Opinion About Shadows out of time

2
Amando Amezcua Mora. Universidad de guanajuato. Estudios Visuales 9/09/2015. In a certain approach or study of those ancient cultures or communities with out written history or testimonies about her past and way of living the visual images play a special major role in the study of those really ancient communities and those really first early humans organized groups without any kind of writing records only leaving as the only source of information to understand ( maybe only partially) the archeological findings more specially the artistic and pictorial evidence. The Gimboutas theory of signs appear to be as presice and good acadmic approach to try to understand ceirtain but important aspects of primitive human colectives like their cosmo vision and religious beliefs, their daily life and their form of view or intrepretate the world what surrond them. I it coud be consider as an interesting reason but it coud have certain limits. Gimboutas depended in great part to made her studies in the archeological findings in a huge area and the later comparative study of the findings . Its gave some interesting and reasonable answer to some questions about the neolitic comunities in the Balcans and around the aegean sea, but maybe in the studies of some isolated ancient comunities with no conection (or not directly) with later human comunities or groups the work maybe

description

A Personal Opinion of the Gymboutas Theory.

Transcript of Opinion About Shadows out of time

Page 1: Opinion About Shadows out of time

Amando Amezcua Mora.

Universidad de guanajuato.

Estudios Visuales

9/09/2015.

In a certain approach or study of those ancient cultures or communities with out written history or

testimonies about her past and way of living the visual images play a special major role in the study of

those really ancient communities and those really first early humans organized groups without any

kind of writing records only leaving as the only source of information to understand ( maybe only

partially) the archeological findings more specially the artistic and pictorial evidence. The Gimboutas

theory of signs appear to be as presice and good acadmic approach to try to understand ceirtain but

important aspects of primitive human colectives like their cosmo vision and religious beliefs, their

daily life and their form of view or intrepretate the world what surrond them. I it coud be consider as

an interesting reason but it coud have certain limits. Gimboutas depended in great part to made her

studies in the archeological findings in a huge area and the later comparative study of the findings . Its

gave some interesting and reasonable answer to some questions about the neolitic comunities in the

Balcans and around the aegean sea, but maybe in the studies of some isolated ancient comunities with

no conection (or not directly) with later human comunities or groups the work maybe be a little more

complicated.