Oral Presentation CE&I Services Along SR 80, Birchwood Parkway to Dalton Lane (FM No....

34
Oral Presentation CE&I Services Along SR 80, Birchwood Parkway to Dalton Lane (FM No. 408286-3-62-01) January 27, 2012

Transcript of Oral Presentation CE&I Services Along SR 80, Birchwood Parkway to Dalton Lane (FM No....

Oral PresentationCE&I Services Along SR 80, Birchwood Parkway to Dalton Lane (FM No. 408286-3-62-01)

January 27, 2012

GBF Team Introduction

Sr. Project Engineer - Hamid Hosseini, P.E. Project Administrator – Jim Frye Contract Support Specialist – Carlos Sousa Sr. Bridge Inspector – Felipe Baez-De La Cruz (Atkins) Public Information Officer – Janet Cook (ComVia) QA/QC – Karina Enrico-Jackson, P.E.

Awareness/Approach to ProjectUnderstanding of Scope of Services

Full CEI services for SR-80 widening Engineering services,

on-site inspection, contract administration, survey control, sampling and testing

4.97 miles of roadway reconstruction From two lanes/undivided four lanes/divided roadway

New construction Eastbound roadway Widening, milling and resurfacing of existing roadway

Proposed westbound roadway

Awareness/Approach to ProjectUnderstanding of Scope of Services

Construction of 2 bridges over the Carloosa Branch Canal C-1

Demolition and reconstruction of 2 existing triple box culverts

Reconstruction of Birchwood Parkway intersection

Drainage improvements Structures 17 water detention ponds

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues

Right-of-Way Parcels acquisition Document review

Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs)

License Agreements (LAs) Stipulated order of takings

Driveways connections Construction adjacent to private

properties Commitments from FDOT and

parcel owners

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues

Clearing & Grubbing Major activity

Numerous oak trees “Tap rooted” Specifications Section

110-2.2 Backfilling operations

Project area = 117.4 acres Expected to be disturbed: 108.0 acres Allowable erodible earth at a time: 17.21 acres

Disposal of material Burning, chipping and hauling Burning permits and constrains

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Earthwork Operations

Major and critical activity New construction of

eastbound roadway 336, 525 cy embankment

Borrow Pit Easily and readily accessible FDOT Specifications

Section 120-6 & Section 8-7 “Time extensions will not be granted if due to the fault or

negligence of the contractor” Contractor must be aware at pre-construction conference

Presence of limestone at shallow depths Pile driving, box culverts and sheet piling

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Potential Contamination Areas

Two areas near east end of the project Former rail road grade area Cattle dipping vat area

All soil excavated within railroad grade contamination area must remain within project limits

District’s Contamination Assessment/Remediation (CAR) Contractor must test material if excavated and dispose if necessary Coordination Stockpiling material

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Asphalt Operations

7 typical sections Overbuilds ½” to 11” Pre-paving conference

Cross slope correction Paving sequence Control points

Pavement distress at +/-sta. 1855 Sufficient milling depths? Core pavement prior to

construction

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues

Utility Coordination Majority of utilities on the north side

of the westbound roadway Century Link, Port La Belle Utilities,

Level 3 Communications, Comcast, etc. Port La Belle utilities conflict with

drainage structures S-28 & S28a at sta. 1758+73

Unidentified “buried fiber optic cable” 26RT of CL from sta. 1767 to end

Proactive approach for utility conflict resolution

Two utility work schedules utility coordinator

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues MOT/Safety

3 Traffic Control Phases Lane closures restrictions

Weekdays 7:00am to 8:30am 4:30pm to 5:30pm

EOR Business/property

entrances Area near Birchwood

intersection not incorporated

Coordination

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Environmental/Permits

Proposed eastbound roadway directly over wetlands Staging areas Dewatering

SFWMD & Army Corps of Engineers

SWPPP/NPDES Endangered species Dewatering permits Water quality monitoring

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues Drainage Structures

31 new drainage structures

2 triple box culverts Minimum conflict with

utilities “Contractor must

maintain positive flow” Two phase construction

sequence

Awareness/Approach to ProjectIdentification of Unique Project Issues 2 New Bridges (EB and WB) 2 Lanes and Shoulders 4-ft Bicycle Lane EB

Demolition (existing) Remove existing end bent piles Remove intermediate piles

minimum of 2’ below proposed grade line

Pile Driving EB end bents 9 piles; WB end bents 8 piles Jetting is not allowed 4 test piles

Core Boring Reports and Limestone

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Borrow Pits Nearby

FDOT Specifications Section 120-6 Ave Maria Aggregate Pit Seminole Reservation Pit Baron Water District Pit

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Cost Saving/Triple Box

Culvert Suggestion Structure S-22 at sta.

