Opinion Formation and Spreading

22
Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 1 Institute for Web Science and Technologies · University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany Web and Internet Science Group · ECS · University of Southampton, UK & Opinion Formation and Spreading Schafft Digitalisierung eine eigene Dynamik in der Meinungsbildung? Steffen Staab @ststaab http://west.uni-koblenz.de http://wais.soton.ac.uk

Transcript of Opinion Formation and Spreading

Page 1: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 1Institute for Web Science and Technologies · University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany

Web and Internet Science Group · ECS · University of Southampton, UK &

Opinion Formation and SpreadingSchafft Digitalisierung eine eigene Dynamik in der

Meinungsbildung?

Steffen Staab

@ststaab

http://west.uni-koblenz.de

http://wais.soton.ac.uk

Page 2: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 2

Individual Opinion Formation vs Opinion Spreading

(Staab, 2013)

Page 3: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 4

Individual online behavior and personality

(Buckels et al., Trolls just want to have fun, Personality and Individual Differences 2014)

Page 4: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 5

Herbert Simon: Satisficing = satisfying + sufficient

• Classification of information to be satisficing,

not to achieve optimal information organization

Individual Satisficing Information Processing

Page 5: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 6

• Experiment A: Classify web pages by bookmarks– Recommender A1: suggest classification by others

– Recommender A2: suggest earlier classification by yourself

• Experiment B: Construct optimal information structure

• Result:– A2 hides majority opinion

A2 yields results closer to optimal information structure

(Dellschaft & Staab, 2008, 2012)

Individual Satisficing Information Processing

Page 6: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 8

Herding Behaviour

Page 7: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 9

What makes something famous?

• Gangnam style?

• Mona Lisa?

• Trump tweets?

• Double rainbow?

Communication Internal Events vs.

Communication External Events

Page 8: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 10

Network structure – who follows whom?

From (Weng et al, Scientific Reports 2012)

Page 9: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 11

Majority Illusion

(Lerman et al., 2015)

Page 10: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 12

(Salganik, Dodds, Watts, Science 2006)

• Experiment

– 48 unknown songs

– Nine “worlds“ with

different users

– Songs start being liked

differently in each world

– A song that starts being

liked is liked even more

– Virtuous reinforcement

Unpredictability

Market share fluctuates heavily between

different worlds

Page 11: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 13

• Meme spreading

Limited Attention & Randomness

(Weng et al, Scientific Reports 2012)

(i) Network structure, (ii) limited screen & memory,

(iii) randomness explain macro observations

Page 12: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 14

Recipes for Spreading Misinformation

Quoting (Metaxas et al, WebSci 2010)

Comparison by (Metaxas et al, WebSci 2017)

Recipes handle unpredictability

Page 13: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 15

Herding Behaviour - Dislikes

1-2 €

per

1000

views

(CPM)

plus

extras

Page 14: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 16

Clickbait Economics

(Silverman & Alexander, Buzzfeed, November 2016)

Page 15: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 17

Media Economics

• Offline media publishes daily or twice daily

• Online media must publish every hour

– The message becomes the news

• Trump generates news by producing messages

Social Media

• (some) individuals become publishers

– Different participant types tend to have different personality profiles

Temporality

Faster republishing cycles beget

increasing dynamics beget

increasing competition for attention beget

increasing unpredictability

Page 16: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 18

Good or bad? (my subjective judgement)

Good

• Self-empowerment

– Political movements,

e.g. Campact

– Decentralized culture

Bad

• Group manipulation

– By economic players

(clickbait)

– By political players

(Breitbart)

– By consultancies

(Cambridge analytica)

Page 17: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 19

Wo aber Gefahr ist, wächst

das Rettende auch. Hölderlin

Where is danger, grows

salvation, too.

Page 18: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 20

• Confirmation bias

– Very hard to turn one‘s opinion

– Easier:

• Enforce belief

• Spread doubt

– Online viral marketing often does not work

• Everything is different the second time

– Election campaigns don‘t repeat themselves

– Facebook now is different than 5 years ago

– New online media on the rise

Individual Resilience

(Watts: Everything Is Obvious: *Once You Know the Answer)

Page 19: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 21

>100 Fact checking networks: IFCN

• Fact checking website: snopes.com

• Deleting shared content based on comments

https://fullfact.org/blog/2017/jun/general-election-2017-factchecked/

Societal Resilience: Fact Checking

(Friggeri et al,

ICWSM-2014)

Page 20: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 22

Technical Resilience: New tools

Page 21: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 23

• Who defines what resilience is beneficial?

• How to further resilience?

• Need for joint research of

– Social sciences, humanities, computer science, etc.

Conclusion: Individual, Network & Resilience

Page 22: Opinion Formation and Spreading

Steffen Staab Opinion Formation and Spreading 24

Questions?

Comments?