ORGANISATIONS, WORK AND SEXUAL DIVISIONS: Occupational change in market economies and remaking...
-
Upload
ariana-oneill -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of ORGANISATIONS, WORK AND SEXUAL DIVISIONS: Occupational change in market economies and remaking...
ORGANISATIONS, WORK AND SEXUAL DIVISIONS:
Occupational change in market economies and remaking gender?
Janette Webb
University of Edinburgh
Framing Questions
• Interactions of markets and gendered power relations
• Are some forms of ‘market economy’ more conducive to greater equality between the sexes?
• What drives what? – Cultural change in gender relations drives
economic restructuring?– Economic restructuring, and occupational change,
drives cultural change in gender relations?
Two Models from Feminist Political Economy
• Varieties of Capitalism (VOC)– Liberal market economies (LME)– Coordinated market economies (CME)– These result in different patterns of occupational
sex segregation and inequality
• Post-Industrialism– Change as dominated by universal dynamics of
post-industrial shift, which reinforce occupational sex segregation and ‘gender essentialism’
Varieties of Capitalism
• LMEs– Education and training for general skills– Deregulated, individualised labour markets– Short-term orientation to profitability– Social policy emphasis on individual responsibility
• CMEs– Education and training for organisation- and industry-specific
skills– Coordinated/regulated labour markets– Long-term orientation to governance and profitability– Social policy emphasis on protection and pooling of risk
Feminist Analysis of VOC
• CMEs/ specific skills regimes – Expected to have higher levels of occupational sex-
segregation
• LMEs/ general skills regimes– Expected to have less segregated occupations but higher
income inequality
• Might speculate therefore that:– gender is a more prominent principle of social division in
CMEs?– While class is more prominent in LMEs?
• Drivers of change perceived as primarily economic, overlaid on essentialised model of dualistic gender
Feminist Post-Industrialism
• Interaction of universalising economic forces of post-industrialism with universalistic gender dualism
• Effect is to reinforce occupational segregation• Gender ideology, rather than economics,
drives – horizontal segregation between manual (male)
and non-manual (female) occupations– and pervasive vertical segregation within
occupational hierarchies
Comments on the VOC and Post-Industrial Models
• Utility of models emphasising one or two macro-level concepts to explain complexity
• Limitations of labour market data over 15 years old when dealing with questions of economic restructuring
• Snap shot of occupational segregation at a single time
• Focus on occupational categories rather than incorporating industrial sector
Using Data from ILO Labour Market Stats
• Less discriminating occupational classification• Problems of different cultural interpretations of the
‘same’ occupational classifications• But allows some longitudinal comparison • And more recent data (1985-2005)• Crude occupational breakdown compensated for to
some extent by ability to disaggregate occupation by industrial sector
• Descriptive statistics for concentration of men and women in occupations rather than index of segregation
Rationale for Selection of Countries
• Sweden and Japan as contrasting examples of CMEs
• USA and UK as contrasting examples of LMEs
• Likely to share common shift towards services
• Since 1985, all have increased proportion of economically active population
Total Economically Active, 1985-2004
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
Sw85 Sw04 USA85 USA05 UK85 UK05 Ja85 Ja05
Women as % of Workforce
0
5101520253035404550
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
SwedenUSAUK Japan
Declining Employment in Extractive & Transformative Industries
• Growth in economically active population• Alongside decline in proportion of
employment in extractive and transformative industries
• Japan continues to have the highest proportion of employees in these sectors– now has only 31% in such employment– equivalent to the position of the USA twenty years
earlier
% of Labour Force in Extractive & Transformative Industries
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
SwUSAUKJpn
% of Women in Extractive & Transformative Industries
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
SwUSAUKJpn
Labour Force in Extractive & Transformative Industries
• As proportion of employment declined, male-concentration increased
• Most noticeable in Japan - women were 35% of employees; now 28%
0
20
40
60
80
100
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
all employees
SwUSAUKJpn
0
20
40
60
80
100
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
women
SwUSAUKJpn
% of Labour Force in Services
0102030405060708090
100
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
SwUSAUKJpn
% of Women in Services
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
SwUSAUKJpn
Labour Force in Services
• Japan - men in the majority in services
• Sweden - post-industrial shift associated with less female concentration in 2005 than 1985
• No simple relationship between post-industrialism and ‘universal reinforcement’ of sexual divisions
0
20
40
60
80
100
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
all employees
SwUSAUKJpn
0
20
40
60
80
100
mid-1980s mid-1990s mid-2000s
women
SwUSAUKJpn
Change in Occupational Structures
• Occupational upgrading?– Crude measure shows increasing proportion of
workforce employed in managerial, admin, professional, technical and associated occupations in 2004-05 than in mid-1980s/1990s
