Open Space Extrinsic Material - Moreton Bay Region...Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 3 1.0...
Transcript of Open Space Extrinsic Material - Moreton Bay Region...Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 3 1.0...
Local Government Infrastructure Plan 2017Open Space Extrinsic Material
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 1
Version control
Version Revision date Author Description and reason for change
1 June 2016 Lisa Kubler Version 1
2 August 2016 Gen Denny Minor changes as part of first compliance check
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 2
Contents
1.0 Preliminary .................................................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Open space network ............................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Why is open space important? ............................................................................................... 4
1.3 Open Space Strategy 2012-2031 ............................................................................................. 4
2.0 Service catchments ..................................................................................................................... 5
3.0 Demand assumptions and conversions ...................................................................................... 6
4.0 Desired standards of service ....................................................................................................... 6
4.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 6
4.2 Desired standards of service ................................................................................................... 7
5.0 Definition of trunk infrastructure ............................................................................................. 10
6.0 Network planning and modelling .............................................................................................. 11
6.1 Network principles ................................................................................................................ 12
6.2 Opportunities to meet user needs ........................................................................................ 12
6.3 Catchment analysis ............................................................................................................... 12
6.4 Amendments to catchment analysis ..................................................................................... 14
7.0 Network costings and valuation methodology ......................................................................... 14
7.1 Value of existing assets ......................................................................................................... 14
7.2 Cost estimates for future open space recommendations .................................................... 15
7.3 Exclusions from LGIP cost and contribution calculations ..................................................... 17
8.0 Schedule of works ..................................................................................................................... 18
9.0 Source and supporting documents ........................................................................................... 37
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 3
1.0 Preliminary
The Moreton Bay Region has a diverse and complementary network of open space ranging from
recreation parks, sports fields and civic spaces to linear linkages, natural bushland and conservation
areas. Many of these spaces are provided and managed by the Moreton Bay Regional Council
(‘Council’) for the benefit of the public.
The region’s population is currently over 380,000 people. This is projected to increase by around
150,000 residents by 2031, with growth to occur across a number of communities in the region. This
growth will place considerable pressure on the region’s open spaces to expand and adapt to
changing community preferences. Council must responsibly manage this growth and identify future
open space infrastructure requirements to meet this increasing demand.
The Moreton Bay Regional Council Local Government Infrastructure Plan (‘LGIP’) identifies Council’s
plans for trunk open space infrastructure to service future growth in an effective and financially
responsible manner. This report provides the background information for the open space network,
to support the development of the LGIP.
The report outlines:
1. The service catchments (Section 2);
2. The demand assumptions and conversions (Section 3);
3. The desired standards of service (Section 4);
4. The definition of trunk infrastructure (Section 5);
5. Network planning and modelling (Section 6);
6. Network costing and valuation methodology (Section 7);
7. Schedule of works (Section 8); and
8. Source and supporting documents (Section 9).
1.1 Open space network
Council plans, delivers and maintains a wide variety of both trunk and non-trunk open space across
the region. These areas support a variety of active and passive recreation opportunities, and include
the following open space types:
Recreation parks
Recreation parks offer many different experiences including areas to kick a ball, play on swings,
exercise your dog or just have a picnic and socialise. They range from local, district and regional
recreation parks to the extensive foreshore areas within the region. Recreation parks are generally
considered to be trunk infrastructure, provided they meet the definition outlined in Section 5 below.
Sports parks
Sports parks offer users the opportunity to play their favourite organised sports. These parks may
have a range of fields, courts and surfaces and are often some of the most well used parks in the
region. They may include other facilities like club houses, change rooms, lighting and car parking.
Sports parks are generally considered to be trunk infrastructure, as outlined in Section 5 below.
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 4
Civic parks
Civic parks are often referred to as plazas, town squares or public spaces. They provide important
areas for people to relax, eat lunch, meet friends or attend events. They may also offer facilities such
as playgrounds, shade and seating areas. They are designed to provide amenity in our centres and
create destinations that people are attracted to. Civic parks are generally considered to be trunk
infrastructure, as outlined in Section 5 below.
Other open spaces
Council also plans, delivers and manages a number of other open space types in the region, such as
linear linkage parks, bushland recreation parks and conservation areas. These open space types are
not considered as part of the trunk open space network (as identified in Section 5 below) however
may be included as part of the stormwater and active transport networks where appropriate (i.e.
some linear linkage parks have been more appropriately included in the stormwater and active
transport networks as often their primary function is not the provision of open space).
1.2 Why is open space important?
Investing in open space is a long-term investment in Moreton Bay’s sustainable future. This
investment will create a thriving region where people want to live, work and play. Great open spaces
help to give our communities their unique identity and local citizens a sense of civic pride.
Research has shown that proximity to well-designed and managed parks and green spaces results in
higher property values and has a positive influence on business performance, investor confidence,
lifestyle, health, enhanced character and biodiversity.
Cities, towns and regions that invest in and maintain high-quality public open space look better, feel
better and work better. Prioritising investment in open spaces is not just about aesthetics. It also
helps to resolve health problems and promotes active transport and community development.
Great open space makes for a better quality of life. A network of well-designed and cared-for open
spaces adds to the character of places where people want to live, work and visit. Open spaces also
provide the vital green infrastructure that enables us to deal with floods or mitigate and adapt to
climate change while providing wildlife habitats, sporting facilities or attractive parks.
1.3 Open Space Strategy 2012-2031
Council has developed an Open Space Strategy as part of an integrated framework that seeks to
effectively manage the current and future provision of Council owned or managed open space in the
region. This Strategy is supported by a number of Plans, including the Urban Recreation Park Plan
2012-2031 and Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031.
The Open Space Strategy and associated Plans tell us how, where and when Council should provide
open space infrastructure. The determination of the how, where and when is in part influenced by
State Government policies and other policies within the local government.
The Open Space Strategy and associated Plans are the first review of Council’s open space network
since the amalgamation of the three former local governments in 2008. They incorporate new
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 5
Moreton Bay Regional Council policy, such as the Community Plan 2011-2021 and the Strategic
Framework, and significant changes to State Government policy such as the South East Queensland
Regional Plan 2009-2031.
