Padhe Dantewada Likhe Dantewada Annual Report 2016-17dantewada.gov.in/sites/default/files/Padhe...

0

“Padhe Dantewada Likhe Dantewada”

Annual Report

2016-17

1

Table of Content

S. No. Topic Page No.

1. List of Abbreviations 2

2. Background 3

3. Program Implementation 4

4. Coverage 6

5. Assessment 6

6. Findings & Suggestions 29

7. Challenges 30

8. Conclusions 30

9. Further Plans 30

2

General Information

Report name Padhe Dantewada Likhe Dantewada Annual

Report

Report duration April 2016-March 2017

Program Manager Vineeta Dwivedi

Contact details 8982113461, [email protected], House

no. 2, G.T. Capital Homes, near Science

Centre, behind Ambuja Mall, Raipur,

Chhattisgrh 492014.

I. List of Abbreviations

UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund

CAC Cluster Academic Coordinator

BEO Block Education Officer

ABEO Assistant Block Education Officer

BRCC Block Resource Centre Coordinator

BRP Block Resource Person

MT Master Trainer

CRL Cluster Resource Leader

CAMaL Combined Activities for Maximized Learning

ICDS Integrated Child Development Services

mailto:[email protected]

3

II. Background

Pratham was established in 1995 in Mumbai. Since then, the organisation has grown both in

scope and geographical coverage. Since its formation, the organisation has grown into a pan-

India movement with programs reaching millions of children in rural and urban areas across the

country. Our programs are designed to address a gamut of educational problems- pre-school

education, learning support to both in-school and out of school children, mainstreaming of out-

of-school children and vocational training for youth.

Pratham in Chhattisgarh

Our work in Chhattisgarh started in 2007-08 in collaboration with the Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha

Mission and UNICEF to work in Salwa Judum camps in Naxal-affected territories. The focus of

the program was to improve basic language and mathematics skills of displaced children in these

camps. Additionally, the mandate required us to work with and encourage school teachers to

apply Pratham’s interactive techniques of accelerated learning. About 25 Pratham personnel

stayed in the camps for more than four months. Pre tests and post tests of the children were

conducted and showed substantial improvement in the learning levels.

Currently, Pratham is working in 16 blocks across 11 districts in Chhattisgarh.

About Dantewada

Dantewada district is known as South Bastar where most of the population belongs to the tribal

community. The main occupations of these people are farming, daily wage labor works,

collecting forest products and earn their livelihood. Geographically, this area is filled with

natural resources but from several years this place has been affected by Maoists and for this

reason the financial and social condition of the population has been adversely affected.

4

Due to the lack of basic facilities, this area is

extremely backward. Most of the part of this area

is covered with forests and mountains where there

is scarcity of proper roads, modes of transportation

& low educational level due to lack of awareness.

The main occupation of people here is to collect

forest yields and most of the people are involved in

it in which they collect ‘Tendu Patta’, ‘Mahua’,

‘Tora’, Wood, Tamarind, Charoli and hunt

animals. In this occupation, most of the children

are also involved with their parents and thus they could not focus on their school and studies.

This is the main reason behind the lower learning levels of the place.

Objectives: -

Children of Standard 3-8 to achieve proper reading ability and arithmetic skills to do at least

addition, subtraction, multiplication & division of 3 digits.

In all the 826 schools across 4 blocks of Dantewada is the part of this program

III. Program Implementation

Training

From 31st May to 5th June 2016, 54 CACs & 54 teachers were trained for 6 days in the district by

Pratham Personnel. After the training, all the trained MTs have conducted 15 days practice

classes. After this, these MTs trained 1652 teachers across all the 4 blocks in CAMaL pedagogy.

Class Management

After training pre tests were conducted to know the present levels of children of reading and

solving mathematics problem. As per the test results, students were divided in groups as per their

learning levels and not their standards. In each schools 3 hours time was allotted for this

5

program. In this time the children who faced difficulty in reading and solving mathematics were

taught with the help of CAMaL and the children with good learning levels were taught as per

their syllabus. Groupwise TLM was also provided in soft copies by Pratham which was printed

by the district government.

