Origin of Aids Disease

8/4/2019 Origin of Aids Disease

1/13

Early Hepatitis B Vaccines and the Man-Made Origin of HIV/AIDS

by Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H.

This article regards a matter of global urgency transcending better known AIDS threats.

It describes a universal challenge posed by ever increasing numbers of plagues predictedto depopulate at least half of the worlds current human inhabitants within twogenerations. This documented science virtually proves, through the process ofelimination and a review of the most updated evidence, the origin of HIV/AIDS as aniatrogenic (i.e., man-made) outcome of specific vaccination experiments.

Considered reflection on this AIDS science, along with the sociopolitical correlates andantecedents of this current catastrophe, reveals the likelihood that myriad other immune

dysfunctions, autoimmune diseases, and cancers, including leukemias, lymphomas,sarcomas, and other ailments linked to viral infections, have resulted from previouslyengineered microbes that have by accident or intent found their way from cancer viruslaboratories into humanitys bloodstream by way of the most trusted public healthpreventativevaccinations.If what you are about to read is true, and each point is precisely stated and meticulouslydocumented, beyond extensive depopulation, humanitys very survival may hinge on thisrecognition, its implications, and our considered response. Especially relevant, when

reflecting on the following facts, is the wisdom addressed by the late World HealthOrganization (WHO) AIDS czar, Dr. Jonathan Mann, whose life ended tragically on Flight111 enroute to a European AIDS conference. More than a medical scientific problem,Dr. Mann said, AIDS is a sociopolitical imposition.

BackgroundAIDS is undoubtedly man-made. We can now assert this very apparent iatrogenicorigin, versus the theoretic iatrogenic origin of HIV/AIDS because of the rapidlyincreasing, now substantial, scientific support for this conclusion. Currently, internationalscientific consensus among leading investigators in this field, many of whose works andwords are excerpted below, holds that HIV/AIDS originated from one or more

extraordinary man-made, not natural, events dating back to the early to mid-1970s.Especially implicated in initiating the AIDS pandemic, according to many scientists andscholars, was the hepatitis B vaccine as detailed in the following pages.This may come as a surprise, or even quite a shock, to most people since themainstream media and most respected medical journals have yet to herald the followingknowledge. As a result most authorities still issue false and misleading claims such as:

1) the HB vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS origination has been discussed, debated, anddismissed by an overwhelming majority of the HIV/AIDS research community; 2)People who claim that AIDS was man-made provide false information and hearsay; 3)It is sad that public attention and resources are diverted to attend to such unscientificdribble; 4) Man-made origin of AIDS vaccine proponents do severe damage to thepublic health community and vaccination efforts; and 5) Those that advance man-made theories of AIDS have financial motives, as though there were no financialinterests on the other side of the debate.

As a pro bono consultant contacted recently by Amnesty International (AI) memberswho desired to advance a resolution for the global organization to investigate this HBvaccine thesis, I was appalled by the amount of resistance and politicking performed by

members of AIs so-called HIV/AIDS Task Force which sought $1 billion of relief forhuman rights violations associated with HIV/AIDS from the U.S. Government. Thesefunds, the Task Force reported, were urgently needed to buy drugcocktails for persons


2/13

with HIV/AIDS. Each of the five claims cited above were issued by members of this TaskForce completely ignorant of the following science.

With regard to the first offensive claim, as the sole author of Polio, hepatitis B andAIDS: an integrative theory on a possible vaccine induced pandemicpublished byHarcourt Publishers, Ltd. of London in the esteemed international journal of MedicalHypothesis,2this well-focused thesis has never been discussed, debated, nor

dismissedby any consensus in any official capacity. Although Black Americans havebeen polled regarding the origin of HIV/AIDS being man-made,3there has never been apublished polling of the scientific community in this regard, and certainly not oneregarding the HB hypothesis advanced below.HIV/AIDS Origin Misconceptions Versus ScienceOpponents of iatrogenic (or man-made) theories of AIDS have routinely confusedhearsay and sporadic media propaganda with hard science, such as that discussed,debated and not dismissed recently at the Royal Society of Londons inquiry into theorigin of this pandemic. They exclusively focused on the theory that contaminated poliovaccines triggered the HIV/AIDS pandemic.4These proceedings were published in 2001.Quotes relevant to reasoned consideration of this unique/yet-to-be-tested hepatitis B

vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS follow. These statements were made by featured presenters,all recognized leaders in this multidisciplinary field discussing the polio vaccine theory ofAIDS origination. The first of these quotes is especially relevant toproposed investigations:

There should be an investigation by an international committee mostly composed ofnon-medical people concerning how a rather obvious and plausible theory [of AIDSsorigin from contaminated vaccines] came to be scorned and restricted from publicationfor so long, especially when important consequences regarding mankinds worstepidemic, and even more important consequences for other possibly even worse thatmay be following, hang in the balance. As a corollary it should be studied why thehypothesis had to be promoted mainly by outsiders to science and medicine. Theressures towards investigation (and non-investigation) that emanate from huge drug

companies and their influence in slanting research in subtle ways should also beexamined, as should the role of journals and peer review in potentially obstructingpublications of controversial kinds. W.D. Hamilton,5quoted by Julian Cribb in Theorigin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: can science afford to ignore it? Phil.Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (2001) 356:935-938.