The Open Space Strategy and associated Plans have informed the preparation of LGIP by identifying
new and upgraded facilities required to meet changing community needs, and determining when
and how these facilities will be provided.
2.0 Service catchments
The open space network service catchments have been determined through the development of the
following documents:
Open Space Strategy 2012-2031
Urban Recreation Park Plan 2012-2031
Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031
Catchment planning for the open space network was undertaken by dividing the region into five
district catchments. The boundaries of the district catchments were based on the Moreton Bay
Regional Council Planning Scheme Strategic Framework planning areas. Some minor changes to the
boundaries were made where required for the purposes of open space network planning, such as
the division between urban and rural areas in the Strategic Framework. These district catchment
areas generally service distinct populations with higher order roads, waterways and environmental
areas and the extent of the urban area generally providing logical catchment boundaries for district
level facilities. It is these district catchments that have been used for the purposes of the LGIP.
The following figure shows the Moreton Bay Region district catchment boundaries.
Figure 1 - LGIP open space network service catchment
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 6
3.0 Demand assumptions and conversions
The population assumptions used to undertake catchment planning for the open space network, as
identified in the Urban Recreation Park Plan 2012-2031 and Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031,
are based on the Moreton Bay Regional Council Planning Assumptions (as at 6 August 2013). These
population assumptions draw on a number of sources, including existing and committed
development, planning intentions such as the SEQ Regional Plan, strategic planning projects and the
place types from the Strategic Framework, growth forecasts such as the urban growth model and
population forecasts from OESR, and land suitability and compatibility to accommodate growth.
While desired standards have been included below for open space provision in enterprise and
employment areas, limited analysis of employment projections has been undertaken as part of the
open space network planning. As such, no employment projections have been included for the
purposes of the development of the LGIP. Further analysis of open space provision in these areas will
be undertaken and incorporated into future revisions of the LGIP as required.
The base year for the planning for the network is 2011, with a planning horizon of 20 years to 2031,
aligning with the latest ABS Census data available.
The following table of existing and projected demand for open space has been used for the
development of the LGIP.
Table 1 — Existing and projected demand for the open space network
Service catchment Existing and projected demand (persons)
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Caboolture 68,939 79,303 88,994 93,481 99,753
Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
31,313 32,968 34,127 34,245 34,403
North Lakes - Redcliffe - Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
163,178 179,925 202,663 221,715 230,419
Rural 31,574 34,959 37,787 40,044 42,474
Strathpine 86,647 92,754 95,050 98,732 103,685
Moreton Bay Region 381,651 419,909 458,621 488,217 510,734
More detailed population projection data can be found in the Urban Recreation Park Analysis and
Sports Park Analysis spreadsheets as identified in the supporting documents below.
4.0 Desired standards of service
The open space network desired standards of service (DSS) were determined through the
development of the following documents:
Urban Recreation Park Plan – Appendix B – Desired Standards of Service
Interim Sports Facilities Plan – Appendix A - Desired Standards of Service
4.1 Overview
To develop the desired standards of service, Council used a combination of network analysis and
open space planning resources. A number of resources were used to inform the standards for the
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 7
network, including reviewing standards from other local governments and the ULDA Open Space
Planning Guidelines.
A desktop review of the existing open space network was undertaken to understand the types,
quantity and distribution of open spaces, their role, function and relationship between the places in
which they are located.
Through the desktop analysis, collaboration with internal stakeholders and after undertaking open
space planning research, there was recognition in the merit of transitioning from a standards
approach to a needs based approach to open space planning. The needs based approach considers
the demographic and physical characteristics of a geographic area to guide future development of
parks and infrastructure. This may include the social composition of an area, the leisure and
recreation preferences and the type and quantity of open spaces to serve those needs. This
approach ensures that parks provide the activities and services which the community will ultimately
desire and utilise, in turn providing greater community benefit and ensuring the effective and
efficient use of public funds.
However, Council still requires desired standards to fulfil its legislative requirements, financial
planning, infrastructure planning and to deliver open spaces through the planning and development
framework. The intent was to develop more flexible standards which account for the needs of
typical neighbourhoods and communities through a number of approaches, to ensure that places
can continue to change and adapt over time to meet user needs.
Further information regarding the open space desired standards of service can be found in the
Urban Recreation Park Plan 2012-2031 and the Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031.
4.2 Desired standards of service
The open space network desired standards of service, for the purposes of the LGIP, are as follows
(note the reference to community infrastructure is included in these desired standards as they have
been incorporated together for the purposes of desired standards for the LGIP. Further information
and additional desired standards specific to community facilities can be found in the Background
Information for the Community Facilities Network report):
a) Provide an accessible network of open space and community facilities that meets the needs of
residents and visitors in accordance with the accessibility standards in Table 2 and rates of
provision identified in Table 3. The targets identify the expected quantum of land required to
meet community demands for open space and community facilities, based on rate of
population, and are related to the place types:
i. AC: Activity Centre
ii. UN: Urban Neighbourhood
iii. NGN: Next Generation Neighbourhood
iv. SN: Suburban Neighbourhood
v. RR: Rural Residential
vi. RT: Rural Township
vii. CC: Coastal Communities
viii. R: Rural
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 8
ix. MFW: Mountain Ranges, Forests and Waterways
x. KER: Key Extractive Resource Areas
xi. CR: Coast and Riverlands
xii. EEA: Enterprise and Employment Areas
xiii. SA: Special Areas
b) The provision targets in Table 3 are intended to be flexible, as many parks provide a number of
functions to the community and service varying areas however the minimum land area of the
park is to be maintained.
c) Ensure land for open space and community facilities has:
i. a minimum land area as identified in the Table 3;
ii. a configuration, slope, and acceptable level of flood immunity in accordance with the
standards identified in Table 4 as well as Council’s adopted standards identified in the
planning scheme.
d) Embellish open space to complement the type and purpose of the park as identified in Table 5:
i. LR: Local Recreation Park (including
Foreshore)
ii. DR: District Recreation Park
(including Foreshore)
iii. RR: Regional Recreation Park
(including Foreshore)
iv. DS: District Sport Park
v. RS: Regional Sport Park
vi. DC: District Civic Park
vii. RC: Regional Civic Park.
