P2.2

11
Road to SCHEVENINGEN towards a sustainable tourism desnaon P2.2 Presentaon by Amy Ikha Yan Santoso (4120663) Delta Intervenon Studio 15 February 2012

description

My third presentation of graduation studio. It serves as a complement to the previous presentation, where I provide the first step design on the Scheveningen Harbour area.

Transcript of P2.2

Page 1: P2.2

Road to SCHEVENINGENtowards a sustainable tourism destination

P2.2 Presentation by

Amy Ikha Yanti Santoso (4120663)

Delta Intervention Studio

15 February 2012

Page 2: P2.2

PREVI OUSLY the last presentation

PROJECTAIMS harbour’s vibrant urban life with strong place identity

?This project is about:Designing a attractive, vibrant and economic profitable mixed-use development in Scheveningen Harbour, along with new public transport connection from The Hague. This project mainly deals with accessibility with public transport on city scale and harbour area, as well as spatial quality on harbour area.

1 4 km0

Main Stops

Other Stops

LRT Line

BRT Line

Museum Kwartier

Kijkduin

City Centre

Central Station

Hollands Spoor

Harbour

Village

Boulevard

SPATIAL PLANNINGBus Rapid Transit (BRT)

+ Light Rapid Transit (LRT) option 1

cost

P+R to Boulevard

destination

total track

new on-groundtrack

new undergroundtrack

altered current track

new elevatedtrack

Page 3: P2.2

TIME LINE project course for the next six months

No. Activity Methodology1 Theoretical Framework

2 Analysis on City Scale3 Preliminary Spatial Planning4 Choosing the Most Suitable

Combination (LRT+BRT)5 Assessment and Comparison with

Municipality's PlanInterview with Rob van Nes (Traffic Engineer); analysis and calculation on spatial and economic impacts, as well as Scheveningen's accessibilitylevel

6 Design Execution in Harbour Area Important factors in the design execution: creation of vibrant public space, safe harbour area, maximization of economic potentiality (living,leisure and industry), improvement of connectivity and accessibility, especially by public transport. Moreover, there are also interview with Evertvan den Hoek (Concire Consultant, who handles development in Scheveningen Harbour), Ad van der Toorn and Mark Voorendt (Coastal Engineer),theoretical framework by Jan Gehl (New City Life: design of active public space), case study of Bristol and Valletta (diversification of program,density, FAR)

7 Analysis of Spatial Condition and Accessibility in Harbour Area

Three-step analysis, space syntax (topological and metrical), spatial quality, place to sit and stand, building and block morphology, program,building age, accessibility to waterfront area

8 Assignation and Exploration of Three Different Development Scenarios

The scenarios are: Living in the Harbour, Harbour as the Entertainment District and combination of them both

9 Choosing the Most Suitable Scenario for Harbour Area

Assessment criteria involved: economic profitability, accessibility level (especially with public transport: time, provision of direct route), spatialquality (attractiveness and vibrancy of public space)

10 P3 Presentation of the chosen scenario, along with spatial planning on city scale, with overview of analysis on harbour area, final version of threedevelopment scenarios and their assessment, as well as sections

11 Further Design Exploration of the Chosen Plan

Assignation of sitting, standing place, private-public space classification, slow-moving traffic area, child-friendly area, humane public scale; withstudy model 1:400, theoretical framework by Jan Gehl (Life Between Building: factors involved in vibrant public space creation)

12 Calculation and Designation of Program Amount and Cost Involved

Interview with Hans de Jonge (Real Estate and Management) to provide assistance in establishing economic calculation

13 Choosing the Detailed Design Area The most interesting spot, which may be the waterfront area or the reclaimed area14 P4 Presentation of final master plan in harbour area, economic calculation with final study model, sections and 3D perspectives, with overview of

analysis, as well as preliminary detailed plan15 Further Design Exploration of the

Detailed PlanStudy model 1:200, assignation of material, vegetation and other details

16 Making of Final Presentation Material Wooden model of the detailed plan, section and 3D perspectives of the detailed plan, slides presentation with project overview and designintervention

17 P5 Wooden model of the detailed plan, section and 3D perspectives of the detailed plan, slides presentation with overview and design intervention

Page 4: P2.2

200 800 m0

Industry

Shop

Restaurant

Monument

Marina

Playground

Parking Area

Residential Buildings

New Industrial Buildings

New Beach Volleyball Stadium

New Residential Buildings

ANALYSISprogram now and planned

Page 5: P2.2

PROBLEMSTATEMENT design assignment

1. Low connectivity 2. Unattractive route 3. Unsafe area

4. Inhuman scale

200 800 m0

Industry

Dike

200 800 m0

Industry

Shop

Restaurant

Monument

Marina

Playground

Parking Area

Residential Buildings

New Industrial Buildings

New Beach Volleyball Stadium

New Residential Buildings

Page 6: P2.2

DESIGNPROPOSAL intention

1. High connectivity 2. Attractive route 3. Safe area

4. Human scale

200 800 m0

Industry

Dike

First Step

Second Step

Third Step

200 800 m0

Page 7: P2.2

SCENARIO #1living in the harbour

Page 8: P2.2

SCENARIO #2harbour as the entertainment district

Page 9: P2.2

SCENARIO #3combination of both

Page 10: P2.2

ASSESSMENT criteria for scenario assessment

No. Criteria Description1 Economic pro�tability Construction cost and possible capital gain, spatial quality improvement as an impact of the new development, what the

future residents, workers and visitors gain with the new programs and spatial condition, what are the possible public activity and vibrancy that may take place as a development result

2 Accessibility level Accessibility level in the harbour area, especially by public transport (travel time, passenger capacity, connection to key development), as well as accessibilty in/around harbour area by bike, foot and car. Furthermore, which scenario provides more pedestrian area and more direct access to waterfront.

3 Spatial quality Which scenario provides the most attractive waterfront area, public space and key development. Which scenario provides the right amount of density to encourage public space vibrancy, without overcrowding or making the area becomes over touristic

Page 11: P2.2

EXPECTEDPRODUCT

Master plan on harbour area Detailed plan on neighbourhood scale

Spatial planning on city scale1 4 km0

Main Stops

Other Stops

LRT Line

BRT Line

Museum Kwartier

Kijkduin

City Centre

Central Station

Hollands Spoor

Harbour

Village

Boulevard

SPATIAL PLANNINGBus Rapid Transit (BRT)

+ Light Rapid Transit (LRT) option 1

cost

P+R to Boulevard

destination

total track

new on-groundtrack

new undergroundtrack

altered current track

new elevatedtrack

1. 2.

3.