PA-100 RP-10 RAM R-200 … · Tuesday, December 27, 2016 PA-100 RP-10 RAM R-200 Report on the...

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

PA-100

RP-10

RAM R-200

Report on the inspection for compliance with

United States Military Standards

MIL-STD-810E

MIL-STD-462

MIL-STD-1512

Name Date Signature

Conducted by: Valentin Ladizhensky 30/11/2016

Approved by: Dimitry Ginzburg 04/12/2016

of 74

Contents

1. Scope………….….. ............................................................................................................. 4

2. Standard test conditions ........................................................................................................ 6

3. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 8

4. Detailed requirements and test procedures ........................................................................... 9

5. Environmental factors…………………………………………………………………….10

6. EMC……………………………………………………………………………….……...40

ANNEX A – Qualitech-Environment Test Report ......................................................

ANNEX B – Qualitech-EMC Test Report ...................................................................

of 74

This Page Is Left Blank

of 74

1. Scope

1.1. Purpose.

- The test report describes all the requirements, procedures and results in accordance

with the United States Military Standards. This report includes all the test activities

that were performed to demonstrate compliance with the standard.

- Basis for inspections is a document 720-ERAV2016001/1 that lists the requirements

for inspection and special conditions

- Report Arrangement :

Section 4 of this test report is an executive summary with test results.

The numbering of the tests is according to the MIL-STD- numbers.

1.2. Equipment under test:

- PA-100M – Alpha Detector contains atmospheric cells made of aluminium containing

a thin anode wire. The surface of the cell is a membrane of aluminized Mylar, protected

by a fine stainless steel wire mesh.

- RP-10 – Gamma Detector scintillation probe. Contains a highly efficient, hermetically

sealed, NaI(Tl) scintillator, 2″ diameter and 0.04″ thick, coupled to a 2″ photomultiplier

tube. This is encased in a rugged, window splash proof housing for protection against

shock, vibration and humidity, with 1mm Aluminium.

- RAM R-200 - This Monitor connect with the two above-mentioned detectors (PA-100

and RP-10). RAM-R-200 is portable multifunctional, rugged survey meter designed for

measuring wide range gamma radiation fields and contamination. The RAM R-200

along with its internal detectors is waterproof to a depth of 1 meter.

- RAM R-200 Detector Cable: This is a special cable for connection between the

Monitor and Detectors.

- Case – (BAK-1425) Case for storage and transportation of the above equipment.

Watertight, crushproof, and dustproof with Foam. (By Polycart Technologies Ltd.)

Table 1. Detectors under Test

No Hardware Component Manufacturer PN Serial N Quantity

1 RAM R-200 13220 10106290 1

2 RAM R-200 13220 10106302 1

3 RAM R-200 4-0037 8104-027 1

4 RAM R-200 4-0037 8104-029 1

5 PA-100M BAK-1340 9615-003 1

6 PA-100M BAK-1340 9615-007 1

7 RP-10 BAK-2175 3307-004 1

8 RP-10 BAK-2175 3307-012 1

http://www.pelican.com/us/en/product/watertight-protector-hard-cases/medium-case/standard/1450/#1450

of 74

1.3. References

Testing is carried out according the recommendations and requirements of the following

sources:

- 720-ERAV2016001/1 – Document Basis for inspections

- DoD Test Readiness Review Checklist (TRR)

- TEST AND EVALUATION MANAGEMENT GUIDE, PUBLISHED BY THE

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY PRESS FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-

55654

- IEC 1000-4-2 (ESD Immunity)