Faced with the terrible burden of AIDS, stories that HIV was introduced into Africa fromthe West by an accident such as OPV [oral polio vaccine] or intentionally by the USACentral Intelligence Agency (CIA) have gained widespread credence. . . . Nevertheless,

because natural transmission repeatedly occurs, albeit on rare occasions, does not meanthat contamination of a vaccine could not have been the route on another occasion. Aswith other infections, e.g., hepatitis B virus,natural and iatrogenic transmissions ofretroviruses are not mutually exclusive.Weiss, RA6Despite studies that have advanced evidence suggesting an earlier than 1970 origin of

HIV/AIDS,7-9[t]he fact that there were ten or so synchronous but distinguishableAfrican epidemics is a definitive feature of AIDS for which the natural transfer theory[e.g., the cut hunter transfer] gives no convincing account. . . . To summarize thesefindings regarding the relatively large number of distinct group M subtypes: no set of

likely natural conditions . . . will adequately simulate so many as ten distinguishablesubtypes in a complex star-like configuration . . . . [T]he onus is upon the supporters of

the natural [not iatrogenic] theory to account for the unexpectedly large number of HIV-1 subtypes. Exponential growth of the epidemic(s) is not by itself a satisfactory
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#5http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#5http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#5http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#5http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2


3/13

explanation (Hahn et al. 2000). . . . The likeliest source of the multiple subtypes and thesynchronization of their conspicuous diversification is a punctuated origin [i.e., an

iatrogenic event]. . . . [I]t is not far-fetched to imagine the ten or so clades derivingfrom a single animal (perhaps immunosuppressed and possessing a swarm of variants)[as might have been the case with chimpanzees used in the process of vaccinemanufacture] or from a few animals that might have belonged to a single troop or might

have been gang-caged together. The number of animals required is secondary to theextent of variation in the source at the time of the zoonotic [i.e., transfer of the virusbetween species] or iatrogenic event. The [vaccine] hypothesis makes a case for such apunctuated origin . . . Myers G, et al.10

We conclude that SIV cannot become a zoonosis, but requires adaptive mutations tobecome HIV. Some modern event must have aided in the transition of SIV to HIV. Ourresearch indicates that serial passage of partially adapted SIV between humans couldproduce the series of cumulative mutations sufficient for the emergence of epidemic HIVstrains . . . We conclude that increased unsterile injecting in Africa during the period1950-1970 provided the agent for SIV human infections to emerge as epidemic HIV inthe modern era. Drucker E, et al.11

I might interject at this point that this conclusion by Drucker et al, although seriouslyundermining natural evolution theorists, reflects a myopic arrogance unbecoming to their

otherwise reasonable hypothesis. Their conclusion neglects the risks inherent in thehepatitis B vaccine manufacturing and testing process as detailed below consistent withthe analyses of Myers et al.10Obviously, all of the above authoritative statementscontradict common knowledge. The consensus of scientists at this historic British AIDSorigin conference favored additional investigations into possible iatrogenic sources of theHIVs.The 1959 HIV Sequence DiscoveryIn the interest of facilitating progress on this issue, much publicity has been given to thenotion that HIV was discovered in a 1959 blood sample from Leopoldville, Zaire;9andthat scientific consensus holds 1931 as the approximate date of HIV origination.7These

superstitions have led to common, yet false, declarations that HIV/AIDS originated wellbefore the polio vaccination era and the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP) that muchevidence below links to the punctuated origin of AIDS.

For the record, according to the authors of the 1959 discovery, they never found, noralleged to have found, HIV, or anything like a full virus. According to these authors, even

attempts to amplify HIV-1 fragments of >300 base pairs (bp) were unsuccessful, . . .However, after numerous attempts, four shorter sequences were obtained that onlyrepresented small portions of two of the six genes of the complete AIDS virus.9

This is why Gao et al, referred to the 1959 sequences as the oldest trace of the AIDSpandemic . . . although the precise timing and circumstance of early events in theSIVcpz/HIV-1 zoonosis remain obscure.22[Editors note for the lay reader, SIVcpz isshort for simian immunodeficiency virus from the chimpanzee. This is know to be theclosest viral relative to the human AIDS virus, HIV-1.]Unfortunately, regarding the 1959 sequences, Zhu et al., left much room for

misinterpretation if not wild speculation by stating that given the starburst phylogeny,HIV-1 was probably introduced into humans shortly before that time frame, about adecade or two earlier than previously estimated. . . .10(Emphasis added.) Theyspeculated the zoonosis might have occurred considerably earlier than the late 1940s.Obviously, this account is irrelevant to the extraordinary synchrony in the 1970s of tenor more distinguishable epidemics discovered by Myers et al.10Therefore, this later
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10


