Owner Organization for Successful Project Outcomes · Facilitator: D. Kirk Hamilton, FAIA, FACHA,...

38
1 Healthcare Infrastructure Research A Program of the University Research Institute 2015 White Paper Program Title: Owner Organization for Successful Project Outcomes Mission: The most important stakeholder, by far, in the process of shaping healthcare infrastructure is the Owner. And yet, most Owners don’t effectively exert the project controls available to them. How Owners organize their internal decision and accountability structure is perhaps the single most critical element in producing successful project outcomes. This research team has documented strategies proven to be effective. Facilitator: D. Kirk Hamilton, FAIA, FACHA, EDAC Professor of Architecture, Texas A&M University Introduction Project success is the result of multiple factors, including the original conception of the need for a project and the subsequent performance of the design and construction components of the team. Especially important, however, is the Owner’s commitment and organization of the project. Healthcare construction is complex, expensive, and usually represents a significant segment of an organization’s capital investment. Predictions suggest healthcare construction completed in 2015 should exceed $1.04 trillion (Silvis, 2015). This white paper seeks to shed light on the strategies adopted by successful Owners and identifies twelve themes that consistently arose from interviews with industry experts. Methodology Twelve experts were interviewed individually by telephone for 45 to 60 minutes between May and July, 2015 and recorded using an Olympus VN-702PC digital recorder. The recordings were then professionally transcribed. The facilitator made notes during the

Transcript of Owner Organization for Successful Project Outcomes · Facilitator: D. Kirk Hamilton, FAIA, FACHA,...

  • 1

    HealthcareInfrastructureResearch

    AProgramoftheUniversityResearchInstitute

    2015WhitePaperProgram

    Title: OwnerOrganizationforSuccessfulProjectOutcomesMission: Themostimportantstakeholder,byfar,intheprocessofshapinghealthcare

    infrastructureistheOwner.Andyet,mostOwnersdon’teffectivelyexerttheprojectcontrolsavailabletothem.HowOwnersorganizetheirinternaldecisionandaccountabilitystructureisperhapsthesinglemostcriticalelementinproducingsuccessfulprojectoutcomes.Thisresearchteamhasdocumentedstrategiesproventobeeffective.

    Facilitator: D.KirkHamilton,FAIA,FACHA,EDAC ProfessorofArchitecture,TexasA&MUniversity

    Introduction

    Projectsuccessistheresultofmultiplefactors,includingtheoriginalconceptionofthe

    needforaprojectandthesubsequentperformanceofthedesignandconstruction

    componentsoftheteam.Especiallyimportant,however,istheOwner’scommitmentand

    organizationoftheproject.Healthcareconstructioniscomplex,expensive,andusually

    representsasignificantsegmentofanorganization’scapitalinvestment.Predictions

    suggesthealthcareconstructioncompletedin2015shouldexceed$1.04trillion(Silvis,

    2015).ThiswhitepaperseekstoshedlightonthestrategiesadoptedbysuccessfulOwners

    andidentifiestwelvethemesthatconsistentlyarosefrominterviewswithindustryexperts.

    Methodology

    Twelveexpertswereinterviewedindividuallybytelephonefor45to60minutesbetween

    MayandJuly,2015andrecordedusinganOlympusVN-702PCdigitalrecorder.The

    recordingswerethenprofessionallytranscribed.Thefacilitatormadenotesduringthe

  • 2

    conversationsandreplayedtherecordingstoclarifycontentandidentifyquotations.The

    followingquestionswereidentifiedbythefacilitatorandusedtoguidethediscussion:

    1. Pleaseprovideinformationaboutyourselfandyourexperiencewithmajorhealthcareprojects.

    2. TellmeaboutyourexperiencewithdifferentwaysinwhichtheOwnermanagedthedesignandconstructionprocess.Focusespeciallyonthedifferencesthatappeartohavecontributedtosuccessfulprojectsandthingsyouwouldchoosetododifferently.

    3. PleaselistwhatyoubelievetobethekeysuccessfactorsassociatedwitheffectivemanagementandcontrolonthepartoftheOwnerwithregardtomajordesignandconstructionprojects.

    4. Aretherespecificvalueswithintheorganization,andexpectedfromexternalconsultants,associatedwithsuccessfulprojects?

    5. Describetheidealrelationship,basedonyourexperience,betweentrusteesorgovernanceandsuccessfulprojects.

    6. Describetheidealrelationship,basedonyourexperience,betweentheC-suite(CEO,CFO,etc.)andsuccessfulprojects.

    7. DescribetheidealorganizationalpositionfortheOwner’sprojectleaderandtheirpreferredqualifications.

    8. Describeyouridealinternalteamandtheirassociatedexpertiseforprojectdelivery.9. Describeyouridealexternalteamandtheirassociatedexpertiseforproject

    delivery.Howaretheexternalconsultantsselected?10. Howdoesthedesignteaminteractwiththeactualandintendedusersofthespaces

    beingdesigned?11. Canyoupleasee-mailmeacopyofyourtypicalorpreferredprojectorgchart?12. Inwhatwaydoesasuccessfulprojectteameffectivelycommunicate?13. HowdoestheOwnerknowwhatisactuallyhappeningontheirproject?14. Onsuccessfulprojects,howdoestheinternalandexternalteamrespondto

    unanticipatedproblems?15. IsthereanythingelseyouwouldliketotellmeabouttheOwner’sorganizationfora

    successfulproject?

    Notallquestionswereaskedofeveryparticipant.Additionalinformationnotcoveredby

    thequestionswasgatheredviatopicsofinterestraisedbytheparticipants.Rough

    biographicaldataofeachparticipantwasgathered.Theintervieweeswereidentifiedbythe

  • 3

    AcademyforHealthcareInfrastructureandincludeleadersinthefieldofhealthcare

    administration,designandconstruction.Theparticipantswere:

    § JohnBecker,MHA,FACHE,FHFI;Director,FacilitiesDivision,DefenseHealthAgency.

    Johnspent29yearsasanArmyofficerwithabackgroundinhealthcareadministration,

    facilityplanning,andservedasamedicalevacuationhelicopterpilot.TheArmysent

    himtoearnamaster’sdegreeinhealthcareadministrationatBaylor.Heservedasthe

    COOofamilitaryhospitalandthenCEOofa400-beddeployablemilitaryhospital.Past

    facilitiesrelatedpositionsincludeDeputyCommanderoftheArmy’sHealthFacility

    PlanningAgencyandVPofFacilitiesfortheArmyMedicalDepartment.Afterretiringas

    aColonel,hewentontobecometheDirectoroftheDefenseHealthAgencyFacilities

    Division.

    § WilliamR.Calhoun,Jr.;ViceChairman,ClarkConstructionGroup.Billhasbeenwith

    Clarkfor32years.HiscivilengineeringdegreeisfromGeorgiaTech,afterwhichhe

    beganinestimatingandpurchasingwithacontractorinFlorida.HemovedtoBethesda

    toworkforGeorgeHymanConstruction,whichbecameClarkConstruction.His

    assignmentsmovedhimaround,includingconstructionofahospitalinTexas.More

    recently,hewasinvolvedinmajorprojectsattheBrookeArmyMedicalCenterinSan

    Antonio,andtheWalterReedNationalMilitaryMedicalCenter.

    § PeterR.Dawson,AIA;Sr.VP,FacilitiesServices,TexasChildren’sHospital.Petebegan

    hiscareerasatraditionalarchitectandconsultantservinghealthcareclients.30years

    agohebegantobeemployedbytheOwner,firstforasinglemajorprojectatHouston’s

    MethodistHospital.Hestayedontodevelopasophisticatedprogramoffacility

    planning,design,construction,andprojectdeliverytoaddressmultipleprojectsof

    differingtypes.Hehastakenthelessonslearnedalongthewaytohispositionwith

    TexasChildren’sHospitalandtheirsignificantcapitalprogram.

    § PatrickE.Duke;ManagingDirector,CBREHealthcare.Patrickearnedacivil

    engineeringdegreefromAuburnwhileworkingthroughschoolforaconstruction

  • 4

    managementfirmwithhospitalprojectsinTexasandVirginia.Hewantedtobeonthe

    Owner’ssideandlaterearnedamaster’sdegreeinlanddevelopmentfromTexasA&M.

    HebecameanOwner’sonsiterepresentativeforalargeprojectinNewJersey.His

    smallerfirmultimatelywasacquiredbyCBREandhedevelopedhisspecializationin

    healthcare.

    § SamGioldasis,PE;VicePresident,WalkerEngineering.SamhasbeenintheDallas-Fort

    Worthareasincecollege,andhashadavarietyofengineeringrolesassociatedwith

    hospitaldesignandconstruction.Earlyinhiscareerheservedaselectricalengineerof

    recordatChildren’sMedical,andhashadexperienceworkinginfirmsofconsulting

    mechanical,electrical,andplumbing(MEP)engineers,MEPcontractors,andcurrently

    worksforanelectricalcontractor.Themajorityofhiscareerhasbeeninelectrical

    contracting.

    § DougHarper,PE;Sr.ProgramManager,Gilbane.Dougearnedacivilengineering

    degreefromVMIandjoinedtheAirForcewhereheservedfor22yearsintheAirForce

    HealthFacilitiesprogram.TheAirForcesenthimtoN.C.Statewhereheearneddual

    master’sdegreesinconstructionmanagementandbusinessadministration.Doug

    workedonthe2005BaseRealignmentandClosure(BRAC)medicalfacilitiesplanning.

    Hislastmajormilitaryassignmentwasthe$1billionrecapitalizationoftheSanAntonio

    MilitaryHealthSystem.HejoinedGilbanein2015.

    § BrianHolmes;Sr.VP,FacilitiesDevelopment&RealEstate,TexasHealthResources.

    BrianearnedadegreeincivilengineeringandenteredtheNavyCivilEngineering

    Corps.HislasttourofdutyinvolvedrenovationoftheNavalHospitalinCorpusChristi,

    Texas.WhenlefttheNavy,hebecameaprojectmanagerforthePresbyterianHealth

    SysteminDallas,whichhasevolvedthroughmergersandacquisitionstobecomeTexas

    HealthResources,amajorregionalsystem.Brian’srolehasevolvedtobecomethe

    leaderofthesystem’sfacilityandrealestateactivity.

  • 5

    § JohnKouletsis,AIA,EDAC;VP,NationalFacilitiesServices,KaiserPermanente

    HealthPlan,Inc.Johnisalicensedarchitectwhobeganhiscareerwithhealthcare

    projectsinprivatepracticewithmultiplefirms,includingworkinJapan.Hewasinvited

    tobecomeaprojectmanageratKaiserandtransitiontotheOwner’ssidein1993.He

    becametheStandardsArchitect,puttingtogetherregionaldesignstandardstobecome

    NationalStandards.Johnhaseventuallybecomeanationalvicepresidentinchargeof

    planninganddesignforKaiserPermanente.