- MIL-STD-810 MILITARY STANDARD: ENVIRONMENTAL TEST METHODS AND

ENGINEERING GUIDELINES

- MIL-STD-462 MILITARY STANDARD: MEASUREMENT OF ELECTROMAGNETIC

INTERFERENCE CHARACTERISTICS

- MIL-STD-1512 MILITARY STANDARD: ELECTROEXPLOSIVE SUBSYSTEMS,

ELECTRICALLY INITIATED, DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND TEST METHODS. MILITARY

STANDARD ELECTROEXPLOSIVE SUBSYSTEMS, ELECTRICALLY INITIATED, DESIGN

REQUIREMENTS AND TEST METHODS

of 74

2. Standard test conditions

Table 2. Compliance test standards

## Test Name Standard Notes

1 Temperature Storage MIL-STD-810E, Meth 501.3/502.3, Proc I Environment

2 Operation Temperature MIL-STD-810E, Meth 501.3/502.3, Proc II Environment

3 Low Pressure MIL-STD-810E, Meth 500.3, Proc II. Environment

4 Humidity MIL-STD-810E, Meth 507.3, Proc I, Cycle 3 Environment

5 Sand and Dust MIL-STD-810E, Meth 510.3, Proc I. Environment

6 Vibration MIL-STD-810E, Meth 514.4 Environment

7 Rain MIL-STD-810E, Meth 506.3 Section-II Environment

8 Radiated Emissions MIL-STD-462, RE02 EMC

9 Radiated Susceptibility MIL-STD-462, RS03 EMC

10 ESD MIL-STD-1512, Proc.205 EMC

11 RFI/EMI IEC 61503, Ed.1 EMC

12 Mechanical Shock MIL-STD-810E, Meth 516.4, Proc IV Environment

of 74

2.1. List of tests and responsibilities

Table 3. List of tests and responsibilities

## Test Name Performed by Date

Reference detailed Report No

1 Temperature (Operation/Storage) Qualitech-Environment 18-20/09/2016

20160918-1605

2 Low Pressure Qualitech-Environment 20/09/2016 20160918-1605

3 Humidity Qualitech-Environment 20-22/09/2016 20160918-1605

4 Sand and Dust Carmel Laboratories 3-6/11/2016 20160918-1605

5 Vibration Qualitech-Environment 25/10/2016 20160918-1605

6 Rain Qualitech-Environment 25/10/2016 20160918-1605

7 Radiated Emissions Qualitech-EMC 6/10/2016 RMI 031116

8 Radiated Susceptibility Qualitech-EMC 9/10/2016 RMI 031116

9 ESD Qualitech-EMC 13/10/2016 RMI 031116

10 RFI/EMI Qualitech- EMC 5/10/2016 20160918-1605

11 Mechanical Shock Qualitech-Environment 7/11/2016 20160918-1605

- Test Source: Thorium-232

of 74

3. Executive Summary Tested instruments demonstrated compliance with the referenced standards. Few deficiencies

were identified and recommendations were made for their correction. One failure was

observed during one the Operation Temperature test that requires reviewing the instrument

specifications for this characteristic. All the results are detailed in Table 4.

Table 4. Test summary and detailed results

## Test Name Standard Test Result

1 Temperature Storage MIL-STD-810E, Meth 501.3/502.3, Proc I Passed

2 Operation Temperature MIL-STD-810E, Meth 501.3/502.3, Proc II Passed – for RP-10

Failed – for PA-100

3 Low Pressure MIL-STD-810E, Meth 500.3, Proc II. Passed

4 Humidity MIL-STD-810E, Meth 507.3, Proc I, Cycle 3 Passed

5 Sand and Dust MIL-STD-810E, Meth 510.3, Proc I. Passed

6 Vibration MIL-STD-810E, Meth 514.4 Passed

7 Rain MIL-STD-810E, Meth 506.3 Section-II Passed

8 Radiated Emissions MIL-STD-462, RE02 Passed

9 Radiated Susceptibility MIL-STD-462, RS03 Passed

10 ESD MIL-STD-1512, Proc.205 Passed

11 RFI/EMI IEC 61503, Ed.1 Passed

12 Mechanical Shock MIL-STD-810E, Meth 516.4, Proc IV Passed

of 74

4. Detailed requirements and test procedures

Detailed requirements and test methods are described in the attached documents laboratory

reports:

“QualiTech Compliance Engineering Environmental & Mechanical Lab” Annex A -

Report No: 20160918-1605

“QualiTech EMC Laboratory” Annex B - Report No: RMI 031116

of 74

5. Environmental factors

The Environmental tests were conducted at the accredited laboratory

“QualiTech Compliance Engineering Environmental & Mechanical Lab”.

See Annex A - Report No: 20160918-1605

5.1. Storage Temperature 5.1.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Storage

temperature according to the MIL-STD-810E Meth 501.3/502.3 Procedure I. Use high and

low temperature tests to obtain data to help evaluate effects of high/low temperature

conditions on material safety, integrity, and performance.

