Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
-
Upload
alvin-khoo -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
1/24
UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD, U.K.
&
MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE
DIPLOMA IN BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
Lecturer: MS TRICIA ANG
ASSIGNMENT DONE BY
NAME : Khoo Eng Tze, AlvinNRIC : S8625925GBatch No : DBMEM 0965BMOBILE : 9026 1377
1 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
2/24
CONTENTS
Introduction ..
3
Definitions of Personality .
4
Determinants of Personality ..
6
Environmental Factors ...
7
Locus of control .......8
Self Esteem Test .....
10
Type A or B Personality Test 11
Implicit Personality Theory .
14
Personality Difference
15
The Four Personalities
17
Personality Strengths and Weaknesses ..
18
References .
2 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
3/24
22
Internet Sites ..
23
3 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
4/24
Question 2: What is Personality? Discuss the determinants of
personality. Describe your personality by using any four personality type
instruments.
Introduction
What is Personality?
Personality Each individual brings to an organization a different personality a
unique combination of personal skills and abilities that contributes to successful
job performance.
Workers experience their work environments from their own particular
perspectives. They bring their personal expectations to their jobs presume that
these jobs will provide them something they value. Employees do not like to do
the same things, nor do they all see the same things as being important.
Along with personal characteristics of individual workers comes a set of
corresponding behaviours. For instance, an entry-level accountant who viewsusing spreadsheet applications as tedious and boring and wishes to do
something else may lack commitment to that particular job. As a result, he or she
may come to work late, frequently call in sick, or even quit. But another
accountant who likes to work with spreadsheets and sees the job as a stepping
stone to a business manager position may flourish. Research has shown that
unless individuals are working in a job that gives them the opportunity to develop
a positive self-concept and do the things they think are important, their success
may be limited. (See K. Onstad, December 1995. J. Aley, February 5, 1996)
Personality is the supreme realization of the innate idiosyncrasy of a living being.
It is an act of high courage flung in the face of life, the absolute affirmation of all
that constitutes the individual, the most successful adaptation to the universal
4 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
5/24
condition of existence coupled with the greatest possible freedom for self-
determination. (Carl Gustav Jung, 1934)
Definition of Personality
Lay usage of the term "personality"
We use the term personality frequently but what does it actually mean?
She has a wonderful personality.
He has no personality.
He has personality plus.
We seem to have a personality conflict.
Its just her personality.
She has her mothers personality.
Hes a real personality.
Personality comes from the Greek word "persona", meaning "mask"
The word personality derives from the Latin word persona which means mask.
The study of personality can be understood as the study of masks that people
wear. These are the personas that people project and display, but also includesthe inner parts of psychological experience which we collectively call our self.
"I" is for personality
According to Adams (1954, cited in Schultz & Schultz, 1994) personality is I.
Adams suggested that we get a good idea of what personality is by listening to
what we say when we use "I". When you say I, you are, in effect, summing up
everything about yourself - your likes and dislikes, fears and virtues, strengths
and weaknesses.
The word I is what defined you as an individual, as a person separate from all
others. (Schultz & Schultz, 1994, p.8)
5 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
6/24
Various definitions of personality
"Deceptive masquerade or mimicry."
"The entire organization of a human being at any stage of development."
"Levels or layers of dispositions, usually with a unifying or integrative
principle at the top."
"The integration of those systems or habits that represent an individuals
characteristic adjustments to the environment."
"The way in which the person does such things as remembering, thinking
or loving."
"Those characteristics that account for consistent patterns of behaviour"
"Personality is not an existing substantive entity to be searched for but a
complex construct to be developed and defined by the observer."