    § JudyQuasney,RA;Director,OfficeofWorkplaceSolutions,attheNationalInstituteof

    AllergyandInfectiousDiseases(NIAID)withintheNationalInstitutesofHealth(NIH).

    Asaclassicallytrainedarchitect,Judybeganhercareerintraditionalarchitecturalfirms

    withintheUnitedStatesandGermany.Since1992,shehasbeenafederalarchitectat

    NIHresponsibleforleadingateamdedicatedtorenovationswithintheresearch

    hospitalcomplexofNIH.In2003,sheshiftedherfocustoassistNIAIDleadershipwith

    developinghighcontainmentlaboratoriesaspartofanationalcampaigntopreparethe

    Americanpublicforapotentialbioterrorpublichealththreat.Herexperienceincludes

    biomedicallaboratoryplanning,design/constructionandfacilityoperations.Sheiswell

    versedinpatientcare,diagnosticandspecialtyareaswithinaresearchhospitalsetting.

    § BruceRaber,MAIBC,MRAIC;VP,PracticeLeaderHealth+Wellness,Stantec.Bruceis

    aCanadianarchitectwhohasspecializedinhealthcaredesignsince1988.Heisthe

    PracticeLeaderforStantec’sinternationalpracticeinHealth+Wellnesswhichincludes

    over800architects,engineers,designers,plannersandstrategistsinmultipleofficesin

    Canada,theUnitedStatesandoverseas.MuchofBruce’slargestandmostcomplex

    projectshavebeenCanadianPublicPrivatePartnership(P3)efforts,asinthemajor

    $600millionNorthIslandHospitalsprojectfortheVancouverIslandHealthAuthority.

    § JohnH.Rich,MHA;SeniorVP(retired),IntermountainHealthCare.Johnearneda

    master’sdegreeinhospitaladministrationfromUCLAandwenttoworkasafacility

    andsystemplannerwithIntermountainHealthCare(IHC).HecontinuedwithIHCin

    multiplerolesovertheyears,includingstintsastheadministratorofacoupleof

  • 6

    hospitals,timedevelopingthehealthmaintenanceorganizationnowknownasSelect

    Health,andstartingtheIHCphysiciandivision.Hespentthelastyearsofhiscareeras

    theseniorpersonresponsibleforfacilityplanninganddevelopment.

    § StephenWooldridge,PhD,PE,FACHE;VP,IntegratedRealEstate&Facilities,MedStar

    Health.StevewasintheROTCincollegeandbecameanofficerintheArmy’sMedical

    ServiceCorps.Servingasamedicalplanner,hebecameoneofthefirstbrigade

    engineersinamedicalbrigade,wherehewasinvolvedinthereplacementWomack

    ArmyMedicalCenteratFt.Bragg.Afteradoctorateinconstructionengineeringand

    managementfromMIT,heoversawmedicalfacilitiesinEurope,andleadershipofa

    clinicinGermany.Returningstateside,hewasinvolvedwiththeinsurancesideof

    militaryhealth,deployedtorunacombathospitalinIraq,andreturnedtocommand

    theArmy’sHealthFacilityPlanningAgency.SteverecentlyretiredasaColoneland

    joinedMedStarasavicepresidentwithfacilityresponsibility.

    § Facilitator:D.KirkHamilton,MSOD,B.Arch,FAIA,FACHA,EDAC;Professorof

    ArchitectureatTexasA&MUniversity.Kirkteacheshealthcaredesignatthegraduate

    level.Hisacademicresearchisabouttherelationshipofevidence-basedhealthfacility

    designtomeasurableorganizationalperformance.Heisafoundingprincipalemeritus

    ofWHRArchitects,andhasreceivedtheLifetimeAchievementAwardfromACHA.Heis

    co-editorofthepeer-reviewed,interdisciplinaryHERDJournal.Hismostrecentbooks

    includeRigor&Research-InformedDesign:ADecade’sAdvocacy(2013),Designfor

    CriticalCare:AnEvidence-BasedApproachwithco-authorMardelleShepley(2010),and

    Evidence-BasedDesignforMultipleBuildingTypeswithco-authorDavidWatkins(2009).

    ParticipantswereselectedbyJoePowell,theExecutiveDirectoroftheAcademyfor

    HealthcareInfrastructure.Eachsemi-structuredinterviewwasconductedusingthe

    methodsdescribedinJamesSpradley’sTheEthnographicInterview(1979),andanalyzed

    usingthemethodologydescribedinKathyCharmaz’sConstructingGroundedTheory

    (2006),whichinvolvesthecodingofinterviewcontentandthecategorizationofthese

    codesintothemes,untilsaturationisachievedandnonewconceptsareraised.Usinga

  • 7

    methoddescribedas‘memberchecks’byYvonnaLincolnandEgonGubainNaturalistic

    Inquiry(1985),theparticipantsweregiventheopportunitytocommentonandeditthe

    interviewtranscripts,themesthatemergedfromtheirinterviews,aswellasgivenan

    opportunitytoreviewandcommentonadraftofthepaper.Aconferencecallallowedthem

    todiscussadraftdocument.Thefollowingisasummaryoftheopinionsexpressedbythe

    participants.

    Discussion

    OrganizingforProjectSuccess:ADozenPrinciplesandSomeObservations

    Acollectionofconsistentthemesemergedfromtheinterviewswiththeseindustry

    experts.Thegroupproducedagroupofcompatiblesuggestionsandhadnodisagreements

    orminorityreports.

    Differentorganizationsmaydefineprojectsuccessintheirownway.Theclassic

    statementof‘ontimeandinthemoney’referstobudgetandschedulesuccess.Realsuccess

    maybemoreoftenrelatedtodeliveryofthedesiredscopeatthedesiredqualitylevel.

    TexasChildren’sPeteDawsonsuggestedthatstrivingforadependableoutcomeisdistinct

    fromtryingtodefineasuccessfuloutcomeinthefaceofshiftingprioritiesand

    circumstances.

    JohnKouletsisofKaiserPermanenteidentifiedseveralindicatorsofprojectsuccess.

    Itwillbeonorbelowbudget,anddeliveredonscheduleorearly.Moreimportantly,he

    said,thefinishedprojectwill“alignwiththeorganization’sstrategicvision,fulfillorexceed

    theintendedscope,meetorexceedtheneedsandaspirationsofthekeystakeholders,

    enhanceworkflowefficiency,allowfortheprovisionofthehighestqualityofcareprovided

    atanaffordableprice,andoperatedatthelowesttotalcostofownership.”Itwouldbe

    “flexibleandadaptabletofuturechanges”intechnologyanddeliverymodels.Sucha

    projectwouldbean“outcomes-baseddesign”thatdeliveredshorterlengthsofstay,no

    hospitalacquiredinfections,noworkplaceinjuries,andhighersatisfactionscores.Hewent

    ontosuggestsuccessmaybeindicatedbytransformativeexperiencesforpatients,families,

    clinicians,andstaff.

  • 8

    JohnBecker,theHealthDefenseAgency’sDirector,offeredsomethoughtson

    definingsuccessfulprojectoutcomes.Plan,developandoperatetherightfacilities–

    “appropriateandfiscallyresponsibleinfrastructuretomeettheMilitaryHealthService

    (MHS)readinessandmissionrequirements;”rightquality–“assureworld-classstandards

    aredevelopedandappliedtoprovideasafe,reliable,timely,responsive,andefficientMHS

    environmentofcare;”andrightresourcing–“balancerequirementsandresourcesto

    optimizeMHScostandtimeinvestmentinfacilitylifecyclecapitalmanagement,

    operations,andsharedservicesinfrastructure.”

    Dawsontalkedaboutputtinginplace“acontrolstructuretoeffectivelymanagethe

    projectscope,budget,andschedule”onbehalfoftheowner.Heindicatedthatcapital

    projectsconsistofsevensteps:1)pre-designorplanningwhichotherscallstrategic

    planningandfunctionalspaceplanning,2)fundingordevelopmentofthebusinesscase,3)

    design,4)bidorpurchase,5)construction,6)occupancy,and7)close-out.

    Figure1:CapitalProjectManagementProcess

    AdaptedfromDawson&TexasChildren’sHospital

    Anumberoftheparticipantsdiscussedanefforttostrategicallyalignthevision,

    merits,andanticipatedoutcomeoftheprojectinternallywithintheleadershipteamofthe

  • 9

    OwnerpriortocommencementofPre-Design.Thiseffort,calledStep0,establishesthe

    opportunityforinternalendorsementfromallfacetsoftheOwner’sorganizationtoensure

    alignmentandsupportfortheproject.DuringStep0,withintheOwner’sorganization,

    projectprioritiescanbedefinedaswellasestablishingoperationalandorganizational

    boundarieswhichcannotbereadilyillustratedbymerelyfunding,scope,ortime

    parameters.Theconcept,especiallyforgovernmentprojects,iscriticaltoensure

    transparencytoallinterestedparties.Throughcarefulreviewofstrategicalignmentand

    congruencewiththeorganization’shealthdeliverymodel,Step0setsthefoundationsfor

    commencementofPre-DesigninStep1.

    Figure2:DemandSignalProcessforEnterprise-LevelReview

    Courtesy:JohnBecker&DefenseHealthAgency

    JudyQuasney,DirectoroftheOfficeofWorkplaceSolutionsfortheNIHInstituteof

    Allergy&InfectiousDiseases,pointedouttheneedforthissortofearlyeffort,andBecker

    providedFigure2abovetoexplaintheDHAreviewprocesswhichprecedesdetailed

    planning.Gettingintothebudgetstreamoflargeorganizationsorgovernmententities

    requiresconsiderableformulationandthesettingofthoroughgroundwork.PatrickDuke,

  • 10

    managingdirectorofCBRE’shealthcarepractice,providedFigure3belowtofurther

    explainoneversionofaStep0whichhisorganizationdescribesasstrategicmasterfacility

    planning.

    Figure3:StrategicMasterFacilityPlanning

    Courtesy:PatrickDuke&CBRE

    Kouletsisandothersfeelthatapostoccupancyevaluation9to12monthsafter

    beneficialoccupancyshouldbean8thstep.Itisdifficulttogetmaximumbenefitfromthe

    potentiallessonsuponcompletionofanymajorprojectwithoutsomesortofinternalor

    independentexternalreviewoftheresults.Itmustbenotedthatsourcesofpostoccupancy

    feedbackoftenhavenotparticipatedinestablishingtheprojectprioritiesordidnot

    providedesigninput,andthustheirsubjectiveevaluationmustbefilteredthroughthis

    newlens.Ifperformedforthepurposeofresearch,anindependent,third-partyreview

    removesmostofthepotentialforbiasinthereport.Whenthedesignteamevaluatesits

    ownwork,thereisapossibilityofbiasaboutthebuilding’sperformance.