An instrument shall not exhibit a response greater than that stated by the manufacturer to

radiation other than the type of radiation for which it is designed.

5.1.2. Experiment

Use Procedure-I to investigate how high/low temperatures during storage affect the

material (integrity of materials, and safety/performance of the material). This test procedure

includes exposing the test item to high/low temperatures (and low humidity where

applicable) that may be encountered in the material's storage situation, followed by an

operational test at controlled or high temperature ambient conditions.

Storage -20°C/+70°C.

Total test duration of 50 hours, 24 hours in each extreme temperature.

of 74

Fig.5.1.2. Temperature profile on Storage mode

All devices in the test are packed in Case (Pic.5.1.2.)

Pic.5.1.2

of 74

Table 5.1.2. UUT configuration

5.1.3. Results:

a) Instrument functionality

Table 5.1.3. Storage test result.

Instruments show solid performance after the test, the measurement is correct and

does not differ from measurement before the storage. The loss of product functionality is not

detected.

of 74

b) Mechanical status

- Observed slight compression and deformation of foam inside the case. (Pic.5.1.3.1)

- In one place foam damage found (Pic.5.1.3.2)

Despite the damage, the functionality of the Case is according to requirements. The loss of

product functionality is not detected.

(Pic.5.1.3.1) (Pic.5.1.3.2)

of 74

5.1.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Storage temperature test

according to the MIL-STD-810E Meth 501.3/502.3 Procedure I standard.

Foam in the case needs improvement.

5.1.5. Solution

Representative of “Polycart Technologies Ltd.” proposed changes of material and

technology, which should solve the problem and eliminate the disadvantages.

The requirement is met

of 74

5.2. Operation Temperature 5.2.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Operation

temperature according to the MIL-STD-810E Meth 501.3/502.3 Procedure II.

Use Procedure II to investigate how high/low ambient temperatures may affect material

performance while it is operating.

Specification of UUT:

a) Detector PA-100:

- Temperature Range Operation: -10°C to +50°C

- Accuracy ± 15%

b) Detector RP-10:

- Temperature Range Operation: -30°C to +60°C

- Instrument accuracy is not determined to be a function of temperature and does

not affect the functionality of the device.

5.2.2. Experiment

Operation -10°C/+55°C, 3 cycle of 4 hours in each extreme temperature. Total test duration

of 40 hours.

Fig.5.2.2. Temperature profile on Operation temperature test

of 74

5.2.3. Results:

5.2.3.1. Checking prior to the test.

All instruments have been tested in the chamber in a stable geometry before starting

Temperature testing at room temperature +24°C

Table. 5.2.3.1

of 74

5.2.3.2. Results of Temperature Operation Test

Table. 5.2.3.2

- RP-10 S/N 3307-012 (Det-8): Demonstrated stable operation over the entire

temperature range. Test Passed.

- RP-10 S/N 3307-004 (Det-7): Demonstrated stable operation over the entire

temperature range. Registered unintentional entering into the calibration mode. The

UUT then continued normal operation. Test Passed.

- PA-100 S/N 9615-003 (Det-5): It does not operate at temperatures -10°С, to absence

of measurement. At other temperatures operation is normal. Test Failed.

- PA-100 S/N 9615-007 (Det-6): does not operate at temperatures -10°С, unacceptable

measurement error. At other temperatures operation is normal. Test Failed.

of 74

5.2.4. Conclusion:

a) The results of this test confirm that the EUT RP-10 withstands the Temperature Operation

requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E.


b) The results of this test confirm that EUT PA-100 withstands, except the operation at low

temperatures preventing Temperature Operation requirement according

to the MIL-STD-810E.

The requirement is met partially

5.2.5. Solution:

Adjust instrument specification of the device PA-100 with revised Operational Temperature

conditions.

of 74

5.3. Low pressure (altitude) test

5.3.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Low pressure

(altitude) test according to the Mil-Std-810E, Method 500.3 Procedure I & II standard.