Table 2 — Accessibility standards for open space
Park type Place type Accessibility
standard AC UN NGN SN RR RT CC R MFW KER CR EEA SA
Local
Recreation Park
400m
800m
No standard
District
Recreation Park
2.5km
3.5km
No standard
Regional
Recreation Park 10km
District
Sports Park
3km
5km
No standard
Regional Sports
Park 15km
District Civic
Park
Within district centre
No standard
Regional Civic
Park Within major centre
No standard
Note - The accessibility standard is measured "as the crow flies"
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 9
Table 3 — Rate of land provision for open space
Park type Place type Provision
target
Minimum
land area AC UN NGN SN RR RT CC R MFW KER CR EEA SA
Local Recreation
Park
1ha/1000
persons
0.5ha 0.5ha/1000
persons
Where
required
District
Recreation Park
0.6ha/1000
persons 4ha
Regional
Recreation Park
0.5ha/1000
persons 10ha
District Sports
Park
0.8ha/1000
persons 20ha
Regional Sports
Park
0.4ha/1000
persons 40ha
District Civic
Park
1 per district
centre 1,000m2
No provision -
Regional Civic
Park
1 per major
centre 6,000m2
No provision -
Table 4 — Open space design requirements
Park type
Width to
depth
ratio
Min.
width
Min. road
frontage
Road
type
No. access
points Flood immunity
Local
Recreation
Park
0.5 20m 40% Collector
or lower 1
100% of land above
2% AEP
District
Recreation
Park
0.75 30m 30% Collector
or higher 2
80% of land and all
internal roads and car
parking above 2% AEP
Regional
Recreation
Park
0.75 30m 30% Arterial
or higher 3
50% of land and all
formal recreation
areas, internal roads
and vehicle parking
above 2% AEP
District
Sports Park Square or
otherwise
compact overall
shape
Accessible by public
transport, bikeways
and major roads
All playing
fields/courts
have
adequate
access
- All buildings above 1% AEP
- Formal recreation areas, internal roads, hard courts and vehicle parking above 2% AEP
- All playing fields above 5% AEP
Regional
Sports Park
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 10
District Civic
Park Site specific
30% Site
specific
1 100% of land above
1% AEP Regional Civic
Park 40% 1
Table 5 — Standard facilities/embellishments for open space
Opportunities/facilities LR DR RR DS RS DC RC
Private vehicle movement and internal parking
Play areas (large)
Play areas (small)
Cycling & walking opportunities
Nature appreciation opportunities
Multi-use activity space
Performance/community/festival/event space
Formal sports fields/courts/surface (lighting & irrigation)
Picnic areas
Gateway statement
Kick-a-bout spaces
Passive recreation nodes
BMX/skate opportunities
Youth spaces
Seating opportunities
Outdoor recreation opportunities
Dog off leash area
Social gathering spaces
Paddle and recreational boating facilities
Fitness nodes
Public amenities (toilets)
Changing facilities (sports)
Natural areas
Drinking fountains
BBQ
5.0 Definition of trunk infrastructure
Trunk infrastructure includes those elements of a strategic network necessary to service urban
development at the desired standard of service in a coordinated, efficient and financially sustainable
manner. The Statutory Guideline 03/14 – Local Government Infrastructure Plans identifies land and
embellishments for local, district and metropolitan recreation parks and district and metropolitan
sports parks as indicative open space trunk infrastructure.
The Open Space Strategy outlines Council’s classification of parks across the region. These
classifications have been determined based on existing park classifications and a review of other
South East Queensland local government standards. Of note, ‘metropolitan’ level parks as indicated
in the guideline are generally referred to as ‘regional’ parks in the Open Space Strategy
classifications. Furthermore, recreation parks have been further classified as either ‘recreation’,
‘foreshore’ or ‘civic’ parks, based on their role and location in the network. Each of the recreation
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 11
type open spaces requires different desired standards and levels of embellishment as they provide a
variety of recreation uses to the community.
The following park types are considered to be open space trunk infrastructure:
- Sports parks:
Regional level;
District level;
Embellishments including sports fields, shade structures, car parking.
- Recreation parks:
Regional level including Regional Civic Park and Regional Foreshore Park;
District level, including District Civic Park and District Foreshore Park;
Local Parks (including Foreshore), serving more than 350 dwellings, meeting the DSS, and
where not located within 800 metres of another local or higher order park.
Embellishments including shade structures, playgrounds.
These open space trunk infrastructure park types generally provide an open space function for a
wider catchment, servicing multiple development sites and users.
Of note, the definition of trunk infrastructure does not include local level sports parks or civic parks.
While there are a number of these parks currently servicing the community, the Open Space
Strategy indicates that future provision of these local level facilities is not desirable, with
expenditure to be focused on district and regional facilities in the future where economies of scale in
management and maintenance can be achieved.
The Open Space Strategy also identifies open space classifications that are not included in the above
trunk infrastructure definition. These open space areas are not considered open space trunk
infrastructure for the purposes of the LGIP as they are generally either required for a local purpose
and not for a wider catchment, or their primary purpose is not open space (i.e. linear parks have not
been included in the definition of open space trunk infrastructure, as although they provide an
important open space function within the region, their primary role is for stormwater purposes
and/or active transport and as such been more appropriately included within the stormwater trunk
infrastructure definitions).
6.0 Network planning and modelling
The open space network planning and modelling was undertaken as part of the development of the
following documents:
Urban Recreation Park Plan – Appendix C – Catchment Profiles
Interim Sports Facilities Plan – Appendix B - Catchment Profiles
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 12
6.1 Network principles
The Open Space Strategy sets out the fundamental principles for the planning and design of the
Moreton Bay region’s open space network that have been used to undertake network planning.
These principles include:
Relative to place - open space will be planned and designed to relate to location and setting.
Diversity - the open space network will provide a range of passive, active and structured
recreation opportunities in a range of settings and locations.
