Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES Measure Recommendations

29
Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES Measure Recommendations Regional Technical Forum July 15, 2014

description

Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES Measure Recommendations. Regional Technical Forum July 15, 2014. Presentation Outline. Background Measure Overview Staff Highlighted Areas UES Workbook Measure Descriptions Measure Analysis and Input Details Savings, Cost, and Cost Effectiveness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES Measure Recommendations

Page 1: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES Measure Recommendations

Regional Technical ForumJuly 15, 2014

Page 2: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

2

Presentation Outline• Background• Measure Overview• Staff Highlighted Areas• UES Workbook

– Measure Descriptions– Measure Analysis and Input Details– Savings, Cost, and Cost Effectiveness

• RTF Staff Recommendation• Proposed Decision

Page 3: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

3

Background• Multiple Grocery measures found Out-of-Compliance

– Subsequent analysis determined remaining potential small– Extended sunset date at November 2013 meeting– Staff to develop plan to bring back into compliance

• Grocery measures in question:1. ECMs for Walk-ins – Done2. Walk-in Evaporator Fan ECMotor Controllers – Done3. Compressor Head Fan Motor Retrofit to ECM – Done 4. Display Case LEDs (Open Cases) - Done5. Floating Head Pressure Controls for Single Compressor Systems - Done6. Door Gasket Replacement - Done7. Auto Door Closers8. Strip Curtains

Page 4: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

4

Background – Remaining PotentialRegional Priority Sector Measure

Remaining Potential

aMW (Cadmus)

Remaining Potential aMW for

next 2 years (PECI)

Notes

1 Grocery Grocery - Display Case LEDs (Open Cases)

0.48 N/A Measure of interest for PECI

2 Grocery Grocery - Floating Head Pressure Controls for Single Compressor Systems

0.46 0.06 Remaining potential is small for PECI program (when measure is limited to grocery sector)

3 Grocery Grocery - Autoclosers 0.26 0.21 Remaining potential is small for PECI program

3 Grocery Grocery - Door Gasket Replacement 0.65 0.021 Remaining potential is small for PECI program

3 Grocery Grocery - Strip Curtains 1.61 0.015 Remaining potential is small for PECI program

Note: Remaining potential based on PNW territory only.

Page 5: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

5

What hasn’t been done

• Estimating measure interactions very limited– Only looked at HVAC interaction within measure– Possible to have interactions among measures

RTF Measure Interactions

Auto Door Closers

Display Case LEDs (Open Cases)

Door Gasket Replacement

Floating Head Pressure Controls for Single Compressor Systems

Strip Curtains

Auto Door Closers   x x

Display Case LEDs (Open Cases)  

Door Gasket Replacement x   x

Floating Head Pressure Controls for Single Compressor Systems

 

Strip Curtains x x  

Page 6: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

6

RTF direction to take

• Last time RTF agreed with staff recommendation to ignore interactions for these small saver grocery measures– Staff estimate is that interactions are likely small

and do not warrant further research– Furthermore, estimation methods of measures are

varied and it may not be practical to reliably determine interactions

Page 7: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

7

Door Auto Closer on walk-ins and reach-ins

Page 8: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

8

Measure Overview

• What does it do?– Installs a new Door Auto Closer on existing walk-in

or reach-in case that either has one that is broken or does not have one at all

– Savings occur from:• Runtime reduction on refrigeration system• Load reduction on store HVAC heating system

– Assuming grocery stores heat most of the year

Page 9: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

9

Recommendation Memo ItemsRecommendation Memo Item Staff Response

The amount of time that doors are normally unintentionally left ajar, the Doorway Open Time Factor, is set at 25% of daily hours for all four measures. This assumption needs to be based on measured data.

Staff has no basis for estimating the Doorway Open Time Factor. Staff has assumed 25% for the purposes of this analysis, but note that this value could reasonably be between 0% and 100%. Savings are directly proportional to this value. Door open time is based on ADM study and PECI measured data from gasket test as a baseline.

The savings figure for the reach-in glass doors medium temperature measure is estimated assuming a 66% factor of the reach-in glass door low temperature measure figures. Support with data.

Small saver negates need to collect primary data. Professional Judgment will be used.

Page 10: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

10

Staff Highlighted Areas• Unintentional door open time

– Based on professional judgment only– Savings vary by orders of magnitude within the

range of reasonable assumptions

Page 11: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

11

Unintentional Door Open Time

• Value is meant to represent time door is left unintentionally open (i.e. almost closed)– Not the same as door open/close times for

accessing product• Gasket study open times as a reality test

Weighted average of all sites Mean

Minutes open per day

Autocloser reduction in

unintentional time left open

Minutes unintentionally

left open per day

Hours unintentionally

left open per day

Low-temp Reach-in Avg. 5.0% 71 25.0% 18 0.3Med-temp Reach-in Avg. 3.6% 52 25.0% 13 0.2Low-temp Walk-in Avg. 4.5% 64 25.0% 16 0.3Med-temp Walk-in Avg. 24.3% 350 25.0% 87 1.5

Page 12: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

12

Unintentional Door Open Time• But savings are directly proportional to this

estimate, with no data to support it

Reach-in Low Temp (LT) Reach-in Med. Temp (MT)0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Reach-in Autocloser Savings

10% 25% 50% 75%

Savi

ngs (

kWh/

yr)

Walk-in Low Temp (LT) Walk-in Med. Temp (MT)0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

Walk-in Autocloser Savings

10% 25% 50% 75%

Savi

ngs (

kWh/

yr)

Page 13: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

13

Savings, Cost, & Cost Effectiveness

• Go to the following sections in the Presentation tab in the proposed measure workbook:– Measure savings– Measure costs– Measure TRC B/C ratios

Page 14: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

14

RTF Staff Recommendation• Deactivate measure due to high uncertainty in

Doorway Open Time Factor and resulting high uncertainty in savings.