    Evaluationofaprojectafteroccupancycanprovideimportantfeedbackthatcan

    benefitsubsequentcapitalprojects,andifshared,canbenefitthefield.Shepley(2011)calls

    it‘healthfacilityevaluation’andnotestheshiftfromthelanguageof‘post-occupancy

  • 11

    evaluation’tobuildingperformanceevaluation(Preiser,2002).Buildingperformanceisan

    importantaspectofevaluationwhentheOwnerisconcernedaboutoutcomes.Quasneyhas

    providedFigure4belowwhichdescribesaStep8asOperationalReadiness.

    Figure4:EnhancedCapitalProjectManagementProcess,withSteps0&8

    Courtesy:JudyQuasney

    Itisreasonabletosaythattheparticipantsinthisprocessfeelstronglythatthe

    Ownermustbeorganizedaroundaclearandconsistentprocessthatcanbemanaged.The

    Ownerwillneedanorganizationalstructuretomanagethecapitalprojectteamwithits

    multipleinternalcomponentsanditsexternalconsultants.

    Theparticipantsrecognizethattheremaybemultipleeffectivewaystoorganizethe

    overalldesignandconstructionteam,justastherearemultiplecombinationsofinternal

    andexternalmembersoftheseteams.Someorganizationswillhavemoreinternal

    resourcesformanagingcapitalprojectsthanothers.Thecombinationsofteammembers

    mayvaryfromoneprojecttoanother.Thereportingrelationshipsmaybedifferentwithin

    somedesignandconstructionteams.DukeprovidedthefollowingFigure5asageneric

    organizationstructureillustratingoneversionofpossiblereportingrelationships.

  • 12

    Figure5:TypicalOrganizationChartforaMajorCapitalProject

    Courtesy:PatrickDuke&CBRE

    Acollectionofguidingprinciplesemergedfromtheinterviewsandgroup

    conversations.Thethemeslistedbelowasprinciplesrepresentthecombinedopinionsof

    theparticipantsaboutthedesignandconstructionprocess,asexpressedduringthe

    interviews.Afewrelevantobservationsarealsoincluded.

    Principles

    Principle1: Visiononthepartoftheownerisshared

    TheOwnermusthaveavisionfortheproject.Differentvisionsfortheschedule,

    economy,andqualityoftheproject;andofthecaredelivered,value,ordesiredoutcomes

    oftheprojectshouldproducedifferentprojectresults.Aprojectvisionisthereforeneeded

    toclarifytheintentionsoftheownerbeforeanyworkonspecificdesigncanbegin.Itis

    importanttonotethatwithamulti-headedowner,theownermaynothaveasinglevision

  • 13

    andthevisionscould,andoftenare,inconflictwithoneanother.Theseissuesmustbe

    resolved,atleastonaconceptuallevel,beforetheprojectcaneffectivelymoveforward.

    Makingknowntheexpectationsanddesiresofkeyplayersinthedeliveryofthe

    projectisofcriticalimportancesothatpropermomentum,supportandoverallfocuscan

    bemaintainedbytheOwner’steam.Thedesignconsultantsandtheconstructorsneedto

    beclearaboutwhatprojectsuccesslookslikefromtheirrespectiveperspectives.Unless

    theseexpectationsforsuccessareclear,andthereisgeneralagreementthattheyare

    achievable,theprojectwillbehamperedfromamisalignedOwner’steam.

    Kouletsisdeclaredthat“TheOwner’svisionmustbeinwritingandopento

    adjustmentastheOwnerandotherteammembersencounterchallengesandopportunities

    intheproject.”HeseestheOwner’svisionasalivingdocumentthatisrefinedastheproject

    evolves.Itwillgrowandadaptastheprojectgoesthoughrealworldadjustmentsand

    changes.Manythingsmaychangeduringthecourseofaprojectimpactinghowthecore

    visionisachieved.Dawson,however,wishestowarnagainstacceptinganOwner’sfailure

    tomaintaindisciplineandrigor,whichcanleadtounsuccessfulprojectoutcomes.The

    OwnerandentireteammustunderstandthatthevisiondefinedatStep0willguideall

    decisionsastheprojectencountersinevitablerealworldcomplicationsandconflicts.This

    isonekeytoeffectiveprojectdelivery.

    TheOwner’svisionmustbeclearandexplicitlyunderstandable.Thevisionofthe

    Owner’sleadershipshouldbestatedsimplyinafashionthatleavesnoroomformultiple

    interpretations.JohnRich,retiredfromIntermountainHealthCare(IHC)hassaid“aproject

    isnobetterthanhowwellitsownerarticulatesit,becauseiftheycannotarticulateit

    accurately,precisely,andhavedefinitevisionaboutit,itwon’tcomeoffthepreciseway

    thattheOwnerenvisioned.”BillCalhounofClarkConstructiondeclaresthat“theOwner’s

    visionmustbeassociatedwithclearmetricsdefiningmeasuresofsuccess.”

    TheOwner’svisionmustbeunderstoodbyeveryoneateverylevel.Theowner’s

    visionshouldbesharedwitheverymemberoftheteamandmustbeclearand

    understandable.Thisvisionwillultimatelyguideprojectdecisionsatmanylevels.Itwill

    alsoserveasthe‘truenorth’oftheprojectandshouldbeconsultedfrequentlytoensure

    theprojectremainstruetoitsvisionandgoals.Thisisparticularlycriticaliftheproject

    encountersdifficultiesthatcouldresultinachangeinprojectscopeorbudgetadjustment.

  • 14

    Eachsystemhasitsowncomplexitiesandmultiplestakeholderswhoneedtofocusonthe

    sharedvisionandgoals.

    SteveWooldridge,recentlyretiredfromtheArmy’sHealthFacilityPlanningAgency

    andnowaVicePresidentforrealestateandfacilitieswiththeMedStarHealthsystem,

    reportedthat“wherewehavethegreatestsuccessisifwecometoacommon

    understandingandacommongoal.Thegoalisnotaboutthebuildingsomuchas

    appreciatingthatwe’reabouttobringafunctioninghospitalonline.”Hewentontodeclare

    that“ifyoucangetalignmentaroundthatsingularideawiththewholeprojectdelivery

    team,thatpavesthewaybecausethenyouhaveatruepartnership.That’sreallywhereit

    starts.”

    Envisioningthefuturebeginswithastrategicplan.Aprojectvisionshouldbein

    alignmentwiththeorganization’soverallstrategicplanandcaredeliveryplan.Duke

    believesthatorganizationsandsystemsneedto“utilizerealestateandfacilitiesasatoolto

    carryouttheirmission,”withthefirststepbeingdevelopmentofasolidstrategicplan.The

    masterplanmustsuittheintendedstrategy,andthespecificprojectproposalmustbe

    supportedbyawell-craftedbusinessplan.

    NIH’sQuasneyworkstogetalltheinternalandexternalpartiesinvolvedinorderto

    havesomesharedvisionandacceptanceofwhatistohappen.Sheinvolvesherself“to

    makesurethatthevisionandtheagreementbytheseniorleadershipinthestrategic

    planningphaseisnotcompromised.”Quasneysaidthevision“needstobecomprehensive

    andlasting.”

    Bewareofresistancetochange.DougHarper,SeniorProgramManagerfor

    Gilbane,pointedouthowindividualsandculturesmayoftenberesistanttochange.If

    majorprojectsaresubjectedtonewanddifferentdeliverymethods,orinvolvedwith

    significantinnovation,theremaybeopenorhiddenroadblockstoovercome.Sharinga

    compellingvisionmayrequirehardworktodriveitdowntothelowestlevelsofthe

    internalandexternalprojectteams.

    Harperdescribedanexampleinwhichtheleadershipvisionrequiredabigchange,

    but“theenterprisejustcouldn’tturnonadime”andresultswerelessthanideal.Becker

    tellsusthat“Changemanagementinparticularrequiresintensiveownerinvolvementand

    obviouslyeffectscostandschedule.”

  • 15

    Principle2: Clear,documentedprojectobjectives

    Theremustbespecificobjectivesfortheproject.Theinternalandexternalproject

    teamshouldhaveexplicitgoalsandobjectivesfortheirwork,withmetricsformostofthe

    objectivesthatpermitobjectiveperformanceevaluation.AccordingtoQuasney,“critical

    projectdecisionsandmilestonesarethefoundationofmeetingobjectives.”Thedesignand

    constructionteamcannotbeeffectivewithoutclearobjectivesthatprovideguidanceabout

    whattheOwnerexpectsfromtheirwork.Calhounmentionedtheneedforamajordecision

    timelinetoguidetheowneranduserleadership.

    Theprojectteammustbegivenclearstatementsofthemeasurableobjectives.

    Theobjectivesmustbeprovidedsothatteammemberscanbetreatedfairly,astheywork

    toaccomplishthem.“Thisclearlydocumentedscopeofworkandrangeofexpectationsfor

    success,”Kouletsisremindsus,“mustbealivingdocumentthattheteamcomesbackto

    againandagainduringthecourseoftheproject.”Heremindsusthatitshouldbe

    understoodthatitisgoodtohaveanunderstandingthatthedocumentwillberevisitedon

    aregularbasissotheentireteamcanverifythattheprojectcontinuestoadheretothe

    principlesandobjectiveslaidoutatthestart.“Suchadocumentcanserveasa‘guardrail’

    whentheprojectencountersdifficulties.Itwillguidethesettingofnewprioritiesin

    responsetoacrisisandhelpdeterminewhatis‘inbounds’andwhatis‘outofbounds’

    whenengaginginvalueengineering.”

    Theprojectteammustshareacommonlanguageabouttheirobjectives.Harper

    describedwaysinwhicheachparticipantmayhavehadtheirownwayofseeingthetask.

    Helikenedittodifferentplayersdescribingthesameelephantwhilelimitedintheirview

    becausenonecould“backofffarenoughornotlookthroughtheirownstrawtoseethe

    wholeelephant.”Eachteammember,bothinternalandexternal,mustcometosharethe

    samelanguagethatallowsacommoninterpretationoftheowner’svision.TheOwner’s

    leadershipshouldestablishandformallydocumentdefinitionsandguidingprinciplesfor

    theprojectasatooltoinformtheteam’sdecisionmaking.

  • 16

    Principle3: Qualified,experiencedstaff

    Leadersmayhavemultiplevariedbackgrounds.Projectleaderscanincludethose

    withbackgroundsfromarchitecture,engineering,construction,healthcareadministration,

    business,orfrommilitaryservice,amongothers.Someparticipantshavemovedfromone

    roletoanother.DawsonandKouletsis,forexample,bothwerearchitecturalpractitioners

    workingwithhealthcareprojectsbeforetheytransitionedtotheOwner’steam.Whatis

    importantistheirexperienceandjudgment.

