Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

18
Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012

Transcript of Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

Page 1: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

Opening DOORS Program

Indianapolis, INSeptember 25, 2012

Page 2: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

2

Second NPRM on DBE

• Sent to Federal Register August 22nd

• Published September 6, 2012

• Comment period ends

November 5, 2012.Docket number-OST-2012-0147Http://www.regulations.gov

Page 3: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

3

Highlights • New forms• Definitions• DBE program requirements (who must

have one)• Goal setting• TVMs• Good faith efforts• Counting DBE participation• Certification—not covered during this

session!

Page 4: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

4

New Forms

• Revised application form (removes old SBA-DOT MOU language)

• Revised semi-annual report:– Track on-going payments– Track women, minority women,

minorities

Page 5: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

5

Page 6: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

6

Definitions

• Eight new definitions:– Assets– Business, business concern or business

enterprise– Contingent liability– Days– Immediate family member– Liabilities– Non-disadvantaged individual– Principal place of business– Transit Vehicle Manufacturer

Page 7: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

7

DBE Program• Makes clear that recipient must have

a DBE program if it receives $250K in planning, capital, or operating assistance in a fiscal year.

• Cannot exclude prime contracts below $250K from the threshold

• Proposes to not allow sub-recipients to have their own program—must operate under the direct recipient’s DBE program

USDOT User
I'd like to say that the NPRM formalizes existing FHWA policy that subrecipients may not operate under their own program.
Page 8: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

8

Goal Setting• Would allow use of bidders’ list to

determine relative availability of DBEs, but only if well documented and supported.

• Proposes to disallow use of pre-qualified contractors list to establish availability.

• Proposes to not allow step two adjustments-especially a downward adjust of the availability—unless it is clearly warranted.

• Makes clear that FTA, FHWA or FAA can adjust an improperly determined goal.

Page 9: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

9

Goal Setting Cont.

• Proposes to allow goals for entire project or just the Federal share.

• Proposes to eliminate the public comment period and allow publication on website only.

• Proposes to require stronger consultation efforts before setting goal.

Page 10: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

10

TVMs

• Proposes to prohibit TVMS from selectively determining which contracting opportunities are available to DBEs

• Proposes to prohibit transit agencies from issuing overly proscriptive vehicle procurements, which diminishes competition in violation of 49 U.S.C. 5325(h)

• Proposes to prohibit using entire federal share as base figure for DBE goal

Page 11: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

11

TVMs cont.

• Proposes to require reporting even when there is no activity

• Proposes to make clear that post-award DBE requirements need not be followed when or reported in those years where TVM has not been awarded a contract or is not performing on a contract.

Page 12: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

12

Good Faith Efforts

• Proposes to remove “responsive/responsible” language.

• Proposes to have Bidders submit all DBE info at time of bid (except in negotiated procurements)

• Proposes to require copies of DBE and non-DBE quotes received when non-DBE was chosen over DBE because of price

Page 13: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

13

Good Faith Efforts cont.

• Proposes to options for when GFE documents have to be submitted:– At time of original bid– One day after winning the bidA promise by a prime contractor bidder to include DBEs after the award is not evidence of GFE

Page 14: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

14

Good Faith Efforts Cont.• Proposes new contract clause that work

committed by prime to specific DBE must be performed by that DBE (unless the recipient approves)--or prime cannot be paid for that work

• Proposes a clear process for replacing a DBE during contract performance

• Proposes new contract clause that failure to comply with DBE regulations is a material breach of the contract, resulting in various sanctions

• Proposes to require prime contractor to provide all subcontracts for all DBEs at all levels.

Page 15: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

15

Good Faith Efforts Cont.

• Proposes to strengthen requirements of recipients when evaluating good faith efforts of contractor failing to meet goal

• Review other bids to determine if higher bids met the goal

• Review and compare bids of DBE and non-DBE when non-DBE was chosen due to price

• No objective checklists

Page 16: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

16

Counting DBE Participation

• Proposes to allow DBEs to lease trucks from non-DBE leasing firm without any loss of credit.

• Counting must be done on a case-by-case basis—regardless of certification

• Asks for comment regarding “regular dealer” concept. Is a DBE regular dealer just a “middleman”?

Page 17: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

17

Certification Highlights

• Gross Receipts Cap from $22.41 to $23.98M –inflationary adjustment

• Ownership• Control• Prequalification• Certification decisions• Denials of initial requests for certification• Removal of eligibility• Suspension of certification

Page 18: Opening DOORS Program Indianapolis, IN September 25, 2012.

Federal Transit Administration

www.fta.dot.gov