Methodology

Combined Activities for Maximized Learning

(CAMaL), is a pedagogy innovated by Pratham

that evolved as a result of hands-on experience in

different locations and at various stages of work. It

begins with identifying the learning levels of

children instead of assuming their levels based on

their age or grades. The techniques are geared to

help learners achieve all 5 competencies –

Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing and Doing. This pedagogy is used to train the teachers

and they then teach the children by dividing them according to their learning levels and not the

standards.

Monitoring

Regular monitoring has been done by the BRCC, BEO, ABEO, BRP and Pratham team in the

district level from time to time. While monitoring Pratham CRL also provide required support to

the teachers and whenever teacher find any difficulty, the CRL also help him by conducting a

demo class.

Library

With providing support and monitoring in the

schools in morning time our CRLs also conduct

library classes in the evening time in 50 villages

across the district. Each CRL is responsible for

6

conducting such classes in 10 villages. Library classes are conducted in the evening time in the

community where children are made to sit in around 5-6 groups of 5-6 children in each group in

the community in which the students of class 3rd to 8th standard are included irrespective of

whether they are from government or private school. Each group has 1 leader made among the

children and 1 guardian or volunteer is appointed for each group. The objective of this program

is to promote group learning and self learning among children and to encourage community

engagement.

IV. Coverage

This program is been conducted in 826 schools of Kuakonda, Katekalyan, Dantewada & Geedam

blocks of Dantewada among which students of standard 3 to 8 of 526 primary schools and 230

upper-primary schools are involved.

V. Assessment

To keep an eye on the progress of the program, all the students were tested 2 times in the year.

Pre-tests were conducted in the month of August and post-tests were conducted in the month of

March. These testing were done by the teachers using various testing tools and were based on

Hindi and Mathematics subject. By comparing the data of post-test from that of pre-test, one

could measure the improvement in the children with the help of the program.

7

5 different levels were set to test the children’s level. One child is marked in one particular level.

Beginner Letter

Word

Paragraph (Std. 1 level) Story (Std. 2

level)

If the child

is unable to

read even a

single letter,

he is placed

in this level.

A child will be

given 10 letters to

read out of which

he/she needs to

read any 5. If

he/she is able to

read any 4, he/she

would be placed

in letter level but

if not he/she will

be placed in

beginner level.

A child will be

given 10 words

to read out of

which he/she

needs to read any

5. If he/she is

able to read any 4

of them he/she

would be placed

in word level but

if not he/she

would be allowed

to read letters.

Testing begins with

this.

If the child is able to

read the paragraph,

he/she is allowed to

read a story and if

he/she is able to read it,

is placed in story level

but if not he/she is

placed in paragraph

level. But if the child

was not able to read the

paragraph in the

beginning, he/she will

be allowed to read the

words.

If the child is

able to read a

story, he/she is

placed in this

level otherwise

he/she will be

placed in

paragraph

level.

8

5 different levels were set to test the children’s level. One child is marked in one particular level.

Beginner 1 digit number

2 digit number

Subtraction Division

If the child

is unable to

read even a

single digit

number, he

is placed in

this level.

A child will be

given 10 single

digit numbers

to read out of

which he/she

needs to read

any 5. If he/she

is able to read

any 4, he/she

would be

placed in this

level but if not

he/she will be

placed in

beginner level.

A child will be

given 10 2 digit

numbers to read

out of which

he/she needs to

read any 5. If

he/she is able to

read any 4 of

them he/she

would be placed

in 2 digit number

level but if not

he/she would be

allowed to read

single digit

numbers.

Testing begins with

this. The child will be

given 2 questions of

subtraction and if the

child is able to solve

both the questions

he/she would be

allowed to solve the

questions of division

and if he/she is able to

solve it, he/she will be

placed in division

level. If he/she is

unable to solve the

question of division

then will be placed in

subtraction level. But

if the child was not

able to solve the

question of subtraction

in the beginning,

he/she will be allowed

to read the 2 digit

numbers.

