Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring...

10
Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht BECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting

Transcript of Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring...

Page 1: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 1

Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions

Richard von Brecht

BECHTEL

2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting

Page 2: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 2

Interface Level Measurement Methods

• Displacer (Negative Buoyancy)• Magnostrictive (Positive Buoyancy)• Traversing Nuclear Detector• Sounding Probe• Differential Pressure• RF Admittance/Capacitance• Microwave Absorption • Guide Wave Radar

Page 3: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 3

Typical Measurement Problems

• 50% Water-Oil Point Read• Vapor-HC reading can’t overlap the HC-

Water reading• Density variances magnified• Measured mid point drifts away from

the true mid point

Page 4: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 4

Installation Methods

• Two Tap External Installation• Multi-Tap External Installation• Direct probe installation

Page 5: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 5

Displacer

• Traditional method for interface measurement

• Four sizes from 14” to 60” for economic and mechanical reasons

• Mechanical, less reliable than other devices• Calibration procedure complex • Density variance effects are almost doubled • Problems with coatings

Page 6: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 6

Differential Pressure

• Well understood, most widely use for standard level measurement

• Continuing to evolve in accuracy, reliability and communication capabilities

• Avoids drifting and coating issues• Maintain a constant leg composition• Sensitive to density variance

Page 7: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 7

RF Admittance/Capacitance

• Mature technology• Calibrated for the conductive water phase• In-situ calibration for low dielectric fluids• Can measure interface over the entire

vessel• Temperature issues• Can compensate to some extent for

coatings

Page 8: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 8

Microwave Absorption

• Measures water• Not influenced by coatings• Un-affected by vessel geometry • Probe maintainable online• Bench calibrated• Maximum range four feet• Requires external power

Page 9: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 9

Guided Wave Radar

• Bench calibrated, un-affected by vessel• Coating influence less• Maximum range 150 feet• Works with boiling fluids• Measures the upper layer• Mixed results with emulsions • Probe not maintainable online

Page 10: Page 1 Interface Level Measurement with Emulsions Richard von Brecht B ECHTEL 2008 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting.

Page 10

Summary

• Displacer• Differential Pressure• RF Admittance/Capacitance• Microwave Absorption • Guide Wave Radar