Outline of Cross-Border Consumer Center Japan (CCJ) June 2015 Consumer Affairs Agency Japan.
-
Upload
kelly-horton -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Outline of Cross-Border Consumer Center Japan (CCJ) June 2015 Consumer Affairs Agency Japan.
Outline of Cross-Border Consumer Center Japan (CCJ)
June 2015
Consumer Affairs Agency Japan
2
It is becoming increasingly easier to do business across borders due to the globalization economy and the spread of Internet usage.
- Rapidly Expanding E-Commerce Market in Japan - - Increasing Cross-Border Business -
Source: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry’s “FY2013 Report on the Foundation of an Information and Service Economic Society in Japan (Market Survey on E-Commerce)”
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
60,890 66,960 77,880 84,590 95,130 111,660
Size of the B to C and E-Commerce Market in Japan (2008 - 2013)
E-Commerce Market
Globalization of Economy and Expanding Internet Usage
United States719.7
billion yen
China807.2
billion yen
Size of consumer cross-border e-commerce market in 2013 between Japan, the United States and China (estimated total)
The arrow indicates the direction of the sale
Indicates the total cross-border e-commerce purchase amount
173.6 billion yen
432.3 billion yen
390.2 billion yen
17.9 billion yen
417.1 billion yen
285.7 billion yen
(Hundreds of millions of yen)
Japan19191.5 billion
yen
3
Examples of Problems with Cross-border e-Commerce in Japan
• Counterfeit goods delivered
• Paid but not delivered
• Defective / Broken products delivered
• Delay in delivery
• Unauthorized Charges
• No response from the retailers
4
Cross-border Consumer Center Japan (CCJ)
• Assisting the resolution of disputes over transactions between Japanese consumers and overseas business entities or between consumers in other countries and Japanese businesses
Roles
• Established by the Consumer Affairs Agency of Japan (CAA) in November, 2011
Establishment
• Providing advisory services and information related to cross-border transaction upon the request from consumers by e-mail, fax or web-site
• Operated/funded by the CAA until the end of March, 2015
• From April, 2015, operated/funded by the National Consumer Affairs Center (NCAC)
• Entrusting practical operations of the CCJ to the private sector
Operation
55
• To solve consumer problems with cross-border transactions, CCJ cooperates with 6 overseas organizations
CCJ’ s Overseas Partners
Spain
CCJMarch 2014 ~
United States and Canada
November 2011 ~
Central and South America
February 2012 ~
Taiwan
November 2011 ~Vietnam
January 2015 ~
Singapore
November 2011 ~
6
Consultation Flowchart
Japan Overseas
4. Translate and convey answers
2. Translate and convey consultation details and seeks
advice regarding solutions
BusinessesConsumers
Problem
1. Consultation
1’. Consultation
Nation-wide consumer affairs centers
5’. Advice
5. Convey answersoffer advice
Support
ConsumersBusinesses
Problem
1. Consultation
CCJ: Cross-border Consumer Center Japan
3. Conveys consultation detailspresents solutions
5. Convey answersoffer advice
Overseas consumer affairs organizations
(Six organizations in the United States, Singapore, etc.)
3. Conveys consultation detailspresents solutions
• The sole organization dealing with cross-border consumer complaints
• Mutual relationships with overseas consumer support organizations
7
Problems between Japanese consumers
and US businesses (Example)
1. A problem occurs between a Japanese consumer and US
business
2. Consumer consults with CCJ
3. CCJ conveys the details to the BBB in the US, one of CCJ's
overseas partner
4. The BBB conveys the consultation details to the business
and agrees on a solution
5. CCJ conveys the answer from the business to the consumer
6. The transaction is performed between the consumer and
the business based on the agreed solution
Problems between US consumers and
Japanese businesses (Example)
1. A problem occurs between a US consumer and Japanese
business
2. The consumer consults with the BBB 3. The consultation
details are conveyed from the BBB to CCJ
4. The consultation details are conveyed from CCJ to the
business and a solution is agreed upon
5. The BBB conveys the answer from the business to the
consumer
6. The transaction is performed between the consumer and
business based on the agreed solution
• Handling consumer complaints in the following steps.
Handling Consumer Complaints
8
The number of consumer complaints to CCJ increases year-over-year.
There are some months with an unusually large number of consultations and this is due to a large number of consultations* for a specific product or service.
11/10
11/11
11/12
12/01
12/02
12/03
12/04
12/05
12/06
12/07
12/08
12/09
12/10
12/11
12/12
13/01
13/02
13/03
13/04
13/05
13/06
13/07
13/08
13/09
13/10
13/11
13/12
14/01
14/02
14/03
14/04
14/05
14/06
14/07
14/08
14/09
14/10
14/11
14/12
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
21
123147
193
156138
107
169143154154146
192
220225249253
478
246
399
332341
293
366
421
471
366
503
363
407413418
331
303
345334
382
303
335
Monthly average 166 (2012)
Monthly average 369 (2014)
Monthly average 351 (2013)
Number of Consumer Complaints Received by CCJ
* Specifically Example 6 and Example 7 in 4. Consultation Examples. (Page 30 – 31).
