Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

28
Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans Qifa Ke, Michael Isard, Yuan Yu Microsoft Research Silicon Valley EuroSys 2013

description

Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans. Qifa Ke, Michael Isard, Yuan Yu Microsoft Research Silicon Valley EuroSys 2013. Distributed Data-Parallel Computing. Distributed execution plan generated by query compiler ( DryadLINQ ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Page 1: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution

PlansQifa Ke, Michael Isard, Yuan Yu

Microsoft Research Silicon ValleyEuroSys 2013

Page 2: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Distributed Data-Parallel Computing

• Distributed execution plan generated by query compiler (DryadLINQ)• Automatic distributed execution (Dryad)

Page 3: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Execution Plan Graph (EPG)• EPG: distributed execution plan

represented as a DAG:- Representing computation and

dataflow of data-parallel program

• Core data structure in distributed execution engines

- Task distribution- Job management- Fault tolerance

M

D

MG

G

R

X

M

D

M

D

MG

G

R

X

MG

G

R

X

Map

Distribute

Merge

GroupBy

Reduce

EPG of MapReduce

Page 4: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Outline• Motivational problems • Optimus system• Graph rewriters• Experimental evaluation• Summary & conclusion

Page 5: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Problem 1: Data Partitioning• Basic operation to achieve data parallelism• Example: MapReduce

- Number of partitions = number of reducers• More reducers: better load balancing but more

overheads in scheduling and disk I/O- Data skew: e.g., popular keys

• Require statistics of Mapper outputs- Hard to estimate at compile time- But available at runtime

M

D

MG

G

R

X

M

D

M

D

MG

G

R

X

MG

G

R

X

We need dynamic data partitioning.

Page 6: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Problem 2: Matrix Computation• Widely used in large-scale data analysis• Data model: sparse or dense matrix?

- Compile-time: unknown density of intermediate matrices

- Sparse input matrices: - Intermediate result may be dense

How to dynamically choose data model and alternative algorithms ?

• Alternative algorithms for a given matrix computation- Chosen based on runtime data statistics of input matrices

Page 7: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Problem 3: Iterative Computation• Required by machine learning and

data analysis• Problem: stop condition unknown

at compile time- Each job performs N iterative steps- Submit multiple jobs and check

convergence at client

• How to enable iterative computation in one single job ?

- Simplifies job monitoring and fault-tolerance

- Reduces job submission overhead

A

B

In Ctr

Iter 1

A

B

Iter 2 Job 1

Job 2

Page 8: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Problem 4: Fault Tolerance• Intermediate results can be re-generated

by re-executing vertices• Important intermediate results:

expensive to regenerate when lost- Compute-intensive vertices- Critical chain: a long chain of vertices reside

in same machine due to data locality

• How to identify and protect important intermediate results at runtime?

X

A

B

C

Page 9: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Problem 5: EPG Optimization

• Compile-time query optimization- Using data statistics available at compile time- EPG typically unchanged during execution

• Problems with compile-time optimization:- Data statistics of intermediate stages hard to estimate

• Complicated by user-defined functions

• How to optimize EPG at runtime?

Query compiler DryadLINQ EPG

Distributed execution

engine: Dryad

User program:

LINQ query

Client computer Compute cluster

Page 10: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Optimus: Dynamic Graph Rewriting• Dynamically rewrite EPG based on:

- Data statistics collected at runtime- Compute resources available at runtime

• Goal: extensible- Implement rewriters at language layer

• Without modifying execution engine (e.g., Dryad) - Allows users to specify rewrite logic

Page 11: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Example: MapReduceStatistics

collection at data plane

Rewrite message sent to graph

rewriter at control plane

• Merge small partitions• Split popular keys

H

M

D

H

M

D

H

M

D MG

GH

Graph rewriter

Rewrite message

MG

G

R

X

MG

G

R

X

MG

G

R

X

HM

DHM

DHM

D

MG

GRX

MG

MG

KRX

RX

GRX

GH

Page 12: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Outline• Motivational problems• Optimus system• Graph rewriters• Experimental evaluation• Summary & conclusion

Page 13: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Optimus System Architecture

• Build on DryadLINQ and Dryad• Modules

- Statistics collecting- Rewrite messaging

• Data plane control plane

- Graph rewriting

• Extensible- Statistics and rewrite

logic at language/user layers

- Rewriting operation at execution layer

Clie

nt c

ompu

ter User Program User-defined

StatisticsUser-defined Rewrite Logic

MessagingWorker

Vertex Code

Dryad Worker Vertex

Worker Vertex Harness

Clus

ter

…..