4/13

group of researchers concluded that, with the exception of the 1959 sequencessuggesting viral ancestry, Clinical, serological and molecular retrospective studies haveall failed to produce any evidence of AIDS or HIV prior to the 1970s.10(Emphasisadded.) As Myers et al., had initially advanced, the early to mid-1970s Big Bang originof HIV/AIDS is further supported by most recent scientific evidence.10As if repeating false assumptions would alter historic and scientific facts, manycontemporary investigators, like those representing AIs HIV/AIDS Task Force, continueto imply the SIV to HIV zoonosis occurred on or before 1959. Many natural evolutiontheory evangelists continue to cite the now disproven cut hunter theory to explain theorigin of the pandemic.8,22Reflecting on Zhu et als position, however, they simplyconcluded that the major-group viruses that dominate the global AIDS pandemic at

present shared a common ancestor in the 1940s or the early 1950s. However, givenconfounding factors, including the likelihood of viral gene recombination during themanufacture and testing of the HB vaccine, like Korber et al.s speculation discussed inthe next section, the 1959 isolate may hold little, if any, relevance in determining theorigin of HIV/AIDS.10Suffice it to say, no one has ever found a virus predating the SVCP and the late1970s.11At best they found fragments of what may have been the complete virus, butmore likely pieces of a progenitor virus they called a common ancestor that dated backto the 1940s or the early 1950s. These and other portions of this common ancestormay have existed for centuries if not millennia. Again, this evidence is rrelevant whenconsidering the 1970s punctuated [iatrogenic] event recently determined to beundisputable scientific fact.More importantly, as Zhu and Ho et al., concluded, the role of large-scale vaccinationcampaigns, perhaps with multiple uses of non-sterilized needles, should be carefullyexamined, . . . as contributing to the sudden emergence of HIV/AIDS in North Americaand Africa simultaneously during the late 1970s.9,11The 1931 AIDS Origin Assumption and Viral RecombinationRegarding the 1931 estimated date of HIVs origin advanced by Korber et al.7(i.e.,

somewhere between 1910 and 1950), a critical examination of these authors methodsreveals problems. Largely speculative due to their use of a confounding-factor-liablecomputer model, Korber and colleagues noted their limitations. They stated theirfinding(s) regarding the 1931 genetic projection, that precludes various vaccine-inducedpandemic theories, might be wrong if viral recombination(s) had occurred. They most

certainly did in the evolutionary process of SIV to HIV according to most cientists.10,13Yet, despite these facts, iatrogenic theory opponents who have secured a gross burdenof proof advantage in the AIDS origin debate,20repeatedly reference this groups work,along with the frequently misrepresented work of Zhu, et al.9concerning the 1959sequence discovery.22

Again, the punctuated origin of HIV/AIDS determined by Myers et al., can only explainthe nearly simultaneous emergence of ten separate, though related, AIDS epidemics inAfrica during the early 1970s, that were well established by 1976.10Lending further credence to the theory that early hepatitis B vaccine trials provided the

punctuated event, Korber et al wrote of anticipated errors in their 1931 determinationusing linear or recombinant evolutionary models due to unnatural or iatrogenic eventsinciting viral recombination. They wrote , If there was a concentration of suchrecombinants during just one period of sampling, the effect on the timing estimate wouldbe unpredictable.7
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#8http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#8http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#11http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#22http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#8http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10


5/13

Thus, if the punctuated origin event advanced by Myers et al,10had been the passageof HB virus from polio vaccinated humans to chimpanzees then back to humans, with the

additional risk of recombination from pooling hundreds of infected serum samples priorto additional viral recombinant transfers via the HB vaccines given to human subjects inNew York City and sub-Saharan Africa, then this might best explain the origin ofHIV/AIDS and render Korber et als 1931 projection inconsequential. As detailed in the

next section, this is precisely the thesis advanced by Horowitz.2,13

In summary, the determinations reached by Korber et al.,7and Ho et al.,9of possibledates for the origin of HIV-1, 1931 and 1959 respectively, have been adequately clarifiedelsewhere.10The authors themselves acknowledge, the super-computer-based studycannot tell whether this hypothetical 1930 virus was in humans or animals and so do notshow when zoonosis occurred.7,10Myers et al. further qualified: If PIV [primate immunodeficiency virus] was in humans inthe first half of the 20th century, it may be estimated, given the assumptions of thelook-back analysis, that the ancestral HIV-1 group M virus arose at 1930 plus or minus20 years. Conversely, if PIV was not in humans in the first half of the 20th century,then the Korber et al analysis holds little, if any, value in-so-far-as determining a date ororigin of the HIVs and AIDS.7,10The Earliest Hepatitis B Vaccines and The Origin of AIDSIf early polio vaccines had not triggered the origin of HIV/AIDS as scientific consensusnow holds,6then some other, chimpanzee-related, iatrogenic event must be availableto explain the staggering array of deadly recombinants that were proven by Myers et al

