Our view on the use of Remote Sensed data for Cross Compliance€¦ · Remote Sensed data for Cross...
Transcript of Our view on the use of Remote Sensed data for Cross Compliance€¦ · Remote Sensed data for Cross...
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 1
Our view on the use of Remote Sensed data for
Cross CompliancePhilippe LOUDJANIMARS-PAC, JRC Ispra
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 2
Background
2005-2007 test of use of RS for GAECs control
Which GAECs detected with RS?Which methods to use?Quantification of resultsUse for risk analysis?Other elements possibly detected (SMRs, AEM …)?
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 3
Results obtained so far
Erosion
Stubble burning
Maintenance of terraces
Maintained
Abandonned
Exceeding livestock stocking rate
Poaching
Maintenance of olive groves
Trees recently pruned
Several elements distinguishable
But…
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 4
Results obtained so far
Distinguishable but:
Almost only via photo interpretationHardly applicable on large extentsNeed of confirmation with field inspection
Anyway farm visit has to be done
No or few quantification of resultsNo feedbacks in the ‘summary statistics’Needed to assess the efficiency (justify additional costs)
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 5
Results obtained so far
No use for Risk AnalysisSize of sample limited 1%Mainly CAPI
Implementation hard on large extentsCostly
Few specific imagery requests by MSExcept for Winter coverAnd small tuning of SPS windows
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 6
So what to do presently?
Support office work on each dossier before systematicfield visit(When GAEC sample is part of the CwRS one)
Locate parcels with possible infringementsPossibly estimate the extent of infringementProduce piece of evidence to farmers
Field control faster and more efficientG1.2.1
Stuble burned
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 7
Needs for office work support?
Booklet for interpreters and controllers
Ground truth photos of infringementsCorresponding imagery
Screen display of examplesExpertise for infringement detection
Visual interpretation keysAutomatic processingAncillary data to use
Diagnostic codes to use
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 8
Ground truth collection - Booklet
Soil erosion – Soil structure (Avoid heavy poaching)Examples from the field Examples from imagery
Specify:- Type of satellite or aerial photography- Date if acquisition- Spectral bands combination- Code to apply- ...
Feeder
Provide elements of expertiseIndicate rules to follow:- Area measurement or not- Take photo as evidence- Sanction or no sanction
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 9
Provide detection strategy
Soil erosionDetection of ploughing and/or crop rows direction
VHR panchromatic image
Borders filter enhancement
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 10
Define a reference situation
Maintenance of olive grovesRetention of landscape features
Digitise features on archive imageDeclaration by farmersUse of OLIGIS
© UK Perspectives
© Space Imaging, Ikonos 2005
reference
Trees planted
Trees removed
New pond
LPIS OrthophotoOr OLIGIS
© Space ImagingIkonos April 2005
Olive trees removed
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 11
Use of additional layers
Use of additional layers to check where GAEC applyIACS-GIS, Natura 2000, DEM, vulnerable zones, Rivers network …
Possible green cover strips locations
ReferenceriversNetwork1/25 000 IGN1/25 000 IGN
5 or 10 metersbuffer
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 12
Evidencing infringements
Use of diagnosis codesG1.1.1 Obligation of minimum soil cover in winterG1.2.1 Prohibition of certain crops on slopes > 10%G2.2.1 Prohibition of burning stubblesG3.0.1 Avoid heavy poaching by animalsG4.4.1 Avoid unwanted vegetation on arable land
Locate and document the infringementVHR QuickBird Image Erosion
ExtentOut of parcelNumber of parcels not compliantOut of farm
G1.1.3
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 13
Sub conclusion
Ease and optimise the work of controller on the field
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 14
So what to do presently?
Extend the use of RS imageryReport also infringements out of GAEC sample
Admin to decide for follow upLetter to farmer, warning, high risk for next campaign …
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 15
So what to do presently?
Extend the use of RS imageryDetect or control also SMR, AEM ?
Sludge, organic storage, leak, pollution evidence
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 16
So what to do presently?
Extend the use of RS imagery
Combine GAECs’ criteria with SPS for Risk AnalysisSelection of CwRS sitesGAEC sample within CwRS sampleAfter update of 796/04 legislation
Possible increase of number of targeted CC controls
Possible change number and size of sitesReduce size, increase number
Lead to an increase of controls
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 17
So what to do presently?
Provide relevant information to farmers (digital, paper)Increase awareness on Cross Compliance (FAS)Reduce risk of infringements
Satellite imagery + additional GIS layersLocation of: Parcels in vulnerable zones, rivers and green cover buffer, landscape features to maintain…
Madrid, 12-14 November 2007 – MARS-PAC annual Conference 18
Optimise the use of RS imagery
Prepare the field workDetect GAEC infringement
Detect SMR infringementCheck AEM
Provide documented application
Support risk analysis
Questions ?
Comments ?