(Smith & Vetter, 1982, p.5)
A contemporary definition for personality is offered by Carver and Scheier
(2000, p.5): Personality is a dynamic organization, inside the person, of
psychophysical systems that create a persons characteristic patterns of
behavior, thoughts, and feelings. Carver & Scheier (2000, p.5)
o Dynamic Organization: suggests ongoing readjustments,
adaptation to experience, continual upgrading and maintaining
Personality doesnt just lie there. It has process and its organized.
o Inside the Person: suggests internal storage of patterns, supporting
the notion that personality influences behaviours, etc.
o Psychophysical systems: suggests that the physical is also involved
in who we are
Characteristic Patterns: implies that consistency/continuity which
are uniquely identifying of an individual
6 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
7/24
o Behaviour, Thoughts, and Feelings: indicates that personality
includes a wide range of psychological experience/manifestation:
that personality is displayed in MANY ways.
Carver & Scheier (2000, p.5) suggest that the word personality conveys a
sense of consistency, internal causality, and personal distinctiveness.
This issue of personal distinctiveness is very important. There are certain
universal characteristics of the human race and particular features of
individuals. We all for example experience stress and the elevated cortical
that goes with it, and we all suffer the immune suppressive effects thereof.
But each of us is unique too.
Determinants of Personality
Personality is the outcome of a continuous personal quality development
process. The role of personality becomes clear in a particular situation.
Personality is recognised in a situation. It is the result of personal quality
interaction in a particular condition. The major determinants of personality of an
individual are given below:
Biological Factors
Heredity: Heredity refers to those factors that were determined at conception.
Physical stature, facial attractiveness, sex, temperament, muscle composition
and reflexes, energy level, and biological rhythms are characteristics that are
generally considered to be either completely or substantially influenced by who
your parents were; that is, by their biological, physiological, and inherent
psychological makeup. The contribution of heredity to personality development is
vividly clear for developing external appearance, behaviour, social stimuli, self
inner awareness, organising traits, etc.
7 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
8/24
Brain: Brain has a great impact on personality. The psychologists are unable to
prove empirically the contribution of human brain in influencing personality.
Father and children generally adopt the same type of brain stimulation. The
differences are caused by environment. Electrical stimulation of brain (ESB) and
split brain psychology (SBP) are the outcome of genetic transmission. They are
helpful in moulding employee's behaviour. ESB is used for motivating employees
towards better performances. Managers are trained to use SBP for mobilising
employees for proper behaviour.
Physical Features: Perhaps the most outstanding factor that contributes to
personality is the physical stature of an individual. An individual's external
appearance is proved to be having a tremendous effect on personality. For
example, the fact that a person is short or tall, fat or thin, handsome or ugly,
black or whitish will undoubtedly influence the person's effect on others and in
turn will affect the self-concept. A person's physical characteristics may be
related to his approach to the social environment, to the expectancies of others,
and to their reactions, to him. These in turn may have impact on personality
development.
Environmental Factors
Cultural Factors: The accepted norms of social behaviour are known as culture.
Culture was traditionally considered as the major determinant of an individual's
personality. The way in which people behave with others and the driving force of
such functions are considered significant components of culture. The ideology of
the culture is imitated by the following generations. The personality attributes of
independence, aggression, competition and cooperation are the outcomes of
cultural interaction.
8 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
9/24
Religion: Religion plays a significant role in shaping one's personality. Hindus
have different personalities from those of Sikhs and Muslims. Children in Hindu
societies learn from the very beginning about hard work and god-fearing
attitudes. Christians are open, independent and cooperative.
Family: Children learn from their parents, sisters and brothers. Family is the first
factor affecting personality development, after hereditary characteristics are
endowed. Rich people have different personalities from those of poor. Children
nurtured under a warm, loving environment are positive and active as compared
to children neglected by their parents.
Parental Influences: The positive and negative personalities of children are
dependent on their parents characteristics and mutual behaviour. Children
develop negative personalities if their parents don't have good relationship.
Proper parental guidance to children makes them active and efficient.
Situation Factors
Situation further influences the effects of heredity and environment onpersonality. An individual's personality, while generally stable and consistent,
does change in different situations. Different demands in different situations call
forth different aspects of one's personality.