to have arisen virtually simultaneously during the early to mid-1970s.10,21In thisregard, even more neglected, and perhaps more relevant than the OPV theory of AIDS,is the hepatitis B (HB) vaccine hypothesis.2,13,23According to scientific records,2African chimpanzees were used in the manufacture of

the HB vaccines during the early 1970s. Additional documents prove that human HBviruses cultured in vivo in chimpanzees were returned to humans whose infected bloodserum was then pooled to develop four different strains of experimental HB vaccine pilottested between 1970 and 1975 in New York City and central Africa. This HB vaccine

theory of HIV zoonosis proposes that endogenous, or more likely exogenous, progenitorviruses were activated24when serially transmitted from humans to chimpanzees, thenback to humans. Subsequently, pooled blood serum containing HB surface antigenand/or live virions, a milieu ripe for viral recombination, was used to develop the four

suspected vaccines administered to New Yorks gay population and simultaneously tosub-Saharan Africans. Besides the phylogenetic evidence cited above, epidemiologicalevidence also supports this HB vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS origination.

Figure 1 is derived from Higginson and Muirs report on cancer studies conducted by theInternational Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC) in collaboration with the NationalCancer Institute (NCI).25Figure 2 derives from this data superimposed on a map ofHIV-1 seroprevalence in Africa reported by the U.S. Department of Commerce in apublication discussing desirable depopulation associated with HIV/AIDS.26Additional

evidence here was supplied in the chronology of the early hepatitis B vaccine trialscompiled by Goodfield.27The two maps, juxaposed, show a striking correlation betweenhepatitis B vaccine and liver cancer experiments conducted in Africa during the early1970s, and the countries in central and southern Africa with the high est HIV-1

seroprevalence rates by 1994. The black squares indicate areas participating in the HBcancer virus research and vaccine trials.
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#21http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#21http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#23http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#23http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#23http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#24http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#24http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#25http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#25http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#25http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#26http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#26http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#26http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#27http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#27http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#27http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#27http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#26http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#25http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#24http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#23http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#21http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#9http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#7http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10


6/13

It should also be noted that Mozambique has one of the highest rates of HIV-2, whichwas allegedly discovered by Essex et al.,28in Senegalese female prostitutes years after

the African hepatitis B vaccination pilot studies began. Due to their state-authorizedemployment and high risk for infection, Senegalese female prostitutes were required toreceive hepatitis B vaccinations for relicensure. That Essex et al. found SIVagm, adocumented vaccine contaminant, in the blood of these human subject, is additionally

compelling evidence in support of the HB vaccine AIDS origination theory.29In brief, a well documented, theoretically viable, and generally neglected evolutionaryroute of SIVagm to HIV-1 zoonosis sequentially involves:1) Polio vaccine recipientsworldwide, including gay men in New York, and Blacks in Central Africa, were exposed tosimian viruses including SV40, SFR (Simian Foamy Retroviruses containing reverse

transcriptase), SIVagm, and perhaps others from the mid-1950s, through at least the1960s;2,4 2) Between 1965 and 1970, researchers in NYC isolated and then inoculatedthe MS-2 strain of HB virus into the above cited New York and African HB vaccine study

volunteers.2,303) Human derived HB viruses, and potentially activated retroviralsequences, were then transferred to chimpanzees, then back again to humans in NYCand central Africa during the development and testing of four genetically altered

subtypes of the pre-1975 experimental HB vaccine.32,33HIV-1 progenitorcontamination, recombination, and/or transmission risks were likely increased during thisprocess by: a) human incubation for more than a decade of polio vaccine contaminantsand recombinants including SV40, SFR, and possibly SIVagm; b) the pooling of infectedblood serum donated by hundreds of gay American and Black African polio vaccine

recipients who had subsequently received injections with chimpanzee cultured strains ofHB virus; c) the biohazardous laboratory conditions and viral containment problemsreported by the HB vaccine investigators and their affiliates; and finally5) The four

pooled serum-derived HB vaccines that were administered to thousands of test subjectsby 1975, primarily gay males in NYC and central African Blacks. This series of eventsprovides the best explanation for an early to mid-1970s punctuated origin event mostprecisely fitting the etiological determinations of the HIV-1/AIDS pandemic.10

Again, it should be noted that the African volunteers inhabited a geographic areaconsistent with the highest rates of HIV-1 seroprevalence. Among the nations whererates are highest, HB studies were conducted in: Senegal, Cote dIvoire, Uganda, Kenya,Swaziland, and the northeastern part of South Africa. According to circumstantialevidence, eastern Zaire bordering the West Nile region of northwest Uganda also hostedsuch trials.2,25-27Historic Precedence for the HB Vaccine HypothesisThere is historic precedence for this precise HB thesis. According to Beale, the risk of HBviruses contaminating human blood serum and subsequent vaccinations was determined

as early as 1942. Then, more than 62 deaths and 28,500 cases resulted from serum HBcontaminated yellow fever vaccines.31

According to Hilleman, early yellow fever vaccines also delivered leukemic retroviruses to

human populations due to caged animal and laboratory contaminations and concomitantvaccine transmissions.13

