P1.2. Research on Agriculture for Improved Nutrition
-
Upload
gcard-conferences -
Category
Documents
-
view
405 -
download
1
description
Transcript of P1.2. Research on Agriculture for Improved Nutrition
Research on Agriculture for Improved Nutrition
• Background• Potential for agricultural change to improve nutrition and...• Increasing interest in agriculture-nutrition but... • Evidence base poor - 2 systematic reviews (Masset et al, 2011, Girard et
al, 2012) reveal little evidence of impact & a need for more & better designed research
• Need to determine pattern, design & direction of current research to inform future funding
• DFID commission: • Mapping and gap analysis of current and planned research• Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health
(LCIRAH)• Centre for Sustainable International Development (CSID) at University of
Aberdeen• Report submitted August 2012
Methodology/ Research Process
• Conceptual framework linking agriculture, food and nutrition
• Template for data collection & inclusion criteria• List of relevant organisations to contact (n=135)• Final list of eligible projects (n=151) • Completion of template – project team &/or
researchers• Mapping and gap analysis.• Information collected between April and August 2012. • Overseen by Expert Panel
Research chain for agriculture and nutrition
Agricultural practices e.g. cropping/ horticultural/ fish/ animal raising practices, input use, time allocation
Agricultural inputs e.g. crops/ animal/ fish breeding, technology, fertilisers, irrigation
Food value chain e.g. storage, processing, distribution, retailing
Agricultural interventions/ practices
Food consumption & intake e.g. household food expenditure, food consumption & dietary diversity; individual food & nutrient intake & dietary diversity; infant & young child feeding practices
Impacts/ outcomes related to nutrition
Health care & education e.g. national investment in services, household practices
Health/ education status & wellbeing
Economic outcome e.g. household income, national growth
Indirect impacts/ intervening factors
Clim
ate
& E
nvi
ron
men
t
Culture, Gender & Equity
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
farmers, agricultural workers, (pregnant) women, children, infants, populations in fragile states/humanitarian crises, urban
consumers, other high risk groups
Food environment availability, nutrient quality, affordability, acceptability
Policy & Governance Po
litical & E
con
om
ic Co
ntext, e
.g. fra
gile
/ stab
le sta
te, h
um
an
itaria
n situ
atio
n
(anthropometry and biomarkers)
Developed to define pathways by which agriculture may contribute to nutrition directly and indirectly
Helpful for characterizing individual research projects as well as identifying gaps in the research overall
Conceptual Framework
Realigning Agriculture for Improved Nutrition (RAIN)
Agricultural practices Establish smallholder model farmers (SMFs) - homestead gardening, small-scale animal husbandry.
Agricultural inputs Vegetable seeds & small animals provided at the beginning then farmers are supported to generate their own inputs later on .
Food value chainLinkages to markets & potentially to micro-finance services
Agricultural interventions/ practices
Food consumption & intake Aims to improve consumption (diversity & quantity) of nutritious foods. Measures: Household Hunger Scale & Household Dietary Diversity Score, IYCF in first 2 yrs
Impacts/ outcomes related to nutrition
Health care & education Use of health services, maternal knowledge of HIV, child feeding, health seeking and nutrition
Health/ education status & wellbeing Child health (health card, vaccination status, de-worming, vitamin A, incidence of child illness) & maternal health, e.g. BMI
Economic outcome Maternal involvement in income-earning work, remuneration for work, use of loans for agricultural purposes
Indirect impacts/ intervening factors
Cli
mat
e &
En
viro
nm
ent:
No
Culture, Gender & Equity: Yes - aims for improved gender equality awareness & practices
NUTRITIONAL STATUSTarget: children < 2, pregnant/lactating
women in one district in Zambia. Aims to reduce prevalence of chronic malnutrition
among young children & improve nutritional status of pregnant & lactating women.
Measures: Prevalence of stunting <5 yrs (HAZ scores), prevalence of wasting (WAZ,
WHZ)
Food environment Aims to improve availability of and access to sufficient quality foods. Not clear how measured.
Policy & Governance: Yes - aims to produce coordination between agriculture & health sectors & shared goal of nutrition
Po
litical & E
con
om
ic Co
ntext: N
o
Sustainable Production of Underutilized Vegetables to Enhance Rural Food Security
Agricultural practices Conducting on-farm experiments of different indigenous /underutilised vegetables
Agricultural inputs Selecting & evaluating different indigenous /underutilised vegetables , including for nutritional quality
Food value chainDetailed value-chain analyses for promising species, e.g. testing packaging technologies & determining market potential
Agricultural interventions/ practices
Food consumption & intake
Not measured
Impacts/ outcomes related to nutrition
Health care & education No
Health/ education status & wellbeing
No
Economic outcome Looking at the economic empowerment of women
Indirect impacts/ intervening factors
Cli
mat
e &
En
viro
nm
ent:
Yes
–lo
okin
g a
t the
impa
ct o
f cro
p di
vers
ifica
tion
on th
e en
viro
nmen
t
Culture, Gender & Equity: Yes - project is about economic empowerment of women
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
Not measured
Food environment Measures: indigenous /underutilised vegetables use, distribution & nutritional quality.
Policy & Governance: No
Po
litical & E
con
om
ic Co
nte
xt: No
Mapping: overview of project funding & organisational arrangements
• Significant majority (133/ 151) part of larger programme or funding initiative (e.g. CGIAR A4NH)
• Multiple funders reported (46 in total), but dominated by 5 (BMGF, CIDA, IDRC, USAID, DFID)
• One third (n=57) led by CGIAR centres• Lead organisations international or North
America/ Europe• Almost all included LMIC organisation as a partner
Mapping: overview of project types & focus
• Sub-Saharan Africa focus of 93/151. South Asia next with 36.
• Emphasis on women and children (‘1000 days’) & rural poor/ farmers
• Very few projects targeted urban populations or men as a specific group
Category Theme Number of projects
Agricultural production of nutritious* foods Biofortification (crop breeding) 17
Agricultural development/technology 15
Traditional/indigenous/local foods 11
Home gardening/homestead production 11
Aquacultural technology development 7
Other 6
Agrobiodiversity 5
Total 66
Value chains Of nutritious* foods 12
Specific to biofortification 10
Not specified 2
Total 24
Agricultural growth/ development more broadly 21
Multi-sectoral nutrition projects that include agriculture 7
Reducing/ understanding impact of aflatoxin contamination 4
Policy, research, data and methodology Governance/capacity building/policy analysis 6
Development of methodology 4
Collection/analysis of datasets 5
Total 15
Other/ not known 14
Grand total 151
Gap analysis: conclusions• Whole research chain – research that considers the full pathway of change
from agricultural inputs, practices, value chains, food environment to nutrition outcomes; a significant number of projects do not consider the value chain
• Indirect effect of changes in agriculture on nutrition, through income and economic growth and associated changes in health and investments in health and education services
• Effects of agricultural policy on nutrition as mediated through the value chain• Governance, policy processes and political economy as it relates to the
development of agriculture-for-nutrition policies and programmes, the ability to implement them (and scale up) and for them to achieve their stated goals once implemented.
• The way research on agriculture and nutrition is conducted, such as the development of methodologies and appropriate metrics
• Consumers as a broader target group, notably rural workers and non-rural populations
• The rural and urban poor at risk from nutrition-related non-communicable diseases
• Cost-effectiveness