Use low pressure (altitude) tests to determine if material can withstand and/or operate in a

low pressure environment and/or withstand rapid pressure changes. This method includes

four low pressure tests. In this test, only the first two procedures: Procedure I (Storage);

Procedure II (Operation).

a) Procedure I - Storage/Air Transport. Procedure I is appropriate if the material is to be

transported or stored at high ground elevations or transported by air in its shipping/storage

configuration.

b) Procedure II - Operation/Air Carriage. Use Procedure II to determine the performance of

the material under low pressure conditions.

5.3.2. Experiment

a) Storage at altitude of 15,000 ft. for 1 hour

b) Operation at altitude of 5,000 ft. for 1 hour

Pic.5.3.2.1. Equipment located in Low Pressure (Altitude) chamber.

of 74

5.3.3. Results:

Table. 5.3.3. Results of measuring during Low Pressure Test.

5.3.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Low pressure (altitude) test



of 74

5.4. Humidity Test

5.4.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Humidity

Test according to the MIL-STD-810E, Meth 507.3, Proc I, Cycle 3.

The purpose of this method is to determine the resistance of material to the effects of

a warm, humid atmosphere.

5.4.2. Experiment

Test condition of 30°C/94% RH for duration of 48 hours.

Pic.5.4.2.1. Equipment located in Temperature/Humidity chamber.

- RP-10 Instruments are exposed the test while it is Operating mode.

- Instruments PA-100 during the test storage into Cases.

of 74

5.4.3. Results:

Table. 5.4.3. Randomly monitoring of measurements during Humidity test progress

The loss of product functionality is not detected. Test Passed.

5.4.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Humidity Test



of 74

5.5. Sand and Dust

5.5.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Dust according to the

MIL-STD-810E Meth 510.3 Procedure I.

Dust (< 150μm) procedure. This test is performed to help evaluate the ability of

material to resist the effects of dust that may obstruct openings, penetrate into cracks,

crevices, bearings, and joints, and to evaluate the effectiveness of filters.

Procedure I - Blowing Dust. Use Procedure I to investigate the susceptibility of

material to concentrations of blowing dust.

5.5.2. Experiment

Total test duration of 12 hours, 6 hours in each extreme temperature (+70°C)

Table 5.5.2. UUT configuration

of 74

EUT is packed in Cases and placed in the Chamber:

Before Test:

Pic. 5.5.2.1

After Test:

Pic. 5.5.2.2

of 74

Pic. 5.5.2.3

5.5.3. Results:

5.5.3.1. Leak tightness of Case: The penetration of dust inside of the case is not detected.

Test Passed.

5.5.3.2. Operating after test:

Check measurement function after the test

of 74

Deviations in dimensions of less than 10 percent.


5.5.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Dust requirement according to

the MIL-STD-810E.


of 74

5.6. RANDOM VIBRATION

5.6.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Vibration according

to the MIL-STD-810E Meth 514.4 Procedure I standard.

5.6.2. Experiment

During the test instruments were attached to vibration exciter. Vibration is carried out on

three axes - Vertical, Longitudinal and Transverse, of 15 minutes in each axis.

Table 5.6.2.1 Vibration exposures

of 74

Pic. 5.6.2. UUT mounted on Electrodynamic Shaker

5.6.3. Results:

Table 5.6.3.1 Pre-Test (Before the start of stage of tests Vibration resistance)

of 74

Table 5.6.3.2. Test after vibration on Vertical axe.

Fig. 5.6.3.2. Test after vibration on Vertical axe.

-100.0-90.0-80.0-70.0-60.0-50.0-40.0-30.0-20.0-10.0

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

ERR

OR

[%

]

Time [min]

Vertical

UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4

of 74

Table 5.6.3.3. Test after vibration on Transverse axe.

Fig. 5.6.3.3. Test after vibration on Transverse axe.

-100.0-90.0-80.0-70.0-60.0-50.0-40.0-30.0-20.0-10.0

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

ERR

OR

[%

]

Time [min]

Transverse


of 74

Table 5.6.3.4. Test after vibration on Longitudinal axe.

Fig.5.6.3.4. Test after vibration on Longitudinal axe.

Note: AVERAGE* - after stabilization of Detector PA-100M 5 minutes after stopping

vibration.


5.6.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Vibration requirement according

to the MIL-STD-810E.