Connected and accessible - the open space network will be connected through a green
network of corridors and spaces to facilitate access and encourage use.
Safe - open space will be designed and located to provide safe recreational spaces
Sustainable - the open space network will be planned and designed to balance costs with the
service standards expected by both Council and the community.
Fit for purpose - The design of open space will be conducive to facilitating the required
infrastructure and recreational activities and opportunities expected for that open space
type.
Further information on the network principles for open space provision can be found in the Open
Space Strategy 2012-2031.
6.2 Opportunities to meet user needs
Council is responding to user needs by creating attractive parks and open spaces that people will
want to use and enjoy. In such a large region, people’s needs for open space vary depending on
social factors, physical fitness, sports and leisure preferences and location. Council is responding by
providing better parks and facilities using the following themes:
Our park, our place – residents take great pride in their neighbourhoods. It is important that
parks complement the places we live and provide the activities which we expect. Council will
plan spaces that relate to locations by understanding the needs of people and the future
vision of these places.
Connecting people to places – the region has a good network of open spaces. Council will
create accessible parks and open spaces for all members of the community. By doing this we
can create healthy communities and increase access to open spaces and destinations.
Multipurpose and adaptable places – people’s needs for parks and open spaces change over
time. Parks also need to make the best use of space as the area undergoes growth.
Diversity of places and activities – a diverse community has equally diverse expectations for
parks and open space. There is an opportunity for Council to plan for a variety of sports,
recreation activities and facilities across a number of locations.
6.3 Catchment analysis
To complete a thorough assessment of the existing and future open space network in the region,
and identify financially sustainable future infrastructure requirements, the following steps were
undertaken on a local, district and regional catchment basis. From this analysis, priority projects
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 13
were identified for inclusion in the schedule of works (see Section 8). Further information regarding
catchment profiling can be found in the Urban Recreation Parks Plan 2012-2031 and the Interim
Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031.
Step 1: Map and classify all existing open space in the region
A GIS layer containing all existing open space in the region was established using existing databases.
Each existing park was allocated a classification by assessing the particular characteristics of that
park against the definitions included in the Open Space Strategy 2012-2031.
Step 2: Assess existing provision of open space
To assess the existing provision and quality of open space within the region, a five stage process was
established:
1. Demographic analysis – a brief demographic analysis was used to identify the dominant
features of the age profile which helps inform the appropriate embellishment to parks.
2. Accessibility analysis – an accessibility analysis of open space opportunities was undertaken
in each catchment to identify potential shortfalls in the distribution of open space across the
region. The analysis identified residential parcels that exceeded the accessibility thresholds
in each catchment.
3. Function analysis – a function analysis looked at the roles and functions within each
catchment’s open space network, having regard to the existing embellishment levels and
constraints for further development. The analysis matched the available facilities to the age
profiles and identified shortfalls in the existing network.
4. A desired rate of provision - the existing open space network was assessed against the
desired rates of provision contained within the DSS for each park type. Population
assumptions for 2011 were used to determine population rates. This provided a broad
assessment of the current capacity or shortfall in the network.
5. Solutions – series of solution sets for each catchment were identified which demonstrated
the desired standards of service. Where possible, opportunities to upgrade existing open
space areas to meet existing demand requirements were identified to reduce further land
acquisition requirements.
Step 3: Assess future open space requirements
To assess future open space requirements, a four stage process was established.
1. Review the strategic land use direction – this involved a review of the anticipated residential
and employment growth unique to each catchment and consideration of how the relevant
place types for each catchment influenced the open space outcomes.
2. Population projections – population projections to 2031 were used to identify the extent of
growth and the spread of that growth across the catchment.
3. A desired rate of provision - the future open space network was assessed against the desired
rates of provision contained within the DSS for each park type. This provided a broad
assessment of the future capacity or shortfall in the network.
4. Solutions – a series of solution sets for each catchment were identified which demonstrated
the desired standards of service. Where possible, opportunities to upgrade existing open
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 14
space areas to meet future demand requirements were identified to reduce additional land
acquisition requirements.
Step 4: Costing
Estimated costs for future open space recommendations were determined to assess the financial
sustainability of the recommendations. See below for detail on how costings were calculated.
Step 5: Prioritisation
Prioritisation of new urban recreation parks and upgrades was based on the population growth
assumptions for the region.
6.4 Amendments to catchment analysis
Since the development of the Open Space Strategy, Urban Recreation Park Plan and Interim Sports
Facilities Plan, several recommendation changes have been made that have been incorporated into
the LGIP recommendations and schedule of works below. These recommendation changes,
identified in the development phase of the LGIP, include the following:
Projects being completed or still in the investigation phase - these future investigations have
been excluded from the LGIP schedule of works as further analysis is required to determine
the future need for these projects;
Recommendations made in the catchment profiling process that are located outside of the
priority infrastructure area have been excluded from the LGIP.
These projects are identified as non-trunk in the Urban Recreation Park Analysis and Sports Park
Analysis spreadsheets referenced in Section 9 below. The need for a local recreation park in
Murrumba Downs that was not previously identified in the Urban Recreation Park Plan has also been
highlighted and included in the LGIP.
7.0 Network costings and valuation methodology
The following steps were undertaken to determine the costs associated with the provision of the
open space network.
7.1 Value of existing assets
Land values
All existing open space land was attached to a hierarchy and valued using suburb based land
valuations provided by external consultants (for more information see detail below regarding future
infrastructure costing and Section 9 for document references).
Suburb based land valuation was based on three value categories:
land above 1% AEP (Q100);
land between 2% AEP and 1% AEP (Q50 and Q100); and
land below 2% AEP (Q50).
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 15
An average cost per square metre was determined from these three valuations and applied to all
land in the existing open space network.
Around 66% of the existing trunk open space network is located above the 1% AEP, with around 33%
below the 2% AEP. Using an average land valuation as described above generally reflects the balance
of constrained and unconstrained land in the network and is considered sufficient for the purposes
of the schedule of works model.
Embellishments
Existing open space embellishments were identified from Council’s Geographical Information System,
translated into specific assets on Council's Financial Asset Register, and costed by applying standard
unit rates supplied by Council’s operational staff who estimated the approximate cost of installing
and supplying the items.