Dr. Hilleman additionally reinforced this punctuated origin thesis by describing the riskshe encountered by importing contaminated African sub-human primates for vaccineresearch and development at the Merck pharmaceutical company. Between the late

1950s through the 1970s, Dr. Hilleman told Harvard medical historian Edward Shorter in1987, I brought African greens in. I didnt know we were importing AIDS virus at the

time.13
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#28http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#28http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#28http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#29http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#29http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#29http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#1http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#1http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#1http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#30http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#30http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#32http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#32http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#5http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#5http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#5http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#25http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#25http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#27http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#27http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#27http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#31http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#31http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#31http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#31http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#27http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#25http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#5http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#32http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#30http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#1http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#29http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#28


7/13

Given these statements of fact, it is reasonable to suggest, as stated above, the earliestHB vaccine pilot studies may have activated an endogenous or exogenous HIV-related

retroviral gene in one or more of the primates,24fulfilling the starburst phylogenyantecedents advanced by Myers et al.10

During the Royal Societys symposium on the origin of AIDS, Hoopers 1950s OPV/AIDShypothesis was largely rebuked because he failed to establish the use of chimpanzees bythe Wistar Institute in the production of the suspected OPV.18Moreover, this vaccine

was not given selectively to New Yorks gay male population. Curiously, Mercks early1970s hepatitis B vaccine trials that did involve gay men in NYC, and Blacks in centralAfrica, partially prepared in Litton Bionetics (LB) exported/Merck imported Africanchimpanzees, ironically went without mention.Burden of Proof and the Origin of AIDS

The most vocal opponent of the OPV and HB vaccine theories of HIV/AIDS origination isDr. John Moore, affiliated with Rockefeller Universitys Aaron Diamond Research Centerin New York.As reported in Medical Hypothesis, following a presentation advancing the HB vaccinetheory of HIV/AIDS at the XI International Conference on AIDS, in 1996, Dr. Mooreflippantly rebuked this thesis in the Canadian press. A few years later, he did the same

regarding the Edward Hoopers book, The River, which he alleged was historicallyinaccurate, potentially damaging to the publics trust in western medicine, and harmfulto his colleagues efforts to make AIDS vaccines for use in Africa.2When this author personally contacted Dr . Moore in an effort to begin scientificdiscourse following his Canadian press interview, Moore refused any formal discussion.

Responding later to prodding, he wrote me from the Aaron Diamond AIDS ResearchCenter saying, I explicity denied you an interview when you requested one. . . . I saidto you that I had no interest in your . . . grotesque theories . . . For the record, I knowwhat your views are, and I reject them. Indeed, I dismiss them as uninteresting,incorrect and downright stupid. In the Vancouver Sun, Moore was further quoted assaying, HIV is transmitted from monkeys to humans. I dont think theres any doubtabout that. Its hard scientific reality. In fact, according to scientific consensus, thedefining zoonosis for the origin of HIV occurred between chimpanzees and humans, notmonkeys.2It should be noted that Dr. Moores institutional benefactors include the Rockefellerfamily which, along with the Rockefeller Foundation and its institutional affiliatetheSloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Center in New Yorkhas heavily invested in

viral cancer research, vaccine developments, propaganda programs, population controlefforts, and the Merck pharmaceutical company in particular. Thus, Moores bias isstrongly suggested.2,13,14Worse yet, history shows that soon after Dr. Gallos alleged discovery of the AIDS virusin 1984, Dr. Moore co-directed the only official effort to examine Mercks HB vaccine for

fear of possible AIDS transmission.23His principle co-investigator was Dr. B.J. Poieszat the State University of New York. Dr. Poiesz, their paper noted, had worked closelywith Dr. Gallo in isolating the type-C cancer virus associated with lymphomas duringthe mid to late-1970s. Their group of researchers included anonymous CDC authorswho, for unspecified reasons, omitted the centrally important New York City and AfricanHB vaccine recipients from their analysis. Adding insult to this injury, the teamsconclusions were entirely inconsistent with earlier epidemiologicaldeterminations and serological measures.13
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#24http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#24http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#24http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#18http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#18http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#18http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#14http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#14http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#14http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#23http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#23http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#23http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#23http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#14http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#18http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#24


8/13

Reinforcing the observance of such political bias and tainted science in this field ofinquiry is the conclusion reached by several featured speakers at the Royal Societysmeeting in London. They addressed the burden of proof required of iatrogenic versusnatural AIDS origin theorists.10,19,20These experts protested the unfair unscientificadvantage that has been historically given to outspoken natural evolution theorists, suchas Dr. Moore, who have been curiously exempt from having to substantiate their

obviously flawed claims and hypotheses. Ironically, despite this, their unprovenmisguided theories remain widely accepted as supposed fact.10,19,20