-100.0-90.0-80.0-70.0-60.0-50.0-40.0-30.0-20.0-10.0

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0

100.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

ERR

OR

[%

]

Time [min]

Longitudinal


of 74

5.7. Rain

5.7.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Rain according to the

MIL-STD-810E, Meth 506.3 Section-II standard. This method to evaluate material likely to

be exposed to rain, water spray, or dripping water during storage, transit, or operation.

5.7.2. Experiment

- UUT-2 (RAM R-200 + PA-100M) - tested on Storage into Case (BAK-1425)

(See Annex A: Sec.8 - DRIP BOX WATER TEST - 16/7024)

- UUT-1 (RAM R-200 + RP-10) - tested in Operation Mode

(See Annex A: Sec.8 - DRIP BOX WATER TEST - 16/7061)

Pic.5.7.2. Instruments under Drip water test.

of 74

5.7.3. Results:

a) Instrument functionality

Table.5.7.3.1. Measurements before the Rain test.

Table.5.7.3.2. Measurements after the Rain test.


of 74

b) Impermeability

- UUT-2 (RAM R-200 + PA-100M) - tested on Storage into Case (BAK-1425)

Pic.5.7.3.1. The Case (BAK-1425) after the Rain test.

of 74

Pic.5.7.3.2. Instruments RAM R-200 + PA-100M into The Case (BAK-1425) after the Rain

test.

During visual inspection, at completion of the test, no water penetration was observed. Test

Passed.

5.7.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Rain requirement according to

the MIL-STD-810E.


of 74

5.8. Mechanical Shock

5.8.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Mechanical Shock

(Drop) the according to the MIL-STD-816E, Meth 516.4 Paragraph IV standard.

Shock tests are performed to:

a) Provide a degree of confidence that material can physically and functionally withstand the

relatively infrequent, non-repetitive shocks encountered in handling, transportation, and

service environments. This may include an assessment of the overall material system

integrity for safety purposes in any one or all of the handling, transportation, and service

environments;

b) Determine the material's fragility level, in order that packaging may be designed to protect

the material's physical and functional integrity; and

c) Test the strength of devices that attach material to platforms that can crash.

5.8.2. Experiment

5.8.2.1. Free Fall (Drop) Test – All instruments packed into Cases (BAK-1425).

Pic.5.8.2.1.1. Packaging instruments in the cases before the Free Fall (Drop) Test.

of 74

Pic.5.8.2.1.2. UUT stranded on LANSMONT - PDT56ED Drop Tester

Free Fall (Drop) Test.

Test description: Drop Height: 1 m.

Number of Drops of Test Item: One drop was performed on each of the 4 corners of test item.

Total Number of Drops: 4 drops.

5.8.2.2. Bench Handling Drop Test One edge was raised to a height of 10 cm, or to a position that the chassis forms an angle of

45° with the horizontal bench top; 4 drops at each unit.

Pic.5.8.2.2. Bench Handling Drop Test procedure

of 74

5.8.3. Results:

a) Functional test:

Table.5.8.3.1. Measurements before the Drop test.

Table.5.8.3.2. Measurements After Free Fall (Drop) Test (Packed into Case)

of 74

Table.5.8.3.3. Measurements after Bench Handling Drop Test


b) Visual inspection: Damage is not detected. Test Passed.

5.8.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Mechanical Shock requirement

according to the MIL-STD-810E, Meth 516.4 Paragraph IV.


of 74

6. Electromagnetic Compatibility Test (EMC)

The Electromagnetic Compatibility Test tests were conducted at the accredited

laboratory “QualiTech EMC Laboratory” , See Annex B - Report No: RMI 031116.

6.1. Immunity to Electrostatic Discharge

6.1.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Electrostatic

Discharge the according to IEC 61000-4-2 standard.

IEC 61000-4-2 outlines the international immunity standard for electronic equipment

ability to withstand ESD generated from a human body or metal objects with a built up static

charge. The standard assumes that the source is an electrified human body discharge, and

testing simulates the current waveform generated in those conditions.

6.1.2. Experiment

Equipment: Noiseken, ESS-2000 Electrostatic Discharge Simulator.

