Overview of Engineering Ethics in the United States
description
Transcript of Overview of Engineering Ethics in the United States
Dr. Elizabeth HoppeLewis University
June 2009
Overview of EthicsDeontology (ethics based on duty or
obligation) Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Focus on the intentions behind our actions Ethics as universal Happiness is irrelevant
Utilitarianism (ethics based on happiness) John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) Focus on the consequences Similar to Cost/Benefit Analysis in Economics
Limitations of Ethical TheoriesDeontology
No focus on consequences, only intentionsNo focus on human emotionThe theory only works if all people agreeWhy some may be excluded
UtilitarianismNo focus on intentionsDevaluing human lifeThe majority rules so the minority loses
Ethics in the United StatesApplied Ethics (application of ethical
theories) Why applied ethics is important Requirement in many fields (business, medicine,
engineering) Teaching students the importance of ethics in the
workplace The importance of case studies
Overview of Engineering EthicsProfessional Standards
Why it developed (Challenger, Exxon) Implications of one’s actions at work
Code of Conduct (taken from ASCE – American Society of Civil Engineers)
Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public and shall strive to comply with the principles of sustainable development in the performance of their professional duties.
Engineers shall act in such a manner as to uphold and enhance the honor, integrity, and dignity of the engineering profession and shall act with zero-tolerance for bribery, fraud, and corruption.
Problems in the WorkplacePublic Safety and Welfare put at risk Conflicts with managementPressure put on engineers to complete a taskWhistleblowing and its risks
When to blow the whistleWhy it can be unethical
Reasons why ethics in practice can be difficult
Case Study 1: The Ford Pinto CaseBackground to the Problem with the Ford Pinto
The Ford Pinto was first built in 1971 Gas tank housing was not changed until 1977
Likelihood of Gas Tank ExplosionsAbility to Fix the Problem
It could have been fixed with a $6.65 (US dollar) partWhy the Problem was not fixed
Ford decided against the recall in order to increase profits
Why this case is so famous in Business and Engineering Ethics
Ford Motor Co. Criminal CaseThree girls were killed in an accident in Indiana in
1978State of Indiana tried Ford Motor Company for
three counts of reckless homicideFirst time in recent history that a corporation was
on trial for this type of offenseFord spent $1,000,000 US Dollars for their defenseProsecution needed to show that Ford was recklessFord found not guilty
Problem of UtilitarianismFord’s Cost/Benefit Analysis ApproachPutting a Price on Human LifeProblem of consequences
Case Study 2: The Challenger DisasterEngineers noticed a prior problem with O-Rings
Flight 51-C on January 24, 1985 – unusually cold day
Primary O-ring seals on two joints had been compromised
Hot gas blow-by eroded part of the ring No backup for failed O-Rings
Task force was developed in August of 1985No decision was made prior to the Challenger
accident
Cause of the DisasterO-Ring seal failure in Solid Rocket Booster
(SRB) allowed hot gas blow-byMade contact with the external tank and
caused structural failureAerodynamic forces broke up the orbiter
The Night Before Launch Engineers at Morton-Thiokol tried to stop
the launch (Roger Boisjoly)Management was unhappy with the no
launch recommendationHow management made the decision
Only management votedOne of the managers was told to “take off his
engineering hat and put on his management hat”
Problem of “Group Think”
The Ethical IssuesThe Rogers Commission (Chairman William Rogers)
Appointed by the PresidentNASA’s decision-making process was a key
contributing factorNASA managers knew about the problem with O-
Rings since 1977 but failed to address it properlyProblem with Rogers Commission Findings
People were not blamed The work atmosphere Lack of Communication
The report takes away individual responsibility
Lessons for Engineers
Conflicts between managers and engineers do arise in business
Question of when to blow the whistleLoyaltyDoing the right thing
Ethical Theory vs. PracticeKnowing what is right vs. Pressure to do wrongHow to reconcile the two issues
ReferenceTom L. Beauchamp and Norman E. Bowie,
editors. Ethical Theory and Business, 4th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.