Where no unit rate was available, assets were valued using the replacement cost value entered into
the asset register, or if no asset data was captured in the register, an average of all active assets for
the specific type of asset was used.
Some assets were considered non-financial and excluded from valuation as per the standard asset
valuation guidelines Council practices, including:
All park assets below $5k (including
park furniture and fences etc.)
All land improvement assets below
$5k (including retaining walls etc.)
Pathways less than 10m length
(excluding kerb ramps)
Concrete slabs
Edging
Arbours
Landscaping including trees, turf etc.
Banana bars
Banner and flag poles
Signs
Softfall
Water hydrants
Taps
Where no valuation was possible assets were considered non-financial (e.g. most artwork).
7.2 Cost estimates for future open space recommendations
Land values
Suburb based and place based land valuations for future parks were obtained from Opteon in 2012-
13 (see Section 9 below for document references).
The Place Type values were market based using sales of land identified in most of the categories. The
values provided included value ranges, an average cost per m2, and constrained land values. In the
Place Types where no suitable market evidence was available, these were assessed in relativity with
the other Place Types. The assessments of Place Types of rural nature were based on rural site
values. The Place Types in urban land were assessed as if the land was undeveloped (i.e. in an
englobo state). A constrained land value ($/m²) was given to areas which were constrained by
factors outside the control of the land holder e.g. powerline easements, protected vegetation, koala
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 16
corridors and flooding. The values of some lands such as large rural lots have not been affected by
these limitations.
Suburb based land valuations were obtained for each of the three former local government areas of
Caboolture, Redcliffe and Pine Rivers. The values provide the value of lands in the following four
categories:
above Q100 flood level,
storm surge affected land,
land between Q50 and Q100 flood level and
land below Q50 flood level.
In the urban footprint the suburb values were equivalent to the value of englobo residential values
(i.e. land held in large parcels suitable for subdivision to residential allotments). In the case of rural
and rural residential lands, the suburb value was in line with values of the surrounding allotments.
These suburb and Place Type land valuations were analysed to determine a Place Type and suburb
valuation per m2 based on the mean, ranges and averages for constrained and unconstrained land
(see the Open Space Land Values spreadsheet as referenced in Section 9 below). Future open space
recommendations requiring land acquisition as outlined in the schedule of works below were given a
land value based on this per m2 rate and the amount of land required as per the desired standards of
service rate of provision.
Embellishments
Estimated embellishment costs for new recreation and civic parks and upgrades to existing
recreation and civic parks were determined by establishing unit rates for individual infrastructure
items. These unit rates were drawn from the following sources:
Landscape Queensland “Costing Guide” 6th edition
Rawlinsons Construction Cost Guide 2012
LocalBuy preferred suppliers cost estimates
Council's Engineering, Construction & Maintenance Division cost estimates based on
previous provision
A detailed breakdown of unit costs and sources can be found in the Urban Recreation Cost Estimates
as identified in Section 9 below.
The level of embellishment for each park type, and therefore associated cost, was determined by
using the desired standards of service to indicate appropriate embellishment requirements. For new
parks, the cost was based on the provision of all embellishments and works required to deliver the
park to the community. For recommended upgrades to existing parks, a site based review of each
park was undertaken to determine which embellishments were required to meet desired standards,
with costs included only for the provision of these additional infrastructure items.
A detailed breakdown of cost calculations for each recreation open space recommendation can be
found in the following documents, as identified in Section 9 below:
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – District and Regional Recreation
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 17
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Local Recreation
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Foreshore
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Civic
The establishment costs outlined above do not include an allowance for project owner’s costs and
contingency. These costs have been added through the schedule of works model.
Future sports facility costings were generally based on existing master plan or budgeted costings
where available or estimated costs based on existing facilities of a similar scale and design. Where
no existing master plan cost or similar facility estimate was available, an estimated cost per hectare
was applied for regional and district scale facilities.
A detailed breakdown of unit costs and sources can be found in the Sports Park Cost Estimates as
identified in Section 9 below, while a detailed breakdown of cost calculations for each sports park
recommendation can be found in the Sports Park Cost Estimates.
Since the development of the Interim Sports Facilities Plan, further detailed planning work has been
undertaken to refine sports recommendations across the region, including refinement of the
estimated costs. Where available, these revised costings have been included in the LGIP costings as
the best available information at this time. The timing of delivery for several sports facility projects
has also been amended to incorporate staging of the development of the facility as identified in the
revised sports facility planning.
The establishment costs outlined above do not include an allowance for project owner’s costs and
contingency. These costs have been added through the schedule of works model.
Embellishment costs are current as at 2012. Escalation has not been considered at the initial costing
stage, as this is dealt with in the schedule of works model.
7.3 Exclusions from LGIP cost and contribution calculations
North Lakes DCP
The North Lakes development area is administered under a separate Development Control
Infrastructure Plan outside the MBRC Planning Scheme. As such, it is administered separately from
the Priority Infrastructure Area (PIA). As some proposed open space facilities within the North Lakes
area are designed to serve the needs of users beyond North Lakes, they are included in the schedule
of works to ensure a complete network to service growth.
Caboolture West
The Caboolture West area was identified in the SEQ Regional Plan 2009-2031 as an identified growth
area outside the urban footprint. Since that time, it has been subject of Master Planning to
determine the extent of area affected, and the desired nature, intensity, distribution and sequence
of land uses. This area is now included in the MBRC Planning Scheme in the Emerging community
zone.
Caboolture West is not included in the Priority Infrastructure Area at this time, as detailed
infrastructure requirements and responsibilities are still being investigated. Pending resolution of
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 18
infrastructure requirements and responsibilities and adoption of the relevant Neighbourhood
Development Plan, urban development within this area would represent a bring-forward of
infrastructure provision. The infrastructure required to service this area is therefore not included in
the schedule of works.
Upon completion of a Neighbourhood Development Plan that includes land subject of a
development application, Council may be prepared to negotiate a voluntary infrastructure
agreement for bring forward infrastructure provision outside the LGIP.