Contact Discharge kV

Air Discharge kV

Pic. 6.1.2. Immunity to Electrostatic Discharge Test Station

6.1.3. Results:

a) Functional test:

of 74

Table.6.1.3.1. Measurements before ESD-Test

Table.6.1.3.2. Measurements after ESD-Test


of 74

b) Visual Inspection: During the test, break segments appeared on the display and after the

test the unit returned to normal operation. . Test Passed.

6.1.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Electrostatic Discharge

requirement according to the to IEC 61000-4-2 standard.


6.2. Immunity to Radiated Electromagnetic Field

6.2.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Immunity to

Radiated Electromagnetic Field the according to IEC 61000-4-3.

This standard is part of a set of basic EMC standards that outline test procedures

that must be successfully accomplished before products can be sold. The object of

this particular standard is to establish a common reference of a product or device to

radiated RF immunity cause by any emitting source. Products must be designed and

tested to insure that they are immune to both intentional transmitters, such as walkie

talkies and cell phones, and unintentional RF emitting devices like electric motors and

welders.

of 74

6.2.2. Experiment

The EUT was placed in a full-anechoic chamber on a non-conductive table 0.8m above the

absorbing ground plane, and was configured, arranged and operated in a manner consistent with

typical application and load conditions. Normal performance of the EUT was verified.

The EUT was positioned parallel to the pre-calibrated “uniform area” at a distance of 2.7m for

frequency range below 1GHz and for the frequency range above 1GHz at 2.5m from the transmitting

antenna.

The frequency range was swept in steps of 1% with 1kHz sine-wave 80% Amplitude

modulated with a dwell time of 1 sec. A list of clock and sensitive frequencies were analyzed

separately if made available.

Special exercising S/W was used in order to precisely generate the required electromagnetic

field based on the calibrated field uniformity data.

All tests were performed four times, with the antenna facing each of the four sides of the EUT. Each

test was performed for both, horizontal and vertical antenna polarization

During the tests, the EUT and external equipment were monitored to verify normal functional

performance.

Pic.6.2.2. The EUT placed in a full-anechoic chamber.

of 74

6.2.3. Results:

6.2.3.1. Radiated Immunity 80MHz - 1GHz

Table 6.2.3.1. Pre-Test (Before the start of stage of tests Radiated Immunity on range 80MHz -

1GHz )

of 74

a)

Table 6.2.3.1.1.

Fig. 6.2.3.1.1.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]

Deviation measurements while changing the frequency


of 74

Table 6.2.3.1.2.

Fig. 6.2.3.1.2.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.1.3.

Fig. 6.2.3.1.3.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.1.4.

Fig. 6.2.3.1.4.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.1.5.

Fig. 6.2.3.1.5.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.1.6.

Fig. 6.2.3.1.6.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

6.2.3.2. Radiated Immunity 1.4GHz – 2.7GHz

(AM, 80%; 1kHz; 10V/M)

Table 6.2.3.2. Pre-Test (Before the start of stage of tests Radiated Immunity on range 80MHz -

1GHz )

of 74

Table 6.2.3.2.1.

Fig. 6.2.3.2.1.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.2.2.

Fig. 6.2.3.2.2.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.2.3.

Fig. 6.2.3.2.3.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.2.4.

Fig. 6.2.3.2.4.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.2.5.

Fig. 6.2.3.2.5.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.2.3.2.6.

Fig. 6.2.3.2.6.

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

The loss of product functionality is not detected.

Test Passed.

6.2.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Immunity to Radiated

Electromagnetic Field the according to IEC 61000-4-3 standard.


of 74

6.3. RE02 Radiated Emission, Electric Fields 14 kHz to 10000 MHz

6.3.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Radiated

Emission the according to the MIL-STD-462 C.

This standard establishes general techniques for use in the measurement and

determination of the electromagnetic emission and susceptibility characteristics of electronic,

electrical, and electromechanical equipment and subsystems designed or procured for use by

activities and agencies of the Department of Defense.