The only remedy such deception is updated knowledge regarding the advanced geneticanalyses that have seriously undermined arguments for isolated viral leaps that cannotadequately explain the source of AIDS and the sunburst phylogeny of HIVs earliestAfrican strains.10In the wake of the Royal Societys symposium, theories that nowappear tenuous, if not ludicrous, include isolated parenteral (i.e., skin piercing) injuries(e.g., the cut hunter theory), nutritional exposures, population movements, andclimatic variations that are alleged to have led to isolated zoonotic events followed yearslater, evolutionarily, by the spreading plague. Alternatively, many participants at theconference concluded that the transfer of SIV to human beings was probably connected

with unprecedented medical activity in Africa in the 20th century.21

Bionetics Evidence to be ReconciledWhat continues inadequately reported in the scientific literature, perhaps because

researchers remain unaware, or because most investigators would certainly feelthreatened by such disconcerting revelations, was that the precise scenario advanced byMyers et al.,10to best account for the sunburst phylogeny and punctuated origin eventwas repeatedly engineered and studied during the Litton Bionetics (LB) administered

SVCP, at precisely the time (1969-1974) required to produce the Big Bang, as Myersoriginally called it. At this same time, LBs study of HB viral co-infections with virusescurrently linked to HIV-related immune suppression and AIDS symptomatology was

ongoing, as you will read below. This information comes directly from their contracttitled, Investigations of Viral Carcinogenesis in Primates (NIH Grant Number 71-2025beginning February 12, 1962). This team, officiated by NCI Project Officer Dr. RobertGallo, the subsequent discoverer of HTLV-1,2(leukemia viruses) and HIV-1 (the AIDSvirus) almost 15 years later, stated:

During the past year [1970] macaques were inoculated at birth or in utero with theMason-Pfizer monkey mammary virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Herpesvirus saimiri, andMareks disease virus. EB virus was given with immunostimulation andimmunosuppression (ALS, prednisone, imuran). Australian antigen [HB virus] was givento newborn African green monkeys.Might this quoted knowledge have impacted Dr. Gallos earliest declaration that theorigin of HIV-1 came from African greens (i.e., SIVagm), and/or Dr. Hillemansconfession that he brought the AIDS virus into North America in African greens?

Furthermore, it is well known that HIV-2 sources from macaque monkeys from this sametime period.8Might this specific multiply-infected simian colony be the source of the

original SIV to HIV zoonosis? There is much evidence to suggest this, and it is certainlyworthy of an official inquiry.It is also curious that EBV was of major interest to the LB team of researchers.It is also well known that EBV is a potent co-carcinogen with HIV-1 and deadly co-factorin the development of AIDS.
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#21http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#21http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#21http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#8http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#8http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#8http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#8http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#21http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#20http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#10


9/13

This 1971 report by Landon, Ting and Gallo et al., referenced the use of colony-bornprimates observed for seroconversion to EB positive immune suppressive statuspredisposing the animals for retroviral infections and cancers. To summarize this work,conducted almost a decade before Dr. Gallo discovered the first leukemia retrovirus(HTLV-I), and later HIV-1, his Bionetics coworkers disclosed that their:

[B]reeding and holding colonies were surveyed for antibody to EBV. All breeders werepositive and their offspring contain maternal antibody for several months. . . .

[Moreover,] An RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, [the primary AIDS-linked enzyme]similar to that associated with RNA tumor viruses, was detected in human leukemic cellsbut not in normal cells stimulated by phytohemagglutinin. The enzyme was isolated,purified and concentrated 200-fold, making possible its further characterization andstudy in relation to the leukemic process in man.33This document, and statement alone, considering its date, should be adequate impetusfor an independent investigation into the SVCP with regard to the origin of AIDS.Reflecting on the specific scenario advanced by Myers and co-workers regarding thephylogenetic, recombinant, and immunosuppressive correlates and antecedents of the

starburst that reflects at least ten simultaneous HIV/AIDS African outbreaks, theBionetics investigators stated the significance and proposed course of their vaccineresearch involving chimpanzees. They wrote:

Significance to Biomedical Research and to the [Special Virus Cancer] Program of the[National Cancer] Institute: Inasmuch as tests for the biological activity of candidatehuman [cancer] viruses will not be tested in the human species, it is imperative that

another system be developed for these determinations and, subsequently for theevaluation of vaccines or other measures of control. The close phylogenetic relationshipof the lower primates [i.e., chimpanzees] to man justifies utilization of these animals forthese purposes. Further study of altered transfer RNA and polymerase enzymes woulddetermine their significance in neoplastic change and provide a basis for selection oftherapeutic agents.

