REDD+ in agricultural landscapes: evidence from Ghana’s REDD+
P2.3. Research partnerships on climate change mitigation through REDD+ and the interactions with...
-
Upload
gcard-conferences -
Category
Documents
-
view
254 -
download
0
Transcript of P2.3. Research partnerships on climate change mitigation through REDD+ and the interactions with...
Research partnership on climate change mitigation through REDD+ and the interactions
with agriculture
Almeida Sitoe Department of Forestry, Eduardo Mondlane University,
Maputo, Mozambique
Second Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD2) Punta del Este, Uruguay, 29 October – 1 November 2012
Objective of the presentation
• Present joint work with CIFOR which was initiated through national level stakeholder processes in Mozambique
• Present the interface involving a CGIAR Center, national institutions, academia and civil society
• Present the role of actors at all levels in relation to emerging policy options, particularly REDD+
• Present early results and how these are influencing policy development in Mozambique
Introduction
• Mozambique is one of the countries in Southern Africa with high forest cover
• Deforestation is high (0.58% per year and increasing)
• About 80% of the GHG emissions are from agriculture land forest mand use
• Therefore engaged on REDD+ as an opportunity to reduce emissions while improving SFM
The REDD+ Process in Mozambique
• Coordination by the Ministry of Environment (MICOA) and the Ministry of Agriculture (MINAG)
• Funding provided by the Norwegian Government• South-South Collaboration: to develop the initial ideas of
REDD+ at national level (since 2009)– A group of Mozambican Institutions
• Eduardo Mondlane University (UEM)• Centro Terra Viva (CTV)
– Amazonia Sustainable Foundation (FAF) - Brazil– International Institute fo Environment and Development (IIED) -
UK– Indufor - Finland
Global Comparative studies on REDD+• 12 countries: Brazil, Bolivia, Cameroon, Democratic Republic
of Congo (DRC), Indonesia, Nepal, Peru, Tanzania, Vietnam, Papua New Guinea (PNG), Mozambique, and Burkina Faso
• The goal of the study is to influence REDD+ design and implementation at three scales:– Local: Site and landscape project activities, including methods for
community-based monitoring – National: Development of strategies and policies, including
scenarios for national reference levels– Global: REDD architecture in the global post-2012 climate-
protection agreement
Source of Funds
Early results for Mozambique
• Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation–Wood energy–Agriculture–Unsustainable logging–Mining
Underlying causes of Agriculture-related deforestation
• Subsistence agriculture (food production)• Limited access to technologies• Slash-and-burn agriculture• Of the 800,000 cash crop growers, 99%
are smallholders covering >243.000 ha (76% of the cash crop area) (2009-2010)
Underlying factors for deforestation and forest degradation
• Demographic factors - population growth, density, and urbanization
• Technological factors – low productivity agriculture
• Economic factors – export commodities (sesame, tobacco, cotton, timber)
• Institutional factors – weak institutional capacity
Implications for REDD+
• Land ownership insecurity may promote further deforestation
• Most vulnerable people may be negatively affected
• Need to define Forest and Carbon rights
Comparative results:REDD+ process ownership
• REDD+ process is driven by domestic actors, high national ownership over their REDD+ process, there is strong coalition building among state and non-state actors in support of REDD+–Mozambique, Brazil, Indonesia Peru,
Vietnam
Comparative studies:Governance and institutional setup
• Weak governance and institutional set-ups such as functioning multi-level governance system and effectiveness of forest legislation, policy and governance–Mozambique, PNG, Nepal, Indonesia,
Burkina Faso, DRC
How are the results influencing processes at national level
• Climate Change Policies
• Cross-sector coordination
• Agriculture• Forestry• Land issues
• Training and Capacity Building
• Research
• Public Consultation• Civil Society
engagement• Private sector
participation CTV(+ IIED,
FAS)UEM
MICOAMINAG
REDD+ Policies
REDD+ PilotingNational REDD+ Reference Level
National REDD+ Strategy
CIFOR
Thank you!