    Beckerreportedthatthe“biggestfactorinsuccessseemstodependonthepeople

    ontheground,theteamandwhotheyare,howtheyworkandbuildtheirteam.”Quasney

    declaredthat“leadersneedtodeveloptrustedinterpersonalrelationshipswiththekey

    stakeholders.”

    Leadersshouldhavehadexperiencewithhealthcarecapitalprojects.Experience

    withlarge,complex,capitalprojectsforhealthcareorganizationsisanimportantcriterion

    forpersonsaskedtotakeleadershipresponsibilityforamajordesignandconstruction

    project.Harperobservedthat“peoplecometoaprojectwithwhattheirpastexperience

    hasbeen.”Eachteammemberwithaleadershiproleshouldhavetherelevantexperience

    necessaryforthemtomakeconfident,responsible,andtimelydecisionsattheirassigned

    levelwithintheproject’sorganizationalstructure.

    Itisusefultodocumentrolesandresponsibilitiesforallmembersoftheproject

    team.Itisnotuncommontohavealargenumberofplayers,especiallyontheowner'sside,

    whohavelittleornoexperienceinthedesign,construction,andcommissioningofa

    significantcapitalproject.Insomecases,theowner'sleadershipteammayhave

    insufficientknowledgeofthecapitalprojectprocess.Theteamshouldnotmoveforward

    untiltheseteammembershavebeenthoroughlybriefedontheirrole,responsibilities,and

    decisionrightsontheproject.Itissurprisinghowoftenkeymembersoftheteamarenew

    totheprocess.

    Internalstaffmustbeasskilledandexperiencedastheconsultantteam.Bruce

    Raber,theHealth+WellnesspracticeleaderforStantec,commentedthattheowner“needs

    tohavestaffthatareasgood,honestly,asourstaff,orasgoodasthecontractor’sstaff.”The

  • 17

    Owner’steammembersneedexperience,alongwithtechnicalskillsandinterpersonal

    skills.

    Raberfirmlybelieves“thebiggertheproject,themoresophisticatedandskilledthe

    Owner’sorganizationhastobe.”Dukepointedoutthatthefacilitymanagementprocessis

    notacorebusinessfunctionofthehospital,andthat“theworstthingpossibleisiftheytry

    tooperatethemlikeahospitaldepartmentratherthanabest-in-classdesignand

    constructionprojectmanagementgroup.”

    Dukepointedoutthattheinternalstaffmustbeempowered,andmustbe

    compensatedatmarketrates.Iftheeconomyisstrong,experiencedandqualifiedinhouse

    staffmaybeluredawaybyoffersfromindustry.Keepingexperiencedstaffanddeveloping

    experienceinnewemployeesinthefaceofloomingretirementsisanissueofsome

    importance.Itisgoodtorememberthatinexperiencedorineffectivestaffanywhereinthe

    team,whetherowner,designer,orconstructor,cancauseprofounddysfunctionintheteam

    andthreatentheviabilityoftheproject.

    Internalleadersmusteducatetheowner’snon-designandconstruction

    leadership.Internaleducationisrequiredforanorganizationtobecomehighperforming

    withitscapitalprojects.Dawsonsaid,“Youhavetodemonstrateveryeffectivelyto

    individualswhoarenotparticularlywellversedinunderstandingthecomplexitiesofa

    facilitiesprojectdeliveryprogram,andmayactuallyhavesomestrongmisconceptions.”

    Internalpoliticscannegativelyimpacttimely,effectivedecisionmaking.

    Dawsonwentontodeclarethat“itisessentialtoestablishanempowered

    hierarchicalprojectclientstructure,withdesignatedroles,authorities,and

    accountabilities,thatcanberelieduponfordecisions,commitments,andkeyinformation

    atalllevels.”Rabermadethepointthattheowner’sleadershipmustbeabletoactas

    passionate,committedchampions.

    Principle4: Astableofpre-qualifiedconsultantsandcontractors

    Knowndesignandconstructionconsultantswithrelevantqualificationsare

    preferred.Whilenewrelationshipsandcombinationsofexternalconsultantsare

    inevitable,andoftendesirable,theabilitytoworkagainwithindividualsandcompanies

  • 18

    thathaveperformedtogethersuccessfullyinthepastisvalued,especiallywhenthepast

    workwaswiththeclientmakingthecurrentselection.

    Dukesuggestedthatwhenselectingateam,“theownerneedstohaveaclear,

    transparent,andconsistentprocess.”Collectingqualificationsfromcandidatefirmsis

    helpfulinnarrowingaselectionlist,andthoughtfulexaminationofthequalificationsand

    referencesforthespecificindividualsproposediscrucial.Theprivate,non-governmental

    ownerhasgreaterleewaytodefinethecriteriaforselectionandprocurementinanyway

    theydesire.Governmentalprocurementmayhavemoreregulatoryboundaries,butcan

    includecreativeandinnovativeproposals.

    Althoughdifficult,selectingindividualsfortheteamthathaveastronghistoryof

    workingtogetherisfrequentlythedefiningcharacteristicofprojectsuccess.Althoughtwo

    firmsmayhavealonghistoryofworkingtogether,ultimatelyitisabouttheindividualson

    theteamfarmorethanitisaboutthespecificcompaniesparticipatingintheteam.

    BrianHolmesofTexasHealthResourcesexplainedthat“itisveryhelpfultohavea

    generalcontractorandanarchitectwhoarefamiliarwiththefacilityandbecome,forall

    intentsandpurposes,anextensionofourstaff.”Thesefirms,together,mayserveovertime

    onallprojectsforasinglecampus.Holmesdescribesawaytokeepaddingnewcompanies

    tothepool.“Wecontinuallytrytorefreshthegroup,”hesaid,“byregularlyintroducing

    newpeopleonprojectsthatmaybealittlelessrisky,sotheycangetmorefamiliarwiththe

    campus.We’reinfusingnewbloodbecauseifwedon’t,thenourcoststendtodriftupward.

    We’vegottocontinuallybringinhungrysubcontractorstokeepeverybodyhonest.”

    Holmesrecognizesthatthebigcontractoronthebigjobmaynotbeabletosecure

    competitivebidsforthesimultaneoussmallerproject,sotheybringinsmallercontractors

    forsmallerjobs.“Wegettoknowpeople,anditkeepseverybodyelsehonest.”These

    smallerprojectswouldbehandledbythesameinternalprojectmanagerresponsiblefor

    thecampus.“Everybodyneedstoknowtheycanbereplaced,”hedeclared.

    RichdescribedtheIHCinterviewprocesswhichincludedafulldayattheofficeof

    theshortlistteams.IHCconsistentlyusedastableofexperiencedfirmspre-qualifiedbythe

    system,fromwhichlocalunitscouldmakeaselection,oftendecidingonthebasisof

    perceivedculturecompatibility.Calhoun,whobelievesindetailedinterviews,describesa

    selectionprocessinwhichtheprospectiveconsultantteamisgivenaproblemtosolve

  • 19

    duringtheinterview,providinginsightintothewaytheteamworks,andacceleratingthe

    learningcurverelatedtoworkingtogether.

    Evaluationcriteriashouldextendbeyondlowestfirstcostandshortesttimeline.

    Theowner’sdecisionaboutcontractorselectionshouldofcourseincludecostand

    schedule,buttheparticipantswereclearthatlimitingevaluationtothesecriteriaisshort

    sighted.Alltoooftentheclaimisthatabidoffersthebestvalue,butinrealityitisonlyif

    thebidislow.Beckerrecommendsthat“thelevelofacceptablequalityinmaterialsand

    constructionshouldbeaknownfactor,alongwiththelowesttotallongtermcostof

    ownership,andthedesiredlevelofsustainability(LEEDCertification,Silver,Gold,or

    Platinumlevel).”Theownershouldbecertainthattheproposalsaddresstheproject

    objectiveswithmeasurablecommitments.Beckersuggeststheexpressionoftheowner’s

    brandisjustonefactortobeconsidered.

    “Ithinkalotofsuccessofthejob,”Calhouncontended,“startswiththeprocurement

    andtheevaluationfactorsused,andthebehaviorsthoseevaluationfactorscompel.”He

    pointedoutthatselectionsthatonlyconsiderlowestfirstcostcompelbehaviorsnotinthe

    owner’slongtermbestinterest.“Youwantaprocurementprocessthatcompelsthe

    behaviorofopenness,ofdecisionmakingonthebestperceivedvalue,notjustlowest

    price.”Hemadethepointthatbestvaluefortheowner,asameasureoflifecyclecost,is

    rarelycalculatedandusedtocomparecompetingproposalsintheworldoflowestfirst

    cost.

    Choosingefficientsystemscanlowertotalcostandtotalcostofownership.Calhoun

    saidtheconstructionprocurementcommunityisnotsetuptoaskthiskindofquestion.

    Kouletsisrecalledthewarningthat“ifyouwantitcheap,you’llgetitcheap.”

    Evaluationcriteriashouldincludesubjectivefactors.Whenmakingevaluations

    ofproposalsfromcandidatesforthedesignteam,ortheconstructionteam,notallfactors

    canbemeasuredobjectively.Thepersonalchemistrybetweenproposedteammembers

    andtheowner’sstaffcannotbemeasured,forexample,butitcanbesensed.Thereare

    intangiblefactorsthatmayhaveaprofoundinfluenceupontheteam’sperformance.

    Calhounbelieves“subjectivefactorsandpastperformancearesuperiorpredictors

    ofsuccessfulprojectoutcomes.”Hesaystheyaremoreimportantfactorsinteamselection

    thanfirstcost,orfee.

  • 20

    Increasingly,reportsKouletsis,KaiserPermanenteislookingatoperationalquality

    asbenchmarksforsuccess.Onsomeprojects,successcriteriamightbeoperationalin

    nature,suchas,fewerslips/trips/falls,orareducedrateofnosocomialinfectionsinthe

    newbuilding.Theseoutcomesmaybeinfluencedbytheselectionoftheteam,yetthelink

    fromteamselectiontooutcomesmaynotbeobviousduringtheinterviewprocess.

    Principle5: Standardsthatsimplifydecisionsanddonotstifleinnovation

    Standardssimplifysomedecisionsandreducevariation.Standardsshouldhelp

    setthelevelofqualityorperformancethatisconsideredtheminimumacceptabletothe

    projectteamortheowner.Standardsfortypes,sizes,configuration,equipment,andso

    forthcansimplifythedecisionprocess.Thefullscalemock-upprocessallowslarge

    numbersofusersandconsultantstorefinethespecificsforstandardizedspaces.According

    toDuke,standardsforthedesignandconstructionprocesscanactasa“clearplaybook”

    followedbytheinternalteam,andprovidedtotheexternalteamsothattheycanbe

    “oriented,integrated,andeasedintotheprocess.”