The child will be

given 2 questions

of division and if

the child will be

able to solve any

1 out of them

then he/she will

be placed in this

level otherwise

he/she will be

placed in

subtraction level.

9

Dantewada Block result

Table No. 1

Chart No. 1

Dantewada block Std. 3 to 5 reading level

Language

Std. None Letter Word Para Story Total

Std. 3 Base line 5.6 5.4 32.4 27.2 29.5 100

Std. 3 End line 0.0 4.1 24.9 32.7 38.2 100

Std. 4 Base line 4.4 4.9 26.6 21.7 42.4 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 1.8 15.9 29.9 52.5 100

Std. 5 Base line 1.1 1.7 3.9 40.2 53.1 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 0.9 10.4 23.6 65.1 100

Table no. 1 is providing

information about the reading

levels of children of std. 3 to 5 in

base-line & end-line in Dantewada.

In baseline, 4789 children of std. 3

to 5 of Dantewada were tested and

in end line, 3214 children of same

standards were tested.

56.6% children of std. 3 could read

texts of std. 1 level & above in the

baseline which was increased to

70% point in the end line.


std. 2 level texts in the baseline

which was increased by 12% point

and reached to 65.1% point in end

line.

The chart no. 1 is showing the

results of reading levels of children

of std. 3 to 5 in end line tests.


at least std. 1 and above level texts.

10

Table no. 2

Chart No. 2

Dantewada Block Std. 3 to 5 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic

Std. None 1 to 9 10 to 99 Subtraction Division Total

Std. 3 Base line 0.9 38.9 44.2 15.4 0.6 100

Std. 3 End line 0.0 2.5 23.2 42.4 31.8 100

Std. 4 Base line 1.3 30.1 45.6 21.7 1.4 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 1.1 14.0 35.6 49.3 100

Std. 5 Base line 1.5 15.0 27.6 51.6 4.3 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 1.3 8.7 29.3 60.6 100


information about the arithmetic


base-line & end-line in

Dantewada. In baseline, 4789

children of std. 3 to 5 of

Dantewada were tested and in end

line, 3214 children of same


Only 16% children of std. 3 could

solve questions of subtraction or

above of std. 2 level in baseline. It

was increased by 58.2% point and

reached to 74.2% point in the end

line.

Only 4.3% children of std. 5 could

solve the questions of division of

std. 3 level in baseline which was

increased by 56.3% point and

reached to 60.6% point in end

line.


results of arithmetic levels of

children of std. 3 to 5 in end line

tests.

90% children of std. 5 could solve

the questions of subtraction and

above.

11

Table No. 3

Chart No. 3

Dantewada Block Std. 6 to 8 Reading Level

Language


Std. 6 Base line 0.0 0.5 5.7 41.2 52.7 100

Std. 6 End line 0.0 0.5 5.7 19.0 74.9 100

Std. 7 Base line 0.0 0.6 6.8 33.9 58.7 100

Std. 7 End line 0.0 0.5 2.3 17.5 79.6 100

Std. 8 Base line 0.0 0.2 7.9 38.0 53.9 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 1.2 2.7 13.9 82.2 100

Table no. 3 is providing information

about the reading levels of children

of std. 6 to 8 in base-line & end-line

in Dantewada. In baseline, 3379

children of std. 6 to 8 of Dantewada

were tested and in end line, 2413

children of same standards were

tested.


texts of std. 2 level in the baseline

which was increased by 22.3% point

and reached to 74.9% point in the

end line.





line.

The chart no. 3 is showing the results

of reading levels of children of std. 6

to 8 in end line tests. 96.1% children

of std. 8 could read at least std. 1 and

above level texts.