9
Almost all consultations are related to e-commerce.
The cross-border e-commerce market for consumers is estimated to continue increasing in the future* and this trend is forecast to continue.
E-Commerce97%
Local Purchase2%
Other1%
Type of Transaction
E-Commerce
Local Purchase
Other
Type of Transaction
(n=10,940)
* According to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry’s “FY2013 Report on the Foundation of an Information and Service Economic Society in Japan (Market Survey on E-Commerce)”, the size of the cross-border e-commerce consumer market among Japan, the United States and China will increase from 1.7 trillion yen (estimated) in 2013 to maximum 4.1 trillion yen in 2020.
Type of Transaction
No. of Cases Share
E-commerce 10,576 97%
Local purchase 221 2%
Other 143 1%
Total 10,940 100%
10
Credit card49%
Financial insti-tution transfer
43%
Payment agency2%
Cash1%
Other3% Unclear
2%
Payment Method
Credit card
Financial institution transfer
Payment agency
Cash
Other
Unclear
Credit card payments make up more than half of all payment methods.
Because fraudulent businesses prefer to receive payment through bank transfers, “financial institution transfers” also make up a large portion of payments.*
(n=10,940)
Payment Method No. of Cases Share
Credit card 5,366 49%
Financial institution transfer 4,755 43%
Payment agency 239 2%
Cash 73 1%
Other 281 3%
Unclear 226 2%
Total 10,940 100%
Payment Method
* Businesses must wait to receive payment in case of credit cards from the credit card company. On the other hand, businesses can receive payments from bank accounts immediately and this is why it is thought fraudulent businesses prefer “financial institution transfers”.
11
Imitation product de-
livered18%
Suspected fraud33%
Merchandise not delivered
13%
Contract termination
21%
Unauthorized charges
4%
Returns3%
Defective product2%
Other7%
Type of Problem Imitation product delivered
Suspected fraud
Merchandise not delivered
Contract termina-tion
Unauthorized charges
Returns
Defective product
Other
A majority of problems involve fraudulent businesses (“imitation product delivered”* and “suspected fraud”).
Other problems include (contract termination (21%)” and “merchandise not delivered (13%)”).
(n=10,940)
Type of Problem No. of cases Share
Imitation product delivered 2,017 18%
Suspected fraud 3,608 33%
Merchandise not delivered 1,368 13%
Contract termination 2,284 21%
Unauthorized charges 399 4%
Returns 289 3%
Defective products 191 2%
Other 784 7%
Total 10,940 100%
Type of Problem
* “Suspected fraud” includes cases where even though consumers are able to confirm orders or payments, communication is cut off with the business without anything being delivered (or the business doesn’t respond in a reasonable way) and the consumers cannot accurately grasp the situation of the business. The meaning of “Imitation product delivered” can be taken broadly to mean fraudulent, but this has been differentiated in order to grasp the facts and trends of imitation products being delivered. “Merchandise not delivered” is used when the existence of the business can be confirmed and is different than “Suspected fraud”.
12
The highest number of consultation of cases * concerned China at 38%. Next was the United States at 29% and these two countries made up 70% of all cases.
Country/Region of Business
* From the total number of 10,940 consultation cases, 3,184 cases which the business location was unknown and 153 cases which the business location was in Japan were excluded and a total of 7,603 cases was set as the parameter.
China38%
United States29%
England6%
Hong Kong4%
India3%
Netherlands3%
South Korea2%
Taiwan1%
Thailand1%
Germany1%
France1% Other counties /
regions8%
Country/Region of Business
ChinaUnited StatesEnglandHong KongIndiaNetherlandsSouth KoreaTaiwanThailandGermanyFranceOther counties / regions
(n=7,603)
13
• Releasing regularly case examples based on consumer consultations to CCJ and providing tips to avoid problems related to cross-border transactions
Statistical data is used to easily explain trending problems
Each case example shows useful advice and points to solve and prevent problems
Efforts for Protecting Consumers from Problems (1)
14
• Released a list of features of counterfeit selling websites for protecting consumers against them (February, 2013)
(*) Information on the website is updated periodically.
(Example) Website confirmed to sell imitation products
Efforts for Protecting Consumers from Problems (2)
• Has regularly released the names and URLs of overseas malicious websites
(280 as of the end of May, 2015)
15
Summary
• Operated more than three years
• Total number of consultations since the establishment: more than 11,000
• Accumulating know-how for handling consumer complaints related to cross-border transactions
• Developing into a permanent entity and having more stable operations
• Consumer issues with overseas shopping continue to increase in Japan
• Hoping to expand cooperation relationship with overseas organizations