8.0 Schedule of works
The schedule of works describes the future infrastructure assets required to service growth, the
timing of their delivery, and the cost to establish each asset as set out in the table below.
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 19
Table 6 — Open space network schedule of works
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-42 Rural Samford Parklands
Regional Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $5,301,040 $0 $0 $7,505,221
OS-66 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Old Petrie Town
Regional Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $672,273 $0 $0 $951,805
OS-31 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Endeavour Park
Regional Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2016 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,415,802
OS-32 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Scarborough Beach Park
Regional Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2016 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,415,802
OS-44 Strathpine South Pine Sporting Complex - Phase 1
Regional Sport
Upgrade 2014 2016 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $16,328,732
OS-43 Caboolture Caboolture District Recreation
District Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $1,365,390 $3,705,142
$4,503,623 $1,933,121
OS-13 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Sweeney Reserve
District Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $250,000 $0 $0 $353,950
OS-46 Caboolture Parkridge Estate Park
District Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $905,856 $0 $0 $1,282,512
OS-47 Caboolture Platypus Creek Environment
District Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $236,856 $0 $0 $335,341
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 20
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
al Reserve
OS-23 Caboolture Caboolture Civic District
District Civic New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $368,872 $472,595 $574,442 $522,249
OS-17 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Morris Park - Rothwell
District Sport
Upgrade 2012 2016 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $8,494,809
OS-64 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Bribie Island Sports Complex
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2016 $1,240,000 $0 $0 $1,687,302
OS-77 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Dakabin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,884 $566,285 $237,060
OS-78 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Dakabin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $463,311 $563,158 $237,060
OS-79 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Dakabin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $469,100 $570,194 $237,060
OS-84 Strathpine Brendale Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $556,110 $675,955 $237,060
OS-85 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Griffin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,503 $565,822 $237,060
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 21
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-86 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Griffin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,500 $565,818 $237,060
OS-91 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Griffin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,500 $565,819 $237,060
OS-126 Caboolture Caboolture South Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,502 $565,820 $237,060
OS-127 Caboolture Caboolture South Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $616,297 $749,113 $237,060
OS-128 Caboolture Upper Caboolture Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $387,641 $471,180 $237,060
OS-129 Caboolture Caboolture South Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,503 $565,821 $237,060
OS-132 Caboolture Morayfield Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,501 $565,819 $237,060
OS-133 Caboolture Morayfield Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,501 $565,819 $237,060
OS-138 Caboolture Morayfield Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,501 $565,819 $237,060
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 22
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-148 Caboolture Morayfield Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2016 $167,439 $465,502 $565,821 $237,060
OS-73 Strathpine Leslie Patrick Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $95,290 $0 $0 $134,912
OS-76 Strathpine Stanley Street Community Reserve
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $156,510 $0 $0 $221,587
OS-80 Strathpine Baker Street Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $138,217 $0 $0 $195,688
OS-100 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Woorim Foreshore
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $134,600 $0 $0 $190,567
OS-103 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Clayton Park (Bellara)
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $95,450 $0 $0 $135,138
OS-104 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Ernest Sendall Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $102,180 $0 $0 $144,667
OS-107 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Alice Street Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $159,792 $0 $0 $226,234
OS-114 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Huntington Street Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $135,290 $0 $0 $191,544
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 23
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-115 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Bonton Avenue Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $165,049 $0 $0 $233,676
OS-116 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Parsons Boulevarde Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $156,727 $0 $0 $221,894
OS-118 Strathpine Saraband Drive Reserve (North)
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $118,490 $0 $0 $167,758
OS-120 Strathpine Everest Street Reserve
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $45,240 $0 $0 $64,051
OS-140 Caboolture Macaranga Street Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $94,050 $0 $0 $133,156
OS-141 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Kerwalli Street Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $91,600 $0 $0 $129,687
OS-149 Caboolture Bernice Street Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $52,874 $0 $0 $74,859
OS-150 Caboolture Trinity Way Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2016 $159,956 $0 $0 $226,466
OS-71 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Boama Park Local Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2016 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901
OS-106 Coastal Communities
Donnybrook Foreshore
Local Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2016 $560,750 $0 $0 $793,911
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 24
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
and Bribie Island
OS-109 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Toorbul Esplanade (Foreshore) (North)
Local Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2016 $590,612 $0 $0 $836,189
OS-110 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Toorbul Esplanade (Foreshore) (South)
Local Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2016 $175,806 $0 $0 $248,906
OS-12 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Toorbul Community and Sports Centre
District Sport
Upgrade 2012 2016 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901
OS-34 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Rothwell Park
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2016 $250,000 $0 $0 $340,182
OS-53 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Langdon Park
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2016 $800,000 $0 $0 $1,088,582
OS-48 Caboolture CREEC Regional Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $1,885,410 $0 $0 $2,669,366
OS-57 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Strathpine Civic Regional
Regional Civic
Upgrade 2012 2019 $2,132,858 $0 $0 $3,019,704
OS-44 Strathpine South Pine Sporting Complex -
Regional Sport
Upgrade 2014 2019 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $13,607,277
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 25
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
Phase 2
OS-10 Strathpine Bray Park District Recreation
District Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $1,365,390 $5,529,340
$6,720,947 $1,933,121
OS-21 Caboolture Morayfield District Recreation
District Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $1,365,390 $160,112 $194,617 $1,933,121
OS-35 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Dakabin District Recreation
District Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $1,365,390 $114,363 $139,010 $1,933,121
OS-05 Caboolture Brodies Park (North)
District Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $37,412 $0 $0 $52,968
OS-14 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Bellara District Foreshore
District Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2019 $593,136 $0 $0 $839,763
OS-15 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Solander Esplanade Park
District Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2019 $483,655 $0 $0 $684,759
OS-09 Rural Dayboro District Civic
District Civic New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $732,820 $325,297 $395,400 $1,037,527
OS-25 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Margate District Civic
District Civic Investigation 2012 2019 $732,820 $366,231 $445,156 $1,037,527
OS-49 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Reserve (Anzac Avenue) - Kallangur
District Civic Investigation 2012 2019 $732,820 $122,610 $149,033 $1,037,527
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 26
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-60 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Brennan Park
District Civic Investigation 2012 2019 $732,820 $0 $0 $1,037,527
OS-61 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Burpengary District Civic
District Civic Investigation 2012 2019 $732,820 $239,443 $291,044 $1,037,527
OS-62 Strathpine Warner District Civic
District Civic Investigation 2012 2019 $732,820 $275,177 $334,480 $1,037,527
OS-63 Strathpine Albany Creek District Civic
District Civic Investigation 2012 2019 $732,820 $101,806 $123,745 $1,037,527
OS-26 Caboolture Caboolture South District Sport
District Sport
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
$6,077,531 $7,079,008
OS-07 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Bob Brock Park
District Sport
Upgrade 2012 2019 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901
OS-67 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Elizabeth Road Park - Phase 1
District Sport
Investigation 2014 2019 $15,000,000 $0 $0 $20,410,915
OS-75 Strathpine Lawnton Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $400,000 $486,203 $237,060
OS-81 Strathpine Strathpine Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $10,969 $13,333 $237,060
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 27
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-83 Strathpine Strathpine Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $592,662 $720,384 $237,060
OS-87 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Griffin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $465,502 $565,821 $237,060
OS-88 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Griffin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $465,503 $565,822 $237,060
OS-89 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Griffin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $465,505 $565,824 $237,060
OS-90 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Griffin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $465,501 $565,820 $237,060
OS-92 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Griffin Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $465,502 $565,820 $237,060
OS-94 Strathpine Lawnton Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $97,911 $119,012 $237,060
OS-101 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Banksia Beach Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $323,742 $393,511 $237,060
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 28
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-102 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Banksia Beach Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $323,742 $393,510 $237,060
OS-121 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Kallangur Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $201,998 $245,530 $237,060
OS-142 Rural Woodford Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $50,265 $61,098 $237,060
OS-143 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Bongaree Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $323,740 $393,508 $237,060
OS-153 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Reserve (Anzac Avenue) - Kallangur Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2019 $167,439 $613,050 $745,166 $237,060
OS-74 Strathpine Brendale Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land 2012 2019 $0 $1,757,143
$2,135,819 $0
OS-68 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Pearson Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $204,917 $0 $0 $290,122
OS-69 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Haithi Park Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $164,730 $0 $0 $233,225
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 29
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-82 Strathpine Normanby Way
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $109,630 $0 $0 $155,214
OS-93 Strathpine Nicol Way Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $287,404 $0 $0 $406,907
OS-112 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Bestmann Road East Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $155,490 $0 $0 $220,143
OS-123 Caboolture Pumicestone Road Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $35,319 $0 $0 $50,004
OS-124 Caboolture Elof Road Park (East)
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $172,899 $0 $0 $244,790
OS-125 Caboolture Schofield Circuit Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $203,767 $0 $0 $288,494
OS-130 Caboolture Crowe Road Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $181,250 $0 $0 $256,614
OS-131 Caboolture Manning Court Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $65,000 $0 $0 $92,027
OS-144 Strathpine John Leitch Memorial Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $189,654 $0 $0 $268,512
OS-145 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Greenshank Crescent Park
Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2019 $168,767 $0 $0 $238,941
OS-70 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Godwin Beach Esplanade
Local Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2019 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 30
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-105 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Pioneer Park (Boat Ramp) (North)
Local Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2019 $323,506 $0 $0 $458,020
OS-117 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Antigua Crescent Park
Local Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2019 $500,000 $0 $0 $707,901
OS-54 Strathpine Rob Akers Reserve
District Sport
Upgrade 2012 2019 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $1,557,382
OS-40 Strathpine Nolan Park Regional Sport
Upgrade 2012 2019 $3,861,541 $0 $0 $5,467,176
OS-39 Caboolture Moreton Bay Central Sports Complex - Phase 1
Regional Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $26,500,000 $0 $0 $36,059,283
OS-28 Rural Woodford District Sport
District Sport
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2021 $6,560,618 $68,619 $83,406 $9,288,533
OS-04 Caboolture Caboolture Sports Centre
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $1,160,000 $0 $0 $1,578,444
OS-18 Caboolture Petersen Road Sportsgrounds
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $770,000 $0 $0 $1,047,760
OS-19 Strathpine James Drysdale Reserve
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $4,100,000 $0 $0 $5,578,983
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 31
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-41 Rural Samford Parklands
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $4,400,000 $0 $0 $5,987,202
OS-51 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Redcliffe Showgrounds
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $850,000 $0 $0 $1,156,619
OS-52 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Narangba Sport and Recreation Complex
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $2,205,000 $0 $0 $3,000,404
OS-67 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Elizabeth Road Park - Phase 2
District Sport
Investigation 2014 2021 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $16,328,732
OS-30 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Zammit Street Sportsgrounds
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $755,000 $0 $0 $1,027,349
OS-33 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Beachmere Sportsgrounds
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2021 $2,670,000 $0 $0 $3,633,143
OS-38 Rural Kurwongbah Sport
Regional Sport
Investigation 2012 2021 $0 $2,500,000
$3,038,766 $0
OS-39 Caboolture Moreton Bay Central Sports Complex - Phase 2
Regional Sport