12

Table No. 4

Chart No. 4

Dantewada Block Std. 6 to 8 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 6 Base line 0.0 2.2 50.0 41.2 6.7 100

Std. 6 End line 0.0 0.1 5.5 27.8 66.5 100

Std. 7 Base line 0.0 14.9 42.8 33.9 8.4 100

Std. 7 End line 0.0 0.5 3.1 26.7 69.7 100

Std. 8 Base line 0.0 4.0 38.3 47.2 10.5 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 0.8 3.2 18.4 77.6 100





Dantewada. In baseline, 3379


Dantewada were tested and in

end line, 2413 children of same


Only 6.7% children of std. 6

could solve questions of division

of std. 3 level in baseline. It was


reached to 66.5% point in the

end line.


could solve the questions of

division of std. 3 level in

baseline which was increased by

67.1% point and reached to

77.6% point in end line.




tests.

96.4% children of std. 7 could

solve the questions of

subtraction and above.

13

Geedam Block result

Table No. 5

Chart No. 5

Geedam Block Std. 3 to 5 Reading Level

Language


Std. 3 Base line 34.2 27.2 18.2 13.0 7.4 100

Std. 3 End line 0.1 3.8 27.2 32.7 36.1 100

Std. 4 Base line 34.1 25.4 17.8 13.3 9.4 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 1.9 12.8 27.3 58.0 100

Std. 5 Base line 31.6 25.5 19.8 14.3 8.8 100

Std. 5 End line 0.1 0.3 10.1 26.9 62.6 100


information about the reading


base-line & end-line in Geedam. In

baseline, 4133 children of std. 3 to

5 of Geedam were tested and in




could read texts of std. 1 level &

above in the baseline which was

increased to 68.8% point in the end

line.


read std. 2 level texts in the


53.8% point and reached to 62.6%

point in end line.




31.2% of children of std. 3 are

unable to read the texts of std. 1

level.


read at least std. 1 and above level

texts.

14

Table No. 6

Chart No. 6

Geedam Block Std. 3 to 5 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 3 Base line 33.8 28.8 17.8 11.6 7.9 100

Std. 3 End line 0.3 3.8 25.1 41.6 29.2 100

Std. 4 Base line 34.2 27.2 17.1 13.1 8.5 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 1.8 15.7 36.9 45.7 100

Std. 5 Base line 32.4 27.2 19.0 13.5 7.9 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 1.5 8.1 33.1 57.3 100




base-line & end-line in Geedam.


to 5 of Geedam were tested and in




could solve questions of

subtraction or above of std. 2 level

in baseline. It was increased by

51.3% point and reached to 70.8%

point in the end line.





reached to 57.3% point in end line.




tests.


solve the questions of subtraction

and above.



and above.

15

Table No. 7

Chart No. 7

Geedam Block Std. 6 to 8 reading level

Language


Std. 6 Base line 27.2 28.9 19.3 14.9 9.7 100

Std. 6 End line 0.1 1.3 7.9 25.2 65.6 100

Std. 7 Base line 23.9 25.6 22.3 17.8 10.4 100

Std. 7 End line 0.1 0.7 6.9 18.9 73.4 100

Std. 8 Base line 24.4 25.8 21.8 17.2 10.8 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 0.7 4.7 14.2 80.3 100




in Geedam. In baseline, 3794

children of std. 6 to 8 of Geedam



tested.



which was increased by 55.9%

point and reached to 65.6% point in

the end line.




point and reached to 80.3% point in

end line.






16

Table No. 8

Chart No. 8

Geedam Block Std. 6 to 8 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 6 Base line 26.4 30.0 18.9 14.5 10.2 100

Std. 6 End line 0.1 0.9 10.8 30.7 57.5 100

Std. 7 Base line 24.5 28.9 20.7 16.3 9.6 100

Std. 7 End line 0.1 0.6 8.3 25.3 65.7 100

Std. 8 Base line 25.3 26.9 20.4 16.6 10.8 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 0.5 4.6 24.7 70.2 100




base-line & end-line in Geedam.

In baseline, 3794 children of std.

6 to 8 of Geedam were tested and

in end line, 3688 children of

same standards were tested.






line.



division of std. 3 level in baseline


point and reached to 70.2% point

in end line.




tests.



and above.