    Standardscanbeinavarietyofareas.Organizationsmayhavestandardsata

    system-widelevelforthingsliketheelectronichealthrecord,thefoodservicemodel,local

    andregionalclinicallaboratoryservices,orlaundryoperationsthatgoverndecisionsfor

    individualprojects.Theremaybestandardsforroomsizes,equipmentlayouts,allowable

    furnitureandfinishes,aswellasprotocolsforwhomayhaveanoffice,andwhomaynot.

    Manyoftheequipmentandfurnituredecisionsmaybeassociatedwiththesystem’s

    purchasingagreements.Standardsmaybeinplaceforthequalityofpreferredmechanical

    andfiresafetysystemsorotherimportantengineeringcomponents.AnOwnermayhave

    projectdeliverypreferencesthatstandardizeprojectcommunication,submissions,and

    approvals.

    Standardsmaybeprioritized;somearemoreimportantthanothers.Some

    standardsareessentialwhileothersshouldsimplyserveasguidelines.Following

    standardsbasedondifferingvalues,orinappropriateinthespecificcircumstance,requires

    judgmentonthepartofprojectleadership.RichreportsthattheIHCsystemexamined

    generalprinciplesofstandardsandbasiccomponentsthatlentthemselvesto

  • 21

    standardizationandalthoughapprovedbytheboard,theywerenotconsideredautomatic.

    Standardswereflexibleenoughtoallowforlocaladaptation.

    Dukesaid“youcan’tstandardizeeverynutandbolt”onaproject.Hesuggested

    Ownersevaluatewherethemostriskliesintheabsenceofastandard.Harpersaidthatthe

    “Owner’svisioneventuallygetsboileddownintoprojectdocuments.Wecanlosesomeof

    theowner’sfocuswhenweboiltheproblemdown”fordocumentation.Insomecases,

    standardscandefendagainstlossoffocus.

    Standardsmustnotbeallowedtobecomestaleoroutdated.Standards

    documentsneedtobecontinuouslyreviewed,updated,andimproved.Theymustbe

    documentscapableofadaptationandrespondingtonewprojectrequirementsor

    conditions,asinthecaseofchangingtechnologyormedicalpractice.Itiscritically

    importantthatthestandardsarealwaysinstrictalignmentwiththeowner'svisionand

    objectives.Thosestandardsthatdonotalignmightbeeliminated.Dukerecommendeda

    personorsmallgroupdedicatedtoreviewingandrevisingtheorganization’sstandards.

    Externalconsultantsmightalsobeaskedtoperformareviewofthestandards.

    Principle6: Hierarchicalcommandstructurefortheteam

    Complexprojectsoftenrequirecomplicatedteamstructures.Eachmemberofthe

    teamshouldrecognizetheauthoritywhichdirectsthecourseofthework.Thehierarchy

    withineachfirmorcompanyengagedtoworkfortheownermustbeclearandunderstood.

    Theowner’sorganizationmusthaveaclearstructureforguidingtheprojectfromthe

    trusteestotheadministration,andontotheprojectdirectortowhomtheexternalteam

    reports.DawsontellsustheOwnerneeds“atopdowngovernancestructureinvolvingthe

    differentconstituenciesinaparticularproject.”Kouletsistellsusthat“creatingabrief

    documentthatstatestherolesandresponsibilitiesofeverymemberoftheteamiskey.

    EveryoneshouldunderstandtheRACIdiagram(ResponsibilityAssignmentMatrix)forthe

    project.Itshouldbealivingdocument—changingasnecessaryoverthecourseofthe

    projectandastheprojectteamencounterschallenges.”

    Multi-headedownerswithoverlappingresponsibilitiesmustclarifylinesof

    authorityfortheteam.Projectswithcomplexownershipstructures,suchasgovernment

  • 22

    orsystemprojectswheredifferentplayersonlyhaveportionsoftheOwner’srole,mustbe

    abletoproviderationalwaysfortheexternalteamtomakesenseofthewayinwhich

    instructionswillbereceivedanddecisionswillbemade.Dukesuggestedtheneedfora

    steeringcommittee.HolmesdescribedhowTexasHealthResourcesviewstheworkfora

    particularhospital.“Theauthoritytospendthemoney,theauthoritytodoanythingonthe

    project,toapprovechangeorders;theentireauthoritystructurefortheprojectdoesn’tgo

    throughthelocalhospital,”hesaid.“Representativesofthehospitalanddepartmentsare

    treatedascustomers,andwetakethatveryseriously.”Wooldridgedescribedhowa

    governmentprojectmayrequireacollectiveleadershipteamasaresultofthecomplicated

    contractualauthorityofthemultipleentitiesinvolved,but“everyseniorexecutivewantsto

    knowwhothego-topersonis,andtheywantoneperson.”

    Organizationseachneedanidentifiedsinglepointofresponsibility.Calhoun

    suggestedthatthemostimportantsuccessfactorisforeachorganizationwithintheteam

    tohavearesponsiblepersoninaleadershipposition.“Eachteammember,”hedeclared,

    “musthaveoneindividualwiththeauthority,theexperiencenecessarytomakeinformed

    andtimelydecisions,andtheattitudethatrecognizestheneedtomaketimelydecisions.”

    Whenthepersondoesn’thaveauthoritytomakeadecision,anditinvolvesabureaucracy

    thatrequirestoomanyapprovalsandjustifications,Calhounsaid“thecostsgoupandthe

    relationshipdisintegrates.”Richdeclaredthat“itisownerdecisionmaking,morethanany

    otherfactorthatdelaysthecourseofaproject.”

    Contractorsareaccustomedtoahierarchicalstructure.Subcontractorspreferto

    receiveordersfromasingleperson;recognizingachainofcommandwithasinglepointof

    responsibility.Conflictinginstructionsfrommultiplesourcescreateconfusionandcanlead

    toproblemsanddelays.SamGioldasis,VicePresidentofWalkerEngineering,speakingfor

    subcontractors,said“thehierarchyisinplaceforareason.Wecan’thavemultiple

    masters.”Calhounconcurred,saying,“Wehavetobecarefulthatwedon’thavemultiple

    headsgivingmultipleorders”tothesamesubcontractors.Thesubneedstobelievethe

    persongivingtheordersisempowered,andwillnotbecountermanded.

    IftheOwnerskipslevelsofauthoritytomakedirectrequestsofthesub,problems

    canarise.Ignoringthehierarchyoftheprojectstructurecanleadtoconflictandconfusion.

  • 23

    Principle7: Timely,effectivecommunicationiscrucial

    Teamcommunicationisfundamentaltoprojectsuccess.Complexprojects

    demandconstanteffectivecommunicationamongthevariouselementsoftheinternaland

    externalteam.Rapidresponsetomessagesisexpected,andrapidturnaroundforrepliesto

    requestsforinformationordecisionsisrequired.Messagesmustbesimultaneouslycopied

    toallconcernedsothattimeconsumingstringsofsequentialmessagescanbeavoided.

    Everyoneshouldbeawareofprojectstatusandemergingissuesatthesametime.

    ThisisespeciallytruewhentheOwnerisa‘multi-headed’entitywherecommunicationand

    decisionmakingprotocols,andacceptabletimeframesfordecisionmakingmustbecrystal

    clear.Quasneyremindedthat“wheneverthere’sahandoff,there’salwaystheriskofsome

    vitalinformationorintentiongettinglost.”

    Raberpointedoutthat“goodcommunicationcreatesgoodworkingrelationships

    betweenpeople,”andwentontosaythat“thebettertherelationships,theeasieritisto

    resolveproblems.”Wooldridgesuggestedthatthereshouldbedailyorweeklyhuddles

    involvingallthecontractentities,andbi-weeklysupervisorylevelmeetings,“Atamonthly

    orquarterlylevel,”hesaid,“webringintheexecutiveteams.”Whenitisworkingwell,the

    participantscansittogetherandhave“open,candidissuediscussionswithouthavinga

    control.”

    Itdoesn’tworkwhereoneormoreoftheentitiesputsafilteronshared

    information.Wooldridgecommentedthatsometimesthiscommunicationtransparencycan

    beenhancedbyoutsidefacilitation.

    Someaspectsofcommunicationshouldbecontrolledatspecificlevels.Open

    communicationdoesn’trequireanoverload.Fullandtimelycommunicationcanbe

    subvertedbypassingonunnecessarychatter.

    Holmesindicatedthatinformationmustbecontrolled,sosomeupperlevelplayers

    getinformationthathasbeen“boiledandcondensed”toexplainthestatusofschedule,

    budget,andkeyissues,including“thekeydecisionsweneedfromyou.”Hesaid,“Thisis

    likemakingsausage,andyouhavetokeepthesausagemakinghidden.Youcan’thave

    peoplewhodon’thaveastrongstomachobservingthis.”

  • 24

    Principle8: Constantattentiontocostandschedulecontrol

    Budgetandscheduleareuniversalfactorsbywhichprojectsaremeasured.It

    comesasnosurprisethattheexpertsinterviewedwereunanimousinrecognizingthat

    everyprojectrequirescontinuousmonitoringofbothbudgetandschedule.Dawsontellsus

    that“therearethreebasiccomponentsofeveryproject,consistingofscope,budget,and

    schedule.Oneofthosemustbedesignatedasthemostimportant,andthusbecomesthe

    primarydriverforallprojectdecisions.Theothertwowillfollowinadeclaredorderand

    aresecondary.”Dukedeclaredthattheprocessofbudgetandschedulemanagementshould

    be“visibletothehigher-ups,”andtransparentaboutthemetricsused.Managementbest

    practicesuggeststhatthemultipleprojectmanagersonvariouspartsofthedeliveryteam

    should,basedontheirrelevantexperience,beabletoanticipatewhatisyettooccur,and

    plantoavoidpotentialproblems.

    MedStar’sSteveWooldridgeconsideredthetoolofanintegratedmasterscheduleas

    awayofforcingaprocessinwhich“eachofthoseactorsateachofthoselevelsmustcome

    togetherandworkthroughthenuancesofassemblingamasterschedule.”Dukepointed

    outthattherearenowcollaborativeprojectmanagementsoftwaresystemsthatmayhelp

    thecoordination.