1710+48 Overall good

condition No critical cracks

present Further investigation Commitments with

permitting agencies

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Quality Assurance Approach

Led by Karina Enrico-Jackson, P.E. Develop QA plan specific to project Establish several goals and expectations Periodical reviews semi-annual Final estimates reviews 30, 60 and 90% of contract

funds Monitoring CEI cost Review overall team performance with Project

Manager

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction

Project background New rural roadway Endangered species Natural scenery and landscape Army Corps of Engineers, SFWMD, Florida Fish & Wildlife

Commission Greenroads™ Foundation Greenroads™ Rating System

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction

Greenroad™ Rating System Created and managed by Greenroads ™ Foundation

CH2M Hill; University of Washington Basic project requirements first step Voluntary/custom credits not required, varies from

project to project 4 different certification levels

Certified, silver, gold and evergreen

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique

Concepts / Green Roadway Construction

Basic project requirement credits

Requirement

PR-1 Environmental Review Process

PR-2 Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)

PR-3 Life Cycle Inventory (LCI)

PR-4 Quality Control Plan

PR-5 Noise Mitigation Plan

PR-6 Waste Management Plan

PR-7 Pollution Prevention Plan

PR-8 Low-Impact Development (LID) Study

PR-9 Pavement Management System

PR-10 Site Maintenance Plan

PR-11 Education Outreach

DOES NOT GUARANTEE CERTIFICATION

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction

Voluntary and Custom Credits Environment & water Storm water, habitat, vegetation,

etc. Access & equity Culture, aesthetics, safety, etc. Construction activities Construction equipment, process,

quality Materials & resources Material extraction, processing,

transport Pavement technology Pavement design, materials,

function Custom Proposed

32-42 pts 43-54 pts 55-63 pts 64 + pts

PROJECT RATING

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction

How the Process Works

Apply

Agreement

Assessment

Award

Eligibility is determined Project Number is assigned Greenroads™ Reviewer is assigned

Sign review agreement Schedule Introductory Presentation/Webinar

Preliminary review Make corrections Submit for final review

Rating is assigned Put up the Greenroads sign

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added

Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction Types of Review and Assessment

•Single project review•Certification can be awarded

•Post-construction review•High dollar projects

•Low budget projects•Disjointed segment projects

•Multiple projects for a single owner

•Pre-certification review based on BPR•Not certified without previous approval of roadway owner-agency

Basic Project Rating (BPR)

Phased Project Review (PPR)

Capital Improvements Package

Agency Customization Package

Consultant/Contractor Package

Awareness/Approach to ProjectBest or Value Added

Unique Concepts / Green Roadway Construction Why is this a great idea?

Minimize impact on ecosystem/promote sustainability Help Department save money

ex: Recycled materials can create 17% in savings Warm mix asphalt can save $0.35-$5.00/ton Long lasting roads that require less

maintenance Sustainable construction practices can help Department

receive more federal funds and stimulate market Will set precedent in Florida

No Greenroads™ project has ever been constructed in the StateGBF is ready to assist the Department in this new

venture and will assume all the costs associated with this concept

Proposed StaffingQuantity Proposed - Team Organization

FDOT Project ManagerTimothy Hendrix, P.E.

QA/QC

Karina Enrico-Jackson, P.E. (GBF)

Sr. Project Engineer

Hamid Hosseini, P.E. (GBF)

Project Administrator

James “Jim” Frye (GBF)

Sr. Roadway/Bridge Inspectors

Felipe Baez-De La Cruz (Atkins)Brian O’Neill (GBF)

Contract Support Specialist

Carlos Sousa (GBF)

Inspectors

Eduardo Mendez, E.I. GBF)Israel Rodriguez (GBF)Shaista Javed (Atkins)

As Needed Services

Survey (EAI) (DBE)Stephen Tate, PSM

Richard StepGeotechnical

Engineering/PDA (AFT)Michael Muchard P.E.