17

Katekalyan Block result

Table No. 9

Chart No. 9

Katekalyan block Std. 3 to 5 Reading level

Language


Std. 3 Base line 29.7 33.9 27.1 6.7 2.6 100

Std. 3 End line 0.0 7.5 44.0 28.5 20.0 100

Std. 4 Base line 17.1 32.5 30.4 12.8 7.2 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 5.7 37.8 27.0 29.6 100

Std. 5 Base line 12.4 27.4 30.7 18.6 10.9 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 3.7 27.0 25.5 43.9 100




in Katekalyan. In baseline, 2289

children of std. 3 to 5 of Katekalyan



tested.


read texts of std. 1 level & above in

the baseline which was increased to

48.5% point in the end line.



which was increased by 33% point


line.


of reading levels of children of std. 3

to 5 in end line tests.



18

Table No. 10

Chart No. 10

Katekalyan Block Std. 3 to 5 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 3 Base line 25.8 45.7 19.1 8.8 0.5 100

Std. 3 End line 0.0 7.7 43.3 35.0 14.1 100

Std. 4 Base line 19.1 39.7 23.3 15.6 2.4 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 6.6 36.0 31.4 26.1 100

Std. 5 Base line 11.9 29.5 29.1 22.3 7.2 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 4.7 26.7 29.2 39.5 100





Katekalyan. In baseline, 2289


Katekalyan were tested and in end

line, 1547 children of same



solve questions of subtraction or

above of std. 2 level in baseline. It



line.









tests.



and above.

19

Table No. 11

Chart No. 11

Katekalyan block Std. 6 to 8 reading level

Language


Std. 6 Base line 0.0 9.1 21.8 28.1 41.0 100

Std. 6 End line 0.0 0.0 3.8 21.3 74.9 100

Std. 7 Base line 0.0 4.3 13.9 30.6 51.2 100

Std. 7 End line 0.0 0.0 0.8 21.4 77.8 100

Std. 8 Base line 0.0 6.3 10.5 29.9 53.3 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 0.0 2.8 9.2 88.1 100


information about the reading levels

of children of std. 6 to 8 in base-line

& end-line in Katekalyan. In

baseline, 945 children of std. 6 to 8

of Katekalyan were tested and in end

line, 724 children of same standards

were tested.

41% children of std. 6 could read



and reached to 74.9% point in the

end line.





line.




99.2% children of std. 7 could read at

least std. 1 and above level texts.

20

Table No. 12

Chart No. 12

Katekalyan Block Std. 6 to 8 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 6 Base line 0.0 10.4 15.8 38.5 35.3 100

Std. 6 End line 0.0 0.4 4.9 27.8 66.9 100

Std. 7 Base line 0.0 8.3 14.8 27.5 49.4 100

Std. 7 End line 0.0 0.4 4.1 22.6 72.8 100

Std. 8 Base line 0.0 6.6 12.5 29.6 51.3 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 0.0 3.7 13.3 83.0 100





Katekalyan. In baseline, 945


Katekalyan were tested and in







reached to 66.9% point in the

end line.



division of std. 3 level in


31.7% point and reached to 83%

point in end line.




tests.


solve the questions of

subtraction and above.

21

Kuakonda Block result

Table No. 13

Chart No. 13

Kuakonda block Std. 3 to 5 reading level

Language


Std. 3 Base line 29.7 32.0 18.7 9.9 9.7 100

Std. 3 End line 0.0 1.6 17.7 34.5 46.2 100

Std. 4 Base line 18.3 27.0 21.5 18.4 14.7 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 1.5 10.6 29.1 58.8 100

Std. 5 Base line 17.6 21.3 21.7 21.1 18.2 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 0.7 8.2 19.0 72.1 100


about the reading levels of children of

std. 3 to 5 in base-line & end-line in

Kuakonda. In baseline, 2892 children of

std. 3 to 5 of Kuakonda were tested and



Only 19.6% children of std. 3 could read

texts of std. 1 level & above in the

baseline which was increased to 80.7%


Only 18.2% children of std. 5 could read

std. 2 level texts in the baseline which



The chart no. 13 is showing the results of

reading levels of children of std. 3 to 5 in

end line tests.

