Overcoming The Odds Of Implementation In An Alternative ...

27
Overcoming The Odds Of Implementation In An Alternative Education Setting CASCWA 2017 Lina Bender & Amanda Thomas San Luis Obispo County Office of Education

Transcript of Overcoming The Odds Of Implementation In An Alternative ...

Overcoming The Odds Of Implementation In An Alternative Education Setting

CASCWA 2017

Lina Bender & Amanda Thomas

San Luis Obispo County Office of Education

Overview

• Getting started

• Our timeline

• Forward progress in times of change

• Agency Partners

• Lessons learned

MEET OUR PROGRAM

• SLOCOE Community School • 3 sites; geographically placed across the county

• Students ranging from 7-12th grades

• Staffing: • Each site with 2-3 general education teachers

• 1 special education teacher

• 1-3 paraprofessionals

• 1 Assistant Principal

• Shared 1 School Counselor and 1 School Psychologist

• 1 shared Principal

• 1 Mental Health Therapist (agency partner)

• 1 Drug and Alcohol Counselor (agency partner)

• 1 Probation Officer (agency partner)

OUR TIMELINE 2013-2014

Exploration & Adoption

• New Assistant Superintendent of Student Programs and

Services

• Assessment and identification of needs in SLOCOE Alternative Education programs

• Research in PBIS and Restorative Practices

OUR TIMELINE 2014-2015

Beginning Installation

August 2014:

Dr. Sprague workshop for SLOCOE and agency partners

OUR TIMELINE 2014-2015

Beginning Installation

• Fall 2014 – Beginning to establish some Universal components

• Defining School-Wide Behavioral Expectations

• Establishing a data collection/analysis system

• Developing a School-Wide Reinforcement System

OUR TIMELINE 2014-2015

Beginning Installation

• Spring 2015 – Beginning to establish some Universal components

• Defining School-Wide Behavioral Expectations

• Establishing a data collection/analysis system

• Developing a School-Wide Reinforcement System

www.pbisapps.org

OUR TIMELINE 2014-2015

Beginning Installation

• Spring 2015– Beginning to establish some Universal components

• Defining School-Wide Behavioral Expectations

• Establishing a data collection/analysis system

• Developing a School-Wide Reinforcement System

AFTER YEAR 1

“Change is hard because people overestimate the value of what they have and underestimate the value of what they may gain by giving that up.” – James Belasco and Ralph Stayer Flight of the Buffalo (1994)

ARE WE BOUGHT-IN YET?

• Where’s the discipline?

• Why do we reward for what they should already do?

• What’s your background/what are your credentials?

• How are prizes going to change behavior?

• This is too elementary/juvenile

• Probation is the only answer

• Just move them to another site

15% of Staff

ARE WE BOUGHT-IN YET?

• How will we recognize high attendance?

• Wow! [student] has really improved!

• Let’s find a way to better handle transition time.

• Call home because [student]’s test scores went up!

• Let’s adjust lunch routines and see if that helps.

• Kids, make a rap about the Behavior Matrix (teacher and students battle)

• We need accurate data/let’s track those behaviors

• We need Tier 2 interventions. 85% of Staff

AFTER YEAR 1

Staffing

•2 new administrators

•2 new teachers

•2 new paraprofessionals

•1 new probation officer

•shift in coordinator/ psychologist

Process •New SST process

•Adjusted intake/student handbook

Practices •Down with detention

•Discipline/Restorative Practices

OUR TIMELINE 2015-2016

• SWIS training for Administrators

• Finding common availability and tech resources

• Training materials on SWIS

• Practice/Follow up

• Outcomes:

• Data more available at sites

• Finding needs for interventions

• Data keeping/integrity improving

OUR TIMELINE 2015-2016

• Consistency following summer 2015

• Student reinforcement survey

• Weekly “bank accounts” updated by main office

• Sites open student store for purchasing items/activities

• Monthly attendance awards/prizes

• Sites finding other special activities and acknowledgements

• Finding ways to recognize families/bring in parents

Reinforcement

OUR TIMELINE 2015-2016

• Admin using more de-escalation skills

• Looking at renewing staff de-escalation training

• Continue to work away from “Punishment” mindset

• Having students reflect on misbehavior

• Clarifying role of Probation on sites and collaborating with admin

• Continue to work on consistency with classroom management

Consequences/Discipline

• Coordination with Transportation Department

• Established Bus behavior

matrix • Reinforcement & discipline

procedures • Re-train drivers on writing

referrals

OUR TIMELINE 2015-2016 BUS

OUR TIMELINE 2016-2017

• All staff trained/refresher in Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training

• Introduction to Professional Learning Communities (PLC)

• Incorporating Chromebooks into classrooms

• Updated grading policies

• Introduction to Check-In Check-Out (CICO)

• Utilizing Restorative Practices in disciplinary responses

• Began training and installing PBIS in juvenile court school

PREPARING FOR CHANGES

Staffing

• Declining enrollment – adjustments in staffing

Process • Redefining

teaming and roles

Practices

• Continue improving Tier 1 supports and look to further develop Tier 2 and Tier 3

OUTCOMES SO FAR

• Drop in referrals

OUTCOMES SO FAR

• Increase in attendance

• 2014-2015 - 74%

• 2015-2016 - 78%

• 2016-2017 - 80%

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

14/15 15/16 16/17

Attendance

OUTCOMES SO FAR • Drop in rate of suspension

• 2014-2015 - 32.96%

• 2015-2016 - 20.70%

• 2016-2017 - 14.57%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

14/15 15/16 16/17

Rate of Suspension

AGENCY PARTNERS

• Included in staff meetings

• Give out reinforcement to students

• Working on relationship at administrative level

• Defining roles and where/how to work together

• Including agency partners in Student Support Teams

AGENCY PARTNERS

• They have access to resources outside of school

• Act as community liaisons and help problem solve for students

• Communication on systems/functions

• Common goal for students

Celebrations • Very strong administrative

support • Much accomplished

quickly • Staff buy-in increasing • Progress increased when

sites took ownership • Reinforcement for staff as

well as students • Advanced planning for

change • Collaboration

• across roles/sites

Critiques • Developing more support

for implementers • Site-based leadership

team roles/meetings to be identified and practiced more clearly

• Difficulty in moving

program quicker than rate of culture change

• Preparing for changing landscape of program

People and Organizations • Dr. Jeff Sprague, consultant

• Email: [email protected]

• Mobile: (541)521-4450

• PBIS North West Network • http://pbisnetwork.org

• Association for Positive Behavior Support • www.apbs.org

• California PBIS Coalition • https://www.pbis.org/pbis-network/california

• California Technical Assistance Center on PBIS • www.pbiscaltac.org

RESOURCES WE USE

Tools/Data • SWIS Data System

• www.pbisapps.org

• Scanners – Opticon Inc. • 800-636-0090

• www.opticonusa.com • Model # OPN2004

RESOURCES WE USE

CONTACT US

Amanda Thomas Assistant Principal [email protected]

Lina Bender School Psychologist/Program Coordinator [email protected]