Donald Robertson, P.E.Public Information

(ComVia)Janet Cook

Utility Coordination (GBF)

Michael Posten

Asphalt Plant Inspector

Roberto Martinez. GBF)

Proposed StaffingQualifications/Availability/Certifications

Cross-trained personnel with immediate availability

Proposed StaffingStaffing Quality/Qualifications

Proposed Personnel Yrs of Exp. Experience Highlights

Hamid Hosseini, P.E.Sr. Project Engineer

25 Proven Performance in District 1 and Fort Myers Operations; Sr. Project Engineer on the SR 70 corridor in St. Lucie County, reconstruction of a two-lane, two-way undivided highway to a four lane divided rural highway, identical to the work anticipated on this project

James “Jim” FryeProject Administrator

42 Significant contractor/CEI experience in roadway and bridge reconstruction projects; Proactive in staying ahead of the contractor and recommending viable resolutions; Currently PA to the FMOC on the I-75 Alley

Carlos SousaCSS

20 Stellar post audit reviews; Additional CTQP certs in Concrete Field Technician, Levels I & II allow him ability to understand field operations as it relates to concrete pours which are anticipated on this project

Felipe Baez-De La CruzSr. Inspector

12 Recently the Senior Inspector for roadway improvements onUS 27 and SR 80 in Hendry County; Familiar with the project limits and understands expectations of FMOC.

Brian O’NeillSr. Inspector

7 Recent/current experience with Fort Myers Operations and District 1; Currently Sr. Inspector on the I-75 (Alley) at Alley Recreational Access

Israel RodriguezRoadway/ITS Inspector

9 CEI focus on roadway reconstruction and ITS projects; well versed in the areas of ITS and fiber optics; IMSA certified; Currently Inspector on the I-75 (Alley) at Alley Recreational Access

Proposed StaffingStaffing Quality/Qualifications

Proposed Personnel Yrs of Exp. Experience Overview

Eduardo Mendez, E.I.Roadway/Bridge Inspector

1 Very knowledgeable of FDOT District 1 policies and procedures and is currently Inspector on I-75 (Alley) at Alley Recreational Access

Shaista JavedBridge Inspector

20 Degreed architect with horizontal and vertical CEI experience; District 1 experience includes widening of SR 80 at Palomino Dr. and Indian Hills

Roberto MartinezAsphalt Plant Inspector

7 Highly knowledgeable in asphalt paving and asphalt plant operations; IMSA certified; Experience in District 1

Karina Enrico-Jackson, P.E.QA/QC

12 Experience with Fort Myers Operations and District 1; Former FDOT Engineer/PE Trainee

Janet CookPublic Information

17 Former FDOT employee for 12 years; Very knowledgeable of District 1 and FMOC having managed the District 1 Consultant CCEI and DistrictWide programs for over 6 years

Stephen Tate, PSMSurvey Manager

28 Significant survey experience with District 1

Michael Muchard, P.E. Sr. Geotechnical Engineer

22 Significant foundation testing experience in District 1; Considered an expert in STATNAMIC™, dynamic, and Static load testing methods

Michael PostenUtility Coordination

45 Significant FDOT utility relocation experience including recent experience on the I-595 Expansion

A Proven District 1 Team that Will Ensure Success

Proposed StaffingSimilar Experience (GBF)

Reconstruction of 3.1 miles of a two lane, two-way undivided highway to a four lane divided rural highway

Construction of 2 bridges Rehabilitation of 1 bridge, a

12’ shared use path Major earthwork Drainage Revetment activities Recipient of the Davis

Productivity Award SR 70 Segment 4 ($18m)

Grade 4.7

Proposed StaffingSimilar Experience (GBF)

Reconstruction of 4.3 miles of a two lane, two way undivided highway to a four lane divided rural

Construction of 5 bridges Bridge widening 3 mile continuation of

the 12’ shared use path Major earthwork Drainage Revetment activities SR 70 Segment 5 ($29m)

Grade 4.7

Proposed StaffingSimilar Experience (GBF)

Reconstruction of 4.3 miles of a two lane undivided to a four lane divided rural roadway

Horizontal roadway realignment

Culvert construction Canal relocation Utility relocation Major drainage improvements Public information

SR 70 Segment 3 ($13m) (On Going)

Other ConsiderationsCommunication Abilities

Critical elements of project success Communication Information sharing Project specific email accounts Easy access to project data through

internal VPN network “Citrix” & “Microsoft Exchange”

All GBF staff are proficient with computers and relevant software Site Manager, LIMS, Hummingbird, etc.

Equipped with tools for flexibility and quick response i.e. Laptops with wireless internet cards, Mi-Fis, smart

phones with digital cameras

Other Considerations Commitment to Satisfy Department Needs

Proven team with the FMOC Quality projects

Proven performance with FMOC Excellent communication with

FDOT project manager Resolve construction issues

at lowest possible level Timely completion of required documentation

On-time, on-budget project delivery Quality close-outs Innovative ideas

FDOT is our #1 Client

Why Choose the GBF Team

Deliver quality project exceeding budget and time goals “No learning curve”

Proven performance with FMOC Strong team with qualified and experienced personnel

familiar with District 1 and Fort Myers Ops policy, procedures and organization

Provide sound project management Accurate record keeping Extensive similar experience with District 1 Consistent commitment to quality