91.1% children of std. 5 could read at


22

Table No. 14

Chart No. 14

Kuakonda Block Std. 3 to 5 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 3 Base line 21.0 40.4 24.8 12.3 1.5 100

Std. 3 End line 0.0 1.3 17.7 42.7 38.3 100

Std. 4 Base line 17.5 35.1 21.8 19.3 6.2 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 1.1 9.9 39.3 49.7 100

Std. 5 Base line 17.0 24.2 27.5 19.9 11.3 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 0.5 7.9 25.3 66.2 100




base-line & end-line in Kuakonda.


to 5 of Kuakonda were tested and




could solve questions of

subtraction or above of std. 2 level

in baseline. It was increased by

72.2% point and reached to 90%







in end line.




tests.

89% children of std. 4 could solve

the questions of subtraction and

above of std. 2 level. 91.5%

children of std. 5 could solve the

questions of subtraction and above

of std. 2 level.

23

Table No. 15

Chart No. 15

Kuakonda Block Std. 6 to 8 reading level

Language


Std. 6 Base line 15.4 15.2 17.5 24.5 27.4 100

Std. 6 End line 0.0 1.0 6.9 19.0 73.1 100

Std. 7 Base line 10.6 14.7 15.3 22.2 37.2 100

Std. 7 End line 0.0 0.0 5.2 13.7 81.1 100

Std. 8 Base line 7.8 11.2 13.8 22.6 44.7 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 0.6 3.4 14.6 81.4 100


about the reading levels of children of

std. 6 to 8 in base-line & end-line in

Kuakonda. In baseline, 1738 children

of std. 6 to 8 of Kuakonda were tested

and in end line, 1571 children of same





and reached to 73.1% point in the end

line.

44.7% children of std. 8 could read std.

2 level texts in the baseline which was

increased by 36.7% point and reached

to 81.4% point in end line.


of reading levels of children of std. 6 to

8 in end line tests.

96% children of std. 8 could read at


24

Table No. 16

Chart No. 16

Kuakonda Block Std. 6 to 8 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 6 Base line 15.9 20.2 18.4 31.6 13.9 100

Std. 6 End line 0.0 0.8 6.4 26.2 66.6 100

Std. 7 Base line 9.8 17.5 24.1 22.7 25.9 100

Std. 7 End line 0.0 0.0 5.8 18.7 75.5 100

Std. 8 Base line 7.4 14.2 19.6 26.3 32.5 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 1.1 2.1 19.6 77.2 100




base-line & end-line in Kuakonda.


to 8 of Kuakonda were tested and








line.






in end line.




tests.



and above.

25

Dantewada District result

Table No. 17

Dantewada District Std. 3 to 5 reading level

Language


Std. 3 Base line 23.2 22.3 24.5 15.8 14.2 100

Std. 3 End line 0.0 3.9 26.8 32.5 36.7 100

Std. 4 Base line 17.9 19.9 23.6 17.2 21.4 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 2.4 17.0 28.3 52.3 100

Std. 5 Base line 15.2 16.4 16.0 25.5 26.8 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 1.0 11.8 24.1 63.1 100

30% children of std. 3 were able to read the texts of std. 1 level or above in the district. In end

line tests, it was increased to 69.2% who could read the texts of std. 1 level or above.

26.8% children of std. 5 were able to read the texts of std. 2 level. In end line tests, it was

increased to 63.1%

26

Table No. 18

Dantewada District Std. 6 to 8 reading level

Language


Std. 6 Base line 13.3 14.9 14.6 26.8 30.4 100

Std. 6 End line 0.0 0.9 6.7 21.8 70.6 100

Std. 7 Base line 11.0 13.0 14.9 25.4 35.8 100

Std. 7 End line 0.0 0.4 4.7 17.8 77.0 100

Std. 8 Base line 10.9 12.6 14.6 26.6 35.4 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 0.8 3.7 13.8 81.7 100

30.4% children of std. 6 were able to read the texts of std. 2 level in the district. In end line

tests, it was increased to 70.6%.