• Set the measure status to “Deactivated”

Page 15: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

15

Proposed Decision

“I _______________ move that the RTF set the measure status of the ‘Door Auto Closer’ measure to ‘Deactivated.’”

Page 16: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

16

Strip Curtains on Walk-ins

Page 17: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

17

Measure Overview

• What does it do?– Installs a strip curtain on a walk-in freezer or

cooler where none existed before (so my picture was a little misleading)

– Savings occur from:• Load reduction of refrigeration system• Load reduction on store HVAC heating system

– Assuming grocery stores heat most of the year

Page 18: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

18

Recommendation Memo ItemsRecommendation Memo Item Staff Response

The measure definition should clarify whether or not the measure applies to walk-in units with loading dock exterior doors. The average environmental temperatures used in the ADM HIM report apparently include some fraction of exterior spaces.

The HVAC interaction factor has a small impact on savings. However infiltration air is large. Professional judgment needed.

Research Plan called for the collection of Time Door Open per Day for both pre- and post-installation periods to ensure the savings calculations account for any post installation variation in door open times. Results were presented from metering in August 2011, which showed that the results were not statistically significant. New data is needed.

Should we use non-statistically significant data for this parameter? Professional judgment needed. However, savings only range by a factor of 2 over a very wide range of assumptions.

The values for the Temperature of Surroundings parameter, which are found on the “Assumptions” worksheets for the various building types, need to be based on regional measured data.

If limited to walk-ins that no exterior doors, likely that surrounding temperatures are similar in CA grocery stores compared to the PNW.

Page 19: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

19

Staff Highlighted Areas• Temperature of Surroundings Parameter

– Some walk-ins open to unconditioned spaces– No adjustment for PNW compared to CA

• Strip Curtain Takeback– Do door open times increase after strip curtains are

installed?– Results are only moderately sensitive to this effect.

• Strip Curtain EUL– CA program evaluation found that measure was

typically replaced well before commonly assumed lifetime.

Page 20: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

20

Temperature of Surroundings• Used to determine infiltration air temp• A small swing of infiltration temp produces a large swing in savings

– Savings increase as infiltration temp increases• ADM study results use storage area temps in respective

establishments– These include some indoor and unconditioned zones

• No easy way to access ADM data on climate zone weightings to discern % of outdoor/indoor walk-ins used

• Recommend limiting measure eligibility to walk-ins that open to conditioned spaces only– Likely that storage areas/grocery stores same in PNW and CA– Walk-ins that open to outdoor spaces have higher infiltration air temps;

savings potential may be much larger

Page 21: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

21

Strip Curtain Takeback

• Door open time is a primary determinant• Some data on pre-install door open time• No statistical data on the ratio of post- to pre-

install door open times• Some anecdotal evidence does suggest significant

takeback can occur (i.e. post/pre ratio > 1)• Results only vary by a factor of 2 across a wide

range of assumptions (from post/pre ratio of 0.25 to 3).

Page 22: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

22

Example of Pre- and Post- Door Open Times

PECI Data- Cooler (n=10)

PECI Data- Freezer (n=3)

CPUC Data- Cooler (n=14)

CPUC Data- Freezer (n=9)

BPA Data- Cooler (n=10)

BPA Data- Freezer (n=4)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Pre

Post

Door

Ope

n Ti

me

(Min

/Day

)

August 2011 RTF presentation

Page 23: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

23

Example of Pre- and Post- Door Open Times

December 2007 BPA M&V presentation

Page 24: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

24

Strip Curtain Takeback• Effect of varying post-install times on savings.

- 200 400 600 800

Annual Savings by Post-Case Open Time Scenario

25% of pre-case open time 100% of pre-case open time200% of pre-case open time 300% of pre-case open time

Savi

ngs

(kW

h/yr

/sqf

t)

Page 25: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

25

Strip Curtain Takeback

• Recommend incorporating some level of takeback in estimate to – reflect anecdotal evidence – place savings in the middle of the range of

reasonable estimates• Staff using a ratio of 2:1 for post-pre door open times

• No significant data on this estimate• Up to RTF professional judgment

Page 26: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

26

Strip Curtain Lifetime• Typical EUL is four years.• However, CA impact evaluation found that

program-installed strip curtains were typically maintained more frequently.

Source: Commercial Facilities Contract Group 2006-2008 Direct Impact Evaluation Study ID: PUC0016.03 Volume 3 of 3 HIM Appendices

These findings suggest a mean time to replacement of 2 to 3 years.

Page 27: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

27

Savings, Cost, & Cost Effectiveness

• Go to the following sections in the Presentation tab in the proposed measure workbook:– Measure savings– Measure costs– Measure TRC B/C ratios

Page 28: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

28

RTF Staff Recommendation• Limit eligibility of measure to walk-ins that

open to conditioned spaces only• Assume a level of takeback that results in

savings in the middle of the range of possible savings. – Staff recommends a post/pre door open time ratio

of 2.• Set measure life to 2.5 years.

Page 29: Out-Of-Compliance Grocery UES  Measure Recommendations

29

Proposed Decision

“I _______________ move that the RTF:

• Approve the ‘Strip Curtain’ measure as a “Small Saver” UES;– Limited to walk-ins that open to conditions spaces only

– Using a post-install to pre-install door open time ratio of 2.0

– Using a measure life of 2.5 years

• Set the measure status to ‘Active;’ and• Set the sunset date to July, 2019.”