    Developingreliablebudgetsbeginsearlyintheprocess.Dukesaid“itallstarts

    withanorganizedcapitalsubmissionprocess”thatincludeshowprojectrequestsare

    submittedandatransparentprocessbywhichtheyareevaluatedforapproval.Theremust

    beclarityaboutthecriteriabywhichaprojectisselectedforfunding.Beckerdescribed

    changingfromaplanningmodelforthemilitaryinwhichservicecomponentsprepared

    extensivedocumentationforprojectsthatstoodlittlechanceoffullfundinggiventhe

    volumeofprojectsandalimitedbudget.Thewastedtimeandefforthasbeenreducedby

    revisingthesubmissionprocesstobestreamlinedandsimplified,allowingprojectstobe

    givenanenterprisereviewbeforedetailedplanningtoensurealignmentwithMilitary

    HealthSystemstrategicinitiativesandidentifyfacilityperformanceparametersbefore

    investmentoftheextensiveplanningeffortrequiredtoseekformalapproval.“We’retrying

    tobemoreagile,”hesaid,“andspendlessmoneyupfrontuntilwereallyknowit’san

    importantrequirementthatseniorleadershipwantstofund.”

  • 25

    KaiserPermanentetypicallyhasaplaceholderbudgetuntilthecompletionof

    SchematicDesign,atwhichtimethebusinesscase,includingtheultimateprojectbudget

    andscheduleisfinalizedandapproved.KouletsisreportedthattheconceptofTargetValue

    Design(Zimina,Ballard&Pasquire,2012)is“onewaytoreducethelikelihoodofthe

    traditionalanddevastatingdesign-estimate-redesign-estimate-redesign-estimate‘cycleof

    death’.”Thereisalsothenotionthatthedesignteamcanbegivenspecificcosttargetsfor

    allmajorConstructionSpecificationsInstitute(CSI)lineitemsasawayofdesigningtothe

    budget.

    Accurateestimatingismandatory.Itisnotpossible,Richobserved,tohave

    confidenceinthescopeandbudgetwithouthighlyreliableestimatingfromtheearliest

    stageofaproject.Suchestimatingcanbepartoftheexternalprojectteam,usuallyfromthe

    chosencontractor,orfromaprofessionalestimatingconsultanttotheteamandtheowner.

    Controllingbudgetandscheduleisaneverydayactivity.Discoveringwherea

    projectscopestandsagainsttheintendedbudgetandscheduleisnotanactivityrestricted

    totheproject’smajormilestones.Eachmemberoftheprojectteamhasaresponsibilityto

    considercostandscheduleimplicationsofalldecisionsalongtheway,fromproject

    initiationthroughcompletion.Ifattentiontocostcontrolispartofeachdecisionalongthe

    way,therewillbefewersurprises.Calhounpointedoutthat“timeisakiller,”andthatlack

    oftimelydecisionscanfester,causingincreasedcostandothermajorissues.

    Acontractormustcontinuouslymanagetheschedule.Theinitialscheduleissubject

    tonumerousunexpectedforcesthatrequireadjustments.Gioldasispointedouthowthe

    intendedscheduleissubjectto“uncountedthingsthatchange,”sothatweeklymeetingsof

    thesuperintendentandallofthesubcontractorsmust“constantlymodifyandkeepthat

    scheduleasalivingdocument.”

    Understandingoftheroleofusersandcontrolovertheirrequestsisvital.While

    theinputfromusersofthespaceissought,desirable,andimportant,itmustbetimely.

    Calhounobservedthatwhentheprojectisnearingcompletion,itmaybe3-5yearsafterthe

    medicalequipmentwasselectedandspecified.Userrequestsforlatermodelsandnewer

    equipmentcannegativelyimpactthecompletionschedule.Theremustbeaconsistent

    policyannouncedearlyintheprocessonhowthisissuewillbeaddressedandtheusers

    needtohavesharedaccountabilityforbudgetandschedule.Inoneexample,theowner

  • 26

    declaredasixmonthmoratoriumonchanges,requiredthestafftooccupyand‘shake

    down’thespace,andsaresultcollectedfewerchangerequestsattheendoftheperiod.

    “Whereyoucancreatesomeaccountabilityintheusergroup,”Calhounargued,“youhave

    everybodycollaboratingtosolveissues.”

    Controllingbudgetandschedulerequiresearlyandconsistentinvolvementof

    theconstructionelementsoftheteam.Earlycontractorinvolvementshouldmeanthat

    thedesignerscanincorporatepricingandconstructabilityinformationfromthestartand

    stayclosertothetargetbudget.Holmesidentifiesproblemsinateamifheseesdesign

    workfollowedbypricingthatforcesredesigntoreducecost,andfurthercyclesofdesign-

    pricing-cutting.“That’sasignalformetoeithergetinvolvedorstartquestioningthe

    projectmanagementbecausethatteam’snotworking.”

    Formany,valueengineering(VE)hastakenonnegativeconnotations.While

    costcontrolismandatory,thewayitisaccomplishedmakesadifference.Insomemodels,

    theprogrammanagerisgivenastrongfinancialincentivetoreduceprojectcost,withno

    requirementtoretainvaluefortheclient,andinvariablyunproductive,adversarialconflict

    ariseswithmembersofthedesignteam.Insomecasesprojectqualitysuffersunreasonably

    andsomeoftheowner’sobjectivesremainunmet.

    Asharedsavingsmodeloftendoesnotgivetheownerfullvalueofthesavingsand

    incentivizesthecontractortomakeanyandallcuts,regardlessofultimatevaluetothe

    owner.Changingtheincentivesfromprovidingmaximumvalueforeverydollarinthe

    budgettofindinganywaytoreducecostsignificantlyaltersthewaythedesignand

    constructionteamperforms.Holmesdescribedacomplexprojectwithabroad-based

    sharedsavingsstructureandsays,“I’mnotsureI’deverdothatagain.”

    Ahotteam-coldteammodelofferssecondopinionsfromtrustedpartners.

    IntermountainHealthCarehaslongusedastableofpre-qualifiedfirmsforbothdesignand

    construction.Becausetherearemultipleapprovedfirmsineachcategory,IHCcanselect

    oneasthe‘hotteam’engagedtoproducetheproject,pairingthemwitha‘coldteam’only

    responsibletoreviewthedesigndevelopmentplansandofferalternatives(Rich,2010).

    Atareviewworkshop,hotandcoldrepresentativesfromthearchitects,mechanical

    engineers,electricalengineers,structuralengineers,civilengineers,andcontractorsarein

    thesameroomwiththeowner’steamforlengthymeetingstocarefullyexamineliterally

  • 27

    hundredsofalternativesandtheirfinancialandoperationalimpacts.Alternatesare

    examined,andhighpriorityoptionsarefullydevelopedbythediscipline-basedgroups

    suitabletobefullyestimated.Ultimately,some50-100alternativeswouldbeincorporated

    intotheproject.Becausebothfirmsareontheacceptedlist,andwillbepairedinother

    waysnexttime,thereisnoincentivetotreatthereviewasanadversarialprocess.

    IntermountainHealthCarehasfoundthemethodtobe“aneffective,orderlymethodto

    optimizevalueandreducecost”(Rich,2010,p.135),whichhasproducedsavingsof8%on

    acapitalexpenditureof$1.3billion.JohnRichnotedthatthisseemstobeuniquetoIHC,

    butbelievesitcouldworkasaneffectiveevaluationprocessforanysystemorproject.

    Principle9: Everyoneinthesameroom

    Asprojectplanningisoccurring,anddecisionsaremade,everyonemustbe

    presenttoparticipate.Leadershipanddecision-makersfortheowner,designconsultants,

    theconstructionteam,andimportantadvisorsmustallbeinthesameroom.Theymust

    hearwhatishappeningatthesametime,andbeabletofullycontributetotheexchange.All

    voicesontheteammustbeheardasimportantdecisionsareconsidered.Wooldridgesaid

    “that’showyoucansortoutwhoneedstodowhat.”Iftheprocessleavesoutkeyplayers,

    anddirectionissentoutfromapartialgroup,therealwaysexiststhepossibilitythatthe

    bestdecisionmaynothavebeenmade,andinsomecases,thesubsequentadjustment

    requiredmaymeanconfusionanddelay.

    Dukereportedthat“ourbestprojectshavethecoreteam,constructionmanager,

    engineer,andarchitectallonboardatthesametime,workingtogethertodevelopthe

    design,”withaparallelcostingprocess.Gioldasisfavorablydescribedearlyinvolvementof

    contractorsandsubcontractorsinwhichkeysubtrades“areoftenselectedbeforethefirst

    lineisdrawn.”

    Harpertalkedabouthaving“thearchitectonthebuilder’sside”asameanstohelp

    thecontractorunderstandthedesignconstraints,butcautionedagainstasituationin

    whichthearchitect/engineeristreated“likeanothersubtobepushedaround.There’sgot

    tobeapartnership,”hedeclared,“regardlessofthecontractualrelationshiporthe

    acquisitionstrategy.”

  • 28

    Dukebelievesmanagingtherisksonamajorprojectcannotbedoneinday-to-day

    managementmeetings.“Therehastobeaseparateanddedicatedprocess,”hesaid,“anda

    meetingcadenceestablishedtomanagethesegamechangers.”Thebigroomconcept,

    accordingtoKouletsis,ismorethanjustgettingallthekeyplayerstogetherformajor

    decisionmaking.Co-locatingtheowner'steam,thedesignteam,thegeneralcontractorand

    thesubsisenormouslyhelpful.Itisoftenthedaytodayconversationsandthemillionsof

    tinydecisionsthathelpwithteamcohesionandgooddecisionmaking.

    TheLEANprocessencouragesthebigroomdecisionmodel(Jørgensen&Emmitt,

    2009),butgettingeveryonetobetogetherformajordecisionsandguidingprinciplesis

    usefulforanyprojectdeliverymodel.Gioldasissuggestedthatmostlargeprojectsare

    beingdoneinsomeformalorinformalvariationofaLEANprocess.Rabernotedthatmost

    bigprojectshavejointprojectofficesfortheteammembers.Beckerreportedthat“solving

    theproblemisnotsequential.We’llcallallofthestakeholderstogetherandhaveproject

    folksonthephone.”Calhounsaidthatregardlessofprojectdeliverytype,hewouldprefer

    togatherallplayersfortheplanning,andthatitresultsin“ahugeimprovementtothe

    outcomes.”

    Onerecordedconcernwasthefrequencywithwhichinformationtechnologyisnot

    integratedintothedesignandconstructionprocess.CBRE’sPatrickDukeobservedthat

    perhapsitisbecausetheconstructionprocessusuallyreportstoaCOO,andtheITsystems

    reporttotheCFOorCIO,andthereisnotanautomaticassumptionthattheyshouldhave

    earlyinvolvementintheprocess.

    Principle10: Everyoneneedstohaveskininthegame

    Projectsuccessmustbepersonallyrelevanttotheparticipants.Majormulti-

    milliondollarprojectscannotbetreatedas‘justajob.’Quasneysuggestedthat“team

    membersneedtoshareownershipofeachfacetoftheeffort.”Thereneedtobeexplicit

    tangibleandintangiblerewardsandconsequencesforperformance.Recognized

    performanceonasuccessful,huge,complex,costlyprojectshouldhaveimportantcareer

    advancementpotentialforinternalandexternalparticipants.Atthesametime,withstakes

    sohigh,unsatisfactoryperformanceshouldbequicklyresolved.