35.4% children of std. 8 were able to read the texts of std. 2 level. In end line tests, it was

increased to 81.7%.

‘CAMaL’ Program was conducted for 8 months with all the children of std. 3 to 8 in

Dantewada. A great improvement could be seen in the reading levels of children in end line test

results.

27

Table No. 19

Dantewada District Std. 3 to 5 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 3 Base line 19.1 37.5 28.0 12.5 2.9 100

Std. 3 End line 0.1 3.4 25.5 41.2 29.8 100

Std. 4 Base line 17.0 31.9 28.8 17.8 4.6 100

Std. 4 End line 0.0 2.2 17.1 36.2 44.5 100

Std. 5 Base line 15.4 22.5 25.2 29.6 7.2 100

Std. 5 End line 0.0 1.6 10.5 29.8 58.1 100

15.4% children of std. 3 were able to solve the questions of subtraction and above of std. 2 level

in the district. In end line tests, it was increased to 80%.

7.2% children of std. 5 were able to solve the questions of division of std. 3 level. In end line


28

Table No. 20

Dantewada District Std. 6 to 8 Arithmetic level

Arithmetic


Std. 6 Base line 13.1 16.9 28.9 28.9 12.1 100

Std. 6 End line 0.0 0.6 7.9 28.7 62.7 100

Std. 7 Base line 11.1 20.1 28.3 24.6 16.0 100

Std. 7 End line 0.0 0.4 5.9 24.3 69.3 100

Std. 8 Base line 11.2 14.9 25.8 30.1 18.1 100

Std. 8 End line 0.0 0.6 3.7 21.1 74.6 100

12.1% children of std. 6 were able to solve the questions of division of std. 3 level in the district.

In end line tests, it was increased to 62.7%.

18.1% children of std. 8 were able to solve the questions of division of std. 3 level. In end line


29

VI. Findings & Suggestions

Around 45% children were not able to recognise even letters and 56% children were not able

to recognise single digit numbers in the base line tests in the district so it is clear that there is

need to work a lot with the children of std. 1 & 2.

Many children get stuck in the word and paragraph level irrespective of their standards so if

more focus will be given on these levels, good and long-term results could be achieved.

It is really a great matter of concern that many children of std. 6 to 8 are not able to recognise

letters and numbers. There is need to work on the basic competencies in these standards too.

As per this year results, good progress could be seen in children so this year there is need to

focus on further competencies and new testing tools would be needed for the same.

This year, teachers’ could prepare a learning plan for each school after analysing and

understanding the data.

CAC’s played a very important role in the whole program and this year efforts should be

made for their capacity building.

Few people should be given the responsibility of this program in district level who could

constantly instruct others.

The program should also be evaluated by any outside organisation.

There is need to conduct this program for longer period so that teachers could adopt this

methodology and to achieve long term results.

30

VII. Challenges

Several times program faces delay due to administration reasons.

Teachers misunderstood the evaluation method with their performance evaluation as they

fail to understand the method properly and thus in some places, evaluation was not done

properly.

Many programs of various other organisations are going on Dantewada among which

coordination is needed.

VIII. Conclusion

Good results are achieved in such a short period in the district but there is still need to work in a

focused way and to focus on higher competencies. ICDS should also be involved in this

program. Teachers should also be trained in how to understand the data and plan accordingly.

IX. Further Plans

Efforts would be made to involve Anganwadi with the program by talking with ICDS.

Teachers’ training will be conducted for higher competencies and data analysis.

Library program will be extended more to connect and engage the community with

education.

Learning plans will be prepared for all the schools on the basis of last year results.

Padhe Dantewada Likhe Dantewada Annual Report 2016-17dantewada.gov.in/sites/default/files/Padhe...

Documents

Transcript of Padhe Dantewada Likhe Dantewada Annual Report 2016-17dantewada.gov.in/sites/default/files/Padhe...