It has been observed that many arrogant and indiscipline employees become
humble and disciplined in a particular situation. Those having a criminal
background may become powerful and strong administrators, dominant
politicians, etc.
9 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
10/24
Locus of control
Locus of control is a personality construct referring to an individual's perception
of the locus of events as determined internally by his/her own behavior vs. fate,
luck, or external circumstances.
Some research (McCombs, 1991) suggests that what underlies the internal locus
of control is the concept of "self as agent." This means that our thoughts control
our actions and that when we realize this executive function of thinking we can
positively affect our beliefs, motivation, and academic performance. "The self as
agent can consciously or unconsciously direct, select, and regulate the use of all
knowledge structures and intellectual processes in support of personal goals,
intentions, and choices" (p. 6). McCombs asserts that "the degree to which one
chooses to be self-determining is a function of one's realization of the source of
agency and personal control" (p. 7). In other words, we can say to ourselves, "I
choose to direct my thoughts and energies toward accomplishment. I choose not
to be daunted by my anxieties or feelings of inadequacy. (McCombs, B., 1991).
10 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
11/24
Self Esteem Test
This self esteem test is quick and simple, answer TRUE or FALSE to each
question (if you cannot answer 100% TRUE then answer FALSE - check below
how to score):
1. Other people are not better off or more fortunate than me.
2. I accept myself as I am and am happy with myself.
3. I enjoy socializing.
4. I deserve love and respect.
5. I feel valued and needed.
6. I don't need others to tell me I have done a good job.
7. Being myself is important.
8. I make friends easily.
9. I can accept criticism without feeling put down.
10. I admit my mistakes openly.
11. I never hide my true feelings.
12. I always speak up for myself and put my views across.
13. I am a happy, carefree person.
14. I don't worry what others think of my views.15. I don't need others' approval to feel good.
16. I don't feel guilty about doing or saying what I want.
TEST SCORE: Total number of TRUE answers you gave, EACH ONE POINT:
11 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
12/24
15 - 16 Points - You have a high level of self esteem!
12 - 14 Points - Not bad but room for you to improve
8 - 11 Points - Low self esteem is holding you back
Below 8 Points - Your esteem is drastically low!
Type A vs Type B Personality Test
Type A Type B
Hyper active Easy going
Short tempered Calm
Impatient Patient
Always pressurized Hardly stressed
Aggressive Complaisant
Competitive Reflective
Very ambitious Do not mind losing
Personality Test
1. When facing an unfamiliar problem, what do you usually do?
o Address the problem immediately.
o Think about what to do and then take action.
o Sit back and let things work out for themselves.
2. If you have to wait for someone or something for about thirty minutes,
what do you do?
o Keep checking the watch.
12 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
13/24
o Get impatient and somewhat angry.
o Do not mind; spend your time looking around.
3. Someone does something nice for you. How do you react? What are your
immediate thoughts?
o You wonder what it is that they want.
o You feel a little uncomfortable but definitely appreciate the gesture.
o You think it's very kind of them and go out of your way to return the
favour.
4. What is a normal day in your life like?
o Full of problems.
o A mixture of problems and fun.
o There are never enough things to keep me busy.
5. There is something good in every person, you think of this statement as:
o Over-rated.
o Yes, because you have experienced it.
o Absolutely true.
6. Do you often finish other people's sentences because they speak too
slowly?
o Yes, frequently
o Yes, sometimes
o No, never
13 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
14/24
7. What do you think of praising others?
o Shouldn't praise, as praise makes people proud and lazy.
o Should praise sometimes.
o Should always be praised, as it helps boost their performance.
8. Do you keep a daily schedule plan?
o Yes
o Once in a while
o No
9. Do you think scientific approach is the best approach to anything?
o Yes, definitely
o Depends on the situation
o No
10.When conversing with someone, who has less knowledge than you
(e.g. lower education level) you:
o
Feel superior
o Find an excuse to end the conversation.
o Try to adjust your speech to make him/her comfortable.