  • 29

    Projectdeliveryisateamsport.Nosingleindividual’sperformanceissufficientto

    ensuresuccess.Kouletsisbelieves“Thereshouldbethesensethatthewholeteamsucceeds

    orfails,ratherthanasinglepartoftheteamsucceedingorfailing.Allteammembersneed

    tobeinvestedinthecombinedsuccessofallotherteammembers.”Alignmentofincentives

    isimportantforaligningcollaborativeperformance.

    Risksshouldbeallocatedtothepartybestabletomanageorcontrolthem.

    Calhounsuggestedincentivesandcontingenciesshouldbeconsideredforidentifiedrisks.

    Hedeclaredthat,“Allmajorstakeholdersmustsharesomerisk.”Gioldasisemphasizedthe

    needto“createasafeworkenvironment”foreveryoneonthejob.

    TheOwner’sroleiscrucial.Kouletsissays“themoretheownerisawareand

    acceptstheirownaccountabilityandresponsibilityintheproject,themorelikelythe

    projectwillgowell.”Holmesseeksarchitects,engineers,andcontractors“whoaresmarter

    thanme,”butsuggestsownerbehaviorscanharmtheproject.“Ifyouwanttoreallyscrew

    upaproject,itrequirestheownertoscrewup.It’stheownernotmakingdecisionsontime,

    micromanagingandquestioning,andcreatinganenvironmentoffearorretributionwith

    thearchitectsandcontractors,sothosepeoplecan’tdotheirjobs.IfIgotothetable

    thinkingthesepeoplearetryingtocheatme,orthesepeoplehavetobecontrolledlike

    children,thenI’mbasicallyjustlimitingthem,andI’mnotgoingtogetthebestfromthem.”

    Principle11:Personalrelationships

    Peopleworkingwithotherpeopledelivercomplexcapitalprojects.Team

    membersneedtobeskilledatinteractingwithothers.Peoplewithahistoryofworking

    togetherandasharedhistoryofprevioussuccesswillfinditeasytocontinuetobuildona

    solidrelationship.Newteammembersshouldbeabletofitintoaproductivesetoffresh

    relationships.Kouletsissuggestedthat“morethanafirm’shistoryofworkwitheachother,

    theindividual’sconnectionstoothersontheteamiscritical.”Discordandcircumstancesin

    whichpeoplearenoteffectiveinworkingtogethermustbeavoidedandaddressedifit

    arises.

    Quasneydescribedamethodinwhichshealwaysmeetswithparticipants

    individually“tooptimizeawarenessandunderstanding”beforecallinggroupmeetings.She

  • 30

    usesintegrationmanagementasawayofbringingtogetherandconnectingteammembers,

    andblendingthemintotheproject.Shesaid“itisnotreallyfairtohaveanarchitectcome

    inandstartfromscratch,”soshedevelopsaframework“sotheycantargettheirfocusand

    talentappropriately,andnotwastetime.It’saboutgettingtherightpeopletalkingand

    sharingideas.”

    Participantsmustbelieveinthebenefitsofcollaboration.Calhounsuggestedthat

    youcan’tgetthemostfromcollaborationiftheorganizations,orthepeoplerepresenting

    them,aren’tcollaborativebynature.Harpersaideveryonehas“gottobecollaborativeand

    beabletoworktogether.”Heproposedthatadesirableteamtraitisforpeoplewhocan

    thinkmorecollaboratively.Gioldasisreportedthat“aprojectofanysignificancestartsoff

    withsomesortofteambuildingevent.”Sincetherearealwaysnewfacesonanyproject,

    effortstoencouragedevelopmentofpersonalrelationshipscanbeproductive.Wooldridge

    remindedthattheremustbecelebrationsoftheteam’swinsalongtheway.

    Principle12:Trustiskey

    Peoplewhoworktogetherneedtrustwitheachother.Anon-adversarialclimate

    isrequiredforcollaboration.Whenonemustrelyontheworkofanother,orthewordof

    another,trustisrequired.Harperdeclaredthat“everybodyhastohavetrust.That’sthe

    non-negotiablerule…ruleone.Ifyoudon’thavethat,you’renotgoingtogetveryfar.”

    Dawsonsaid,“Webelievethereisanaddedvaluewhenworkingwithtrustedpartners.”He

    declaredthatcontractorsarepre-qualified“onthebasisofdemonstratedtrustworthiness.”

    Maister,GreenandGalford(2000)definetrustworthinessascredibilityplusreliabilityand

    thedegreeofintimacyintherelationship,dividedbytheperceptionoftheperson’sself-

    interest.TrustgoesoutthewindowwhenIthinkyouareinitforyourself,andnotgenuine

    indoingsomethingtoservemybestinterest.

    Organizationsmusttrusttheirrepresentatives.Permissionforauthorityand

    responsibilitytoexplorenewpathsmustcomefromhigherlevelsoftheorganization.

    “Withthecredibilitycomestheopportunitytoestablishofficiallysanctionedproject

    managementprocessesandstructures,”reportedTexasChildren’sPeteDawson,in

  • 31

    describinghisimplementationofamoresophisticateddeliverymodel.Astrustincreases,

    thereismoreleewayandcontrolovertheprocess,whichcancontributetogreatersuccess.

    Organizationsmusttrustthepartnerorganizationsintheprocess.Holmes

    commentedthateveryonesignstheinadequatestandardcontractformsbecause

    negotiatingnewlanguagewouldbecomplexandprohibitivewithlawyersrepresenting

    eachpartyandchallengingeveryword.Instead,hecontends,thesignedcontractgoesin

    thedrawerandisnotseenagain.“Weactuallyputtogetheramuchsimplerteaming

    documentonhowtheteamisgoingtoworktogetherintheprocess,andeverybodysigns

    ontothat,andthat’sthewaytheteambehaves,”hesaid.“Ifweeverwenttocourt,Idon’t

    knowwhatwouldhappen,butthat’sthewayweactuallywork.”Trustisclearlyattheheart

    ofthismodel,asitisinworkforthemilitary.Beckertalkedaboutthe“triangleoftrust”

    betweentheDefenseHealthAgency,theCorpsofEngineers(orNAVFAC),andtheusersof

    thefacility(ServiceMedicalDepartments).

    Anescapevalvewhenallelsefailsisatrustrelationshipatthetop.Leadershipof

    thevariousprojectteam’scomponentsshouldhavebuiltastrongrelationshipoftrustwith

    thepartyorpartiesattheverytopoftheclientorganization.Inacrisis,thistrustmay

    rescuearelationshipinjeopardy.

    Observations

    InadditiontotheareasofbroadconsensustreatedaboveasPrinciples,afew

    additionalObservationscanbemade.Thereissomevariationamongtheparticipantsin

    termsofuserinvolvement,conflictresolution,potentialevaluationmetrics,andvariations

    inthemodelsofprojectdelivery.

    Observation:Conflictresolution

    Conflictsmustberesolvedquickly,withfairness.Theparticipantsvoicedsupport

    forcompletecommunicationtransparency,yetsomefeltconflictsneednotbeairedacross

    theentireteam.Calhoundeclaredthat“littleproblemsjustgetbigger,andtheyagelike

  • 32

    milk,notwine.”Theinterviewparticipantsspentlittletimeaddressingconflictresolution,

    perhapsbecausesuccessfulprojectsencounterfewerconflicts.Itisexpectedthatwherever

    possible,thepartieswillrapidlyresolvetheirpotentialconflictsattheirownlevel,without

    turningtoarbitrationorinstructionfromabove.Conflictsbetweenusergroupsatone

    institutionareresolvedbytheproject’ssteeringcommittee.

    Conflictsdonotneedtobewidelybroadcast.Holmessaidthat“wedon’thandle

    theminfrontofthecustomer.”Mostissuesarehandledbytheowner’sprojectmanager,

    andthegeneralcontractorisheldresponsibleforresolvingdisputeswithsubcontractors.

    “Ishouldn’thearit90%ofthetime,”hesaid,“andthehospitalpresidentand

    administrationshouldneverhearit.”Gioldasisconfirmedthatmostconflictsareresolved

    bythegeneralcontractorwithoutreachingtheowner’srepresentative.

    Observation:Userinvolvementindecision-making

    Thereisatraditionofinternalandexternalteamsinvolvingtheusersofspace

    inthedesignprocess.Theparticipatoryplanningmodelinvolvestheintendedusersofthe

    buildingtohelpthedesignteammakedecisionsaboutfunctionandprocess.A

    participatoryprocesstoincludethepeoplewhowillultimatelyoccupythespacebeing

    designedhasbeenwidelyutilizedsincethe1960s,butlargehealthcaresystems,likethe

    MemorialHermannHealthSystemheadquarteredinHoustonhavesoughttoachieve

    greaterconsistencyfromonesitetoanother.Therehasbeenashiftinthelevelof

    participationofferedtotheendusers.Theparticipantsofferedvariationsintheir

    descriptionsofmethodsforinvolvingthelocalorsystemusersintheprojectdecisions.

    Itappearsthattheparticipants’organizationshavetakenstepstoreducethe

    variationininputfromusers.TexasChildren’sappoints‘ambassadors’torepresentthe

    peerstakeholdersandusergroups.Theybringtopicstothedesigntable,assuretheyare

    fullydiscussed,andreturntotheuserstocommunicatedecisionsandtheirreasonsina

    transparentprocess.Othershavecommitteesof‘superusers’atasystemleveltorepresent

    otherusersatthelocallevel.TexasHealthResourcesretainstheauthoritystructureatthe

    systemlevelandtreatstherepresentativesofthelocalhospitalascustomers.

  • 33

    Kouletsisremindedusitisalsocriticaltorememberthat,ingeneral,20-30percent

    ofthecontentexpertsfromtheOwner'ssidewillneveractuallymoveintothecompleted

    project.PromotionsandjobchangeswithintheOwner'sextendedteammeansthat

    introducingnewmemberstothevisionandthetaskofchangemanagementisnever

    ending.

    Observation:Multipledeliverymodelscanbeeffective

    Successfulprojectshaveusedseveraldeliverymodels.Multipledeliverymodels

    havebeeneffectiveforlargeandsmallprojects,privateorpublic.Theinterview

    participantsmentionedexperiencewithtraditionaldesign-bid-buildprojects,alongwith

    negotiatedbid,CMatrisk(ConstructionManager),design-build,andtheincreasinglyseen

    P3(PublicPrivatePartnership)process.

