Outline Mystery of the missing equation The Phillips curve as solution to the mystery of the missing...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Outline Mystery of the missing equation The Phillips curve as solution to the mystery of the missing...
Outline
•Mystery of the missing equation
•The Phillips curve as solution to the mystery of the missing equation
•Phillips curve as a “policy menu.”
•Aggregate supply and the Phillips Curve
•The short-run Phillips curve
•The long-run Phillips curve
•Policy implications of the NAIRU
Mystery of the missing equation
•A frequent knock on Keynesian business cycle theory was its (alleged) failure to incorporate the price level as an endogenous variable—that is, there is no equation that links price level movements to changes in real GDP, employment, the balance of trade, etcetera.
•A path-breaking article by New Zealander A.W. Phillips in 1958 presented a solution to the mystery
The Phillips contribution1
1A.W. Phillips. “The Relation Between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wages in the U.K., 1861-1957,” Economica, Nov. 1958
Data points for the U.K. (annual)
Unemployment rate0Rat
e of
cha
nge
of m
oney
wag
es
Phillips empirical study indicated an inverse relationship between
unemployment and the rate of increase of money wages
Professors Samuelson and Solow carried the Phillips’ work a step further by suggesting an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. The data for the U.S. appeared to back this up.
The Samuelson-Solow Contribution1
1P. Samuelson and R. Solow. “Analytical Aspects of Anti-Inflation Policy,” American Economic Review, May 1960.
Inflation-Unemployment Pairs for the U.S., 1955-69
Unemployment Rate
7.06.56.05.55.04.54.03.53.0
Inflati
on R
ate
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
69
68
67
66
65
64
6362
61
6059 58
5756
55
www.bls.gov
Inflation-Unemployment Pairs for the U.S., 1955-69
Unemployment Rate
7.06.56.05.55.04.54.03.53.0
Inflati
on R
ate
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
69
68
67
66
65
64
6362
61
6059 58
5756
55
www.bls.gov
Phillips curve
The (inverted J) shape of the Phillips curve apparently gives policy makers an exploitable trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Moreover, the champions of the Phillips curve believed that the policy trade-off was “stable”—that is, the terms of the trade-off would hold up over time
Policy target
Phillips curve
The (MIT) Keynesian view went like this: Find the “politically acceptable” trade-off
and use “active” aggregate demand management to achieve it.
Unemployment rate
Infl
atio
n ra
te
0
3 central points:
1. The Phillips curve “harbors a fundamental defect, namely, that the supply of labor is a function of the nominal wage.” This violates a basic axiom of microeconomic theory.
2. “There is no long run trade-off between inflation and unemployment.” Suggests there may be a short-run trade-off.
3. The long run Phillips curve is vertical at the NAIRU or natural rate of unemployment.
1Milton Friedman. “The Role of Monetary Policy,”AER, 58(1), March 1968, 1-17.
The Friedman critique of the Phillips curve1
Professor Friedman delivered a blistering attack on the Phillips curve at the American Economic Association meeting in 1967
What is the NAIRU?•NAIRU is an acronym for the “non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment.”
•The NAIRU, or alternatively, the “natural rate” of unemployment, is that level of unemployment corresponding to equilibrium in the Classical labor market.
•The NAIRU is also defined as the rate of unemployment consistent with an unchanging (but not necessarily zero) inflation rate.
•Corresponding to the natural rate of unemployment is the “natural” level of real GDP.
Definitions
•UA is the actual rate of unemployment
•UT is the target rate of unemployment
•UN is the NAIRU or natural rate of unemployment
A is the actual rate of inflation
E is the expected rate of inflation
•LRPC is the long run Phillips curve
•SRPC is the short-run Phillips curve
What is the difference between the short-run and the long-run?
In the long-run, agents correctly forecast inflation, that is:
AE
“Adaptive” Expectations
1 tA
tE
Which is to say that agents react to changes in the price level with a one-period lag.
A key issue is how do agents form
expectations about future inflation. Here
we have a simple rule.
Expected inflation in period t is equal to actual inflation in the period t – 1. That is:
E > AE < A
LRPC E = A
Infl
atio
n ra
te
0 Unemployment rateUN
The long-run Phillips curve is vertical at the NAIRU
SRPC2 :E =12%
SRPC1: E = 3%
LRPC E = A
Infl
atio
n ra
te
0 Unemployment rateUN
Short-run Phillips curves intersect the long-run Phillips curve at the expected rate of inflation
3
12
SP2
SP1
LP E = A
Infl
atio
n ra
te
0 Unemployment rateUN
2.0
4.6
UT
8.1
SP3 SP4
S
Monetary deceleration produces stagflation
Monetarism took off in the 1970s
•The monetarists, led by Professor Milton Friedman, experienced rising influence as inflation became public enemy number 1 in the 1970s.
•Economists such as Edmund Phelps, Robert Lucas, and Thomas Seargent, subsequently added important modifications to the monetarist theory.
Inflation-Unemployment pairs for the U.S., 1960-89
Unemployment Rate
109876543
Inflati
on
Rate
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
8988
87
86
8584
83
82
81
80
79
78
7776
75
74
73
72
71
7069
68
6766
65
646362
6160
1960-69
1980-83
Summary•Money is non-neutral in the short-run—that is, unanticipated changes in the supply of money can affect output and employment, as well as prices, in the short run.
•In the long-run, money is neutral.
•Deviations of the economy from its “natural” growth path are explained mainly by erratic or unforeseen changes in the money supply of money.
•Monetarists favor policy rules.