Outline of Presentation
-
Upload
beau-dixon -
Category
Documents
-
view
23 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Outline of Presentation
Society for Risk Analysis MeetingSociety for Risk Analysis Meeting5-8 December 20045-8 December 2004
Improving Government Risk Improving Government Risk Management and Appraisal of Risk to Management and Appraisal of Risk to
the Publicthe Public
Brian GlicksmanBrian Glicksman
2
Outline of PresentationOutline of Presentation• Context Context
• The Risk Programme The Risk Programme
• Key issues and Actions Key issues and Actions
• Managing risks to the public Managing risks to the public
• Appraisal of risks – assessing risk Appraisal of risks – assessing risk perceptions perceptions
• The futureThe future
4
We are taking on We are taking on more risk - focus is on more risk - focus is on
delivery delivery
• Aiming high – targets focus us on Aiming high – targets focus us on outcomesoutcomes
• Achieving outcomes is complex and Achieving outcomes is complex and hard-workhard-work
• Will only happen if risks that can knock Will only happen if risks that can knock us off course are anticipated, and us off course are anticipated, and managed wellmanaged well
5
Project failuresProject failures
Departments continue to suffer, particularly in:• New complex IT systems
• Traditional procurement programmes
7
Pace of change brings both Pace of change brings both opportunity opportunity andand
uncertainty...uncertainty...
10
Public more aware & want Public more aware & want more say in risk mattersmore say in risk matters
Better educated & aware
Demand high standards and actions to address concerns
Demand more openness and clear evidence
Demand more influence and choice
Prepared to litigate
11
Trust is an issue… Trust is an issue…
Family Family Doctors, Doctors,
Teachers, Teachers, Local PoliceLocal Police
Business LeadersBusiness Leaders
Senior Civil Senior Civil ServantsServants
Real Estate Real Estate Agents/ Agents/ ““Red-top” Red-top” journalistsjournalists
Greenpeace/Greenpeace/AmnestyAmnesty
Trust in individuals Trust in individuals andand
institutions, 2003institutions, 2003
Low trust means: less Low trust means: less support for innovation support for innovation and change; more and change; more demand for regulationdemand for regulation
PoliticiansPoliticians
Source: Market & Opinion Research International
13
Risk PRisk Programme rogramme --improving government improving government
capabilitycapability
• 2 yr programme of change 2 yr programme of change
• Civil Service Management Board Civil Service Management Board
GroupGroup
• Cross-government networksCross-government networks
• Learning from public/private sectorsLearning from public/private sectors
• Treasury Chief Secretary Reports to Treasury Chief Secretary Reports to
Prime MinisterPrime Minister
14
What is our Aim?What is our Aim?• Embedded risk management - Embedded risk management -
skills, guidance, structures, skills, guidance, structures, incentives, cultureincentives, culture
• Effective - anticipation, Effective - anticipation, decision-making, decision-making, preparedness, crisis handling, preparedness, crisis handling, communications, coordination; communications, coordination; fewer adverse reports from fewer adverse reports from auditors/politicians auditors/politicians
• Policies, targets, projects are Policies, targets, projects are being delivered; public safety, being delivered; public safety, confidence, trust are being confidence, trust are being achievedachieved
CapabilitiesCapabilities
Risk HandlingRisk Handling
Better Better outcomesoutcomes
15
Innovation and Innovation and well-managed risk takingwell-managed risk taking
Current Current performancperformanc
ee
New New endeavours/ endeavours/ stretching stretching
targetstargets
““Self Self imposed” imposed”
riskrisk
Operational Operational riskrisk
External External threatsthreats
16
Key ChallengesKey Challenges
• Leadership Leadership • Embedding in business processes Embedding in business processes • Risk in policy makingRisk in policy making• Managing risks with partnersManaging risks with partners• Managing risks to the public Managing risks to the public • Learning from good practiceLearning from good practice
18
Principles:Principles:
Openness & transparencyOpenness & transparency
Involvement Involvement
Proportionality and consistencyProportionality and consistency