Proposed Course: Continuation with increased emphasis on monitoring and intensivecare of inoculated animals to determine if active infection occurs, effects of infection, and

degree of immunosuppression when used. Further studies of human neoplasms at amolecular level will continue.33Inasmuch as humans were not being directly infected with candidate viruses duringthis program according to the contract summary, live viral vaccines derived fromretroviruses similar to the HIVs were being prepared and tested in primate populationsthat apparently included humans as well as chimpanzees. This at the precise time thatthe Australian antigenthe HB highly infectious and easily transmissible cancer virusand related HB vaccines were being injected into both chimpanzees and humans in NewYork and Sub-Saharan Africa by LB collaborators.33

At the XI International Conference on AIDS in 1996, when questioned regarding his

involvement in these Bionetics studies, Dr. Gallo angrily replied to this author, Quitefrankly, I dont know what the hell youre talking about.13If the HB vaccine theorymight be the focus of a reputable independent inquiry, such as the one urged by

Cribb,19and now AI members, Dr. Gallo might be obliged to formally discuss hiscontract with Bionetics wherein the Australian antigen was given to newborn Africangreen monkeys in the context of testing a swarm of [candidate viral and retroviral]variants. If he still contends this HB vaccine/origin of AIDS theory has no merit, as heargued forcefully at that time, then perhaps he would be willing to publish an alternativeaccount reflecting more recent scientific revelations.
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#33


10/13


11/13

with the proposed AI investigation of the SVCP, but he did not rule out the possibilitythat HIV was released intentionally.4As Weiss stated, theories involving the CIA in the origin of AIDS have gained wideacceptance.6Investigations by Horowitz et al.2,3,13focused on the CIA and the 1969appropriations hearings in which the NASNRC was credited as the source of technicalexpertise for the U.S. Armys development of AIDS-like viruses. At that time, biologicalweapons were of great interest to Nelson Rockefellers protg, and Nixon administrationNational Seurity Advisor (NSA), Dr. Henry Kissinger. According to his biographer, andtwo previous CIA directorsWilliam Colby and Richard HelmsKissinger oversaw theCIAs top secret biological weapons program called MK:NAOMI. Soon after becomingNSA, he ordered a review of such weapons capabilities.13-15

Furthermore, in the early 1970s, in keeping with U.S. Government and global

industrialists initiatives reflecting Rockefeller-directed Population Council urgings forThird World depopulation, Kissinger requested and received National Special SecurityMemorandum 200 articulating the urgency of dramatically reducing Africanpopulations.16At that time Kissinger and associates were leading advisors to the Merck

pharmaceutical company whose president, George W. Merck, was Americas biologicalweapons industry director, as he had been since World War II.17

According to Hooper, the genocidal hypothesis of HIV/AIDS should be taken with a grainof salt.4It is clear, however, that compelling evidence exits, albeit circumstantial, thatU.S. Government officials, including Henry Kissinger, may have had something to dowith the initial HIV/AIDS outbreak. At the precise time corresponding to the earliesttransmissions of HIV/AIDS, Kissinger directed a national security cryptocracy thatincluded corporate affiliates at the biological weapons contractor /vaccine maker Merck,

as well as the traditional weapons contractor Litton Industries. Littons president, RoyAsh, also served in the Nixon administration overseeing American industry. Littonsmedical subsidiary, Bionetics, as detailed above, largely directed the NCIs SVCP,

administered Americas premier biological weapons testing center at Fort Detrick,Maryland, and supplied the chimpanzees, monkeys, monkey viruses, primate cell lines,and other resources for cancer research, biological weapons development, andvaccine manufacture.

Thus, Kissinger certainly maintained the means, through his official channels at Merck,

Litton Bionetics, and the CIA, as well as the motive, to deploy AIDS-like viruses by 1974in Mercks HB vaccine. What is unconscionable to most people, Kissinger, a staunchadvocate of African depopulation, would have considered it convenient that theemergence of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa coincided synchronously with the massivedepopulation policy institutionalized with primary funding from the RockefellerFoundation and the Merck Fund.2,3,13,14

Most recently, Kissingers direction of foreign genocidal operations has been heralded byeven mainstream periodicals.36In light of these revelations, it is stunning that Kissingerwrote his own genocide indemnification policy on behalf of the United StatesGovernment in Foreign Affairs published by the Council on Foreign Relations in 2001.37The Challenge Before Us

There is a crisis of public faith in science and scientists, stated Dr. Julian Cribb,referring to the contentious manner in which origin of HIV/AIDS research and debate hasbeen conducted thus far. What I have described is . . . a systematic endeavour tosuppress public discussion and scientific inquiry into this important [vaccine] hypothesisand to discredit its proponents over more than 12 years.
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#15http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#15http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#15http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#16http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#16http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#16http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#17http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#17http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#17http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#14http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#14http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#14http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#36http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#36http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#36http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#37http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#37http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#37http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#37http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#36http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#14http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#17http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#16http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#15http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#13http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#6http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4


12/13

He summarized before the esteemed Royal Society gathering. Unless scientists areprepared to go into this issue objectively and transparently, it will damage the standingof science in the eyes of the community.19Determining the origin of HIV/AIDS is vital for the following reasons according to Cribb:1) to prevent similar calamities in the future;2) to discover remedial methods andmaterials that might evolve from such knowledge;3) to improve safety standards inviral laboratories and vaccine production facilities based on the knowledge of the

pandemics origin; and4) to restore faith and trust in this area of science and medicine.19Furthermore, Cribb argued, If AIDS is iatrogenic, through an honest mistake, sciencemay be forgiven. But if it seeks to bury the idea, first, it will fail and second, it willdestroy public trust. To the extent that the HB vaccine theory of AIDS is officiallyneglected, as Hamilton foretold: This hypothesis is certainly not going to go away.19But if the HB vaccine theory on the origin of AIDS, as current science overwhelminglysupports and the process of elimination has virtually proven, is ultimately accepted,then Cribbs forgivable honest mistake conjecture might need to be reexaminedagainst more unnerving possibilities.