14 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
15/24
Maximum A's mean your personality type is 'A', maximum 'B's mean you are a
mixed personality i.e. AB and maximum 'C's mean you are type B personality.
Implicit Personality Theory
Where do such misguided judgements come from? As suggested by Aschs
research on central traits, our knowledge about people is structured by our prior
set of beliefs about which traits go together, and the resulting personality
judgements we make often defy the rules of cold logic. These assumptions or
nave belief systems that we have about the associations among personality
traits are called an implicit personality theory. In these personality assumptions,
we tend to assume that all good things occur together in persons and that all bad
things do as well, with little overlap between the two. Believing that an individual
possesses one trait leads to the inference of other traits or behaviors assumed to
be associated with the observed trait (Leyens, 1991). This is why many young
adults perceive that someone whom they know and like could not be HIV-
positive. This conslusion is arrived at because the alternative judgment isinconsistent with their assumptions about the relationships among traits and
behaviors.
In an implicit personality theory, as in impression formation generally, there
appears to be operating a principle of evaluative consistency a tendency to
view others in a way that is internally consistent. Even when contradictory
information is made available, we still generally persist in viewing people as
either consistently good or bad. In this effort toward consisitency, we will often
distort or explain away contradictory information.
Although implicit personality theories are commonly employed in making
social judgments, some people rely on them more than others. Research by Chi-
15 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
16/24
yue Chiu and his coworkers (1997) indicates that implicit theories are used more
often by people who believe that personality consists of fixed, static traits than by
those who believe that personality is dynamic and changing. This relation was
found both in the individualist culture of the United States and in collectivist Hong
Kong. These findings are important because they suggest that although implicit
personality theories may used by people around the world, there is a good deal
of individual variation in the extent to which they are used. Additionally, findings
by Chiu et al. point toward a possible cultural variation in the use of implicit
personality theories. They found that more Americans than Chinese believe in
fixed personality traits, which suggests that implicit personality theories are used
more often by Americans.
Personality Difference
Even though our attraction to others appears to be part of out genetic makeup,
there is clear evidence, both anecdotal and scientific, that we differ in our
motivation to seek social contact (Wong & Csikzsentmihalyi, 1991).
People who have a high need for affiliation tend to be very active in pursuingsocial contacts and place a high premium on positive outcomes in such pursuits
(Crouse & Mehrabian, 1997).
In contrast, those with a low need for affiliation are less likely to respond
negatively when their social interactions become less rewarding (Hill, 1991).
High need for affiliation individuals are indeed people persons they dont like
being alone and when interacting, they seek approval and avoid conflict (Stewart
& Chester, 1982).
Their desire for affiliation is also associated with being less competitive and less
likely to talk negatively about others (McClelland et al.,1982).
16 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
17/24
Social affiliation model proposes that the process underlying everyday affiliation
operates according to a homeostatic principle, meaning that we all seek to
maintain an optimal range of social contact, but what is optimal differs for each of
us. Compared with those who have a low need for affiliation, people with a high
need simply have a higher optimal affiliation range. According to this model,
when we deviate from our optimal affiliation range, we seek to re-establish it.
Thus, excess contact causes us to seek solitude, while too much solitude causes
us to pursue affiliation. (Shawn OConnor and Lorne Rosenbloods, 1996)
THE FOUR PERSONALITIES
SANGUINE CHOLERIC
KEYWORD:Popular
KEYWORD:Powerful
17 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
18/24
BEST AT:Making initial contact with peopleCreating enthusiasm and excitementEncouraging and uplifting othersInsuring the group has fun
PRESENTS AS:Outgoing and engaging
MAJOR NEEDS:Fun and adventure
BEST AT:Motivating people to actionGiving quick and clear instructionGetting it doneLeading
PRESENTS AS:Authoritative and convincing
MAJOR NEEDS:Action and excitement
PHLEGMATIC MELANCHOLY
KEYWORD:Peaceful
BEST AT:Staying calm and functionalNot over reacting to a negative situationEffective listenerMaking sure the group is relaxed andcomfortable
PRESENTS AS:Believable
MAJOR NEEDS:Rest and quiet time
KEYWORD:Perfect
BEST AT:Planning and explaining the detailsDoing it rightSensitive to the needs of othersGood with numbers, charts, graphs, etc.