Upgrade 2014 2026 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $5,822,649
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 32
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-44 Strathpine South Pine Sporting Complex - Phase 3
Regional Sport
Upgrade 2014 2026 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $11,645,297
OS-22 Caboolture Caboolture South District Recreation
District Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $1,365,390 $655,604 $796,891 $2,067,990
OS-08 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
North Lakes District Sport
District Sport
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $1,900,000 $26,285,714
$31,950,450 $2,877,699
OS-67 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Elizabeth Road Park - Phase 3
District Sport
Investigation 2014 2026 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $17,467,946
OS-95 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Mango Hill Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $662,191 $804,897 $253,599
OS-96 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Mango Hill Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $511,397 $621,606 $253,599
OS-97 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Mango Hill Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $511,396 $621,605 $253,599
OS-98 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Mango Hill Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $662,193 $804,900 $253,599
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 33
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-99 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Mango Hill Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $662,192 $804,899 $253,599
OS-111 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Ningi Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $323,741 $393,509 $253,599
OS-113 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Deception Bay Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $144,974 $176,217 $253,599
OS-119 Strathpine Everton Hills Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $511,396 $621,605 $253,599
OS-134 Caboolture Caboolture Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $465,503 $565,821 $253,599
OS-135 Caboolture Caboolture Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $465,501 $565,820 $253,599
OS-136 Caboolture Caboolture Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $465,502 $565,821 $253,599
OS-137 Caboolture Caboolture Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $465,501 $565,819 $253,599
OS-146 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Deception Bay Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2026 $167,439 $113,321 $137,742 $253,599
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 34
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-108 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Donnybrook Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land 2012 2026 $0 $3,153 $3,832 $0
OS-122 Caboolture Caboolture Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land 2012 2026 $0 $194,658 $236,607 $0
OS-151 Strathpine Everton Hills Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land 2012 2026 $0 $700,294 $851,211 $0
OS-24 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Ray Frawley Fields
District Sport
Upgrade 2014 2026 $165,000 $0 $0 $240,184
OS-56 Strathpine Strathpine Regional Recreation
Regional Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2031 $1,135,530 $373,460 $453,943 $1,794,625
OS-37 Strathpine Pine Rivers Park
Regional Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2031 $1,089,512 $0 $0 $1,721,897
OS-59 Caboolture 94 Lower King Street, Caboolture
Regional Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2031 $1,062,800 $0 $0 $1,679,681
OS-29 Coastal Communities and Bribie Island
Woorim Foreshore
Regional Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2031 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,580,430
OS-55 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Redcliffe Civic Regional
Regional Civic
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2031 $2,862,719 $2,402,233
$2,919,929 $4,524,326
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 35
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-44 Strathpine South Pine Sporting Complex - Phase 4
Regional Sport
Upgrade 2014 2031 $8,930,000 $0 $0 $13,564,240
OS-50 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Murrumba Downs District Recreation
District Recreation
New Land 2012 2031 $0 $322,178 $391,609 $0
OS-01 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Barry Bolton Park
District Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2031 $966,232 $0 $0 $1,527,062
OS-06 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Kroll Gardens
District Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2031 $1,071,932 $0 $0 $1,694,113
OS-16 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Deception Bay Community Centre
District Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2031 $629,056 $0 $0 $994,179
OS-20 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Blatchford Sporting & Recreation Reserve
District Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2031 $865,412 $0 $0 $1,367,723
OS-03 Caboolture Wamuran District Sport
District Sport
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2031 $4,000,000 $2,836,755
$3,448,093 $6,321,718
OS-27 Rural Dayboro District Sport
District Sport
New Land & Embellishment
2014 2031 $400,000 $3,416,000
$3,766,140 $607,581
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 36
Item ID
District catchment
Park name Park type Solution Base year (valuation)
Estimated year of completion
Baseline cost (works)*
Baseline cost (land)*
Guideline compliant cost (Land)#
Guideline compliant cost (Embellishments)#
OS-67 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Elizabeth Road Park - Phase 4
District Sport
Investigation 2014 2031 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $12,151,614
OS-139 Rural Dayboro Local Recreation
Local Recreation
New Land & Embellishment
2012 2031 $167,439 $6,812 $8,280 $264,626
OS-152 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Lahore Park Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2031 $183,580 $0 $0 $290,135
OS-72 Strathpine Skate Park Local Recreation
Upgrade 2012 2031 $45,480 $0 $0 $71,878
OS-147 North Lakes, Redcliffe, Moreton Bay Rail Corridor
Deception Bay Local Foreshore
Local Foreshore
Upgrade 2012 2031 $565,878 $0 $0 $894,330
OS-02 Rural Alan Cash Park
District Sport
Upgrade 2012 2031 $400,000 $0 $0 $632,172
Total $92,372,891 $310,318,339
* Baseline excludes any project owner costs or contingency # Statutory guideline 03/14 - Local government infrastructure plans
Open Space Extrinsic Material - 2017 37
9.0 Source and supporting documents
Source RIO Reference
Open Space Strategy 2012-2031, MBRC (2015)
Appendix A - Park Classification System
Appendix B - Program Action Plan
A12651989
A12651991
A12651990
Urban Recreation Park Plan 2012-2031, MBRC (2015)
Appendix A - Facility Audit
Appendix B - Desired Standards of Service
Appendix C - Catchment Profiles
Appendix D - Program Action Plan
Appendix E - Future Infrastructure Requirements
A12653687
A12653787
A12653840
A12668660
A12658355
A12658472
Urban Recreation Park Analysis, MBRC (2015) A10360479
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates, MBRC (2013)
Urban Recreation Unit Rates
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – District and Regional Recreation
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Local Recreation
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Foreshore
Urban Recreation Cost Estimates – Civic
A10360474
A10360471
A10360473
A10360472
A10360470
Interim Sports Facilities Plan 2012-2031, MBRC (2015)
Appendix A - Desired Standards of Service
Appendix B - Catchment Profiles
Appendix C - Future Infrastructure Requirements
A11938645
A11938648
A11938646
A11938647
Sports Park Analysis, MBRC (2015) A11911497
Sports Park Cost Estimates, MBRC (2015)
Sports Park Unit Rates
Sports Park Cost Estimates
A11913381
A11913400
Open Space Land Values, MBRC (2013) A12172626
Valuation Report – Indicative Land Values for the Proposed Moreton Bay Regional
Planning Scheme 2013, Opteon (2013)
A12172633
Valuation Report – Priority Infrastructure Plan Schedule of Valuations for
Caboolture District Moreton Bay Regional Council, Opteon (2012)
A12172630
Valuation Report – Priority Infrastructure Plan Schedule of Valuations for Pine
Rivers District Moreton Bay Regional Council, Opteon (2012)
A12172631
Valuation Report – Priority Infrastructure Plan Schedule of Valuations for Redcliffe
District Moreton Bay Regional Council, Opteon (2012)
A12172632
Landscape Queensland “Costing Guide” 6th edition, Landscape Queensland (2009) -
Rawlinsons Construction Cost Guide 2012, Rawlinsons (2012) -