

Conclusions - What do these factors imply for next steps in continuous improvement planning? Address these improvement priorities in Assess Indicators (Step 2) and

Create Plan (Step 3).

The District has increased the device counts on the cutting edge technologies while trying to maintain other resources. There is a need to upgrade infrastructure and install

wireless access capabilities. The District has begun this daunting and costly task as finances has allowed. Computer counts in the mobile device area is increasing due to the focus

on student performance. We now have two schools with 1 to 1 for 3rd through 5th grades. Wirekless is becoming more predominant with complete coverage in one school. The

District is staying with the most current operating systems for the PC machines and still phasing out the Apple platform for computers. The District is utilizing additional mobile

technologies such as the new tablet devices and handheld devices.

There have been gains in the lower grade levels where interactive whiteboards and handheld/mobile devices are available. The most significant increases have been in the area of

Special Education particularly in children with the most challenging issues. Although the data is mostly anecdotal, with the increasing deployment of these technologies the

District is hoping to gather significant hard data this year. The District is also looking fiorward to the results of our first 1 to 1 deployment results this year. Then analysis will be

done on the effectiveness and fidelity of the implementation.

CUrriculum must drive technology integration, deploying technology just to have technology will not drive achievement. The success of the technology intefgration plan will

become mainstream with the curriculum department being the driving force in implementation.

In anticipation of the data continuing to become available from our initiatives this year the District has put together a team of educators to evaluate the best methodology to

incorporate technology in the curriculum to accellerate achievement gains. The continued deployment of interactive whiteboards will be put in full swing with a completion goal

of 2014 SY. To continue the deployment of 1 to 1 computing the need for a complete wireless infrastructure is apparent. This is planned for a District wide deployment with a

completion date of 2014 SY. Continual professional development for educational staff in the use of technology is critical.

Champaign CUSD 4



Analysis

Summary - Briefly describe the technology deployment data in all district and school facilities (refer to the District Summary Technology Report). Technology

deployment includes technology infrastructure, instructional technology integration, information technology, and telecommunications. What do these data tell you?

All data used to develop the action plan must be made available to ISBE, the United States Department of Education, the Universal Services Administrative Company, and

the local community upon request.

Analysis - In what ways, if any, has technology deployment including technology infrastructure, instructional technology integration, and information technology

contributed to student performance?

Conclusions - What do these factors imply for next steps in continuous improvement planning? Address these improvement priorities in Assess Indicators (Step 2) and

Create Plan (Step 3).

The District has increased the device counts on the cutting edge technologies while trying to maintain other resources. There is a need to upgrade infrastructure and install

wireless access capabilities. The District has begun this daunting and costly task as finances has allowed. Computer counts in the mobile device area is increasing due to the focus

on student performance. We now have two schools with 1 to 1 for 3rd through 5th grades. Wirekless is becoming more predominant with complete coverage in one school. The

District is staying with the most current operating systems for the PC machines and still phasing out the Apple platform for computers. The District is utilizing additional mobile

technologies such as the new tablet devices and handheld devices.

There have been gains in the lower grade levels where interactive whiteboards and handheld/mobile devices are available. The most significant increases have been in the area of

Special Education particularly in children with the most challenging issues. Although the data is mostly anecdotal, with the increasing deployment of these technologies the

District is hoping to gather significant hard data this year. The District is also looking fiorward to the results of our first 1 to 1 deployment results this year. Then analysis will be

done on the effectiveness and fidelity of the implementation.

CUrriculum must drive technology integration, deploying technology just to have technology will not drive achievement. The success of the technology intefgration plan will

become mainstream with the curriculum department being the driving force in implementation.

In anticipation of the data continuing to become available from our initiatives this year the District has put together a team of educators to evaluate the best methodology to

incorporate technology in the curriculum to accellerate achievement gains. The continued deployment of interactive whiteboards will be put in full swing with a completion goal

of 2014 SY. To continue the deployment of 1 to 1 computing the need for a complete wireless infrastructure is apparent. This is planned for a District wide deployment with a

completion date of 2014 SY. Continual professional development for educational staff in the use of technology is critical.

Champaign CUSD 4



Action Plan - Goals, Strategies, and Activities

Summary

FY 2013

FY 2014

FY 2015

Goal Number Title

1 Increase student achievement to meet AYP.

Goal Number Title

1 The District will increase its achievement levels in mathematics and reading for ALL students to 100% AYP.

Goal Number Title

1 The District will increase its achievement levels in mathematics and reading for ALL students to 100% AYP.

Champaign CUSD 4




FY 2013

Action Plan- Instruction

FY 2013

Action Plan- Professional Development

FY 2013

Action Plan- Technology Deployment Data

FY 2013

FY 2013 Goal 1 Title:

Increase student achievement to meet AYP.

FY 2013 Goal 1 Description:

While our current student achievement in reading for the ALL catgorey is 72.8% meeting/exceeding, this group will make at least 92.5% AYP in 2013. Further, while our current

student achievement in mathematics for the ALL category is 80.9% meeting/exceeding, this group will make at least 92.5% AYP in 2013.