PRESENTS AS:Accurate and sincere
MAJOR NEEDS:Order and understanding
PERSONALITY STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES
POPULAR SANGUINE
18 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
19/24
STRENGTHS
HOME
Appealing personalityTalkative, storytellerLife of the partyGood sense of humor
Memory for colorPhysically holds on to listenerEmotional and demonstrativeEnthusiastic and expressiveCheerful and bubbling overCuriousGood on stageLives in the presentChangeable dispositionMakes friends easilyLoves people
Thrives on complimentsSeems excitingEnvied by othersDoesnt hold grudgesPrevents dull momentsLikes spontaneous activities
WEAKNESSES
HOME
Compulsive talkerExaggerates and elaboratesDwells on triviaCant remember names
Scares others offToo happy for someHas restless energyEgotisticalNaive, gets taken inHas loud voice and laughControlled by circumstancesSeems phony to someHates to be aloneNeeds to be center stageWants to be popular
Looks for creditDominates conversationsInterrupts and doesnt listenAnswers for othersForgetful
WORK
Volunteers for jobsThinks up new activitiesLooks great on the surfaceCreative and colorfulHas energy and enthusiasmStarts in a flashy wayInspires others to joinCharms others to work
WORK
Would rather talk
Forgets obligationsDoesnt follow throughConfidence fades fastUndisciplinedPriorities out of orderDecides by feelingsEasily distractedWastes time talking
POWERFUL CHOLERIC
19 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
20/24
STRENGTHS
HOME
Born leaderDynamic and activeCompulsive need for changeMust correct wrongsStrong willedand decisiveNot easily discouragedIndependent and self-sufficientExudes confidenceHas little need for friendsWill work for group activity
Will lead and organizeIs usually right
WEAKNESSES
HOME
BossyImpatientQuick temperedCant relax
Too impetuousEnjoys controversy & argumentsWont give up when losingComes on too strongInflexibleIs not complimentaryDislikes tears and emotionsIs unsympatheticTends to use peopleDominates othersDecides for others
Knows everythingCan do everything betterIs too independentPossessive of friends and mateCant say, Im sorryMay be right but unpopular
WORK
Goal-orientedSees the whole pictureOrganizes wellSeeks practical solutionsMoves quickly to actionDelegates workInsists on productionMakes the goalStimulates activityThrives on opposition
WORK
Little tolerance for mistakesDoesnt analyze detailsBored by triviaMay make rash decisionsMay be rude or tactlessManipulates peopleDemanding of othersEnd justifies the meansWork may become his godDemands loyalty in the ranks.