Evidence for policies, actions, Evidence for policies, actions, decisionsdecisions
Responsibility and choiceResponsibility and choice
• Use of arm’s length bodiesUse of arm’s length bodies
• Early and regular communicationEarly and regular communication
Building public trust Building public trust and understanding…and understanding…
19
Implementing the principles
• Involving Government networks Involving Government networks •Communications – information directorsCommunications – information directors•Decision making - policy makersDecision making - policy makers•Evidence – scientists; economists and other analystsEvidence – scientists; economists and other analysts
• Wider engagementWider engagement – academics, stakeholders– academics, stakeholders• Guidance Guidance
• Supplement to HMT guidance on investment Supplement to HMT guidance on investment appraisalappraisal• A tool for structured assessment of public concernsA tool for structured assessment of public concerns• Communicating Risk to the Public Communicating Risk to the Public
20
Proportionality and consistency
• Guidance on appraisal of risks to the publicGuidance on appraisal of risks to the public
• Current consultation on this new guidanceCurrent consultation on this new guidance• Guidance includes:Guidance includes:
• “ “benchmark” for Government spending to benchmark” for Government spending to prevent a fatality (£1m – £1.5m from road prevent a fatality (£1m – £1.5m from road transport ‘willingness to pay’ (WTP) studies); and transport ‘willingness to pay’ (WTP) studies); and to reduce harm of £20-30k per Quality Adjusted to reduce harm of £20-30k per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY)Life Year (QALY)
• Consideration for public and expert risk Consideration for public and expert risk perceptions perceptions
• Assessment tool for public concernsAssessment tool for public concerns
21
Consultation on concerns
• Proactive, two-way communication• Consultation to capture structured, informed
and considered views• Challenge and varied perspectives valued in
building the evidence base• Not from a self-selected source• Not groupthink• Not media judgements
22
Assessment FrameworkAssessment Framework
• Categories of concern:Categories of concern:• Hazard: familiarity; understandingHazard: familiarity; understanding• Effects: equity; dreadEffects: equity; dread• Management: control; trustManagement: control; trust
• Levels of concern: Levels of concern: • 1-5 to indicate increasing degree of 1-5 to indicate increasing degree of
concernconcern
23
Level 1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 2 Level 3 Level 3 Level 4 Level 4 Level 5 Level 5
e.g. effects e.g. effects are trivial, are trivial, temporary temporary and and commonplacecommonplace
e.g. effects e.g. effects potentially potentially serious but serious but treatabletreatable
e.g. effects e.g. effects are serious, are serious, long-term but long-term but considered considered naturalnatural
e.g. effects e.g. effects are serious, are serious, permanent permanent and raise and raise ethical ethical concernsconcerns
e.g. effects e.g. effects are are catastrophic, catastrophic, permanent permanent and highly and highly fearedfeared
Evidence:Evidence:How serious are the effects?How serious are the effects?How long-term are the effects?How long-term are the effects?How feared are the effects?How feared are the effects?
Eg Effects: Fear (Dread)Eg Effects: Fear (Dread)
Concern assessment Concern assessment frameworkframework
24
Decisions on managing Decisions on managing risks to the publicrisks to the public
Concern factors
Expert views
Public views
1 Familiarity
2 Understanding
3 Equity
4 Dread
5 Control
6 Trust
Deaths Harm
CBA, including…CBA, including… Societal ConcernsSocietal Concerns
‘Baseline’ WTP
Decision making
25
Future: culture change…
• Everyone is a risk manager• Knows the risks faced, how to manage them, and how this
links to achieving the organisation’s objectives• Looks for opportunity• Clear on risk appetite• Knows when to escalate risk
• More risk-based service provision• Clear objectives with• Resources targeted at risks
• Risks to public managed effectively• Proportionate action• Taking account of public perceptions• Communicating effectively
26
www.risk-support.gov.ukwww.risk-support.gov.uk
email to: email to: [email protected]@hm-treasury.gov.uk
For further information ….For further information ….