    RabernotedthattheP3processrequiresawell-organizedclient,alongwithwell-

    organizedarchitecture/engineeringandconstructionteamstotakeadvantageofthespeed

    oftheprocess.KouletsismentionedtwoversionsofIntegratedProjectDelivery(IPD)

    includingacontractingstructurelinkingallofthepartners,andanIPD-likestructure

    wherethespiritisthesame,butdoneunderamoretraditional“hub”ofcontractual

    relationshipswiththeOwneratthecenter.TheHealthDefenseAgency’sJohnBeckernotes

    thattheDepartmentofDefenseusesDesign-Build,Design-Bid-Build,EarlyContractor

    Involvement(ECI),IntegratedDesign-Build-InitialOutfitting(DBIO),andIntegrated

    Design-Bid-Build(IDBB),amongothermodels.CalhounmentionedtheVA’sIntegrated

    DesignandConstruct(IDC)method.

    Gilbane’sDougHarperdescribedhowdesign-bid-buildhadbeenthe“triedandtrue

    method”forthegovernmentinwhichtheOwnerhadmajorinput“tocustomizewhatthey

    wanted.”Hecontrastedthatwithdesign-buildwhichprovided“alittlebitmoreprice

    certainty,”andsuggestedthatthegovernment’sintegrateddesign-bid-build{IDBB)was

    modeledonthecivilianCMat-riskmethod,butthattheFederalAcquisitionsRegulations

    (FAR)“didnothavethelanguagetoallowanat-risktypecontract.”Hisconclusionwasthat

    design-buildmightbethebesttoolforgovernmentsystems,aslongastheyunderstandthe

    levelofadvancedocumentationrequired.

  • 34

    Ownershavetrieddesigncompetitionsamongselectedfirmspaidnominalfees.The

    NIH’sJudyQuasneybelieves“Aniconicbuildingwhichisdeemedworthyofacreativeflair

    isworthacquiringthroughadesigncompetition.”Holmesdescribedprojectsinwhichthe

    Ownernegotiateddirectlywithsomeofthesubcontractors.WalkerEngineering’sSam

    Gioldasispointedoutthegeneraltendencytobidprojectswhenthereislittleworkand

    competitionishigh;andtheoppositetendencytoprefernegotiationwhenworkis

    plentiful.

    Themajorlessonhereisthatanyoftheseprojectdeliverymodelscanproducea

    successfulproject,butCalhouncautionsthat“nooneprojectdeliverytypeisrightforevery

    organization.”IPDandP3methods,forexample,maybemoresuitedtolargerprojects.

    Responsibilityandliabilityischanging.Holmesrespondedtoaquestionabout

    treatingthemechanical/electrical/plumbingsystemsasanidentifieddesign-buildelement

    withinaconventionalcontract.“Theideaofhavingdesign-buildMEPisactuallypretty

    appealingtomefromanOwner’sstandpoint,”hesaid.Hewonders,however,forwhom

    theywouldwork.ThearchitectistodaythekeeperoftheRevitmodelusedbytheentire

    team,butHolmesbelievesthecontractorwilleventuallyhavethatrole.Hepointsoutthat

    thecontractorhasthecontractualrighttorelyontheaccuracyofthedrawings,yet

    “nobodythinkstheyareaccurate.”Holmescontendedthatdocumentationandcontracting

    processeshavenotcaughtupwithreality.

    Somemethodsofferthepotentialforanemphasisonlifecyclecosting.TheP3

    process,asanexample,hasthepotentialtobeseenasthetotalcostofownershipsinceit

    includesanoperationalcomponentforaperiodaslongas30years.ClarkConstruction’s

    BillCalhounbelievesthereispotentialforgreatvaluewhentotallifecyclecostis

    considered,andishopefulthatgovernmentalOwnerswilleventuallychangethe

    legal/financialconstraintspreventingselectionbasedontotalcostofownership.

    Observation:Owners’deliverymodelsarenotstatic

    ContinuousimprovementandconstantchangeisnormalformostOwners.The

    participantsdescribedmultipletypesofchangeintheirevolvingprocesses,andmultiple

    reasonsforchange.TexasHealthResources’BrianHolmesdescribedtheinfluenceofnew

  • 35

    technologiesfordocumentingprojects,including3-Dmodelsthatallowfordiscoveryof

    systemconflictsbeforetheprojectreachesthefield.

    Deliveryisanimportantmeasure.Stantec’sBruceRabersaid,“Deliveryiskeyfor

    everybody.TheOwnerwantshisbuilding.Thecontractorwantstogetoutoftherequickly.

    Andthearchitecturalanddesignstaffwanttogettheirworkdoneandgetoutwithout

    losingmoney.”Ifitgoesright,everyoneishappy,hesaid.“Ifitgetsdonewrong,thereare

    lotsofunhappypeopleformanyyears.”

    Observation:Evaluationmetrics

    Youcan’tmanagewhatyoucan’tmeasure.Thedifferentorganizations

    representedbytheparticipantshavedifferentmetricsfortrackingandmanagingaspects

    oftheircapitalprojects,yettheyallmanagetoaddresskeyissuesofimportancetotheir

    ownprojectdeliverystructure.Beckertellsusthat“codifyingtherolesandresponsibilities,

    havingopentransparentcommunication,andhavingprojectperformancemetricsinplace

    thatgetreportedandreviewedonarecurringbasishaveenhancedourabilitytodeliver

    theprojectthatwethoughtwewerebuying.”Hedescribedputtingprocessesandmetrics

    inplacetoinstillaccountabilityateachlevelofthecomplexorganization.Developmentofa

    consensusmodelforprojectevaluationmetricsisaworthytaskforfuturemanagersand

    theirexperiencedconsultants.

    Conclusion

    ThiswhitepaperaddressesthefutureoftheOwner’sroleinprojectorganizationfor

    healthcaredesignandconstruction.Thetwelveparticipants,whoareeachrecognized

    leadersintheindustry,werequiteconsistentintheirresponsestothevariousquestions.

    TheOwnerplaysacentralroleintheproject’ssuccess.JohnKouletsisreportedthatinthe

    Kaiserexperience,“ThemorethattheOwnerisawareandacceptstheirownaccountability

    andresponsibilityintheproject,themorelikelytheprojectwillgowell.“

  • 36

    • AnOwner’svision,goals,andobjectivesmustbeclear,welldocumented,and

    fullysharedateveryleveloftheprojectteam.

    • Asetofexpectationsforqualityandstandardsorguidelinesthathavenot

    becomeoutdatedorstalehelpguidetheplanning,design,andconstruction

    process.

    • TheOwnermusthaveanexperiencedsetofinternalleaders,orhirethem

    externally.

    • TheOwnermaywishtoworkconsistentlywithagroupofpre-qualifiedfirms

    andcompaniesthathaveahistoryofstrongperformance,whoeachoffer

    specificexperiencedindividualswithprovenperformanceasprojectleaders.

    • Theassembledteammusthavedirectincentivesforeveryone’sperformance,

    andallmustrecognizethattheorganizationssucceedorfailasagroup;notas

    isolatedplayersinacompetitivesetting.

    • Asuccessfulprojectwill,ofcourse,haveaccurateandreliableestimating,

    usuallyfromaqualifiedexternalconsultantorteammember.

    • Constantmonitoringofcostandschedulewithtimelyandtransparentfeedback

    totheteamisrequired.

    • Theparticipantsstatedtheirpreferenceforahierarchicalstructureof

    responsibilitiesinwhicheveryonetakesdirectionfromasingle,unambiguous

    source.

    • Theprojectorganizationalmodelrequireseffectiveandtimelycommunication.

    • Rapidcommunicationisahallmarkofourtime,andisrequiredtokeepaproject

    movinginitsplannedtrajectory.

    • Avaluablemethodforacceleratingqualitydecisionmakingistoensurethatall

    theappropriateplayersareintheroomatthesametime,soallperspectivescan

    beconsideredasdecisionsaremade.

    • Eachcomponentofthelargerprojectteamiscomposedofindividualswhomust

    continuouslyinteractwithoneanother.Theirpersonalskillsassociatedwith

    humaninteraction,facilitation,andconflictavoidancewillbeimportant.

  • 37

    • Teammembersshouldhaveintegrity,beempathetic,understanding,and

    genuinelycareforothersassociatedwiththeproject.

    • Intheend,trustandrespectamongstindividualswhomustworktogetheris

    crucialtoprojectsuccess.

    Theparticipantsdevelopedaconsensusthattheseelementsmaybetheminimum

    requiredforprojectsuccess,butdidnotruleoutotherpossibleconsiderations.Further,

    theyfounditimportanttostatethattheseprincipleswerenotrestrictedtolarge,complex

    capitalprojectsforhealthcarefacilities.Theycanbeshowntoplayavitalroleonsmaller,

    lesscomplexprojects,aswellasprojectsfromotherindustries.

    Projectsuccessisneitherrandomnoraccidental.

    Successrequireshardworkonthepartofmany.Successrequiresthefullfocusand

    consistentattentionoftheexperiencedplayersovertheentirecourseoftheproject’s

    duration.WorkingtogethertoachievetheOwner’svision,thoughdifficult,canbe

    enormouslysatisfyingwhensuccessisrealized.

  • 38

    References

    Charmaz,K.(2006).ConstructingGroundedTheory.ThousandOaks,CA:SAGE.

    Jørgensen,B.&Emmitt,S.(2009)."Investigatingtheintegrationofdesignandconstruction

    froma‘lean’perspective",ConstructionInnovation,9(2),225-240.

    Lincoln,Y.S.&Guba,E.G.(1985).Naturalisticinquiry.NewburyPark,CA:SAGE.

    Maister,D.H.,Green,C.H.&Galford,R.M.(2000).TheTrustedAdvisor.NewYork,NY:Free

    Press.

    Preiser,W.(2002).Continuousqualityimprovementthroughpost-occupancyevaluation

    feedback.JournalofCorporateRealEstate,5(10),42-56.

    Rich,J.H.(2010).Lettertotheeditors.HealthEnvironmentsResearch&Design,3(2):132-

    136.

    Shepley,M.M.(2011).HealthFacilityEvaluationforDesignPractitioners.Myersville,MD:

    Ascelpion.

    Silvis,J.K.(2015).FMI:Healthcareconstructiontogrowin2015.HealthcareDesign,15(1)

    Jan/Feb.,retrievedat:http://www.healthcaredesignmagazine.com/news-item/fmi-

    healthcare-construction-grow-2015on26October2015.

    Spradley,J.P.(1979).TheEthnographicInterview.Belmont,CA:WadsworthCengage.

    Zimina,D.,Ballard,G.&Pasquire,C.(2012).Targetvaluedesign:Usingcollaborationanda

    leanapproachtoreduceconstructioncost.ConstructionManagement&Economics,

    30(5),383-398,