PEACEFUL PHLEGMATIC
20 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
21/24
STRENGTHS
HOME
LowkeypersonalityEasygoing and relaxedCalm, cool, and collected
Patient, wellbalancedConsistent lifeQuiet, but wittySympathetic and kindKeeps emotions hiddenHappily reconciled to lifeAllpurposepersonEasy to get along withPleasant and enjoyableInoffensive
Good listenerDry sense of humorEnjoys watching peopleHas many friendsHas compassion and concernUnenthusiastic
WEAKNESSES
HOME
Fearful and worried
IndecisiveAvoids responsibilityQuiet will of ironToo shy and reticentToo compromisingSelfrighteousDampens enthusiasmStays uninvolvedIs not excitingIndifferent to plansJudges others
Sarcastic and teasingResists change
WORK
Competent and steadyPeaceful and agreeableHas administrative abilityMediates problemsAvoids conflictsGood under pressureFinds the easy way
WORK
Not goalorientedLacks selfmotivationHard to get movingResents being pushedLazy and carelessWould rather watch
PERFECT MELANCHOLY
21 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
22/24
STRENGTHS
HOME
Deep and thoughtfulAnalyticalSerious and purposefulGeniusprone
Talented and creativeArtistic or musicalPhilosophical and poeticAppreciative of beautySensitive to othersSelfsacrificingConscientiousIdealisticMakes friends cautiouslyContent to stay in backgroundAvoids causing attention
Faithful and devotedWill listen to complaintsCan solve others problemsDeep concern for other peopleMoved to tears with compassion
WEAKNESSES
HOME
Remembers the negativesMoody and depressedOff in another world
Low selfimageHas selective hearingSelfcenteredToo introspectiveGuilt feelingsPersecution complexTends to hypochondriaLives through othersInsecure sociallyWithdrawn and remoteCritical of others
Holds back affectionDislikes those in oppositionSuspicious of peopleAntagonistic and vengefulFull of contradictions
WORK
ScheduleorientedPerfectionist, high standardsDetailconsciousPersistent and thoroughOrderly and organizedNeat and tidyEconomicalSees the problemsFinds creative solutionsNeeds to finish what he startsLikes charts, graphs, figures,lists
WORK
Not peopleorientedDepressed over imperfectionsChooses difficult workHesitant to start projectsSpends too much time planningPrefers analysis to workSelfdeprecatingHard to pleaseStandards often too highDeep need for approval.
Source :http://www.mensfraternity.com/assets/documents/text/LeaderGuide_WH_Four%20Personalities%20Handout.pdf
References
22 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
23/24
o See K. Onstad (December 1995). No Jobs? No Problem!. Canadian
Business.
o J. Aley (February 5, 1996). Wall Streets King Quant. Fortune.
o Crouse, B. B., & Mehrabian, A. (1977) Affiliation of opposite-sexedstrangers. Journal of Research in Personality
o Hill, C. A. (1991) Seeking emotional support: The influence of affiliative
need and partner warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
o Stewart, A.J., & Chester, N. L. (1982). Sex differences in human social
motives: Achievement, affiliation and power. In A. J. Stewart (Ed.), Motivationand society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
o Leyens, J.-P. (Ed.). (1991). Prolegomena for the concept of implicit
theories of personality. European Bulletin of Conitive Psychology.
o Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Perspectives on personality(4th
ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
o Burger, J. M. (1993). Personality(3rd ed.) Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
o Ridley, M (1999). Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23
chapters. London: Fourth Estate.
o Schultz, D., & Schultz, S.E. (1994). Theories of personality(5th ed.)
Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
o McCombs, B. (1991). Metacognition and motivation in higher level
thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American EducationalResearch Association, Chicago, IL.
Internet Sites
23 | P a g e
-
8/7/2019 Organizational Behaviour - Revised 190110
24/24
http://www.mensfraternity.com/assets/documents/text/LeaderGuide_WH_Four%20Personalities%20Handout.pdf
http://wilderdom.com/personality/L5-1WhatIsPersonality.html
http://www.more-selfesteem.com/test.htm
http://www.mensfraternity.com/assets/documents/text/LeaderGuide_WH_Four%20Personalities%20Handout.pdfhttp://www.mensfraternity.com/assets/documents/text/LeaderGuide_WH_Four%20Personalities%20Handout.pdfhttp://wilderdom.com/personality/L5-1WhatIsPersonality.htmlhttp://wilderdom.com/personality/L5-1WhatIsPersonality.htmlhttp://www.more-selfesteem.com/test.htmhttp://www.mensfraternity.com/assets/documents/text/LeaderGuide_WH_Four%20Personalities%20Handout.pdfhttp://www.mensfraternity.com/assets/documents/text/LeaderGuide_WH_Four%20Personalities%20Handout.pdfhttp://wilderdom.com/personality/L5-1WhatIsPersonality.htmlhttp://www.more-selfesteem.com/test.htm