Dryad Job Manager (JM)

Core Execution Engine

Rewriter Module

Statistics

Rewrite Logic

EPG Worker Vertex Code Statistics Rewrite Logic

DryadLINQ Compiler with Optimus Extensions

Page 14: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Estimate/Collect Data Statistics• Low overhead: piggy-back into existing

vertices - Pipelining “H” into “M”

• Extensible- Statistics estimator/collector defined at

language layer or user-level

• All at data plane: avoid overwhelming control plane

- “H”: distributed statistics estimation/collection

- “MG” and “GH”: merge statistics into rewriting message

H

M

D

H

M

D

H

M

D MG

GH

Graph rewriter

Rewrite message

MG

G

R

X

MG

G

R

X

MG

G

R

X

Page 15: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Graph Rewriting Module• A set of primitives to query and modify EPG• Rewriting operation depends on vertex state:

- INACTIVE: all rewriting primitives applicable- RUNNING: killed and transited to INACTIVE, discarding

partial results- COMPLETED: redirect vertex I/O

Page 16: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Outline• Motivational problems• Optimus system• Graph rewriters• Experimental evaluation• Summary & conclusion

Page 17: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Dynamic Data (Co-)Partitioning• Co-partitioning:

- Use a common parameter set to partition multiple data sets - Used by multi-source operators, e.g., Join

• Co-range partition in Optimus:

• “H”: histogram at each partition• “GH”: merged histogram

• : composition, application specific

• “K”: estimate range keys based on

• Rewriting message: range keys• Rewriting operation: splitting merge nodes

I

H

D

MG

GH

I

H

D

MG

K

I

H

D

MG

I

H

D

MG

I

H

D

MGMGMG MG

Graph rewriter

Rewrite message

Page 18: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Hybrid JoinIH

IH

IH

IH

IH

GH

K

D D

MG MG MG MG

D D

MG MG MG MG

D

J J J JD1

JJ

• Co-partition to prepare data for partition-wise Join• Skew detected at runtime• Re-partition skewed

partition- Local broadcast join

Page 19: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Iterative Computation

• Optimus: enables iterative computation in a single job

- “C”: check stop condition

- Construct another loop if needed

A

B

In Ctr

Iter 1

A

B

Iter 2

C

Graph rewriter

Rew

rite

mes

sage

Out

C

Page 20: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Matrix Multiplication• Different ways to do

- Choose based on matrix sizes and density

A B C D E F G H

AE BG AF BH CE CF DHDG

AE+BG AF+BH CE+DG CF+DH

A B C D E F G H

AE BF CG DH

AE+BF+CG+DH

A B C D E F G H

AG BG CG DG

AE BE CE DE

AF BF CF GF

AH BH CH DH

A B C D V

AV BV CV DV

Page 21: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Matrix Computation• Systems dedicated to matrix computations: MadLINQ• Optimus: extensibility allows integrating matrix

computation with general-purpose DryadLINQ computations• Runtime decisions

- Data partitioning: subdivide matrices- Data model: sparse or dense- Implementation: a matrix operation often has many

algorithmic implementations

Page 22: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Reliability Enhancer for Fault Tolerance• Replication graph to protect important data

generated by “A”:

A

B

A

B

C

O

• “C” vertex: • copy output of “A” to

another computer• “O” vertex: • allow “B” choose one of

two inputs to “O”

Page 23: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Outline• Motivational problems• Optimus system• Graph rewriters• Experimental evaluation• Summary & conclusion

Page 24: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Evaluation: Product-Offer Matching by Join

• Input: 5M products + 4M offers- Matching function: compute intensive

• Algorithms:- Partition-wise GroupJoin- Broadcast-Join- CoGroup: specialized solution- Optimus

Baseline CoGroup Broadcast Optimus

0.82 0.72 0.55 0.81

Aggregated CPU utilization

Job completion time Cluster (machine) utilization

Page 25: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Evaluation: Matrix Multiplication• Movie recommendation by collaborative filtering:

- Dataset: Netflix challenge. • Matrix R: , sparsity

• Comparisons:- Mahout- MadLINQ- Optimus with sparse representation (S-S-S)- Optimus with data model adaption (S-D-D)

Job completion time in seconds

46800

Page 26: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Related Work• Dryad: system-level rewriting without semantics of code and data• Database: dynamic graph rewriting in a single server environment

- Eddies: fine-grain (record-level) optimization- Eddies + Optimus: combine record-level and vertex-level optimization

• CIEL: programming/execution model different from DryadLINQ/Dryad

- Dynamically expands EPG by scripts running at each worker- Hard to achieve some dynamic optimizations:

• Replacing a running task with a subgraph• Reliability enhancer.

- Ciel can incorporate Optimus-like components to support dynamic optimizations.

• RoPE: uses statistics of previously-executed queries to optimize new jobs using same queries

Page 27: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Summary & Conclusion• A flexible/extensible framework to modify EPG at

runtime• Enable runtime optimizations and specializations

hard to achieve in other systems• A rich set of graph rewriters

- Substantial performance benefit compared to statically generated plan

• A versatile addition to a data-parallel execution framework

Page 28: Optimus: A Dynamic Rewriting Framework for Data-Parallel Execution Plans

Thanks!