The District has student sub-groups for Blacks, Hispanics, Two or More Races, LEP, Students with Disabilities and the Economically Disadvantaged. For all the above-cited sub-

groups, the District did not meet the minimum 92.5% AYP standard in both mathematics and reading. Subsequently, the District is targeting its ALL student population for both of

these content areas.



Strategy 1

Strengthening the display and presentation of student work enabling dynamic representations of students thinking processes

Activity 1 Start Date End Date Timeline

The use of the LCD projector/whiteboard will provide opportunities for students to focus on important ideas and makes it

easier to juxtapose contrasting examples and misconception for different solution strategies. 07/01/2012 06/30/2014 During School

Budget & Funding Sources ($)

District Title I Title II-D Title III E-Rate R or D State Funds Grant Funds Other Funds Total

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Increase the use of document cameras in the classroom to 25% of the district’s classrooms. This will provide opportunities

for students to share their work and the class to critically respond to each other’s work and thinking. 07/01/2012 06/30/2014



0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Increase the use of tablets in the district’s classroom to 10%. This will provide opportunities for students to share their

work and reinforce their learnings. 07/01/2012 06/30/2013



120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000

Strategy 2

Supporting formative assessment practices


practices. So that data informs instructional decision making, increases student engagement, provides immediate feedback,

and promotes classroom interactivity. 07/01/2012 06/30/2013 During School



68,000 14,000 0 0 0 0 0 82,000




0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Strategy 3


Begin the 1 to 1 initiative for computer devices.

07/01/2012 06/30/2013 During School



3,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,400,000



Strategy 1

Strengthening the display and presentation of student work enabling dynamic representations of students thinking processes (PURIA model – Play, Use, Recommend,

Incorporate, Assess)


Provide tiered professional development on use of electronic whiteboards and document cameras

08/15/2012 12/19/2012 During School



0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Provide professional development for grade appropriate software that will help students form meaningful connections

between graphical and linguistic representations and to build conceptual connections. (ie. Conceptuamath, Explore

Learning Gizmos, Fathom, Tinkerplots, Geometer’s Sketchpad, Geogebra, NCTM Illuminations, or Smart board MathTools)

07/01/2012 06/30/2013 After School



25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000


Provide tiered professional development for use of tablets.

07/01/2012 06/30/2013



0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 10,000

Strategy 2



Provide Professional Development on use of clicker systems and how to use the data for classroom decision making

09/10/2012 06/06/2013 During School



26,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,000


Build on district initiatives of Standards Based Grading, Gradual Release of Responsibility. Continue to support teacher’s use

of existing district assessment systems – Mastery Manager, AIMSWEB, MAPS, as well as the Elementary Math adoption

component – Online Assessment Management systems and how this data will inform instruction.

07/01/2012 06/30/2013 After School



30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000


Provide support to teachers as they begin to understand the PARCC assessment system and what tests will look like and

how that will drive instructional practices 09/01/2012 05/30/2012 During School



0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Strategy 3

Enhancing collaborative learning


An existing timeline is in place as part of the high school restructuring plan for professional development on Gradual

Release. 01/08/2013 06/06/2013 After School



13,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 25,000



Strategy 1



Interactive whiteboards in each classroom. This is critical especially at the High School level. 50-75% of classrooms will be

equipped with LCD projector, electronic whiteboards and document cameras 07/01/2012 06/30/2013



740,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 740,000


25-50% of classrooms will be equipped with document cameras.

07/01/2012 06/30/2013



100,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 100,000


Improve wired infrastructure to allow the increased bandwidth requirements of the wireless devices and

numbers.Infrastructure built to support e-books, tablets and online technology.



2,400,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 2,400,000

Strategy 2



Purchase in order to increase the number of classrooms that use response systems by 25%.

07/01/2012 06/30/2013 During School



25,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 25,000


Continue to use existing district assessment systems – Mastery Manager, AIMSWEB, MAPS, and Curriculum Assessment

Management systems and technology hardware and software to support these programs 08/16/2012 05/30/2012 During School



0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0


Infrastructure for Common Core PARCC assessment system- preparation for online assessments.

07/01/2012 06/30/2013 During School



0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0

Strategy 3




0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0

Champaign CUSD 4




FY 2013


FY 2013


FY 2013


FY 2013











Strategy 1







0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0






120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000

Strategy 2







68,000 14,000 0 0 0 0 0 82,000




0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Strategy 3



07/01/2012 06/30/2013 During School



3,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,400,000



Strategy 1





08/15/2012 12/19/2012 During School



0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0





07/01/2012 06/30/2013 After School



25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000



07/01/2012 06/30/2013



0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 10,000

Strategy 2




09/10/2012 06/06/2013 During School



26,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,000





07/01/2012 06/30/2013 After School



30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Strategy 3







13,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 0 25,000



Strategy 1







740,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 740,000



07/01/2012 06/30/2013



100,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 100,000






2,400,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 2,400,000

Strategy 2




07/01/2012 06/30/2013 During School



25,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 25,000






0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0



07/01/2012 06/30/2013 During School



0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0

Strategy 3




0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0

Champaign CUSD 4




FY 2013


FY 2013


FY 2013


FY 2013











Strat

Page 1 of 46...Page 1 of 46 2012 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University....

Documents

Transcript of Page 1 of 46...Page 1 of 46 2012 Illinois Interactive Report Card, Northern Illinois University....