6.3.2. Experiment

UUT are set in the Operating mode and checked by different types of antennas depending on

the frequency range under test: 10 kHz to 30 MHz, 104 cm rod with impedance matching network EMCO 3301B

30 MHz to 200 MHz, Biconical, 137 cm tip to tip, Schwarzbeck VHBB9124 w/BBA9106

200 MHz to 1GHz Log periodic Schwarzbeck VUSLP9111

1GHz – 18 GHz DRG-118/A

Pic.6.3.2. UUT on Operating mode into Camber whit different types of antennas

of 74

6.3.3. Results

UUT-1 (Monitor RAM-R200 + Detector Rp-10): in the frequency range of 30MHz to

90MHZ spikes found (38MHz, 40MHz, 44MHz) with peaks 40 dBuV/m.

The cause of the fall was UUT-1 damage to the RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400)

shield. This problem is fixed by adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter (ferrite number -

0444164281)

Pic. 6.3.3. RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400) with Ferrite Filter (0444164281)

After adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter UUT-1 passed the test successfully.

All other UUT passed the test successfully.

Test Passed.

6.3.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Radiated Emission the

according to the MIL-STD-462 C.

Possible damage to the cable shield of RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400) ,

which do not affect the work of the tested Instruments, but the cause of Radiated Emission.

For fix this problem by adding Ferrite Filter.


6.3.5. Solution:

a) Develop a methodology for testing cables RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400.)

serviceability

b) Develop a version of the cable RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400) with ferrite filter.

of 74

6.4. RS03 Radiated Susceptibility, Electric Field, 14 kHz to 18 GHz

6.4.1. Scope

This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Radiated

Susceptibility the according to the MIL-STD-462 C.

The radiated susceptibility test is performed to determine a device's ability to operate

in the presence of an external interference signal propagated via free space.

6.4.2. Experiment

A transmit antenna is placed in front of the EUT's most susceptible RF pickup area at

the separation distance prescribed by the test specification.

The EF(Electric Field) is established at the specified frequencies using a signal

generator and an RF power amplifier to drive the transmit antenna. Used the suite of signal

generators, power amplifiers, and antennas to cover the entire frequency range.

Pic. 6.4.2. UUT on Operating mode into Camber whit different types of antennas

of 74

6.4.3. Results

Table 6.4.3. Pre-Test (Before the start of stage of tests Radiated Susceptibility)

of 74

Table 6.4.3.1. Horizontal Polarization -- from 30 MHz to 1GHz

* Problem identified RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400). The problem fixed by adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter. (ferrite number -0444164281). Retest with Ferrite Filter: PASSED

of 74

Graph 6.4.3.1. Horizontal Polarization -- from 30 MHz to 1GHz

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.4.3.2. Vertical Polarization -- from 30 MHz to 1GHz

of 74

Fig. 6.4.3.2. Vertical Polarization -- from 30 MHz to 1GHz

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.4.3.3. Horizontal Polarization -- from 1 GHz to 10 GHz

of 74

Fig. 6.4.3.3. Horizontal Polarization -- from 1 GHz to 10 GHz

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

500 1500 2500 3500 4500 5500 6500 7500 8500 9500 10500

Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.4.3.4. Vertical Polarization-- from 1 GHz to 10 GHz

of 74

Fig. 6.4.3.4. Vertical Polarization-- from 1 GHz to 10 GHz

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

500 2500 4500 6500 8500 10500

Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

Table 6.4.3.5. From 40 kHz to 30 MHz

of 74

Fig. 6.4.3.5. From 40 kHz to 30 MHz

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Erro

r [%

]

Frequency [MHz]



of 74

6.4.3. Results:

On Frequency range 30-1000 MHz, Horizontal antenna polarization the UUT-1

(Monitor-1(RAM R-200) + Detector-8 (RP-100)) switched to Calibration mode. After Reset

UUT return to normal operation. Problem identified RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-

0400). The problem fixed by adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter. (See Sec.6.3.3 and

Pic.6.3.3)

After adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter UUT-1 passed the test successfully.

All other UUT passed the test successfully.

Test Passed.

6.4.4. Conclusion

The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Radiated Susceptibility

the according to the MIL-STD-462 C.


6.4.5. Solution: See Sec.6.3.5.

of 74

END OF REPORT

PA-100 RP-10 RAM R-200 … · Tuesday, December 27, 2016 PA-100 RP-10 RAM R-200 Report on the...

Documents

Transcript of PA-100 RP-10 RAM R-200 … · Tuesday, December 27, 2016 PA-100 RP-10 RAM R-200 Report on the...