At the time of this writing, the U.S. Homeland Security Act passed the Senate virtually

unanimously. Mysteriously incorporated in its text was a vaccine injury indemnity clausethat freed drug companies from liabilities associated with specific vaccine ingredients,such as HIV precursors in the HB vaccines. With this gross violation of U.S.constitutional, civil, and human rights, hundreds of thousands of Americans have been

forced to care, without compensation, for vaccine injured family members. If the U.S.Government is able to get away with this most blatant breach of public faith, what is itcapable of doing covertly? Clearly, this current vaccine policy is a form ofinstitutionalized genocidedefined as the mass enslaving (pharmaceutically andotherwise) and killing of people for economics, politics, and/or ideology?

So long as the above scientific facts and AIDS issues remain unaddressed by medicinesmainstream, the implications are that AIDS science and vaccination policies, and likelyall of science, has evolved in a vacuum devoid of ethics to serve political, economic,

and/or ideological motives. Thus, by strict definition, genocide and iatrogenesis havemuch. So much so that regardless of whether HIV/AIDS originated by accident orintentionally, with this data, there is sufficient justification to coin a new mostappropriate termiatrogenocide.Further research to test this hypothesis should include: retrospective epidemiologicalstudies of homosexual populations in New York reported to have received the earliest HBvaccines; serological studies of any stored blood and/or serum from these early HBvaccine study subjects; likewise for the chimpanzees used in the preliminary trials

and/or vaccine manufacture; and genetic analyses of viral components in samples of thevaccine lots used during these earliest HB vaccine trials (if still available).About the AuthorLeonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., is an internationally known authority in theoverlapping fields of public health, behavioral science, emerging diseases, andbioterrorism. He received his doctorate in medical dentistry from Tufts University Schoolof Dental Medicine in 1977, was awarded a post-doctoral fellowship in behavioral scienceat the University of Rochester, earned a Master of Public Health degree from HarvardUniversity, and another Master of Arts degree in health education from Beacon College,all before joining the research faculty at Harvard. Dr. Horowitz is best known for his
http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#4http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#3http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#2http://originofaids.com/articles/early.htm#19


13/13

national bestselling book, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & EbolaNature, Accident orIntentional?(Tetrahedron Press, 1998; 1-888-508-4787)which recently resulted in the United Stated General Accounting Office investigating theman-made origin of AIDS theory. (See: http://www.healingcelebrations.com/gao.htm)Dr. Horowitzs brilliant work in the field of vaccination risk awareness has prompted atleast three Third World nations to change their vaccination policies. His recent stunningtestimony before the United States Congress Government Reform Committee, literallybrought the hearing to a halt. (See:http://www.healingcelebrations.com) Dr. Horowitzquestioned government health officials regarding a Centers for Disease Control andPrevention (CDC) secreted report showing a definitive link between the mercuryingredient (i.e., thimerosal), common to most vaccinations, and the skyrocketing ratesof autism and behavioral disorders affecting our children and the future our nation.Incredibly, Dr. Horowitz alerted the FBI, in writing and in person, one week before thefirst anthrax mailing was announced in the press, that a major anthrax fright was inthe process of unfolding that demanded the FBIs urgent attention. Needless to say theydid not heed Dr. Horowitzs prophetic warning.

Moreover, three months before the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and

Pentagon, Dr. Horowitz released his thirteenth book, prophetically titled Death in the Air:Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare. The book focuses on the West Nile Virus as anact of bioterroism, and considers what and who is really behind this and other recent

outbreaks. Dr. Horowitz argues that his disclosures expose the roots of global terrorism,along with the individuals and organizations at the heart of what he calls thepetrochemicalpharmaceutical cartel. He believes this multi-national corporate beastis in the process of committing global genocide, profiting from engineered frights, and atthe same time, most efficiently culling targeted populations considered excessive.Very recently, you may have heard that Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Chairman of theSenate Judiciary Committee, called for an investigation into the links between the recentWest Nile Virus outbreaks and bioterrrorism. Dr. Horowitz is the principle pioneer andinvestigator of this theory.
http://www.healingcelebrations.com/Disease%20Deities%20on%20Capitol%20Hill%20Address%20Autism.htmhttp://www.healingcelebrations.com/Disease%20Deities%20on%20Capitol%20Hill%20Address%20Autism.htmhttp://www.healingcelebrations.com/Disease%20Deities%20on%20Capitol%20Hill%20Address%20Autism.htmhttp://www.healingcelebrations.com/Disease%20Deities%20on%20Capitol%20Hill%20Address%20Autism.htm

Origin of Aids Disease

Documents

Transcript of Origin of Aids Disease