• Combined with gradually decreasing proportion of employees in production jobs (including skilled craft and routine manual work)
Occupational structures, 2004-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Sweden USA UK Japan
profsmanagerialclericalsales/svcAFFproduction
Sweden, 1984-2004: occupation by male-female
0102030405060708090
100
prof8
4 '94 '04
mgr8
4 '94 '04
cler
84 '94 '04
sale
s84 '94 '04
prod84 '94 '04
femalemale
USA, 1985-2005: occupation by male-female
0102030405060708090
100
prof8
5 '95 '05
mgr8
5 '95 '05
cler
85 '95 '05
sale
s85 '95 '05
man
l85 '95 '05
femalemale
UK, 1995 & 2005: occupation by male-female
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
prof9
5'05
mgr9
5 '05
tech
95 '05
cl.s
vc95 '05
man
l95
'05
femalemale
Japan, 1985-2005: occupation by male-female
0102030405060708090
100
prof8
5 '95 '05
mgr8
5 '95 '05
cler
85 '95 '05
sale
s85 '95 '05
svc8
5 '95 '05
prod85 '95 '05
femalemale
Differences in Occupational Concentrations of
men and women - LMEs v CMEs? Sweden
0
20
40
60
80
100
prof8
4 '94 '04
mgr8
4 '94 '04
cler
84 '94 '04
sale
s84 '94 '04
prod84 '94 '04
femalemale
USA
0
20
40
60
80
100
prof8
5 '95 '05
mgr8
5 '95 '05
cler
85 '95 '05
sale
s85 '95 '05
man
l85 '95 '05
femalemale
UK (95 & 05 only)
0102030405060708090
100
prof9
5'0
5
mgr9
5 '05
tech
95 '05
cl.s
vc95 '0
5
man
l95 '0
5
femalemale
Japan
0
20
40
60
80
100
prof8
5 '95 '05
mgr8
5 '95 '05
cler
85 '95 '05
sale
s85 '95 '05
svc8
5 '95 '05
prod85 '95 '05
femalemale
Male-female split among occupations 2004/5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sweden USA UK Japan
Professionals
malefemale
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sweden USA UK Japan
Managers & Administrators
malefemale
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sweden USA UK Japan
Clerical workers
malefemale
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sweden USA UK Japan
Production
malefemale
The Effect of Industrial Sector on Occupational Divisions
• Using only 2004/5 data• Excludes Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing• Groups Industrial Sectors into 3:
– extractive and transformative – business and finance, real estate and retail
services– public and welfare services
• Showing % of women in each occupation
Distribution of women in occupations by industry, Sweden, 2004
0
10
20
30
4050
60
70
80
90
100
mg/ad prof tech cler svc prod
extractive &transformativefinancial, real estate,retaileducation, HSW
Distribution of women in occupations by industry, USA 2005
010
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
mg/ad pro/t&a cler svc prod
extractive &transformativefinancial, real estate,retailingeducation, HSW
Distribution of women in occupations by industry, UK 2005
0
10
20
30
4050
60
70
80
90
100
mg/ad prof tech cler svc prod
extractive &transformativefinancial, real estate,retailingeducation, HSW
Distribution of women in occupations by industry, Japan 2005
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
mg/ad prof &tech
cler svc prod
extractive &transformativefinancial, real estate,retailingeducation, HSW
Distribution of women in occupations
0102030405060708090
100
mg/ad prof tech cler svc prod
Sweden
extractive &transformativefinancial, real estate,retaileducation, HSW
0102030405060708090
100
mg/ad pro/t&a cler svc prod
USA
extractive &transformativefinancial, real estate,retailingeducation, HSW
0102030405060708090
100
mg/ad prof tech cler svc prod
UK
extractive &transformativefinancial, real estate,retailingeducation, HSW
0102030405060708090
mg/ad prof &tech
cler svc prod
Japan
extractive &transformativefinancial, real estate,retailingeducation, HSW
Occupation by Industry & VOC
• No simple relationship between LME policies and lesser concentrations of men and women in segregated occupations
• In the UK, barriers to the a-typical sex entering occupations do not seem to be lower than in Sweden
• Swedish social-democratic model more effective in facilitating movement of women into career occupations in industry and in private sector services
Continuity of dualistic gender ideologies?
• Evidence provides support for the argument that a dualistic, if not ‘essentialist’, gender ideology continues to underpin some universally sex-differentiated occupational patterns
• Not the case however that shift to services universally reinforces sex-segregated work
• Can conjecture that effects of shift to services differ according to interaction between– cultural, and historically located, processes of gendered
power relations – political-economic strategies – equality policies – and the resulting organisation of occupations in different
sectors in different countries
Evaluation of Models
• Strengths and limitations of a feminist model of VOC – Utility
– But over-reliance on macro-structural concepts of skills and gender
– Loss of insight into process
– Need to integrate income data and inter-dependence of class with gender and ethnic divisions
– Skills, and their formation and use, are not independent of power relations, and are in flux in ‘knowledge economies’
• Strengths and limitations of a feminist post-industrialism– Identifies the intransigence of dualistic gender
– But a version of convergence theory?
What would a sociological model of the interactions of gender and markets look like?
– A situated account of the remaking of gender in the context of new occupational relationships
– Gender and markets as mutually constitutive– Organisational level is where inter-relations of
markets and personal biographies are worked out: • Occupational positions and skills are
constituted• And in their enactment produce the contested
strata of class, gender and ethnicity• Which in turn reshape occupations and skills