Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

15
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 1 Opinion and consensus dynamics in tourism digital ecosystems Rodolfo Baggio Bocconi University, Italy Giacomo Del Chiappa University of Sassari and CRENoS, Italy

Transcript of Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

Page 1: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 1

Opinion and consensus dynamics in tourism digital ecosystems

Rodolfo BaggioBocconi University, Italy

Giacomo Del ChiappaUniversity of Sassari and CRENoS, Italy

Page 2: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 2

Background (1)

The Web is not simply a technological manifestation but a reflection of social structures and processes

Page 3: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 3

Background (2)

Tourism destination : digital business ecosystem– dynamically interlinked real and virtual agents – digital components are intelligent, active and adaptive

organisms– system is in continuous evolution (perpetual beta)

Page 4: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 4

Tourism digital ecosystem

Effici

ency

System structure affects functions

Page 5: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 5

Background (3)

• Collaboration, harmonization and coordination of stakeholders’ views pivotal for effective & competitive tourism development

• Enforced through consensus building

Page 6: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 6

Objectives

• Reconfirm, on more solid bases, structural interdependence of real & virtual components in a tourism digital ecosystem

• Investigate how digital ecosystem topology affects opinion sharing & consensus development among stakeholders

Page 7: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 7

Materials• Three Italian destinations

– Elba, Gallura, Livigno– Similar size ( 1000 firms)– Similar tourism intensity

(500k tourists/year, strong seasonality)

• Collected data & built network– core tourism operators +

websites– links btw firms & websites

• also weighted

Livigno

Elba

Gallura

Page 8: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 8

Materials

Cum

ulati

ve d

eg. d

istr

ib.

Similar characteristics& topology

Page 9: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 9

Dynamic processes

• Information diffusion– epidemiological models on network substrate; – main parameter: infectivity τ – infection process possible when τ > τC (critical threshold)

• Synchronization– models consensus formation– physical model by Kuramoto: system elements are coupled

oscillators, each with intrinsic frequency & characteristic phase– main parameter: coupling K – whole system synchronises when K > KC (critical coupling)

(i.e. all oscillators have same phase -> opinions are aligned)• NB: critical values depend on system configuration

Page 10: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 10

Nets, matrices, eigenvalues & eigenvectors

• For a square (nn) matrix M, it is possible to find a scalar λ and a vector xn10 satisfying Mx = λx.

• λ, x are called eigenvalues & eigenvectors of M; – a real symmetric nn matrix M has n real eigenvalues– the set of distinct eigenvalues is called the spectrum of M

• Eigenvalues and eigenvectors “summarize” network topology– eigenvalues: global information,

eigenvectors: local (nodal) information

Page 11: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 11

Methods

• Spectral analysis, i.e. analysis of the eigenvalues and eigenvector of the adjacency & Laplacian matrices of the 3 networks– useful, and often computationally more efficient, way to

assess network main parameters

Adjacency matrix:

Laplacian matrix:

Page 12: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 12

Methods

Use 2 results from graph spectral theory:• Fiedler vector: eigenvector associated with second

smallest Laplacian eigenvalue 2 renders algebraic connectivity of the network– large gaps in plot separation between “communities”

• Spectral radius: largest eigenvalue of adjacency matrix λN

– SIS epidemic diffusion in undirected graph: critical threshold τC = 1/λN

– Synchronization: critical coupling KC 1/λN

Page 13: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 13

Results: topologyFiedler vector

Artificial network w. 2well separated modules

No trivial separation possible

Page 14: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 14

Results: diffusion & synchronization

• The values for whole ecosystems < those of single components (minimum is for weighted networks)

NB: weights assigned to links considering probable cost of links (RR=1, VR=2, VV=3)

Page 15: Opinion and Consensus Dynamics in Tourism Digital Ecosystems

ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 15

Concluding remarks

• Reconfirm that no trivial structural separation is possible between real and virtual components in a tourism system

• Combination of real and virtual elements in a single integrated system provides a more efficient substrate for the spreading of ideas or the reaching of a consensus on some issue